Ganglioside and Non-ganglioside Mediated Host Responses to the Mouse Polyomavirus
Biological and structural studies have combined to give a detailed understanding of how the mouse polyomavirus binds to sialyloligosaccharides, how polymorphisms in the sialic acid binding pocket of the major virus capsid protein constitute important determinants of pathogenicity, and how gangliosides function as receptors for cell entry and infection by the virus. We used mice with knockouts in defined ganglioside biosynthetic pathways to determine whether gangliosides alone suffice to mediate lethal infection in the intact host and whether non-gangliosides are also recognized by the virus and utilized for important physiological responses. We confirmed the requirement of specific gangliosides for infection and determined that not all gangliosides that bind in vitro serve as receptors in vivo. Results also revealed two physiologically important responses that do not require MuPyV-ganglioside interactions: i) rapid induction of c-fos in fibroblasts as an early step in cell cycle progression on which the virus depends for its own replication, and ii). activation of cytokine secretion by antigen presenting cells as a critical innate immune response to the virus. We infer that these responses are mediated by non-ganglioside receptors bearing sialic acid. These results serve to illustrate the multiplicity of MuPyV receptors and the complexity of virus-cell surface interactions.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Ganglioside and Non-ganglioside Mediated Host Responses to the Mouse Polyomavirus. PLoS Pathog 11(10): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005175
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005175
Souhrn
Biological and structural studies have combined to give a detailed understanding of how the mouse polyomavirus binds to sialyloligosaccharides, how polymorphisms in the sialic acid binding pocket of the major virus capsid protein constitute important determinants of pathogenicity, and how gangliosides function as receptors for cell entry and infection by the virus. We used mice with knockouts in defined ganglioside biosynthetic pathways to determine whether gangliosides alone suffice to mediate lethal infection in the intact host and whether non-gangliosides are also recognized by the virus and utilized for important physiological responses. We confirmed the requirement of specific gangliosides for infection and determined that not all gangliosides that bind in vitro serve as receptors in vivo. Results also revealed two physiologically important responses that do not require MuPyV-ganglioside interactions: i) rapid induction of c-fos in fibroblasts as an early step in cell cycle progression on which the virus depends for its own replication, and ii). activation of cytokine secretion by antigen presenting cells as a critical innate immune response to the virus. We infer that these responses are mediated by non-ganglioside receptors bearing sialic acid. These results serve to illustrate the multiplicity of MuPyV receptors and the complexity of virus-cell surface interactions.
Zdroje
1. DeCaprio JA, Garcea RL (2013) A cornucopia of human polyomaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol 11: 264–276. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2992 23474680
2. Tsai B, Gilbert JM, Stehle T, Lencer W, Benjamin TL, et al. (2003) Gangliosides are receptors for murine polyoma virus and SV40. EMBO J 22: 4346–4355. 12941687
3. Qian M, Cai D, Verhey KJ, Tsai B (2009) A lipid receptor sorts polyomavirus from the endolysosome to the endoplasmic reticulum to cause infection. PLoS pathogens 5: e1000465. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000465 19503604
4. Magnuson B, Rainey EK, Benjamin T, Baryshev M, Mkrtchian S, et al. (2005) ERp29 triggers a conformational change in polyomavirus to stimulate membrane binding. Mol Cell 20: 289–300. 16246730
5. Tsai B, Qian M (2010) Cellular entry of polyomaviruses. Current topics in microbiology and immunology 343: 177–194. doi: 10.1007/82_2010_38 20373089
6. Lilley BN, Gilbert JM, Ploegh HL, Benjamin TL (2006) Murine polyomavirus requires the endoplasmic reticulum protein Derlin-2 to initiate infection. J Virol 80: 8739–8744. 16912321
7. Gilbert J, Ou W, Silver J, Benjamin T (2006) Downregulation of protein disulfide isomerase inhibits infection by the mouse polyomavirus. J Virol 80: 10868–10870. 16928750
8. Walczak CP, Ravindran MS, Inoue T, Tsai B (2014) A cytosolic chaperone complexes with dynamic membrane J-proteins and mobilizes a nonenveloped virus out of the endoplasmic reticulum. PLoS pathogens 10: e1004007. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004007 24675744
9. Swimm AI, Bornmann W, Jiang M, Imperiale MJ, Lukacher AE, et al. (2010) Abl family tyrosine kinases regulate sialylated ganglioside receptors for polyomavirus. J Virol 84: 4243–4251. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00129-10 20181697
10. Stehle T, Harrison SC (1996) Crystal structures of murine polyomavirus in complex with straight-chain and branched-chain sialyloligosaccharide receptor fragments. Structure 4: 183–194. 8805524
11. Stehle T, Harrison SC (1997) High-resolution structure of a polyomavirus VP1-oligosaccharide complex: implications for assembly and receptor binding. EMBO J 16: 5139–5148. 9305654
12. Stehle T, Yan Y, Benjamin TL, Harrison SC (1994) Structure of murine polyomavirus complexed with an oligosaccharide receptor fragment. Nature 369: 160–163. 8177322
13. Yan Y, Stehle T, Liddington RC, Zhao H, Harrison SC (1996) Structure determination of simian virus 40 and murine polyomavirus by a combination of 30-fold and 5-fold electron-density averaging. Structure 4: 157–164. 8805522
14. Neu U, Allen SA, Blaum BS, Liu Y, Frank M, et al. (2013) A structure-guided mutation in the major capsid protein retargets BK polyomavirus. PLoS Pathog 9: e1003688. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003688 24130487
15. Neu U, Bauer J, Stehle T (2011) Viruses and sialic acids: rules of engagement. Curr Opin Struct Biol 21: 610–618. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.08.009 21917445
16. Neu U, Hengel H, Blaum BS, Schowalter RM, Macejak D, et al. (2012) Structures of Merkel cell polyomavirus VP1 complexes define a sialic acid binding site required for infection. PLoS Pathog 8: e1002738. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002738 22910713
17. Neu U, Stehle T, Atwood WJ (2009) The Polyomaviridae: Contributions of virus structure to our understanding of virus receptors and infectious entry. Virology 384: 389–399. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.12.021 19157478
18. Caruso M, Belloni L, Sthandier O, Amati P, Garcia MI (2003) Alpha4beta1 integrin acts as a cell receptor for murine polyomavirus at the postattachment level. J Virol 77: 3913–3921. 12634351
19. Caruso M, Cavaldesi M, Gentile M, Sthandier O, Amati P, et al. (2003) Role of sialic acid-containing molecules and the alpha4beta1 integrin receptor in the early steps of polyomavirus infection. J Gen Virol 84: 2927–2936. 14573797
20. Benjamin TL (2007) Chapter 5. Polyoma Viruses. In The Mouse in Biomedical Research, 2nd Edition Fox JJ, Davisson MT, Quimby FW, Barthold AW, Newcomer CE, Smith AL, editors Academic Press: 105–139.
