Wnt-Mediated Repression via Bipartite DNA Recognition by TCF in the Hematopoietic System
During development and in adult tissues, cells communicate with each other through biochemical cascades known as signaling pathways. In this report, we study the Wnt signaling pathway, using the fruit fly Drosophila as a model system. This pathway is known to activate gene expression in cells receiving the Wnt signal, working through a transcription factor known as TCF. But sometimes Wnt signaling also instructs TCF to repress target gene expression. What determines whether TCF will positively or negatively regulate Wnt targets? We demonstrate that activated and repressed targets have distinct DNA sequences that dock TCF on their regulatory DNA. The type of site determines the output, i.e., activation or repression. We find that TCF adopts different conformations when bound to either DNA sequence, which most likely influences its regulatory activity. In addition, we demonstrate that Wnt-dependent repression occurs robustly in the fly larval lymph gland, the tissue responsible for generating macrophage-like cells known as hemocytes.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Wnt-Mediated Repression via Bipartite DNA Recognition by TCF in the Hematopoietic System. PLoS Genet 10(8): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004509
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004509
Souhrn
During development and in adult tissues, cells communicate with each other through biochemical cascades known as signaling pathways. In this report, we study the Wnt signaling pathway, using the fruit fly Drosophila as a model system. This pathway is known to activate gene expression in cells receiving the Wnt signal, working through a transcription factor known as TCF. But sometimes Wnt signaling also instructs TCF to repress target gene expression. What determines whether TCF will positively or negatively regulate Wnt targets? We demonstrate that activated and repressed targets have distinct DNA sequences that dock TCF on their regulatory DNA. The type of site determines the output, i.e., activation or repression. We find that TCF adopts different conformations when bound to either DNA sequence, which most likely influences its regulatory activity. In addition, we demonstrate that Wnt-dependent repression occurs robustly in the fly larval lymph gland, the tissue responsible for generating macrophage-like cells known as hemocytes.
Zdroje
1. BaroloS, PosakonyJW (2002) Three habits of highly effective signaling pathways: principles of transcriptional control by developmental cell signaling. Genes Dev 16: 1167–1181.
2. AffolterM, PyrowolakisG, WeissA, BaslerK (2008) Signal-induced repression: the exception or the rule in developmental signaling? Dev Cell 15: 11–22.
3. NovacN, BausD, DostertA, HeinzelT (2006) Competition between glucocorticoid receptor and NFkappaB for control of the human FasL promoter. FASEB J 20: 1074–1081.
4. LueckeHF, YamamotoKR (2005) The glucocorticoid receptor blocks P-TEFb recruitment by NFkappaB to effect promoter-specific transcriptional repression. Genes Dev 19: 1116–1127.
5. OgawaS, OishiH, MezakiY, Kouzu-FujitaM, MatsuyamaR, et al. (2005) Repressive domain of unliganded human estrogen receptor alpha associates with Hsc70. Genes Cells 10: 1095–1102.
6. KaoHY, OrdentlichP, Koyano-NakagawaN, TangZ, DownesM, et al. (1998) A histone deacetylase corepressor complex regulates the Notch signal transduction pathway. Genes Dev 12: 2269–2277.
7. HsiehJJ, HaywardSD (1995) Masking of the CBF1/RBPJ kappa transcriptional repression domain by Epstein-Barr virus EBNA2. Science 268: 560–563.
8. PursgloveSE, MackayJP (2005) CSL: a notch above the rest. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 37: 2472–2477.
9. ChenCR, KangY, SiegelPM, MassagueJ (2002) E2F4/5 and p107 as Smad cofactors linking the TGFbeta receptor to c-myc repression. Cell 110: 19–32.
10. CanonJ, BanerjeeU (2003) In vivo analysis of a developmental circuit for direct transcriptional activation and repression in the same cell by a Runx protein. Genes Dev 17: 838–843.
11. HerkertB, EilersM (2010) Transcriptional repression: the dark side of myc. Genes Cancer 1: 580–586.
12. JiangJ, CaiH, ZhouQ, LevineM (1993) Conversion of a dorsal-dependent silencer into an enhancer: evidence for dorsal corepressors. EMBO J 12: 3201–3209.
13. KirovN, ZhelninL, ShahJ, RushlowC (1993) Conversion of a silencer into an enhancer: evidence for a co-repressor in dorsal-mediated repression in Drosophila. EMBO J 12: 3193–3199.
14. SaatciogluF, DengT, KarinM (1993) A novel cis element mediating ligand-independent activation by c-ErbA: implications for hormonal regulation. Cell 75: 1095–1105.
