#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Out of Balance: R-loops in Human Disease


R-loops are cellular structures composed of an RNA/DNA hybrid, which is formed when the RNA hybridises to a complementary DNA strand and a displaced single-stranded DNA. R-loops have been detected in various organisms from bacteria to mammals and play crucial roles in regulating gene expression, DNA and histone modifications, immunoglobulin class switch recombination, DNA replication, and genome stability. Recent evidence suggests that R-loops are also involved in molecular mechanisms of neurological diseases and cancer. In addition, mutations in factors implicated in R-loop biology, such as RNase H and SETX (senataxin), lead to devastating human neurodegenerative disorders, highlighting the importance of correctly regulating the level of R-loops in human cells. In this review we summarise current advances in this field, with a particular focus on diseases associated with dysregulation of R-loop structures. We also discuss potential therapeutic approaches for such diseases and highlight future research directions.


Vyšlo v časopise: Out of Balance: R-loops in Human Disease. PLoS Genet 10(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004630
Kategorie: Review
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004630

Souhrn

R-loops are cellular structures composed of an RNA/DNA hybrid, which is formed when the RNA hybridises to a complementary DNA strand and a displaced single-stranded DNA. R-loops have been detected in various organisms from bacteria to mammals and play crucial roles in regulating gene expression, DNA and histone modifications, immunoglobulin class switch recombination, DNA replication, and genome stability. Recent evidence suggests that R-loops are also involved in molecular mechanisms of neurological diseases and cancer. In addition, mutations in factors implicated in R-loop biology, such as RNase H and SETX (senataxin), lead to devastating human neurodegenerative disorders, highlighting the importance of correctly regulating the level of R-loops in human cells. In this review we summarise current advances in this field, with a particular focus on diseases associated with dysregulation of R-loop structures. We also discuss potential therapeutic approaches for such diseases and highlight future research directions.


Zdroje

1. ThomasM, WhiteRL, DavisRW (1976) Hybridization of RNA to double-stranded DNA: formation of R-loops. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 73: 2294–2298.

2. WhiteRL, HognessDS (1977) R loop mapping of the 18S and 28S sequences in the long and short repeating units of Drosophila melanogaster rDNA. Cell 10: 177–192.

3. DroletM, BiX, LiuLF (1994) Hypernegative supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription elongation in vitro. J Biol Chem 269: 2068–2074.

4. AguileraA, Garcia-MuseT (2012) R loops: from transcription byproducts to threats to genome stability. Mol Cell 46: 115–124.

5. HamperlS, CimprichKA (2014) The contribution of co-transcriptional RNA∶DNA hybrid structures to DNA damage and genome instability. DNA Repair (Amst) 19: 84–94.

6. Skourti-StathakiK, ProudfootNJ (2014) A double-edged sword: R loops as threats to genome integrity and powerful regulators of gene expression. Genes Dev 28: 1384–1396.

7. WahbaL, GoreSK, KoshlandD (2013) The homologous recombination machinery modulates the formation of RNA-DNA hybrids and associated chromosome instability. Elife 2: e00505.

8. BoguslawskiSJ, SmithDE, MichalakMA, MickelsonKE, YehleCO, et al. (1986) Characterization of monoclonal antibody to DNA.RNA and its application to immunodetection of hybrids. J Immunol Methods 89: 123–130.

9. PhillipsDD, GarbocziDN, SinghK, HuZ, LepplaSH, et al. (2013) The sub-nanomolar binding of DNA-RNA hybrids by the single-chain Fv fragment of antibody S9.6. J Mol Recognit 26: 376–381.

10. HuZ, ZhangA, StorzG, GottesmanS, LepplaSH (2006) An antibody-based microarray assay for small RNA detection. Nucleic Acids Res 34: e52.

11. El HageA, FrenchSL, BeyerAL, TollerveyD (2010) Loss of Topoisomerase I leads to R-loop-mediated transcriptional blocks during ribosomal RNA synthesis. Genes Dev 24: 1546–1558.

