p53 and TAp63 Promote Keratinocyte Proliferation and Differentiation in Breeding Tubercles of the Zebrafish
p63 is a multi-isoform member of the p53 family of transcription factors. There is compelling genetic evidence that ΔNp63 isoforms are needed for keratinocyte proliferation and stemness in the developing vertebrate epidermis. However, the role of TAp63 isoforms is not fully understood, and TAp63 knockout mice display normal epidermal development. Here, we show that zebrafish mutants specifically lacking TAp63 isoforms, or p53, display compromised development of breeding tubercles, epidermal appendages which according to our analyses display more advanced stratification and keratinization than regular epidermis, including continuous desquamation and renewal of superficial cells by derivatives of basal keratinocytes. Defects are further enhanced in TAp63/p53 double mutants, pointing to partially redundant roles of the two related factors. Molecular analyses, treatments with chemical inhibitors and epistasis studies further reveal the existence of a linear TAp63/p53->Notch->caspase 3 pathway required both for enhanced proliferation of keratinocytes at the base of the tubercles and their subsequent differentiation in upper layers. Together, these studies identify the zebrafish breeding tubercles as specific epidermal structures sharing crucial features with the cornified mammalian epidermis. In addition, they unravel essential roles of TAp63 and p53 to promote both keratinocyte proliferation and their terminal differentiation by promoting Notch signalling and caspase 3 activity, ensuring formation and proper homeostasis of this self-renewing stratified epithelium.
Published in the journal:
p53 and TAp63 Promote Keratinocyte Proliferation and Differentiation in Breeding Tubercles of the Zebrafish. PLoS Genet 10(1): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004048
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004048
Summary
p63 is a multi-isoform member of the p53 family of transcription factors. There is compelling genetic evidence that ΔNp63 isoforms are needed for keratinocyte proliferation and stemness in the developing vertebrate epidermis. However, the role of TAp63 isoforms is not fully understood, and TAp63 knockout mice display normal epidermal development. Here, we show that zebrafish mutants specifically lacking TAp63 isoforms, or p53, display compromised development of breeding tubercles, epidermal appendages which according to our analyses display more advanced stratification and keratinization than regular epidermis, including continuous desquamation and renewal of superficial cells by derivatives of basal keratinocytes. Defects are further enhanced in TAp63/p53 double mutants, pointing to partially redundant roles of the two related factors. Molecular analyses, treatments with chemical inhibitors and epistasis studies further reveal the existence of a linear TAp63/p53->Notch->caspase 3 pathway required both for enhanced proliferation of keratinocytes at the base of the tubercles and their subsequent differentiation in upper layers. Together, these studies identify the zebrafish breeding tubercles as specific epidermal structures sharing crucial features with the cornified mammalian epidermis. In addition, they unravel essential roles of TAp63 and p53 to promote both keratinocyte proliferation and their terminal differentiation by promoting Notch signalling and caspase 3 activity, ensuring formation and proper homeostasis of this self-renewing stratified epithelium.
Introduction
The mammalian epidermis is a self-renewing stratified epithelium on the outer surface of the skin. During embryogenesis, it develops from the surface ectoderm, which is initially a single-layered epithelium. Stratification is initiated (E10 in mouse) with the formation of the outer periderm, leading to a bi-layered epidermal organization in which peridermal cells are attached to each other via tight junctions to protect the embryo against the amniotic fluid [1], [2]. Further epidermal maturation (E12.5–E17.5 in mouse) takes place beneath with the consecutive formation of the spinous, granular and cornified layers, establishing the later epidermal barrier, while the periderm is sloughed off [3]–[6]. Crucial contributions to this later epidermal barrier come from the granular layer, in which cells are sealed to each other via tight junctions, and from the outer cornified layers, providing physical resistance and preventing dehydration. Formation of this water barrier is essential for the adaptation to terrestrial life both during the ontogeny [7] and the evolution [8], [9] of land-based vertebrates. Accordingly, fish lack epidermal cornification.
In zebrafish, the embryonic and larval epidermis is bi-layered, consisting of an outer enveloping layer (EVL) segregating from inner cells before surface ectoderm specification [10], [11], and a basal keratinocyte layer, resembling the bi-layered organization of the mammalian epidermis at midgestation stages. Further stratification of the zebrafish epidermis only commences with the onset of metamorphosis (after three weeks of development), during which the epidermis becomes multi-layered. However, keratinocytes remain metabolically active throughout, including the outer-most layer, and lack morphological signs of cornification [12], [13]. This is in contrast to the organization of breeding tubercles, contact and secondary sex organs on the head and pectoral fin rays. Based on morphological studies in several other fish species, they were described as “keratinized epidermal appendages covered by a layer of dead cells with altered content” [14], suggesting that in breeding tubercles, keratinocytes might undergo more advanced, cornification-like differentiation processes.
Mammalian keratinocyte cornification is a multi-step process initiated by a switch in the expression of particular keratin genes, followed by the expression of the keratin-bundling protein filaggrin and proteins such as involucrin and loricrin, which together with keratins become cross-linked by transglutaminases (Tgm1-4) to reinforce the formation of a cornified envelope [15]–[17]. Furthermore, lipids stored in lamellar bodies are extruded into the extracellular space to form a lipid envelope. During these later steps, cells enter an apoptotic-like phase, lose cytoplasmic organelles including the nucleus, and are eventually sloughed from the skin surface. This loss of corneocytes by desquamation is tightly balanced by keratinocyte proliferation in basal layers, allowing constant self-renewal during epidermal homeostasis.
A key regulator of mammalian epidermal stratification and keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation is p63, a homolog of the tumour suppressor and transcription factor p53 [18]–[24]. Use of alternative promoters of the Tp63 gene gives rise to two isoform categories: those with an N-terminal transactivation domain (TAp63 isoforms), as also present in p53, and those lacking this domain (ΔNp63 isoforms) and acting as inhibitory competitors of their TA counterparts. In addition, alternative splicing gives rise to at least three different C-terminal isoforms (α,β,γ) in each category, and to different N-terminal isoforms of TAp63 [25]. Recent analyses of mice specifically lacking the ΔN isoforms indicate that ΔNp63 is required for maintaining the proliferative potential of basal keratinocytes in embryonic epidermis while preventing their premature entry into terminal differentiation [26], consistent with findings obtained in cultured keratinocytes [27]–[29]. In contrast, TAp63 and p53 might promote keratinocyte differentiation. Thus, in inducible cell lines, TAp63 activates genes involved in keratinocyte differentiation, including different tgms [30]. Also p53, via direct and indirect activation of Notch signalling, has been shown to be required for keratinocyte differentiation in cell culture systems and during squamous cell carcinoma suppression in mouse tumour models [31], [32]. siRNA-mediated knockdown studies in organotypic cultures of human keratinocytes further suggest that it is primarily p53 that antagonizes the proliferation-stimulating effect of ΔNp63, and that the contribution of TAp63 to keratinocyte differentiation is minor compared to that of ΔNp63 [29], [33]. Furthermore, TA-specific p63 mutant mice lack an abrogation of keratinocyte differentiation [34]–[36], leaving the in vivo role of TAp63 during keratinocyte development unclear.
Notch signalling promotes different steps of mammalian keratinocyte differentiation in vivo [37]–[41]. Upon binding of Delta or Jagged ligands, the Notch receptor is cleaved and releases its intracellular domain (NICD), which binds to the transcriptional repressor RBP-J, enabling it to activate target genes that are repressed in the absence of Notch signals. Findings concerning the interconnection between p53/p63 and Notch signalling are controversial. Thus, Jagged1/2 and Notch1 have been reported to be positively regulated by p53 and TAp63γ [31], [42]–[46], but also by ΔNp63 [26], [43], while in other systems, the Notch target Hes1 was negatively regulated by both TAp63 and ΔNp63 [43]. How Notch signalling promotes keratinocyte differentiation is also incompletely understood [38], [47]. One described Notch/RBP-target gene in embryonic mouse keratinocytes encodes caspase 3 [39]. This cysteine protease not only executes apoptosis, but also promotes terminal differentiation processes in a range of cell types [48], leading to delayed basal keratinocyte differentiation in caspase 3 mutant mouse embryos [39].
