Stochastic Loss of Silencing of the Imprinted Allele, in a Mouse Model and Humans with Prader-Willi Syndrome, Has Functional Consequences

English version České info

Genomic imprinting is a process that causes genes to be expressed from one allele only according to parental origin, the other allele being silent. Diseases can arise when the normally active alleles are not expressed. In this context, low level of expression of the normally silent alleles has been considered as genetic noise although such expression has never been further studied. Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) is a neurodevelopmental disease involving imprinted genes, including NDN, which are only expressed from the paternally inherited allele, with the maternally inherited allele silent. We present the first in-depth study of the low expression of a normally silent imprinted allele, in pathological context. Using a variety of qualitative and quantitative approaches and comparing wild-type, heterozygous and homozygous mice deleted for Ndn, we show that, in absence of the paternal Ndn allele, the maternal Ndn allele is expressed at an extremely low level with a high degree of non-genetic heterogeneity. The level of this expression is sex-dependent and shows transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. In about 50% of mutant mice, this expression reduces birth lethality and severity of the breathing deficiency, correlated with a reduction in the loss of serotonergic neurons. In wild-type brains, the maternal Ndn allele is never expressed. However, using several mouse models, we reveal a competition between non-imprinted Ndn promoters which results in monoallelic (paternal or maternal) Ndn expression, suggesting that Ndn allelic exclusion occurs in the absence of imprinting regulation. Importantly, specific expression of the maternal NDN allele is also detected in post-mortem brain samples of PWS individuals. Our data reveal an unexpected epigenetic flexibility of PWS imprinted genes that could be exploited to reactivate the functional but dormant maternal alleles in PWS. Overall our results reveal high non-genetic heterogeneity between genetically identical individuals that might underlie the variability of the phenotype.

Vyšlo v časopise: Stochastic Loss of Silencing of the Imprinted Allele, in a Mouse Model and Humans with Prader-Willi Syndrome, Has Functional Consequences. PLoS Genet 9(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003752
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003752

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. ReikW, WalterJ (2001) Genomic imprintig: parental influence on the genome. Genetics 2: 21–32.

2. PrickettAR, OakeyRJ (2012) A survey of tissue-specific genomic imprinting in mammals. Mol Genet Genomics 287: 621–630.

3. JirtleRL, SkinnerMK (2007) Environmental epigenomics and disease susceptibility. Nat Rev Genet 8: 253–262.

4. MannMR, LeeSS, DohertyAS, VeronaRI, NolenLD, et al. (2004) Selective loss of imprinting in the placenta following preimplantation development in culture. Development 131: 3727–3735.

5. LimAL, Ferguson-SmithAC (2010) Genomic imprinting effects in a compromised in utero environment: implications for a healthy pregnancy. Semin Cell Dev Biol 21: 201–208.

6. JayP, RougeulleC, MassacrierA, MonclaA, MatteiMG, et al. (1997) The human necdin gene, NDN, is maternally imprinted and located in the Prader-Willi syndrome chromosomal region. Nat Genet 17: 357–361.

7. WatrinF, RoeckelN, LacroixL, MignonC, MatteiMG, et al. (1997) The mouse Necdin gene is expressed from the paternal allele only and lies in the 7C region of the mouse chromosome 7, a region of conserved synteny to the human Prader-Willi syndrome region. Eur J Hum Genet 5: 324–332.

8. MacDonaldHR, WevrickR (1997) The necdin gene is deleted in Prader-Willi syndrome and is imprinted in human and mouse. Hum Mol Genet 6: 1873–1878.

9. GerardM, HernandezL, WevrickR, StewartCL (1999) Disruption of the mouse necdin gene results in early post-natal lethality. Nat Genet 23: 199–202.

10. ChamberlainSJ, LalandeM (2010) Neurodevelopmental disorders involving genomic imprinting at human chromosome 15q11-q13. Neurobiol Dis 39: 13–20.

11. CassidySB, SchwartzS, MillerJL, DriscollDJ (2012) Prader-Willi syndrome. Genet Med 14: 10–26.

12. ButlerMG (2011) Prader-Willi Syndrome: Obesity due to Genomic Imprinting. Curr Genomics 12: 204–215.

13. McAllisterCJ, WhittingtonJE, HollandAJ (2011) Development of the eating behaviour in Prader-Willi Syndrome: advances in our understanding. Int J Obes (Lond) 35: 188–197.

