Drosophila Mutants Model Cornelia de Lange Syndrome in Growth and Behavior
Cornelia de Lange Syndrome (CdLS) alters many aspects of growth and development. CdLS is caused by mutations in genes encoding proteins that ensure that chromosomes are distributed equally when a cell divides. These include genes that encode components of the cohesin complex, and Nipped-B-Like (NIPBL) that puts cohesin onto chromosomes. Individuals with CdLS have only modest reductions in the activities of these genes and do not show changes in chromosome distribution. Instead, they show differences in the expression many genes that control development. Animal models of CdLS will be useful for studies aimed at understanding how development is altered, and testing methods for treating CdLS. We find that Drosophila with one mutant copy of the Nipped-B gene, which is equivalent to the NIPBL gene, show characteristics similar to individuals with CdLS. These include reduced growth, learning, memory, and altered circadian rhythms. These studies thus indicate that Drosophila Nipped-B mutants are a valuable system for investigating the causes of the CdLS birth defects, and developing potential treatments. They also reveal that the slow growth in Drosophila Nipped-B mutants is not caused by disruption of systemic hormonal growth controls, and that the learning and memory deficits may reflect changes in brain structure.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Drosophila Mutants Model Cornelia de Lange Syndrome in Growth and Behavior. PLoS Genet 11(11): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005655
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005655
Souhrn
Cornelia de Lange Syndrome (CdLS) alters many aspects of growth and development. CdLS is caused by mutations in genes encoding proteins that ensure that chromosomes are distributed equally when a cell divides. These include genes that encode components of the cohesin complex, and Nipped-B-Like (NIPBL) that puts cohesin onto chromosomes. Individuals with CdLS have only modest reductions in the activities of these genes and do not show changes in chromosome distribution. Instead, they show differences in the expression many genes that control development. Animal models of CdLS will be useful for studies aimed at understanding how development is altered, and testing methods for treating CdLS. We find that Drosophila with one mutant copy of the Nipped-B gene, which is equivalent to the NIPBL gene, show characteristics similar to individuals with CdLS. These include reduced growth, learning, memory, and altered circadian rhythms. These studies thus indicate that Drosophila Nipped-B mutants are a valuable system for investigating the causes of the CdLS birth defects, and developing potential treatments. They also reveal that the slow growth in Drosophila Nipped-B mutants is not caused by disruption of systemic hormonal growth controls, and that the learning and memory deficits may reflect changes in brain structure.
Zdroje
1. Dorsett D, Merkenschlager M. Cohesin at active genes: a unifying theme for cohesin and gene expression from model organisms to humans. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2013; 25: 327–333. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2013.02.003 23465542
2. Remeseiro S, Cuadrado A, Losada A. Cohesin in development and disease. Development. 2013;140: 3715–3718. doi: 10.1242/dev.090605 23981654
3. Ball AR Jr, Chen YY, Yokomori K. Mechanisms of cohesin-mediated gene regulation and lessons learned from cohesinopathies. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1839: 191–202. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2013.11.002 24269489
4. Dorsett D, Kassis JA. Checks and balances between cohesin and Polycomb in gene silencing and transcription. Curr Biol. 2014;24: R535–R539. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.04.037 24892918
5. Rollins RA, Morcillo P, Dorsett D. Nipped-B, a Drosophila homologue of chromosomal adherins, participates in activation by remote enhancers in the cut and Ultrabithorax genes. Genetics. 1999;152: 577–593. 10353901
6. Rollins RA, Korom M, Aulner N, Martens A, Dorsett D. Drosophila nipped-B protein supports sister chromatid cohesion and opposes the stromalin/Scc3 cohesion factor to facilitate long-range activation of the cut gene. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24: 3100–3111. 15060134
7. Krantz ID, McCallum J, DeScipio C, Kaur M, Gillis LA, Yaeger D, et al. Cornelia de Lange syndrome is caused by mutations in NIPBL, the human homolog of Drosophila melanogaster Nipped-B. Nat Genet. 2004;36: 631–635. 15146186
8. Tonkin ET, Wang TJ, Lisgo S, Bamshad MJ, Strachan T. NIPBL, encoding a homolog of fungal Scc2-type sister chromatid cohesion proteins and fly Nipped-B, is mutated in Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Nat Genet. 2004;36: 636–641. 15146185
