Protein O-Glucosyltransferase 1 (POGLUT1) Promotes Mouse Gastrulation through Modification of the Apical Polarity Protein CRUMBS2
Post-translational addition of sugar chains is essential for normal activity of many secreted and transmembrane proteins and dozens of human genetic diseases are associated with congenital disorders of glycosylation. Protein O-glucosyltransferase 1 (POGLUT1), which is essential for early mouse development, catalyzes the addition of O-glucose to extracellular EGF repeats of proteins, including NOTCH1. Here we show that mouse POGLUT1 modifies NOTCH1 in vivo; however, the essential role of POGLUT1 in gastrulation is due to POGLUT1-dependent glycosylation of EGF repeats in the apical polarity protein CRUMBS2. In contrast to findings in Drosophila, where modification of Crumbs by POGLUT1 is not required, mouse POGLUT1 is required for the activity of CRUMBS2: the unmodified protein fails to localize to the apical membrane and the gastrulation defects of Poglut1 mutants are indistinguishable from those of Crumbs2 mutants. Human mutations in POGLUT1 cause Dowling-Degos Disease type 4; the hyperpigmentation associated with this autosomal dominant disease was previously attributed to altered Notch signaling, but our results suggest that this disease and other POGLUT1-associated phenotypes may be due to altered activity of CRUMBS proteins.
Published in the journal:
Protein O-Glucosyltransferase 1 (POGLUT1) Promotes Mouse Gastrulation through Modification of the Apical Polarity Protein CRUMBS2. PLoS Genet 11(10): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005551
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005551
Summary
Post-translational addition of sugar chains is essential for normal activity of many secreted and transmembrane proteins and dozens of human genetic diseases are associated with congenital disorders of glycosylation. Protein O-glucosyltransferase 1 (POGLUT1), which is essential for early mouse development, catalyzes the addition of O-glucose to extracellular EGF repeats of proteins, including NOTCH1. Here we show that mouse POGLUT1 modifies NOTCH1 in vivo; however, the essential role of POGLUT1 in gastrulation is due to POGLUT1-dependent glycosylation of EGF repeats in the apical polarity protein CRUMBS2. In contrast to findings in Drosophila, where modification of Crumbs by POGLUT1 is not required, mouse POGLUT1 is required for the activity of CRUMBS2: the unmodified protein fails to localize to the apical membrane and the gastrulation defects of Poglut1 mutants are indistinguishable from those of Crumbs2 mutants. Human mutations in POGLUT1 cause Dowling-Degos Disease type 4; the hyperpigmentation associated with this autosomal dominant disease was previously attributed to altered Notch signaling, but our results suggest that this disease and other POGLUT1-associated phenotypes may be due to altered activity of CRUMBS proteins.
Introduction
Glycosylation can regulate protein stability and function by ensuring efficient protein folding and by altering the binding affinity to interacting partners [1–7]. The biological importance of this type of protein modification is highlighted by dozens of human diseases caused by congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDGs), which are categorized based the chemical linkage, the added sugar, and the enzymes mutated in affected individuals [8–10]. Developmental defects in mice with mutations in glycosyltransferases have defined specific developmental roles for protein glycosylation in FGF and Notch signaling and in the composition of the extracellular matrix [11–18].
Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) repeats are cysteine-containing motifs of about 40 amino acids found in many transmembrane and secreted proteins, including the Crumbs proteins and members of the Notch family receptors and ligands. EGF repeats can mediate ligand-receptor interactions and facilitate protein folding, and these interactions can be modified by glycosylation [4, 5]. EGF repeats can be modified by three types of O-linked glycosylation: O-fucosylation, O-GlcNAcylation and O-glucosylation. O-Fucose is added to the serine or threonine in the consensus C2-X-X-X-X-(S/T)-C3 (where Cx refers to the conserved cysteines in the EGF repeats) [19], O-GlcNAc to the serine or threonine in the putative consensus C5XXGX(S/T)GXXC6 [20] and O-glucose to the serine in the consensus sequence C1-X-S-X-(P/A)-C2 [21]. Specific enzymes add these sugars to EGF repeats: Protein O-fucosyltransferase 1 (POFUT1) [22], EGF-specific O-GlcNAc transferase (EOGT) [23] and Protein O-glucosyltransferase 1 (POGLUT1) [24], respectively. POFUT1 and POGLUT1 are essential for development in both Drosophila and mammals [13, 24–26].
POGLUT1 (also called KTELC1 or human CAP10-like protein 46KD (hCLP46) [27, 28]) is the only mammalian enzyme known to add O-glucose to the EGF repeats of NOTCH [24]. Drosophila Poglut1 (Rumi) was identified in a genetic screen based on its role in Notch signaling and was shown to modify the EGF repeats on the extracellular domain of Notch receptor. Rumi mutants have a temperature dependent defect in Notch signaling: at high temperature, the Notch receptor is not cleaved after binding to its ligand, preventing formation of the active Notch intracellular domain (NICD), whereas Notch proteolysis is normal at low temperature. O-glucosylation does not appear to affect ligand binding, and the data suggest it is required to couple binding of ligand to proteolytic activation of the receptor [24]. Mammalian POGLUT1 was identified based on homology to the Drosophila protein and was also shown to have O-glucosyltransferase activity [13, 29]. Inactivation of mouse Poglut1 causes midgestation lethality with defects in neural tube development, somitogenesis, cardiogenesis, and vascular remodeling [13]. Knockdown of mouse Poglut1 decreases Notch signaling in C2C12 cells, but does not strongly affect the levels of cell surface Notch protein or the binding of NOTCH to its ligand; instead, like the Drosophila protein, POGLUT1-dependent modification appears to affect mouse Notch activity at a step between ligand binding and S3 cleavage of NOTCH [13]. A number of other proteins contain predicted sites of POGLUT1 modification [13], including Drosophila Crumbs and mammalian CRUMBS1 and CRUMBS2.
Crumbs family proteins have essential, evolutionarily conserved roles in the organization and integrity of epithelia. Mammals have three members of the Crumbs family (CRUMBS1, CRUMBS2 and CRUMBS3). CRUMBS1 and CRUMBS2 have large extracellular domains that include multiple EGF-like repeats, and CRUMBS3 is a short membrane-anchored protein that includes the conserved cytoplasmic domain. Humans and mice that lack Crumbs1 are viable but experience light-dependent retinal degeneration [30]. Mice lacking Crumbs3 die shortly after birth due to defects in lung and intestinal epithelia [31]. Mouse Crumbs2 mutants arrest at mid-gestation with a variety of morphological defects that have been attributed to a defective polarity in the epiblast [32].
