RNA Editome in Rhesus Macaque Shaped by Purifying Selection
RNA editing is a co-transcriptional process that introduces differences between RNA and its corresponding DNA sequence. Currently, the next generation sequencing have allowed study of the editome in a comprehensive and efficient manner. However, fundamental issues involving accurate mapping of the editome as well as its regulation and functional outcome remain unresolved. To further unveil the underlying mechanisms from the evolutionary perspective, we report here the editome profile in rhesus macaque, one of our closest evolutionary relatives. We identified a list of 31,250 RNA-editing sites and deciphered an accurate and informative editome across multiple tissues and animals. We found that the adenosine deamination is associated with the macaque editome, in that both the sequence context and the expression profile of ADARs are relevant factors in determining the quantitative variance of RNA editing across different sites and tissue types. Importantly, some of these RNA-editing events represent functional regulation, rather than neutral signals, as suggested by substitution valley of decreased divergence detected around the editing sites, an indication of selective constraint in maintaining some of these editing substrates with their double-stranded structure. The macaque editome thus provides an informative evolutionary context for an in-depth understanding of RNA editing regulation.
Vyšlo v časopise:
RNA Editome in Rhesus Macaque Shaped by Purifying Selection. PLoS Genet 10(4): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004274
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004274
Souhrn
RNA editing is a co-transcriptional process that introduces differences between RNA and its corresponding DNA sequence. Currently, the next generation sequencing have allowed study of the editome in a comprehensive and efficient manner. However, fundamental issues involving accurate mapping of the editome as well as its regulation and functional outcome remain unresolved. To further unveil the underlying mechanisms from the evolutionary perspective, we report here the editome profile in rhesus macaque, one of our closest evolutionary relatives. We identified a list of 31,250 RNA-editing sites and deciphered an accurate and informative editome across multiple tissues and animals. We found that the adenosine deamination is associated with the macaque editome, in that both the sequence context and the expression profile of ADARs are relevant factors in determining the quantitative variance of RNA editing across different sites and tissue types. Importantly, some of these RNA-editing events represent functional regulation, rather than neutral signals, as suggested by substitution valley of decreased divergence detected around the editing sites, an indication of selective constraint in maintaining some of these editing substrates with their double-stranded structure. The macaque editome thus provides an informative evolutionary context for an in-depth understanding of RNA editing regulation.
Zdroje
1. BenneR, Van den BurgJ, BrakenhoffJP, SloofP, Van BoomJH, et al. (1986) Major transcript of the frameshifted coxII gene from trypanosome mitochondria contains four nucleotides that are not encoded in the DNA. Cell 46: 819–826.
2. MaasS (2012) Posttranscriptional recoding by RNA editing. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol 86: 193–224.
3. JuYS, KimJI, KimS, HongD, ParkH, et al. (2011) Extensive genomic and transcriptional diversity identified through massively parallel DNA and RNA sequencing of eighteen Korean individuals. Nat Genet 43: 745–752.
4. LiJB, LevanonEY, YoonJK, AachJ, XieB, et al. (2009) Genome-wide identification of human RNA editing sites by parallel DNA capturing and sequencing. Science 324: 1210–1213.
5. LiM, WangIX, LiY, BruzelA, RichardsAL, et al. (2011) Widespread RNA and DNA sequence differences in the human transcriptome. Science 333: 53–58.
6. BahnJH, LeeJH, LiG, GreerC, PengG, et al. (2012) Accurate identification of A-to-I RNA editing in human by transcriptome sequencing. Genome Res 22: 142–150.
7. PengZ, ChengY, TanBC, KangL, TianZ, et al. (2012) Comprehensive analysis of RNA-Seq data reveals extensive RNA editing in a human transcriptome. Nat Biotechnol 30: 253–260.
8. KleinmanCL, MajewskiJ (2012) Comment on “Widespread RNA and DNA sequence differences in the human transcriptome”. Science 335: 1302; author reply 1302.
9. LinW, PiskolR, TanMH, LiJB (2012) Comment on “Widespread RNA and DNA sequence differences in the human transcriptome”. Science 335: 1302; author reply 1302.
10. PickrellJK, GiladY, PritchardJK (2012) Comment on “Widespread RNA and DNA sequence differences in the human transcriptome”. Science 335: 1302; author reply 1302.
11. HaydenEC (2011) Evidence of altered RNA stirs debate. Nature 473: 432.
12. SchriderDR, GoutJF, HahnMW (2011) Very few RNA and DNA sequence differences in the human transcriptome. PLoS One 6: e25842.