12. MischoHE, Gomez-GonzalezB, GrzechnikP, RondonAG, WeiW, et al. (2011) Yeast Sen1 helicase protects the genome from transcription-associated instability. Mol Cell 41: 21–32.

13. SunQ, CsorbaT, Skourti-StathakiK, ProudfootNJ, DeanC (2013) R-loop stabilization represses antisense transcription at the Arabidopsis FLC locus. Science 340: 619–621.

14. BecherelOJ, YeoAJ, StellatiA, HengEY, LuffJ, et al. (2013) Senataxin plays an essential role with DNA damage response proteins in meiotic recombination and gene silencing. PLoS Genet 9: e1003435.

15. YeoAJ, BecherelOJ, LuffJE, CullenJK, WongsurawatT, et al. (2014) R-Loops in Proliferating Cells but Not in the Brain: Implications for AOA2 and Other Autosomal Recessive Ataxias. PLoS ONE 9: e90219.

16. Skourti-StathakiK, ProudfootNJ, GromakN (2011) Human senataxin resolves RNA/DNA hybrids formed at transcriptional pause sites to promote Xrn2-dependent termination. Mol Cell 42: 794–805.

17. GinnoPA, LimYW, LottPL, KorfI, ChedinF (2013) GC skew at the 5′ and 3′ ends of human genes links R-loop formation to epigenetic regulation and transcription termination. Genome Res 23: 1590–1600.

18. GinnoPA, LottPL, ChristensenHC, KorfI, ChedinF (2012) R-loop formation is a distinctive characteristic of unmethylated human CpG island promoters. Mol Cell 45: 814–825.

19. XuB, ClaytonDA (1996) RNA-DNA hybrid formation at the human mitochondrial heavy-strand origin ceases at replication start sites: an implication for RNA-DNA hybrids serving as primers. EMBO J 15: 3135–3143.

20. ItohT, TomizawaJ (1980) Formation of an RNA primer for initiation of replication of ColE1 DNA by ribonuclease H. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 77: 2450–2454.

21. YuK, ChedinF, HsiehCL, WilsonTE, LieberMR (2003) R-loops at immunoglobulin class switch regions in the chromosomes of stimulated B cells. Nat Immunol 4: 442–451.

22. ChanYA, AristizabalMJ, LuPY, LuoZ, HamzaA, et al. (2014) Genome-Wide Profiling of Yeast DNA∶RNA Hybrid Prone Sites with DRIP-Chip. PLoS Genet 10: e1004288.

23. TousC, AguileraA (2007) Impairment of transcription elongation by R-loops in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 360: 428–432.

24. HuertasP, AguileraA (2003) Cotranscriptionally formed DNA∶RNA hybrids mediate transcription elongation impairment and transcription-associated recombination. Mol Cell 12: 711–721.

25. NakamaM, KawakamiK, KajitaniT, UranoT, MurakamiY (2012) DNA-RNA hybrid formation mediates RNAi-directed heterochromatin formation. Genes Cells 17: 218–233.

26. Castellano-PozoM, Santos-PereiraJM, RondonAG, BarrosoS, AndujarE, et al. (2013) R loops are linked to histone H3 S10 phosphorylation and chromatin condensation. Mol Cell 52: 583–590.

27. YangY, McBrideKM, HensleyS, LuY, ChedinF, et al. (2014) Arginine methylation facilitates the recruitment of TOP3B to chromatin to prevent R loop accumulation. Mol Cell 53: 484–497.

28. Santos-PereiraJM, HerreroAB, Garcia-RubioML, MarinA, MorenoS, et al. (2013) The Npl3 hnRNP prevents R-loop-mediated transcription-replication conflicts and genome instability. Genes Dev 27: 2445–2458.

29. SordetO, RedonCE, Guirouilh-BarbatJ, SmithS, SolierS, et al. (2009) Ataxia telangiectasia mutated activation by transcription- and topoisomerase I-induced DNA double-strand breaks. EMBO Rep 10: 887–893.