We isolated an ENU-induced mutation called wsnp (wing-shaped neural plate) based on its striking abnormal morphology at midgestation, including a deficit of mesoderm and a completely open neural plate [33]. Here we show that wsnp is a null allele of Poglut1 and that Notch signaling is almost completely blocked in Poglut1wsnp embryos in vivo. However, the phenotype of Poglut1wsnp and Poglut1-/- mutant embryos is more severe than the phenotype caused by complete loss of Notch signaling, suggesting that POGLUT1 has additional targets during mouse embryonic development. We noted that the early phenotype of Poglut1 mutant embryos was similar to that described for Crumbs2 [32] and strongly resembled that of another ENU-induced mutant characterized in the gene encoding Erythrocyte protein band 4.1l5 (Epb4.1l5), which can interact with the intracellular domain of Crumbs proteins [34–36]. Here we show that CRUMBS2 must be O-glucosylated by POGLUT1 for its activity during the mammalian gastrulation epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). In the absence of POGLUT1, CRUMBS2 is trapped in the endoplasmic reticulum and is not trafficked to the apical plasma membrane. The data show that this trafficking defect causes a complete loss of CRUMBS2 function and argue that the loss of apical CRUMBS2 is responsible for the gastrulation defects seen in Poglut1 null embryos.
Results
An ENU-induced null allele of Poglut1 causes midgestation lethality with characteristic morphological defects
We isolated the wing-shaped neural plate (wsnp) mutant in a screen for ENU (N-ethyl N-nitrosourea)-induced recessive mutations that disrupt the morphology of the mid-gestation embryo [33, 37]. The mutants at E8.5 had a shortened anterior-posterior body axis, lacked Pax3+ somites (Fig 1A) and had a flat SOX2+ neural epithelium that failed to close and form a neural tube (Fig 1B). Sonic hedgehog (Shh) is expressed along the midline notochordal plate of wild-type E8.5 embryos, whereas wsnp mutants had discontinuous patches of midline Shh expression, demonstrating a disruption in specification or morphogenesis of the mesendoderm (Fig 1C). Despite the reduction in mesoderm-derived tissues in wsnp mutants, they formed a single primitive streak on the posterior side of the embryo, as seen by markers of Nodal and Wnt signaling (S1 Fig).
We mapped wsnp to a 407 kb interval between the D16Mit90 and D16Mit12 SSLP markers. Exonic sequences in this interval were captured and SOLiD sequencing identified a single nucleotide substitution in the interval (see Methods), a T to C transition in the splice donor site of intron 3 of Poglut1, an endoplasmic reticulum resident enzyme that adds O-glucose to EGF repeats of proteins [24]. The wsnp mutation resulted in abnormally spliced products that lacked most of the CAP10 catalytic domain and the KTEL ER-retention signal, and was therefore likely to be a strong loss-of-function allele (Fig 1D). We generated a null allele of the gene from embryonic stem cells from the International Mouse Knockout Project (Poglut1 Δ; Materials and Methods). Poglut1wsnp/Δ embryos showed the same midgestation lethality and abnormal morphology seen in wsnp/wsnp and Poglut1Δ /Poglut1Δ embryos, demonstrating that wsnp was a null allele of Poglut1 (Fig 1E). The embryonic phenotype of the wsnp and Poglut1 Δ/Δ homozygotes resembled that reported previously for a gene trap allele of the gene [13].
Because of its ubiquitous expression in the embryo (S2A Fig), we tested whether POGLUT1 activity was required in the epiblast-derived or extraembryonic tissues of the embryo. We generated embryos in which Poglut1 was deleted specifically in the epiblast using the conditional allele derived from the International Mouse Knockout Project allele and the Sox2-Cre transgene [38]. Poglut1 epiblast-deleted embryos died before E9.0 and were indistinguishable from wsnp mutants, with reduced and unsegmented paraxial mesoderm and a flat neural plate (S2C Fig). Thus, POGLUT1 activity is required in the embryonic tissues for normal development.
POGLUT1 is required for Notch signaling in the mouse in vivo
Knockdown of Poglut1 in mammalian cell lines decreases Notch signaling [13] but a direct effect of POGLUT1 on Notch signaling has not been studied in an in vivo context. To determine whether Notch signaling was altered in Poglut1wsnp embryos, we tested whether NOTCH was correctly processed to form NICD, the active transcription factor form of the protein. In wild-type E8.5 embryos, most of the Notch protein was active, as assayed by the presence of active NOTCH1 in whole embryo lysates probed with the antibody that specifically recognizes the ϒ-secretase cleaved (S3 cleaved, Val1744) active NOTCH1 [39] (Fig 2A). The amount of NICD was greatly reduced (6.9 ± 1.3 fold) in Poglut1wsnp mutants (Fig 2A). In parallel, an antibody to the intracellular domain that detects both full-length and active NOTCH1 confirmed that active NOTCH1 was decreased in Poglut1wsnp mutants, while the full-length unprocessed form was more abundant in Poglut1wsnp embryos than in wild type (Fig 2A).
By immunostaining, NICD was detected around the node (Fig 2B) and in the nascent mesoderm cells emerging from the primitive streak in wild-type embryos (Fig 2C), similar to previous findings [40]. Active NOTCH1 was greatly reduced in Poglut1wsnp mutants by this assay, in either the distal view or in sections through the primitive streak (Fig 2B and 2C). Consistent with the lack of active NOTCH1 protein, the expression of direct transcriptional targets of the Notch pathway, Hes5, Lunatic Fringe and Hes7, was strongly reduced in Poglut1wsnp mutants compared to wild type at E8.5 (Fig 2D–2F).
CRUMBS2 as a target of POGLUT1
Although the data show that POGLUT1 is required for normal Notch signaling in the mouse embryo, the phenotypes of Poglut1 mutant embryos were more severe than the phenotypes of Notch pathway mutants. Mammals have four Notch proteins and multiple ligands, and compound mutants lacking all of the receptors have not been analyzed. However, mammals have only a single gene encoding the essential transcriptional NICD co-factor Rbpjk and two Presenilin genes that can cleave Notch proteins to their active form. Rbpjk mutants and Presenilin double mutants differentiate mesoderm-derived structures, including somites, and close their neural tubes [41, 42], unlike Poglut1wsnp embryos. Thus POGLUT1 appears to have additional, Notch-independent activities in the early mouse embryo.
In addition to the Notch family of receptors and ligands, over 40 proteins in the mouse genome contain predicted POGLUT1 modification sites [13]. Among these proteins, CRUMBS1 and CRUMBS2 have extracellular EGF repeats that could be modified by POGLUT1 (Fig 3A), and the Crumbs2-/- embryonic phenotype appeared to be similar to that of Poglut1 mutants [32], making it a good candidate for a POGLUT1 target. Indeed, recent studies showed that Drosophila Crumbs can be modified by addition of O-glucose, although that modification is not required for the function of Drosophila Crumbs [43]. Consistent with a difference in post-translational modification, we found that CRUMBS2 protein from Poglut1wsnp mutant embryonic extracts at E8.5 migrated more rapidly than CRUMBS2 protein from wild-type embryos (Fig 3B).