Here, we identify the zebrafish breeding tubercles as sites with higher keratinocyte proliferation in basal layers as well as more advanced, cornification-like keratinocyte differentiation in upper layers, including transglutaminase expression and stronger keratinization, exclusive presence of tight junctions in second-tier keratinocytes, and rudimentary lipid envelope formation and constant desquamation and renewal of surface keratinocytes. In addition, we identify zebrafish TAp63 isoforms and a TA-specific p63 loss-of-function mutant, revealing essential and partially redundant roles of TAp63 and p53 to promote both keratinocyte proliferation at the base and terminal keratinocyte differentiation in upper layers of breeding tubercles. Both effects are mediated via Notch signalling and activated caspase 3, although these mediators are restricted to upper breeding tubercle layers, pointing to a combination of cell autonomous and non-cell autonomous effects. These findings will help to better understand the seemingly controversial roles described for TAp63 and p53 in different systems.
Results
Regular epidermis and breeding tubercles display different patterns of superficial cell renewal
Even after metamorphosis (approximately 30 days post fertilization; dpf), when the zebrafish epidermis has become multi-layered, superficial epidermal cells display crucial similarities to the embryonic enveloping layer (EVL), like the presence of tight junctions and distinct microridges at their outer surface [12]. To determine the developmental origin of superficial cells of the adult zebrafish epidermis, we carried out transgenic lineage tracing experiments, using promoter elements that drive embryonic expression confined to the outer EVL (krt4) [49] or the basal layer (krt19) [50], respectively (Figure 1A; 5 dpf). Employing these promoters in an inducible binary transgenic Cre/Lox-system, embryonic EVL cells or basal keratinocytes were stably labeled via tamoxifen application from 1–4 dpf (Figure 1B–F). At 60 dpf, superficial cells of the regular body epidermis consisted of a mixture of derivates of embryonic EVL cells (Figure 1B) and basal keratinocytes (Figure 1C,D). However, both expressed the same marker genes (Figure 1B–D; and data not shown) and displayed identical morphological characteristics (Figure 1E). This suggests that in regular epidermis, embryonic EVL cells can persist beyond metamorphosis and are only slowly replaced by derivatives of basal keratinocytes. However, renewed superficial cells seem to have the same properties and functions as persisting EVL cells.
A different pattern was observed in spike-like epidermal structures that according to their location and fine structure (see below) were identified as breeding tubercles [14]. Here, superficial cells consisted solely of derivatives of basal keratinocytes and failed to express markers of the embryonic EVL and of the superficial cells of the regular epidermis (Figure 1D; n = 13/13), suggesting that they have been renewed completely and have acquired a different fate.
Breeding tubercles of adult zebrafish display more advanced stratification and keratinocyte differentiation
In adult zebrafish, breeding tubercles were exclusively present in a disc- and row-like structure on each side of the lower jaw (Figure 2A), as well as in rows along the bony rays of the pectoral fins of males (Figure 2B), but not females (Figure 2C). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed that superficial cells of breeding tubercles, also called cap cells [14], lacked the microridges present at the outer surface of regular epidermis (Figure 2D,E). In addition, they lacked expression of tg(krt4:GFP) (Figure 2G) and other specific markers of superficial cells of regular epidermis (data not shown), and displayed a different cytoplasmic composition in AFOG trichrome stainings (Figure 2F). Furthermore, immunofluorescence revealed a higher keratin content of tubercle keratinocytes compared to regular epidermis (Figure 2H). Correspondingly, expression levels of the type II keratin gene krt8 were significantly higher in breeding tubercles than in regular epidermis (Figure 2I). Furthermore, the type I keratins krtt1c11a (ZFIN: zgc:136902) and krt17 (ZFIN: zgc:92061) were exclusively expressed in lower tubercle layers, but not in regular epidermis (Figure 2J and data not shown), while expression of type II keratin krt5 and type I cytokeratin cki [51] was shared by regular epidermis and lower tubercle layers, but absent in upper layers of the tubercles (Figure 2K and data not shown). Strikingly, tgm1 [52], encoding the cross-linking enzyme transglutaminase 1 involved in cornification of the mammalian epidermis [53], was exclusively expressed in upper layers of the breeding tubercles (Figure 2L).
Striking differences were also observed at the structural level. In regular epidermis, basal and intermediary keratinocytes were of similar shapes and organized in a rather irregular pattern. In contrast, basal cells of tubercles were more regularly aligned to each other, while intermediary cells displayed a looser and spinous-like organization (Figures 2F and 3A,B), connected to each other via local desmosomes, but with wide extracellular spaces in between (Figure 3C). Tight junctions were only found in the second tier layer directly beneath the cap layer (Figure 3D), similar to their confinement to granular cells beneath the cornified layers in mammals. Desmosomes were also present between second tier and outer cap cells. However, in many samples, they were in the process of regression, leading to a partial dissociation of the two layers (Figure 3E). In addition, cap cells contained large vesicles reminiscent of lamellar bodies [54], extruding their content into the space between cap and second tier cells (Figure 3F), which was filled with material resembling the extracellular lipid lamellae in cornifying layers of the mammalian epidermis [54] (Figure 3G). Gradual loss of desmosomes was also observed between adjacent cap cells, but accompanied by cell membrane deterioration and cellular fusion (Figure 3H). Intracellular, cap and second tier cells contained large amounts of electron-dense granules (Figure 3G,H), while apart from nuclei (see below), cell organelles like mitochondria were largely absent (data not shown).
In sum, these data indicate that breeding tubercles display a more pronounced stratification than regular epidermis, consisting of different layers with distinct morphological properties and some cornification-like features in the superficial layer.
Breeding tubercles are formed during metamorphosis and undergo regular desquamation and renewal of superficial layers
Regular epidermis becomes multi-layered during metamorphosis [12], with final thicknesses between 3 and 10 layers, depending on the position on the body (data not shown). Breeding tubercles develop at the same time. At 21 dpf (6.0–6.5 mm body length) and 24 dpf (6.5–7.0 mm), the future breeding tubercle domain on the lower jaw was still covered by microridge-bearing peridermal cells (Figure 4A,B). At 28 dpf (7.5–9.0 mm), first elevations with microridge-free outer cells were present (Figure 4C), which had acquired the mature spiky shape at 31 dpf (10.0–11.0 mm) (Figure 4D).
Already at early elevation stages, tubercles were observed in which some of the smooth outer cells had been lost, exposing second tier cells with a rougher surface (Figure 4E), possibly reflecting former contact points to the lost outer cells. During later stages, entire sheets of outer cells were lifted up (Figure 4F) and shed. Corresponding spiky discs (Figure 4G–I) or rows were found in the water, in particular after spawning. Confocal analyses after DAPI-staining revealed that the spikes of these sloughed structures were hollow, indicating that they consisted solely of cap layers. To investigate whether shed cap layers are renewed, we took advantage of their unique property to be readily and permissively stained with externally applied dyes like calcein (Figure 4J) or methylene blue, reflecting their loss of cell membrane integrity, a hallmark of cell death [55]. In contrast, second tier and deeper cells remained unstained. In daily analyses of the same fish over several weeks, calcein permeability of individual discs or rows was randomly lost within one day and only regained after 7–14 days (Figure 4K,L; n = 12), suggesting that shed cap cells are replaced by second tier cells and that it takes the latter 7–14 days to terminally differentiate.
Spinous and cap layers of breeding tubercles display high levels of activated caspase 3, whereas basal layers exhibit high proliferation rates
In contrast to mammalian corneocytes, cap cells of breeding tubercles still contain their nuclei. However, compared to the nuclei of basal and spinous keratinocytes (Figure 5A,B), their chromatin was strongly condensed (Figure 5C), similar to the pyknosis apparent during cell death [56]. Nevertheless, cap cells were TUNEL (Terminal deoxynucleotidy transferease dUTP nick end labelling)-negative (Figure 5D,E), pointing to the absence of DNA fragmentation, whereas they showed high levels of activated caspase 3 (aCasp3; Figure 5F). This cysteine protease, which does not only execute apoptosis, but also promotes differentiation of embryonic keratinocytes [39], [48], was also present in spinous cells in intermediary tubercle layers (Figure 5F), which had normal nuclei (Figure 5B) and excluded externally applied dyes (Figure 4J), thus lacking all hallmarks of cell death. In contrast, aCasp3 was absent from basal tubercle layers and regular epidermis (Figure 5F). This aCasp3 distribution pattern was largely complementary to that of p63, which was present in all layers of regular epidermis, but confined to lower layers of breeding tubercles (Figure 5G). Cell proliferation, assayed via BrdU incorporation, displayed the same pattern like p63, complementary to aCasp3 (Figure 5H). However, proliferation rates in lower tubercle layers were significantly higher than in regular epidermis, both in fully grown (Figure 5H,J) as well as in developing tubercles (Figure 5I,J).