14. DykensEM, LeeE, RoofE (2011) Prader-Willi syndrome and autism spectrum disorders: an evolving story. J Neurodev Disord 3: 225–237.

15. FestenDA, de WeerdAW, van den BosscheRA, JoostenK, HoeveH, et al. (2006) Sleep-related breathing disorders in pre-pubertal children with Prader-Willi Syndrome and effects of growth hormone treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91: 4911–5.

16. TauberM, DieneG, MolinasC, HebertM (2008) Review of 64 cases of death in children with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS). Am J Med Genet A 146: 881–887.

17. MuscatelliF, AbrousDN, MassacrierA, BoccaccioI, Le MoalM, et al. (2000) Disruption of the mouse Necdin gene results in hypothalamic and behavioral alterations reminiscent of the human Prader-Willi syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 9: 3101–3110.

18. TsaiTF, ArmstrongD, BeaudetAL (1999) Necdin-deficient mice do not show lethality or the obesity and infertility of Prader-Willi syndrome [letter]. Nat Genet 22: 15–16.

19. KuwakoK, HosokawaA, NishimuraI, UetsukiT, YamadaM, et al. (2005) Disruption of the paternal necdin gene diminishes TrkA signaling for sensory neuron survival. J Neurosci 25: 7090–7099.

20. RenJ, LeeS, PagliardiniS, GerardM, StewartCL, et al. (2003) Absence of Ndn, encoding the Prader-Willi syndrome-deleted gene necdin, results in congenital deficiency of central respiratory drive in neonatal mice. J Neurosci 23: 1569–1573.

21. AndrieuD, MezianeH, MarlyF, AngelatsC, FernandezPA, et al. (2006) Sensory defects in Necdin deficient mice result from a loss of sensory neurons correlated within an increase of developmental programmed cell death. BMC Dev Biol 6: 56.

22. ZanellaS, WatrinF, MebarekS, MarlyF, RousselM, et al. (2008) Necdin plays a role in the serotonergic modulation of the mouse respiratory network: implication for Prader-Willi syndrome. J Neurosci 28: 1745–1755.

23. RajA, RifkinSA, AndersenE, van OudenaardenA (2010) Variability in gene expression underlies incomplete penetrance. Nature 463: 913–918.

24. AndrieuD, WatrinF, NiinobeM, YoshikawaK, MuscatelliF, et al. (2003) Expression of the Prader-Willi gene Necdin during mouse nervous system development correlates with neuronal differentiation and p75NTR expression. Gene Expr Patterns 3: 761–765.

25. SchneiderE, PliushchG, El HajjN, GaletzkaD, PuhlA, et al. (2010) Spatial, temporal and interindividual epigenetic variation of functionally important DNA methylation patterns. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 3880–3890.

26. HanelML, WevrickR (2001) Establishment and maintenance of DNA methylation patterns in mouse Ndn: implications for maintenance of imprinting in target genes of the imprinting center. Mol Cell Biol 21: 2384–2392.

27. ChamberlainSJ, JohnstoneKA, DuBoseAJ, SimonTA, BartolomeiMS, et al. (2004) Evidence for genetic modifiers of postnatal lethality in PWS-IC deletion mice. Hum Mol Genet 13: 2971–2977.

28. RoganPK, SeipJR, WhiteLM, WengerSL, SteeleMW, et al. (1998) Relaxation of imprinting in Prader-Willi syndrome [In Process Citation]. Hum Genet 103: 694–701.

29. MuralidharB, MarneyA, ButlerMG (1999) Analysis of imprinted genes in subjects with Prader-Willi syndrome and chromosome 15 abnormalities. Genet Med 1: 141–145.

30. JelinicP, ShawP (2007) Loss of imprinting and cancer. J Pathol 211: 261–268.

31. ZucchiFC, YaoY, MetzGA (2012) The secret language of destiny: stress imprinting and transgenerational origins of disease. Front Genet 3: 96.

