Fast Evolution from Precast Bricks: Genomics of Young Freshwater Populations of Threespine Stickleback
Adaptation to novel environments is a keystone of evolution. There is only a handful of natural and experimental systems in which the process of adaptation has been studied in detail, and each studied system brings its own surprises with regard to the number of loci involved, dynamics of adaptation, extent of interactions between loci and of parallelism between different adapting populations. The threespine stickleback is an excellent model organism for evolutionary studies. Marine-derived freshwater populations of this species have consistently acquired a specific set of morphological, physiological and behavioral traits allowing them to reside in freshwater for their whole lifespan. Previous studies identified several genomic regions responsible for this adaptation. Here, using whole-genome sequencing, we compare the allele frequencies at such regions in four derived freshwater populations of known ages: two natural, and two artificially established in 1978. Knowledge of population ages allows us to infer the strength of selection that acted at these loci. Adaptation of threespine stickleback to freshwater is typically fast, and is driven by strong selection favoring pre-existing alleles that are likely present in the ancestral marine population at low frequencies; however, some of the adaptation may also be due to young population-specific alleles.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Fast Evolution from Precast Bricks: Genomics of Young Freshwater Populations of Threespine Stickleback. PLoS Genet 10(10): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004696
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004696
Souhrn
Adaptation to novel environments is a keystone of evolution. There is only a handful of natural and experimental systems in which the process of adaptation has been studied in detail, and each studied system brings its own surprises with regard to the number of loci involved, dynamics of adaptation, extent of interactions between loci and of parallelism between different adapting populations. The threespine stickleback is an excellent model organism for evolutionary studies. Marine-derived freshwater populations of this species have consistently acquired a specific set of morphological, physiological and behavioral traits allowing them to reside in freshwater for their whole lifespan. Previous studies identified several genomic regions responsible for this adaptation. Here, using whole-genome sequencing, we compare the allele frequencies at such regions in four derived freshwater populations of known ages: two natural, and two artificially established in 1978. Knowledge of population ages allows us to infer the strength of selection that acted at these loci. Adaptation of threespine stickleback to freshwater is typically fast, and is driven by strong selection favoring pre-existing alleles that are likely present in the ancestral marine population at low frequencies; however, some of the adaptation may also be due to young population-specific alleles.
Zdroje
1. BellMA, AguirreWE, BuckNJ (2004) Twelve years of contemporary armor evolution in a threespine stickleback population. Evolution 58: 814–824.
2. CookLM (2003) The rise and fall of the carbonaria form of the peppered moth. Q Rev Biol 78: 399–417.
3. GrantPR, GrantBR (2002) Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin's finches. Science 296: 707–711.
4. KryazhimskiyS, RiceDP, DesaiMM (2012) Population subdivision and adaptation in asexual populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Evolution 66: 1931–1941.
5. WiserMJ, RibeckN, LenskiRE (2013) Long-term dynamics of adaptation in asexual populations. Science 342: 1364–1367.
6. BarrettRDH, RogersSM, SchluterD (2008) Natural selection on a major armor gene in threespine stickleback. Science 322: 255–257.
7. KolbeJJ, LealM, SchoenerTW, SpillerDA, LososJB (2012) Founder effects persist despite adaptive differentiation: a field experiment with lizards. Science 335: 1086–1089.
8. BarrettRDH, SchluterD (2007) Adaptation from standing genetic variation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23: 38–44.
9. RadwanJ, BabikW (2012) The genomics of adaptation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279: 5024–5028.
10. StapleyJ, RegerJ, FeulnerPGD, SmadjaC, GalindoJ, et al. (2010) Adaptation genomics: the next generation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25: 705–712.
11. EllegrenH, SmedsL, BurriR, OlasonPI, BackstromN, et al. (2012) The genomic landscape of species divergence in Ficedula flycatchers. Nature 491: 756–760.
12. LiuS, Lorenzen ElineD, FumagalliM, LiB, HarrisK, et al. (2014) Population genomics reveal recent speciation and rapid evolutionary adaptation in polar bears. Cell 157: 785–794.