The extracellular domain of full-length CRUMBS2 is modified directly by POGLUT1 in vivo
To analyze whether CRUMBS2 was a direct target of POGLUT1 in vivo, we needed to purify microgram amounts of CRUMBS2 protein from wild type and mutants. We therefore generated wild-type and Poglut1wsnp mutant embryonic stem cells (ES cells) from mouse blastocysts under 2i+LIF conditions [44] and expressed full-length CRUMBS2 with a V5-tag in these cells. ES cells are not epithelial and therefore did not express high levels of endogenous CRUMBS2. After differentiation, wild-type embryoid bodies (EBs) at day 6, which is equivalent to E8.5 of mouse gestation, expressed endogenous CRUMBS2 (Fig 3C). EBs derived from Poglut1wsnp mutant ES cells also expressed endogenous CRUMBS2, but it migrated more rapidly than the protein derived from wild-type embryoid bodies (Fig 3C), as seen in embryos (Fig 3B). We therefore used wild-type and Poglut1wsnp EBs for biochemical analysis.
We purified the full-length V5-tagged CRUMBS2 from wild-type and mutant EBs (S3A Fig), and subjected the proteins to chymotrypic digestion and analyzed by nanoLC-MS/MS as previously described [45]. Analysis of a peptide derived from EGF repeat 6 of CRUMBS2 purified from wild-type embryoid bodies showed that it was modified by the addition of an O-glucose trisaccharide, in which the O-glucose was elongated by the addition of two xylose residues (Fig 3D; S3B Fig). This trisaccharide glycoform is also found on the EGF repeats of mammalian NOTCH1 containing the POGLUT1 consensus sequence for O-glucosylation [13, 21, 46]. This sugar modification was absent in EGF repeat 6 of CRUMBS2 purified from Poglut1wsnp embryoid bodies. Instead, the unmodified peptide was the only species detectable in the Poglut1wsnp mutants (Fig 3E; S3C Fig). These data demonstrate that EGF repeat 6 in the extracellular domain of the full-length CRUMBS2 protein was O-glucosylated by POGLUT1 in vivo.
POGLUT1 is required for cell surface localization of CRUMBS2
The observed difference in migration on SDS-PAGE between CRUMBS2 protein from Poglut1wsnp and wild-type embryos and embryoid bodies (Fig 3B and 3C) was greater than could be accounted for simply by loss of O-glycosylation and suggested that there might be differences in N-glycosylation that takes place in the ER and the Golgi. To test this, we treated the CRUMBS2 protein purified from embryoid bodies with Endoglycosidase H (Endo H) or Peptide N-glycosidase F (PNGase F). Endo H removes high-mannose type N-glycans, which are found on immature proteins in the ER, while PNGase F removes all types of N-linked glycans, including those found on proteins that have moved through the Golgi to the cell surface. Treatment with PNGase F caused CRUMBS2 from both Poglut1wsnp and wild-type samples to shift to the same size (Fig 4A), confirming that the difference in migration is due to differences in N-glycosylation. Endo H treatment increased the mobility of the CRUMBS2 protein from Poglut1wsnp embryoid bodies, suggesting this protein was modified with high mannose type N-glycans and was likely localized to the ER (Fig 4A). In contrast, Endo H had no effect on the majority of CRUMBS2 from wild-type embryoid bodies, demonstrating that this protein had moved through the Golgi to the surface. A smaller portion of the wild-type protein was sensitive to Endo H, suggesting that a small pool of the wild-type protein was in the ER. These data demonstrate that mutant protein was modified with Endo H-sensitive N-glycans, while the majority of the wild-type protein was modified with complex-type N-glycans sensitive to only PNGase F. The results strongly suggest that the CRUMBS2 protein in Poglut1wsnp mutants is localized to the ER and that O-glucosylation of EGF repeats is required for CRUMBS2 transport to the Golgi, where subsequent processing to complex type N-glycan structures occurs.
By immunostaining, CRUMBS2 was detected in the apical plasma membrane of the E8.5 wild-type neural plate and primitive streak (Fig 4B and 4C). In contrast, there was no detectable apical CRUMBS2 in the Poglut1wsnp neural epithelium or primitive streak (Fig 4D and 4E), consistent with the biochemical finding that Crumbs2 was trapped in the ER when it was not O-glycosylated by POGLUT1.
CRUMBS1 was localized to the Golgi in both wild type and Poglut1wsnp mutants at this stage (S4A and S4B Fig), which suggested that trafficking of these two Crumbs proteins is differentially regulated in this tissue and that CRUMBS2 is the relevant target of POGLUT1 in the early mouse embryo.
The gastrulation phenotypes of Poglut1wsnp and Crumbs2 are indistinguishable
To test whether the loss of cell-surface CRUMBS2 could account for the phenotype of Poglut1 mutant embryos, we compared the phenotypes of null alleles of the two genes using marker analyses. Like Poglut1 mutants, E8.5 Crumbs2 mutants have much less paraxial mesoderm, marked by expression of Meox1, than wild type (Fig 5A). Both Poglut1wsnp and Crumbs2 mutants had a discontinuous midline, as marked by expression of Brachyury in axial mesoderm (Fig 5B). Although cardiac mesoderm was specified in Crumbs2 and Poglut1 mutants, as assayed by Nkx2.5 expression, the E8.5 cardiac anlage was thinner and wider in the mutant than in wild type (Fig 5C) and the heart fields failed to fuse and form a single heart tube in both mutants. Despite these morphological similarities, the expression of a Notch target gene in the somites, Uncx4.1, appeared normal in the paraxial mesoderm of Crumbs2 mutants (S5 Fig), whereas it is not expressed in Poglut1wsnp embryos, confirming that the Notch pathway is blocked by the absence of POGLUT1 but not the absence of CRUMBS2.
The most prominent phenotype of both Poglut1wsnp and Crumbs2 mutants was the shortened body axis accompanied by a deficit of mesoderm. Mesoderm cells arise during gastrulation in an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) at the primitive streak, in which cells delaminate from the epithelial epiblast layer at the site of breakdown of the basement membrane, down-regulate E-cadherin, acquire mesenchymal characteristics and begin to migrate around the circumference of the embryo. The primitive streak regions of Poglut1wsnp and Crumbs2 mutants were comparable to wild-type at E7.5 (Fig 6A–6C). However, by E8.0 both the mutants had a broader streak than wild type, marked by the region of basement membrane breakdown at the streak (Fig 6D–6F). In both mutants, cells near the streak accumulated some ectopic laminin (Fig 6E’ and 6F’). In both Poglut1wsnp and Crumbs2-/- embryos, cells expressing E-cadherin accumulated at the primitive streak (Fig 6E” and 6F”), although some E-cadherin-negative cells were present in thin mesodermal wings (Fig 6E” and 6F”). The decreased number of mesoderm cells was apparent in laminin-stained transverse sections: in wild-type embryos, anterior head mesenchyme was present below the neural epithelium (Fig 6D) but there was very little anterior head mesenchyme present in both the mutants (asterisks in Fig 6E and 6F).
Discussion
Our data confirm previous findings in cultured cells and show that POGLUT1 is required for mouse NOTCH1 activity in vivo, as it is in Drosophila. As in Drosophila, POGLUT1 is required for the cleavage of NOTCH1 and activity of the Notch signaling pathway in vivo in the midgestation mouse embryo. The effects of POGLUT1 on Notch are apparent early in development: activated NOTCH1 accumulates in cells of the nascent mesoderm immediately after they exit the primitive streak, presumably setting the stage for segmentation of the presomitic mesoderm [47]. In contrast, our data indicate that the earlier developmental phenotype of Poglut1 mutants is caused by the loss of glucose modification of another EGF repeat-containing protein, the apical transmembrane protein CRUMBS2.
