#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) Reveals a Neo-X Chromosome and Biased Gene Movement in Stalk-Eyed Flies (Genus )


Chromosomal location has a significant effect on the evolutionary dynamics of genes involved in sexual dimorphism, impacting both the pattern of sex-specific gene expression and the rate of duplication and protein evolution for these genes. For nearly all non-model organisms, however, knowledge of chromosomal gene content is minimal and difficult to obtain on a genomic scale. In this study, we utilized Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH), using probes designed from EST sequence, to identify genes located on the X chromosome of four species in the stalk-eyed fly genus Teleopsis. Analysis of log2 ratio values of female-to-male hybridization intensities from the CGH microarrays for over 3,400 genes reveals a strongly bimodal distribution that clearly differentiates autosomal from X-linked genes for all four species. Genotyping of 33 and linkage mapping of 28 of these genes in Teleopsis dalmanni indicate the CGH results correctly identified chromosomal location in all cases. Syntenic comparison with Drosophila indicates that 90% of the X-linked genes in Teleopsis are homologous to genes located on chromosome 2L in Drosophila melanogaster, suggesting the formation of a nearly complete neo-X chromosome from Muller element B in the dipteran lineage leading to Teleopsis. Analysis of gene movement both relative to Drosophila and within Teleopsis indicates that gene movement is significantly associated with 1) rates of protein evolution, 2) the pattern of gene duplication, and 3) the evolution of eyespan sexual dimorphism. Overall, this study reveals that diopsids are a critical group for understanding the evolution of sex chromosomes within Diptera. In addition, we demonstrate that CGH is a useful technique for identifying chromosomal sex-linkage and should be applicable to other organisms with EST or partial genomic information.


Vyšlo v časopise: Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) Reveals a Neo-X Chromosome and Biased Gene Movement in Stalk-Eyed Flies (Genus ). PLoS Genet 6(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001121
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001121

Souhrn

Chromosomal location has a significant effect on the evolutionary dynamics of genes involved in sexual dimorphism, impacting both the pattern of sex-specific gene expression and the rate of duplication and protein evolution for these genes. For nearly all non-model organisms, however, knowledge of chromosomal gene content is minimal and difficult to obtain on a genomic scale. In this study, we utilized Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH), using probes designed from EST sequence, to identify genes located on the X chromosome of four species in the stalk-eyed fly genus Teleopsis. Analysis of log2 ratio values of female-to-male hybridization intensities from the CGH microarrays for over 3,400 genes reveals a strongly bimodal distribution that clearly differentiates autosomal from X-linked genes for all four species. Genotyping of 33 and linkage mapping of 28 of these genes in Teleopsis dalmanni indicate the CGH results correctly identified chromosomal location in all cases. Syntenic comparison with Drosophila indicates that 90% of the X-linked genes in Teleopsis are homologous to genes located on chromosome 2L in Drosophila melanogaster, suggesting the formation of a nearly complete neo-X chromosome from Muller element B in the dipteran lineage leading to Teleopsis. Analysis of gene movement both relative to Drosophila and within Teleopsis indicates that gene movement is significantly associated with 1) rates of protein evolution, 2) the pattern of gene duplication, and 3) the evolution of eyespan sexual dimorphism. Overall, this study reveals that diopsids are a critical group for understanding the evolution of sex chromosomes within Diptera. In addition, we demonstrate that CGH is a useful technique for identifying chromosomal sex-linkage and should be applicable to other organisms with EST or partial genomic information.


