#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Silencing Is Noisy: Population and Cell Level Noise in Telomere-Adjacent Genes Is Dependent on Telomere Position and Sir2


Genetic diversity is often high at telomeres, the chromosome ends where genes are readily amplified and modified. Phenotypic diversity, e.g., growth properties under a given condition, is affected by stochastic variations in gene expression exhibited among cells in a homogenous environment. Our studies found that individual subtelomeric genes show high variability of gene expression both between cells within a single population and also between separate sub-populations. Cell-to-cell variation, termed Telomere-Adjacent Gene Expression Noise (TAGEN), affected single telomeric genes. We found that classical telomeric silencing and TAGEN are tightly linked, with both being dependent upon proximity to telomeres and the Sir2 chromatin modifying enzyme. In addition, both are coordinately regulated locally—at the DNA level: at a telomere with transcription that is continually silenced or activated, the level of expression variability is reduced. This work provides experimental support for computational work that predicted this relationship between stochastic chromatin silencing and expression plasticity at each telomere individually. Furthermore, it demonstrates that these shifts affect the degree of cell-to cell noise of telomere-adjacent loci.


Vyšlo v časopise: Silencing Is Noisy: Population and Cell Level Noise in Telomere-Adjacent Genes Is Dependent on Telomere Position and Sir2. PLoS Genet 10(7): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004436
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004436

Souhrn

Genetic diversity is often high at telomeres, the chromosome ends where genes are readily amplified and modified. Phenotypic diversity, e.g., growth properties under a given condition, is affected by stochastic variations in gene expression exhibited among cells in a homogenous environment. Our studies found that individual subtelomeric genes show high variability of gene expression both between cells within a single population and also between separate sub-populations. Cell-to-cell variation, termed Telomere-Adjacent Gene Expression Noise (TAGEN), affected single telomeric genes. We found that classical telomeric silencing and TAGEN are tightly linked, with both being dependent upon proximity to telomeres and the Sir2 chromatin modifying enzyme. In addition, both are coordinately regulated locally—at the DNA level: at a telomere with transcription that is continually silenced or activated, the level of expression variability is reduced. This work provides experimental support for computational work that predicted this relationship between stochastic chromatin silencing and expression plasticity at each telomere individually. Furthermore, it demonstrates that these shifts affect the degree of cell-to cell noise of telomere-adjacent loci.


Zdroje

1. Bar-EvenA, PaulssonJ, MaheshriN, CarmiM, O'SheaE, et al. (2006) Noise in protein expression scales with natural protein abundance. Nat Genet 38: 636–643.

2. NewmanJR, GhaemmaghamiS, IhmelsJ, BreslowDK, NobleM, et al. (2006) Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 441: 840–846.

3. RaserJM, O'SheaEK (2005) Noise in gene expression: origins, consequences, and control. Science 309: 2010–2013.

4. OctavioLM, GedeonK, MaheshriN (2009) Epigenetic and conventional regulation is distributed among activators of FLO11 allowing tuning of population-level heterogeneity in its expression. PLoS Genet 5: e1000673.

5. HerndayAD, BraatenBA, Broitman-MaduroG, EngelbertsP, LowDA (2004) Regulation of the pap epigenetic switch by CpxAR: phosphorylated CpxR inhibits transition to the phase ON state by competition with Lrp. Mol Cell 16: 537–547.

6. MaamarH, RajA, DubnauD (2007) Noise in gene expression determines cell fate in Bacillus subtilis. Science 317: 526–529.

7. SumnerER, AverySV (2002) Phenotypic heterogeneity: differential stress resistance among individual cells of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 148: 345–351.

8. AcarM, MettetalJT, van OudenaardenA (2008) Stochastic switching as a survival strategy in fluctuating environments. Nat Genet 40: 471–475.

9. LevySF, ZivN, SiegalML (2012) Bet hedging in yeast by heterogeneous, age-correlated expression of a stress protectant. PLoS Biol 10: e1001325.

10. LucaAC, MerschS, DeenenR, SchmidtS, MessnerI, et al. (2013) Impact of the 3D microenvironment on phenotype, gene expression, and EGFR inhibition of colorectal cancer cell lines. PLoS One 8: e59689.