Notch extracellular domain is decorated with O-fucose, as well as O-glucose, and loss of mouse Pofut1 phenocopies Rbpjk mutants. CRUMBS2 and CRUMBS1 also have putative POFUT1 consensus sites (11 and 9 sites, respectively) [11, 26, 48]. The stronger phenotype of mouse Poglut1 than Pofut1 mutants suggests that the two types of O-glycosylation have distinct effects on the activities of CRUMBS proteins.
Previous studies that defined the activities of enzymes that glycosylate EGF repeats used short fragments of proteins that contained a few EGF repeats expressed in cell lines [13, 21, 24]. In the experiments presented here, we showed that full-length CRUMBS2 protein is modified by addition of a glucose-xylose-xylose trisaccharide to EGF repeat 6 in vivo. Although we assayed only a single repeat, we predict that most or all of the 8 EGF repeats of CRUMBS2 that include the consensus sequence for modification are likely to be O-glucosylated.
In the absence of O-glucose modification, CRUMBS2 is trapped in the ER and fails to accumulate at the apical membrane of cells in the mouse embryo. This is different from the effect of Poglut1 mutants on NOTCH: in both Drosophila Rumi mutants and mammalian Poglut1 knockdown cell lines, O-glucosylation is not required for cell surface localization or ligand binding of NOTCH; instead, O-glucosylation is required for the proper conformation of NOTCH to allow efficient cleavage by metalloproteases (S2 cleavage) and presenilin (S3 cleavage) to generate the active NICD transcription factor [13, 24]. As POGLUT1 localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum, the lack of cell surface localization of CRUMBS2 in Poglut1 mutants is likely to be due to a requirement for glycosylation of the EGF repeats of CRUMBS2 for its correct folding in the ER and subsequent trafficking to the Golgi and the cell surface. This hypothesis is supported by the accumulation of Endo H-sensitive forms of CRUMBS2 in Poglut1wsnp mutant embryoid bodies.
The EGF repeats in Drosophila Crumbs can also be modified by Rumi/POGLUT1 [43]. However, a mutant form of Drosophila Crumbs in which alanine replaced serine in all seven potential Rumi/POGLUT1 modification sites did not produce a mutant phenotype: homozygous S-to-A mutants were viable and appeared normal, and most of the mutant Crumbs protein localized normally to the membrane [43]. Thus glucose modification of CRUMBS2 is essential for its function in mammals but not in Drosophila. In Drosophila, Rumi mutants exhibit a Notch-dependent phenotype only when raised at higher temperatures [24, 43]. In contrast, POGLUT1-dependent modifications are essential for the activity of mammalian NOTCH. The more significant role of O-glucose addition in mammals may correlate with the more extensive POGLUT1-dependent modifications present on the mammalian proteins and may also reflect the higher body temperature of mammals. In all cases examined to date, O-glucose is extended to the trisaccharide form on all the EGF repeats of mammalian NOTCH [13, 21] and CRUMBS2 (this work). However, the predominant species of POGLUT1-modified EGF repeats in Drosophila Notch and Crumbs is glucose monosaccharide, which only occasionally is extended to the trisaccharide [24, 43].
POGLUT1-dependent modification of CRUMBS2 proteins is likely to be important in a variety of human diseases. Mutations in EGF repeats of human CRUMBS1, another likely substrate of POGLUT1, are found in retinitis pigmentosa and Leber congenital amaurosis [49–52], and could affect the glycosylation status of CRUMBS1 and its membrane localization in the eye. Mutations in human CRUMBS2 are associated with some cases of congenital nephrosis [53, 54], suggesting that POGLUT1 is also a candidate gene in this human syndrome. Whole exome sequencing has demonstrated that human POGLUT1 mutations are responsible for a subset of the cases of Dowling-Degos Disease, an autosomal dominant hyperpigmentation disorder [55]. POGLUT1 is overexpressed in several human leukemia, breast cancer and endometrial cancer cell lines [28, 56–58]. It has been suggested that POGLUT1 mutations disrupt the activation of Notch signaling pathway in these diseases; our results suggest that POGLUT1-dependent Crumbs activity should also be considered.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement
This work was approved by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center IACUC (protocol number 02-06-013) and studies were conducted in accordance to their guidelines.
Mouse strains
The wsnp allele was generated by ENU mutagenesis of C57/BL6J mice [33]. This allele harbors a T to C transition in the splice donor site of intron 3 of Poglut1, which creates an SfaNI restriction fragment length polymorphism. ES cells harboring the knock-out first allele were obtained from the International Mouse Knockout Project (HEPD0700_1_A09). They were injected into C57BL/6J blastocysts to generate chimeras, and chimeras were screened for transmission of gene trap allele (Poglut1gt), which introduces the LacZ coding gene downstream of Exon 3. The conditional allele (Poglut1flox) was generated by crossing Poglut1gt to actin-Flip mice [59]. The null allele (Poglut1Δ) was generated by crossing conditional allele to CAG-Cre [60]. The conditional allele of Crumbs2 [61] was crossed to CAG-Cre (Jax) to generate the null allele (Crumbs2-/-). Crumbs1rd8 [62] and Sox2-Cre [38] have been described. Mice carrying the nodal-lacZ knock-in allele [63] was a gift from Elizabeth Robertson and the TOPGAL mice [64] were provided by Elaine Fuchs.
Mapping and identification of wsnp
The wsnp mutation was mapped to a 407 kb interval between D16Mit90 and D16Mit12 simple sequence length polymorphism (SSLP) markers by meiotic recombination. Genomic DNA was purified from three mutants pooled together, and exonic DNA across the genomic interval was enriched using Agilent SureSelect solution based technology with custom target capture. Samples were multiplexed and bar-coded for SOLiD sequencing. Sequencing reads were aligned to the C57BL/6 reference genome using SHRiMP [65].
Phenotypic analysis
Whole mount in situ hybridization and LacZ staining was performed as published [36]. For in situ hybridization embryos were dissected in ice-cold PBS-0.4%BSA and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight. Following a series of dehydration and rehydration in methanol series, embryos were hybridized with the corresponding in situ probes, washed and developed using BM-purple. For β-galactosidase activity, embryos were dissected in ice cold PBS and fixed in freshly prepared fixative solution (5mM EGTA, 0.2% glutaraldehyde and 2mM MgCl2 in 0.1M phosphate buffer (pH 7.3)) for 10–15 minutes. Following washes in detergent rinse (2mM MgCl2, 0.02% Nonidet P-40 and 0.01% sodium deoxycholate in 0.1M phosphate buffer), the embryos were stained with X-GAL (1mg/ml X-GAL, 5 mM potassium ferricyanide) in detergent rinse) overnight. Following staining, the embryos were rinsed in PBS and fixed in 4%PFA for an hour before imaging.