15. SurjitM, GantiKP, MukherjiA, YeT, HuaG, et al. (2011) Widespread negative response elements mediate direct repression by agonist-liganded glucocorticoid receptor. Cell 145: 224–241.
16. JohnsonRA, InceTA, ScottoKW (2001) Transcriptional repression by p53 through direct binding to a novel DNA element. J Biol Chem 276: 27716–27720.
17. ScullyKM, JacobsonEM, JepsenK, LunyakV, ViadiuH, et al. (2000) Allosteric effects of Pit-1 DNA sites on long-term repression in cell type specification. Science 290: 1127–1131.
18. PyrowolakisG, HartmannB, MullerB, BaslerK, AffolterM (2004) A simple molecular complex mediates widespread BMP-induced repression during Drosophila development. Dev Cell 7: 229–240.
19. WeissA, CharbonnierE, EllertsdottirE, TsirigosA, WolfC, et al. (2010) A conserved activation element in BMP signaling during Drosophila development. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17: 69–76.
20. MeijsingSH, PufallMA, SoAY, BatesDL, ChenL, et al. (2009) DNA binding site sequence directs glucocorticoid receptor structure and activity. Science 324: 407–410.
21. LoganCY, NusseR (2004) The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 20: 781–810.
22. MacDonaldBT, TamaiK, HeX (2009) Wnt/beta-catenin signaling: components, mechanisms, and diseases. Dev Cell 17: 9–26.
23. ArchboldHC, YangYX, ChenL, CadiganKM (2012) How do they do Wnt they do?: regulation of transcription by the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 204: 74–109.
24. ValentaT, HausmannG, BaslerK (2012) The many faces and functions of beta-catenin. EMBO J 31: 2714–2736.
25. CadiganKM, PeiferM (2009) Wnt signaling from development to disease: insights from model systems. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 1: a002881.
26. CadiganKM, WatermanML (2012) TCF/LEFs and Wnt signaling in the nucleus. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4: a007906.
27. BaroloS (2006) Transgenic Wnt/TCF pathway reporters: all you need is Lef? Oncogene 25: 7505–7511.
28. CadiganKM (2012) TCFs and Wnt/beta-catenin signaling: more than one way to throw the switch. Curr Top Dev Biol 98: 1–34.
29. van de WeteringM, CavalloR, DooijesD, van BeestM, van EsJ, et al. (1997) Armadillo coactivates transcription driven by the product of the Drosophila segment polarity gene dTCF. Cell 88: 789–799.
30. van BeestM, DooijesD, van De WeteringM, KjaerulffS, BonvinA, et al. (2000) Sequence-specific high mobility group box factors recognize 10–12-base pair minor groove motifs. J Biol Chem 275: 27266–27273.
31. HallikasO, PalinK, SinjushinaN, RautiainenR, PartanenJ, et al. (2006) Genome-wide prediction of mammalian enhancers based on analysis of transcription-factor binding affinity. Cell 124: 47–59.
32. AtchaFA, SyedA, WuB, HoverterNP, YokoyamaNN, et al. (2007) A unique DNA binding domain converts T-cell factors into strong Wnt effectors. Mol Cell Biol 27: 8352–8363.
33. ChangMV, ChangJL, GangopadhyayA, ShearerA, CadiganKM (2008) Activation of wingless targets requires bipartite recognition of DNA by TCF. Curr Biol 18: 1877–1881.
34. HoverterNP, TingJH, SundareshS, BaldiP, WatermanML (2012) A WNT/p21 circuit directed by the C-clamp, a sequence-specific DNA binding domain in TCFs. Mol Cell Biol 32: 3648–3662.
35. PiepenburgO, VorbruggenG, JackleH (2000) Drosophila segment borders result from unilateral repression of hedgehog activity by wingless signaling. Mol Cell 6: 203–209.
36. JamoraC, DasGuptaR, KocieniewskiP, FuchsE (2003) Links between signal transduction, transcription and adhesion in epithelial bud development. Nature 422: 317–322.
37. DelmasV, BeermannF, MartinozziS, CarreiraS, AckermannJ, et al. (2007) Beta-catenin induces immortalization of melanocytes by suppressing p16INK4a expression and cooperates with N-Ras in melanoma development. Genes Dev 21: 2923–2935.
38. TheisenH, SyedA, NguyenBT, LukacsovichT, PurcellJ, et al. (2007) Wingless directly represses DPP morphogen expression via an armadillo/TCF/Brinker complex. PLoS One 2: e142.
