Tracking of Chromosome and Replisome Dynamics in Reveals a Novel Chromosome Arrangement
Cells closely coordinate cell division with chromosome replication and segregation; however, the mechanisms responsible for this coordination still remain largely unknown. Here, we analyzed the spatial arrangement and temporal dynamics of the 9.1 Mb circular chromosome in the rod-shaped cells of Myxococcus xanthus. For chromosome segregation, M. xanthus uses a parABS system, which is essential, and lack of ParB results in chromosome segregation defects as well as cell divisions over nucleoids and the formation of anucleate cells. From the determination of the dynamic subcellular location of six genetic loci, we conclude that in newborn cells ori, as monitored following the ParB/parS complex, and ter regions are localized in the subpolar regions of the old and new cell pole, respectively and each separated from the nearest pole by approximately 1 µm. The bulk of the chromosome is arranged between the two subpolar regions, thus leaving the two large subpolar regions devoid of DNA. Upon replication, one ori region remains in the original subpolar region while the second copy segregates unidirectionally to the opposite subpolar region followed by the rest of the chromosome. In parallel, the ter region of the mother chromosome relocates, most likely passively, to midcell, where it is replicated. Consequently, after completion of replication and segregation, the two chromosomes show an ori-ter-ter-ori arrangement with mirror symmetry about a transverse axis at midcell. Upon completion of segregation of the ParB/parS complex, ParA localizes in large patches in the DNA-free subpolar regions. Using an Ssb-YFP fusion as a proxy for replisome localization, we observed that the two replisomes track independently of each other from a subpolar region towards ter. We conclude that M. xanthus chromosome arrangement and dynamics combine features from previously described systems with new features leading to a novel spatiotemporal arrangement pattern.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Tracking of Chromosome and Replisome Dynamics in Reveals a Novel Chromosome Arrangement. PLoS Genet 9(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003802
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003802
Souhrn
Cells closely coordinate cell division with chromosome replication and segregation; however, the mechanisms responsible for this coordination still remain largely unknown. Here, we analyzed the spatial arrangement and temporal dynamics of the 9.1 Mb circular chromosome in the rod-shaped cells of Myxococcus xanthus. For chromosome segregation, M. xanthus uses a parABS system, which is essential, and lack of ParB results in chromosome segregation defects as well as cell divisions over nucleoids and the formation of anucleate cells. From the determination of the dynamic subcellular location of six genetic loci, we conclude that in newborn cells ori, as monitored following the ParB/parS complex, and ter regions are localized in the subpolar regions of the old and new cell pole, respectively and each separated from the nearest pole by approximately 1 µm. The bulk of the chromosome is arranged between the two subpolar regions, thus leaving the two large subpolar regions devoid of DNA. Upon replication, one ori region remains in the original subpolar region while the second copy segregates unidirectionally to the opposite subpolar region followed by the rest of the chromosome. In parallel, the ter region of the mother chromosome relocates, most likely passively, to midcell, where it is replicated. Consequently, after completion of replication and segregation, the two chromosomes show an ori-ter-ter-ori arrangement with mirror symmetry about a transverse axis at midcell. Upon completion of segregation of the ParB/parS complex, ParA localizes in large patches in the DNA-free subpolar regions. Using an Ssb-YFP fusion as a proxy for replisome localization, we observed that the two replisomes track independently of each other from a subpolar region towards ter. We conclude that M. xanthus chromosome arrangement and dynamics combine features from previously described systems with new features leading to a novel spatiotemporal arrangement pattern.
Zdroje
1. CheesemanIM, DesaiA (2008) Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 33–46.
2. WangX, LlopisPM, RudnerDZ (2013) Organization and segregation of bacterial chromosomes. Nat Rev Genet 14: 191–203.
3. ViollierPH, ThanbichlerM, McGrathPT, WestL, MeewanM, et al. (2004) Rapid and sequential movement of individual chromosomal loci to specific subcellular locations during bacterial DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 9257–9262.
