Sgs1 and Exo1 Redundantly Inhibit Break-Induced Replication and Telomere Addition at Broken Chromosome Ends

English version České info

In budding yeast, an HO endonuclease-inducible double-strand break (DSB) is efficiently repaired by several homologous recombination (HR) pathways. In contrast to gene conversion (GC), where both ends of the DSB can recombine with the same template, break-induced replication (BIR) occurs when only the centromere-proximal end of the DSB can locate homologous sequences. Whereas GC results in a small patch of new DNA synthesis, BIR leads to a nonreciprocal translocation. The requirements for completing BIR are significantly different from those of GC, but both processes require 5′ to 3′ resection of DSB ends to create single-stranded DNA that leads to formation of a Rad51 filament required to initiate HR. Resection proceeds by two pathways dependent on Exo1 or the BLM homolog, Sgs1. We report that Exo1 and Sgs1 each inhibit BIR but have little effect on GC, while overexpression of either protein severely inhibits BIR. In contrast, overexpression of Rad51 markedly increases the efficiency of BIR, again with little effect on GC. In sgs1Δ exo1Δ strains, where there is little 5′ to 3′ resection, the level of BIR is not different from either single mutant; surprisingly, there is a two-fold increase in cell viability after HO induction whereby 40% of all cells survive by formation of a new telomere within a few kb of the site of DNA cleavage. De novo telomere addition is rare in wild-type, sgs1Δ, or exo1Δ cells. In sgs1Δ exo1Δ, repair by GC is severely inhibited, but cell viaiblity remains high because of new telomere formation. These data suggest that the extensive 5′ to 3′ resection that occurs before the initiation of new DNA synthesis in BIR may prevent efficient maintenance of a Rad51 filament near the DSB end. The severe constraint on 5′ to 3′ resection, which also abrogates activation of the Mec1-dependent DNA damage checkpoint, permits an unprecedented level of new telomere addition.

Vyšlo v časopise: Sgs1 and Exo1 Redundantly Inhibit Break-Induced Replication and Telomere Addition at Broken Chromosome Ends. PLoS Genet 6(5): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000973
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000973

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. San FilippoJ

SungP

KleinH

2008 Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu Rev Biochem 77 229 257

2. AgmonN

PurS

LiefshitzB

KupiecM

2009 Analysis of repair mechanism choice during homologous recombination. Nucleic Acids Res 37 5081 5092

3. KroghBO

SymingtonLS

2004 Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu Rev Genet 38 233 271

4. PâquesF

HaberJE

1999 Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63 349 404

5. LlorenteB

SmithCE

SymingtonLS

2008 Break-induced replication: what is it and what is it for? Cell Cycle 7 859 864

6. McEachernMJ

HaberJE

2006 Break-induced replication and recombinational telomere elongation in yeast. Annu Rev Biochem 75 111 135

7. ChenC

KolodnerRD

1999 Gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication and recombination defective mutants. Nat Genet 23 81 85

8. LydeardJR

JainS

YamaguchiM

HaberJE

2007 Break-induced replication and telomerase-independent telomere maintenance require Pol32. Nature 448 820 823

9. LydeardJR

Lipkin-MooreZ

SheuYJ

StillmanB

BurgersPM

in press Break-induced replication requires all essential DNA replication factors except those specific for Pre-RC assembly. Genes Dev

10. Saleh-GohariN

BryantHE

SchultzN

ParkerKM

CasselTN

2005 Spontaneous homologous recombination is induced by collapsed replication forks that are caused by endogenous DNA single-strand breaks. Mol Cell Biol 25 7158 7169

11. MurrayAW

ClausTE

SzostakJW

1988 Characterization of two telomeric DNA processing reactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 8 4642 4650

12. KramerKM

HaberJE

1993 New telomeres in yeast are initiated with a highly selected subset of TG1-3 repeats. Genes Dev 7 2345 2356

13. PennaneachV

PutnamCD

KolodnerRD

2006 Chromosome healing by de novo telomere addition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Microbiol 59 1357 1368

14. SchulzVP

ZakianVA

1994 The saccharomyces PIF1 DNA helicase inhibits telomere elongation and de novo telomere formation. Cell 76 145 155

15. DavisAP

SymingtonLS

2004 RAD51-dependent break-induced replication in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 24 2344 2351

16. JainS

SugawaraN

LydeardJ

VazeM

Tanguy Le GacN

2009 A recombination execution checkpoint regulates the choice of homologous recombination pathway during DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev 23 291 303

17. MalkovaA

NaylorML

YamaguchiM

IraG

HaberJE

2005 RAD51-dependent break-induced replication differs in kinetics and checkpoint responses from RAD51-mediated gene conversion. Mol Cell Biol 25 933 944