In sum, in contrast to regular epidermis, where keratinocytes of all layers display comparable p63 and proliferation levels while lacking activated caspase 3, at least two domains can be distinguished in breeding tubercles: aCasp3-positive cells in the upper layers that are postmitotic and undergo more advanced differentiation, and aCasp3-negative keratinocytes at the base, with proliferation rates even higher than in regular epidermis. Furthermore, aCasp3 in upper layers is not correlated with apoptosis.
TAp63 and p53 mutants display compromised breeding tubercle development
In light of the described observations, we next studied breeding tubercle development in zebrafish loss-of-function mutants in p53 and TAp63, potential regulators of keratinocyte differentiation and proliferation in mammalian cell culture systems [29], [31]–[33]. The p53zdf1 allele bears an (M214K) exchange of a conserved amino acid residue in the DNA-binding domain that compromises p53 activity [57]. For zebrafish p63, only ΔN isoforms had been described thus far [58], [59]. However, via exon prediction of genomic sequences upstream of the ΔNp63-specific exon (Ensembl accession number ENSDARG00000044356) and validation via RT-PCR analyses and cDNA sequencing, two N-terminal TAp63 isoforms, TA1 and TA4, were identified (Figures 6A and S1) that are similar to the corresponding isoforms in mammals [25] (39% aa identity; 55% aa similarity; Figure S2A,B; GenBank accession numbers KF682365, KF682366). TA1 corresponds to mammalian full-length TAp63, TA4 to Δ40TAp63, which was the initially described human isoform [18]. Furthermore, the exon-intron organization is conserved between mammals and fish (Figure S1), and sequences from shark to human segregate in the expected phylogenetic pattern (Figure S2C).
Both predicted TAp63 isoforms (TA1, TA4) were expressed in adult zebrafish skin (Figure 6B). Comparative regular (Figure 6C) and quantitative real-time RT-PCR (Figure 6D) analyses further revealed almost exclusive presence of ΔNp63 transcripts in early zebrafish embryos, similar to the situation in mouse [60]. At the onset of metamorphosis (20 dpf), TAp63 levels were approximately 5fold increased, but still constituted only 1.3% of the total p63 levels (Figure 6D). Also in adult zebrafish skin, TAp63 was expressed at much lower levels than ΔNp63 (approx. 2%), whereas higher TAp63 transcript levels were found in the ovary, the site of essential TAp63 function in mouse [34] (Figure 6D). In situ hybridizations with an isoform-specific RNA probe further revealed that TAp63 was expressed in regular epidermis as well as in all layers of the breeding tubercles (Figure 6E,F), similar to the expression pattern of p53 (Figure 6G,H).
To investigate whether the zebrafish TAp63 transcripts are translated into biologically functional proteins, we carried out over-expression studies in zebrafish embryos. Injected synthetic mRNA encoding the TA1 or TA4 isoform of zebrafish TAp63γ caused widespread apoptosis during gastrulation stages (Figure 6I,J), leading to embryonic death or severe malformations during further development (Figure 6K), similar to the previously reported effects of injected zebrafish p53 mRNA [61]. In addition, zebrafish TAp63γ mRNA significantly rescued the (headless) phenotype caused by ΔNp63α over-expression (Figure 6L–N), as previously reported for mouse TAp63 and p53 [58]. This indicates that zebrafish TAp63 transcripts give rise to a protein with p53-like pro-apoptotic and ΔNp63-antagonizing activities.
Using target-selected mutagenesis [62], a TA-specific zebrafish p63 mutant (Tp63hu2525) mutant was isolated that bears a TCA->TAA nonsense mutation (S48X) in the last TA-specific exon truncating the N-terminal isoforms of TAp63, while leaving ΔNp63 isoforms unaffected (Figures 6A and S3). RT-PCR followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of skin samples confirmed the presence of the premature stop codon in TAp63 transcripts of TAp63hu2525/hu2525 animals (Figure 6O). Furthermore, qRT-PCR revealed that in TAp63hu2525/hu2525 mutant skin, TAp63 mRNA levels were more than 7.5 fold reduced compared to wild-type siblings, whereas ΔNp63 mRNA levels were slightly up-regulated (Figure 6P), suggesting that the mutant TAp63 transcripts undergo nonsense-mediated mRNA decay and that TAp63 normally has a subtle negative effect on ΔNp63 transcription. Unfortunately, we could not investigate TAp63 proteins in TAp63hu2525/hu2525 mutants, as all tested p63 antibodies failed to detect p63 proteins after Western blotting of zebrafish extracts (data not shown). However, upon injection of synthetic mRNAs encoding N- or C-terminally Myc-tagged zebrafish TAp63γ, wild-type mRNA gave rise to full-length fusion protein, whereas hu2525 mutant mRNA yielded no products (Figure 6Q and data not shown), suggesting that the stop codon cannot be by-passed, that no internal start site is used, and that the truncated protein is unstable. Furthermore, in contrast to wild-type TAp63γ, hu2525 mutant mRNA lacked pro-apoptotic activity upon over-expression in early zebrafish embryos (Figure 6K; compare columns 2 and 4). Together, this suggests that the hu2525 mutant is a TAp63 null.
Like p53zdf1/zdf1 mutants, TAp63hu2525/hu2525 mutants were viable and fertile. Anti-p63 immunofluorescence analysis revealed normal staining in regular epidermis of TAp63 mutants (Figure 7A,B; Figure S4E–G), suggesting that ΔNp63 is the major p63 isoform of the adult zebrafish skin, consistent with our RT-PCR data. However, both TAp63 and p53 mutants displayed specific breeding tubercle deficiencies of variable strength (C1,C2). SEM (Figure 7C–E), calcein stainings (Figure 7F) and histological sections (Figure 7G–I; Figure S4A–D) revealed complete absence (C2) in some individuals and reduced numbers and/or sizes of tubercles (C1) in others, while frequencies of strongest phenotypes were significantly increased in TAp63/p53 double mutants (Figure 7F). At the molecular level, even tubercle remnants of more weakly affected (C1) TAp63 and/or p53 mutants displayed significant alterations compared to wild-type tubercles, such as reduced tgm1 (Figure 7J–L) and ectopic (ΔN)p63 expression (Figure 7A,B) in upper layers, as well as reduced proliferation rates at the base, which again was most prominent in TAp63/p53 double mutants (Figure 7M–P). In sum, this makes the molecular signature of breeding tubercle remnants of weaker TAp63/p53 mutants more similar to that of the regular epidermis.
Together, our data suggest that TAp63 and p53 are required for proper keratinocyte proliferation at the base of breeding tubercles, as well as for cornification-like differentiation processes in upper layers.
TAp63 and p53 act via Notch signalling and caspase 3
In light of their known roles in keratinocyte differentiation in mouse [39], we also explored the involvement of Notch signalling and caspase 3 during zebrafish tubercle development, as well as their epistatic relationships to TAp63/p53. Differentiating tubercle keratinocytes displayed strong Notch signalling, as revealed by Tg(TP1bglob:eGFP)um13, a transgenic in vivo reporter with 12 RBP-Jk binding sites [63], which was strongly expressed in upper layers of breeding tubercles, but not in lower layers and regular epidermis, complementary to the distribution of (ΔN)p63 (Figure 8A), but overlapping with aCasp3 (Figure 8B). Double labelling with calcein blue as a marker of differentiated cap cells revealed that during development, Notch signalling in the tubercle domain is initiated several days before the first cap cells have differentiated (Figure 8C,D). Furthermore, TAp63 and p53 mutants displayed strongly reduced Notch signalling and aCasp3 levels in their (significantly smaller) tubercles at 50 dpf (Figure 8F–H,L–N), although wild-type tubercles of similar sizes at 30 dpf were strongly positive for both (Figure 8E,K).
