Methods for Analysis of Protein‑protein and Protein‑ligand Interactions

Česká verzia

Authors: M. Ďurech; F. Trčka; B. Vojtěšek; P. Müller
Authors place of work: Regionální centrum aplikované molekulární onkologie, Masarykův onkologický ústav, Brno
Published in the journal: Klin Onkol 2014; 27(Supplementum): 75-81

Summary

In order to maintain cellular homeostasis, cellular proteins coexist in complex and variable molecular assemblies. Therefore, understanding of major physiological processes at molecular level is based on analysis of protein‑protein interaction networks. Firstly, composition of the molecular assembly has to be qualitatively analyzed. In the next step, quantitative biochemical properties of the identified protein‑protein interactions are determined. Detailed information about the protein‑protein interaction interface can be obtained by crystallographic methods. Accordingly, the insight into the molecular architecture of these protein‑protein complexes allows us to rationally design new synthetic compounds that specifically influence various physiological or pathological processes by targeted modulation of protein interactions. This review is focused on description of the most used methods applied in both qualitative and quantitative analysis of protein‑protein interactions. Co‑ immunoprecipitation and affinity co‑ precipitation are basic methods designed for qualitative analysis of protein binding partners. Further biochemical analysis of the interaction requires definition of kinetic and thermodynamic parameters. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) is used for description of affinity and kinetic profile of the interaction, fluorescence polarization (FP) method for fast determination of inhibition potential of inhibitors and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) for definition of thermodynamic parameters of the interaction (∆G, ∆H and ∆S). Besides the importance of uncovering the molecular basis of protein interactions for basic research, the same methodological approaches open new possibilities in rational design of novel therapeutic agents.

Key words:
protein interaction networks – co‑ immunoprecipitation – pull‑ down analysis – surface plasmon resonance – fluorescence polarization – isothermal titration calorimetry

This work was supported by the European Regional Development Fund and the State Budget of the Czech Republic (RECAMO, CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0101) and by MH CZ – DRO (MMCI, 00209805).

The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study.

The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE “uniform requirements” for biomedical papers.

Submitted:
31. 1. 2014

Accepted:
10. 3. 2014

Zdroje

1. Auer M, Scarborough GA, Kuhlbrandt W. Three‑ dimensional map of the plasma membrane H+–ATPase in the open conformation. Nature 1998; 392(6678): 840– 843.

2. Radzicka A, Wolfenden R. A proficient enzyme. Science 1995; 267(5194): 90– 93.

3. Rudiger H, Siebert HC, Solis D et al. Medicinal chemistry based on the sugar code: fundamentals of lectinology and experimental strategies with lectins as targets. Curr Med Chem 2000; 7(4): 389– 416.

4. Zhang Y, Cremer PS. Interactions between macromolecules and ions: the hofmeister series. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2006; 10(6): 658– 663.

5. Buijs J, Franklin GC. SPR‑ MS in functional proteomics. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 2005; 4(1): 39– 47.

6. Torreri P, Ceccarini M, Macioce P et al. Biomolecular interactions by surface plasmon resonance technology. Ann Ist Super Sanita 2005; 41(4): 437– 441.

7. Myszka DG, Jonsen MD, Graves BJ. Equilibrium analysis of high affinity interactions using BIACORE. Anal Biochem 1998; 265(2): 326– 330.

8. Morton TA, Myszka DG. Kinetic analysis of macromolecular interactions using surface plasmon resonance biosensors. Methods Enzymol 1998; 295: 268– 294.

9. Roos H, Karlsson R, Nilshans H et al. Thermodynamic analysis of protein interactions with biosensor technology. J Mol Recognit 1998; 11(1– 6): 204– 210.

10. Protein.iastate.edu [homepage on the Internet]. The Protein Facility of the Iowa State University Office of Biotechnology. BIACore seminar. Available from: http:/ / www.proteomics.iastate.edu/ seminars/ BIACore/ index.html.

11. Jameson DM, Croney JC. Fluorescence polarization: past, present and future. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 2003; 6(3): 167– 173.

12. Perrin F. Polarisation de la lumière de fluorescence. Vie moyenne des molécules dans l‘etat excité. J Phys 1926; 7(12): 390– 401.

13. Hi‑ techsci.com [homepage on the Internet]. Homepage of TgK Scientific Ltd. Available from: http:/ / www.hi‑ techsci.com/ techniques/ anisotropy/ .

14. Williamson DS, Borgognoni J, Clay A et al. Novel adenosine‑ derived inhibitors of 70 kDa heat shock protein, discovered through structure‑based design. J Med Chem 2009; 52(6): 1510– 1513. doi: 10.1021/ jm801627a.

15. Bolger R, Wiese TE, Ervin K et al. Rapid screening of environmental chemicals for estrogen receptor binding capacity. Environ Health Perspect 1998; 106(9): 551– 557.

16. Kim J, Felts S, Llauger L et al. Development of a fluorescence polarization assay for the molecular chaperone Hsp90. J Biomol Screen 2004; 9(5): 375– 381.

17. Cer RZ, Mudunuri U, Stephens R et al. IC50- to‑ Ki: a web‑based tool for converting IC50 to Ki values for inhibitors of enzyme activity and ligand binding. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37(web server issue): W441– W445. doi: 10.1093/ nar/ gkp253.

18. Cheng Y, Prusoff WH. Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. Biochem Pharmacol 1973; 22(23): 3099– 3108.

19. Munson PJ, Rodbard D. An exact correction to the „cheng‑ prusoff“ correction. J Recept Res 1988; 8(1– 4): 533– 546.

20. Sw16.im.med.umich.edu [homepage on the Internet]. Homepage of professor Shaomeng Wang. University of Michigan. Available from: http:/ / sw16.im.med.umich.edu/ software/ calc_ki/ .

21. Wiseman T, Williston S, Brandts JF et al. Rapid measurement of binding constants and heats of binding using a new titration calorimeter. Anal Biochem 1989; 179(1): 131– 137.

22. Freyer MW, Lewis EA. Isothermal titration calorimetry: experimental design, data analysis, and probing macromolecule/ ligand binding and kinetic interactions. Methods Cell Biol 2008; 84: 79– 113.

23. Milev S. Isothermal titration calorimetry: Principles and experimental design. GE Healthcare manual. Available from: http:/ / bcmp.med.harvard.edu/ sites/ bcmp.med.harvard.edu/ files/ facilities/ ITC200%20training_pdf.pdf.