Analysis of Genes Reveals Redundant and Independent Functions in the Inner Ear
Lrig proteins are conserved transmembrane proteins that modulate a variety of signaling pathways from worm to humans. In mammals, there are three family members – Lrig1, Lrig2, and Lrig3 – that are defined by closely related extracellular domains with a similar arrangement of leucine rich repeats and immunoglobulin domains. However, the intracellular domains show little homology. Lrig1 inhibits EGF signaling through internalization and degradation of ErbB receptors. Although Lrig3 can also bind ErbB receptors in vitro, it is unclear whether Lrig2 and Lrig3 exhibit similar functions to Lrig1. To gain insights into Lrig gene functions in vivo, we compared the expression and function of the Lrigs in the inner ear, which offers a sensitive system for detecting effects on morphogenesis and function. We find that all three family members are expressed in the inner ear throughout development, with Lrig1 and Lrig3 restricted to subsets of cells and Lrig2 expressed more broadly. Lrig1 and Lrig3 overlap prominently in the developing vestibular apparatus and simultaneous removal of both genes disrupts inner ear morphogenesis. This suggests that these two family members act redundantly in the otic epithelium. In contrast, although Lrig1 and Lrig2 are frequently co-expressed, Lrig1−/−;Lrig2−/− double mutant ears show no enhanced structural abnormalities. At later stages, Lrig1 expression is sustained in non-sensory tissues, whereas Lrig2 levels are enhanced in neurons and sensory epithelia. Consistent with these distinct expression patterns, Lrig1 and Lrig2 mutant mice exhibit different forms of impaired auditory responsiveness. Notably, Lrig1−/−;Lrig2−/− double mutant mice display vestibular deficits and suffer from a more severe auditory defect that is accompanied by a cochlear innervation phenotype not present in single mutants. Thus, Lrig genes appear to act both redundantly and independently, with Lrig2 emerging as the most functionally distinct family member.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Analysis of Genes Reveals Redundant and Independent Functions in the Inner Ear. PLoS Genet 9(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003824
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003824
Souhrn
Lrig proteins are conserved transmembrane proteins that modulate a variety of signaling pathways from worm to humans. In mammals, there are three family members – Lrig1, Lrig2, and Lrig3 – that are defined by closely related extracellular domains with a similar arrangement of leucine rich repeats and immunoglobulin domains. However, the intracellular domains show little homology. Lrig1 inhibits EGF signaling through internalization and degradation of ErbB receptors. Although Lrig3 can also bind ErbB receptors in vitro, it is unclear whether Lrig2 and Lrig3 exhibit similar functions to Lrig1. To gain insights into Lrig gene functions in vivo, we compared the expression and function of the Lrigs in the inner ear, which offers a sensitive system for detecting effects on morphogenesis and function. We find that all three family members are expressed in the inner ear throughout development, with Lrig1 and Lrig3 restricted to subsets of cells and Lrig2 expressed more broadly. Lrig1 and Lrig3 overlap prominently in the developing vestibular apparatus and simultaneous removal of both genes disrupts inner ear morphogenesis. This suggests that these two family members act redundantly in the otic epithelium. In contrast, although Lrig1 and Lrig2 are frequently co-expressed, Lrig1−/−;Lrig2−/− double mutant ears show no enhanced structural abnormalities. At later stages, Lrig1 expression is sustained in non-sensory tissues, whereas Lrig2 levels are enhanced in neurons and sensory epithelia. Consistent with these distinct expression patterns, Lrig1 and Lrig2 mutant mice exhibit different forms of impaired auditory responsiveness. Notably, Lrig1−/−;Lrig2−/− double mutant mice display vestibular deficits and suffer from a more severe auditory defect that is accompanied by a cochlear innervation phenotype not present in single mutants. Thus, Lrig genes appear to act both redundantly and independently, with Lrig2 emerging as the most functionally distinct family member.
Zdroje
1. BellaJ, HindleKL, McEwanPA, LovellSC (2008) The leucine-rich repeat structure. Cell Mol Life Sci 65: 2307–2333.
2. de WitJ, HongW, LuoL, GhoshA (2011) Role of leucine-rich repeat proteins in the development and function of neural circuits. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 27: 697–729.
3. DolanJ, WalsheK, AlsburyS, HokampK, O'KeeffeS, et al. (2007) The extracellular leucine-rich repeat superfamily; a comparative survey and analysis of evolutionary relationships and expression patterns. BMC Genomics 8: 320.
4. MatsushimaN, TachiN, KurokiY, EnkhbayarP, OsakiM, et al. (2005) Structural analysis of leucine-rich-repeat variants in proteins associated with human diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci 62: 2771–2791.
