Evidence of a Bacterial Receptor for Lysozyme: Binding of Lysozyme to the Anti-σ Factor RsiV Controls Activation of the ECF σ Factor σ
All cells sense and respond to changes in their environments by transmitting information across the membrane. In bacteria, σ factors provide promoter specificity to RNA polymerase. Bacteria encode Extra-Cytoplasmic Function (ECF) σ factors, which often respond to extracellular signals. Activation of some ECF σ factors is controlled by stepwise proteolytic destruction of an anti-σ factor which is initiated by a site-1 protease. In most cases, the site-1 protease required to initiate the RIP process is thought to be the signal sensor. Here we report that the anti-σ factor RsiV, and not the site-1 protease, is the sensor for σV activation. Activation of the ECF σ factor σV is induced by lysozyme, an innate immune defense enzyme. We identify the site-1 protease as signal peptidase, which is required for general protein secretion. The anti-σ factor RsiV directly binds lysozyme. Binding of lysozyme to RsiV allows signal peptidase to cleave RsiV at site-1 and this leads to activation of σV. Thus, the anti-σ factor functions as a bacterial receptor for lysozyme. RsiV homologs from C. difficile and E. faecalis also bind lysozyme, suggesting they may utilize this receptor-ligand mechanism to control activation of σV to induce lysozyme resistance.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Evidence of a Bacterial Receptor for Lysozyme: Binding of Lysozyme to the Anti-σ Factor RsiV Controls Activation of the ECF σ Factor σ. PLoS Genet 10(10): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004643
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004643
Souhrn
All cells sense and respond to changes in their environments by transmitting information across the membrane. In bacteria, σ factors provide promoter specificity to RNA polymerase. Bacteria encode Extra-Cytoplasmic Function (ECF) σ factors, which often respond to extracellular signals. Activation of some ECF σ factors is controlled by stepwise proteolytic destruction of an anti-σ factor which is initiated by a site-1 protease. In most cases, the site-1 protease required to initiate the RIP process is thought to be the signal sensor. Here we report that the anti-σ factor RsiV, and not the site-1 protease, is the sensor for σV activation. Activation of the ECF σ factor σV is induced by lysozyme, an innate immune defense enzyme. We identify the site-1 protease as signal peptidase, which is required for general protein secretion. The anti-σ factor RsiV directly binds lysozyme. Binding of lysozyme to RsiV allows signal peptidase to cleave RsiV at site-1 and this leads to activation of σV. Thus, the anti-σ factor functions as a bacterial receptor for lysozyme. RsiV homologs from C. difficile and E. faecalis also bind lysozyme, suggesting they may utilize this receptor-ligand mechanism to control activation of σV to induce lysozyme resistance.
Zdroje
1. WangX, SatoR, BrownMS, HuaX, GoldsteinJL (1994) SREBP-1, a membrane-bound transcription factor released by sterol-regulated proteolysis. Cell 77: 53–62.
2. HoTD, EllermeierCD (2012) Extra cytoplasmic function σ factor activation. Curr Opin Microbiol 15: 182–188 doi:10.1016/j.mib.2012.01.001
3. StarońA, SofiaHJ, DietrichS, UlrichLE, LiesegangH, et al. (2009) The third pillar of bacterial signal transduction: classification of the extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factor protein family. Mol Microbiol 74: 557–581 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06870.x
4. AdesSE, ConnollyLE, AlbaBM, GrossCA (1999) The Escherichia coli sigmaE-dependent extracytoplasmic stress response is controlled by the regulated proteolysis of an anti-sigma factor. Genes Dev 13: 2449–2461.
5. AlbaBM, LeedsJa, OnufrykC, LuCZ, GrossCA (2002) DegS and YaeL participate sequentially in the cleavage of RseA to activate the sigmaE-dependent extracytoplasmic stress response. Genes Dev 16: 2156–2168 doi:10.1101/gad.1008902
6. WalshNP, AlbaBM, BoseB, GrossCA, SauerRT (2003) OMP peptide signals initiate the envelope-stress response by activating DegS protease via relief of inhibition mediated by its PDZ domain. Cell 113: 61–71.
7. WilkenC, KitzingK, KurzbauerR, EhrmannM, ClausenT (2004) Crystal structure of the DegS stress sensor: How a PDZ domain recognizes misfolded protein and activates a protease. Cell 117: 483–494.