Zdroje

1. FisherRA

1931 The evolution of dominance. Biol Rev 6 345 368

2. MullerHJ

1932 Some genetic aspects of sex. Am Nat 66 118 138

3. BullJJ

1983 Evolution of Sex Determining Mechanisms. Menlo Park Benjamin Cummings

4. VicosoB

CharlesworthB

2006 Evolution on the X chromosome: unusual patterns and processes. Nat Rev Genet 7 645 653

5. WhiteMJD

1973 Animal Cytology and Evolution. Cambridge Cambridge University Press

6. BhutkarA

RussoSM

SmithTF

GelbartWM

2007 Genome-scale analysis of positionally relocated genes. Genome Res 17 1880 1887

7. KohnM

Kehrer-SawatzkiH

VogelW

GravesJAM

HameisterH

2004 Wide genome comparisons reveal the origins of the human X chromosome. Trends Genet 20 598 603

8. McLysaghtA

2008 Evolutionary steps of sex chromosomes are reflected in retrogenes. Trends Genet 24 478 481

9. MeiselRP

HanMV

HahnMW

2009 A complex suite of forces drives gene traffic from Drosophila X chromosomes. Genome Biol Evol 1 176 188

10. PotrzebowskiL

VinckenboschN

MarquesAC

ChalmelF

JegouB

2008 Chromosomal gene movements reflect the recent origin and biology of therian sex chromosomes. PLoS Biol 6 709 716 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060080

11. SchaefferSW

BhutkarAU

McAllisterBF

MatsudaM

MatzkinLM

2008 Polytene chromosomal maps of 11 Drosophila species: The order of genomic scaffolds inferred from genetic and physical maps. Genetics 179 1601 1655

12. WaterhouseRM

WyderS

ZdobnovEM

2008 The Aedes aegypti genome: a comparative perspective. Insect Mol Biol 17 1 8

13. CharlesworthB

1978 Model for evolution of Y-chromosomes and dosage compensation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75 5618 5622

14. CharlesworthB

1991 The evolution of sex chromosomes. Science 251 1030 1033

15. RiceWR

1984 Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38 735 742

16. RiceWR

1987 Genetic hitchhiking and the evolution of reduced genetic activity of the Y sex chromosome. Genetics 116 161 167

17. RiceWR

1996 Evolution of the Y sex chromosome in animals. Bioscience 46 331 343

18. ZhangY

OliverB

2007 Dosage compensation goes global. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17 113 120

19. StraubT

BeckerPB

2007 Dosage compensation: the beginning and end of generalization. Nat Rev Genet 8 47 57

20. CharlesworthB

CoyneJA

BartonNH

1987 The relative rates of evolution of sex chromosomes and autosomes. Am Nat 130 113 146

21. JinW

RileyRM

WolfingerRD

WhiteKP

Passador-GurgelG

2001 The contributions of sex, genotype and age to transcriptional variance in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Genet 29 389 395

22. RanzJM

Castillo-DavisCI

MeiklejohnCD

HartlDL

2003 Sex-dependent gene expression and evolution of the Drosophila transcriptome. Science 300 1742 1745

23. EllegrenH

ParschJ

2007 The evolution of sex-biased genes and sex-biased gene expression. Nat Rev Genet 8 689 698

24. ParisiM

NuttallR

NaimanD

BouffardG

MalleyJ

2003 Paucity of genes on the Drosophila X chromosome showing male-biased expression. Science 299 697 700

25. SturgillD

ZhangY

ParisiM

OliverB

2007 Demasculinization of X chromosomes in the Drosophila genus. Nature 450 238 U233

26. LifschytzE

LindsleyDL

1972 The role of X-chromosome inactivation during spermatogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69 182 186

27. HenseW

BainesJF

ParschJ

2007 X chromosome inactivation during Drosophila spermatogenesis. PLoS Biol 5 2288 2295 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050273

28. WuCI

XuEY

2003 Sexual antagonism and X inactivation - the SAXI hypothesis. Trends Genet 19 243 247

29. TurnerJM

2007 Meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. Development 134 1823 1831

30. BetranE

ThorntonK

LongM

2002 Retroposed new genes out of the X in Drosophila. Genome Res 12 1854 1859

31. VibranovskiMD

ZhangY

LongMY

2009 General gene movement off the X chromosome in the Drosophila genus. Genome Res 19 897 903

32. KhilPP

SmirnovaNA

RomanienkoPJ

Camerini-OteroRD

2004 The mouse X chromosome is enriched for sex-biased genes not subject to selection by meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. Nat Genet 36 642 646

