Cell Interactions and Patterned Intercalations Shape and Link Epithelial Tubes in
Many animal organs are composed largely or entirely of polarized epithelial tubes, and the formation of complex organ systems, such as the digestive or vascular systems, requires that separate tubes link with a common polarity. The Caenorhabditis elegans digestive tract consists primarily of three interconnected tubes—the pharynx, valve, and intestine—and provides a simple model for understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms used to form and connect epithelial tubes. Here, we use live imaging and 3D reconstructions of developing cells to examine tube formation. The three tubes develop from a pharynx/valve primordium and a separate intestine primordium. Cells in the pharynx/valve primordium polarize and become wedge-shaped, transforming the primordium into a cylindrical cyst centered on the future lumenal axis. For continuity of the digestive tract, valve cells must have the same, radial axis of apicobasal polarity as adjacent intestinal cells. We show that intestinal cells contribute to valve cell polarity by restricting the distribution of a polarizing cue, laminin. After developing apicobasal polarity, many pharyngeal and valve cells appear to explore their neighborhoods through lateral, actin-rich lamellipodia. For a subset of cells, these lamellipodia precede more extensive intercalations that create the valve. Formation of the valve tube begins when two valve cells become embedded at the left-right boundary of the intestinal primordium. Other valve cells organize symmetrically around these two cells, and wrap partially or completely around the orthogonal, lumenal axis, thus extruding a small valve tube from the larger cyst. We show that the transcription factors DIE-1 and EGL-43/EVI1 regulate cell intercalations and cell fates during valve formation, and that the Notch pathway is required to establish the proper boundary between the pharyngeal and valve tubes.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Cell Interactions and Patterned Intercalations Shape and Link Epithelial Tubes in. PLoS Genet 9(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003772
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003772
Souhrn
Many animal organs are composed largely or entirely of polarized epithelial tubes, and the formation of complex organ systems, such as the digestive or vascular systems, requires that separate tubes link with a common polarity. The Caenorhabditis elegans digestive tract consists primarily of three interconnected tubes—the pharynx, valve, and intestine—and provides a simple model for understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms used to form and connect epithelial tubes. Here, we use live imaging and 3D reconstructions of developing cells to examine tube formation. The three tubes develop from a pharynx/valve primordium and a separate intestine primordium. Cells in the pharynx/valve primordium polarize and become wedge-shaped, transforming the primordium into a cylindrical cyst centered on the future lumenal axis. For continuity of the digestive tract, valve cells must have the same, radial axis of apicobasal polarity as adjacent intestinal cells. We show that intestinal cells contribute to valve cell polarity by restricting the distribution of a polarizing cue, laminin. After developing apicobasal polarity, many pharyngeal and valve cells appear to explore their neighborhoods through lateral, actin-rich lamellipodia. For a subset of cells, these lamellipodia precede more extensive intercalations that create the valve. Formation of the valve tube begins when two valve cells become embedded at the left-right boundary of the intestinal primordium. Other valve cells organize symmetrically around these two cells, and wrap partially or completely around the orthogonal, lumenal axis, thus extruding a small valve tube from the larger cyst. We show that the transcription factors DIE-1 and EGL-43/EVI1 regulate cell intercalations and cell fates during valve formation, and that the Notch pathway is required to establish the proper boundary between the pharyngeal and valve tubes.
Zdroje
1. LubarskyB, KrasnowMA (2003) Tube morphogenesis: making and shaping biological tubes. Cell 112: 19–28.
2. LittleM, GeorgasK, PennisiD, WilkinsonL (2010) Kidney development: two tales of tubulogenesis. Curr Top Dev Biol 90: 193–229.
3. UvA, CanteraR, SamakovlisC (2003) Drosophila tracheal morphogenesis: intricate cellular solutions to basic plumbing problems. Trends Cell Biol 13: 301–309.
4. BlumY, BeltingH, EllertsdottirE, HerwigL, LüdersF, et al. (2008) Complex cell rearrangements during intersegmental vessel sprouting and vessel fusion in the zebrafish embryo. Dev Biol 316: 312–322.
5. HerwigL, BlumY, KrudewigA, EllertsdottirE, LenardA, et al. (2011) Distinct cellular mechanisms of blood vessel fusion in the zebrafish embryo. Curr Biol 21: 1942–1948.
6. JazwinskaA, RibeiroC, AffolterM (2003) Epithelial tube morphogenesis during Drosophila tracheal development requires Piopio, a luminal ZP protein. Nat Cell Biol 5: 895–901.