9. Dorsett D, Eissenberg JC, Misulovin Z, Martens A, Redding B, McKim K. Effects of sister chromatid cohesion proteins on cut gene expression during wing development in Drosophila. Development. 2005;132: 4743–4753. 16207752
10. Musio A, Selicorni A, Focarelli ML, Gervasini C, Milani D, Russo S, Vezzoni P, et al. X-linked Cornelia de Lange syndrome owing to SMC1L1 mutations. Nat Genet. 2006;38: 528–530. 16604071
11. Deardorff MA, Kaur M, Yaeger D, Rampuria A, Korolev S, Pie J, et al. Mutations in cohesin complex members SMC3 and SMC1A cause a mild variant of Cornelia de Lange syndrome with predominant mental retardation. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;80: 485–494. 17273969
12. Horsfield JA, Anagnostou SH, Hu JK, Cho KH, Geisler R, Lieschke G, et al. Cohesin-dependent regulation of Runx genes. Development. 2007;134: 2639–2649. 17567667
13. Zhang B, Jain S, Song H, Fu M, Heuckeroth RO, Erlich JM, et al. Mice lacking sister chromatid cohesion protein PDS5B exhibit developmental abnormalities reminiscent of Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Development. 2007;134: 3191–3201. 17652350
14. Kawauchi S, Calof AL, Santos R, Lopez-Burks ME, Young CM, Hoang MP, et al. Multiple organ system defects and transcriptional dysregulation in the Nipbl(+/-) mouse, a model of Cornelia de Lange Syndrome. PLoS Genet. 2009;5: e1000650. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000650 19763162
15. Liu J, Zhang Z, Bando M, Itoh T, Deardorff MA, Clark D, et al. Transcriptional dysregulation in NIPBL and cohesin mutant human cells. PLoS Biol. 2009;7: e1000119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000119 19468298
16. Liu J, Feldman R, Zhang Z, Deardorff MA, Haverfield EV, Kaur M, et al. SMC1A expression and mechanism of pathogenicity in probands with X-Linked Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Hum Mutat. 2009;30: 1535–1542. doi: 10.1002/humu.21095 19701948
17. Schaaf CA, Misulovin Z, Sahota G, Siddiqui AM, Schwartz YB, Kahn TG, et al. Regulation of the Drosophila Enhancer of split and invected-engrailed gene complexes by sister chromatid cohesion proteins. PLoS One. 2009;4: e6202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006202 19587787
18. Zhang B, Chang J, Fu M, Huang J, Kashyap R, Salavaggione E, et al. Dosage effects of cohesin regulatory factor PDS5 on mammalian development: implications for cohesinopathies. PLoS One. 2009;4: e5232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005232 19412548
19. Cunningham MD, Gause M, Cheng Y, Noyes A, Dorsett D, Kennison JA, et al. Wapl antagonizes cohesin binding and promotes Polycomb-group silencing in Drosophila. Development. 2012;139: 4172–4179. doi: 10.1242/dev.084566 23034634
20. Deardorff MA, Wilde JJ, Albrecht M, Dickinson E, Tennstedt S, Braunholz D, et al. RAD21 mutations cause a human cohesinopathy. Am J Hum Genet 90: 2012;1014–1027. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.04.019 22633399
21. Misulovin Z, Schwartz YB, Li XY, Kahn TG, Gause M, MacArthur S, et al. Association of cohesin and Nipped-B with transcriptionally active regions of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Chromosoma. 2008;117: 89–102. 17965872
22. Kagey MH, Newman JJ, Bilodeau S, Zhan Y, Orlando DA, van Berkum NL, et al. Mediator and cohesin connect gene expression and chromatin architecture. Nature. 2010;467: 430–435. doi: 10.1038/nature09380 20720539
23. Chien R, Zeng W, Kawauchi S, Bender MA, Santos R, Gregson HC, et al. Cohesin mediates chromatin interactions that regulate mammalian β-globin expression. J Biol Chem. 2011;286: 17870–17878. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.207365 21454523
24. Schaaf CA, Kwak H, Koenig A, Misulovin Z, Gohara DW, Watson A, et al. Genome-wide control of RNA polymerase II activity by cohesin. PLoS Genet. 2013;9: e1003382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003382 23555293
25. Fay A, Misulovin Z, Li J, Schaaf CA, Gause M, Gilmour DS, et al. Cohesin selectively binds and regulates genes with paused RNA polymerase. Curr Biol. 2011;21: 1624–1634. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.036 21962715
26. Dorsett D, Krantz ID. On the molecular etiology of Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1151: 22–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.03450.x 19154515
27. Liu J, Krantz ID. Cornelia de Lange syndrome, cohesin, and beyond. Clin Genet. 2009;76: 303–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01271.x 19793304
28. Deardorff MA, Bando M, Nakato R, Watrin E, Itoh T, Minamino M, et al. HDAC8 mutations in Cornelia de Lange syndrome affect the cohesin acetylation cycle. Nature. 2012;489: 313–317. doi: 10.1038/nature11316 22885700
29. Mannini L, Cucco F, Quarantotti V, Krantz ID, Musio A. Mutation spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlation in Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Human Mut. 2013;34: 1589–1596.