39. BlauwkampTA, ChangMV, CadiganKM (2008) Novel TCF-binding sites specify transcriptional repression by Wnt signalling. EMBO J 27: 1436–1446.
40. SinenkoSA, MandalL, Martinez-AgostoJA, BanerjeeU (2009) Dual role of wingless signaling in stem-like hematopoietic precursor maintenance in Drosophila. Dev Cell 16: 756–763.
41. AndresAJ, CherbasP (1994) Tissue-specific regulation by ecdysone: distinct patterns of Eip28/29 expression are controlled by different ecdysone response elements. Dev Genet 15: 320–331.
42. FogertyFJ, FesslerLI, BunchTA, YaronY, ParkerCG, et al. (1994) Tiggrin, a novel Drosophila extracellular matrix protein that functions as a ligand for Drosophila alpha PS2 beta PS integrins. Development 120: 1747–1758.
43. BunchTA, GranerMW, FesslerLI, FesslerJH, SchneiderKD, et al. (1998) The PS2 integrin ligand tiggrin is required for proper muscle function in Drosophila. Development 125: 1679–1689.
44. RahmanM, HamH, LiuX, SugiuraY, OrthK, et al. (2012) Visual neurotransmission in Drosophila requires expression of Fic in glial capitate projections. Nat Neurosci 15: 871–875.
45. FangM, LiJ, BlauwkampT, BhambhaniC, CampbellN, et al. (2006) C-terminal-binding protein directly activates and represses Wnt transcriptional targets in Drosophila. EMBO J 25: 2735–2745.
46. SosinskyA, BoninCP, MannRS, HonigB (2003) Target Explorer: An automated tool for the identification of new target genes for a specified set of transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3589–3592.
47. ChangJL, ChangMV, BaroloS, CadiganKM (2008) Regulation of the feedback antagonist naked cuticle by Wingless signaling. Dev Biol 321: 446–454.
48. LoveJJ, LiX, CaseDA, GieseK, GrosschedlR, et al. (1995) Structural basis for DNA bending by the architectural transcription factor LEF-1. Nature 376: 791–795.
49. ThompsonJF, LandyA (1988) Empirical estimation of protein-induced DNA bending angles: applications to lambda site-specific recombination complexes. Nucleic Acids Res 16: 9687–9705.
50. BaroloS, CarverLA, PosakonyJW (2000) GFP and beta-galactosidase transformation vectors for promoter/enhancer analysis in Drosophila. Biotechniques 29: 726, 728, 730, 732.
51. HortschM, OlsonA, FishmanS, SoneralSN, MarikarY, et al. (1998) The expression of MDP-1, a component of Drosophila embryonic basement membranes, is modulated by apoptotic cell death. Int J Dev Biol 42: 33–42.
52. BrandAH, PerrimonN (1993) Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118: 401–415.
53. JungSH, EvansCJ, UemuraC, BanerjeeU (2005) The Drosophila lymph gland as a developmental model of hematopoiesis. Development 132: 2521–2533.
54. HolzA, BossingerB, StrasserT, JanningW, KlapperR (2003) The two origins of hemocytes in Drosophila. Development 130: 4955–4962.
55. ZettervallCJ, AnderlI, WilliamsMJ, PalmerR, KuruczE, et al. (2004) A directed screen for genes involved in Drosophila blood cell activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 14192–14197.
56. ZhangJ, CarthewRW (1998) Interactions between Wingless and DFz2 during Drosophila wing development. Development 125: 3075–3085.
57. CadiganKM, FishMP, RulifsonEJ, NusseR (1998) Wingless repression of Drosophila frizzled 2 expression shapes the Wingless morphogen gradient in the wing. Cell 93: 767–777.
58. GhiglioneC, DevergneO, GeorgenthumE, CarballesF, MedioniC, et al. (2002) The Drosophila cytokine receptor Domeless controls border cell migration and epithelial polarization during oogenesis. Development 129: 5437–5447.
59. BadisG, BergerMF, PhilippakisAA, TalukderS, GehrkeAR, et al. (2009) Diversity and complexity in DNA recognition by transcription factors. Science 324: 1720–1723.
60. SallerE, KelleyA, BienzM (2002) The transcriptional repressor Brinker antagonizes Wingless signaling. Genes Dev 16: 1828–1838.
61. LeungTH, HoffmannA, BaltimoreD (2004) One nucleotide in a kappaB site can determine cofactor specificity for NF-kappaB dimers. Cell 118: 453–464.