30. LiX, ManleyJL (2005) Inactivation of the SR protein splicing factor ASF/SF2 results in genomic instability. Cell 122: 365–378.

31. StirlingPC, ChanYA, MinakerSW, AristizabalMJ, BarrettI, et al. (2012) R-loop-mediated genome instability in mRNA cleavage and polyadenylation mutants. Genes Dev 26: 163–175.

32. HelmrichA, BallarinoM, ToraL (2011) Collisions between replication and transcription complexes cause common fragile site instability at the longest human genes. Mol Cell 44: 966–977.

33. TuduriS, CrabbeL, ContiC, TourriereH, Holtgreve-GrezH, et al. (2009) Topoisomerase I suppresses genomic instability by preventing interference between replication and transcription. Nat Cell Biol 11: 1315–1324.

34. WahbaL, AmonJD, KoshlandD, Vuica-RossM (2011) RNase H and multiple RNA biogenesis factors cooperate to prevent RNA∶DNA hybrids from generating genome instability. Mol Cell 44: 978–988.

35. Herrera-MoyanoE, MerguiX, Garcia-RubioML, BarrosoS, AguileraA (2014) The yeast and human FACT chromatin-reorganizing complexes solve R-loop-mediated transcription-replication conflicts. Genes Dev 28: 735–748.

36. CerritelliSM, CrouchRJ (2009) Ribonuclease H: the enzymes in eukaryotes. FEBS J 276: 1494–1505.

37. BouleJB, ZakianVA (2007) The yeast Pif1p DNA helicase preferentially unwinds RNA DNA substrates. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 5809–5818.

38. ShinJH, KelmanZ (2006) The replicative helicases of bacteria, archaea, and eukarya can unwind RNA-DNA hybrid substrates. J Biol Chem 281: 26914–26921.

39. MoreiraMC, KlurS, WatanabeM, NemethAH, Le BerI, et al. (2004) Senataxin, the ortholog of a yeast RNA helicase, is mutant in ataxia-ocular apraxia 2. Nat Genet 36: 225–227.

40. AnheimM, MongaB, FleuryM, CharlesP, BarbotC, et al. (2009) Ataxia with oculomotor apraxia type 2: clinical, biological and genotype/phenotype correlation study of a cohort of 90 patients. Brain 132: 2688–2698.

41. ChenYZ, BennettCL, HuynhHM, BlairIP, PulsI, et al. (2004) DNA/RNA helicase gene mutations in a form of juvenile amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS4). Am J Hum Genet 74: 1128–1135.

42. SuraweeraA, LimY, WoodsR, BirrellGW, NasimT, et al. (2009) Functional role for senataxin, defective in ataxia oculomotor apraxia type 2, in transcriptional regulation. Hum Mol Genet 18: 3384–3396.

43. SteinmetzEJ, WarrenCL, KuehnerJN, PanbehiB, AnsariAZ, et al. (2006) Genome-wide distribution of yeast RNA polymerase II and its control by Sen1 helicase. Mol Cell 24: 735–746.

44. WestS, GromakN, ProudfootNJ (2004) Human 5′→3′ exonuclease Xrn2 promotes transcription termination at co-transcriptional cleavage sites. Nature 432: 522–525.

45. SuraweeraA, BecherelOJ, ChenP, RundleN, WoodsR, et al. (2007) Senataxin, defective in ataxia oculomotor apraxia type 2, is involved in the defense against oxidative DNA damage. J Cell Biol 177: 969–979.

46. YuceO, WestSC (2013) Senataxin, defective in the neurodegenerative disorder ataxia with oculomotor apraxia 2, lies at the interface of transcription and the DNA damage response. Mol Cell Biol 33: 406–417.

47. AlzuA, BermejoR, BegnisM, LuccaC, PicciniD, et al. (2012) Senataxin associates with replication forks to protect fork integrity across RNA-polymerase-II-transcribed genes. Cell 151: 835–846.