Immunostaining
Embryos were dissected in ice cold PBS-BSA and fixed in 4% PFA for one hour at room temperature for immunostaining or over-night at 4°C for in-situ hybridization. The embryos were embedded in OCT (optimal cutting temperature) and cryosectioned at 10–12 μm thickness. Immunostaining on frozen sections was performed as published [36]. Primary antibodies were diluted in blocking buffer and incubated overnight at 4°C. The secondary antibodies were diluted in blocking buffer and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. DAPI was included in the secondary incubation.
For whole mount active NOTCH1 immunostaining, embryos were dissected in ice cold PBS-BSA and fixed overnight in 4% PFA/PBS at 4°C, dehydrated in methanol and stored at -20°C overnight. Following rehydration, antigen unmasking was performed in Vector unmasking solution (H-3300 Vector labs) at 98°C for 10 minutes. After reaching room temperature embryos were washed in MilliQ water and incubated in acetone at -20°C for 8 minutes. Next the embryos were washed and incubated in blocking buffer overnight at 4°C (Blocking buffer = 10% goat serum, 5% BSA, 0.3% Triton-X100 in PBS). The embryos were incubated in anti-cleaved NOTCH1 antibody (1:1000) for 2 days. Following 4–5 washes with blocking buffer, the embryos were incubated in secondary antibody overnight at 4°C. The embryos were washed extensively before mounting in glass-bottom dishes for confocal imaging.
The following antibodies were used: anti-CRUMBS1 and anti-CRUMBS2 were obtained from Jane McGlade (Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto) and were used at 1:100 and 1:50 respectively [66]; Anti-pan-CRUMBS was a kind gift from Ben Margolis (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor) and was used at 1:200 [67]. Commercially available antibodies used were: anti-SOX2 (Santa Cruz 1:100), anti-E-CADHERIN (Sigma 1:200), anti-LAMININ (Sigma 1:200) and anti-active NOTCH1 (Val 1744—Cell Signaling 1:1000). Confocal microscopy was performed using a Leica-Inverted SP5 or Leica-Upright SP5 laser, point-scanning confocal microscope. Confocal datasets were analyzed using the Volocity software package (Improvision).
Western blot analysis
Embryos were dissected in ice cold PBS and snap frozen on dry ice. The embryos were lysed in RIPA buffer with protease inhibitor added. The lysates were equilibrated on ice for 20 minutes, after which they were sonicated (3 X 30 seconds). Lysates were incubated for 10 minutes in ice and then centrifuged to remove the cell debris. The supernatant was mixed with 2X SDS loading dye (1:1) and loaded on an SDS-PAGE for analysis. The dilutions for primary antibody were: anti-pan-CRUMBS (Ben Margolis [64], 1:2000), anti-Cleaved-NOTCH1 (Val 1744—Cell Signaling 1:1000), anti-NOTCH1 (Abcam 1:1000) and anti-V5 (Invitrogen 1:5000).
Cloning of tagged CRUMBS2
The Crumbs2 cDNA was synthesized from wild-type embryos harvested at E8.5. Full-length Crumbs2 was cloned into the Gateway vector pDEST40 to generate Crumbs2 with His and V5 tags at its C-terminal. This sequence was sub-cloned with the tags into the EcoR1 site of the pCAGGS vector to generate pCAGGS-Crumbs2 for high expression in embryonic stem cells.
Generation of ES cell lines expressing full-length tagged CRUMBS2
ES cells were derived using the 2i protocol from both wild type and Poglut1wsnp blastocysts [44], were eventually weaned off iMEFs and were cultured in KnockOut DMEM (Gibco) supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum (HyClone), 2 mM L-glutamine (Gibco), 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol (Gibco), 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids (Gibco), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Gibco), 1% v/v penicillin and streptomycin (Gibco), 1,000 units LIF (Millipore), 1 μM PD0325901 and 3 μM CHIR99021 (Stemgent). To generate stable cells lines expressing tagged full-length CRUMBS2, wild-type and Poglut1wsnp ES cells were electroporated with pCAGGS-Crumbs2 DNA linearized by cutting with ScaI and a circular PGK-Puro-pA plasmid [68] that confers a transient puromycin resistance. Stable lines were selected with puromycin (Invitrogen) using published protocols [69]. Fifteen independent colonies were screened for expression of tagged full length CRUMBS2 both by immunofluorescence and western blots analysis with the anti-V5 antibody. One cell line each for wild type and Poglut1wsnp was selected based on high expression levels and was used for protein purification.
Embryoid body (EB) differentiation
ES cells were trypsinized and re-suspended at 106 ES cells per 10 ml media in non-adherent conditions (10 cm bacterial petri dishes (VWR) coated with Sigmacote). EBs were cultured in the absence of LIF and 2i in DMEM medium containing 15% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine (Gibco), 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol (Gibco), 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids (Gibco), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Gibco), 1% v/v penicillin and streptomycin (Gibco). The medium was replaced every day. To determine the time course of endogenous CRUMBS2 expression, EBs were harvested daily from day 1 to day 6.
Purification of CRUMBS2 protein
ES cells were cultured in large (6X15 cm) plates and differentiated to embryoid bodies. Wild-type and Poglut1wsnp mutant embryoid bodies were harvested 2 days after induction of differentiation from ES cells and snap frozen. These were re-suspended in RIPA buffer with 2% DDM (n-Dodecyl β-D-maltoside) and Roche protease inhibitor and subjected to three cycles of freeze-thaw to increase the release of membrane protein, then sonicated for 4 times for 30 seconds each and incubated at 4°C for one hour with continuous shaking. The lysates were clarified by centrifugation for 20 minutes at 15,520 g. The supernatant was incubated with anti-V5 antibody (1:1000) for 4 hours at 4°C shaking. This mixture was incubated with magnetic nickel beads (Invitrogen) for 2 hours at 4°C shaking. The beads were rinsed four times in RIPA lysis buffer, and the beads were heated to 95°C in 2XSDS loading buffer to elute the protein. The eluted protein was run on a 7% SDS-PAGE. The gel was washed 3 times in HPLC purified water and then stained with Pierce gel code blue stain reagent for 5–10 minutes. Following staining, the bands were cut out, subjected to chymotrypsin digest and used for mass spectrometric analysis.
Cleavage of N-glycans by PNGase F and Endo H
After 5 days of differentiation, wild-type and Poglut1wsnp EBs were lysed in sample buffer containing SDS and β-mercaptoethanol, and denatured by boiling for 5 min. After cooling, NP-40 was added and samples were diluted in PBS to final concentrations of 1% NP-40, <1%SDS and 1% β-mercaptoethanol. Samples were then incubated with 5U of Peptide-N-Glycosidase F (PNGase F), prepared as described [70] or 25mU of Endoglycosidase H (Endo H) (Roche) overnight at 37°C. Western blotting was performed to detect the removal of N-glycans from V5-tagged CRUMBS2 protein.