13. Soria-CarrascoV, GompertZ, ComeaultAA, FarkasTE, ParchmanTL, et al. (2014) Stick insect genomes reveal natural selection's role in parallel speciation. Science 344: 738–742.
14. ConteGL, ArnegardME, PeichelCL, SchluterD (2012) The probability of genetic parallelism and convergence in natural populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279: 5039–5047.
15. JonesFC, GrabherrMG, ChanYF, RussellP, MauceliE, et al. (2012) The genomic basis of adaptive evolution in threespine sticklebacks. Nature 484: 55–61.
16. Bell MA, Foster SA (1994) The evolutionary biology of the threespine stickleback. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 571 p.
17. HagenDW, GilbertsonLG (1972) Geographic variation and environmental selection in Gasterosteus aculeatus L. in the Pacific Northwest, America. Evolution 26: 32–51.
18. HagenDW (1967) Isolating mechanisms in threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 24: 1637–1692.
19. McKinnonJS, RundleHD (2002) Speciation in nature: the threespine stickleback model systems. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 480–488.
20. BellMA (1995) Intraspecific systematics of Gasterosteus aculeatus populations: implications for behavioral ecology. Behaviour 132: 15–16.
21. HohenlohePA, BasshamS, CurreyM, CreskoWA (2012) Extensive linkage disequilibrium and parallel adaptive divergence across threespine stickleback genomes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 367: 395–408.
22. HohenlohePA, BasshamS, EtterPD, StifflerN, JohnsonEA, et al. (2010) Population genomics of parallel adaptation in threespine stickleback using sequenced RAD tags. PLoS Genet 6: e1000862.
23. SchluterD, ConteGL (2009) Genetics and ecological speciation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 9955–9962.
24. ShimadaY, ShikanoT, MerilaJ (2011) A high incidence of selection on physiologically important genes in the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Mol Biol Evol 28: 181–193.
25. BellMA (2001) Lateral plate evolution in the threespine stickleback: getting nowhere fast. Genetica 112: 445–461.
26. LoehrJ, LeinonenT, HerczegG, O'HaraRB, MeriläJ (2012) Heritability of asymmetry and lateral plate number in the threespine stickleback. PLoS ONE 7: e39843.
27. ColosimoPF, HosemannKE, BalabhadraS, VillarrealGJr, DicksonM, et al. (2005) Widespread parallel evolution in sticklebacks by repeated fixation of Ectodysplasin alleles. Science 307: 1928–1933.
28. JonesFC, BrownC, PembertonJM, BraithwaiteVA (2006) Reproductive isolation in a threespine stickleback hybrid zone. J Evol Biol 19: 1531–1544.
29. FurinCG, von HippelFA, BellMA (2012) Partial reproductive isolation of a recently derived resident-freshwater population of threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) from its putative anadromous ancestor. Evolution 66: 3277–3286.
30. ZiuganovVV, GolovatjukGJ, SavvaitovaKA, BugaevVF (1987) Genetically isolated sympatric forms of threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus, in Lake Azabachije (Kamchatka-peninsula, USSR). Environ Biol Fish 18: 241–247.
31. KarveAD, von HippelFA, BellMA (2008) Isolation between sympatric anadromous and resident threespine stickleback species in Mud Lake, Alaska. Environ Biol Fishes 81: 287–296.
32. McKinnonJS, MoriS, BlackmanBK, DavidL, KingsleyDM, et al. (2004) Evidence for ecology's role in speciation. Nature 429: 294–298.
33. ZiuganovVV (1978) Factors determining morphological differentiation in Gasterosteus aculeatus (Pisces, Gasterosteidae) (in Russian). Zool Zhurn 57: 1686–1694.
34. ZiuganovVV (1983) Genetics of osteal plate polymorphism and microevolution of threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Theor Appl Genet 65: 239–246.
