Tethering Sister Centromeres to Each Other Suggests the Spindle Checkpoint Detects Stretch within the Kinetochore
The spindle checkpoint monitors tension on chromosomes to distinguish between chromosomes that are correctly and incorrectly attached to the spindle. Tension is generated across a correctly attached chromosome as microtubules from opposite poles attach to and pull kinetochores apart, but are resisted by the cohesin that holds sister chromatids together. This tension generates separation between kinetochores as pericentric chromatin stretches and it also elongates the kinetochores. To monitor tension, the checkpoint could measure the separation between kinetochores or the stretch within them. We inhibited the ability of pericentric chromatin to stretch by tethering sister centromeres to each other, and we asked whether the resulting reduction in inter-kinetochore separation artificially activated the spindle checkpoint. Inhibiting inter-kinetochore separation does not delay anaphase, and the timing of mitosis was the same in cells with or without the spindle checkpoint, showing that the checkpoint is not activated. Inhibiting chromatin stretch does not alter the function of kinetochores as chromosomes are still segregated correctly, nor does it hinder the checkpoint. Cells whose sister kinetochores are held together can still activate the checkpoint in response to microtubule depolymerization. Our results indicate the spindle checkpoint does not monitor inter-kinetochore separation and likely monitors tension within kinetochores.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Tethering Sister Centromeres to Each Other Suggests the Spindle Checkpoint Detects Stretch within the Kinetochore. PLoS Genet 10(8): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004492
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004492
Souhrn
The spindle checkpoint monitors tension on chromosomes to distinguish between chromosomes that are correctly and incorrectly attached to the spindle. Tension is generated across a correctly attached chromosome as microtubules from opposite poles attach to and pull kinetochores apart, but are resisted by the cohesin that holds sister chromatids together. This tension generates separation between kinetochores as pericentric chromatin stretches and it also elongates the kinetochores. To monitor tension, the checkpoint could measure the separation between kinetochores or the stretch within them. We inhibited the ability of pericentric chromatin to stretch by tethering sister centromeres to each other, and we asked whether the resulting reduction in inter-kinetochore separation artificially activated the spindle checkpoint. Inhibiting inter-kinetochore separation does not delay anaphase, and the timing of mitosis was the same in cells with or without the spindle checkpoint, showing that the checkpoint is not activated. Inhibiting chromatin stretch does not alter the function of kinetochores as chromosomes are still segregated correctly, nor does it hinder the checkpoint. Cells whose sister kinetochores are held together can still activate the checkpoint in response to microtubule depolymerization. Our results indicate the spindle checkpoint does not monitor inter-kinetochore separation and likely monitors tension within kinetochores.
Zdroje
1. SiegelJJ, AmonA (2012) New insights into the troubles of aneuploidy. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 28: 189–214.
2. KopsGJ, WeaverBA, ClevelandDW (2005) On the road to cancer: Aneuploidy and the mitotic checkpoint. Nature Reviews Cancer 5: 773–785.
3. DriscollDA, GrossS (2009) Prenatal screening for aneuploidy. N Engl J Med 360: 2556–2562.
4. WestermannS, DrubinDG, BarnesG (2007) Structures and functions of yeast kinetochore complexes. Annu Rev Biochem 76: 563–591.
5. LiR, MurrayAW (1991) Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 66: 519–531.
6. HoytMA, TotisL, RobertsBT (1991) S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell 66: 507–517.
7. RiederCL, ColeRW, KhodjakovA, SluderG (1995) The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores. J Cell Biol 130: 941–948.
8. LiX, NicklasRB (1995) Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint. Nature 373: 630–632.
9. SternBM, MurrayAW (2001) Lack of tension at kinetochores activates the spindle checkpoint in budding yeast. Current Biology 11: 1462–1467.
10. GoshimaG, YanagidaM (2000) Establishing biorientation occurs with precocious separation of the sister kinetochores, but not the arms, in the early spindle of budding yeast. Cell 100: 619–633.
11. HeX, AsthanaS, SorgerPK (2000) Transient sister chromatid separation and elastic deformation of chromosomes during mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 101: 763–775.
12. MarescaTJ, SalmonED (2009) Intrakinetochore stretch is associated with changes in kinetochore phosphorylation and spindle assembly checkpoint activity. J Cell Biol 184: 373–381.
13. UchidaKS, TakagakiK, KumadaK, HirayamaY, NodaT, et al. (2009) Kinetochore stretching inactivates the spindle assembly checkpoint. J Cell Biol 184: 383–390.
14. WanX, O'QuinnRP, PierceHL, JoglekarAP, GallWE, et al. (2009) Protein architecture of the human kinetochore microtubule attachment site. Cell 137: 672–684.
15. IndjeianVB, SternBM, MurrayAW (2005) The centromeric protein Sgo1 is required to sense lack of tension on mitotic chromosomes. Science 307: 130.
16. BigginsS, MurrayAW (2001) The budding yeast protein kinase Ipl1/aurora allows the absence of tension to activate the spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev 15: 3118–3129.
