Is Required for High Efficiency Viral Replication
Viruses often can highly efficiently utilize the host system to make huge amounts of viral proteins for their replication; however, which host factors are needed by the viruses are largely unknown. We analyzed about one hundred Drosophila mutants and found that the pelo mutation in Drosophila inhibited Drosophila C virus (DCV) replication. We found pelo is specifically required for high efficiency synthesis of proteins of a number of viruses, suggesting that inhibition of pelo may mediate a general antiviral activity. We proposed that the function of pelo in quality control of protein synthesis is required for high efficiency viral protein synthesis. Our study presented here identifies a new host factor, pelo, that is specifically required for effective viral replication and it may be a new potential therapeutic target for broad-spectrum antiviral therapy.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Is Required for High Efficiency Viral Replication. PLoS Pathog 10(4): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004034
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004034
Souhrn
Viruses often can highly efficiently utilize the host system to make huge amounts of viral proteins for their replication; however, which host factors are needed by the viruses are largely unknown. We analyzed about one hundred Drosophila mutants and found that the pelo mutation in Drosophila inhibited Drosophila C virus (DCV) replication. We found pelo is specifically required for high efficiency synthesis of proteins of a number of viruses, suggesting that inhibition of pelo may mediate a general antiviral activity. We proposed that the function of pelo in quality control of protein synthesis is required for high efficiency viral protein synthesis. Our study presented here identifies a new host factor, pelo, that is specifically required for effective viral replication and it may be a new potential therapeutic target for broad-spectrum antiviral therapy.
Zdroje
1. OldstoneMB (1996) Principles of viral pathogenesis. Cell 87 : 799–801.
2. BeutlerB, EidenschenkC, CrozatK, ImlerJL, TakeuchiO, et al. (2007) Genetic analysis of resistance to viral infection. Nature reviews Immunology 7 : 753–766.
3. PichlmairA, Reis e SousaC (2007) Innate recognition of viruses. Immunity 27 : 370–383.
4. YanN, ChenZJ (2012) Intrinsic antiviral immunity. Nature immunology 13 : 214–222.
5. LemaitreB, HoffmannJ (2007) The host defense of Drosophila melanogaster. Annual review of immunology 25 : 697–743.
6. FerrandonD, ImlerJL, HetruC, HoffmannJA (2007) The Drosophila systemic immune response: sensing and signalling during bacterial and fungal infections. Nature reviews Immunology 7 : 862–874.
7. KempC, ImlerJL (2009) Antiviral immunity in drosophila. Current opinion in immunology 21 : 3–9.
8. SabinLR, HannaSL, CherryS (2010) Innate antiviral immunity in Drosophila. Current opinion in immunology 22 : 4–9.
9. WangXH, AliyariR, LiWX, LiHW, KimK, et al. (2006) RNA interference directs innate immunity against viruses in adult Drosophila. Science 312 : 452–454.
10. SalehMC, TassettoM, van RijRP, GoicB, GaussonV, et al. (2009) Antiviral immunity in Drosophila requires systemic RNA interference spread. Nature 458 : 346–350.
11. DingSW, VoinnetO (2007) Antiviral immunity directed by small RNAs. Cell 130 : 413–426.
12. LiH, LiWX, DingSW (2002) Induction and suppression of RNA silencing by an animal virus. Science 296 : 1319–1321.
13. van RijRP, SalehMC, BerryB, FooC, HoukA, et al. (2006) The RNA silencing endonuclease Argonaute 2 mediates specific antiviral immunity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes & development 20 : 2985–2995.
14. NayakA, BerryB, TassettoM, KunitomiM, AcevedoA, et al. (2010) Cricket paralysis virus antagonizes Argonaute 2 to modulate antiviral defense in Drosophila. Nature structural & molecular biology 17 : 547–554.
15. DostertC, JouanguyE, IrvingP, TroxlerL, Galiana-ArnouxD, et al. (2005) The Jak-STAT signaling pathway is required but not sufficient for the antiviral response of drosophila. Nature immunology 6 : 946–953.
16. DeddoucheS, MattN, BuddA, MuellerS, KempC, et al. (2008) The DExD/H-box helicase Dicer-2 mediates the induction of antiviral activity in drosophila. Nature immunology 9 : 1425–1432.
17. ZambonRA, NandakumarM, VakhariaVN, WuLP (2005) The Toll pathway is important for an antiviral response in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102 : 7257–7262.