4. WangX, LiuX, PossozC, SherrattDJ (2006) The two Escherichia coli chromosome arms locate to separate cell halves. Genes Dev 20: 1727–1731.
5. WebbCD, GraumannPL, KahanaJA, TelemanAA, SilverPA, et al. (1998) Use of time-lapse microscopy to visualize rapid movement of the replication origin region of the chromosome during the cell cycle in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 28: 883–892.
6. TelemanAA, GraumannPL, LinDC, GrossmanAD, LosickR (1998) Chromosome arrangement within a bacterium. Curr Biol 8: 1102–1109.
7. NielsenHJ, LiY, YoungrenB, HansenFG, AustinS (2006) Progressive segregation of the Escherichia coli chromosome. Mol Microbiol 61: 383–393.
8. EspeliO, MercierR, BoccardF (2008) DNA dynamics vary according to macrodomain topography in the E. coli chromosome. Mol Microbiol 68: 1418–1427.
9. Vallet-GelyI, BoccardF (2013) Chromosomal organization and segregation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Genet 9: e1003492.
10. Reyes-LamotheR, PossozC, DanilovaO, SherrattDJ (2008) Independent positioning and action of Escherichia coli replisomes in live cells. Cell 133: 90–102.
11. KaguniJM (2011) Replication initiation at the Escherichia coli chromosomal origin. Curr Opin Chem Biol 15: 606–613.
12. HendricksonH, LawrenceJG (2007) Mutational bias suggests that replication termination occurs near the dif site, not at Ter sites. Mol Microbiol 64: 42–56.
13. EspeliO, MariansKJ (2004) Untangling intracellular DNA topology. Mol Microbiol 52: 925–931.
14. SherrattDJ, ArciszewskaLK, CrozatE, GrahamJE, GraingeI (2010) The Escherichia coli DNA translocase FtsK. Biochem Soc Trans 38: 395–398.
15. LivnyJ, YamaichiY, WaldorMK (2007) Distribution of centromere-like parS sites in bacteria: Insights from comparative genomics. J Bacteriol 189: 8693–8703.
16. IretonK, GuntherNW, GrossmanAD (1994) spo0J is required for normal chromosome segregation as well as the initiation of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 176: 5320–5329.
17. MarstonAL, ErringtonJ (1999) Dynamic movement of the ParA-like Soj protein of B. subtilis and its dual role in nucleoid organization and developmental regulation. Mol Cell 4: 673–682.
18. GerdesK, HowardM, SzardeningsF (2010) Pushing and pulling in prokaryotic DNA segregation. Cell 141: 927–942.
19. LinDC-H, GrossmanAD (1998) Identification and characterization of a bacterial chromosome partitioning site. Cell 92: 675–685.
20. JakimowiczD, ChaterK, Zakrzewska-CzerwinskaJ (2002) The ParB protein of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) recognizes a cluster of parS sequences within the origin-proximal region of the linear chromosome. Mol Microbiol 45: 1365–1377.
21. DonovanC, SchwaigerA, KramerR, BramkampM (2010) Subcellular localization and characterization of the ParAB system from Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Bacteriol 192: 3441–3451.
22. BartosikAA, LasockiK, MierzejewskaJ, ThomasCM, Jagura-BurdzyG (2004) ParB of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Interactions with its partner ParA and its target parS and specific effects on bacterial growth. J Bacteriol 186: 6983–6998.
23. MohlDA, GoberJW (1997) Cell cycle–dependent polar localization of chromosome partitioning proteins in Caulobacter crescentus. Cell 88: 675–684.
24. PtacinJL, LeeSF, GarnerEC, ToroE, EckartM, et al. (2010) A spindle-like apparatus guides bacterial chromosome segregation. Nat Cell Biol 12: 791–798.
25. LeonardTA, ButlerJP, LöweJ (2005) Bacterial chromosome segregation: structure and DNA binding of the Soj dimer — a conserved biological switch. EMBO J 24: 270–282.
26. HesterCM, LutkenhausJ (2007) Soj (ParA) DNA binding is mediated by conserved arginines and is essential for plasmid segregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 20326–20331.