5. KobeB, KajavaAV (2001) The leucine-rich repeat as a protein recognition motif. Curr Opin Struct Biol 11: 725–732.
6. NgAC, EisenbergJM, HeathRJ, HuettA, RobinsonCM, et al. (2011) Human leucine-rich repeat proteins: a genome-wide bioinformatic categorization and functional analysis in innate immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108 Suppl 1: 4631–4638.
7. ManessPF, SchachnerM (2007) Neural recognition molecules of the immunoglobulin superfamily: signaling transducers of axon guidance and neuronal migration. Nat Neurosci 10: 19–26.
8. Volkmer H (2001) The immunoglobulin superfamily of cell adhersion. In: Beckerle MC, editor. Cell Adhesion. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 1–29.
9. ChenY, AuliaS, LiL, TangBL (2006) AMIGO and friends: an emerging family of brain-enriched, neuronal growth modulating, type I transmembrane proteins with leucine-rich repeats (LRR) and cell adhesion molecule motifs. Brain Res Rev 51: 265–274.
10. HommaS, ShimadaT, HikakeT, YaginumaH (2009) Expression pattern of LRR and Ig domain-containing protein (LRRIG protein) in the early mouse embryo. Gene Expr Patterns 9: 1–26.
11. MacLarenCM, EvansTA, AlvaradoD, DuffyJB (2004) Comparative analysis of the Kekkon molecules, related members of the LIG superfamily. Dev Genes Evol 214: 360–366.
12. GhiglioneC, CarrawayKL (1999) The transmembrane molecule kekkon 1 acts in a feedback loop to negatively regulate the activity of the Drosophila EGF receptor during oogenesis. Cell 96: 847–856.
13. HedmanH, HenrikssonR (2007) LRIG inhibitors of growth factor signalling - double-edged swords in human cancer? Eur J Cancer 43: 676–682.
14. GuoD, HolmlundC, HenrikssonR, HedmanH (2004) The LRIG gene family has three vertebrate paralogs widely expressed in human and mouse tissues and a homolog in Ascidiacea. Genomics 84: 157–165.
15. WangY, PoulinEJ, CoffeyRJ (2013) LRIG1 is a triple threat: ERBB negative regulator, intestinal stem cell marker and tumour suppressor. Br J Cancer 108: 1765–1770.
16. GurG, RubinC, KatzM, AmitI, CitriA, et al. (2004) LRIG1 restricts growth factor signaling by enhancing receptor ubiquitylation and degradation. Embo J 23: 3270–3281.
17. LaederichMB, Funes-DuranM, YenL, IngallaE, WuX, et al. (2004) The leucine-rich repeat protein LRIG1 is a negative regulator of ErbB family receptor tyrosine kinases. J Biol Chem 279: 47050–47056.
18. RafidiH, MercadoF, AstudilloM, FryWH, SaldanaM, et al. (2013) Leucine-rich repeat and immunoglobulin domain-containing protein-1 negative (Lrig1) regulatory action towards ErbB receptor tyrosine kinases is opposed by Leucine-rich repeat and immunoglobulin domain-containing protein-3 (Lrig3). J Biol Chem 288: 21593–605.
19. JensenKB, WattFM (2006) Single-cell expression profiling of human epidermal stem and transit-amplifying cells: Lrig1 is a regulator of stem cell quiescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 11958–11963.
20. WongVW, StangeDE, PageME, BuczackiS, WabikA, et al. (2012) Lrig1 controls intestinal stem-cell homeostasis by negative regulation of ErbB signalling. Nat Cell Biol 14: 401–408.
21. PowellAE, WangY, LiY, PoulinEJ, MeansAL, et al. (2012) The pan-ErbB negative regulator Lrig1 is an intestinal stem cell marker that functions as a tumor suppressor. Cell 149: 146–158.
22. SuzukiY, MiuraH, TanemuraA, KobayashiK, KondohG, et al. (2002) Targeted disruption of LIG-1 gene results in psoriasiform epidermal hyperplasia. FEBS Lett 521: 67–71.
23. ShattuckDL, MillerJK, LaederichM, FunesM, PetersenH, et al. (2007) LRIG1 is a novel negative regulator of the Met receptor and opposes Met and Her2 synergy. Mol Cell Biol 27: 1934–1946.
24. LeddaF, BieraugelO, FardSS, VilarM, ParatchaG (2008) Lrig1 is an endogenous inhibitor of Ret receptor tyrosine kinase activation, downstream signaling, and biological responses to GDNF. J Neurosci 28: 39–49.
25. AbrairaVE, SatohT, FeketeDM, GoodrichLV (2010) Vertebrate Lrig3-ErbB interactions occur in vitro but are unlikely to play a role in Lrig3-dependent inner ear morphogenesis. PLoS One 5: e8981.