To study whether Notch signalling and caspase 3 are required for breeding tubercle formation, we treated wild-type fish from 20 to 50 dpf with the specific Notch/g-secretase inhibitor DAPT or the caspase 3 peptide inhibitor zDEVD-fmk. While both treatments did not affect the general conditions and growth of the fish (Figure S5), DAPT-treatment caused significant reductions in the numbers and sizes of tubercles, in the activity of the Notch reporter and in aCasp3 levels (Figure 8I,O,Q), as also seen in p53 and TAp63 mutants (Figures 7F and 8G,H,M,N). zDEVD-fmk treatment had similar effects on tubercle numbers and sizes and on aCasp3 levels (Figure 8P,Q), while leaving Notch signalling unaffected (Figure 8J). Furthermore, despite the restriction of Notch signalling to upper breeding tubercle layers (see above), DAPT treatment led to a significant reduction of keratinocyte proliferation at the base of the tubercles (Figure 8R–T), comparable to the effects caused by loss of TAp63 and p53 function (Figure 7P). Finally, we re-introduced Notch signalling into TAp63 mutants, using a binary transgenic approach for temporally controlled expression of the constitutively active intracellular domain of Notch1 (NICD) [64]. While heatshock-induced NICD expression from 20–50 dpf had little effect in wild-type fish, it significantly elevated tubercle numbers in TAp63 mutants back to wild-type conditions (Figure 8U–X).
Together, these data suggest that TAp63/p53, Notch signalling and aCasp3 constitute a linear pathway required for proper breeding tubercle formation.
Discussion
Both the in vivo role of TAp63 isoforms during vertebrate keratinocyte development and the stratification status of the epidermis of adult zebrafish were not fully understood. Here, we present data shedding new light onto both questions, identifying the zebrafish breeding tubercles as epidermal appendages with more advanced stratification and keratinocyte differentiation, and with regular desquamation and self-renewal, while presenting genetic evidence for an in vivo involvement of a TAp63/p53->Notch->caspase 3 pathway in these processes.
Breeding tubercles as sites of more advanced keratinocyte differentiation and regular self-renewal
Thus far, it had been unclear whether the epidermis of adult zebrafish undergoes self-renewal as in mammals. Our transgenic lineage analyses indicate that both in regular epidermis and in breeding tubercles, derivatives of basal keratinocytes can be found in the outer cell layer (Figure 1). Furthermore, long-term observations of individual fish show that outer layers of breeding tubercles are shed off, and that it takes cells of the next layer several days to fully develop outer layer properties before they undergo desquamation themselves (Figure 4).
Electron microscopy and marker analyses further revealed striking differences in the differentiation of keratinocytes in breeding tubercles versus regular epidermis. In regular epidermis, basal and intermediary cells display largely identical ultrastructural features [12]. In addition, they are (ΔN)p63-positive and mitotically active throughout all layers, and express the same keratin genes (Figures 2 and 5). Only when ending up in the superficial layer do they become strikingly different, express specific keratins and other structural proteins, including components of tight junctions, which are only present in this layer. Strikingly, basal keratinocyte-derived superficial cells of the regular epidermis are indistinguishable from persisting cells of the early embryonic enveloping layer, with which they form a uniform and continuous periderm-like sheet (Figure 1E).
In contrast, breeding tubercles exhibit a much more pronounced stratification (see Figure 9A for schematic drawing). They consist of more epidermal cell layers and display a keratin gene expression pattern strikingly different from that of regular epidermis (Figure 2). Cell proliferation is confined to basal layers, while the expression of transglutaminase 1, a crucial cross-linking enzyme during mammalian cornification [53], which is absent in regular zebrafish epidermis, is confined to upper layers (Figures 2 and 5). Structurally, at least 4 different layer types can be distinguished. The basal layer, in which cells are organized in a much more regular and columnar fashion than in regular epidermis, several spinous layers, a second-tier layer, in which cells are sealed to each other via tight junctions, and a heavily keratinized outer cap layer (Figures 3 and 9A). This organization is similar to that of the epidermis of adult mammals. In addition, the presence of extruding lamellar body-like vesicles and of lipid deposits at the second tier – cap layer interphase is reminiscent of lipid envelope formation during mammalian cornification [54], while the progressive degradation of desmosomes between second tier and cap layer cells resembles the fate of corneodesomosomes in mammalian corneocytes [65]. However, there are also differences between zebrafish breeding tubercles and the cornifying mammalian epidermis. Thus, despite their high keratin content, tubercle keratinocytes lack obvious intermediary filament bundles and a cornified envelope (CE), in line with the absence of genes encoding the keratin-bundling protein filaggrin and the CE components loricrin and involucrin in teleost genomes [66]. Furthermore, in contrast to mammalian corneocytes, sloughed cap cells of tubercles still contain their nuclei and display some (loss of cell membrane integrity, nuclear pyknosis), but not all hallmarks of apoptosis [55], [56] (Figures 4 and 5).
Overall, this makes differentiated zebrafish tubercle keratinocytes more similar to the “immature horny cells with nuclei” observed in fetal human epidermis, which are supposed to represent a “transition phase of keratinisation” [2]. In line with such a more basal state, keratinocyte differentiation in zebrafish tubercles requires Notch signalling and caspase 3, regulators that are also needed for early steps of epidermal cornification in mammals [37], [39].
A linear TAp63->Notch->caspase 3 pathway drives advanced keratinocyte development in breeding tubercles
There is compelling evidence in mouse and zebrafish that ΔNp63 is required during early steps of epidermal development, promoting the proliferation and stemness of basal keratinocytes, while possibly blocking differentiation processes [26], [58], [59]. However, the in vivo role of its counterpart TAp63 during keratinocyte development and differentiation remained elusive. Also, to our knowledge, no defects during regular keratinocyte development have been reported for p53 mutants as yet [31], [32].
Here, we revealed specific defects during keratinocyte development in breeding tubercles of zebrafish p53 and TA-specific TAp63 mutants. The used p53 allele, zdf1 (also called e7), bears a missense mutation in the DNA binding domain. Although the strongest of all available p53 mutants [57], [67], it might not be a complete functional null. However, inferences with other members of the p53/63/73 family seem very unlikely, as zdf1 homozygous embryos lack the phenotypes caused by loss of p63 or p73 [58], [59], [61], [67]. Antimorphic effects are also unlikely for the used TAp63 allele, hu2525, as the mRNA and the resulting truncated protein seem to be unstable (Figure 6P,Q). Furthermore, the protein would only contain part of the transactivating domain, while lacking DNA binding and oligomerization domains (Figure 6A). Therefore, we conclude that both TAp63 and p53 are per se essential for normal breeding tubercle development.
Similar tubercle defects as in TAp63 and p53 mutants were obtained upon chemical inhibition of Notch signalling or caspase 3 activity (Figure 8). aCasp3 levels are strongly reduced in TAp63 and p53 mutants, as well as after loss of Notch signalling, whereas Notch signalling is only lost in TAp63 and p53 mutants, but not after inhibition of caspase 3. In addition, re-introduction of Notch signalling into TAp63 mutants rescues their tubercle deficiencies. Together with their shared expression in differentiating keratinocytes of wild-type tubercles (Figures 6E,G and 8B), this provides in vivo evidence for the presence and requirement of a linear TAp63/p53->Notch->caspase 3 pathway.
Future studies have to elucidate the genetic control of breeding tubercle formation upstream of TAp63 and p53. As previously suggested [21], we believe that TAp63/p53 activity in zebrafish tubercles is indirectly promoted via negative interferences with its antagonist ΔNp63, which in skin is present in vast excess over TAp63 (Figure 6D), but, in contrast to TAp63 (Figure 6E), most likely restricted to the base of breeding tubercles (Figure 7A). This initial inhibition of ΔNp63 production in upper layers of the tubercle anlage might be reinforced by various negative feedbacks between TAp63/Notch/caspase and ΔNp63. Thus, in mammalian epidermal keratinocytes, Notch1 has been shown to repress ΔNp63 expression [43], while TAp63 induces caspase-dependent ΔNp63 degradation [68], consistent with the observed increased ΔNp63 transcript levels in the skin (Figure 6P) and the presence of ectopic ΔNp63 protein in upper tubercle layers of TAp63 mutant zebrafish (Figure 7A,B).