33. WilkinsonGS

DodsonG

1997 Function and evolution of antlers and eye stalks in flies.

ChoeJ

CrespiB

The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids Cambridge Cambridge University Press 310 328

34. BakerRH

WilkinsonGS

2001 Phylogenetic analysis of eye stalk allometry and sexual dimorphism in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Evolution 55 1373 1385

35. PanhuisTM

WilkinsonGS

1999 Exaggerated male eye span influences contest outcome in stalk-eyed flies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46 221 227

36. HingleA

FowlerK

PomiankowskiA

2001 Size-dependent mate preference in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Anim Behav 61 589 595

37. WilkinsonGS

KahlerH

BakerRH

1998 Evolution of female mating preferences in stalk-eyed flies. Behav Ecol 9 525 533

38. WilkinsonGS

ReilloPR

1994 Female preference response to artificial selection on an exaggerated male trait in a stalk-eyed fly. Proc R Soc Lond B 255 1 6

39. WolfenbargerLL

WilkinsonGS

2001 Sex-linked expression of a sexually selected trait in the stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Evolution 55 103 110

40. JohnsPM

WolfenbargerLL

WilkinsonGS

2005 Genetic linkage between a sexually selected trait and X chromosome meiotic drive. Proc R Soc Lond B 272 2097 2103

41. JohnsPM

WilkinsonGS

2007 X chromosome influences sperm length in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Heredity 99 56 61

42. WilkinsonGS

AmitinEG

JohnsPM

2005 Sex-linked correlated responses in female reproductive traits to selection on male eye span in stalk-eyed flies. Int Comp Biol 45 500 510

43. MeierR

BakerR

2002 A cladistic analysis of Diopsidae (Diptera) based on morphological and DNA sequence data. Insect Syst Evol 33 325 336

44. PresgravesDC

SeverenceE

WilkinsonGS

1997 Sex chromosome meiotic drive in stalk-eyed flies. Genetics 147 1169 1180

45. WilkinsonGS

SwallowJG

ChristiansonSJ

MaddenK

2003 Phylogeography of sex ratio and multiple mating in stalk-eyed flies from southeast Asia. Genetica 117 37 46

46. WilkinsonGS

PresgravesDC

CrymesL

1998 Male eye span in stalk-eyed flies indicates genetic quality by meiotic drive suppression. Nature 391 276 278

47. BarrettMT

SchefferA

Ben-DorA

SampasN

LipsonD

2004 Comparative genomic hybridization using oligonucleotide microarrays and total genomic DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101 17765 17770

48. StankiewiczP

BeaudetAL

2007 Use of array CGH in the evaluation of dysmorphology, malformations, developmental delay, and idiopathic mental retardation. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17 182 192

49. ZhangF

GuW

HurlesME

LupskiJR

2009 Copy number variation in human health, disease, and evolution. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 10 451 481

50. BakerRH

MorganJ

WangX

BooreJL

WilkinsonGS

2009 Genomic analysis of a sexually-selected character: EST sequencing and microarray analysis of eye-antennal imaginal discs in the stalk-eyed fly Teleopsis dalmanni (Diopsidae). BMC Genomics 10 1 20

51. BainesJF

SawyerSA

HartlDL

ParschJ

2008 Effects of X-linkage and sex-biased gene expression on the rate of adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol 25 1639 1650

52. BachtrogD

JensenJD

ZhangZ

2009 Accelerated adaptive evolution on a newly formed X chromosome. PLoS Biol 7 e1000082 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000082

53. BachtrogD

2008 The temporal dynamics of processes underlying Y chromosome degeneration. Genetics 179 1513 1525

54. BachtrogD

HomE

WongKM

MasideX

de JongP

2008 Genomic degradation of a young Y chromosome in Drosophila miranda. Genome Biol 9 R30

55. CarvalhoAB

ClarkAG

2005 Y chromosome of D. pseudoobscura is not homologous to the ancestral Drosophila Y. Science 307 108 110

56. CarvalhoAB

KoerichLB

ClarkAG

2009 Origin and evolution of Y chromosomes: Drosophila tales. Trends Genet 25 270 277

57. KoerichLB

WangXY

ClarkAG

CarvalhoAB

2008 Low conservation of gene content in the Drosophila Y chromosome. Nature 456 949 951

58. MikhaylovaLM

NguyenK

NurminskyDI

2008 Analysis of the Drosophila melanogaster testes transcriptome reveals coordinate regulation of paralogous genes. Genetics 179 305 315