27. RobertsMA, WadhamsGH, HadfieldKA, TicknerS, ArmitageJP (2012) ParA-like protein uses nonspecific chromosomal DNA binding to partition protein complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 6698–6703.
28. FogelMA, WaldorMK (2006) A dynamic, mitotic-like mechanism for bacterial chromosome segregation. Genes Dev 20: 3269–3282.
29. SchofieldWB, LimHC, Jacobs-WagnerC (2010) Cell cycle coordination and regulation of bacterial chromosome segregation dynamics by polarly localized proteins. EMBO J 29: 3068–3081.
30. WangX, PossozC, SherrattDJ (2005) Dancing around the divisome: asymmetric chromosome segregation in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev 19: 2367–2377.
31. MigockiMD, LewisPJ, WakeRG, HarryEJ (2004) The midcell replication factory in Bacillus subtilis is highly mobile: implications for coordinating chromosome replication with other cell cycle events. Mol Microbiol 54: 452–463.
32. BerkmenMB, GrossmanAD (2006) Spatial and temporal organization of the Bacillus subtilis replication cycle. Mol Microbiol 62: 57–71.
33. JensenRB, WangSC, ShapiroL (2001) A moving DNA replication factory in Caulobacter crescentus. EMBO J 20: 4952–4963.
34. KonovalovaA, PettersT, Søgaard-AndersenL (2010) Extracellular biology of Myxococcus xanthus. FEMS Microbiol Rev 34: 89–106.
35. TzengL, EllisTN, SingerM (2006) DNA replication during aggregation phase is essential for Myxococcus xanthus development. J Bacteriol 188: 2774–2779.
36. RosarioCJ, SingerM (2007) The Myxococcus xanthus developmental program can be delayed by inhibition of DNA replication. J Bacteriol 189: 8793–8800.
37. TzengLF, SingerM (2005) DNA replication during sporulation in Myxococcus xanthus fruiting bodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 14428–14433.
38. ZusmanD, RosenbergE (1970) DNA cycle of Myxococcus xanthus. J Mol Biol 49: 609–619.
39. Treuner-LangeA, AguiluzK, van der DoesC, Gómez-SantosN, HarmsA, et al. (2013) PomZ, a ParA-like protein, regulates Z-ring formation and cell division in Myxococcus xanthus. Mol Microbiol 87: 235–253.
40. GoldmanBS, NiermanWC, KaiserD, SlaterSC, DurkinAS, et al. (2006) Evolution of sensory complexity recorded in a myxobacterial genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 15200–15205.
41. CarnoyC, RotenCA (2009) The dif/Xer recombination systems in proteobacteria. PLoS One 4: e6531.
42. KochMK, McHughCA, HoiczykE (2011) BacM, an N-terminally processed bactofilin of Myxococcus xanthus, is crucial for proper cell shape. Mol Microbiol 80: 1031–1051.
43. KhareD, ZiegelinG, LankaE, HeinemannU (2004) Sequence-specific DNA binding determined by contacts outside the helix-turn-helix motif of the ParB homolog KorB. Nat Struct Mol Biol 11: 656–663.
44. AutretS, NairR, ErringtonJ (2001) Genetic analysis of the chromosome segregation protein Spo0J of Bacillus subtilis: evidence for separate domains involved in DNA binding and interactions with Soj protein. Mol Microbiol 41: 743–755.
45. NikiH, YamaichiY, HiragaS (2000) Dynamic organization of chromosomal DNA in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev 14: 212–223.
46. GlaserP, SharpeME, RaetherB, PeregoM, OhlsenK, et al. (1997) Dynamic, mitotic-like behavior of a bacterial protein required for accurate chromosome partitioning. Genes Dev 11: 1160–1168.
47. LinDC-H, LevinPA, GrossmanAD (1997) Bipolar localization of a chromosome partition protein in Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94: 4721–4726.
48. MaloneyE, MadirajuM, RajagopalanM (2009) Overproduction and localization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis ParA and ParB proteins. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 89 Suppl 1: S65–69.