The dual effect of TAp63->Notch->Caspase 3 on keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation
It might appear paradoxical that in addition to reduced keratinocyte differentiation in upper layers of breeding tubercles (Figure 7J–L), loss of TAp63 or p53 function also leads to reduced keratinocyte proliferation at the base of the tubercles (Figure 7M–P), pointing to both differentiation- and proliferation-promoting effects of these regulators. Reduced tubercle growth and basal keratinocyte proliferation was also obtained upon inhibition of the TAp63/p53 mediators Notch or caspase 3 (Figure 8E–T), although both are only active in post-mitotic keratinocytes in upper tubercle layers (Figure 8A,B), pointing to non-cell autonomous mitogenic effects. Interestingly, in regenerating wings of the fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster, the enzymatic activity of the caspase Dronc generated in apoptotic cells does not only execute cell death in a cell-autonomous manner, but also promotes proliferation of adjacent cells even when Dronc-positive cells are prevented from dying, pointing to the presence of a Dronc-dependent mitogenic signal that acts in an apoptosis-independent and non-cell autonomous manner [48], [69]. It is tempting to speculate that a similar mechanism might be at play in breeding tubercles, in which a TAp63/p53->Notch->caspase 3 pathway active in upper epidermal layers, while cell-autonomously promoting terminal keratinocyte differentiation, enhances proliferation of cells in lower layers in a paracrine fashion (via an unknown secreted factor X; Figure 9B), accounting for proper tubercle growth during development and for proper balancing between cell loss via desquamation and cell renewal during tissue homeostasis [70]. Such a proliferation-stimulating role seems in contrast to the known functions of Notch and p53 as tumour suppressors [71], [72]. However, it is in line with the initial identification of p53 as an oncogene [73] and its more recently described function in the context of metabolic control [74].
Why TAp63 mouse mutants might lack overt defects during epidermal development
The breeding tubercle phenotype of zebrafish TAp63 and p53 mutants is not fully penetrant and variable in strength. Interestingly, however, phenotypic penetrance and average strength are significantly higher in TAp63/p53 double mutants, suggesting that the two structurally related transcription factors play partially redundant roles. Although other reasons cannot be ruled out, this suggests that a similar, possibly even more pronounced functional redundancy might also account for the apparent absence of epidermal defects in TA-specific p63 mutant mice [34]–[36]. Of note, we even identified a few TAp63/p53 double mutant zebrafish in which breeding tubercles were not completely lost. This could be due to some remaining p53 activity (see above). In addition, it might point to the existence of further partially redundant factors. TAp73, the third member of the family, is a candidate, which in mouse is expressed in all examined tissues and required side by side with TAp63 in oocytes to prevent genomic instability and female infertility [24], [34], [75]. Particular ΔNp63 isoforms might also be involved. Although in most cases they have dominant negative effects on TAp63 isoforms and p53, acting as transcriptional repressors, cases have been reported where they transactivate target genes [27] and positively cooperate with p53 [29].
Together, this demonstrates the complexity of the p53/p63/p73 system of transcriptional regulation, while revealing that it can be helpful to perform genetic analyses in different in vivo model systems, taking advantage of variations that have occurred during vertebrate evolution.
Materials and Methods
Zebrafish lines and genotyping
Unless stated otherwise, wild-type fish from a mixture of TL and EK were used. The mutant Tp63hu2525 (S48X) line was generated upon our request in the Hubrecht Institute, NL, using target-selected mutagenesis (TILLING) [62]. The stable transgenic lines Tg(krt4:creERt2)fr33, Tg(krt19:dTomato)fr34 and Tg(krt19:creERt2)fr35 were generated using the Tol2 kit [76], [77] with the described krt4 [49] or krttc19e [50] (here abbreviated as krt19) promoter fragments for construct generation, followed by standard injection and screening procedures.
The mutant line Tp53zdf1 (M214K) [57] and the transgenic lines Tg(krt4:GFP)gz7 [49], Tg(actb2:loxP-STOP-loxP-dsREDEx)sd5 [78], Tg(TP1bglob:eGFP)um13 [63], Tg(5xUAS-E1b:6xMYC-notch1a)kca3 [64] and Tg(-1.5hsp70l:Gal4)kca4 [63] have been previously described. For NICD expression, Tg(5xUAS-E1b:6xMYC-notch1a), Tg(-1.5hsp70l:Gal4)kca4 double transgenic fish were heat-shocked from 20–50 dpf once a day for 1 hour at 40°C.
The TAp63hu2525 allele was genotyped using the dCAPS (derived Cleaved Amplified Polymorphism Sequence) method [79] with PCR primers CTGACCCCGAGGTTGTCTAA (sense) and TGCTAATCTGTATAGTATTGGAAGCT (antisense) and subsequent HindIII digest. The Tp53zdf1 allele was identified via an RFLP (Restriction fragment length polymorphism) genotyping assay with PCR primers CCAGAGTATGTTCTGTCCA (sense) and TGATTGTGAGGATGGGCCTGCGGAATC (antisense) and subsequent BstyI restriction digest.
Fish carrying the Tg(-1.5hsp70l:Gal4)kca4 or Tg(5xUAS-E1b:6xMYC-notch1a)kca3 transgene were identified by PCR transgene amplification with the primers CGGGCATTTTACTTTTATGTTGC (gal4, sense), CATCATTAGCGTCGGTGAG (gal4 antisense), CATCGCGTCTCAGCCTCAC (NICD sense), CGGAATCGTTTATTGGTGTCG primer (NICD antisense), yielding a 1.2 or 0.3 kb amplification product, respectively.
All zebrafish experiments were approved by the national animal care committees (LANUV Nordrhein-Westfalen; 8.87-50.10.31.08.129; 84-02.04.2012.A251; City of Cologne; 576.1.36.6.3.01.10 Be) and the University of Cologne
Lineage tracing
Tg(krt19:creERT2)fr35, Tg(actb2:loxP-STOP-loxP-dsREDEx)sd5 double transgenic, Tg(krt19:creERT2)fr35, Tg(actb2:loxP-STOP-loxP-dsREDEx)sd5, Tg(krt4:GFP)gz7 triple transgenic, or Tg(krt4:creERT2)fr33, Tg(actb2:loxP-STOP-loxP-dsREDEx)sd5; Tg(krt4:GFP)gz7 triple transgenic embryos were treated with 5 µM 4-Hydroxytamoxifen (Sigma Aldrich; H7904) in the dark at 28°C from 24 hpf to 96 hpf before being returned to normal system conditions for growing up. For Figure 1A–D, larvae or adult fish were fixed with 4% paraformaledehyde (PFA)/PBS overnight at 4°C, followed by cryosectioning, mounting of sections in Mowiol (Carl Roth) containing DAPI and fluorophore analysis with a Zeiss Apotome. For Figure 1E fish were stained with rabbit anti-RFP (1∶100; MBL, PM005) (secondary = Alexa Fluor-488 anti-rabbit (1∶100; Invitrogen, A11008)), mouse anti-p63 (1∶100, Santa Cruz, sc-8431) (secondary = Alexa Fluor-647 anti-mouse (1∶100; Invitrogen, A21240)) and Rhodamine-Phalloidin (1∶100, Invitrogen, R415), and analyzed via confocal microcopy (Zeiss LSM710 Meta).
Tissue-labelling procedures
Epidermal cell proliferation was assessed by BrdU incorporation after incubating adult fish in 100 µg/ml BrdU (Sigma) in fish system water for 12 or 24 hours, followed by anti-BrdU immunolabelling. TUNEL assay was performed using the in situ Cell Death Detection Kit, POD (Roche) according to the manufacturers recommendations.
For in vivo calcein staining, fish were incubated for two hours in calcein green or calcein blue solution (100 mg/l; Sigma Aldrich). After extensive washings, fish were anaesthetized with Tricaine (ethyl-3-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate, Fluka) for fluorescence analysis of live whole mounts or after PFA fixation and cryosectioning.
For histological, immunofluorescence and in situ hybridization analyses, adult zebrafish were sacrificed by Tricaine overdose and fixed in 4% PFA overnight at 4°C. Samples for paraffin embedding were decalcified in 0.5 M EDTA (pH 7.4) at room temperature for 5 days, dehydrated in a graded series of alcohols, cleared in Roti-Histol (Carl Roth) and embedded in paraffin wax. 10 µm sections were cut using a Leica RM2255 microtome. Samples for cryosections were orientated in 15% sucrose with 1% agarose in PBS and mounted in tissue freezing medium (Leica). 10 or 12 µm sections were obtained using a Leica CM1850 cryostat.