11. EldarA, ElowitzMB (2010) Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits. Nature 467: 167–173.

12. BecskeiA, KaufmannBB, van OudenaardenA (2005) Contributions of low molecule number and chromosomal positioning to stochastic gene expression. Nat Genet 37: 937–944.

13. ElowitzMB, LevineAJ, SiggiaED, SwainPS (2002) Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297: 1183–1186.

14. McCulloughMJ, RossBC, ReadePC (1996) Candida albicans: a review of its history, taxonomy, epidemiology, virulence attributes, and methods of strain differentiation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 25: 136–144.

15. BezerraAR, SimoesJ, LeeW, RungJ, WeilT, et al. (2013) Reversion of a fungal genetic code alteration links proteome instability with genomic and phenotypic diversification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 11079–11084.

16. SelmeckiAM, DulmageK, CowenLE, AndersonJB, BermanJ (2009) Acquisition of aneuploidy provides increased fitness during the evolution of antifungal drug resistance. PLoS Genet 5: e1000705.

17. ArbourM, EppE, HoguesH, SellamA, LacroixC, et al. (2009) Widespread occurrence of chromosomal aneuploidy following the routine production of Candida albicans mutants. FEMS Yeast Res 9: 1070–1077.

18. SelmeckiA, ForcheA, BermanJ (2006) Aneuploidy and isochromosome formation in drug-resistant Candida albicans. Science 313: 367–370.

19. YonaAH, ManorYS, HerbstRH, RomanoGH, MitchellA, et al. (2012) Chromosomal duplication is a transient evolutionary solution to stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 21010–21015.

20. SionovE, ChangYC, Kwon-ChungKJ (2013) Azole Heteroresistance in Cryptococcus neoformans: Emergence of Resistant Clones with Chromosomal Disomy in the Mouse Brain during Fluconazole Treatment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57(10): 5127–30.

21. PavelkaN, RancatiG, ZhuJ, BradfordWD, SarafA, et al. (2010) Aneuploidy confers quantitative proteome changes and phenotypic variation in budding yeast. Nature 468: 321–325.

22. SelmeckiA, ForcheA, BermanJ (2010) Genomic plasticity of the human fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell 9: 991–1008.

23. Singh-BabakSD, BabakT, DiezmannS, HillJA, XieJL, et al. (2012) Global analysis of the evolution and mechanism of echinocandin resistance in Candida glabrata. PLoS Pathog 8: e1002718.

24. CowenLE, AndersonJB, KohnLM (2002) Evolution of drug resistance in Candida albicans. Annu Rev Microbiol 56: 139–165.

25. MageeBB, HubeB, WrightRJ, SullivanPJ, MageePT (1993) The genes encoding the secreted aspartyl proteinases of Candida albicans constitute a family with at least three members. Infect Immun 61: 3240–3243.

26. HubeB, StehrF, BossenzM, MazurA, KretschmarM, et al. (2000) Secreted lipases of Candida albicans: cloning, characterisation and expression analysis of a new gene family with at least ten members. Arch Microbiol 174: 362–374.

27. HoyerLL (2001) The ALS gene family of Candida albicans. Trends Microbiol 9: 176–180.

28. JacksonAP, GambleJA, YeomansT, MoranGP, SaundersD, et al. (2009) Comparative genomics of the fungal pathogens Candida dubliniensis and Candida albicans. Genome Res 19: 2231–2244.

29. ButlerG, RasmussenMD, LinMF, SantosMA, SakthikumarS, et al. (2009) Evolution of pathogenicity and sexual reproduction in eight Candida genomes. Nature 459: 657–662.

30. van het HoogM, RastTJ, MartchenkoM, GrindleS, DignardD, et al. (2007) Assembly of the Candida albicans genome into sixteen supercontigs aligned on the eight chromosomes. Genome Biol 8: R52.

31. ZhangA, PetrovKO, HyunER, LiuZ, GerberSA, et al. (2012) The Tlo proteins are stoichiometric components of Candida albicans mediator anchored via the Med3 subunit. Eukaryot Cell 11: 874–884.

32. MondouxMA, ZakianVA (2007) Subtelomeric elements influence but do not determine silencing levels at Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomeres. Genetics 177: 2541–2546.

33. GottschlingDE, AparicioOM, BillingtonBL, ZakianVA (1990) Position effect at S. cerevisiae telomeres: reversible repression of Pol II transcription. Cell 63: 751–762.

