Multivalent Adhesion Molecule 7 Clusters Act as Signaling Platform for Host Cellular GTPase Activation and Facilitate Epithelial Barrier Dysfunction

English version České info

Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a bacterial pathogen which occurs in marine and estuarine environments. It is a main cause of gastrointestinal illness following the consumption of raw or undercooked seafood. In immunocompromised people, the bacteria can sometimes enter the bloodstream and cause septicemia, a serious and often fatal condition. V. parahaemolyticus attaches to host tissues using adhesive proteins. Multivalent Adhesion Molecule (MAM) 7 is an adhesin which helps the bacteria to hold onto the host cells early on during infection. It does so by binding two different molecules on the host, a protein (fibronectin) and phospholipids called phosphatidic acids. We show that MAM7 does not only play a role in sticking to host cells. By forming adhesin clusters on the host surface and binding to host lipids, it triggers signaling processes in the host. These include activation of RhoA, an important mediator of cytoskeletal dynamics. By doing so, MAM7 perturbs proteins at cellular junctions, which normally maintain the cells in the gut as a tightly sealed layer protective of environmental influences. When bacteria use MAM7 to attach to the intestine, the seals between cells break, permitting bacteria to cross the barrier and cause infection of underlying tissues.

Vyšlo v časopise: Multivalent Adhesion Molecule 7 Clusters Act as Signaling Platform for Host Cellular GTPase Activation and Facilitate Epithelial Barrier Dysfunction. PLoS Pathog 10(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004421
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004421

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. ShimohataT, TakahashiA (2010) Diarrhea induced by infection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J Med Invest 57: 179–182.

2. YeungPS, BoorKJ (2004) Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and prevention of foodborne Vibrio parahaemolyticus infections. Foodborne Pathog Dis 1: 74–88.

3. EcheverriaMJ, Lopez de GoicoecheaMJ, AyarzaR, BerdoncesP, de RafaelL (1998) [Wound infection caused by Vibrio parahaemolyticus]. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 16: 205–207.

4. AhmadA, BrumbleL, ManiaciM (2013) Vibrio parahaemolyticus Induced Necrotizing Fasciitis: An Atypical Organism Causing an Unusual Presentation. Case Rep Infect Dis 2013: 216854.

5. HallyRJ, RubinRA, FraimowHS, Hoffman-TerryML (1995) Fatal Vibrio parahemolyticus septicemia in a patient with cirrhosis. A case report and review of the literature. Dig Dis Sci 40: 1257–1260.

6. RitchieJM, RuiH, ZhouX, IidaT, KodomaT, et al. (2012) Inflammation and disintegration of intestinal villi in an experimental model for Vibrio parahaemolyticus-induced diarrhea. PLoS Pathog 8: e1002593.

7. BrobergCA, CalderTJ, OrthK (2011) Vibrio parahaemolyticus cell biology and pathogenicity determinants. Microbes Infect 13: 992–1001.

8. ParkKS, OnoT, RokudaM, JangMH, OkadaK, et al. (2004) Functional characterization of two type III secretion systems of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Infect Immun 72: 6659–6665.

9. YarbroughML, LiY, KinchLN, GrishinNV, BallHL, et al. (2009) AMPylation of Rho GTPases by Vibrio VopS disrupts effector binding and downstream signaling. Science 323: 269–272.

10. SreelathaA, BennettTL, ZhengH, JiangQX, OrthK, et al. (2013) Vibrio effector protein, VopQ, forms a lysosomal gated channel that disrupts host ion homeostasis and autophagic flux. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 11559–11564.

11. BrobergCA, ZhangL, GonzalezH, Laskowski-ArceMA, OrthK (2010) A Vibrio effector protein is an inositol phosphatase and disrupts host cell membrane integrity. Science 329: 1660–1662.

12. ZhangL, KrachlerAM, BrobergCA, LiY, MirzaeiH, et al. (2012) Type III effector VopC mediates invasion for Vibrio species. Cell Rep 1: 453–460.

13. LynchT, LivingstoneS, BuenaventuraE, LutterE, FedwickJ, et al. (2005) Vibrio parahaemolyticus disruption of epithelial cell tight junctions occurs independently of toxin production. Infect Immun 73: 1275–1283.

14. KrachlerAM, HamH, OrthK (2011) Outer membrane adhesion factor multivalent adhesion molecule 7 initiates host cell binding during infection by gram-negative pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 11614–11619.

15. KrachlerAM, OrthK (2011) Functional characterization of the interaction between bacterial adhesin multivalent adhesion molecule 7 (MAM7) protein and its host cell ligands. J Biol Chem 286: 38939–38947.

16. VoelkerDR (1991) Organelle biogenesis and intracellular lipid transport in eukaryotes. Microbiol Rev 55: 543–560.

17. YoungBP, ShinJJ, OrijR, ChaoJT, LiSC, et al. Phosphatidic acid is a pH biosensor that links membrane biogenesis to metabolism. Science 329: 1085–1088.

18. WangX, DevaiahSP, ZhangW, WeltiR (2006) Signaling functions of phosphatidic acid. Prog Lipid Res 45: 250–278.

19. KooijmanEE, ChupinV, de KruijffB, BurgerKN (2003) Modulation of membrane curvature by phosphatidic acid and lysophosphatidic acid. Traffic 4: 162–174.

20. AndresenBT, RizzoMA, ShomeK, RomeroG (2002) The role of phosphatidic acid in the regulation of the Ras/MEK/Erk signaling cascade. FEBS Lett 531: 65–68.