Paraffin sections were stained with hematoxylin & eosin or acidic fuchsin orange G (AFOG) trichrome (Gennova) according to standard protocols. For immunofluorescence analysis of paraffin- or cryosections, antigen retrieval was performed with 10 mM sodium citrate (pH 6.0) at 70°C for two hours, followed by washes and primary and secondary antibody incubations in PBS supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), and mounting of sections in Mowiol containing DAPI. Primary antibodies other from the ones described above were: rabbit anti-activated caspase3 (1∶1000, abcam ab-13847), mouse anti-BrdU (1∶200, Roche 1170376), mouse anti-pan Keratin Type II (1∶200, Progen 61006). Secondary antibodies used were: anti-mouse Cy3 (1∶1000, Invitrogen), anti-rabbit Cy3 (1∶1000, Invitrogen), Alexa Fluor-488 anti-rabbit (1∶1000, Invitrogen)
In situ hybridization on paraffin sections was performed according to [80]. Antisense RNA probes were generated via in vitro transcription with Dig RNA labelling mix (Roche) and the following templates and conditions: krt8 (GenBank BI875660): 1.8 kb cDNA fragment cloned from EST into pBluescript SK, linearization with HindIII, transcription with T3 RNA polymerase; cki (GenBank AF197880): 0.6 kb fragment in pSPORT, EcoRI, SP6 RNA pol; krt5 (GenBank AF197909): 0.4 kb fragment in pBluescript SK, KpnI, T3 RNA pol; krt17 (ZFIN-ID zgc:92061; GenBank BI850052): 1.5 kb fragment in pSPORT, EcoRI, SP6 RNA pol. For krtt1c11a and tgm1, 1.0 kb fragments were amplified via RT-PCR and cloned into pGMTeasy (Promega) (krtt1c11a: SpeI, T7 RNA pol) or pCRII (tgm1: XhoI, SP6 RNA pol). For a TA-specific TAp63 probe, a 408 bp TA1 cDNA fragment was amplified via RT-PCR with the primers 5′-CAGGGGCTAGCTTCTAGTGG-3′ (sense) and 5′-TGTAAGGGGCTCCTCAGGCTC-3′ (antisense) and cloned into pGEMTeasy. The plasmid was digested with SpeI and transcribed with SP6 RNA pol for antisense, and with NcoI and T7 RNA pol for sense probe. For p53, EST clone MPMGp609B127Q8 with the full-length p53 cDNA in pSPORTI was linearized with EcoRI and transcribed with SP6 RNA pol for antisense, and with BamHI and T7 RNA pol for sense probe.
Images were captured on a Zeiss Axiophot, Zeiss Apotome, Zeiss Confocal (LSM710 META) or Leica M165 FC stereo microscope.
Electron microscopy
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of adult zebrafish was carried out as described [81]. For Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), adult fish were sacrificed and fixed overnight in 4% PFA at 4°C, dehydrated and either cryo-fixed, sputter-coated (gold/palladium) and transferred onto the SEM cryo-stage while still frozen, or critical point dried (CPD), sputter-coated and evaluated at room temperature.
Chemical treatments
Fish were raised from 20–50 dpf in E3-medium containing 100 µg/ml of the γ-secretase inhibitor DAPT (N-N-(3,5-difluorophenacetyl)-L-alanyl)-S-phenylglycien t-butylester; Sigma-Aldrich 208255) [82], 5 µg/ml of the caspase 3 peptide inhibitor z-DEVD-fmk (Calbiochem 264155-80) [83] or 0.2% DMSO as control. Standard length (SL) of the fish was used to control equal development of each group.
RT-PCR and RFLP analysis
RNA of whole zebrafish embryos at different developmental time points or from isolated tissues or organs of adults was isolated using the trizol reagent (Invitrogen). cDNA was generated using random hexamer primers. Regular PCR was carried out with the TA-specific sense primers TAS1-3 or the ΔN-specific sense primer ΔNs (see Figure S1), combined with a shared reverse primer 5-GTGACTGGGTGGGGCTATTT-3. Zebrafish actb2 (GenBank: BC0675676) specific primers were used as control (sense, 5′-AGTTTGAGTCGGCGTGAAGT-3′; antisense, 5′-AGGCTGTGCTGTCCCTGTAT-3′). PCR reactions were performed with an annealing temperature of 55°C for 35 cycles.
For cDNA RFLP analysis, the 629 bp fragment shown in Figure 6B was amplified with primers TA3 and the reverse primer 5′-GTGACTGGGTGGGGCTATTT-3′, followed by overnight digest with MboI (NEB) and electrophoresis in 4% agarose gel, revealing 379, 107, 101 and 42 bp cleavage products in wild-type, but only 279, 208 and 42 bp products in hu2525 mutant cDNA.
Quantitative RT-PCR was performed in triplicates (2 experiments each) with TaqMan primers (see below) and an Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System under default PCR conditions, resulting in specific 65 bp (TAp63; shared by TA1 and TA4) and 72 bp (ΔNp63) products. Used primers were: TA-forward, 5′-GCCTGAGGAGCCCCTTACA-3′; ΔN-forward, 5′-CCAATGCTCCCTCATCCTACA-3′, TA-reverse and ΔN-reverse, 5′-CATTTTGATCCATGCTGTTGAGA-3′; TA-TaqMan probe, 5′-CTCAGTATACAAGCCTGGG-3′; ΔN-TaqMan probe, 5′-AGCCTCAGTATACAAGCC-3′; standard, rps23 (ribosomal protein S23; standard; Applied Biosystems; Dr.0343030371m1). Amplification efficiencies were determined with a dilution series of cDNA from adult skin, and were above 95% for all three amplificants (TAp63, 99,4%; ΔNp63, 95.9%; rps23, 95.2%). Data were analyzed using Biosystems Prism SDS and Excel software, applying ΔCT and ΔΔCT calculations.
Generation of expression constructs, mRNA synthesis and microinjection
To generate the TAp63 expression constructs pCS2-TA(1)p63γ and pCS2-TA(4)p63γ, a replacement strategy was used, amplifying the N-terminal fragments of the TA1 and TA4 isoforms of TAp63 via RT-PCR from adult skin of wild-type and hu2525 mutants with forward primers 5′-TTGGATCCACCATGACCTCTCCTTATGCAGC-3′ (TA1) or 5′-TTGGATCCACCATGTCACAGGGCCAGGGCTC-3′ (TA4), and reverse primer 5′-GTGACTGGGTGGGGCTATTT-3′, followed by BamH1/BspM1 digest and cloning into BamH1/BspM1-digested pCS2-ΔNp63γ [58]. To generate expression constructs for TAp63 with six N-terminal Myc tags, TAp63γ coding sequences were amplified from wild-type and hu2525 mutant pCS2-TA(4)p63γ plasmids with primers 5′-CGAATTCAACCATGTCACAGGGCCAGGGCTC-3′ (sense) and 5′- TTTCTAGATCACACTGATTGAGAACTCTTTTT G-3′ (antisense), digested with EcoRI and XbaI, and cloned into EcoRI/XbaI digested pCS2-MT (www.addgene.org/vector-database/2296/). For expression constructs with six C-terminal Myc tags, amplification was performed with primers 5′-TTGGATCCACCATGTCACAGGGCCAGGGCTC-3′ (sense) and 5′-CGATCGATTCACTGATTGAGAACTCTTTTTGTC-3′, followed by digestion with BamHI and ClaI, and cloning into BamHI/ClaI, digested pCS2-MT.
Capped RNA was prepared after restriction digest of these expression constructs or pCS2-ΔNp63α1 [58] with KpnI, using the Message Machine kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). RNA was dissolved in water, and 1 nl per embryo injected. TAp63γ mRNAs were injected at a concentration of 10 ng/µl, 6xMyc-TAp63γ mRNAs at a concentration of 5 ng/µl, and ΔNp63α1 mRNA at a concentration of 25 ng/µl. Apoptosis and resulting embryonic death or embryonic malformations were scored at 8 hpf and 24 hpf, respectively, ΔNp63α1-induced loss of eyes at 32 hpf, as described [58].
Immunoblotting
Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated and deyolked, and cells were collected as described [84]. Cell pellets or adult tissues were either directly dissolved in SDS loading buffer as described [84], or first lysed in chilled CSH buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 250 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton-X100, supplemented with cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail, Roche), followed by protein concentration determination. 10–12% SDS-PAGE, blotting on nitrocellulose membrane, Ponceau staining and immunodetection were carried out as described [84]. Used primary antibodies were: anti-Myc, 9B11 (mouse, Cell Signaling Technology; 1∶2000); anti-p63, 4A4 (mouse, Santa Cruz Technologies, against aa 1–205 of human ΔNp63), D-9 (mouse, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, against aa 15–151 of human ΔNp63), H-137 (rabbit, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, against aa 15–151 of human ΔNp63), H-129 (rabbit, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, against aa 513–641 at C-terminus of human TAp63α).
Supporting Information
Zdroje
1. NakamuraH, YasudaM (1979) An electron microscopic study of periderm cell development in mouse limb buds. Anat Embryol (Berl) 157: 121–132.