30. Kline AD, Krantz ID, Sommer A, Kliewer M, Jackson LG, FitzPatrick DR, et al. Cornelia de Lange syndrome: clinical review, diagnostic and scoring systems, and anticipatory guidance. Am J Med Genet A. 2007;143A: 1287–1296. 17508425
31. Kaiser FJ, Ansari M, Braunholz D, Concepción Gil-Rodríguez M, Decroos C, Wilde JJ, et al. Loss-of-function HDAC8 mutations cause a phenotypic spectrum of Cornelia de Lange syndrome-like features, ocular hypertelorism, large fontanelle and X-linked inheritance. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23: 2888–2900. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu002 24403048
32. Gillis LA, McCallum J, Kaur M, DeScipio C, Yaeger D, Mariani A, et al. NIPBL mutational analysis in 120 individuals with Cornelia de Lange syndrome and evaluation of genotype-phenotype correlations. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;75: 610–623. 15318302
33. Gause M, Webber HA, Misulovin Z, Haller G, Rollins RA, Eissenberg JC, et al. Functional links between Drosophila Nipped-B and cohesin in somatic and meiotic cells. Chromosoma. 2008;117: 51–66. 17909832
34. Hallson G, Syrzycka M, Beck SA, Kennison JA, Dorsett D, Page SL, et al. The Drosophila cohesin subunit Rad21 is a trithorax group (trxG) protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105: 12405–12410. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801698105 18713858
35. Schaaf CA, Misulovin Z, Gause M, Koenig A, Gohara DW, Watson A, et al. Cohesin and polycomb proteins functionally interact to control transcription at silenced and active genes. PLoS Genet. 2013;9: e1003560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003560 23818863
36. Seitan VC, Banks P, Laval S, Majid NA, Dorsett D, Rana A, et al. Metazoan Scc4 homologs link sister chromatid cohesion to cell and axon migration guidance. PLoS Biol. 2006;4: e242. 16802858
37. Rhodes JM, Bentley FK, Print CG, Dorsett D, Misulovin Z, Dickinson EJ, et al. Positive regulation of c-Myc by cohesin is direct, and evolutionarily conserved. Dev Biol. 2010;344: 637–649. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.05.493 20553708
38. Maines JZ, Stevens LM, Tong X, Stein D. Drosophila dMyc is required for ovary cell growth and endoreplication. Development. 2004;131: 775–786. 14724122
39. Teleman AA, Hietakangas V, Sayadian AC, Cohen SM. Nutritional control of protein biosynthetic capacity by insulin via Myc in Drosophila. Cell Metab. 2008;7: 21–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.11.010 18177722
40. Li L, Edgar BA, Grewal SS. Nutritional control of gene expression in Drosophila larvae via TOR, Myc and a novel cis-regulatory element. BMC Cell Biol. 2010;11: 7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-11-7 20089194
41. Zhang H, Stallock JP, Ng JC, Reinhard C, Neufeld TP. Regulation of cellular growth by the Drosophila target of rapamycin dTOR. Genes Dev. 2000;14: 2712–2724. 11069888
42. Gause M, Misulovin Z, Bilyeu A, Dorsett D. Dosage-sensitive regulation of cohesin chromosome binding and dynamics by Nipped-B, Pds5, and Wapl. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010;30: 4940–4951. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00642-10 20696838
