The Formation of Endoderm-Derived Taste Sensory Organs Requires a -Dependent Expansion of Embryonic Taste Bud Progenitor Cells
Gustatory perception is an evolutionary ancient sense, and the ability to discriminate toxic and digestible substances is vitally important for all organisms. In mammals, taste perception occurs in taste buds, groups of sensory cells that are housed in various types of taste papillae in the oral cavity. Little is known about the genetic and developmental programs that underlie the different architectures of these papillae. Using mouse models, we identified the transcription factor Pax9 as a major determinant for the development of endoderm-derived taste papillae, which develop in different locations in the back of the oral cavity. In these papillae, Pax9 regulates the expansion of the taste progenitor field, maintains the competence of these progenitors to interact with afferent nerve fibers of the glossopharyngeal nerve, and prevents their differentiation towards epidermal-like epithelial cells. In contrast, Pax9 is not required for the development of ectoderm-derived taste papillae that are distributed over the dorsum of the tongue. Our data reveal that mammals have evolved a specific developmental program to generate taste buds and associated papilla structures in different parts of the oral cavity.
Vyšlo v časopise:
The Formation of Endoderm-Derived Taste Sensory Organs Requires a -Dependent Expansion of Embryonic Taste Bud Progenitor Cells. PLoS Genet 10(10): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004709
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004709
Souhrn
Gustatory perception is an evolutionary ancient sense, and the ability to discriminate toxic and digestible substances is vitally important for all organisms. In mammals, taste perception occurs in taste buds, groups of sensory cells that are housed in various types of taste papillae in the oral cavity. Little is known about the genetic and developmental programs that underlie the different architectures of these papillae. Using mouse models, we identified the transcription factor Pax9 as a major determinant for the development of endoderm-derived taste papillae, which develop in different locations in the back of the oral cavity. In these papillae, Pax9 regulates the expansion of the taste progenitor field, maintains the competence of these progenitors to interact with afferent nerve fibers of the glossopharyngeal nerve, and prevents their differentiation towards epidermal-like epithelial cells. In contrast, Pax9 is not required for the development of ectoderm-derived taste papillae that are distributed over the dorsum of the tongue. Our data reveal that mammals have evolved a specific developmental program to generate taste buds and associated papilla structures in different parts of the oral cavity.
Zdroje
1. IwasakiS (2002) Evolution of the structure and function of the vertebrate tongue. J Anat 201: 1–13.
2. NorthcuttRG (2004) Taste buds: development and evolution. Brain Behav Evol 64: 198–206.
3. KapsimaliM, BarlowLA (2013) Developing a sense of taste. Semin Cell Dev Biol 24: 200–209.
4. IwatsukiK, LiuHX, GrónderA, SingerMA, LaneTF, et al. (2007) Wnt signaling interacts with Shh to regulate taste papilla development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 2253–2258.
5. LiuF, ThirumangalathuS, GallantNM, YangSH, Stoick-CooperCL, et al. (2007) Wnt-beta-catenin signaling initiates taste papilla development. Nat Genet 39: 106–112.
6. MistrettaCM, LiuHX, GaffieldW, MacCallumDK (2003) Cyclopamine and jervine in embryonic rat tongue cultures demonstrate a role for Shh signaling in taste papilla development and patterning: fungiform papillae double in number and form in novel locations in dorsal lingual epithelium. Dev Biol 254: 1–18.
7. HallJM, BellML, FingerTE (2003) Disruption of sonic hedgehog signaling alters growth and patterning of lingual taste papillae. Dev Biol 255: 263–277.
8. ZhouY, LiuHX, MistrettaCM (2006) Bone morphogenetic proteins and noggin: inhibiting and inducing fungiform taste papilla development. Dev Biol 297: 198–213.
9. BeitesCL, HollenbeckPL, KimJ, Lovell-BadgeR, LanderAD, et al. (2009) Follistatin modulates a BMP autoregulatory loop to control the size and patterning of sensory domains in the developing tongue. Development 136: 2187–2197.
10. CongerAD, WellsMA (1969) Radiation and Aging Effect on Taste Structure and Function. Radiat Res 37: 31–49.
11. LeeMJ, KimJY, LeeSI, SasakiH, LunnyDP, et al. (2006) Association of Shh and Ptc with keratin localization in the initiation of the formation of circumvallate papilla and von Ebner's gland. Cell Tissue Res 325: 253–261.
12. GrünebergH (1971) The glandular aspects of the tabby syndrome in the mouse. J Embryol Exp Morphol 25: 1–19.
13. WellsKL, MouC, HeadonDJ, TuckerAS (2010) Defects and rescue of the minor salivary glands in Eda pathway mutants. Dev Biol 349: 137–146.
14. PetersenCI, JheonAH, MostowfiP, CharlesC, ChingS, et al. (2011) FGF signaling regulates the number of posterior taste papillae by controlling progenitor field size. PLoS Genet 7: e1002098.
15. IchikawaH, De RepentignyY, KotharyR, SugimotoT (2006) The survival of vagal and glossopharyngeal sensory neurons is dependent upon dystonin. Neuroscience 137: 531–536.
16. NosratIV, AgermanK, MarinescuA, ErnforsP, NosratCA (2004) Lingual deficits in neurotrophin double knockout mice. J Neurocytol 33: 607–615.
17. SuzukiY, IkedaK, KawakamiK (2011) Development of gustatory papillae in the absence of Six1 and Six4. J Anat 219: 710–721.