34. BlackburnEH (2001) Switching and signaling at the telomere. Cell 106: 661–673.

35. OppikoferM, KuengS, GasserSM (2013) SIR-nucleosome interactions: Structure-function relationships in yeast silent chromatin. Gene 527(1): 10–25.

36. DohenyJG, MottusR, GrigliattiTA (2008) Telomeric position effect–a third silencing mechanism in eukaryotes. PLoS One 3: e3864.

37. GreissS, GartnerA (2009) Sirtuin/Sir2 phylogeny, evolutionary considerations and structural conservation. Mol Cells 28: 407–415.

38. BelenkyP, RacetteFG, BoganKL, McClureJM, SmithJS, et al. (2007) Nicotinamide riboside promotes Sir2 silencing and extends lifespan via Nrk and Urh1/Pnp1/Meu1 pathways to NAD+. Cell 129: 473–484.

39. ChoiJK, HwangS, KimYJ (2008) Stochastic and regulatory role of chromatin silencing in genomic response to environmental changes. PLoS One 3: e3002.

40. WeinbergerL, VoichekY, TiroshI, HornungG, AmitI, et al. (2012) Expression noise and acetylation profiles distinguish HDAC functions. Mol Cell 47: 193–202.

41. TiroshI, WeinbergerA, CarmiM, BarkaiN (2006) A genetic signature of interspecies variations in gene expression. Nat Genet 38: 830–834.

42. ChenM, LiconK, OtsukaR, PillusL, IdekerT (2013) Decoupling epigenetic and genetic effects through systematic analysis of gene position. Cell Rep 3: 128–137.

43. Perez-MartinJ, UriaJA, JohnsonAD (1999) Phenotypic switching in Candida albicans is controlled by a SIR2 gene. EMBO J 18: 2580–2592.

44. StevensonJS, LiuH (2011) Regulation of white and opaque cell-type formation in Candida albicans by Rtt109 and Hst3. Mol Microbiol 81: 1078–1091.

45. HniszD, SchwarzmullerT, KuchlerK (2009) Transcriptional loops meet chromatin: a dual-layer network controls white-opaque switching in Candida albicans. Mol Microbiol 74: 1–15.

46. HniszD, BardetAF, NobileCJ, PetryshynA, GlaserW, et al. (2012) A histone deacetylase adjusts transcription kinetics at coding sequences during Candida albicans morphogenesis. PLoS Genet 8: e1003118.

47. CormackBP, GhoriN, FalkowS (1999) An adhesin of the yeast pathogen Candida glabrata mediating adherence to human epithelial cells. Science 285: 578–582.

48. HalliwellSC, SmithMC, MustonP, HollandSL, AverySV (2012) Heterogeneous expression of the virulence-related adhesin Epa1 between individual cells and strains of the pathogen Candida glabrata. Eukaryot Cell 11: 141–150.

49. RosinD, HornungG, TiroshI, GispanA, BarkaiN (2012) Promoter nucleosome organization shapes the evolution of gene expression. PLoS Genet 8: e1002579.

50. BrunoVM, WangZ, MarjaniSL, EuskirchenGM, MartinJ, et al. (2010) Comprehensive annotation of the transcriptome of the human fungal pathogen Candida albicans using RNA-seq. Genome Res 20: 1451–1458.

51. AndersonMZ, BallerJA, DulmageK, WigenL, BermanJ (2012) The three clades of the telomere-associated TLO gene family of Candida albicans have different splicing, localization, and expression features. Eukaryot Cell 11: 1268–1275.

52. PiccirilloS, WhiteMG, MurphyJC, LawDJ, HonigbergSM (2010) The Rim101p/PacC pathway and alkaline pH regulate pattern formation in yeast colonies. Genetics 184: 707–716.

53. PurnapatreK, HonigbergSM (2002) Meiotic differentiation during colony maturation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 42: 1–8.

54. FieldY, KaplanN, Fondufe-MittendorfY, MooreIK, SharonE, et al. (2008) Distinct modes of regulation by chromatin encoded through nucleosome positioning signals. PLoS Comput Biol 4: e1000216.

55. ZauggJB, LuscombeNM (2012) A genomic model of condition-specific nucleosome behavior explains transcriptional activity in yeast. Genome Res 22: 84–94.

56. TanRZ, van OudenaardenA (2010) Transcript counting in single cells reveals dynamics of rDNA transcription. Mol Syst Biol 6: 358.