18. FalckJ

CoatesJ

JacksonSP

2005 Conserved modes of recruitment of ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs to sites of DNA damage. Nature 434 605 611

19. NakadaD

MatsumotoK

SugimotoK

2003 ATM-related Tel1 associates with double-strand breaks through an Xrs2-dependent mechanism. Genes Dev 17 1957 1962

20. UsuiT

OgawaH

PetriniJH

2001 A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex. Mol Cell 7 1255 1266

21. D'AmoursD

JacksonSP

2001 The yeast Xrs2 complex functions in S phase checkpoint regulation. Genes Dev 15 2238 2249

22. ZhuZ

ChungWH

ShimEY

LeeSE

IraG

2008 Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 134 981 994

23. MimitouEP

SymingtonLS

2008 Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455 770 774

24. GravelS

ChapmanJR

MagillC

JacksonSP

2008 DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection. Genes Dev 22 2767 2772

25. IraG

PellicioliA

BalijjaA

WangX

FioraniS

2004 DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 431 1011 1017

26. CejkaP

KowalczykowskiSC

2010 The full-length Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sgs1 protein is a vigorous DNA helicase that preferentially unwinds holliday junctions. J Biol Chem 285 8290 8301

27. MyungK

DattaA

ChenC

KolodnerRD

2001 SGS1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of BLM and WRN, suppresses genome instability and homeologous recombination. Nat Genet 27 113 116

28. SpellRM

Jinks-RobertsonS

2004 Examination of the roles of Sgs1 and Srs2 helicases in the enforcement of recombination fidelity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 168 1855 1865

29. SugawaraN

GoldfarbT

StudamireB

AlaniE

HaberJE

2004 Heteroduplex rejection during single-strand annealing requires Sgs1 helicase and mismatch repair proteins Msh2 and Msh6 but not Pms1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101 9315 9320

30. WuL

HicksonID

2003 The Bloom's syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination. Nature 426 870 874

31. IraG

MalkovaA

LiberiG

FoianiM

HaberJE

2003 Srs2 and Sgs1-Top3 suppress crossovers during double-strand break repair in yeast. Cell 115 401 411

32. LoYC

PaffettKS

AmitO

ClikemanJA

SterkR

2006 Sgs1 regulates gene conversion tract lengths and crossovers independently of its helicase activity. Mol Cell Biol 26 4086 4094

33. MalkovaA

IvanovEL

HaberJE

1996 Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: a possible role for break-induced replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93 7131 7136

34. MullenJR

KaliramanV

BrillSJ

2000 Bipartite structure of the SGS1 DNA helicase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 154 1101 1114

35. IraG

HaberJE

2002 Characterization of RAD51-independent break-induced replication that acts preferentially with short homologous sequences. Mol Cell Biol 22 6384 6392

36. StithCM

SterlingJ

ResnickMA

GordeninDA

BurgersPM

2008 Flexibility of eukaryotic Okazaki fragment maturation through regulated strand displacement synthesis. J Biol Chem 283 34129 34140

37. MankouriHW

NgoHP

HicksonID

2009 Esc2 and Sgs1 Act in Functionally Distinct Branches of the Homologous Recombination Repair Pathway in S. cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell

38. IpSC

RassU

BlancoMG

FlynnHR

SkehelJM

2008 Identification of Holliday junction resolvases from humans and yeast. Nature 456 357 361

39. CollinsSR

MillerKM

MaasNL

RoguevA

FillinghamJ

2007 Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map. Nature 446 806 810

40. IiM

BrillSJ

2005 Roles of SGS1, MUS81, and RAD51 in the repair of lagging-strand replication defects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 48 213 225

41. TongAH

EvangelistaM

ParsonsAB

XuH

BaderGD

2001 Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294 2364 2368

42. SignonL

MalkovaA

NaylorML

KleinH

HaberJE

2001 Genetic requirements for RAD51- and RAD54-independent break-induced replication repair of a chromosomal double-strand break. Mol Cell Biol 21 2048 2056

43. LeeK

ZhangY

LeeSE

2008 Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATM orthologue suppresses break-induced chromosome translocations. Nature 454 543 546

44. MankouriHW

CraigTJ

MorganA

2002 SGS1 is a multicopy suppressor of srs2: functional overlap between DNA helicases. Nucleic Acids Res 30 1103 1113

45. LeeSE

BressanDA

PetriniJH

HaberJE

2002 Complementation between N-terminal Saccharomyces cerevisiae mre11 alleles in DNA repair and telomere length maintenance. DNA Repair (Amst) 1 27 40

46. Fishman-LobellJ

RudinN

HaberJE

1992 Two alternative pathways of double-strand break repair that are kinetically separable and independently modulated. Mol Cell Biol 12 1292 1303

