#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Systematic Dissection of Coding Exons at Single Nucleotide Resolution Supports an Additional Role in Cell-Specific Transcriptional Regulation


Exons that code for protein can also have additional functions, such as regulating gene transcription through enhancer activity. Here, we changed every nucleotide in three different exons that also function as enhancers, and examined their enhancer activity to test whether nucleotide changes in these exons can affect both the protein sequence and enhancer function. We found that mutations with a significant effect on enhancer function can reside both in regions that change the protein sequence (non-synonymous) and regions that do not change it (synonymous). When we conducted a similar analysis in a different cell type, we observed a difference in the nucleotide changes that cause a significant effect on enhancer activity, suggesting that the enhancer functional units can differ between tissues.


Vyšlo v časopise: Systematic Dissection of Coding Exons at Single Nucleotide Resolution Supports an Additional Role in Cell-Specific Transcriptional Regulation. PLoS Genet 10(10): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004592
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004592

Souhrn

Exons that code for protein can also have additional functions, such as regulating gene transcription through enhancer activity. Here, we changed every nucleotide in three different exons that also function as enhancers, and examined their enhancer activity to test whether nucleotide changes in these exons can affect both the protein sequence and enhancer function. We found that mutations with a significant effect on enhancer function can reside both in regions that change the protein sequence (non-synonymous) and regions that do not change it (synonymous). When we conducted a similar analysis in a different cell type, we observed a difference in the nucleotide changes that cause a significant effect on enhancer activity, suggesting that the enhancer functional units can differ between tissues.


Zdroje

1. SaunaZE, Kimchi-SarfatyC (2011) Understanding the contribution of synonymous mutations to human disease. Nat Rev Genet 12: 683–691.

2. MercerTR, EdwardsSL, ClarkMB, NephSJ, WangH, et al. (2013) DNase I-hypersensitive exons colocalize with promoters and distal regulatory elements. Nat Genet 45: 852–859.

3. NackleyAG, ShabalinaSA, TchivilevaIE, SatterfieldK, KorchynskyiO, et al. (2006) Human catechol-O-methyltransferase haplotypes modulate protein expression by altering mRNA secondary structure. Science 314: 1930–1933.

4. LewisBP, BurgeCB, BartelDP (2005) Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell 120: 15–20.

5. BirnbaumRY, ClowneyEJ, AgamyO, KimMJ, ZhaoJ, et al. (2012) Coding exons function as tissue-specific enhancers of nearby genes. Genome Res

6. NeznanovN, UmezawaA, OshimaRG (1997) A regulatory element within a coding exon modulates keratin 18 gene expression in transgenic mice. J Biol Chem 272: 27549–27557.

7. DongX, NavratilovaP, FredmanD, DrivenesO, BeckerTS, et al. (2010) Exonic remnants of whole-genome duplication reveal cis-regulatory function of coding exons. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 1071–1085.

8. LampeX, SamadOA, GuiguenA, MatisC, RemacleS, et al. (2008) An ultraconserved Hox-Pbx responsive element resides in the coding sequence of Hoxa2 and is active in rhombomere 4. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 3214–3225.

9. RitterDI, DongZ, GuoS, ChuangJH Transcriptional enhancers in protein-coding exons of vertebrate developmental genes. PLoS One 7: e35202.

10. TumpelS, CambroneroF, SimsC, KrumlaufR, WiedemannLM (2008) A regulatory module embedded in the coding region of Hoxa2 controls expression in rhombomere 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 20077–20082.

11. VeltmanJA, BrunnerHG (2012) De novo mutations in human genetic disease. Nat Rev Genet 13: 565–575.

12. WangGS, CooperTA (2007) Splicing in disease: disruption of the splicing code and the decoding machinery. Nat Rev Genet 8: 749–761.

13. ShamseldinHE, FadenMA, AlashramW, AlkurayaFS (2012) Identification of a novel DLX5 mutation in a family with autosomal recessive split hand and foot malformation. J Med Genet 49: 16–20.