48. RichardP, FengS, ManleyJL (2013) A SUMO-dependent interaction between Senataxin and the exosome, disrupted in the neurodegenerative disease AOA2, targets the exosome to sites of transcription-induced DNA damage. Genes Dev 27: 2227–2232.

49. VantaggiatoC, BondioniS, AiroldiG, BozzatoA, BorsaniG, et al. (2011) Senataxin modulates neurite growth through fibroblast growth factor 8 signalling. Brain 134: 1808–1828.

50. PowellWT, CoulsonRL, GonzalesML, CraryFK, WongSS, et al. (2013) R-loop formation at Snord116 mediates topotecan inhibition of Ube3a-antisense and allele-specific chromatin decondensation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 13938–13943.

51. HelmrichA, BallarinoM, NudlerE, ToraL (2013) Transcription-replication encounters, consequences and genomic instability. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20: 412–418.

52. ChonH, SparksJL, RychlikM, NowotnyM, BurgersPM, et al. (2013) RNase H2 roles in genome integrity revealed by unlinking its activities. Nucleic Acids Res 41: 3130–3143.

53. CerritelliSM, FrolovaEG, FengC, GrinbergA, LovePE, et al. (2003) Failure to produce mitochondrial DNA results in embryonic lethality in Rnaseh1 null mice. Mol Cell 11: 807–815.

54. RydbergB, GameJ (2002) Excision of misincorporated ribonucleotides in DNA by RNase H (type 2) and FEN-1 in cell-free extracts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 16654–16659.

55. Nick McElhinnySA, KumarD, ClarkAB, WattDL, WattsBE, et al. (2010) Genome instability due to ribonucleotide incorporation into DNA. Nat Chem Biol 6: 774–781.

56. ReijnsMA, RabeB, RigbyRE, MillP, AstellKR, et al. (2012) Enzymatic removal of ribonucleotides from DNA is essential for mammalian genome integrity and development. Cell 149: 1008–1022.

57. LazzaroF, NovarinaD, AmaraF, WattDL, StoneJE, et al. (2012) RNase H and postreplication repair protect cells from ribonucleotides incorporated in DNA. Mol Cell 45: 99–110.

58. AranaME, KernsRT, WhareyL, GerrishKE, BushelPR, et al. (2012) Transcriptional responses to loss of RNase H2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 11: 933–941.

59. CrowYJ, LeitchA, HaywardBE, GarnerA, ParmarR, et al. (2006) Mutations in genes encoding ribonuclease H2 subunits cause Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome and mimic congenital viral brain infection. Nat Genet 38: 910–916.

60. CrowYJ, RehwinkelJ (2009) Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome and related phenotypes: linking nucleic acid metabolism with autoimmunity. Hum Mol Genet 18: R130–136.

61. CrowYJ, HaywardBE, ParmarR, RobinsP, LeitchA, et al. (2006) Mutations in the gene encoding the 3′-5′ DNA exonuclease TREX1 cause Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome at the AGS1 locus. Nat Genet 38: 917–920.

62. RiceGI, KasherPR, ForteGM, MannionNM, GreenwoodSM, et al. (2012) Mutations in ADAR1 cause Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome associated with a type I interferon signature. Nat Genet 44: 1243–1248.

63. RiceGI, BondJ, AsipuA, BrunetteRL, ManfieldIW, et al. (2009) Mutations involved in Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome implicate SAMHD1 as regulator of the innate immune response. Nat Genet 41: 829–832.

64. Lee-KirschMA, WolfC, GuntherC (2014) Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome: a model disease for systemic autoimmunity. Clin Exp Immunol 175: 17–24.

65. RabeB (2013) Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome: clues from the RNase H2 knock-out mouse. J Mol Med (Berl) 91: 1235–1240.