8. EllermeierCD, LosickR (2006) Evidence for a novel protease governing regulated intramembrane proteolysis and resistance to antimicrobial peptides in Bacillus subtilis. Genes Dev 20: 1911–1922 doi:10.1101/gad.1440606
9. HoTD, HastieJL, IntilePJ, EllermeierCD (2011) The Bacillus subtilis extracytoplasmic function σ factor σV is induced by lysozyme and provides resistance to lysozyme. J Bacteriol 193: 6215–6222 doi:10.1128/JB.05467-11
10. Guariglia-OropezaV, HelmannJD (2011) Bacillus subtilis σV confers lysozyme resistance by activation of two cell wall modification pathways, peptidoglycan O-acetylation and D-alanylation of teichoic acids. J Bacteriol 193: 6223–6232 doi:10.1128/JB.06023-11
11. HoTD, EllermeierCD (2011) PrsW is required for colonization, resistance to antimicrobial peptides, and expression of extracytoplasmic function σ factors in Clostridium difficile. Infect Immun 79: 3229–3238 doi:10.1128/IAI.00019-11
12. Le JeuneA, TorelliR, SanguinettiM, GiardJ-C, HartkeA, et al. (2010) The extracytoplasmic function sigma factor SigV plays a key role in the original model of lysozyme resistance and virulence of Enterococcus faecalis. PLoS One 5: e9658 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009658
13. HoTD, WilliamsKB, ChenY, HelmRF, PophamDL, et al. (2014) Clostridium difficile Extra-Cytoplasmic Function σ factor σV regulates lysozyme resistance and is necessary for pathogenesis in the hamster model of infection. Infect Immun IAI.01483–13–. doi:10.1128/IAI.01483-13
14. HastieJL, WilliamsKB, EllermeierCD (2013) The activity of σV, an Extra-Cytoplasmic Function σ factor of Bacillus subtilis, is controlled by a regulated proteolysis of the anti-σ factor RsiV. J Bacteriol 195: 3135–3144 doi:10.1128/JB.00292-13
15. EDMANP (1949) A method for the determination of amino acid sequence in peptides. Arch Biochem 22: 475.
16. PetersenTN, BrunakS, von HeijneG, NielsenH (2011) SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods 8: 785–786 doi:10.1038/nmeth.1701
17. BaileyTL, BodenM, BuskeFa, FrithM, GrantCE, et al. (2009) MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res 37: W202–8 doi:10.1093/nar/gkp335
18. Krogha, LarssonB, von HeijneG, SonnhammerEL (2001) Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 305: 567–580 doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315
19. TjalsmaH, NobackMA, BronS, VenemaG, YamaneK, et al. (1997) Bacillus subtilis Contains Four Closely Related Type I Signal Peptidases with Overlapping Substrate Specificities. J Biol Chem 272: 25983–25992.
20. TjalsmaH, BolhuisA, van RoosmalenML, WiegertT, SchumannW, et al. (1998) Functional analysis of the secretory precursor processing machinery of Bacillus subtilis: identification of a eubacterial homolog of archaeal and eukaryotic signal peptidases. Genes Dev 12: 2318–2331 doi:10.1101/gad.12.15.2318
21. AlyKa, BeebeET, ChanCH, GorenMa, SepúlvedaC, et al. (2013) Cell-free production of integral membrane aspartic acid proteases reveals zinc-dependent methyltransferase activity of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa prepilin peptidase PilD. Microbiologyopen 2: 94–104 doi:10.1002/mbo3.51
22. PrehnS, WiedmannM, RapoportTA, ZwiebC (1987) Protein translocation across wheat germ microsomal membranes requires an SRP-like component. EMBO J 6: 2093–2097.
23. PerlmanD, HalvorsonHO (1983) A putative signal peptidase recognition site and sequence in eukaryotic and prokaryotic signal peptides. J Mol Biol 167: 391–409.
24. AmanoK, HayashiH, ArakiY, ItoE (1977) The Action of Lysozyme on Peptidoglycan with N-Unsubstituted Glucosamine Residues. Eur J Biochem 76: 299–307.
25. DupontC, ClarkeaJ (1991) Dependence of lysozyme-catalysed solubilization of Proteus mirabilis peptidoglycan on the extent of O-acetylation. Eur J Biochem 195: 763–769.
26. ChipmanDM, SharonN (1969) Mechanism of lysozyme action. Science 165: 454–465.
27. LichensteinHS, HastingsAE, LangleyKE, MendiazEA, RohdeMF, et al. (1990) Cloning and nucleotide sequence of the N-acetylmuramidase M1-encoding gene from Streptomyces globisporus. Gene 88: 81–86.