17. PinskyBA, TatsutaniSY, CollinsKA, BigginsS (2003) An Mtw1 complex promotes kinetochore biorientation that is monitored by the Ipl1/aurora protein kinase. Developmental cell 5: 735–745.
18. PinskyBA, KungC, ShokatKM, BigginsS (2005) The Ipl1-aurora protein kinase activates the spindle checkpoint by creating unattached kinetochores. Nat Cell Biol 8: 78–83.
19. TanakaTU, RachidiN, JankeC, PereiraG, GalovaM, et al. (2002) Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections. Cell 108: 317–329.
20. TanakaTU (2008) Bi-orienting chromosomes: Acrobatics on the mitotic spindle. Chromosoma 117: 521–533.
21. BaumannC, KörnerR, HofmannK, NiggEA (2007) PICH, a centromere-associated SNF2 family ATPase, is regulated by Plk1 and required for the spindle checkpoint. Cell 128: 101–114.
22. WangLH, SchwarzbraunT, SpeicherMR, NiggEA (2008) Persistence of DNA threads in human anaphase cells suggests late completion of sister chromatid decatenation. Chromosoma 117: 123–135.
23. MarescaTJ, SalmonE (2010) Welcome to a new kind of tension: Translating kinetochore mechanics into a wait-anaphase signal. J Cell Sci 123: 825–835.
24. StraightAF, BelmontAS, RobinettCC, MurrayAW (1996) GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein-protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion. Current Biology 6: 1599–1608.
25. LacefieldS, MurrayAW (2007) The spindle checkpoint rescues the meiotic segregation of chromosomes whose crossovers are far from the centromere. Nat Genet 39: 1273–1277.
26. SchmitzA, CoulondreC, MillerJH (1978) Genetic studies of the <i> lac repressor: V. repressors which bind operator more tightly generated by suppression and reversion of nonsense mutations. J Mol Biol 123: 431–454.
27. SuranaU, AmonA, DowzerC, McGrewJ, ByersB, et al. (1993) Destruction of the CDC28/CLB mitotic kinase is not required for the metaphase to anaphase transition in budding yeast. EMBO J 12: 1969–1978.
28. LacefieldS, LauDT, MurrayAW (2009) Recruiting a microtubule-binding complex to DNA directs chromosome segregation in budding yeast. Nat Cell Biol 11: 1116–1120.
29. HillA, BloomK (1987) Genetic manipulation of centromere function. Mol Cell Biol 7: 2397–2405.
30. TanakaT, FuchsJ, LoidlJ, NasmythK (2000) Cohesin ensures bipolar attachment of microtubules to sister centromeres and resists their precocious separation. Nat Cell Biol 2: 492–499.
31. IndjeianVB, MurrayAW (2007) Budding yeast mitotic chromosomes have an intrinsic bias to biorient on the spindle. Current Biology 17: 1837–1846.
32. ChenRH, WatersJC, SalmonED, MurrayAW (1996) Association of spindle assembly checkpoint component XMAD2 with unattached kinetochores. Science 274: 242–246.
33. WatersJC, ChenRH, MurrayAW, SalmonED (1998) Localization of Mad2 to kinetochores depends on microtubule attachment, not tension. J Cell Biol 141: 1181–1191.
34. TanakaK (2012) Dynamic regulation of kinetochore–microtubule interaction during mitosis. J Biochem 152: 415–424.
35. SuzukiA, HoriT, NishinoT, UsukuraJ, MiyagiA, et al. (2011) Spindle microtubules generate tension-dependent changes in the distribution of inner kinetochore proteins. J Cell Biol 193: 125–140.
36. WangH, LongS, CiferriC, WestermannS, DrubinD, et al. (2008) Architecture and flexibility of the yeast Ndc80 kinetochore complex. J Mol Biol 383: 894–903.
37. SandallS, SeverinF, McLeodIX, YatesJRIII, OegemaK, et al. (2006) A Bir1-Sli15 complex connects centromeres to microtubules and is required to sense kinetochore tension. Cell 127: 1179–1191.
38. CarmenaM, WheelockM, FunabikiH, EarnshawWC (2012) The chromosomal passenger complex (CPC): From easy rider to the godfather of mitosis. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 13: 789–803.
39. CampbellCS, DesaiA (2013) Tension sensing by aurora B kinase is independent of survivin-based centromere localization. Nature 497: 118–121.
40. LiuD, VaderG, VromansMJ, LampsonMA, LensSM (2009) Sensing chromosome bi-orientation by spatial separation of aurora B kinase from kinetochore substrates. Science 323: 1350–1353.
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2014 Číslo 8
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Meta-Analysis of Genome-Wide Association Studies in African Americans Provides Insights into the Genetic Architecture of Type 2 Diabetes
- KDM6 Demethylase Independent Loss of Histone H3 Lysine 27 Trimethylation during Early Embryonic Development
- The RNA Helicases AtMTR4 and HEN2 Target Specific Subsets of Nuclear Transcripts for Degradation by the Nuclear Exosome in
- EF-P Dependent Pauses Integrate Proximal and Distal Signals during Translation