7. DongB, HorieT, DenkerE, KusakabeT, TsudaM, et al. (2009) Tube formation by complex cellular processes in Ciona intestinalis notochord. Dev Biol 330: 237–249.
8. HerbertSP, HuiskenJ, KimTN, FeldmanME, HousemanBT, et al. (2009) Arterial-venous segregation by selective cell sprouting: an alternative mode of blood vessel formation. Science 326: 294–298.
9. SulstonJE, SchierenbergE, WhiteJG, ThomsonJN (1983) The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 100: 64–119.
10. AlbertsonDG, ThomsonJN (1976) The pharynx of Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 275: 299–325.
11. LeungB, HermannGJ, PriessJR (1999) Organogenesis of the Caenorhabditis elegans intestine. Dev Biol 216: 114–134.
12. RasmussenJP, ReddySS, PriessJR (2012) Laminin is required to orient epithelial polarity in the C. elegans pharynx. Development 139: 2050–2060.
13. HornerMA, QuintinS, DomeierME, KimbleJ, LabouesseM, et al. (1998) pha-4, an HNF-3 homolog, specifies pharyngeal organ identity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes Dev 12: 1947–1952.
14. MangoSE, LambieEJ, KimbleJ (1994) The pha-4 gene is required to generate the pharyngeal primordium of Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 120: 3019–3031.
15. KalbJM, LauKK, GoszczynskiB, FukushigeT, MoonsD, et al. (1998) pha-4 is Ce-fkh-1, a fork head/HNF-3alpha,beta,gamma homolog that functions in organogenesis of the C. elegans pharynx. Development 125: 2171–2180.
16. SantellaA, DuZ, NowotschinS, HadjantonakisAK, BaoZ (2010) A hybrid blob-slice model for accurate and efficient detection of fluorescence labeled nuclei in 3D. BMC Bioinformatics 11: 580.
17. SmitRB, SchnabelR, GaudetJ (2008) The HLH-6 transcription factor regulates C. elegans pharyngeal gland development and function. PLoS Genet 4: e1000222.
18. RaharjoWH, GhaiV, DineenA, BastianiM, GaudetJ (2011) Cell Architecture: Surrounding Muscle Cells Shape Gland Cell Morphology in the Caenorhabditis elegans Pharynx. Genetics 189: 885–897.
19. MörckC, AxängC, PilonM (2003) A genetic analysis of axon guidance in the C elegans pharynx. Dev Biol 260: 158–175.
20. PortereikoMF, MangoSE (2001) Early morphogenesis of the Caenorhabditis elegans pharynx. Dev Biol 233: 482–494.
21. PortereikoMF, SaamJ, MangoSE (2004) ZEN-4/MKLP1 is required to polarize the foregut epithelium. Curr Biol 14: 932–941.
22. RasmussenJ, EnglishK, TenlenJ, PriessJ (2008) Notch signaling and morphogenesis of single-cell tubes in the C. elegans digestive tract. Dev Cell 14: 559–569.
23. KachurTM, AudhyaA, PilgrimDB (2008) UNC-45 is required for NMY-2 contractile function in early embryonic polarity establishment and germline cellularization in C. elegans. Dev Biol 314: 287–299.
24. SymM, RobinsonN, KenyonC (1999) MIG-13 positions migrating cells along the anteroposterior body axis of C. elegans. Cell 98: 25–36.
25. FakhouriTH, StevensonJ, ChisholmAD, MangoSE (2010) Dynamic chromatin organization during foregut development mediated by the organ selector gene PHA-4/FoxA. PLoS Genet 6: e1001060.
26. WehmanAM, PoggioliC, SchweinsbergP, GrantBD, NanceJ (2011) The P4-ATPase TAT-5 inhibits the budding of extracellular vesicles in C. elegans embryos. Curr Biol 21: 1951–1959.
27. EdgleyML, RiddleDL (2001) LG II balancer chromosomes in Caenorhabditis elegans: mT1(II;III) and the mIn1 set of dominantly and recessively marked inversions. Mol Genet Genomics 266: 385–395.
28. HeidPJ, RaichWB, SmithR, MohlerWA, SimokatK, et al. (2001) The zinc finger protein DIE-1 is required for late events during epithelial cell rearrangement in C. elegans. Dev Biol 236: 165–180.
29. EdwardsKA, DemskyM, MontagueRA, WeymouthN, KiehartDP (1997) GFP-moesin illuminates actin cytoskeleton dynamics in living tissue and demonstrates cell shape changes during morphogenesis in Drosophila. Dev Biol 191: 103–117.
30. ShayeDD, CasanovaJ, LlimargasM (2008) Modulation of intracellular trafficking regulates cell intercalation in the Drosophila trachea. Nat Cell Biol 10: 964–970.