14. StergachisAB, HaugenE, ShaferA, FuW, VernotB, et al. (2013) Exonic transcription factor binding directs codon choice and affects protein evolution. Science 342: 1367–1372.

15. KheradpourP, ErnstJ, MelnikovA, RogovP, WangL, et al. (2013) Systematic dissection of regulatory motifs in 2000 predicted human enhancers using a massively parallel reporter assay. Genome Res 23: 800–811.

16. MelnikovA, MuruganA, ZhangX, TesileanuT, WangL, et al. (2012) Systematic dissection and optimization of inducible enhancers in human cells using a massively parallel reporter assay. Nat Biotechnol 30: 271–277.

17. PatwardhanRP, HiattJB, WittenDM, KimMJ, SmithRP, et al. (2012) Massively parallel functional dissection of mammalian enhancers in vivo. Nat Biotechnol 30: 265–270.

18. HaberleV, LenhardB (2012) Dissecting genomic regulatory elements in vivo. Nat Biotechnol 30: 504–506.

19. SharonE, KalmaY, SharpA, Raveh-SadkaT, LevoM, et al. (2012) Inferring gene regulatory logic from high-throughput measurements of thousands of systematically designed promoters. Nat Biotechnol 30: 521–530.

20. ShenY, YueF, McClearyDF, YeZ, EdsallL, et al. (2012) A map of the cis-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome. Nature 488: 116–120.

21. SakharkarMK, ChowVT, KangueaneP (2004) Distributions of exons and introns in the human genome. In Silico Biol 4: 387–393.

22. DunhamI, KundajeA, AldredSF, CollinsPJ, DavisCA, et al. (2012) An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489: 57–74.

23. ZhangG, BudkerV, WolffJA (1999) High levels of foreign gene expression in hepatocytes after tail vein injections of naked plasmid DNA. Hum Gene Ther 10: 1735–1737.

24. KimMJ, AhituvN (2013) The hydrodynamic tail vein assay as a tool for the study of liver promoters and enhancers. Methods Mol Biol 1015: 279–289.

25. MorwaldS, YamazakiH, BujoH, KusunokiJ, KanakiT, et al. (1997) A novel mosaic protein containing LDL receptor elements is highly conserved in humans and chickens. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 17: 996–1002.

26. PallesenLT, VaegterCB (2012) Sortilin and SorLA regulate neuronal sorting of trophic and dementia-linked proteins. Mol Neurobiol 45: 379–387.

27. Posse De ChavesEI, VanceDE, CampenotRB, KissRS, VanceJE (2000) Uptake of lipoproteins for axonal growth of sympathetic neurons. J Biol Chem 275: 19883–19890.

28. RyzhakovG, BlazekK, UdalovaIA (2011) Evolution of vertebrate immunity: sequence and functional analysis of the SEFIR domain family member Act1. J Mol Evol 72: 521–530.

29. EllinghausE, EllinghausD, StuartPE, NairRP, DebrusS, et al. (2010) Genome-wide association study identifies a psoriasis susceptibility locus at TRAF3IP2. Nat Genet 42: 991–995.

30. HuffmeierU, UebeS, EkiciAB, BowesJ, GiardinaE, et al. (2010) Common variants at TRAF3IP2 are associated with susceptibility to psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis. Nat Genet 42: 996–999.

31. XiaYF, LiYD, LiX, GengJG (2002) Identification of alternatively spliced Act1 and implications for its roles in oncogenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 296: 406–412.

32. QianY, QinJ, CuiG, NaramuraM, SnowEC, et al. (2004) Act1, a negative regulator in CD40- and BAFF-mediated B cell survival. Immunity 21: 575–587.

33. BarakY, NelsonMC, OngES, JonesYZ, Ruiz-LozanoP, et al. (1999) PPAR gamma is required for placental, cardiac, and adipose tissue development. Mol Cell 4: 585–595.