62. PennetierD, OyallonJ, Morin-PoulardI, DejeanS, VincentA, et al. (2012) Size control of the Drosophila hematopoietic niche by bone morphogenetic protein signaling reveals parallels with mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 3389–3394.
63. RamosAI, BaroloS (2013) Low-affinity transcription factor binding sites shape morphogen responses and enhancer evolution. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 368: 20130018.
64. SwansonCI, EvansNC, BaroloS (2010) Structural rules and complex regulatory circuitry constrain expression of a Notch- and EGFR-regulated eye enhancer. Dev Cell 18: 359–370.
65. VincentJP, GirdhamC (1997) Promoters to express cloned genes uniformly in Drosophila. Methods Mol Biol 62: 385–392.
66. SchaggerH (2006) Tricine-SDS-PAGE. Nat Protoc 1: 16–22.
67. NesterenkoMV, TilleyM, UptonSJ (1994) A simple modification of Blum's silver stain method allows for 30 minute detection of proteins in polyacrylamide gels. J Biochem Biophys Methods 28: 239–242.
68. MarksteinM, PitsouliC, VillaltaC, CelnikerSE, PerrimonN (2008) Exploiting position effects and the gypsy retrovirus insulator to engineer precisely expressed transgenes. Nat Genet 40: 476–483.
69. BoyAL, ZhaiZ, Habring-MullerA, Kussler-SchneiderY, KasparP, et al. (2010) Vectors for efficient and high-throughput construction of fluorescent drosophila reporters using the PhiC31 site-specific integration system. Genesis 48: 452–456.
70. HuelsmannS, HepperC, MarcheseD, KnollC, ReuterR (2006) The PDZ-GEF dizzy regulates cell shape of migrating macrophages via Rap1 and integrins in the Drosophila embryo. Development 133: 2915–2924.
71. BourbonHM, Gonzy-TreboulG, PeronnetF, AlinMF, ArdourelC, et al. (2002) A P-insertion screen identifying novel X-linked essential genes in Drosophila. Mech Dev 110: 71–83.
72. Crew JRBP (1997) PollockJA (1997) Developing compound eye in lozenge mutants of Drosophila: lozenge expression in the R7 equivalence group. Dev Genes Evol 206: 481–493.
73. AshaH, NagyI, KovacsG, StetsonD, AndoI, et al. (2003) Analysis of Ras-induced overproliferation in Drosophila hemocytes. Genetics 163: 203–215.
74. GotoA, KadowakiT, KitagawaY (2003) Drosophila hemolectin gene is expressed in embryonic and larval hemocytes and its knock down causes bleeding defects. Dev Biol 264: 582–591.
75. SatoM, UmetsuD, MurakamiS, YasugiT, TabataT (2006) DWnt4 regulates the dorsoventral specificity of retinal projections in the Drosophila melanogaster visual system. Nat Neurosci 9: 67–75.
76. EvansCJ, LiuT, BanerjeeU (2014) Drosophila hematopoiesis: Markers and methods for molecular genetic analysis. Methods 68: 242–251.
77. BellenHJ, O'KaneCJ, WilsonC, GrossniklausU, PearsonRK, et al. (1989) P-element-mediated enhancer detection: a versatile method to study development in Drosophila. Genes Dev 3: 1288–1300.
78. DengH, BellJB, SimmondsAJ (2010) Vestigial is required during late-stage muscle differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster embryos. Mol Biol Cell 21: 3304–3316.
79. KuruczE, MarkusR, ZsambokiJ, Folkl-MedzihradszkyK, DarulaZ, et al. (2007) Nimrod, a putative phagocytosis receptor with EGF repeats in Drosophila plasmatocytes. Curr Biol 17: 649–654.
80. BhambhaniC, RavindranathAJ, MentinkRA, ChangMV, BetistMC, et al. (2014) Distinct DNA Binding Sites Contribute to the TCF Transcriptional Switch in C. elegans and Drosophila. PLoS Genet 10: e1004133.
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2014 Číslo 8
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Meta-Analysis of Genome-Wide Association Studies in African Americans Provides Insights into the Genetic Architecture of Type 2 Diabetes
- KDM6 Demethylase Independent Loss of Histone H3 Lysine 27 Trimethylation during Early Embryonic Development
- The RNA Helicases AtMTR4 and HEN2 Target Specific Subsets of Nuclear Transcripts for Degradation by the Nuclear Exosome in
- EF-P Dependent Pauses Integrate Proximal and Distal Signals during Translation