31. KaneDA, McFarlandKN, WargaRM (2005) Mutations in half baked/E-cadherin block cell behaviors that are necessary for teleost epiboly. Development 132: 1105–1116.
32. AchilleosA, WehmanAM, NanceJ (2010) PAR-3 mediates the initial clustering and apical localization of junction and polarity proteins during C. elegans intestinal epithelial cell polarization. Development 137: 1833–1842.
33. CostaM, RaichW, AgbunagC, LeungB, HardinJ, et al. (1998) A putative catenin-cadherin system mediates morphogenesis of the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. J Cell Biol 141: 297–308.
34. RaichWB, AgbunagC, HardinJ (1999) Rapid epithelial-sheet sealing in the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo requires cadherin-dependent filopodial priming. Curr Biol 9: 1139–1146.
35. NevesA, PriessJR (2005) The REF-1 family of bHLH transcription factors pattern C. elegans embryos through Notch-dependent and Notch-independent pathways. Dev Cell 8: 867–879.
36. NevesA, EnglishK, PriessJR (2007) Notch-GATA synergy promotes endoderm-specific expression of ref-1 in C. elegans. Development 134: 4459–4468.
37. AltunZ, ChenB, WangZ, HallD (2009) High resolution map of Caenorhabditis elegans gap junction proteins. Dev Dyn 238: 1936–1950.
38. HarrisTW, AntoshechkinI, BieriT, BlasiarD, ChanJ, et al. (2010) WormBase: a comprehensive resource for nematode research. Nucleic Acids Res 38: D463–467.
39. StegerKA, ShtondaBB, ThackerC, SnutchTP, AveryL (2005) The C. elegans T-type calcium channel CCA-1 boosts neuromuscular transmission. J Exp Biol 208: 2191–2203.
40. GaudetJ, MangoSE (2002) Regulation of organogenesis by the Caenorhabditis elegans FoxA protein PHA-4. Science 295: 821–825.
41. AveryL, HorvitzHR (1989) Pharyngeal pumping continues after laser killing of the pharyngeal nervous system of C. elegans. Neuron 3: 473–485.
42. GarrigaG, GuentherC, HorvitzH (1993) Migrations of the Caenorhabditis elegans HSNs are regulated by egl-43, a gene encoding two zinc finger proteins. Genes Dev 7: 2097–2109.
43. HwangB, MerueloA, SternbergP (2007) C. elegans EVI1 proto-oncogene, EGL-43, is necessary for Notch-mediated cell fate specification and regulates cell invasion. Development 134: 669–679.
44. RimannI, HajnalA (2007) Regulation of anchor cell invasion and uterine cell fates by the egl-43 Evi-1 proto-oncogene in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 308: 187–195.
45. ZhangY, SicotG, CuiX, VogelM, WuertzerCA, et al. (2011) Targeting a DNA binding motif of the EVI1 protein by a pyrrole-imidazole polyamide. Biochemistry 50: 10431–10441.
46. SigurdsonD, SpanierG, HermanR (1984) Caenorhabditis elegans deficiency mapping. Genetics 108: 331–345.
47. BaumP, GuentherC, FrankC, PhamB, GarrigaG (1999) The Caenorhabditis elegans gene ham-2 links Hox patterning to migration of the HSN motor neuron. Genes Dev 13: 472–483.
48. Bard-ChapeauEA, JeyakaniJ, KokCH, MullerJ, ChuaBQ, et al. (2012) Ecotopic viral integration site 1 (EVI1) regulates multiple cellular processes important for cancer and is a synergistic partner for FOS protein in invasive tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 2168–2173.
49. FunabikiT, KreiderBL, IhleJN (1994) The carboxyl domain of zinc fingers of the Evi-1 myeloid transforming gene binds a consensus sequence of GAAGATGAG. Oncogene 9: 1575–1581.
50. GaudetJ, MuttumuS, HornerM, MangoSE (2004) Whole-genome analysis of temporal gene expression during foregut development. PLoS Biol 2: e352.
51. Broitman-MaduroG, LinKT, HungWW, MaduroMF (2006) Specification of the C. elegans MS blastomere by the T-box factor TBX-35. Development 133: 3097–3106.
52. Broitman-MaduroG, OwraghiM, HungWW, KuntzS, SternbergPW, et al. (2009) The NK-2 class homeodomain factor CEH-51 and the T-box factor TBX-35 have overlapping function in C. elegans mesoderm development. Development 136: 2735–2746.