49. CharakaVK, MisraHS (2012) Functional characterization of the role of the chromosome I partitioning system in genome segregation in Deinococcus radiodurans. J Bacteriol 194: 5739–5748.
50. ToroE, HongSH, McAdamsHH, ShapiroL (2008) Caulobacter requires a dedicated mechanism to initiate chromosome segregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 15435–15440.
51. LauIF, FilipeSR, SøballeB, ØkstadO-A, BarreF-X, et al. (2003) Spatial and temporal organization of replicating Escherichia coli chromosomes. Mol Microbiol 49: 731–743.
52. GordonGS, SitnikovD, WebbCD, TelemanA, StraightA, et al. (1997) Chromosome and low copy plasmid segregation in E. coli: Visual evidence for distinct mechanisms. Cell 90: 1113–1121.
53. SheredaRD, KozlovAG, LohmanTM, CoxMM, KeckJL (2008) SSB as an organizer/mobilizer of genome maintenance complexes. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 43: 289–318.
54. MohlDA, EasterJ, GoberJW (2001) The chromosome partitioning protein, ParB, is required for cytokinesis in Caulobacter crescentus. Mol Microbiol 42: 741–755.
55. YamaichiY, FogelMA, WaldorMK (2007) par genes and the pathology of chromosome loss in Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 630–635.
56. ShiX, Wegener-FeldbrüggeS, HuntleyS, HamannN, HedderichR, et al. (2008) Bioinformatics and experimental analysis of proteins of two-component systems in Myxococcus xanthus. J Bacteriol 190: 613–624.
57. Gómez-SantosN, Treuner-LangeA, Moraleda-MuñozA, García-BravoE, García-HernándezR, et al. (2012) A comprehensive set of integrative plasmid vectors for copper-inducible gene expression in Myxococcus xanthus. Appl Environ Microbiol 78: 2515–2521.
58. BowmanGR, ComolliLR, ZhuJ, EckartM, KoenigM, et al. (2008) A polymeric protein anchors the chromosomal origin/ParB complex at a bacterial cell pole. Cell 134: 945–955.
59. EbersbachG, BriegelA, JensenGJ, Jacobs-WagnerC (2008) A self-associating protein critical for chromosome attachment, division, and polar organization in Caulobacter. Cell 134: 956–968.
60. Ben-YehudaS, RudnerDZ, LosickR (2003) RacA, a bacterial protein that anchors chromosomes to the cell poles. Science 299: 532–536.
61. LenarcicR, HalbedelS, VisserL, ShawM, WuLJ, et al. (2009) Localisation of DivIVA by targeting to negatively curved membranes. EMBO J 28: 2272–2282.
62. DonovanC, SiegerB, KrämerR, BramkampM (2012) A synthetic Escherichia coli system identifies a conserved origin tethering factor in Actinobacteria. Mol Microbiol 84: 105–116.
63. YamaichiY, BrucknerR, RinggaardS, MollA, CameronDE, et al. (2012) A multidomain hub anchors the chromosome segregation and chemotactic machinery to the bacterial pole. Genes Dev 26: 2348–2360.
64. BarillaD, RosenbergMF, NobbmannU, HayesF (2005) Bacterial DNA segregation dynamics mediated by the polymerizing protein ParF. EMBO J 24: 1453–1464.
65. BarillaD, CarmeloE, HayesF (2007) The tail of the ParG DNA segregation protein remodels ParF polymers and enhances ATP hydrolysis via an arginine finger-like motif. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 1811–1816.
66. PrattoF, CicekA, WeihofenWA, LurzR, SaengerW, et al. (2008) Streptococcus pyogenes pSM19035 requires dynamic assembly of ATP-bound ParA and ParB on parS DNA during plasmid segregation. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 3676–3689.
67. RinggaardS, van ZonJ, HowardM, GerdesK (2009) Movement and equipositioning of plasmids by ParA filament disassembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 19369–19374.