28. NashJA, BallardTNS, WeaverTE, AkinbiHT (2006) The peptidoglycan-degrading property of lysozyme is not required for bactericidal activity in vivo. J Immunol 177: 519–526.
29. KumitaJR, JohnsonRJK, AlcocerMJC, DumoulinM, HolmqvistF, et al. (2006) Impact of the native-state stability of human lysozyme variants on protein secretion by Pichia pastoris. FEBS J 273: 711–720 doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.05099.x
30. BenachourA, MullerC, Dabrowski-CotonM, Le BretonY, GiardJ-C, et al. (2005) The Enterococcus faecalis SigV protein is an extracytoplasmic function sigma factor contributing to survival following heat, acid, and ethanol treatments. J Bacteriol 187: 1022–1035 doi:10.1128/JB.187.3.1022-1035.2005
31. KangJG, PagetMS, SeokYJ, HahnMY, BaeJB, et al. (1999) RsrA, an anti-sigma factor regulated by redox change. EMBO J 18: 4292–4298 doi:10.1093/emboj/18.15.4292
32. LiW, BottrillAR, BibbMJ, ButtnerMJ, PagetMSB, et al. (2003) The Role of Zinc in the Disulphide Stress-regulated Anti-sigma Factor RsrA from Streptomyces coelicolor. J Mol Biol 333: 461–472 doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2003.08.038
33. PagetMS, BaeJB, HahnMY, LiW, KleanthousC, et al. (2001) Mutational analysis of RsrA, a zinc-binding anti-sigma factor with a thiol-disulphide redox switch. Mol Microbiol 39: 1036–1047.
34. GreenwellR, NamT-W, DonohueTJ (2011) Features of Rhodobacter sphaeroides ChrR required for stimuli to promote the dissociation of σE/ChrR complexes. J Mol Biol 407: 477–491 doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2011.01.055
35. CampbellEa, GreenwellR, AnthonyJR, WangS, LimL, et al. (2007) A conserved structural module regulates transcriptional responses to diverse stress signals in bacteria. Mol Cell 27: 793–805 doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.009
36. BraunV, MahrenS, OgiermanM (2003) Regulation of the FecI-type ECF sigma factor by transmembrane signalling. Curr Opin Microbiol 6: 173–180 doi:10.1016/S1369-5274(03)00022-5
37. ChabaR, AlbaBM, GuoMS, SohnJ, AhujaN, et al. (2011) Signal integration by DegS and RseB governs the sigmaE-mediated envelope stress response in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108: 2106 doi: = 10.1073/pnas.1019277108 =
38. KulpA, KuehnMJ (2011) Recognition of β-strand motifs by RseB is required for σ(E) activity in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 193: 6179–6186 doi:10.1128/JB.05657-11
39. LimaS, GuoMS, ChabaR, GrossCA, SauerRT (2013) Dual molecular signals mediate the bacterial response to outer-membrane stress. Science 340: 837–841 doi:10.1126/science.1235358
40. KavanaughJS, ThoendelM, HorswillAR (2007) A role for type I signal peptidase in Staphylococcus aureus quorum sensing. Mol Microbiol 65: 780–798 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05830.x
41. StephensonS, MuellerC, JiangM, PeregoM (2003) Molecular Analysis of Phr Peptide Processing in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 185: 4861–4871 doi:10.1128/JB.185.16.4861-4871.2003
42. JiangM, GrauR, PeregoM (2000) Differential Processing of Propeptide Inhibitors of Rap Phosphatases in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 182: 303–310 doi:10.1128/JB.182.2.303-310.2000
43. BongiorniC, IshikawaS, StephensonS, OgasawaraN, PeregoM (2005) Synergistic regulation of competence development in Bacillus subtilis by two Rap-Phr systems. J Bacteriol 187: 4353–4361 doi:10.1128/JB.187.13.4353-4361.2005
44. AuchtungJM, LeeCa, GrossmanAD (2006) Modulation of the ComA-dependent quorum response in Bacillus subtilis by multiple Rap proteins and Phr peptides. J Bacteriol 188: 5273–5285 doi:10.1128/JB.00300-06
45. PowersME, SmithPa, RobertsTC, FowlerBJ, KingCC, et al. (2011) Type I signal peptidase and protein secretion in Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Bacteriol 193: 340–348 doi:10.1128/JB.01052-10