35. ClarkPU, DykeAS, ShakunJD, CarlsonAE, ClarkJ, et al. (2009) The Last Glacial Maximum. Science 325: 710–714.
36. CornerGD, KolkaVV, YevzerovVY, MollerJJ (2001) Postglacial relative sea-level change and stratigraphy of raised coastal basins on the Kola Peninsula, northwest Russia. Glob Planet Change 31: 153–175.
37. KolkaVV, KorsakovaOP (2005) Application of geological methods for dating of stone labyrinths on the White Sea coast. Proceedings of the MSTU 15: 349–356.
38. NatriHM, ShikanoT, MeriläJ (2013) Progressive recombination suppression and differentiation in recently evolved neo-sex chromosomes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 1131–1144.
39. RoestiM, MoserD, BernerD (2013) Recombination in the threespine stickleback genome–patterns and consequences. Molecular Ecology 22: 3014–3027.
40. McDonaldJH, KreitmanM (1991) Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 351: 652–654.
41. AapoTK, AlistairRE, IrmaT, JukkaJ (2004) Nonindependence of mammalian dental characters. Nature 432: 211–214.
42. KaplanJH (2002) Biochemistry of Na,K-ATPase. Annu Rev Biochem 71: 511–535.
43. Allali-HassaniA, PanPW, DombrovskiL, NajmanovichR, TempelW, et al. (2007) Structural and Chemical Profiling of the Human Cytosolic Sulfotransferases. PLoS Biol 5: e97.
44. NeerincxA, LautzK, MenningM, KremmerE, ZigrinoP, et al. (2010) A role for the human nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich repeat-containing family member NLRC5 in antiviral responses. J Biol Chem 285: 26223–26232.
45. WeltC, SidisY, KeutmannH, SchneyerA (2002) Activins, inhibins, and follistatins: from endocrinology to signaling. A paradigm for the new millennium. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 227: 724–752.
46. ArugaJ, YokotaN, MikoshibaK (2003) Human SLITRK family genes: genomic organization and expression profiling in normal brain and brain tumor tissue. Gene 315: 87–94.
47. ParkC, FallsW, FingerJH, Longo-GuessCM, AckermanSL (2002) Deletion in Catna2, encoding alpha N-catenin, causes cerebellar and hippocampal lamination defects and impaired startle modulation. Nat Genet 31: 279–284.
48. WagnerGF, JaworskiEM, HaddadM (1998) Stanniocalcin in the seawater salmon: structure, function, and regulation. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 274: R1177–R1185.
49. ThompsonAJ, LummisSCR (2006) 5-HT3 receptors. Curr Pharm Des 12: 3615–3630.
50. KawaharaR, NishidaM (2007) Extensive lineage-specific gene duplication and evolution of the spiggin multi-gene family in stickleback. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 209–221.
51. KlionAD, NutmanTB (2004) The role of eosinophils in host defense against helminth parasites. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 113: 30–37.
52. ChiuS-L, ClineHT (2010) Insulin receptor signaling in the development of neuronal structure and function. Neural Development 5: 1–18.
53. RotherKI, AcciliD (2000) Role of insulin receptors and IGF receptors in growth and development. Pediatric Nephrology 14: 558–561.
54. Haldane JBS (1924) A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection. Part 1. Transactions of the Cambridge philosophical society Trinity College, Cambridge. pp. 19–41.
55. MillerCT, GlazerAM, SummersBR, BlackmanBK, NormanAR, et al. (2014) Modular skeletal evolution in sticklebacks is controlled by additive and clustered quantitative trait loci. Genetics 197: 405–420.
56. McCairnsRJS, BernatchezL (2010) Adaptive divergence between freshwater and marine sticklebacks: insights into the role of phenotypic plasticity from an integrated analysis of candidate gene expression. Evolution 64: 1029–1047.
57. BuhiWC (2002) Characterization and biological roles of oviduct-specific, oestrogen-dependent glycoprotein. Reproduction 123: 355–362.
58. DeFaveriJ, ShikanoT, ShimadaY, GotoA, MerilaJ (2011) Global analysis of genes involved in freshwater adaptation in threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Evolution 65: 1800–1807.
