Functional Divergence in the Role of N-Linked Glycosylation in Smoothened Signaling
N-linked glycosylation is a post-translational modification occurring on membrane proteins such as G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). Smoothened (Smo) is a GPCR that functions as the signal transducer of the Hedgehog (Hh) pathway. We used a mutagenesis approach to assess the role of N-glycans in Smo signaling in two genetic models for Hh pathway activity, Drosophila and mouse. In doing so, we discovered a divergence in glycan function between them. We mapped an essential N-glycan acceptor site that when lost in Drosophila, triggered ER retention, altered Smo protein stability and blunted its signaling capacity. Conversely, ER exit of the murine protein was unaffected by glycan loss, as was its ability to traffic and induce a G protein-independent signal to activate Hh target genes. However, the ability of vertebrate Smo to induce a distinct G protein-dependent signal was lost. This suggests that N-linked glycosylation may influence signal bias of vertebrate Smo to favor one signal output over the other. We therefore propose that the role of this conserved post-translational modification may have been repurposed from governing Smo ER exit in the fly to influencing effector route selection in vertebrates.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Functional Divergence in the Role of N-Linked Glycosylation in Smoothened Signaling. PLoS Genet 11(8): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005473
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005473
Souhrn
N-linked glycosylation is a post-translational modification occurring on membrane proteins such as G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). Smoothened (Smo) is a GPCR that functions as the signal transducer of the Hedgehog (Hh) pathway. We used a mutagenesis approach to assess the role of N-glycans in Smo signaling in two genetic models for Hh pathway activity, Drosophila and mouse. In doing so, we discovered a divergence in glycan function between them. We mapped an essential N-glycan acceptor site that when lost in Drosophila, triggered ER retention, altered Smo protein stability and blunted its signaling capacity. Conversely, ER exit of the murine protein was unaffected by glycan loss, as was its ability to traffic and induce a G protein-independent signal to activate Hh target genes. However, the ability of vertebrate Smo to induce a distinct G protein-dependent signal was lost. This suggests that N-linked glycosylation may influence signal bias of vertebrate Smo to favor one signal output over the other. We therefore propose that the role of this conserved post-translational modification may have been repurposed from governing Smo ER exit in the fly to influencing effector route selection in vertebrates.
Zdroje
1. Barakat MT, Humke EW, Scott MP (2011) Learning from Jekyll to control Hyde: Hedgehog signaling in development and cancer. Trends Mol Med 16: 337–348.
2. Briscoe J, Therond PP (2013) The mechanisms of Hedgehog signalling and its roles in development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14: 416–429. doi: 10.1038/nrm3598 23719536
3. Ingham PW, McMahon AP (2001) Hedgehog signaling in animal development: paradigms and principles. Genes Dev 15: 3059–3087. 11731473
4. Alcedo J, Ayzenzon M, Von Ohlen T, Noll M, Hooper JE (1996) The Drosophila smoothened gene encodes a seven-pass membrane protein, a putative receptor for the hedgehog signal. Cell 86: 221–232. 8706127
5. van den Heuvel M, Ingham PW (1996) smoothened encodes a receptor-like serpentine protein required for hedgehog signalling. Nature 382: 547–551. 8700230
6. Ogden SK, Fei DL, Schilling NS, Ahmed YF, Hwa J, et al. (2008) G protein Galphai functions immediately downstream of Smoothened in Hedgehog signalling. Nature 456: 967–970. doi: 10.1038/nature07459 18987629
7. Rohatgi R, Milenkovic L, Scott MP (2007) Patched1 regulates hedgehog signaling at the primary cilium. Science 317: 372–376. 17641202
8. Zhu AJ, Zheng L, Suyama K, Scott MP (2003) Altered localization of Drosophila Smoothened protein activates Hedgehog signal transduction. Genes Dev 17: 1240–1252. 12730121
9. Incardona JP, Gruenberg J, Roelink H (2002) Sonic hedgehog induces the segregation of patched and smoothened in endosomes. Curr Biol 12: 983–995. 12123571
10. Carroll CE, Marada S, Stewart DP, Ouyang JX, Ogden SK (2012) The extracellular loops of Smoothened play a regulatory role in control of Hedgehog pathway activation. Development 139: 612–621. doi: 10.1242/dev.075614 22223683
11. Denef N, Neubuser D, Perez L, Cohen SM (2000) Hedgehog induces opposite changes in turnover and subcellular localization of patched and smoothened. Cell 102: 521–531. 10966113
12. Taipale J, Cooper MK, Maiti T, Beachy PA (2002) Patched acts catalytically to suppress the activity of Smoothened. Nature 418: 892–897. 12192414
13. Mukhopadhyay S, Rohatgi R (2014) G-protein-coupled receptors, Hedgehog signaling and primary cilia. Semin Cell Dev Biol.
