Level and factors influencing the patients’ satisfaction with the pharmaceutical care in Slovakia

Česká verzia

Authors: Daniela Mináriková
Published in the journal: Čes. slov. Farm., 2015; 64, 178-183
Category: Original Articles

Summary

The patients’ satisfaction is an integral component of the provided pharmaceutical care and afactor affecting its quality. This study gives an assessment of the patients´ satisfaction with the pharmaceutical care provided by the community pharmacists in Slovakia and it identifies the factors influencing it. Atotal of 2,844 respondents from 33 community pharmacies in 23 different Slovak towns took part in the first Slovak nationwide survey during the period from October to December 2013. The survey used amodified and validated questionnaire containing 29 items from three dimensions of pharmaceutical care (Managing Therapy, Interpersonal Relationship, General Satisfaction). The results are presented in percentages and by the level of satisfaction within the following range level: positive evaluation (score 1.00 to 2.50), neutral evaluation (score 2.51 to 3.50) and negative evaluation (score 3.51 to 5.00) based on the calculated average scores from the Likert scale, which is used to express the satisfaction of respondents (1 – very satisfied, 2 – satisfied, 3 – neither satisfied, nor dissatisfied, 4 – dissatisfied, 5 – very dissatisfied). The survey showed high patients’ satisfaction with the pharmaceutical care provided by community pharmacists in Slovakia. The evaluation of all three dimensions was positive (scores ranged from 1.85 to 2.24). The proportion of respondents with positive assessments was at the least 65.4% and at the most 86.7%. Interpersonal Relationship was the most positively assessed dimension (score 1.85 ± 0.598; 86.7% of respondents reached positive evaluation, 12.3% neutral and 1.0% negative evaluation) followed by General Satisfaction (score of 2.02 ± 0.643; 71.3% of respondents reached positive evaluation, 26.5% neutral and 2.2% negative evaluation). Managing Therapy was the least positively evaluated dimension (score 2.24 ± 0.704; 65.4% of respondents reached positive evaluation, 31.1% neutral and 3.5% negative evaluation). Age, level of education, number of patronized pharmacies, number of medicines, financial expenses in pharmacies and the region had astatistically significant impact on the evaluation of the patients’ satisfaction in all three dimensions (p < 0.001). Gender had no statistically significant effect on satisfaction rating in either of the monitored dimensions (Managing Therapy p = 0,17; Interpersonal Relationship p = 0.002; General Satisfaction p = 0.022). Long-term use of medicines had no significant effect on satisfaction in Managing Therapy (p = 0.170), either. The evaluation of the patients’ satisfaction requires further improvement and the analysis of the influence of identified factors which can determine it.

Key words:
patients’ satisfaction • community pharmacy • quality of pharmaceutical care • factors influencing the patients’ satisfaction

Zdroje

1. Fenton J. J., Jerant A. F., Bertakis K. D., Franks P. The cost of satisfaction: A national study of patient satisfaction, health care utilization, expenditures, and mortality. Arch Intern Med. 2012; 172, 405–411.

2. Cleary P. D., McNeil B. J. Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care. Inquiry 1988; 25, 25–36.

3. Albert G., Hoogstraten J. Satisfaction as a determinant of compliance. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1998; 26, 139–146.

4. Kane R. L., Maciejewski M., Finch M. The relationship of patient satisfaction with care and clinical outcomes. Med Care 1997; 35, 714–730.

5. Ware J. E., Davies A. E. Behavioral consequences of consumer dissatisfaction with medical care. Eval Program Plan 1983; 6, 291–297.

6. Lee D. S., Tu J. V., Chong A., Alter D. A. Patient Satisfaction and Its Relationship With Quality and Outcomes of Care After Acute Myocardial Infarction, Circulation 2008; 118, 1938–1945.

7. Volmer D., Bell J. S., Janno R., Raal A., Hamilton D. D., Airaksinen M. S. Change in public satisfaction with community pharmacy services in Tartu, Estonia, between 1993 and 2005. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2009; 5, 337–346.

8. Marquis M. S., Davies A. R., Ware J. E. Jr. Patient satisfaction and change in medical care provider: a longitudinal study. Med Care 1983; 21, 821–829.

9. Ross C. K., Frommelt G., Hazelwood L., Chang R. W. The role of expectations in patient satisfaction with medical care. J Health Care Mark 1987; 7, 16–26.

10. Kucukarslan S., Schommer J. C. Patients’ expectations and their satisfaction with pharmacy services. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2002; 42, 489–496.

11. Hall J., Dornan M. Meta-analysis of satisfaction with medical care: description of research domain and analysis of overall satisfaction levels. Soc Sci Med. 1998; 27, 637–644.

12. Hall J. A., Durnan M. C. Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care: a metaanalysis. Soc Sci Med. 1990; 30, 811–818.

13. Alturki M., Khan T. M. A study investigating the level of satisfaction with the health services provided by the Pharmacist at ENT hospital, Eastern Region Alahsah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Pharm J. 2013; 21, 255–260.

14. Villako P., Raal A. A survey of Estonian consumer expectations from the pharmacy service and a comparison with the opinions of pharmacists. Pharm World Sci. 2007; 29, 546–550.