46. LlarrullLI, TothM, ChampionMM, MobasheryS (2011) Activation of BlaR1 protein of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, its proteolytic processing, and recovery from induction of resistance. J Biol Chem 286: 38148–38158 doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.288985
47. VarahanS, IyerVS, MooreWT, HancockLE (2013) Eep Confers Lysozyme Resistance to Enterococcus faecalis via the Activation of the Extracytoplasmic Function Sigma Factor SigV. J Bacteriol 195: 3125–3134 doi:10.1128/JB.00291-13
48. SaitoA, HizukuriY, MatsuoE, ChibaS, MoriH, et al. (2011) Post-liberation cleavage of signal peptides is catalyzed by the site-2 protease (S2P) in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 13740–13745 doi:10.1073/pnas.1108376108
49. LaaberkiM-H, PfefferJ, ClarkeAJ, DworkinJ (2011) O-Acetylation of peptidoglycan is required for proper cell separation and S-layer anchoring in Bacillus anthracis. J Biol Chem 286: 5278–5288 doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.183236
50. BenachourA, LadjouziR, Le JeuneA, HébertL, ThorpeS, et al. (2012) The lysozyme-induced peptidoglycan N-acetylglucosamine deacetylase PgdA (EF1843) is required for Enterococcus faecalis virulence. J Bacteriol 194: 6066–6073 doi:10.1128/JB.00981-12
51. VollmerW, HöltjeJ (2004) The architecture of the murein (peptidoglycan) in gram-negative bacteria: vertical scaffold or horizontal layer(s)? J Bacteriol 186: 5978–5987 doi:10.1128/JB.186.18.5978-5987.2004
52. VollmerW (2008) Structural variation in the glycan strands of bacterial peptidoglycan. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32: 287–306 doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00088.x
53. BeraA, HerbertS, JakobA, VollmerW, GötzF (2005) Why are pathogenic staphylococci so lysozyme resistant? The peptidoglycan O-acetyltransferase OatA is the major determinant for lysozyme resistance of Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 55: 778–787 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04446.x
54. CallewaertL, Van HerrewegheJM, VanderkelenL, LeysenS, VoetA, et al. (2012) Guards of the great wall: bacterial lysozyme inhibitors. Trends Microbiol 20: 501–510 doi:10.1016/j.tim.2012.06.005
55. YokogawaK, KawataS, NishimuraS, IkedaY, YoshimuraY (1974) Mutanolysin, Bacteriolytic Agent for Cariogenic Streptococci: Partial Purification and Properties. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 6: 156–165 doi:10.1128/AAC.6.2.156
56. BudzikJM, OhS-Y, SchneewindO (2008) Cell wall anchor structure of BcpA pili in Bacillus anthracis. J Biol Chem 283: 36676–36686 doi:10.1074/jbc.M806796200
57. KobayashiK, SudiartaIP, KodamaT, FukushimaT, AraK, et al. (2012) Identification and characterization of a novel polysaccharide deacetylase C (PdaC) from Bacillus subtilis. J Biol Chem 287: 9765–9776 doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.329490
58. CoxCR, GilmoreMS (2007) Native microbial colonization of Drosophila melanogaster and its use as a model of Enterococcus faecalis pathogenesis. Infect Immun 75: 1565–1576 doi:10.1128/IAI.01496-06
59. CartmanST, La RagioneRM, WoodwardMJ (2008) Bacillus subtilis spores germinate in the chicken gastrointestinal tract. Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 5254–5258 doi:10.1128/AEM.00580-08
60. TamNKM, UyenNQ, HongHA, DucLH, HoaTT, et al. (2006) The Intestinal Life Cycle of Bacillus subtilis and Close Relatives. J Bacteriol 188: 2692–2700 doi:–10.1128/JB.188.7.2692–2700.2006
61. HongHa, KhanejaR, TamNMK, CazzatoA, TanS, et al. (2009) Bacillus subtilis isolated from the human gastrointestinal tract. Res Microbiol 160: 134–143 doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2008.11.002
62. IrwinDM, BiegelJM, StewartC-B (2011) Evolution of the mammalian lysozyme gene family. BMC Evol Biol 11: 166 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-166
63. YoungmanP, PerkinsJB, LosickR (1984) Construction of a cloning site near one end of Tn917 into which foreign DNA may be inserted without affecting transposition in Bacillus subtilis or expression of the transposon-borne erm gene. Plasmid 12: 1–9.