32. XuJ, DengX, DistecheCM (2008) Sex-specific expression of the X-linked histone demethylase gene Jarid1c in brain. PLoS One 3: e2553.

33. TuranN, KatariS, CoutifarisC, SapienzaC (2010) Explaining inter-individual variability in phenotype: is epigenetics up to the challenge? Epigenetics 5: 16–19.

34. WuN, LiZ, SuY (2012) The association between oxytocin receptor gene polymorphism (OXTR) and trait empathy. J Affect Disord 138: 468–472.

35. XuN, TsaiCL, LeeJT (2006) Transient homologous chromosome pairing marks the onset of X inactivation. Science 311: 1149–1152.

36. ThatcherKN, PeddadaS, YasuiDH, LasalleJM (2005) Homologous pairing of 15q11-13 imprinted domains in brain is developmentally regulated but deficient in Rett and autism samples. Hum Mol Genet 14: 785–797.

37. KruegerC, KingMR, KruegerF, BrancoMR, OsborneCS, et al. (2012) Pairing of homologous regions in the mouse genome is associated with transcription but not imprinting status. PLoS ONE 7: e38983.

38. VogelC, MarcotteEM (2012) Insights into the regulation of protein abundance from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses. Nat Rev Genet 13: 227–232.

39. DahanO, GingoldH, PilpelY (2011) Regulatory mechanisms and networks couple the different phases of gene expression. Trends Genet 27: 316–322.

40. PujadasE, FeinbergAP (2012) Regulated noise in the epigenetic landscape of development and disease. Cell 148: 1123–1131.

41. AebischerJ, SturnyR, AndrieuD, RieussetA, SchallerF, et al. (2011) Necdin protects embryonic motoneurons from programmed cell death. PLoS One 6: e23764.

42. MoralesA, BonnetC, BourgoinN, TouvierT, NadamJ, et al. (2006) Unexpected expression of orexin-B in basal conditions and increased levels in the adult rat hippocampus during pilocarpine-induced epileptogenesis. Brain Res 1109: 164–175.

43. WatrinF, Le MeurE, RoeckelN, RipocheMA, DandoloL, et al. (2005) The Prader-Willi syndrome murine imprinting center is not involved in the spatio-temporal transcriptional regulation of the Necdin gene. BMC Genet 6: 1.

44. RufN, BahringS, GaletzkaD, PliushchG, LuftFC, et al. (2007) Sequence-based bioinformatic prediction and QUASEP identify genomic imprinting of the KCNK9 potassium channel gene in mouse and human. Hum Mol Genet 16: 2591–2599.

45. HollandPM, AbramsonRD, WatsonR, GelfandDH (1991) Detection of specific polymerase chain reaction product by utilizing the 5′––3′ exonuclease activity of Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88: 7276–7280.

46. LivakKJ (1999) Allelic discrimination using fluorogenic probes and the 5′ nuclease assay. Genet Anal 14: 143–149.

47. PrissetteM, El-MaarriO, ArnaudD, WalterJ, AvnerP (2001) Methylation profiles of DXPas34 during the onset of X-inactivation. Hum Mol Genet 10: 31–38.

48. OlekA, OswaldJ, WalterJ (1996) A modified and improved method for bisulphite based cytosine methylation analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 24: 5064–5066.

49. GongS, YangXW, LiC, HeintzN (2002) Highly efficient modification of bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) using novel shuttle vectors containing the R6Kgamma origin of replication. Genome Res 12: 1992–1998.

50. ShanL, LiuCQ, BalesarR, HofmanMA, BaoAM, et al. (2012) Neuronal histamine production remains unaltered in Parkinson's disease despite the accumulation of Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites in the tuberomamillary nucleus. Neurobiol Aging 33: 1343–1344.

51. PasterkampRJ, De WinterF, HoltmaatAJ, VerhaagenJ (1998) Evidence for a role of the chemorepellent semaphorin III and its receptor neuropilin-1 in the regeneration of primary olfactory axons. J Neurosci 18: 9962–9976.

52. UnmehopaUA, van HeerikhuizeJJ, SpijkstraW, WoodsJW, HowardAD, et al. (2005) Increased melanin concentrating hormone receptor type I in the human hypothalamic infundibular nucleus in cachexia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90: 2412–2419.