66. HillerB, AchleitnerM, GlageS, NaumannR, BehrendtR, et al. (2012) Mammalian RNase H2 removes ribonucleotides from DNA to maintain genome integrity. J Exp Med 209: 1419–1426.

67. BubeckD, ReijnsMA, GrahamSC, AstellKR, JonesEY, et al. (2011) PCNA directs type 2 RNase H activity on DNA replication and repair substrates. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 3652–3666.

68. RigbyRE, WebbLM, MackenzieKJ, LiY, LeitchA, et al. (2014) RNA∶DNA hybrids are a novel molecular pattern sensed by TLR9. EMBO J 33: 542–558.

69. Lopez CastelA, ClearyJD, PearsonCE (2010) Repeat instability as the basis for human diseases and as a potential target for therapy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 165–170.

70. GrabczykE, MancusoM, SammarcoMC (2007) A persistent RNA.DNA hybrid formed by transcription of the Friedreich ataxia triplet repeat in live bacteria, and by T7 RNAP in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 5351–5359.

71. LinY, DentSY, WilsonJH, WellsRD, NapieralaM (2010) R loops stimulate genetic instability of CTG.CAG repeats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 692–697.

72. McIvorEI, PolakU, NapieralaM (2010) New insights into repeat instability: role of RNA*DNA hybrids. RNA Biol 7: 551–558.

73. ReddyK, TamM, BowaterRP, BarberM, TomlinsonM, et al. (2011) Determinants of R-loop formation at convergent bidirectionally transcribed trinucleotide repeats. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 1749–1762.

74. BelotserkovskiiBP, MirkinSM, HanawaltPC (2013) DNA sequences that interfere with transcription: implications for genome function and stability. Chem Rev 113: 8620–8637.

75. GrohM, LufinoMM, Wade-MartinsR, GromakN (2014) R-loops associated with triplet repeat expansions promote gene silencing in Friedreich ataxia and fragile X syndrome. PLoS Genet 10: e1004318.

76. LoomisEW, SanzLA, ChedinF, HagermanPJ (2014) Transcription-Associated R-Loop Formation across the Human FMR1 CGG-Repeat Region. PLoS Genet 10: e1004294.

77. ColakD, ZaninovicN, CohenMS, RosenwaksZ, YangWY, et al. (2014) Promoter-bound trinucleotide repeat mRNA drives epigenetic silencing in fragile X syndrome. Science 343: 1002–1005.

78. HaeuslerAR, DonnellyCJ, PerizG, SimkoEA, ShawPG, et al. (2014) C9orf72 nucleotide repeat structures initiate molecular cascades of disease. Nature 507: 195–200.

79. HanahanD, WeinbergRA (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144: 646–674.

80. NegriniS, GorgoulisVG, HalazonetisTD (2010) Genomic instability–an evolving hallmark of cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 220–228.

81. ChernikovaSB, RazorenovaOV, HigginsJP, SishcBJ, NicolauM, et al. (2012) Deficiency in mammalian histone H2B ubiquitin ligase Bre1 (Rnf20/Rnf40) leads to replication stress and chromosomal instability. Cancer Res 72: 2111–2119.

82. BhatiaV, BarrosoSI, Garcia-RubioML, TuminiE, Herrera-MoyanoE, et al. (2014) BRCA2 prevents R-loop accumulation and associates with TREX-2 mRNA export factor PCID2. Nature 511: 362–365.

83. JacksonBR, NoerenbergM, WhitehouseA (2014) A novel mechanism inducing genome instability in Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus infected cells. PLoS Pathog 10: e1004098.

84. SikdarN, BanerjeeS, ZhangH, SmithS, MyungK (2008) Spt2p defines a new transcription-dependent gross chromosomal rearrangement pathway. PLoS Genet 4: e1000290.

85. San FilippoJ, SungP, KleinH (2008) Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu Rev Biochem 77: 229–257.

86. ChaudhuriJ, TianM, KhuongC, ChuaK, PinaudE, et al. (2003) Transcription-targeted DNA deamination by the AID antibody diversification enzyme. Nature 422: 726–730.