64. BottKF, WilsonGa (1967) Development of competence in the Bacillus subtilis transformation system. J Bacteriol 94: 562–570.
65. ArnaudM, ChastanetA, DébarbouilléM (2004) New vector for efficient allelic replacement in naturally nontransformable, low-GC-content, gram-positive bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 6887–6891 doi:10.1128/AEM.70.11.6887-6891.2004
66. GibsonDG, YoungL, ChuangR, VenterJC, HutchisonCA, et al. (2009) Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods 6: 343–345 doi:10.1038/nmeth.1318
67. Babu M, Butland G, Pogoutse O, Li J, Greenblatt JF, et al.. (2009) Sequential Peptide Affinity Purification System for the Systematic Isolation and Identification of Protein Complexes from Escherichia coli. In: Reinders J, Sickmann A, editors. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.). Methods in Molecular Biology™. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, Vol. 564. pp. 531–537. doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-157-8.
68. ZeghoufM, LiJ, ButlandG, BorkowskaA, CanadienV, et al. (2004) Sequential Peptide Affinity (SPA) System for the Identification of Mammalian and Bacterial Protein Complexes research articles. J Proteome Res 3: 463–468.
69. GietzRD, SchiestlRH (2007) Frozen competent yeast cells that can be transformed with high efficiency using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat Protoc 2: 1–4 doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.17
70. BishopDG, Op den KampJAF, Van deenenLLM (1977) The Distribution of Lipids in the Protoplast Membranes of Bacillus subtilis. Eur J Biochem 80: 381–391.
71. GriffithKL, WolfRE (2002) Measuring beta-galactosidase activity in bacteria: cell growth, permeabilization, and enzyme assays in 96-well arrays. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 290: 397–402 doi:10.1006/bbrc.2001.6152
72. SlauchJM, SilhavyTJ (1991) cis-acting ompF mutations that result in OmpR-dependent constitutive expression. J Bacteriol 173: 4039–4048.
73. OkaC, TanakaM, MurakiM, HarataK, SuzukiK, et al. (1999) Human lysozyme secretion increased by alpha-factor pro-sequence in Pichia pastoris. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 63: 1977–1983.
74. ShugarD (1952) The measurement of lysozyme activity and the ultra-violet inactivation of lysozyme. Biochim Biophys Acta 8: 302–309 doi:10.1016/0006-3002(52)90045-0
75. LeloupL, HaddaouiEA, ChambertR, Petit-GlatronM-F (1997) Characterization of the rate-limiting step of the secretion of Bacillus subtilis alpha-amamylase overproduced during the exponential phase of growth. Microbiology 143: 3295–3303.
76. ChangS, CohenSN (1979) High Frequency Transformation of Bacillus subtilis Protoplasts by Plasmid DNA. Mol Gen Genet 168: 111–115.
77. AltschulSF, MaddenTL, Schäfferaa, ZhangJ, ZhangZ, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389–3402.
78. PuntaM, CoggillPC, EberhardtRY, MistryJ, TateJ, et al. (2012) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D290–301 doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1065
79. Schutz-geschwenderA, ZhangY, HoltT, McdermittD, OliveDM, et al. (2004) Quantitative, Two-Color Western Blot Detection With Infrared Fluorescence. 800: 1–8.
80. Ben-YehudaS, RudnerDZ, LosickR (2003) RacA, a bacterial protein that anchors chromosomes to the cell poles. Science 299: 532–536 doi:10.1126/science.1079914
81. BlommelPG, MartinPa, WrobelRL, SteffenE, FoxBG (2006) High efficiency single step production of expression plasmids from cDNA clones using the Flexi Vector cloning system. Protein Expr Purif 47: 562–570 doi:10.1016/j.pep.2005.11.007
82. Guérout-FleuryAM, ShazandK, FrandsenN, StragierP (1995) Antibiotic-resistance cassettes for Bacillus subtilis. Gene 167: 335–336.
83. Guérout-FleuryAM, FrandsenN, StragierP (1996) Plasmids for ectopic integration in Bacillus subtilis. Gene 180: 57–61.
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2014 Číslo 10
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- The Master Activator of IncA/C Conjugative Plasmids Stimulates Genomic Islands and Multidrug Resistance Dissemination
- A Splice Mutation in the Gene Causes High Glycogen Content and Low Meat Quality in Pig Skeletal Muscle
- Keratin 76 Is Required for Tight Junction Function and Maintenance of the Skin Barrier
- A Role for Taiman in Insect Metamorphosis