2. HolbrookKA, OdlandGF (1975) The fine structure of developing human epidermis: light, scanning, and transmission electron microscopy of the periderm. J Invest Dermatol 65: 16–38.
3. ByrneC, TainskyM, FuchsE (1994) Programming gene expression in developing epidermis. Development 120: 2369–2383.
4. HardmanMJ, MooreL, FergusonMW, ByrneC (1999) Barrier formation in the human fetus is patterned. J Invest Dermatol 113: 1106–1113.
5. KosterMI, RoopDR (2004) The role of p63 in development and differentiation of the epidermis. J Dermatol Sci 34: 3–9.
6. KosterMI, RoopDR (2007) Mechanisms regulating epithelial stratification. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 23: 93–113.
7. WilliamsML, HanleyK, EliasPM, FeingoldKR (1998) Ontogeny of the epidermal permeability barrier. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc 3: 75–79.
8. AlibardiL (2003) Adaptation to the land: The skin of reptiles in comparison to that of amphibians and endotherm amniotes. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 298: 12–41.
9. WuP, HouL, PlikusM, HughesM, ScehnetJ, et al. (2004) Evo-Devo of amniote integuments and appendages. Int J Dev Biol 48: 249–270.
10. KimmelCB, WargaRM, SchillingTF (1990) Origin and organization of the zebrafish fate map. Development 108: 581–594.
11. FukazawaC, SantiagoC, ParkKM, DeeryWJ, Gomez de la Torre CannyS, et al. (2010) poky/chuk/ikk1 is required for differentiation of the zebrafish embryonic epidermis. Dev Biol 346: 272–283.
12. Le GuellecD, Morvan-DuboisG, SireJY (2004) Skin development in bony fish with particular emphasis on collagen deposition in the dermis of the zebrafish (Danio rerio). Int J Dev Biol 48: 217–231.
13. RichardsonR, SlanchevK, KrausC, KnyphausenP, EmingS, et al. (2013) Adult zebrafish as a model system for cutaneous wound healing research. J Invest Dermatol 133: 1655–1665.
14. Whitear M (1986) The skin of fishes including Cyclostomes: epidermis. In: Bereiter-Hahn J, Matoltsy AG, Richards KS, editors. Biology of the Integument 2: Vertebrates. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag,: 8–38.
15. CandiE, SchmidtR, MelinoG (2005) The cornified envelope: a model of cell death in the skin. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 328–340.
16. MackJA, AnandS, MaytinEV (2005) Proliferation and cornification during development of the mammalian epidermis. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 75: 314–329.
17. ProkschE, BrandnerJM, JensenJM (2008) The skin: an indispensable barrier. Exp Dermatol 17: 1063–1072.
18. YangA, KaghadM, WangY, GillettE, FlemingMD, et al. (1998) p63, a p53 homolog at 3q27-29, encodes multiple products with transactivating, death-inducing, and dominant-negative activities. Mol Cell 2: 305–316.
19. MillsAA, ZhengB, WangXJ, VogelH, RoopDR, et al. (1999) p63 is a p53 homologue required for limb and epidermal morphogenesis. Nature 398: 708–713.
20. YangA, SchweitzerR, SunD, KaghadM, WalkerN, et al. (1999) p63 is essential for regenerative proliferation in limb, craniofacial and epithelial development. Nature 398: 714–718.
21. YangA, McKeonF (2000) P63 and P73: P53 mimics, menaces and more. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 1: 199–207.
22. KingKE, WeinbergWC (2007) p63: defining roles in morphogenesis, homeostasis, and neoplasia of the epidermis. Mol Carcinog 46: 716–724.
23. CrumCP, McKeonFD (2010) p63 in epithelial survival, germ cell surveillance, and neoplasia. Annu Rev Pathol 5: 349–371.
24. DötschV, BernassolaF, CoutandinD, CandiE, MelinoG (2010) p63 and p73, the ancestors of p53. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2: a004887.
25. BambergerC, SchmaleH (2001) Identification and tissue distribution of novel KET/p63 splice variants. FEBS Lett 501: 121–126.
26. RomanoRA, SmalleyK, MagrawC, SernaVA, KuritaT, et al. (2012) DeltaNp63 knockout mice reveal its indispensable role as a master regulator of epithelial development and differentiation. Development 139: 772–782.
27. KingKE, PonnamperumaRM, YamashitaT, TokinoT, LeeLA, et al. (2003) deltaNp63alpha functions as both a positive and a negative transcriptional regulator and blocks in vitro differentiation of murine keratinocytes. Oncogene 22: 3635–3644.
28. KingKE, PonnamperumaRM, GerdesMJ, TokinoT, YamashitaT, et al. (2006) Unique domain functions of p63 isotypes that differentially regulate distinct aspects of epidermal homeostasis. Carcinogenesis 27: 53–63.
29. TruongAB, KretzM, RidkyTW, KimmelR, KhavariPA (2006) p63 regulates proliferation and differentiation of developmentally mature keratinocytes. Genes Dev 20: 3185–3197.
30. CandiE, RufiniA, TerrinoniA, DinsdaleD, RanalliM, et al. (2006) Differential roles of p63 isoforms in epidermal development: selective genetic complementation in p63 null mice. Cell Death Differ 13: 1037–1047.
31. YugawaT, HandaK, Narisawa-SaitoM, OhnoS, FujitaM, et al. (2007) Regulation of Notch1 gene expression by p53 in epithelial cells. Mol Cell Biol 27: 3732–3742.
32. Guinea-ViniegraJ, ZenzR, ScheuchH, JimenezM, BakiriL, et al. (2012) Differentiation-induced skin cancer suppression by FOS, p53, and TACE/ADAM17. J Clin Invest 122: 2898–2910.
33. TruongAB, KhavariPA (2007) Control of keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation by p63. Cell Cycle 6: 295–299.
34. SuhEK, YangA, KettenbachA, BambergerC, MichaelisAH, et al. (2006) p63 protects the female germ line during meiotic arrest. Nature 444: 624–628.
35. GuoX, KeyesWM, PapazogluC, ZuberJ, LiW, et al. (2009) TAp63 induces senescence and suppresses tumorigenesis in vivo. Nat Cell Biol 11: 1451–1457.
36. SuX, ParisM, GiYJ, TsaiKY, ChoMS, et al. (2009) TAp63 prevents premature aging by promoting adult stem cell maintenance. Cell Stem Cell 5: 64–75.
37. BlanpainC, LowryWE, PasolliHA, FuchsE (2006) Canonical notch signaling functions as a commitment switch in the epidermal lineage. Genes Dev 20: 3022–3035.
38. WattFM, EstrachS, AmblerCA (2008) Epidermal Notch signalling: differentiation, cancer and adhesion. Curr Opin Cell Biol 20: 171–179.
39. OkuyamaR, NguyenBC, TaloraC, OgawaE, Tommasi di VignanoA, et al. (2004) High commitment of embryonic keratinocytes to terminal differentiation through a Notch1-caspase 3 regulatory mechanism. Dev Cell 6: 551–562.
40. RangarajanA, TaloraC, OkuyamaR, NicolasM, MammucariC, et al. (2001) Notch signaling is a direct determinant of keratinocyte growth arrest and entry into differentiation. Embo J 20: 3427–3436.
41. EstrachS, CordesR, HozumiK, GosslerA, WattFM (2008) Role of the Notch ligand Delta1 in embryonic and adult mouse epidermis. J Invest Dermatol 128: 825–832.
42. SasakiY, IshidaS, MorimotoI, YamashitaT, KojimaT, et al. (2002) The p53 family member genes are involved in the Notch signal pathway. J Biol Chem 277: 719–724.
43. NguyenBC, LefortK, MandinovaA, AntoniniD, DevganV, et al. (2006) Cross-regulation between Notch and p63 in keratinocyte commitment to differentiation. Genes Dev 20: 1028–1042.
44. LefortK, MandinovaA, OstanoP, KolevV, CalpiniV, et al. (2007) Notch1 is a p53 target gene involved in human keratinocyte tumor suppression through negative regulation of ROCK1/2 and MRCKalpha kinases. Genes Dev 21: 562–577.
45. CandiE, RufiniA, TerrinoniA, Giamboi-MiragliaA, LenaAM, et al. (2007) DeltaNp63 regulates thymic development through enhanced expression of FgfR2 and Jag2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 11999–12004.