59. SchuttC

NothigerR

2000 Structure, function and evolution of sex-determining systems in dipteran insects. Development 127 667 677

60. AlvarezM

RuizMF

SánchezL

2009 Effect of the gene doublesex of Anastrepha on the somatic sexual development of Drosophila. PLoS ONE 4 e5141 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005141

61. HedigerM

BurghardtG

SiegenthalerC

BuserN

Hilfiker-KleinerD

2004 Sex determination in Drosophila melanogaster and Musca domestica converges at the level of the terminal regulator doublesex. Dev Genes Evol 214 29 42

62. KuhnS

SievertV

TrautW

2002 The sex-determining gene doublesex in the fly Megaselia scalaris: conserved structure and sex-specific splicing. Genome 43 1011 1020

63. PaneA

De SimoneA

SacconeG

PolitoC

2005 Evolutionary conservation of Ceratitis capitata transformer gene function. Genetics 171 615 624

64. SacconeG

PaneA

PolitoLC

2002 Sex Determination in Flies, Fruitflies and Butterflies. Genetica 116 15 23

65. MarinI

BakerBS

1998 The evolutionary dynamics of sex determination. Science 281 1990 1994

66. ShearmanDCA

2002 The evolution of sex determination systems in dipteran insects other than Drosophila. Genetica 116 25 43

67. DaviesN

RoderickGK

2005 Dipteran sex chromsomes in evolutionary developmental biology.

YeatesDK

WeigmannBM

The Evolutionary Biology of Flies New York Columbia University Press 196 213

68. HedigerM

MinetAD

NiessenM

SchmidtR

Hilfiker-KleinerD

1998 The male-determining activity on the Y chromosome of the housefly (Musca domestica L.) consists of separable elements. Genetics 150 651 661

69. InoueH

FukimoriY

HiroyoshiT

1986 Mapping of autosomal male-determining factors of the housefly, Musca domestica L., by means of sex-reversal. Jpn J Genet 58 451 461

70. ZdobnovEM

von MeringC

LetunicI

TorrentsD

SuyamaM

2002 Comparative genome and proteome analysis of Anopheles gambiae and Drosophila melanogaster. Science 298 149 159

71. SeversonDW

deBruynB

LovinDD

BrownSE

KnudsonDL

2004 Comparative genome analysis of the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti with Drosophila melanogaster and the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles gambiae. J Hered 95 103 113

72. YeatesDK

WiegmannBM

2005 Phylogeny and evolution of Diptera: Recent insights and new perspectives.

YeatesDK

WiegmannBM

The Evolutionary Biology of Flies New York Columbia University Press 14 44

73. WilkinsAS

1995 Moving up the hierarchy: A hypothesis on the evolution of a genetic sex determination pathway. Bioessays 17 71 77

74. SteinemannS

SteinemannM

2007 Evolution of sex chromosomes: dosage compensation of the Lcp1-4 gene cluster on the evolving neo-X chromosome in Drosophila miranda. Insect Mol Biol 16 167 174

75. BachtrogD

2004 Evidence that positive selection drives Y-chromosome degeneration in Drosophila miranda. Nat Genet 36 518 522

76. BachtrogD

2006 A dynamic view of sex chromosome evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev 16 578 585

77. EvansAL

MenaPA

McAllisterBF

2007 Positive selection near an inversion breakpoint on the neo-X chromosome of Drosophila americana. Genetics 177 1303 1319

78. RichardsS

LiuY

BettencourtBR

HradeckyP

LetovskyS

2005 Comparative genome sequencing of Drosophila pseudoobscura: Chromosomal, gene, and cis-element evolution. Genome Res 15 1 18