68. EbersbachG, RinggaardS, Moller-JensenJ, WangQ, SherrattDJ, et al. (2006) Regular cellular distribution of plasmids by oscillating and filament-forming ParA ATPase of plasmid pB171. Mol Microbiol 61: 1428–1442.
69. BulyhaI, HotE, HuntleyS, Søgaard-AndersenL (2011) GTPases in bacterial cell polarity and signalling. Cur Opin Microbiol 14: 726–733.
70. DingwallA, ShapiroL (1989) Rate, origin, and bidirectionality of Caulobacter chromosome replication as determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86: 119–123.
71. MinnenA, AttaiechL, ThonM, GruberS, VeeningJW (2011) SMC is recruited to oriC by ParB and promotes chromosome segregation in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Mol Microbiol 81: 676–688.
72. ThanbichlerM, ShapiroL (2006) MipZ, a spatial regulator coordinating chromosome segregation with cell division in Caulobacter. Cell 126: 147–162.
73. Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning : a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
74. Søgaard-AndersenL, SlackFJ, KimseyH, KaiserD (1996) Intercellular C-signaling in Myxococcus xanthus involves a branched signal transduction pathway. Genes Dev 10: 740–754.
75. WuSS, WuJ, KaiserD (1997) The Myxococcus xanthus pilT locus is required for social gliding motility although pili are still produced. Mol Microbiol 23: 109–121.
76. KuhnJ, BriegelA, MorschelE, KahntJ, LeserK, et al. (2010) Bactofilins, a ubiquitous class of cytoskeletal proteins mediating polar localization of a cell wall synthase in Caulobacter crescentus. EMBO J 29: 327–339.
77. JulienB, KaiserAD, GarzaA (2000) Spatial control of cell differentiation in Myxococcus xanthus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 9098–9103.
78. BulyhaI, SchmidtC, LenzP, JakovljevicV, HoneA, et al. (2009) Regulation of the type IV pili molecular machine by dynamic localization of two motor proteins. Mol Microbiol 74: 691–706.
79. LeonardyS, FreymarkG, HebenerS, EllehaugeE, Sogaard-AndersenL (2007) Coupling of protein localization and cell movements by a dynamically localized response regulator in Myxococcus xanthus. EMBO J 26: 4433–4444.
80. LillieSH, BrownSS (1987) Artifactual immunofluorescent labelling in yeast, demonstrated by affinity purification of antibody. Yeast 3: 63–70.
81. KaiserD (1979) Social gliding is correlated with the presence of pili in Myxococcus xanthus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76: 5952–5956.
82. KatohK, KumaK, TohH, MiyataT (2005) MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 511–518.
83. PriceMN, DehalPS, ArkinAP (2010) FastTree 2–approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 5: e9490.
84. Motallebi-VesharehM, RouchDA, ThomasCM (1990) A family of ATPases involved in active partitioning of diverse bacterial plasmids. Mol Microbiol 4: 1455–1463.
85. KooninEV (1993) A superfamily of ATPases with diverse functions containing either classical or deviant ATP-binding motif. J Mol Biol 229: 1165–1174.
86. SurteesJA, FunnellBE (1999) P1 ParB domain structure includes two independent multimerization domains. J Bacteriol 181: 5898–5908.
87. DelbruckH, ZiegelinG, LankaE, HeinemannU (2002) An Src homology 3-like domain is responsible for dimerization of the repressor protein KorB encoded by the promiscuous IncP plasmid RP4. J Biol Chem 277: 4191–4198.
88. LeonardTA, ButlerPJ, LöweJ (2004) Structural analysis of the chromosome segregation protein Spo0J from Thermus thermophilus. Mol Microbiol 53: 419–432.
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2013 Číslo 9
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- A Genome-Wide Systematic Analysis Reveals Different and Predictive Proliferation Expression Signatures of Cancerous vs. Non-Cancerous Cells
- Recent Acquisition of by Baka Pygmies
- The Condition-Dependent Transcriptional Landscape of
- Histone Chaperone NAP1 Mediates Sister Chromatid Resolution by Counteracting Protein Phosphatase 2A