14. Taipale J, Chen JK, Cooper MK, Wang B, Mann RK, et al. (2000) Effects of oncogenic mutations in Smoothened and Patched can be reversed by cyclopamine. Nature 406: 1005–1009. 10984056
15. Nachtergaele S, Mydock LK, Krishnan K, Rammohan J, Schlesinger PH, et al. (2012) Oxysterols are allosteric activators of the oncoprotein Smoothened. Nat Chem Biol 8: 211–220. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.765 22231273
16. Marigo V, Davey RA, Zuo Y, Cunningham JM, Tabin CJ (1996) Biochemical evidence that patched is the Hedgehog receptor. Nature 384: 176–179. 8906794
17. Murone M, Rosenthal A, de Sauvage FJ (1999) Sonic hedgehog signaling by the patched-smoothened receptor complex. Curr Biol 9: 76–84. 10021362
18. Stone DM, Hynes M, Armanini M, Swanson TA, Gu Q, et al. (1996) The tumour-suppressor gene patched encodes a candidate receptor for Sonic hedgehog. Nature 384: 129–134. 8906787
19. Yao S, Lum L, Beachy P (2006) The ihog cell-surface proteins bind hedgehog and mediate pathway activation. Cell 125: 343–357. 16630821
20. Lu X, Liu S, Kornberg TB (2006) The C-terminal tail of the Hedgehog receptor Patched regulates both localization and turnover. Genes Dev 20: 2539–2551. 16980583
21. Von Ohlen T, Lessing D, Nusse R, Hooper JE (1997) Hedgehog signaling regulates transcription through cubitus interruptus, a sequence-specific DNA binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94: 2404–2409. 9122207
22. Ruiz i Altaba A (1999) Gli proteins encode context-dependent positive and negative functions: implications for development and disease. Development 126: 3205–3216. 10375510
23. Robbins DJ, Fei DL, Riobo NA (2012) The Hedgehog signal transduction network. Sci Signal 5: re6. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2002906 23074268
24. Polizio AH, Chinchilla P, Chen X, Kim S, Manning DR, et al. (2011) Heterotrimeric Gi proteins link Hedgehog signaling to activation of Rho small GTPases to promote fibroblast migration. J Biol Chem 286: 19589–19596. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.197111 21474452
25. Belgacem YH, Borodinsky LN (2011) Sonic hedgehog signaling is decoded by calcium spike activity in the developing spinal cord. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 4482–4487. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018217108 21368195
26. Violin JD, Lefkowitz RJ (2007) Beta-arrestin-biased ligands at seven-transmembrane receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci 28: 416–422. 17644195
27. Zhou L, Bohn LM (2014) Functional selectivity of GPCR signaling in animals. Curr Opin Cell Biol 27: 102–108. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2013.11.010 24680435
28. Strachan RT, Sun JP, Rominger DH, Violin JD, Ahn S, et al. (2014) Divergent Transducer-Specific Molecular Efficacies Generate Biased Agonism At A G Protein-Coupled Receptor (GPCR). J Biol Chem.
29. Rajagopal S, Bassoni DL, Campbell JJ, Gerard NP, Gerard C, et al. (2013) Biased agonism as a mechanism for differential signaling by chemokine receptors. J Biol Chem 288: 35039–35048. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.479113 24145037
30. Soto AG, Trejo J (2010) N-linked glycosylation of protease-activated receptor-1 second extracellular loop: a critical determinant for ligand-induced receptor activation and internalization. J Biol Chem 285: 18781–18793. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.111088 20368337
31. Lanctot PM, Leclerc PC, Clement M, Auger-Messier M, Escher E, et al. (2005) Importance of N-glycosylation positioning for cell-surface expression, targeting, affinity and quality control of the human AT1 receptor. Biochem J 390: 367–376. 15869468
32. He J, Xu J, Castleberry AM, Lau AG, Hall RA (2002) Glycosylation of beta(1)-adrenergic receptors regulates receptor surface expression and dimerization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 297: 565–572. 12270132
33. Wheatley M, Hawtin SR (1999) Glycosylation of G-protein-coupled receptors for hormones central to normal reproductive functioning: its occurrence and role. Hum Reprod Update 5: 356–364. 10465525
34. Tansky MF, Pothoulakis C, Leeman SE (2007) Functional consequences of alteration of N-linked glycosylation sites on the neurokinin 1 receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 10691–10696. 17563389