34. HiattJB, PatwardhanRP, TurnerEH, LeeC, ShendureJ (2010) Parallel, tag-directed assembly of locally derived short sequence reads. Nat Methods 7: 119–122.

35. FisherS, GriceEA, VintonRM, BesslingSL, McCallionAS (2006) Conservation of RET regulatory function from human to zebrafish without sequence similarity. Science 312: 276–279.

36. McGaugheyDM, VintonRM, HuynhJ, Al-SaifA, BeerMA, et al. (2007) Metrics of sequence constraint overlook regulatory sequences in an exhaustive analysis at phox2b. Genome Res 10: 10.

37. DixonJR, SelvarajS, YueF, KimA, LiY, et al. (2012) Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485: 376–380.

38. JinF, LiY, DixonJR, SelvarajS, YeZ, et al. (2013) A high-resolution map of the three-dimensional chromatin interactome in human cells. Nature 503: 290–294.

39. NgPC, HenikoffS (2006) Predicting the effects of amino acid substitutions on protein function. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 7: 61–80.

40. LinMF, KheradpourP, WashietlS, ParkerBJ, PedersenJS, et al. (2011) Locating protein-coding sequences under selection for additional, overlapping functions in 29 mammalian genomes. Genome Res 21: 1916–1928.

41. ViselA, PrabhakarS, AkiyamaJA, ShoukryM, LewisKD, et al. (2008) Ultraconservation identifies a small subset of extremely constrained developmental enhancers. Nat Genet 40: 158–160.

42. MarguliesEH, CooperGM, AsimenosG, ThomasDJ, DeweyCN, et al. (2007) Analyses of deep mammalian sequence alignments and constraint predictions for 1% of the human genome. Genome Res 17: 760–774.

43. BlowMJ, McCulleyDJ, LiZ, ZhangT, AkiyamaJA, et al. (2010) ChIP-Seq identification of weakly conserved heart enhancers. Nat Genet 42: 806–810.

44. SchmidtD, WilsonMD, BallesterB, SchwaliePC, BrownGD, et al. (2010) Five-vertebrate ChIP-seq reveals the evolutionary dynamics of transcription factor binding. Science 328: 1036–1040.

45. HooverDM, LubkowskiJ (2002) DNAWorks: an automated method for designing oligonucleotides for PCR-based gene synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res 30: e43.

46. BoganAA, Dallas-YangQ, RuseMDJr, MaedaY, JiangG, et al. (2000) Analysis of protein dimerization and ligand binding of orphan receptor HNF4alpha. J Mol Biol 302: 831–851.

47. EferlR, WagnerEF (2003) AP-1: a double-edged sword in tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Cancer 3: 859–868.

48. SladekFM, RuseMDJr, NepomucenoL, HuangSM, StallcupMR (1999) Modulation of transcriptional activation and coactivator interaction by a splicing variation in the F domain of nuclear receptor hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha1. Mol Cell Biol 19: 6509–6522.

49. HermansenR, SierraMA, JohnsonJ, FriezM, MilavetzB (1996) Identification of Simian virus 40 promoter DNA sequences capable of conferring restriction endonuclease hypersensitivity. J Virol 70: 3416–3422.

50. SimonetWS, BucayN, LauerSJ, TaylorJM (1993) A far-downstream hepatocyte-specific control region directs expression of the linked human apolipoprotein E and C-I genes in transgenic mice. J Biol Chem 268: 8221–8229.

51. KelAE, GosslingE, ReuterI, CheremushkinE, Kel-MargoulisOV, et al. (2003) MATCH: A tool for searching transcription factor binding sites in DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3576–3579.

52. MatysV, Kel-MargoulisOV, FrickeE, LiebichI, LandS, et al. (2006) TRANSFAC and its module TRANSCompel: transcriptional gene regulation in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D108–110.

Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicína

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Genetics


2014 Číslo 10
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
nový kurz
Autori: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#