Mass spectrometric analysis
Bands containing purified mouse CRUMBS2-V5 were reduced, alkylated, and subjected to in-gel chymotryptic digest as described previously [45]. Peptides were analyzed by nanoLC-MS/MS as previously described [21]. Glycosylation of peptides was identified by using neutral loss searches, and Extracted Ion Chromatograms (EICs) were generated to compare relative amounts of each glycoform of the relevant peptides.
Supporting Information
Zdroje
1. Ishio A, Sasamura T, Ayukawa T, Kuroda J, Ishikawa HO, Aoyama N, Matsumoto K, Gushiken T, Okajima T, Yamakawa T, Matsuno K. O-fucose monosaccharide of Drosophila Notch has a temperature-sensitive function and cooperates with O-glucose glycan in Notch transport and Notch signaling activation. J Biol Chem. 2015 Jan 2;290(1):505–19. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.616847 Epub 2014 Nov 5. 25378397; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4281752.
2. Moremen KW, Molinari M. N-linked glycan recognition and processing: the molecular basis of endoplasmic reticulum quality control. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2006 Oct; 16(5): 592–9. Epub 2006 Aug 30. Review. 16938451; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3976202.
3. Imperiali B, Rickert KW. Conformational implications of asparagine-linked glycosylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jan 3; 92(1): 97–101. 7816856; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC42824.
4. Panin VM, Papayannopoulos V, Wilson R, Irvine KD. Fringe modulates Notch-ligand interactions. Nature. 1997 Jun 26; 387(6636): 908–12. 9202123.
5. Okajima T, Xu A, Irvine KD. Modulation of notch-ligand binding by protein O-fucosyltransferase 1 and fringe. J Biol Chem. 2003 Oct 24; 278(43): 42340–5. Epub 2003 Aug 8. 12909620.
6. Bruckner K, Perez L, Clausen H, Cohen S. Glycosyltransferase activity of Fringe modulates Notch-Delta interactions. Nature. 2000 Jul 27; 406(6794): 411–5. Erratum in: Nature 2000 Oct 5;407(6804):654. 10935637.
7. Okajima T, Reddy B, Matsuda T, Irvine KD. Contributions of chaperone and glycosyltransferase activities of O-fucosyltransferase 1 to Notch signaling. BMC Biol. 2008; 6:1. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-6-1 10.1186/1741-7007-6-1. 18194540; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2242781.
8. Schachter H, Freeze HH. Glycosylation diseases: quo vadis? Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 Sep; 1792(9):925–30. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2008.11.002 Epub 2008 Nov 13. Review. 19061954; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3927646.
9. Freeze HH. Understanding human glycosylation disorders: biochemistry leads the charge. J Biol Chem. 2013 Mar 8;288(10):6936–45. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R112.429274 Epub 2013 Jan 17. Review. 23329837; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3591604.
10. Freeze HH, Aebi M. Altered glycan structures: the molecular basis of congenital disorders of glycosylation. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2005 Oct; 15(5): 490–8. Review. 16154350.
11. Okamura Y, Saga Y. Pofut1 is required for the proper localization of the Notch receptor during mouse development. Mech Dev. 2008 Aug; 125(8): 663–73. doi: 10.1016/j.mod.2008.04.007 Epub 2008 May 4. 18547789.
12. Du J, Takeuchi H, Leonhard-Melief C, Shroyer KR, Dlugosz M, Haltiwanger RS, et al. O-fucosylation of thrombospondin type 1 repeats restricts epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and maintains epiblast pluripotency during mouse gastrulation. Dev Biol. 2010 Oct 1; 346(1): 25–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.07.008 Epub 2010 Jul 14. 20637190; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2937101.
13. Fernandez-Valdivia R, Takeuchi H, Samarghandi A, Lopez M, Leonardi J, Haltiwanger RS, et al. Regulation of mammalian Notch signaling and embryonic development by the protein O-glucosyltransferase Rumi. Development. 2011 May;138(10):1925–34. doi: 10.1242/dev.060020 Epub 2011 Apr 13. 21490058; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3082299.
14. Willer T, Prados B, Falcon-Perez JM, Renner-Muller I, Przemeck GK, Lommel M, et al. Targeted disruption of the Walker-Warburg syndrome gene Pomt1 in mouse results in embryonic lethality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Sep 28; 101(39): 14126–31. Epub 2004 Sep 21. 15383666; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC521095.
15. Garcia-Garcia MJ, Anderson KV. Essential role of glycosaminoglycans in Fgf signaling during mouse gastrulation. Cell. 2003 Sep 19; 114(6): 727–37. 14505572.
16. Stahl M, Uemura K, Ge C, Shi S, Tashima Y, Stanley P. Roles of Pofut1 and O-fucose in mammalian Notch signaling. J Biol Chem. 2008 May 16;283(20):13638–51. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802027200 Epub 2008 Mar 17. 18347015; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2376238.
17. Yao D, Huang Y, Huang X, Wang W, Yan Q, Wei L, Xin W, Gerson S, Stanley P, Lowe JB, Zhou L. Protein O-fucosyltransferase 1 (Pofut1) regulates lymphoid and myeloid homeostasis through modulation of Notch receptor ligand interactions. Blood. 2011 May 26;117(21):5652–62. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-12-326074 Epub 2011 Apr 4. 21464368; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3110024.
18. Wang W, Yu S, Zimmerman G, Wang Y, Myers J, Yu VW, Huang D, Huang X, Shim J, Huang Y, Xin W, Qiao P, Yan M, Xin W, Scadden DT, Stanley P, Lowe JB, Huang AY,Siebel CW, Zhou L. Notch Receptor-Ligand Engagement Maintains Hematopoietic Stem Cell Quiescence and Niche Retention. Stem Cells. 2015 Jul;33(7):2280–93. doi: 10.1002/stem.2031 Epub 2015 May 13. 25851125; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4478168.
19. Shao L, Moloney DJ, Haltiwanger R. Fringe modifies O-fucose on mouse Notch1 at epidermal growth factor-like repeats within the ligand-binding site and the Abruptex region. J Biol Chem. 2003 Mar 7; 278(10): 7775–82. Epub 2002 Dec 16. 12486116.
20. Alfaro JF, Gong CX, Monroe ME, Aldrich JT, Clauss TR, Purvine SO, et al. Tandem mass spectrometry identifies many mouse brain O-GlcNAcylated proteins including EGF domain-specific O-GlcNAc transferase targets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 8; 109(19): 7280–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200425109 Epub 2012 Apr 19. 22517741; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3358849.
21. Rana NA, Nita-Lazar A, Takeuchi H, Kakuda S, Luther KB, Haltiwanger RS. O-glucose trisaccharide is present at high but variable stoichiometry at multiple sites on mouse Notch1. J Biol Chem. 2011 Sep 9; 286(36): 31623–37. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.268243 Epub 2011 Jul 8. 21757702; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3173066.
22. Wang Y, Shao L, Shi S, Harris RJ, Spellman MW, Stanley P, et al. Modification of epidermal growth factor-like repeats with O-fucose. Molecular cloning and expression of a novel GDP-fucose protein O-fucosyltransferase. J Biol Chem. 2001 Oct 26; 276(43): 40338–45. Epub 2001 Aug 27. 11524432.