18. CostaA, JanE, SarnowP, SchneiderD (2009) The Imd pathway is involved in antiviral immune responses in Drosophila. PloS one 4: e7436.
19. ShellyS, LukinovaN, BambinaS, BermanA, CherryS (2009) Autophagy is an essential component of Drosophila immunity against vesicular stomatitis virus. Immunity 30 : 588–598.
20. NakamotoM, MoyRH, XuJ, BambinaS, YasunagaA, et al. (2012) Virus recognition by Toll-7 activates antiviral autophagy in Drosophila. Immunity 36 : 658–667.
21. PirieNW (1946) The viruses. Annual review of biochemistry 15 : 573–592.
22. CherryS, PerrimonN (2004) Entry is a rate-limiting step for viral infection in a Drosophila melanogaster model of pathogenesis. Nature immunology 5 : 81–87.
23. CherryS, DoukasT, ArmknechtS, WhelanS, WangH, et al. (2005) Genome-wide RNAi screen reveals a specific sensitivity of IRES-containing RNA viruses to host translation inhibition. Genes & development 19 : 445–452.
24. CherryS, KunteA, WangH, CoyneC, RawsonRB, et al. (2006) COPI activity coupled with fatty acid biosynthesis is required for viral replication. PLoS pathogens 2: e102.
25. BushellM, SarnowP (2002) Hijacking the translation apparatus by RNA viruses. The Journal of cell biology 158 : 395–399.
26. DeverTE, GreenR (2012) The elongation, termination, and recycling phases of translation in eukaryotes. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology 4: a013706.
27. ShoemakerCJ, EylerDE, GreenR (2010) Dom34:Hbs1 promotes subunit dissociation and peptidyl-tRNA drop-off to initiate no-go decay. Science 330 : 369–372.
28. van den ElzenAM, HenriJ, LazarN, GasME, DurandD, et al. (2010) Dissection of Dom34-Hbs1 reveals independent functions in two RNA quality control pathways. Nature structural & molecular biology 17 : 1446–1452.
29. DomaMK, ParkerR (2006) Endonucleolytic cleavage of eukaryotic mRNAs with stalls in translation elongation. Nature 440 : 561–564.
30. KurohaK, AkamatsuM, DimitrovaL, ItoT, KatoY, et al. (2010) Receptor for activated C kinase 1 stimulates nascent polypeptide-dependent translation arrest. EMBO reports 11 : 956–961.
31. TsuboiT, KurohaK, KudoK, MakinoS, InoueE, et al. (2012) Dom34:hbs1 plays a general role in quality-control systems by dissociation of a stalled ribosome at the 3′ end of aberrant mRNA. Molecular cell 46 : 518–529.
32. PisarevaVP, SkabkinMA, HellenCU, PestovaTV, PisarevAV (2011) Dissociation by Pelota, Hbs1 and ABCE1 of mammalian vacant 80S ribosomes and stalled elongation complexes. The EMBO journal 30 : 1804–1817.
33. IzawaT, TsuboiT, KurohaK, InadaT, NishikawaS, et al. (2012) Roles of dom34:hbs1 in nonstop protein clearance from translocators for normal organelle protein influx. Cell reports 2 : 447–453.
34. LeeHH, KimYS, KimKH, HeoI, KimSK, et al. (2007) Structural and functional insights into Dom34, a key component of no-go mRNA decay. Molecular cell 27 : 938–950.
35. GrailleM, ChailletM, van TilbeurghH (2008) Structure of yeast Dom34: a protein related to translation termination factor Erf1 and involved in No-Go decay. The Journal of biological chemistry 283 : 7145–7154.
36. DavisL, EngebrechtJ (1998) Yeast dom34 mutants are defective in multiple developmental pathways and exhibit decreased levels of polyribosomes. Genetics 149 : 45–56.
37. BhattacharyaA, McIntoshKB, WillisIM, WarnerJR (2010) Why Dom34 stimulates growth of cells with defects of 40S ribosomal subunit biosynthesis. Molecular and cellular biology 30 : 5562–5571.
38. EberhartCG, WassermanSA (1995) The pelota locus encodes a protein required for meiotic cell division: an analysis of G2/M arrest in Drosophila spermatogenesis. Development 121 : 3477–3486.