21. Dubensky TW, Freund R, Dawe CJ, Benjamin TL (1991) Polyomavirus replication in mice: influences of VP1 type and route of inoculation. J Virol 65: 342–349. 1845895
22. Freund R, Calderone A, Dawe CJ, Benjamin TL (1991) Polyomavirus tumor induction in mice: effects of polymorphisms of VP1 and large T antigen. J Virol 65: 335–341. 1845894
23. Bauer PH, Bronson RT, Fung SC, Freund R, Stehle T, et al. (1995) Genetic and structural analysis of a virulence determinant in polyomavirus VP1. J Virol 69: 7925–7931. 7494305
24. Bauer PH, Cui C, Liu WR, Stehle T, Harrison SC, et al. (1999) Discrimination between sialic acid-containing receptors and pseudoreceptors regulates polyomavirus spread in the mouse. J Virol 73: 5826–5832. 10364334
25. Carroll J, Dey D, Kreisman L, Velupillai P, Dahl J, et al. (2007) Receptor-binding and oncogenic properties of polyoma viruses isolated from feral mice. PLoS Pathog 3: e179. 18085820
26. Buch MHC, Liaci AM, OHara SD, Garcea RL, Neu U, Stehle T. (2015) Structural and Functional Analysis of Murine Polyomavirus Capsid Proteins Establish the Determinants of Ligand Recognition and Pathogenicity. PLoS Pathog 11: e1005104.
27. Bolen JB, Fisher SE, Chowdhury K, Shan TC, Williams JE, et al. (1985) A determinant of polyomavirus virulence enhances virus growth in cells of renal origin. J Virol 53: 335–339. 2981359
28. Gilbert J, Benjamin T (2004) Uptake pathway of polyomavirus via ganglioside GD1a. J Virol 78: 12259–12267. 15507613
29. Gilbert J, Dahl J, Riney C, You J, Cui C, et al. (2005) Ganglioside GD1a restores infectibility to mouse cells lacking functional receptors for polyomavirus. J Virol 79: 615–618. 15596855
30. Zullo J, Stiles CD, Garcea RL (1987) Regulation of c-myc and c-fos mRNA levels by polyomavirus: distinct roles for the capsid protein VP1 and the viral early proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84: 1210–1214. 3029770
31. Barber JR, Verma IM (1987) Modification of fos proteins: phosphorylation of c-fos, but not v-fos, is stimulated by 12-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate and serum. Mol Cell Biol 7: 2201–2211. 3110603
32. Velupillai P, Carroll JP, Benjamin TL (2002) Susceptibility to polyomavirus-induced tumors in inbred mice: role of innate immune responses. J Virol 76: 9657–9663. 12208944
33. Velupillai P, Garcea RL, Benjamin TL (2006) Polyoma virus-like particles elicit polarized cytokine responses in APCs from tumor-susceptible and -resistant mice. J Immunol 176: 1148–1153. 16394003
34. Qian M, Tsai B (2010) Lipids and proteins act in opposing manners to regulate polyomavirus infection. J Virol 84: 9840–9852. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01093-10 20668088
35. Cahan LD, Singh R, Paulson JC (1983) Sialyloligosaccharide receptors of binding variants of polyoma virus. Virology 130: 281–289. 6316632
36. Winocour E (1963) Purification of polyoma virus. Virology 19: 158–168. 14001211
37. Schaffhausen BS, Benjamin TL (1976) Deficiency in histone acetylation in nontransforming host range mutants of polyoma virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 73: 1092–1096. 177973
38. Velupillai P, Sung CK, Andrews E, Moran J, Beier D, et al. (2012) Polymorphisms in toll-like receptor 4 underlie susceptibility to tumor induction by the mouse polyomavirus. J Virol 86: 11541–11547. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01614-12 22896604
Štítky
Hygiena a epidemiológia Infekčné lekárstvo LaboratóriumČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Pathogens
2015 Číslo 10
- Očkování proti virové hemoragické horečce Ebola experimentální vakcínou rVSVDG-ZEBOV-GP
- Parazitičtí červi v terapii Crohnovy choroby a dalších zánětlivých autoimunitních onemocnění
- Koronavirus hýbe světem: Víte jak se chránit a jak postupovat v případě podezření?
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Chronobiomics: The Biological Clock as a New Principle in Host–Microbial Interactions
- Interferon-γ: The Jekyll and Hyde of Malaria
- Crosslinking of a Peritrophic Matrix Protein Protects Gut Epithelia from Bacterial Exotoxins
- Modulation of the Surface Proteome through Multiple Ubiquitylation Pathways in African Trypanosomes