43. Callier V, Nijhout HF. Body size determination in insects: a review and synthesis of size- and brain-dependent and independent mechanisms. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2013;88: 944–954. doi: 10.1111/brv.12033 23521745
44. Gallant P. Myc function in Drosophila. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2013;3: a014324. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a014324 24086064
45. de la Cova C, Abril M, Bellosta P, Gallant P, Johnston LA. Drosophila myc regulates organ size by inducing cell competition. Cell. 2004;117: 107–116. 15066286
46. Meyer N, Kim SS, Penn LZ. The Oscar-worthy role of Myc in apoptosis. Semin Cancer Biol. 2006;16: 275–287. 16945552
47. Montero L, Müller N, Gallant P. Induction of apoptosis by Drosophila Myc. Genesis. 2008;46: 104–111. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20373 18257071
48. Lovén J, Orlando DA, Sigova AA, Lin CY, Rahl PB, Burge CB, et al. Revisiting global gene expression analysis. Cell 2012;151:476–482. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.012 23101621
49. Rattray AM, Müller B. The control of histone gene expression. Biochem Soc Trans. 2012;40: 880–885. doi: 10.1042/BST20120065 22817752
50. Pauli A, Althoff F, Oliveira RA, Heidmann S, Schuldiner O, Lehner CF, et al. Cell-type-specific TEV protease cleavage reveals cohesin functions in Drosophila neurons. Dev Cell. 2008;14: 239–251. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.12.009 18267092
51. Schuldiner O, Berdnik D, Levy JM, Wu JS, Luginbuhl D, Gontang AC, et al. piggyBac-based mosaic screen identifies a postmitotic function for cohesin in regulating developmental axon pruning. Dev Cell. 2008;14: 227–238. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.11.001 18267091
52. McBride SM, Giuliani G, Choi C, Krause P, Correale D, Watson K, et al. Mushroom body ablation impairs short-term memory and long-term memory of courtship conditioning in Drosophila melanogaster. 1999;Neuron. 24: 967–977. 10624959
53. Pascual A, Préat T. Localization of long-term memory within the Drosophila mushroom body. Science. 2001;294: 1115–1117. 11691997
54. Krashes MJ, Keene AC, Leung B, Armstrong JD, Waddell S. Sequential use of mushroom body neuron subsets during drosophila odor memory processing. Neuron. 2007;53: 103–115. 17196534
55. Hall JC. The mating of a fly. Science. 1994;264: 1702–1714. 8209251
56. Sokolowski MB. Drosophila: genetics meets behaviour. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2: 879–890. 11715043
57. Siegel RW, Hall JC. Conditioned responses in courtship behavior of normal and mutant Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979;76: 3430–3434. 16592682
58. McBride SM, Choi CH, Wang Y, Liebelt D, Braunstein E, Ferreiro D, et al. Pharmacological rescue of synaptic plasticity, courtship behavior, and mushroom body defects in a Drosophila model of fragile X syndrome. Neuron. 2005;45: 753–764. 15748850
59. Ejima A, Griffith LC. Assay for courtship suppression in Drosophila. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2011;2011:pdb.prot5575.
