Differential Management of the Replication Terminus Regions of the Two Chromosomes during Cell Division

English version České info

The genome of Vibrio cholerae is divided into two circular chromosomes, chrI and chrII. ChrII is derived from a horizontally acquired mega-plasmid, which raised questions on the necessary coordination of the processes that ensure its segregation with the cell division cycle. Here, we show that the MatP/matS macrodomain organization system impedes the separation of sister copies of the terminus region of chrI before the initiation of septum constriction. In its absence, however, chrI sister termini remain sufficiently close to mid-cell to be processed by the FtsK cell division translocase. In contrast, we show that MatP cannot impede the separation of chrII sister termini before constriction. However, it restricts their movements within the cell, which allows for their processing by FtsK at the time of cell division. These results suggest that multiple redundant factors, including MatP in the enterobacteriaceae and the Vibrios, ensure that sister copies of the terminus region of bacterial chromosomes remain sufficiently close to mid-cell to be processed by FtsK.

Vyšlo v časopise: Differential Management of the Replication Terminus Regions of the Two Chromosomes during Cell Division. PLoS Genet 10(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004557
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004557

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. EganES, FogelMA, WaldorMK (2005) Divided genomes: negotiating the cell cycle in prokaryotes with multiple chromosomes. Mol Microbiol 56: 1129–1138.

2. TrucksisM, MichalskiJ, DengYK, KaperJB (1998) The Vibrio cholerae genome contains two unique circular chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 14464–14469.

3. XuQ, DziejmanM, MekalanosJJ (2003) Determination of the transcriptome of Vibrio cholerae during intraintestinal growth and midexponential phase in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 1286–1291.

4. RosaPA, TillyK, StewartPE (2005) The burgeoning molecular genetics of the Lyme disease spirochaete. Nat Rev Microbiol 3: 129–143.

5. HoldenMT, TitballRW, PeacockSJ, Cerdeno-TarragaAM, AtkinsT, et al. (2004) Genomic plasticity of the causative agent of melioidosis, Burkholderia pseudomallei. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 14240–14245.

6. CasjensS (1998) The diverse and dynamic structure of bacterial genomes. Annu Rev Genet 32: 339–377.

7. ThompsonFL, IidaT, SwingsJ (2004) Biodiversity of vibrios. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68: 403–431 table of contents.

8. KonoN, ArakawaK, TomitaM (2011) Comprehensive prediction of chromosome dimer resolution sites in bacterial genomes. BMC Genomics 12: 19.

9. PossozC, JunierI, EspeliO (2012) Bacterial chromosome segregation. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 17: 1020–1034.

10. Vallet-GelyI, BoccardF (2013) Chromosomal organization and segregation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Genet 9: e1003492.

11. HarmsA, Treuner-LangeA, SchumacherD, Sogaard-AndersenL (2013) Tracking of Chromosome and Replisome Dynamics in Myxococcus xanthus Reveals a Novel Chromosome Arrangement. PLoS Genet 9: e1003802.

12. JoshiMC, BourniquelA, FisherJ, HoBT, MagnanD, et al. (2011) Escherichia coli sister chromosome separation includes an abrupt global transition with concomitant release of late-splitting intersister snaps. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 2765–2770.

13. StoufM, MeileJC, CornetF (2013) FtsK actively segregates sister chromosomes in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 11157–11162.

14. ThielA, ValensM, Vallet-GelyI, EspeliO, BoccardF (2012) Long-range chromosome organization in E. coli: a site-specific system isolates the Ter macrodomain. PLoS Genet 8: e1002672.

15. de BoerPA (2010) Advances in understanding E. coli cell fission. Curr Opin Microbiol 13: 730–737.

16. WuLJ, ErringtonJ (2004) Coordination of cell division and chromosome segregation by a nucleoid occlusion protein in Bacillus subtilis. Cell 117: 915–925.

17. EspeliO, BorneR, DupaigneP, ThielA, GigantE, et al. (2012) A MatP-divisome interaction coordinates chromosome segregation with cell division in E. coli. EMBO J 31: 3198–3211.

18. MercierR, PetitMA, SchbathS, RobinS, El KarouiM, et al. (2008) The MatP/matS site-specific system organizes the terminus region of the E. coli chromosome into a macrodomain. Cell 135: 475–485.

19. DubarryN, BarreFX (2010) Fully efficient chromosome dimer resolution in Escherichia coli cells lacking the integral membrane domain of FtsK. EMBO J 29: 597–605.