39. XiR, DoanC, LiuD, XieT (2005) Pelota controls self-renewal of germline stem cells by repressing a Bam-independent differentiation pathway. Development 132 : 5365–5374.
40. AdhamIM, SallamMA, StedingG, KorabiowskaM, BrinckU, et al. (2003) Disruption of the pelota gene causes early embryonic lethality and defects in cell cycle progression. Molecular and cellular biology 23 : 1470–1476.
41. ReavyB, MooreNF (1983) Cell-free translation of Drosophila C virus RNA: identification of a virus protease activity involved in capsid protein synthesis and further studies on in vitro processing of cricket paralysis virus specified proteins. Archives of virology 76 : 101–115.
42. JoussetFX, BergoinM, RevetB (1977) Characterization of the Drosophila C virus. The Journal of general virology 34 : 269–283.
43. KingLA, MooreNF (1988) Evidence for the presence of a genome-linked protein in two insect picornaviruses, cricket paralysis and DrosophilaC viruses. FEMS Microbiology Letters 50 : 41–44.
44. Lautie-HarivelN, Thomas-OrillardM (1990) Location of Drosophila C virus target organs in Drosophila host population by an immunofluorescence technique. Biology of the cell/under the auspices of the European Cell Biology Organization 69 : 35–39.
45. TeixeiraL, FerreiraA, AshburnerM (2008) The bacterial symbiont Wolbachia induces resistance to RNA viral infections in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS biology 6: e2.
46. Fields BN, Knipe DM, Howley PM (2007) Fields virology. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
47. JohnsonKN, ChristianPD (1999) Molecular characterization of Drosophila C virus isolates. Journal of invertebrate pathology 73 : 248–254.
48. JohnsonKN, ChristianPD (1998) The novel genome organization of the insect picorna-like virus Drosophila C virus suggests this virus belongs to a previously undescribed virus family. The Journal of general virology 79(Pt 1): 191–203.
49. MasekT, ValasekL, PospisekM (2011) Polysome analysis and RNA purification from sucrose gradients. Methods in molecular biology 703 : 293–309.
50. Carr-SchmidA, PfundC, CraigEA, KinzyTG (2002) Novel G-protein complex whose requirement is linked to the translational status of the cell. Molecular and cellular biology 22 : 2564–2574.
51. JohanssonM, BouakazE, LovmarM, EhrenbergM (2008) The kinetics of ribosomal peptidyl transfer revisited. Molecular cell 30 : 589–598.
52. KempC, MuellerS, GotoA, BarbierV, ParoS, et al. (2013) Broad RNA interference-mediated antiviral immunity and virus-specific inducible responses in Drosophila. Journal of immunology 190 : 650–658.
53. StrunkBS, NovakMN, YoungCL, KarbsteinK (2012) A translation-like cycle is a quality control checkpoint for maturing 40S ribosome subunits. Cell 150 : 111–121.
54. BeckerT, ArmacheJP, JaraschA, AngerAM, VillaE, et al. (2011) Structure of the no-go mRNA decay complex Dom34-Hbs1 bound to a stalled 80S ribosome. Nature structural & molecular biology 18 : 715–720.
55. TzouP, MeisterM, LemaitreB (2002) Methods for studying infection and immunity in Drosophila. Methods in Microbiology 31 : 507–529.
56. ReedLJ, MuenchH (1938) A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Am J Epidemiol 27 : 493–497.
57. RogersSL, RogersGC (2008) Culture of Drosophila S2 cells and their use for RNAi-mediated loss-of-function studies and immunofluorescence microscopy. Nature protocols 3 : 606–611.
Štítky
Hygiena a epidemiológia Infekčné lekárstvo LaboratóriumČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Pathogens
2014 Číslo 4
- Parazitičtí červi v terapii Crohnovy choroby a dalších zánětlivých autoimunitních onemocnění
- Očkování proti virové hemoragické horečce Ebola experimentální vakcínou rVSVDG-ZEBOV-GP
- Koronavirus hýbe světem: Víte jak se chránit a jak postupovat v případě podezření?
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- The 2010 Cholera Outbreak in Haiti: How Science Solved a Controversy
- , , , Genetic Variability: Cryptic Biological Species or Clonal Near-Clades?
- Efficient Parvovirus Replication Requires CRL4-Targeted Depletion of p21 to Prevent Its Inhibitory Interaction with PCNA
- An Overview of Respiratory Syncytial Virus