87. RobbianiDF, NussenzweigMC (2013) Chromosome translocation, B cell lymphoma, and activation-induced cytidine deaminase. Annu Rev Pathol 8: 79–103.

88. RuizJF, Gomez-GonzalezB, AguileraA (2011) AID induces double-strand breaks at immunoglobulin switch regions and c-MYC causing chromosomal translocations in yeast THO mutants. PLoS Genet 7: e1002009.

89. DuquetteML, PhamP, GoodmanMF, MaizelsN (2005) AID binds to transcription-induced structures in c-MYC that map to regions associated with translocation and hypermutation. Oncogene 24: 5791–5798.

90. BurnsMB, LackeyL, CarpenterMA, RathoreA, LandAM, et al. (2013) APOBEC3B is an enzymatic source of mutation in breast cancer. Nature 494: 366–370.

91. KulisM, EstellerM (2010) DNA methylation and cancer. Adv Genet 70: 27–56.

92. WongsurawatT, JenjaroenpunP, KwohCK, KuznetsovV (2011) Quantitative model of R-loop forming structures reveals a novel level of RNA-DNA interactome complexity. Nucleic Acids Res 40: e16.

93. HynesNE, StoelzleT (2009) Key signalling nodes in mammary gland development and cancer: Myc. Breast Cancer Res 11: 210.

94. BalkB, MaicherA, DeesM, KlermundJ, Luke-GlaserS, et al. (2013) Telomeric RNA-DNA hybrids affect telomere-length dynamics and senescence. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20: 1199–1205.

95. PfeifferV, CrittinJ, GrolimundL, LingnerJ (2013) The THO complex component Thp2 counteracts telomeric R-loops and telomere shortening. EMBO J 32: 2861–2871.

96. De AmicisA, PianeM, FerrariF, FanciulliM, DeliaD, et al. (2011) Role of senataxin in DNA damage and telomeric stability. DNA Repair (Amst) 10: 199–209.

97. WheelhouseRT, ChairesJB (2010) Drug binding to DNA×RNA hybrid structures. Methods Mol Biol 613: 55–70.

98. ShawNN, AryaDP (2008) Recognition of the unique structure of DNA∶RNA hybrids. Biochimie 90: 1026–1039.

99. ShawNN, XiH, AryaDP (2008) Molecular recognition of a DNA∶RNA hybrid: sub-nanomolar binding by a neomycin-methidium conjugate. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 18: 4142–4145.

100. CassidySB, DykensE, WilliamsCA (2000) Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes: sister imprinted disorders. Am J Med Genet 97: 136–146.

101. MengL, PersonRE, BeaudetAL (2012) Ube3a-ATS is an atypical RNA polymerase II transcript that represses the paternal expression of Ube3a. Hum Mol Genet 21: 3001–3012.

102. WhiteR, SaxtyB, LargeJ, KettleboroughCA, JacksonAP (2013) Identification of small-molecule inhibitors of the ribonuclease H2 enzyme. J Biomol Screen 18: 610–620.

103. SipovaH, ZhangS, DudleyAM, GalasD, WangK, et al. (2010) Surface plasmon resonance biosensor for rapid label-free detection of microribonucleic acid at subfemtomole level. Anal Chem 82: 10110–10115.

104. QaviAJ, KindtJT, GleesonMA, BaileyRC (2011) Anti-DNA∶RNA antibodies and silicon photonic microring resonators: increased sensitivity for multiplexed microRNA detection. Anal Chem 83: 5949–5956.

105. Gomez-GonzalezB, Garcia-RubioM, BermejoR, GaillardH, ShirahigeK, et al. (2011) Genome-wide function of THO/TREX in active genes prevents R-loop-dependent replication obstacles. EMBO J 30: 3106–3119.

Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicína

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Genetics


2014 Číslo 9
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
nový kurz
Autori: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#