60. Ryder E, Blows F, Ashburner M, Bautista-Llacer R, Coulson D, Drummond J, et al. The DrosDel collection: a set of P-element insertions for generating custom chromosomal aberrations in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2004;167: 797–813. 15238529
61. Lee T, Lee A, Luo L. Development of the Drosophila mushroom bodies: sequential generation of three distinct types of neurons from a neuroblast. Development. 1999;126: 4065–4076. 10457015
62. Gatto CL, Broadie K. Drosophila modeling of heritable neurodevelopmental disorders. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011;21: 834–841. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2011.04.009 21596554
63. Song J, Tanouye MA. From bench to drug: human seizure modeling using Drosophila. Prog Neurobiol. 2008;84: 182–191. 18063465
64. Sun L, Gilligan J, Staber C, Schutte RJ, Nguyen V, O'Dowd DK, et al. A knock-in model of human epilepsy in Drosophila reveals a novel cellular mechanism associated with heat-induced seizure. J Neurosci. 2012;32: 14145–14155. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2932-12.2012 23055484
65. Zhang C, Casas-Tintó S, Li G, Lin N, Chung M, Moreno E, et al. An intergenic regulatory region mediates Drosophila Myc-induced apoptosis and blocks tissue hyperplasia. Oncogene 2015;34: 2385–2397. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.160 24931167
66. Stavinoha RC, Kline AD, Levy HP, Kimball A, Mettel TL, Ishman SL. Characterization of sleep disturbance in Cornelia de Lange Syndrome. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;75: 215–218. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.11.003 21146878
67. Rajan R, Benke JR, Kline AD, Levy HP, Kimball A, Mettel TL, et al. Insomnia in Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;76: 972–975. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.03.008 22503448
68. Wirtz RA, Semey HG. The Drosophila kitchen—equipment, media preparation, and supplies. Drosophila Inform Serv. 1982;58: 176–180.
69. Homer N. TMAP: the torrent mapping program. 2011. https://github.com/iontorrent/TMAP/blob/master/doc/tmap-book.pdf
70. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009;25: 2078–2079.
71. Nicol JW, Helt GA, Blanchard SG Jr, Raja A, Loraine AE. The Integrated Genome Browser: free software for distribution and exploration of genome-scale datasets. Bioinformatics 2009;25: 2730–2731. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp472 19654113
72. Dorsett D. Distance-independent inactivation of an enhancer by the suppressor of Hairy-wing DNA-binding protein of Drosophila. Genetics. 1993;134: 1135–1144. 8375652
73. Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26: 841–842. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 20110278
74. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2015; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org
75. Schoenfeld BP, Choi RJ, Choi CH, Terlizzi AM, Hinchey P, Kollaros M, et al. The Drosophila DmGluRA is required for social interaction and memory. Front Pharmacol. 2013;4: 64. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2013.00064 23720628
76. Wu Y, Bolduc FV, Bell K, Tully T, Fang Y, Sehgal A, et al. A Drosophila model for Angelman syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105: 12399–12404. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805291105 18701717
77. Chen WF, Maguire S, Sowcik M, Luo W, Koh K, Sehgal A. A neuron-glia interaction involving GABA transaminase contributes to sleep loss in sleepless mutants. Mol Psychiatry. 2014; doi: 10.1038/mp.2014.11
78. Gilestro GF, Cirelli C. pySolo: a complete suite for sleep analysis in Drosophila. Bioinformatics. 2009;25: 1466–1467. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp237 19369499
79. Shi M, Yue Z, Kuryatov A, Lindstrom JM, Sehgal A. Identification of Redeye, a new sleep-regulating protein whose expression is modulated by sleep amount. Elife 2014; doi: 10.7554/eLife.01473
80. Zhang H, Tan J, Reynolds E, Kuebler D, Faulhaber S, Tanouye M. The Drosophila slamdance gene: a mutation in an aminopeptidase can cause seizure, paralysis and neuronal failure. Genetics. 2002;162: 1283–1299. 12454073
81. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources. Nature Protoc. 2009;4: 44–57.
82. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Bioinformatic enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37: 1–13. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn923 19033363
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2015 Číslo 11
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- UFBP1, a Key Component of the Ufm1 Conjugation System, Is Essential for Ufmylation-Mediated Regulation of Erythroid Development
- Metabolomic Quantitative Trait Loci (mQTL) Mapping Implicates the Ubiquitin Proteasome System in Cardiovascular Disease Pathogenesis
- Ernst Rüdin’s Unpublished 1922-1925 Study “Inheritance of Manic-Depressive Insanity”: Genetic Research Findings Subordinated to Eugenic Ideology
- Genetic Interactions Implicating Postreplicative Repair in Okazaki Fragment Processing