23. Sakaidani Y, Ichiyanagi N, Saito C, Nomura T, Ito M, Nishio Y, et al. O-linked-N-acetylglucosamine modification of mammalian Notch receptors by an atypical O-GlcNAc transferase Eogt1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012 Mar 2;419(1):14–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.01.098 Epub 2012 Jan 28. 22310717.
24. Acar M, Jafar-Nejad H, Takeuchi H, Rajan A, Ibrani D, Rana NA, et al. Rumi is a CAP10 domain glycosyltransferase that modifies Notch and is required for Notch signaling. Cell. 2008 Jan 25; 132(2): 247–58. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.016 18243100; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2275919.
25. Okajima T, Irvine KD. Regulation of notch signaling by O-linked fucose. Cell. 2002 Dec 13; 111(6): 893–904. 12526814.
26. Shi S, Stanley P. Protein O-fucosyltransferase 1 is an essential component of Notch signaling pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Apr 29;100(9):5234–9. Epub 2003 Apr 15. 12697902; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC154328.
27. Teng Y, Liu Q, Ma J, Liu F, Han Z, Wang Y, et al. Cloning, expression and characterization of a novel human CAP10-like gene hCLP46 from CD34(+) stem/progenitor cells. Gene. 2006 Apr 12; 371(1): 7–15. Epub 2006 Mar 9. 16524674.
28. Wang Y, Chang N, Zhang T, Liu H, Ma W, Chu Q, et al. Overexpression of human CAP10-like protein 46 KD in T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myelogenous leukemia. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2010 Feb; 14(1): 127–33. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2009.0145 20143914.
29. Takeuchi H, Fernandez-Valdivia RC, Caswell DS, Nita-Lazar A, Rana NA, Garner TP, et al. Rumi functions as both a protein O-glucosyltransferase and a protein O-xylosyltransferase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Oct 4;108(40):16600–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109696108 21949356
30. van de Pavert SA, Kantardzhieva A, Malysheva A, Meuleman J, Versteeg I, Levelt C, et al. Crumbs homologue 1 is required for maintenance of photoreceptor cell polarization and adhesion during light exposure. J Cell Sci. 2004 Aug 15; 117(Pt 18): 4169–77. 15316081.
31. Whiteman EL, Fan S, Harder JL, Walton KD, Liu CJ, Soofi A, et al. Crumbs3 is essential for proper epithelial development and viability. Mol Cell Biol. 2014 Jan; 34(1): 43–56. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00999-13 Epub 2013 Oct 28. 24164893; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3911272.
32. Xiao Z, Patrakka J, Nukui M, Chi L, Niu D, Betsholtz C, et al. Deficiency in Crumbs homolog 2 (Crb2) affects gastrulation and results in embryonic lethality in mice. Dev Dyn. 2011 Dec; 240(12): 2646–56. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22778 Erratum in: Dev Dyn. 2012 Feb;241(2):431. Pikkarainan, Timo [corrected to Pikkarainen, Timo]. 22072575.
33. Kasarskis A, Manova K, Anderson KV. A phenotype-based screen for embryonic lethal mutations in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jun 23;95(13):7485–90. 9636176; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC22659.
34. Gosens I, Sessa A, den Hollander AI, Letteboer SJ, Belloni V, Arends ML, et al. FERM protein EPB41L5 is a novel member of the mammalian CRB-MPP5 polarity complex. Exp Cell Res. 2007 Nov 15; 313(19): 3959–70. Epub 2007 Sep 7. 17920587.
35. Laprise P, Beronja S, Silva-Gagliardi NF, Pellikka M, Jensen AM, McGlade CJ, Tepass U. The FERM protein Yurt is a negative regulatory component of the Crumbs complex that controls epithelial polarity and apical membrane size. Dev Cell. 2006 Sep; 11(3): 363–74. 16950127; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2834949.
36. Lee JD, Silva-Gagliardi NF, Tepass U, McGlade CJ, Anderson KV. The FERM protein Epb4.1l5 is required for organization of the neural plate and for the epithelial-mesenchymal transition at the primitive streak of the mouse embryo. Development. 2007 Jun; 134(11): 2007–16. 17507402.
37. Garcia-Garcia MJ, Eggenschwiler JT, Caspary T, Alcorn HL, Wyler MR, Huangfu D, et al. Analysis of mouse embryonic patterning and morphogenesis by forward genetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Apr 26;102(17):5913–9. Epub 2005 Mar 8. 15755804; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1087930.
38. Hayashi S, Lewis P, Pevny L, McMahon AP. Efficient gene modulation in mouse epiblast using a Sox2Cre transgenic mouse strain. Mech Dev. 2002 Dec; 119 Suppl 1: S97–S101. 14516668.
39. Schroeter EH, Kisslinger JA, Kopan R. Notch-1 signalling requires ligand-induced proteolytic release of intracellular domain. Nature. 1998 May 28; 393(6683): 382–6. 9620803.
40. Del Monte G, Grego-Bessa J, González-Rajal A, Bolós V, De La Pompa JL. Monitoring Notch1 activity in development: evidence for a feedback regulatory loop. Dev Dyn. 2007 Sep;236(9):2594–614. 17685488.
41. Oka C, Nakano T, Wakeham A, de la Pompa JL, Mori C, Sakai T, et al. Disruption of the mouse RBP-J kappa gene results in early embryonic death. Development. 1995 Oct; 121(10): 3291–301. 7588063.
42. Donoviel DB, Hadjantonakis AK, Ikeda M, Zheng H, Hyslop PS, Bernstein A. Mice lacking both presenilin genes exhibit early embryonic patterning defects. Genes & development. 1999 Nov 1; 13(21): 2801–10. 10557208; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC317124.
43. Haltom AR, Lee TV, Harvey BM, Leonardi J, Chen YJ, Hong Y, et al. The protein O-glucosyltransferase Rumi modifies eyes shut to promote rhabdomere separation in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 2014 Nov;10(11):e1004795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004795 eCollection 2014 Nov. 25412384; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4238978.
44. Silva J, Barrandon O, Nichols J, Kawaguchi J, Theunissen TW, Smith A. Promotion of reprogramming to ground state pluripotency by signal inhibition. PLoS Biol. 2008 Oct 21;6(10):e253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060253 18942890; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2570424.
45. Kakuda S, Haltiwanger RS. Analyzing the posttranslational modification status of Notch using mass spectrometry. Methods Mol Biol. 2014; 1187: 209–21. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1139-4_16 25053492.
46. Harris RJ, Spellman MW. O-linked fucose and other post-translational modifications unique to EGF modules. Glycobiology. 1993 Jun; 3(3): 219–24. Review. 8358148.
47. Wahi K, Bochter MS, Cole SE. The many roles of Notch signaling during vertebrate somitogenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2014 Dec 4. pii: S1084-9521(14)00320-6. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.11.010 [Epub ahead of print] Review. 25483003.