57. KaeberleinM, McVeyM, GuarenteL (1999) The SIR2/3/4 complex and SIR2 alone promote longevity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by two different mechanisms. Genes Dev 13: 2570–2580.

58. HalmeA, BumgarnerS, StylesC, FinkGR (2004) Genetic and epigenetic regulation of the FLO gene family generates cell-surface variation in yeast. Cell 116: 405–415.

59. LiX, ZhaoX, FangY, JiangX, DuongT, et al. (1998) Generation of destabilized green fluorescent protein as a transcription reporter. J Biol Chem 273: 34970–34975.

60. KaiserB, MunderT, SaluzHP, KunkelW, EckR (1999) Identification of a gene encoding the pyruvate decarboxylase gene regulator CaPdc2p from Candida albicans. Yeast 15: 585–591.

61. InigoS, GiraldezAN, ChoryJ, CerdanPD (2012) Proteasome-mediated turnover of Arabidopsis MED25 is coupled to the activation of FLOWERING LOCUS T transcription. Plant Physiol 160: 1662–1673.

62. MolinariE, GilmanM, NatesanS (1999) Proteasome-mediated degradation of transcriptional activators correlates with activation domain potency in vivo. EMBO J 18: 6439–6447.

63. VerstrepenKJ, FinkGR (2009) Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms underlying cell-surface variability in protozoa and fungi. Annu Rev Genet 43: 1–24.

64. LehnerB (2010) Conflict between noise and plasticity in yeast. PLoS Genet 6: e1001185.

65. CareyLB, van DijkD, SlootPM, KaandorpJA, SegalE (2013) Promoter sequence determines the relationship between expression level and noise. PLoS Biol 11: e1001528.

66. Freeman-CookLL, ShermanJM, BrachmannCB, AllshireRC, BoekeJD, et al. (1999) The Schizosaccharomyces pombe hst4(+) gene is a SIR2 homologue with silencing and centromeric functions. Mol Biol Cell 10: 3171–3186.

67. Freitas-JuniorLH, Hernandez-RivasR, RalphSA, Montiel-CondadoD, Ruvalcaba-SalazarOK, et al. (2005) Telomeric heterochromatin propagation and histone acetylation control mutually exclusive expression of antigenic variation genes in malaria parasites. Cell 121: 25–36.

68. PirrottaV, GrossDS (2005) Epigenetic silencing mechanisms in budding yeast and fruit fly: different paths, same destinations. Mol Cell 18: 395–398.

69. KitadaT, KuryanBG, TranNN, SongC, XueY, et al. (2012) Mechanism for epigenetic variegation of gene expression at yeast telomeric heterochromatin. Genes Dev 26: 2443–2455.

70. RossmannMP, LuoW, TsaponinaO, ChabesA, StillmanB (2011) A common telomeric gene silencing assay is affected by nucleotide metabolism. Mol Cell 42: 127–136.

71. ZhuX, ZhangY, BjornsdottirG, LiuZ, QuanA, et al. (2011) Histone modifications influence mediator interactions with chromatin. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 8342–8354.

72. PengJ, ZhouJQ (2012) The tail-module of yeast Mediator complex is required for telomere heterochromatin maintenance. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 581–593.

73. BurrackLS, ApplenSE, BermanJ (2011) The requirement for the Dam1 complex is dependent upon the number of kinetochore proteins and microtubules. Curr Biol 21: 889–896.

74. Gerami-NejadM, BermanJ, GaleCA (2001) Cassettes for PCR-mediated construction of green, yellow, and cyan fluorescent protein fusions in Candida albicans. Yeast 18: 859–864.

75. Gerami-NejadM, ForcheA, McClellanM, BermanJ (2012) Analysis of protein function in clinical C. albicans isolates. Yeast 29: 303–309.

76. GreenbaumD, ColangeloC, WilliamsK, GersteinM (2003) Comparing protein abundance and mRNA expression levels on a genomic scale. Genome Biol 4: 117.

77. R Development Core Team (2010) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

78. SudberyPE (2001) The germ tubes of Candida albicans hyphae and pseudohyphae show different patterns of septin ring localization. Mol Microbiol 41: 19–31.

Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicína

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Genetics


2014 Číslo 7
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
nový kurz
Autori: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#