35. Rendie D, Wilson IB, Paschinger K (2008) The Glycosylation Capacity of Insect Cells. CROATICA CHEMICA ACTA 81: 7–21.
36. Marada S, Stewart DP, Bodeen WJ, Han YG, Ogden SK (2013) The unfolded protein response selectively targets active smoothened mutants. Mol Cell Biol 33: 2375–2387. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01445-12 23572559
37. Helenius A, Aebi M (2004) Roles of N-linked glycans in the endoplasmic reticulum. Annu Rev Biochem 73: 1019–1049. 15189166
38. Casso DJ, Tanda S, Biehs B, Martoglio B, Kornberg TB (2005) Drosophila signal peptide peptidase is an essential protease for larval development. Genetics 170: 139–148. 15716490
39. Torroja C, Gorfinkiel N, Guerrero I (2005) Mechanisms of Hedgehog gradient formation and interpretation. J Neurobiol 64: 334–356. 16041759
40. Maier D, Cheng S, Faubert D, Hipfner DR (2014) A Broadly Conserved G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase Phosphorylation Mechanism Controls Drosophila Smoothened Activity. PLoS Genet 10: e1004399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004399 25009998
41. McGinnes LW, Morrison TG (1997) Disulfide bond formation is a determinant of glycosylation site usage in the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase glycoprotein of Newcastle disease virus. J Virol 71: 3083–3089. 9060670
42. Wang C, Wu H, Katritch V, Han GW, Huang XP, et al. (2013) Structure of the human smoothened receptor bound to an antitumour agent. Nature 497: 338–343. doi: 10.1038/nature12167 23636324
43. Corbit KC, Aanstad P, Singla V, Norman AR, Stainier DY, et al. (2005) Vertebrate Smoothened functions at the primary cilium. Nature 437: 1018–1021. 16136078
44. Shi D, Lv X, Zhang Z, Yang X, Zhou Z, et al. (2013) Smoothened oligomerization/higher order clustering in lipid rafts is essential for high Hedgehog activity transduction. J Biol Chem 288: 12605–12614. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.399477 23532857
45. Zhao Y, Tong C, Jiang J (2007) Hedgehog regulates smoothened activity by inducing a conformational switch. Nature 450: 252–258. 17960137
46. Myers BR, Sever N, Chong YC, Kim J, Belani JD, et al. (2013) Hedgehog pathway modulation by multiple lipid binding sites on the smoothened effector of signal response. Dev Cell 26: 346–357. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.07.015 23954590
47. Rana R, Carroll CE, Lee HJ, Bao J, Marada S, et al. (2013) Structural insights into the role of the Smoothened cysteine-rich domain in Hedgehog signalling. Nat Commun 4: 2965. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3965 24351982
48. Nedelcu D, Liu J, Xu Y, Jao C, Salic A (2013) Oxysterol binding to the extracellular domain of Smoothened in Hedgehog signaling. Nat Chem Biol 9: 557–564. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1290 23831757
49. Nachtergaele S, Whalen DM, Mydock LK, Zhao Z, Malinauskas T, et al. (2013) Structure and function of the Smoothened extracellular domain in vertebrate Hedgehog signaling. Elife 2: e01340. doi: 10.7554/eLife.01340 24171105
50. Chen JK, Taipale J, Young KE, Maiti T, Beachy PA (2002) Small molecule modulation of Smoothened activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 14071–14076. 12391318
51. Kovacs JJ, Whalen EJ, Liu R, Xiao K, Kim J, et al. (2008) Beta-arrestin-mediated localization of smoothened to the primary cilium. Science 320: 1777–1781. doi: 10.1126/science.1157983 18497258
52. Wilbanks AM, Fralish GB, Kirby ML, Barak LS, Li YX, et al. (2004) Beta-arrestin 2 regulates zebrafish development through the hedgehog signaling pathway. Science 306: 2264–2267. 15618520
53. Sasaki H, Hui C, Nakafuku M, Kondoh H (1997) A binding site for Gli proteins is essential for HNF-3beta floor plate enhancer activity in transgenics and can respond to Shh in vitro. Development 124: 1313–1322. 9118802
54. Schroder R, Schmidt J, Blattermann S, Peters L, Janssen N, et al. (2011) Applying label-free dynamic mass redistribution technology to frame signaling of G protein-coupled receptors noninvasively in living cells. Nat Protoc 6: 1748–1760. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2011.386 22015845
55. Navarro G, Moreno E, Bonaventura J, Brugarolas M, Farre D, et al. (2013) Cocaine inhibits dopamine D2 receptor signaling via sigma-1-D2 receptor heteromers. PLoS One 8: e61245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061245 23637801
56. Shen F, Cheng L, Douglas AE, Riobo NA, Manning DR (2013) Smoothened is a fully competent activator of the heterotrimeric G protein G(i). Mol Pharmacol 83: 691–697. doi: 10.1124/mol.112.082511 23292797
57. Schroder R, Janssen N, Schmidt J, Kebig A, Merten N, et al. (2010) Deconvolution of complex G protein-coupled receptor signaling in live cells using dynamic mass redistribution measurements. Nat Biotechnol 28: 943–949. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1671 20711173
58. Riobo NA, Saucy B, Dilizio C, Manning DR (2006) Activation of heterotrimeric G proteins by Smoothened. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 12607–12612. 16885213
59. Chen JK, Taipale J, Cooper MK, Beachy PA (2002) Inhibition of Hedgehog signaling by direct binding of cyclopamine to Smoothened. Genes Dev 16: 2743–2748. 12414725
60. Teperino R, Aberger F, Esterbauer H, Riobo N, Pospisilik JA (2014) Canonical and non-canonical Hedgehog signalling and the control of metabolism. Semin Cell Dev Biol.