21. FangY, Vilella-BachM, BachmannR, FlaniganA, ChenJ (2001) Phosphatidic acid-mediated mitogenic activation of mTOR signaling. Science 294: 1942–1945.

22. FrankC, KeilhackH, OpitzF, ZschornigO, BohmerFD (1999) Binding of phosphatidic acid to the protein-tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 as a basis for activity modulation. Biochemistry 38: 11993–12002.

23. HaestCW, OslenderA, KampD (1997) Nonmediated flip-flop of anionic phospholipids and long-chain amphiphiles in the erythrocyte membrane depends on membrane potential. Biochemistry 36: 10885–10891.

24. RaggersRJ, PomorskiT, HolthuisJC, KalinN, van MeerG (2000) Lipid traffic: the ABC of transbilayer movement. Traffic 1: 226–234.

25. BodinS, GiuriatoS, RagabJ, HumbelBM, VialaC, et al. (2001) Production of phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate and phosphatidic acid in platelet rafts: evidence for a critical role of cholesterol-enriched domains in human platelet activation. Biochemistry 40: 15290–15299.

26. ParkKS, OnoT, RokudaM, JangMH, IidaT, et al. (2004) Cytotoxicity and enterotoxicity of the thermostable direct hemolysin-deletion mutants of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Microbiol Immunol 48: 313–318.

27. AktoriesK, JustI (2005) Clostridial Rho-inhibiting protein toxins. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 291: 113–145.

28. WelchMD, MallavarapuA, RosenblattJ, MitchisonTJ (1997) Actin dynamics in vivo. Curr Opin Cell Biol 9: 54–61.

29. MaekawaM, IshizakiT, BokuS, WatanabeN, FujitaA, et al. (1999) Signaling from Rho to the actin cytoskeleton through protein kinases ROCK and LIM-kinase. Science 285: 895–898.

30. JohD, WannER, KreikemeyerB, SpezialeP, HookM (1999) Role of fibronectin-binding MSCRAMMs in bacterial adherence and entry into mammalian cells. Matrix Biol 18: 211–223.

31. MeenanNA, VisaiL, ValtulinaV, Schwarz-LinekU, NorrisNC, et al. (2007) The tandem beta-zipper model defines high affinity fibronectin-binding repeats within Staphylococcus aureus FnBPA. J Biol Chem 282: 25893–25902.

32. EnsenbergerMG, Tomasini-JohanssonBR, SottileJ, OzeriV, HanskiE, et al. (2001) Specific interactions between F1 adhesin of Streptococcus pyogenes and N-terminal modules of fibronectin. J Biol Chem 276: 35606–35613.

33. HawleyCA, WatsonCA, OrthK, KrachlerAM (2013) A MAM7 peptide-based inhibitor of Staphylococcus aureus adhesion does not interfere with in vitro host cell function. PLoS One 8: e81216.

34. PintoM, Robine-LeonS, AppayMD, KedingerM, TriadouN, et al. (1983) Enterocyte-like Differentiation and Polarization of the Human Colon Carcinoma Cell Line Caco-2 in Culture. Biol Cell 47: 323–330.

35. InghamKC, BrewS, VazD, SauderDN, McGavinMJ (2004) Interaction of Staphylococcus aureus fibronectin-binding protein with fibronectin: affinity, stoichiometry, and modular requirements. J Biol Chem 279: 42945–42953.

36. HanskiE, JaffeJ, OzeriV (1996) Proteins F1 and F2 of Streptococcus pyogenes. Properties of fibronectin binding. Adv Exp Med Biol 408: 141–150.

37. MukherjeeS, LiuX, ArasakiK, McDonoughJ, GalanJE, et al. (2011) Modulation of Rab GTPase function by a protein phosphocholine transferase. Nature 477: 103–106.

38. HamH, SreelathaA, OrthK (2011) Manipulation of host membranes by bacterial effectors. Nat Rev Microbiol 9: 635–646.

39. NishidaE (1985) Opposite effects of cofilin and profilin from porcine brain on rate of exchange of actin-bound adenosine 5′-triphosphate. Biochemistry 24: 1160–1164.

40. SchlegelN, MeirM, SpindlerV, GermerCT, WaschkeJ (2011) Differential role of Rho GTPases in intestinal epithelial barrier regulation in vitro. J Cell Physiol 226: 1196–1203.

41. SimonovicI, RosenbergJ, KoutsourisA, HechtG (2000) Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli dephosphorylates and dissociates occludin from intestinal epithelial tight junctions. Cell Microbiol 2: 305–315.

42. McNamaraBP, KoutsourisA, O'ConnellCB, NougayredeJP, DonnenbergMS, et al. (2001) Translocated EspF protein from enteropathogenic Escherichia coli disrupts host intestinal barrier function. J Clin Invest 107: 621–629.

43. ChinAC, TeohDA, ScottKG, MeddingsJB, MacnaughtonWK, et al. (2002) Strain-dependent induction of enterocyte apoptosis by Giardia lamblia disrupts epithelial barrier function in a caspase-3-dependent manner. Infect Immun 70: 3673–3680.

44. CaburlottoG, LleoMM, HiltonT, HuqA, ColwellRR, et al. (2010) Effect on human cells of environmental Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains carrying type III secretion system 2. Infect Immun 78: 3280–3287.

45. FinnR, AhmadT, CoffeyET, BraydenDJ, BairdAW, et al. (2014) Translocation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus across an in vitro M cell model. FEMS Microbiol Lett 350: 65–71.