26. CaiM, HanL, ChenR, YeF, WangB, et al. (2009) Inhibition of LRIG3 gene expression via RNA interference modulates the proliferation, cell cycle, cell apoptosis, adhesion and invasion of glioblastoma cell (GL15). Cancer Lett 278: 104–112.
27. ZhaoH, TanegashimaK, RoH, DawidIB (2008) Lrig3 regulates neural crest formation in Xenopus by modulating Fgf and Wnt signaling pathways. Development 135: 1283–1293.
28. AbrairaVE, Del RioT, TuckerAF, SlonimskyJ, KeirnesHL, et al. (2008) Cross-repressive interactions between Lrig3 and netrin 1 shape the architecture of the inner ear. Development 135: 4091–4099.
29. WangB, HanL, ChenR, CaiM, HanF, et al. (2009) Downregulation of LRIG2 expression by RNA interference inhibits glioblastoma cell (GL15) growth, causes cell cycle redistribution, increases cell apoptosis and enhances cell adhesion and invasion in vitro. Cancer Biol Ther 8: 1018–1023.
30. HedmanH, LindstromAK, TotT, StendahlU, HenrikssonR, et al. (2010) LRIG2 in contrast to LRIG1 predicts poor survival in early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Acta Oncologica 49: 812–815.
31. ZhangH, YanQ, XuS, OuY, YeF, et al. (2011) Association of expression of Leucine-rich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domains 2 gene with invasiveness of pituitary adenoma. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci 31: 520–523.
32. GuoD, NilssonJ, HaapasaloH, RaheemO, BergenheimT, et al. (2006) Perinuclear leucine-rich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domain proteins (LRIG1-3) as prognostic indicators in astrocytic tumors. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 111: 238–246.
33. HolmlundC, HaapasaloH, YiW, RaheemO, BrannstromT, et al. (2009) Cytoplasmic LRIG2 expression is associated with poor oligodendroglioma patient survival. Neuropathology 29: 242–247.
34. StuartHM, RobertsNA, BurguB, DalySB, UrquhartJE, et al. (2013) LRIG2 mutations cause urofacial syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 92: 259–264.
35. WuDK, KelleyMW (2012) Molecular mechanisms of inner ear development. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4: a008409.
36. HilgertN, SmithRJ, Van CampG (2009) Function and expression pattern of nonsyndromic deafness genes. Curr Mol Med 9: 546–564.
37. StreeterGL (1906) On the development of the membranous labyrinth and the acoustic and facial nerves in the human embryo. American Journal of Anatomy 6: 139–165.
38. MitchellKJ, PinsonKI, KellyOG, BrennanJ, ZupicichJ, et al. (2001) Functional analysis of secreted and transmembrane proteins critical to mouse development. Nat Genet 28: 241–249.
39. KimSH, MarcusDC (2011) Regulation of sodium transport in the inner ear. Hear Res 280: 21–29.
40. EmmerlingMR, SobkowiczHM, LevenickCV, ScottGL, SlapnickSM, et al. (1990) Biochemical and morphological differentiation of acetylcholinesterase-positive efferent fibers in the mouse cochlea. J Electron Microsc Tech 15: 123–143.
41. NilssonJ, StarefeldtA, HenrikssonR, HedmanH (2003) LRIG1 protein in human cells and tissues. Cell Tissue Res 312: 65–71.
42. SalminenM, MeyerBI, BoberE, GrussP (2000) Netrin 1 is required for semicircular canal formation in the mouse inner ear. Development 127: 13–22.
43. RabbittRD, BrownellWE (2011) Efferent modulation of hair cell function. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 19: 376–381.
44. GumiennyTL, MacneilL, ZimmermanCM, WangH, ChinL, et al. (2010) Caenorhabditis elegans SMA-10/LRIG is a conserved transmembrane protein that enhances bone morphogenetic protein signaling. PLoS Genet 6: e1000963.
45. LeightonPA, MitchellKJ, GoodrichLV, LuX, PinsonK, et al. (2001) Defining brain wiring patterns and mechanisms through gene trapping in mice. Nature 410: 174–179.
46. MaisonSF, UsubuchiH, LibermanMC (2013) Efferent feedback minimizes cochlear neuropathy from moderate noise exposure. J Neurosci 33: 5542–5552.
47. SchneiderCA, RasbandWS, EliceiriKW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9: 671–675.
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2013 Číslo 9
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- A Genome-Wide Systematic Analysis Reveals Different and Predictive Proliferation Expression Signatures of Cancerous vs. Non-Cancerous Cells
- Recent Acquisition of by Baka Pygmies
- The Condition-Dependent Transcriptional Landscape of
- Histone Chaperone NAP1 Mediates Sister Chromatid Resolution by Counteracting Protein Phosphatase 2A