46. YugawaT, Narisawa-SaitoM, YoshimatsuY, HagaK, OhnoS, et al. (2010) DeltaNp63alpha repression of the Notch1 gene supports the proliferative capacity of normal human keratinocytes and cervical cancer cells. Cancer Res 70: 4034–4044.
47. OkuyamaR, TagamiH, AibaS (2008) Notch signaling: its role in epidermal homeostasis and in the pathogenesis of skin diseases. J Dermatol Sci 49: 187–194.
48. LamkanfiM, FestjensN, DeclercqW, Vanden BergheT, VandenabeeleP (2007) Caspases in cell survival, proliferation and differentiation. Cell Death Differ 14: 44–55.
49. GongZ, JuB, WangX, HeJ, WanH, et al. (2002) Green fluorescent protein expression in germ-line transmitted transgenic zebrafish under a stratified epithelial promoter from keratin8. Dev Dyn 223: 204–215.
50. LeeRTH, AsharaniPV, CarneyTJ (2014) Basal keratinocytes contribute to all strata of the adult zebrafish epidermis. PLoS One e84858 doi []10.1371journal.pone.0084858 In Press/journal.pone.0084858 [In Press]
51. PadhiBK, AkimenkoMA, EkkerM (2006) Independent expansion of the keratin gene family in teleostean fish and mammals: an insight from phylogenetic analysis and radiation hybrid mapping of keratin genes in zebrafish. Gene 368: 37–45.
52. DeaseyS, GrichenkoO, DuS, NurminskayaM (2011) Characterization of the transglutaminase gene family in zebrafish and in vivo analysis of transglutaminase-dependent bone mineralization. Amino Acids 42: 1065–1075.
53. MatsukiM, YamashitaF, Ishida-YamamotoA, YamadaK, KinoshitaC, et al. (1998) Defective stratum corneum and early neonatal death in mice lacking the gene for transglutaminase 1 (keratinocyte transglutaminase). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 1044–1049.
54. MadisonKC (2003) Barrier function of the skin: “la raison d'etre” of the epidermis. J Invest Dermatol 121: 231–241.
55. PyatiUJ, LookAT, HammerschmidtM (2007) Zebrafish as a powerful vertebrate model system for in vivo studies of cell death. Semin Cancer Biol 17: 154–165.
56. GalluzziL, VitaleI, AbramsJM, AlnemriES, BaehreckeEH, et al. (2012) Molecular definitions of cell death subroutines: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2012. Cell Death Differ 19: 107–120.
57. BerghmansS, MurpheyRD, WienholdsE, NeubergD, KutokJL, et al. (2005) tp53 mutant zebrafish develop malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 407–412.
58. BakkersJ, HildM, KramerC, Furutani-SeikiM, HammerschmidtM (2002) Zebrafish DeltaNp63 is a direct target of Bmp signaling and encodes a transcriptional repressor blocking neural specification in the ventral ectoderm. Dev Cell 2: 617–627.
59. LeeH, KimelmanD (2002) A dominant-negative form of p63 is required for epidermal proliferation in zebrafish. Dev Cell 2: 607–616.
60. LaurikkalaJ, MikkolaML, JamesM, TummersM, MillsAA, et al. (2006) p63 regulates multiple signalling pathways required for ectodermal organogenesis and differentiation. Development 133: 1553–1563.
61. RentzschF, KramerC, HammerschmidtM (2003) Specific and conserved roles of TAp73 during zebrafish development. Gene 323: 19–30.
62. WienholdsE, van EedenF, KostersM, MuddeJ, PlasterkRH, et al. (2003) Efficient target-selected mutagenesis in zebrafish. Genome Res 13: 2700–2707.
63. ParsonsMJ, PisharathH, YusuffS, MooreJC, SiekmannAF, et al. (2009) Notch-responsive cells initiate the secondary transition in larval zebrafish pancreas. Mech Dev 126: 898–912.
64. ScheerN, Campos-OrtegaJA (1999) Use of the Gal4-UAS technique for targeted gene expression in the zebrafish. Mech Dev 80: 153–158.
65. CaubetC, JoncaN, BrattsandM, GuerrinM, BernardD, et al. (2004) Degradation of corneodesmosome proteins by two serine proteases of the kallikrein family, SCTE/KLK5/hK5 and SCCE/KLK7/hK7. J Invest Dermatol 122: 1235–1244.
66. VanhoutteghemA, DjianP, GreenH (2008) Ancient origin of the gene encoding involucrin, a precursor of the cross-linked envelope of epidermis and related epithelia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 15481–15486.
67. SidiS, SandaT, KennedyRD, HagenAT, JetteCA, et al. (2008) Chk1 suppresses a caspase-2 apoptotic response to DNA damage that bypasses p53, Bcl-2, and caspase-3. Cell 133: 864–877.
68. WuNL, LeeTA, TsaiTL, LinWW (2011) TRAIL-induced keratinocyte differentiation requires caspase activation and p63 expression. J Invest Dermatol 131: 874–883.
69. HuhJR, GuoM, HayBA (2004) Compensatory proliferation induced by cell death in the Drosophila wing disc requires activity of the apical cell death caspase Dronc in a nonapoptotic role. Curr Biol 14: 1262–1266.
70. BlanpainC, FuchsE (2009) Epidermal homeostasis: a balancing act of stem cells in the skin. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10: 207–217.
71. RatushnyV, GoberMD, HickR, RidkyTW, SeykoraJT (2012) From keratinocyte to cancer: the pathogenesis and modeling of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Invest 122: 464–472.
72. NicolasM, WolferA, RajK, KummerJA, MillP, et al. (2003) Notch1 functions as a tumor suppressor in mouse skin. Nat Genet 33: 416–421.
73. ReichNC, LevineAJ (1984) Growth regulation of a cellular tumour antigen, p53, in nontransformed cells. Nature 308: 199–201.
74. MaddocksOD, BerkersCR, MasonSM, ZhengL, BlythK, et al. (2013) Serine starvation induces stress and p53-dependent metabolic remodelling in cancer cells. Nature 493: 542–546.
75. TomasiniR, TsuchiharaK, WilhelmM, FujitaniM, RufiniA, et al. (2008) TAp73 knockout shows genomic instability with infertility and tumor suppressor functions. Genes Dev 22: 2677–2691.
76. KwanKM, FujimotoE, GrabherC, MangumBD, HardyME, et al. (2007) The Tol2kit: a multisite gateway-based construction kit for Tol2 transposon transgenesis constructs. Dev Dyn 236: 3088–3099.
77. PetersenLK, StowersRS (2011) A Gateway MultiSite recombination cloning toolkit. PLoS One 6: e24531.
78. BertrandJY, ChiNC, SantosoB, TengS, StainierDY, et al. (2010) Haematopoietic stem cells derive directly from aortic endothelium during development. Nature 464: 108–111.
79. NeffMM, TurkE, KalishmanM (2002) Web-based primer design for single nucleotide polymorphism analysis. Trends Genet 18: 613–615.
80. MoormanAF, HouwelingAC, de BoerPA, ChristoffelsVM (2001) Sensitive nonradioactive detection of mRNA in tissue sections: novel application of the whole-mount in situ hybridization protocol. J Histochem Cytochem 49: 1–8.
81. LaueK, PogodaHM, DanielPB, van HaeringenA, AlanayY, et al. (2011) Craniosynostosis and multiple skeletal anomalies in humans and zebrafish result from a defect in the localized degradation of retinoic acid. Am J Hum Genet 89: 595–606.
82. GelingA, SteinerH, WillemM, Bally-CuifL, HaassC (2002) A gamma-secretase inhibitor blocks Notch signaling in vivo and causes a severe neurogenic phenotype in zebrafish. EMBO Rep 3: 688–694.
83. ParngC, AndersonN, TonC, McGrathP (2004) Zebrafish apoptosis assays for drug discovery. Methods Cell Biol 76: 75–85.
84. LinkV, ShevchenkoA, HeisenbergCP (2006) Proteomics of early zebrafish embryos. BMC Dev Biol 6: 1.
85. RobertsTR (1984) Unculi (Horny projections arising from single cells), an adaptive feature of the epidermis of ostariophysan fishes. Zool Scripta 11: 55–76.
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2014 Číslo 1
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- GATA6 Is a Crucial Regulator of Shh in the Limb Bud
- Large Inverted Duplications in the Human Genome Form via a Fold-Back Mechanism
- Down-Regulation of eIF4GII by miR-520c-3p Represses Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Development
- Genome Sequencing Highlights the Dynamic Early History of Dogs