53. Williams-MassonEM, HeidPJ, LavinCA, HardinJ (1998) The cellular mechanism of epithelial rearrangement during morphogenesis of the Caenorhabditis elegans dorsal hypodermis. Dev Biol 204: 263–276.
54. MattilaPK, LappalainenP (2008) Filopodia: molecular architecture and cellular functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 446–454.
55. WangX, RoyPJ, HollandSJ, ZhangLW, CulottiJG, et al. (1999) Multiple ephrins control cell organization in C. elegans using kinase-dependent and -independent functions of the VAB-1 Eph receptor. Mol Cell 4: 903–913.
56. BischoffM, SchnabelR (2006) Global cell sorting is mediated by local cell-cell interactions in the C. elegans embryo. Dev Biol 294: 432–444.
57. SchnabelR, BischoffM, HintzeA, SchulzAK, HejnolA, et al. (2006) Global cell sorting in the C. elegans embryo defines a new mechanism for pattern formation. Dev Biol 294: 418–431.
58. CohenM, GeorgiouM, StevensonNL, MiodownikM, BaumB (2010) Dynamic filopodia transmit intermittent Delta-Notch signaling to drive pattern refinement during lateral inhibition. Dev Cell 19: 78–89.
59. ChangS, JohnstonRJ, Frøkjaer-JensenC, LockeryS, HobertO (2004) MicroRNAs act sequentially and asymmetrically to control chemosensory laterality in the nematode. Nature 430: 785–789.
60. LyeCM, SansonB (2011) Tension and epithelial morphogenesis in Drosophila early embryos. Curr Top Dev Biol 95: 145–187.
61. BraySJ (2006) Notch signalling: a simple pathway becomes complex. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7: 678–689.
62. HermannGJ, LeungB, PriessJR (2000) Left-right asymmetry in C. elegans intestine organogenesis involves a LIN-12/Notch signaling pathway. Development 127: 3429–3440.
63. HarfeBD, FireA (1998) Muscle and nerve-specific regulation of a novel NK-2 class homeodomain factor in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 125: 421–429.
64. HousdenBE, FuAQ, KrejciA, BernardF, FischerB, et al. (2013) Transcriptional dynamics elicited by a short pulse of notch activation involves feed-forward regulation by E(spl)/Hes genes. PLoS Genet 9: e1003162.
65. ChristensenS, KodoyianniV, BosenbergM, FriedmanL, KimbleJ (1996) lag-1, a gene required for lin-12 and glp-1 signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans, is homologous to human CBF1 and Drosophila Su(H). Development 122: 1373–1383.
66. LinR, HillRJ, PriessJR (1998) POP-1 and anterior-posterior fate decisions in C. elegans embryos. Cell 92: 229–239.
67. ParkFD, PriessJR (2003) Establishment of POP-1 asymmetry in early C. elegans embryos. Development 130: 3547–3556.
68. HuangS, ShettyP, RobertsonSM, LinR (2007) Binary cell fate specification during C. elegans embryogenesis driven by reiterated reciprocal asymmetry of TCF POP-1 and its coactivator beta-catenin SYS-1. Development 134: 2685–2695.
69. CardonaA, SaalfeldS, SchindelinJ, Arganda-CarrerasI, PreibischS, et al. (2012) TrakEM2 software for neural circuit reconstruction. PLoS One 7: e38011.
70. MullenG, RogalskiT, BushJ, GorjiP, MoermanD (1999) Complex patterns of alternative splicing mediate the spatial and temporal distribution of perlecan/UNC-52 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Biol Cell 10: 3205–3221.
71. FrancisR, WaterstonRH (1991) Muscle cell attachment in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol 114: 465–479.
72. SteinLD, Thierry-MiegJ (1998) Scriptable access to the Caenorhabditis elegans genome sequence and other ACEDB databases. Genome Res 8: 1308–1315.
73. SinhaS, BlanchetteM, TompaM (2004) PhyME: a probabilistic algorithm for finding motifs in sets of orthologous sequences. BMC Bioinformatics 5: 170.
74. BrudnoM, DoCB, CooperGM, KimMF, DavydovE, et al. (2003) LAGAN and Multi-LAGAN: efficient tools for large-scale multiple alignment of genomic DNA. Genome Res 13: 721–731.
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2013 Číslo 9
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- A Genome-Wide Systematic Analysis Reveals Different and Predictive Proliferation Expression Signatures of Cancerous vs. Non-Cancerous Cells
- Recent Acquisition of by Baka Pygmies
- The Condition-Dependent Transcriptional Landscape of
- Histone Chaperone NAP1 Mediates Sister Chromatid Resolution by Counteracting Protein Phosphatase 2A