20. SalehOA, PeralsC, BarreFX, AllemandJF (2004) Fast, DNA-sequence independent translocation by FtsK in a single-molecule experiment. EMBO J 23: 2430–2439.

21. KennedySP, ChevalierF, BarreFX (2008) Delayed activation of Xer recombination at dif by FtsK during septum assembly in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 68: 1018–1028.

22. EspeliO, LeeC, MariansKJ (2003) A physical and functional interaction between Escherichia coli FtsK and topoisomerase IV. J Biol Chem 278: 44639–44644.

23. BigotS, MariansKJ (2010) DNA chirality-dependent stimulation of topoisomerase IV activity by the C-terminal AAA+ domain of FtsK. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 3031–3040.

24. LesterlinC, PagesC, DubarryN, DasguptaS, CornetF (2008) Asymmetry of chromosome Replichores renders the DNA translocase activity of FtsK essential for cell division and cell shape maintenance in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet 4: e1000288.

25. DubarryN, PossozC, BarreFX (2010) Multiple regions along the Escherichia coli FtsK protein are implicated in cell division. Mol Mic 78: 1088–1100.

26. ValM-E, KennedySP, El karouiM, BonnéL, ChevalierF, et al. (2008) FtsK-dependent dimer resolution on multiple chromosomes in the pathogen Vibrio cholerae. PLoS Genet 4: e1000201.

27. DavidA, DemarreG, MuresanL, PalyE, BarreFX, et al. (2014) The two Cis-acting sites, parS1 and oriC1, contribute to the longitudinal organisation of Vibrio cholerae chromosome I. PLoS Genet 10: e1004448.

28. RasmussenT, JensenRB, SkovgaardO (2007) The two chromosomes of Vibrio cholerae are initiated at different time points in the cell cycle. Embo J 26: 3124–3131.

29. YamaichiY, BrucknerR, RinggaardS, MollA, CameronDE, et al. (2012) A multidomain hub anchors the chromosome segregation and chemotactic machinery to the bacterial pole. Genes Dev 26: 2348–2360.

30. YamaichiY, FogelMA, WaldorMK (2007) par genes and the pathology of chromosome loss in Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 630–635.

31. BrezellecP, HoebekeM, HietMS, PasekS, FeratJL (2006) DomainSieve: a protein domain-based screen that led to the identification of dam-associated genes with potential link to DNA maintenance. Bioinformatics 22: 1935–1941.

32. SrivastavaP, FeketeRA, ChattorajDK (2006) Segregation of the replication terminus of the two Vibrio cholerae chromosomes. J Bacteriol 188: 1060–1070.

33. LesterlinC, GigantE, BoccardF, EspeliO (2012) Sister chromatid interactions in bacteria revealed by a site-specific recombination assay. EMBO J 31: 3468–3479.

34. DasB, BischerourJ, ValM-E, BarreFX (2010) Molecular keys of the tropism of integration of the cholera toxin phage. PNAS 107: 4377–4382.

35. GoleyED, YehYC, HongSH, FeroMJ, AbeliukE, et al. (2011) Assembly of the Caulobacter cell division machine. Mol Microbiol 80: 1680–1698.

36. PeralsK, CapiauxH, VincourtJB, LouarnJM, SherrattDJ, et al. (2001) Interplay between recombination, cell division and chromosome structure during chromosome dimer resolution in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 39: 904–913.

37. BarreFX, AroyoM, CollomsSD, HelfrichA, CornetF, et al. (2000) FtsK functions in the processing of a Holliday junction intermediate during bacterial chromosome segregation. Genes Dev 14: 2976–2988.

38. DupaigneP, TonthatNK, EspeliO, WhitfillT, BoccardF, et al. (2012) Molecular basis for a protein-mediated DNA-bridging mechanism that functions in condensation of the E. coli chromosome. Mol Cell 48: 560–571.

39. DemarreG, ChattorajDK (2010) DNA adenine methylation is required to replicate both Vibrio cholerae chromosomes once per cell cycle. PLoS Genet 6: e1000939.

40. SliusarenkoO, HeinritzJ, EmonetT, Jacobs-WagnerC (2011) High-throughput, subpixel precision analysis of bacterial morphogenesis and intracellular spatio-temporal dynamics. Mol Microbiol 80: 612–627.

41. MarvigRL, BlokeschM (2010) Natural transformation of Vibrio cholerae as a tool–optimizing the procedure. BMC Microbiol 10: 155.

42. RudolphCJ, UptonAL, StockumA, NieduszynskiCA, LloydRG (2013) Avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide. Nature 500: 608–611.