79. GelbartME

KurodaMI

2009 Drosophila dosage compensation: a complex voyage to the X chromosome. Development 136 1399 1410

80. RuizMF

EstebanMR

DonoroC

GodayC

SanchezL

2000 Evolution of dosage compensation in Diptera: The gene maleless implements dosage compensation in Drosophila (Brachycera suborder) but Its homolog in Sciara (Nematocera suborder) appears to play no role in dosage compensation. Genetics 156 1853 1865

81. EmersonJJ

KaessmannH

BetranE

LongMY

2004 Extensive gene traffic on the mammalian X chromosome. Science 303 537 540

82. VinckenboschN

DupanloupI

KaessmannH

2006 Evolutionary fate of retroposed gene copies in the human genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103 3220 3225

83. HahnMW

LanzaroG

2005 Female-biased gene expression in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Curr Biol 15 192 193

84. BegunDJ

HollowayAK

StevensK

HillierLW

PohY-P

2007 Population Genomics: Whole-Genome Analysis of Polymorphism and Divergence in Drosophila simulans. PLoS Biol 5 e310 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050310

85. SinghND

LarracuenteAM

ClarkAG

2008 Contrasting the efficacy of selection on the X and autosomes in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol 25 454 467

86. BetancourtAJ

PresgravesDC

SwansonWJ

2002 A test for faster X evolution in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol 19 1816 1819

87. ConnallonT

2007 Adaptive protein evolution of X-linked and autosomal genes in Drosophila: Implications for faster-X hypotheses. Mol Biol Evol 24 2566 2572

88. ThorntonK

BachtrogD

AndolfattoP

2006 X chromosomes and autosomes evolve at similar rates in Drosophila: No evidence for faster-X protein evolution. Genome Res 16 498 504

89. GiladY

RifkinSA

BertoneP

GersteinM

WhiteKP

2005 Multi-species microarrays reveal the effect of sequence divergence on gene expression profiles. Genome Res 15 674 680

90. ChristiansonSJ

SwallowJG

WilkinsonGS

2005 Rapid evolution of postzygotic reproductive isolation in stalk-eyed flies. Evolution 59 849 857

91. BakerRH

WilkinsonGS

DeSalleR

2001 The phylogenetic utility of different types of molecular data used to infer evolutionary relationships among stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Syst Biol 50 87 105

92. FoldvariM

PomiankowskiA

CottonS

CarrM

2007 A morphological and molecular description of a new Teleopsis species (Diptera: Diopsidae) from Thailand. Zootaxa 1620 37 51

93. ChristiansonSJ

2008 Reproductive isolation and X chromosome meiotic drive in Cyrtodiopsis stalk-eyed flies [Dissertation]. College Park University of Maryland 135

94. HartiganJA

WongMA

1979 A K-Means Clustering Algorithm. Appl Stat 28 100 108

95. SaeedA

SharovV

WhiteJ

LiJ

LiangW

2003 TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis. Biotechniques 34 374 378

96. Castillo-DavisCI

HartlDL

2003 GeneMerge—post-genomic analysis, data mining, and hypothesis testing. Bioinformatics 19 891 892

97. SAS Institute 2003 JMP. Cary, N.C. SAS Institute, Inc 5.0.1.2 ed.

98. WrightTF

JohnsPM

WaltersJR

LernerAP

SwallowJG

2004 Microsatellite variation among divergent populations of stalk-eyed flies, genus Cyrtodiopsis. Genet Res 84 27 40

99. BirgeL

PittsM

BakerR

WilkinsonG

2010 Length polymorphism and head shape association among genes with polyglutamine repeats in the stalk-eyed fly, Teleopsis dalmanni. BMC Evol Biol 10 227

100. Van OoijenJW

2006 JoinMap ® 4, Software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps in experimental populations. Wageningen, Netherlands Kyazma B.V

Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicína

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Genetics


2010 Číslo 9
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
nový kurz
Autori: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#