61. Petrescu AJ, Milac AL, Petrescu SM, Dwek RA, Wormald MR (2004) Statistical analysis of the protein environment of N-glycosylation sites: implications for occupancy, structure, and folding. Glycobiology 14: 103–114. 14514716
62. Nakano Y, Nystedt S, Shivdasani AA, Strutt H, Thomas C, et al. (2004) Functional domains and sub-cellular distribution of the Hedgehog transducing protein Smoothened in Drosophila. Mech Dev 121: 507–518. 15172682
63. Xia R, Jia H, Fan J, Liu Y, Jia J (2012) USP8 promotes smoothened signaling by preventing its ubiquitination and changing its subcellular localization. PLoS Biol 10: e1001238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001238 22253573
64. Li S, Chen Y, Shi Q, Yue T, Wang B, et al. (2012) Hedgehog-regulated ubiquitination controls smoothened trafficking and cell surface expression in Drosophila. PLoS Biol 10: e1001239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001239 22253574
65. Sivertsen B, Holliday N, Madsen AN, Holst B (2013) Functionally biased signalling properties of 7TM receptors—opportunities for drug development for the ghrelin receptor. Br J Pharmacol 170: 1349–1362. doi: 10.1111/bph.12361 24032557
66. Wang C, Wu H, Evron T, Vardy E, Han GW, et al. (2014) Structural basis for Smoothened receptor modulation and chemoresistance to anticancer drugs. Nat Commun 5: 4355. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5355 25008467
67. Soto AG, Smith TH, Chen B, Bhattacharya S, Cordova IC, et al. (2015) N-linked glycosylation of protease-activated receptor-1 at extracellular loop 2 regulates G-protein signaling bias. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
68. Landomiel F, Gallay N, Jegot G, Tranchant T, Durand G, et al. (2014) Biased signalling in follicle stimulating hormone action. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 382: 452–459. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2013.09.035 24121199
69. Arey BJ, Lopez FJ (2011) Are circulating gonadotropin isoforms naturally occurring biased agonists? Basic and therapeutic implications. Reviews in Endocrine & Metabolic Disorders 12: 275–288.
70. Rohatgi R, Milenkovic L, Corcoran RB, Scott MP (2009) Hedgehog signal transduction by Smoothened: pharmacologic evidence for a 2-step activation process. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 3196–3201. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813373106 19218434
71. Polizio AH, Chinchilla P, Chen X, Manning DR, Riobo NA (2011) Sonic Hedgehog activates the GTPases Rac1 and RhoA in a Gli-independent manner through coupling of smoothened to Gi proteins. Sci Signal 4: pt7. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2002396 22114142
72. Bischof J, Maeda RK, Hediger M, Karch F, Basler K (2007) An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific phiC31 integrases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 3312–3317. 17360644
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2015 Číslo 8
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Exon 7 Contributes to the Stable Localization of Xist RNA on the Inactive X-Chromosome
- YAP1 Exerts Its Transcriptional Control via TEAD-Mediated Activation of Enhancers
- SmD1 Modulates the miRNA Pathway Independently of Its Pre-mRNA Splicing Function
- Molecular Basis of Gene-Gene Interaction: Cyclic Cross-Regulation of Gene Expression and Post-GWAS Gene-Gene Interaction Involved in Atrial Fibrillation