47. SugawaraN

WangX

HaberJE

2003 In vivo roles of Rad52, Rad54, and Rad55 proteins in Rad51-mediated recombination. Mol Cell 12 209 219

48. JohnsonR

BordeV

NealeMJ

Bishop-BaileyA

NorthM

2007 Excess single-stranded DNA inhibits meiotic double-strand break repair. PLoS Genet 3 e223 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030223

49. MilneGT

HoT

WeaverDT

1995 Modulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA double-strand break repair by SRS2 and RAD51. Genetics 139 1189 1199

50. MantieroD

ClericiM

LucchiniG

LongheseMP

2007 Dual role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tel1 in the checkpoint response to double-strand breaks. EMBO Rep 8 380 387

51. SchmidtKH

KolodnerRD

2006 Suppression of spontaneous genome rearrangements in yeast DNA helicase mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103 18196 18201

52. MotegiA

MyungK

2007 Measuring the rate of gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A practical approach to study genomic rearrangements observed in cancer. Methods 41 168 176

53. SmithS

HwangJY

BanerjeeS

MajeedA

GuptaA

2004 Mutator genes for suppression of gross chromosomal rearrangements identified by a genome-wide screening in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101 9039 9044

54. BonettiD

MartinaM

ClericiM

LucchiniG

LongheseMP

2009 Multiple pathways regulate 3′ overhang generation at S. cerevisiae telomeres. Mol Cell 35 70 81

55. DotiwalaF

HaaseJ

Arbel-EdenA

BloomK

HaberJE

2007 The yeast DNA damage checkpoint proteins control a cytoplasmic response to DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104 11358 11363

56. BachratiCZ

BortsRH

HicksonID

2006 Mobile D-loops are a preferred substrate for the Bloom's syndrome helicase. Nucleic Acids Res 34 2269 2279

57. HuY

RaynardS

SehornMG

LuX

BussenW

2007 RECQL5/Recql5 helicase regulates homologous recombination and suppresses tumor formation via disruption of Rad51 presynaptic filaments. Genes Dev 21 3073 3084

58. JessopL

LichtenM

2008 Mus81/Mms4 endonuclease and Sgs1 helicase collaborate to ensure proper recombination intermediate metabolism during meiosis. Mol Cell 31 313 323

59. OhSD

LaoJP

HwangPY

TaylorAF

SmithGR

2007 BLM ortholog, Sgs1, prevents aberrant crossing-over by suppressing formation of multichromatid joint molecules. Cell 130 259 272

60. ChungWH

ZhuZ

PapushaA

MalkovaA

IraG

2010 Defective resection at DNA double-strand breaks leads to de novo telomere formation and enhances gene targeting. PLoS Genet 6 e948 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000948

61. MalkovaA

SignonL

SchaeferCB

NaylorML

TheisJF

2001 RAD51-independent break-induced replication to repair a broken chromosome depends on a distant enhancer site. Genes Dev 15 1055 1060

62. Cotta-RamusinoC

FachinettiD

LuccaC

DoksaniY

LopesM

2005 Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. Mol Cell 17 153 159

63. SeguradoM

DiffleyJF

2008 Separate roles for the DNA damage checkpoint protein kinases in stabilizing DNA replication forks. Genes Dev 22 1816 1827

64. ZierhutC

DiffleyJF

2008 Break dosage, cell cycle stage and DNA replication influence DNA double strand break response. EMBO J

65. AylonY

LiefshitzB

KupiecM

2004 The CDK regulates repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle. EMBO J 23 4868 4875

66. KayeJA

MeloJA

CheungSK

VazeMB

HaberJE

2004 DNA breaks promote genomic instability by impeding proper chromosome segregation. Curr Biol 14 2096 2106

67. GalgoczyDJ

ToczyskiDP

2001 Checkpoint adaptation precedes spontaneous and damage-induced genomic instability in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 21 1710 1718

68. MakovetsS

BlackburnEH

2009 DNA damage signalling prevents deleterious telomere addition at DNA breaks. Nat Cell Biol 11 1383 1386

69. MyungK

ChenC

KolodnerRD

2001 Multiple pathways cooperate in the suppression of genome instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 411 1073 1076

70. AlaniE

CaoL

KlecknerN

1987 A method for gene disruption that allows repeated use of URA3 selection in the construction of multiply disrupted yeast strains. Genetics 116 541 545

71. EissenbergJC

AyyagariR

GomesXV

BurgersPM

1997 Mutations in yeast proliferating cell nuclear antigen define distinct sites for interaction with DNA polymerase delta and DNA polymerase epsilon. Mol Cell Biol 17 6367 6378

72. VothWP

JiangYW

StillmanDJ

2003 New ‘marker swap’ plasmids for converting selectable markers on budding yeast gene disruptions and plasmids. Yeast 20 985 993

73. SikorskiRS

HieterP

1989 A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122 19 27