13. JacobsMM, FoggRL, EmesonRB, StanwoodGD (2009) ADAR1 and ADAR2 expression and editing activity during forebrain development. Dev Neurosci 31: 223–237.
14. SergeevaOA, AmbergerBT, HaasHL (2007) Editing of AMPA and serotonin 2C receptors in individual central neurons, controlling wakefulness. Cell Mol Neurobiol 27: 669–680.
15. GreenbergerS, LevanonEY, Paz-YaacovN, BarzilaiA, SafranM, et al. (2010) Consistent levels of A-to-I RNA editing across individuals in coding sequences and non-conserved Alu repeats. BMC Genomics 11: 608.
16. BirneyE, StamatoyannopoulosJA, DuttaA, GuigoR, GingerasTR, et al. (2007) Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature 447: 799–816.
17. GommansWM, MullenSP, MaasS (2009) RNA editing: a driving force for adaptive evolution? Bioessays 31: 1137–1145.
18. BassB, HundleyH, LiJB, PengZ, PickrellJ, et al. (2012) The Difficult Calls in RNA Editing. Nat Biotechnol 30: 1207–1209.
19. ZhangSJ, LiuCJ, ShiM, KongL, ChenJY, et al. (2012) RhesusBase: a knowledgebase for the monkey research community. Nucleic Acids Res 41: D892–905.
20. ZhangSJ, LiuCJ, YuP, ZhongX, ChenJY, et al. (2014) Evolutionary Interrogation of Human Biology in Well-annotated Genomic Framework of Rhesus Macaque. Mol Biol Evol In press. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu084
21. RamaswamiG, LinW, PiskolR, TanMH, DavisC, et al. (2012) Accurate identification of human Alu and non-Alu RNA editing sites. Nat Methods 9: 579–581.
22. ZhangX, GoodsellJ, NorgrenRBJr (2012) Limitations of the rhesus macaque draft genome assembly and annotation. BMC Genomics 13: 206.
23. LevanonEY, HalleggerM, KinarY, ShemeshR, Djinovic-CarugoK, et al. (2005) Evolutionarily conserved human targets of adenosine to inosine RNA editing. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 1162–1168.
24. OhlsonJ, PedersenJS, HausslerD, OhmanM (2007) Editing modifies the GABA(A) receptor subunit alpha3. RNA 13: 698–703.
25. PaschenW, HedreenJC, RossCA (1994) RNA editing of the glutamate receptor subunits GluR2 and GluR6 in human brain tissue. J Neurochem 63: 1596–1602.
26. ChiangHR, SchoenfeldLW, RubyJG, AuyeungVC, SpiesN, et al. (2010) Mammalian microRNAs: experimental evaluation of novel and previously annotated genes. Genes Dev 24: 992–1009.
27. BrawandD, SoumillonM, NecsuleaA, JulienP, CsardiG, et al. (2011) The evolution of gene expression levels in mammalian organs. Nature 478: 343–348.
28. LehmannKA, BassBL (2000) Double-stranded RNA adenosine deaminases ADAR1 and ADAR2 have overlapping specificities. Biochemistry 39: 12875–12884.
29. EggingtonJM, GreeneT, BassBL (2011) Predicting sites of ADAR editing in double-stranded RNA. Nat Commun 2: 319.
30. KleinbergerY, EisenbergE (2010) Large-scale analysis of structural, sequence and thermodynamic characteristics of A-to-I RNA editing sites in human Alu repeats. BMC Genomics 11: 453.
31. YangY, LvJ, GuiB, YinH, WuX, et al. (2008) A-to-I RNA editing alters less-conserved residues of highly conserved coding regions: implications for dual functions in evolution. RNA 14: 1516–1525.
32. TianN, WuX, ZhangY, JinY (2008) A-to-I editing sites are a genomically encoded G: implications for the evolutionary significance and identification of novel editing sites. RNA 14: 211–216.
33. LiY, VinckenboschN, TianG, Huerta-SanchezE, JiangT, et al. (2010) Resequencing of 200 human exomes identifies an excess of low-frequency non-synonymous coding variants. Nat Genet 42: 969–972.
34. HoopengardnerB, BhallaT, StaberC, ReenanR (2003) Nervous system targets of RNA editing identified by comparative genomics. Science 301: 832–836.
35. BlakeJA, DolanM, DrabkinH, HillDP, NiL, et al. (2012) The Gene Ontology: enhancements for 2011. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D559–564.
36. YeoJ, GoodmanRA, SchirleNT, DavidSS, BealPA (2010) RNA editing changes the lesion specificity for the DNA repair enzyme NEIL1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 20715–20719.