15. Mináriková D., Malovecká I., Foltán V., Lehocká Ľ., Snopková M. Pohľad na poskytovanie starostlivosti v oblasti liekov na Slovensku – lekárnik a pacient. Ces. slov. Farm. 2013; 62, 276–284.

16. Larson L. N., MacKeigan L. D. Further validation of an instrument to measure patient satisfaction with pharmacy services. J Pharm Mark Manage 1994; 8, 125–139.

17. Larson L. N., Rovers J., MacKeigan L. Patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical care: Update of a validated instrument. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2002; 42, 44–50.

18. MacKeigan L. D, Larson, L. Development and validation of an instrument to measure patient satisfaction with pharmacy services. Med Care 1989; 27, 522–536.

19. Traverso M., MacKeigan L. D. Instruments for measuring patient satisfaction with pharmacy services in the spanish language. Pharm World Sci. 2005; 27, 281–284.

20. Sitzia, J. How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies. Int J Qual Health Care 1999; 11, 319–328.

21. MacKinnon, N. J. Striving beyond patient satisfaction: A roadmap for pharmacists [online] [cit. 2014-02-25], http://www.inetce.com/articles/pdf/221-999-05-007-H04.pdf

22. Waszyk-Nowaczyk M., Nowaczyk P., Simon M. Physicians’ and patients’ valuation of pharmaceutical care implementation in Poznan (Poland) community pharmacies. Saudi Pharm J. 2014; 22, 537–544.

23. Taerel A. E, Soroceanu V., Rais C., Stancu E. Study of quality standards application in Bucharest community pharmacies. Farmacia 2014; 62, 1082–1088.

24. Task Force on a Blueprint for Pharmacy. Blueprint for pharmacy: the vision for pharmacy 2008 [online] [cit. 2015-06-05], http://www.pharmacists.ca/content/about_cpha/whats_happening/cpha_in_action/pdf/BlueprintVision/pdf

25. Szalayová A., Skybová K., Kandilaki D., Szalay T. Analýza lekárenského trhu na Slovensku a v Českej republike: Vývoj za posledných 10 rokov, Bratislava: Health Policy Institute 2014 [online] [cit. 2015-05-20], http://www.hpi.sk/cdata/Publications/hpi_analyza_lekarenskeho_trhu.pdf

26. Malovecká I., Minarovič I., Mináriková D., Snopková M., Lehocká Ľ., Foltán V. Zdravotnícky a podnikateľský character lekárne. Čes. slov. Farm. 2014; 63, 84–89.

27. Malovecká I., Papargyris K., Mináriková D., Foltán V, Jankovská A. Prosperity of community pharmacy evaluated by gross and net profit and suggested corrective measures. 10 years study. Acta Fac. Pharm. Univ. Comen. LXII, 2015; 1, 20–24.

28. Nanos Research. Canadians trust doctors and pharmacists most. September 2009 [online] [cit. 2015-09-02], http://www.nanosresearch.com/library/polls/POLNAT-S09-T388.pdf.

29. Wirth F., Tabone F., Azzopardi L. M., Gauci M., Zarb-Adami M., Serracino-Inglott A. Consumer perception of the community pharmacist and community pharmacy services in Malta. J. Pharm. Health Serv. Res. 2011; 1, 4, doi:10.1111/j.1759-8893.2010.00034.x

30. Asadi-Lari M., Tamburini M., Gray D. Patients’ needs, satisfaction, and health related quality of life: Towards a comprehensive model. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004; 2, 32, doi:10.1186/1477-7525-2-32

31. Xu T. K. Choice of and overall satisfaction with pharmacies among a community-dwelling elderly population. Med Care 2002; 40, 1283–1293.

32. Naik Panvelkar P., Saini B., Armour C. Measurement of patient satisfaction with community pharmacy services: a review. Pharm World Sci. 2009; 3, 525–537.

33. Kelly D. V., Young S., Phillips L., Clark D. Patient attitudes regarding the role of the pharmacist and interest in expanded pharmacist services. Can. Pharm. J. (Ott) 2014; 147, 239–247.

34. El Hajj M. S., Salem S., Mansoor H. Public’s attitudes towards community pharmacy in Qatar: a pilot study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2011; 5, 405–422.

35. Kassam R., Collins J. B., Berkowitz J. Patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical care delivery in community pharmacies. Patient Prefer Adherence 2012; 6, 337–348.

36. Kamei M., Teshima K., Fukushima N., Nakamura T. Investigation of patients’ demand for community pharmacies: relationship between pharmacy services and patient satisfaction. Yakugaku Zasshi 2001; 121, 215–220.

37. Mináriková D., Malovecká I., Foltán V. Hodnotenie spokojnosti pacientov/zákazníkov s lekárenskou starostlivosťou v Bratislavskom samosprávnom kraji. Zborník z konferencie 28. 5. 2015 Bratislava „Spoločenské výzvy pre 21. storočie – socioekonomické výzvy“, UVP UK v Bratislave, ISBN 978-80-223-4000-7.