59. SmithJM, HaighJ (2009) The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res 23: 23–35.
60. ChanYF, MarksME, JonesFC, VillarrealGJr, ShapiroMD, et al. (2010) Adaptive evolution of pelvic reduction in sticklebacks by recurrent deletion of a Pitx1 enhancer. Science 327: 302–305.
61. WrayGA (2007) The evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations. Nat Rev Genet 8: 206–216.
62. BersaglieriT, SabetiPC, PattersonN, VanderploegT, SchaffnerSF, et al. (2004) Genetic signatures of strong recent positive selection at the lactase gene. Am J Hum Genet 74: 1111–1120.
63. RockmanMV, HahnMW, SoranzoN, ZimprichF, GoldsteinDB, et al. (2005) Ancient and recent positive selection transformed opioid cis-regulation in humans. PLoS Biol 3: e387.
64. WildeS, TimpsonA, KirsanowK, KaiserE, KayserM, et al. (2014) Direct evidence for positive selection of skin, hair, and eye pigmentation in Europeans during the last 5,000 y. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111: 4832–4837.
65. LandeR (1976) Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30: 314–334.
66. LynchM (2010) Evolution of the mutation rate. Trends Genet 26: 345–352.
67. LefflerEM, GaoZ, PfeiferS, SegurelL, AutonA, et al. (2013) Multiple instances of ancient balancing selection shared between humans and chimpanzees. Science 339: 1578–1582.
68. HermissonJ, PenningsPS (2005) Soft sweeps: molecular population genetics of adaptation from standing genetic variation. Genetics 169: 2335–2352.
69. RoestiM, GavriletsS, HendryAP, SalzburgerW, BernerD (2014) The genomic signature of parallel adaptation from shared genetic variation. Molecular Ecology 23: 3944–3956.
70. FaustováM, SacherováV, SvenssonJ-E, TaylorDJ (2011) Radiation of european Eubosmina (Cladocera) from Bosmina (E.) longispina –concordance of multipopulation molecular data with paleolimnology. Limnol Oceanogr 56: 440–450.
71. DimmickWW, BerendzenPB, GolubtsovAS (2001) Genetic comparison of three barbus (Cyprinidae) Morphotypes from the Genale River, Ethiopia. Copeia 2001: 1123–1129.
72. NagelkerkeLAJ, SibbingFA, BoogaartJGM, LammensEHRR, OsseJWM (1994) The barbs (Barbus spp.) of Lake Tana: a forgotten species flock? Environ Biol Fish 39: 1–22.
73. Alekseyev SS, Pichugin MY, Samusenok VP. Studies of charrs Salvelinus alpinus complex from Transbaikalia (distribution, diversity and the problem of sympatric forms). Proceedings of the Eighth and Ninth ISACF Workshops on Arctic Char, 1996 and 1998. University of Maine Printing Office Orono. pp. 71–86.
74. SenchukovaAL, PavlovSD, Mel'nikovaMN, MugueNS (2012) Genetic differentiation of chars (Genus Salvelinus) from lake Kronotskoe based on analysis of mitochondrial DNA. J Ichthyol 52: 389–399.
75. KrasnovaED, PantyulinAN, BelevichTA, VoronovDA, DemidenkoNA, et al. (2013) Multidisciplinary studies of the separating lakes at different stage of isolation from the White Sea performed in March 2012. Oceanology 53: 639–642.
76. Gillespie JH (2004) Population genetics: a concise guide: Johns Hopkins University Press. 214 p.
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2014 Číslo 10
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- The Master Activator of IncA/C Conjugative Plasmids Stimulates Genomic Islands and Multidrug Resistance Dissemination
- A Splice Mutation in the Gene Causes High Glycogen Content and Low Meat Quality in Pig Skeletal Muscle
- Keratin 76 Is Required for Tight Junction Function and Maintenance of the Skin Barrier
- A Role for Taiman in Insect Metamorphosis