37. JacobF (1977) Evolution and tinkering. Science 196: 1161–1166.
38. ZhangY, LiuXS, LiuQR, WeiL (2006) Genome-wide in silico identification and analysis of cis natural antisense transcripts (cis-NATs) in ten species. Nucleic Acids Res 34: 3465–3475.
39. XieC, ZhangYE, ChenJY, LiuCJ, ZhouWZ, et al. (2012) Hominoid-Specific De Novo Protein-Coding Genes Originating from Long Non-Coding RNAs. PLoS Genet 8: e1002942.
40. LevanonEY, EisenbergE, YelinR, NemzerS, HalleggerM, et al. (2004) Systematic identification of abundant A-to-I editing sites in the human transcriptome. Nat Biotechnol 22: 1001–1005.
41. Paz-YaacovN, LevanonEY, NevoE, KinarY, HarmelinA, et al. (2010) Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing shapes transcriptome diversity in primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 12174–12179.
42. ParkhomchukD, BorodinaT, AmstislavskiyV, BanaruM, HallenL, et al. (2009) Transcriptome analysis by strand-specific sequencing of complementary DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 37: e123.
43. CarmiS, BorukhovI, LevanonEY (2011) Identification of widespread ultra-edited human RNAs. PLoS Genet 7: e1002317.
44. FumagalliD, GavinPG, TaniyamaY, KimSI, ChoiHJ, et al. (2010) A rapid, sensitive, reproducible and cost-effective method for mutation profiling of colon cancer and metastatic lymph nodes. BMC Cancer 10: 101.
45. RinkevichFD, SchweitzerPA, ScottJG (2012) Antisense sequencing improves the accuracy and precision of A-to-I editing measurements using the peak height ratio method. BMC Res Notes 5: 63.
46. VacicV, IakouchevaLM, RadivojacP (2006) Two Sample Logo: a graphical representation of the differences between two sets of sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 22: 1536–1537.
47. MerkinJ, RussellC, ChenP, BurgeCB (2012) Evolutionary dynamics of gene and isoform regulation in Mammalian tissues. Science 338: 1593–1599.
48. BenjaminiY, HochbergY (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 57: 289–300.
49. DreszerTR, KarolchikD, ZweigAS, HinrichsAS, RaneyBJ, et al. (2012) The UCSC Genome Browser database: extensions and updates 2011. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D918–923.
50. Toll-RieraM, LaurieS, AlbaMM (2011) Lineage-specific variation in intensity of natural selection in mammals. Mol Biol Evol 28: 383–398.
51. IrimiaM, DenucA, FerranJL, PernauteB, PuellesL, et al. (2012) Evolutionarily conserved A-to-I editing increases protein stability of the alternative splicing factor Nova1. RNA Biol 9: 12–21.
52. DanielC, WahlstedtH, OhlsonJ, BjorkP, OhmanM (2011) Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing affects trafficking of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptor. J Biol Chem 286: 2031–2040.
53. GaleanoF, LeroyA, RossettiC, GromovaI, GautierP, et al. (2010) Human BLCAP transcript: new editing events in normal and cancerous tissues. Int J Cancer 127: 127–137.
54. Godfried SieC, HeslerS, MaasS, KuchkaM (2012) IGFBP7's susceptibility to proteolysis is altered by A-to-I RNA editing of its transcript. FEBS Lett 586: 2313–2317.
55. NachmanyH, WaldS, AbekasisM, BulvikS, WeilM (2012) Two potential biomarkers identified in mesenchymal stem cells and leukocytes of patients with sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Dis Markers 32: 211–220.
56. SommerB, KohlerM, SprengelR, SeeburgPH (1991) RNA editing in brain controls a determinant of ion flow in glutamate-gated channels. Cell 67: 11–19.
57. GregerIH, KhatriL, ZiffEB (2002) RNA editing at arg607 controls AMPA receptor exit from the endoplasmic reticulum. Neuron 34: 759–772.
58. BrusaR, ZimmermannF, KohDS, FeldmeyerD, GassP, et al. (1995) Early-onset epilepsy and postnatal lethality associated with an editing-deficient GluR-B allele in mice. Science 270: 1677–1680.
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2014 Číslo 4
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- The Sequence-Specific Transcription Factor c-Jun Targets Cockayne Syndrome Protein B to Regulate Transcription and Chromatin Structure
- Genetic Predisposition to In Situ and Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast
- Widespread Use of Non-productive Alternative Splice Sites in
- RNA Editome in Rhesus Macaque Shaped by Purifying Selection