48. Sigrist CJ, de Castro E, Cerutti L, Cuche BA, Hulo N, Bridge A, et al. New and continuing developments at PROSITE. Nucleic acids research. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D344–7. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1067 Epub 2012 Nov 17. 23161676; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3531220.
49. den Hollander AI, Davis J, van der Velde-Visser SD, Zonneveld MN, Pierrottet CO, Koenekoop RK, et al. CRB1 mutation spectrum in inherited retinal dystrophies. Hum Mutat. 2004 Nov; 24(5): 355–69. Review. 15459956.
50. Li S, Shen T, Xiao X, Guo X, Zhang Q. Detection of CRB1 mutations in families with retinal dystrophy through phenotype-oriented mutational screening. Int J Mol Med. 2014 Apr; 33(4): 913–8. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2014.1655 Epub 2014 Feb 12. 24535598.
51. Jalkh N, Guissart C, Chouery E, Yammine T, El Ali N, Farah HA, et al. Report of a novel mutation in CRB1 in a Lebanese family presenting retinal dystrophy. Ophthalmic Genet. 2014 Mar; 35(1): 57–62. doi: 10.3109/13816810.2013.763995 Epub 2013 Jan 30. 23362850.
52. van de Pavert SA, Meuleman J, Malysheva A, Aartsen WM, Versteeg I, Tonagel F, et al. A single amino acid substitution (Cys249Trp) in Crb1 causes retinal degeneration and deregulates expression of pituitary tumor transforming gene Pttg1. J Neurosci. 2007 Jan 17; 27(3): 564–73. 17234588.
53. Slavotinek A, Kaylor J, Pierce H, Cahr M, DeWard SJ, Schneidman-Duhovny D, et al. CRB2 mutations produce a phenotype resembling congenital nephrosis, Finnish type, with cerebral ventriculomegaly and raised alpha-fetoprotein. Am J Hum Genet. 2015 Jan 8; 96(1): 162–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.11.013 Epub 2014 Dec 31. 25557780; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4289687.
54. Ebarasi L, Ashraf S, Bierzynska A, Gee HY, McCarthy HJ, Lovric S, et al. Defects of CRB2 cause steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2015 Jan 8; 96(1): 153–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.11.014 Epub 2014 Dec 31. 25557779; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4289689.
55. Basmanav FB, Oprisoreanu AM, Pasternack SM, Thiele H, Fritz G, Wenzel J, et al. Mutations in POGLUT1, encoding protein O-glucosyltransferase 1, cause autosomal-dominant Dowling-Degos disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Jan 2; 94(1): 135–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.12.003 24387993; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3882728.
56. Chu Q, Liu L, Wang W. Overexpression of hCLP46 enhances Notch activation and regulates cell proliferation in a cell type-dependent manner. Cell Prolif. 2013 Jun; 46(3): 254–62. doi: 10.1111/cpr.12037 23692084.
57. Gao Y, Liu T, Huang Y. MicroRNA-134 suppresses endometrial cancer stem cells by targeting POGLUT1 and Notch pathway proteins. FEBS Lett. 2015 Jan 16; 589(2): 207–14. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.12.002 Epub 2014 Dec 17. 25528443.
58. Jin G, Cao Z, Sun X, Wang K, Huang T, Shen B. Protein O-glucosyltransferase 1 overexpression downregulates p16 in BT474 human breast cancer cells. Oncol Lett. 2014 Aug; 8(2): 594–600. Epub 2014 May 28. 25009645; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4081438.
59. Rodriguez CI, Buchholz F, Galloway J, Sequerra R, Kasper J, Ayala R, et al. High-efficiency deleter mice show that FLPe is an alternative to Cre-loxP. Nat Genet. 2000 Jun; 25(2): 139–40. 10835623.
60. Sakai K, Miyazaki J. A transgenic mouse line that retains Cre recombinase activity in mature oocytes irrespective of the cre transgene transmission. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997 Aug 18; 237(2): 318–24. 9268708.
61. Alves CH, Sanz AS, Park B, Pellissier LP, Tanimoto N, Beck SC, et al. Loss of CRB2 in the mouse retina mimics human retinitis pigmentosa due to mutations in the CRB1 gene. Hum Mol Genet. 2013 Jan 1; 22(1): 35–50. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds398 23001562
62. Mehalow AK, Kameya S, Smith RS, Hawes NL, Denegre JM, Young JA, et al. CRB1 is essential for external limiting membrane integrity and photoreceptor morphogenesis in the mammalian retina. Hum Mol Genet. 2003 Sep 1; 12(17): 2179–89. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds398 Epub 2012 Sep 21. 23001562.
63. Collignon J, Varlet I, Robertson EJ. Relationship between asymmetric nodal expression and the direction of embryonic turning. Nature. 1996 May 9; 381(6578): 155–8. 8610012.
64. DasGupta R, Fuchs E. Multiple roles for activated LEF/TCF transcription complexes during hair follicle development and differentiation. Development. 1999 Oct; 126(20): 4557–68. 10498690.
65. Rumble SM, Lacroute P, Dalca AV, Fiume M, Sidow A, Brudno M. SHRiMP: accurate mapping of short color-space reads. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 May; 5(5):e1000386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000386 Epub 2009 May 22. 19461883; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2678294.
66. Laprise P, Beronja S, Silva-Gagliardi NF, Pellikka M, Jensen AM, McGlade CJ, et al. The FERM protein Yurt is a negative regulatory component of the Crumbs complex that controls epithelial polarity and apical membrane size. Dev Cell. 2006 Sep; 11(3): 363–74. 16950127; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2834949.
67. Makarova O, Roh MH, Liu CJ, Laurinec S, Margolis B. Mammalian Crumbs3 is a small transmembrane protein linked to protein associated with Lin-7 (Pals1). Gene. 2003 Jan 2; 302(1–2): 21–9. 12527193.
68. Tucker KL, Beard C, Dausmann J, Jackson-Grusby L, Laird PW, Lei H, et al. Germ-line passage is required for establishment of methylation and expression patterns of imprinted but not of nonimprinted genes. Genes Dev. 1996 Apr 15; 10(8): 1008–20. 8608936.
69. Hadjantonakis AK, Gertsenstein M, Ikawa M, Okabe M, Nagy A. Generating green fluorescent mice by germline transmission of green fluorescent ES cells. Mech Dev. 1998 Aug; 76(1–2): 79–90. 9867352.
70. Kwan EM, Boraston AB, McLean BW, Kilburn DG, Warren RA. N-Glycosidase-carbohydrate-binding module fusion proteins as immobilized enzymes for protein deglycosylation. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2005 Oct; 18(10): 497–501. Epub 2005 Sep 9. 16155117.
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2015 Číslo 10
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Single Strand Annealing Plays a Major Role in RecA-Independent Recombination between Repeated Sequences in the Radioresistant Bacterium
- The Rise and Fall of an Evolutionary Innovation: Contrasting Strategies of Venom Evolution in Ancient and Young Animals
- Genome Wide Identification of SARS-CoV Susceptibility Loci Using the Collaborative Cross
- DCA1 Acts as a Transcriptional Co-activator of DST and Contributes to Drought and Salt Tolerance in Rice