18. NeubüserA, KosekiH, BallingR (1995) Characterization and developmental expression of Pax9, a paired-box-containing gene related to Pax1. Dev Biol 170: 701–716.
19. WallinJ, WiltingJ, KosekiH, FritschR, ChristB, et al. (1994) The role of Pax-1 in axial skeleton development. Development 120: 1109–1121.
20. WallinJ, EibelH, NeubüserA, WiltingJ, KosekiH, et al. (1996) Pax1 is expressed during development of the thymus epithelium and is required for normal T-cell maturation. Development 122: 23–30.
21. PetersH, NeubüserA, KratochwilK, BallingR (1998) Pax9-deficient mice lack pharyngeal pouch derivatives and teeth and exhibit craniofacial and limb abnormalities. Genes Dev 12: 2735–2747.
22. PetersH, WilmB, SakaiN, ImaiK, MaasR, et al. (1999) Pax1 and Pax9 synergistically regulate vertebral column development. Development 126: 5399–5408.
23. KozmikZ (2005) Pax genes in eye development and evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev 15: 430–438.
24. BlakeJA, ZimanMR (2014) Pax genes: regulators of lineage specification and progenitor cell maintenance. Development 141: 737–751.
25. JonkerL, KistR, AwA, WapplerI, PetersH (2004) Pax9 is required for filiform papilla development and suppresses skin-specific differentiation of the mammalian tongue epithelium. Mech Dev 121: 1313–1322.
26. KistR, GreallyE, PetersH (2007) Derivation of a mouse model for conditional inactivation of Pax9. Genesis 45: 460–464.
27. DanielianPS, MuccinoD, RowitchDH, MichaelSK, McMahonAP (1998) Modification of gene activity in mouse embryos in utero by a tamoxifen-inducible form of Cre recombinase. Curr Biol 8: 1323–1326.
28. VasioukhinV, DegensteinL, WiseB, FuchsE (1999) The magical touch: genome targeting in epidermal stem cells induced by tamoxifen application to mouse skin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 8551–8556.
29. OkuboT, ClarkC, HoganBL (2009) Cell lineage mapping of taste bud cells and keratinocytes in the mouse tongue and soft palate. Stem Cells 27: 442–450.
30. MollR, FrankeWW, SchillerDL, GeigerB, KreplerR (1982) The catalog of human cytokeratins: patterns of expression in normal epithelia, tumors and cultured cells. Cell 31: 11–24.
31. OkuboT, PevnyLH, HoganBL (2006) Sox2 is required for development of taste bud sensory cells. Genes Dev 20: 2654–2659.
32. SternZ, SharonP, LigumskyM, LevijM, RachmilewitzD (1980) Glycogenic acanthosis of the esophagus: a benign but confusing endoscopic lesion. Am J Gastroenterol 74: 261–263.
33. BloorBK, TidmanN, LeighIM, OdellE, DoganB, et al. (2003) Expression of keratin K2e in cutaneous and oral lesions: association with keratinocyte activation, proliferation, and keratinization. Am J Pathol 162: 963–975.
34. MbieneJP, RobertsJD (2003) Distribution of keratin 8-containing cell clusters in mouse embryonic tongue: evidence for a prepattern for taste bud development. J Comp Neurol 457: 111–122.
35. MiuraH, KusakabeY, KatoH, Miura-OhnumaJ, TagamiM, et al. (2003) Co-expression pattern of Shh with Prox1 and that of Nkx2.2 with Mash1 in mouse taste bud. Gene Expr Patterns 3: 427–430.
36. TakedaM, SuzukiY, ObaraN, NagaiY (1992) Neural cell adhesion molecule of taste buds. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 41: 375–380.
37. StateFA, BowdenRE (1974) Innervation and cholinesterase activity of the developing taste buds in the circumvallate papilla of the mouse. J Anat 118: 211–221.
38. AhPinP, EllisS, ArnottC, KaufmanMH (1998) Prenatal Development and Innervation of the Circumvallate Papilla in the Mouse. J Anat 162: 33–42.
39. WakisakaS, MiyawakiY, YounSH, KatoJ, KurisuK (1996) Protein gene-product 9.5 in developing mouse circumvallate papilla: comparison with neuron-specific enolase and calcitonin gene-related peptide. Anat Embryol (Berl) 194: 365–372.
40. HallJM, HooperJE, FingerTE (1999) Expression of sonic hedgehog, patched, and Gli1 in developing taste papillae of the mouse. J Comp Neurol 406: 143–155.
41. St-JacquesB, DassuleHR, KaravanovaI, BotchkarevVA, LiJ, et al. (1998) Sonic hedgehog signaling is essential for hair development. Curr Biol 8: 1058–1068.
42. DassuleHR, LewisP, BeiM, MaasR, McMahonAP (2000) Sonic hedgehog regulates growth and morphogenesis of the tooth. Development 127: 4775–4785.
43. JaskollT, LeoT, WitcherD, OrmestadM, AstorgaJ, et al. (2004) Sonic hedgehog signaling plays an essential role during embryonic salivary gland epithelial branching morphogenesis. Dev Dyn 229: 722–732.
44. SinhaS, ChenJK (2006) Purmorphamine activates the Hedgehog pathway by targeting Smoothened. Nat Chem Biol 2: 29–30.
45. BastideP, DaridoC, PannequinJ, KistR, RobineS, et al. (2007) Sox9 regulates cell proliferation and is required for Paneth cell differentiation in the intestinal epithelium. J Cell Biol 178: 635–648.
46. FantauzzoKA, KurbanM, LevyB, ChristianoAM (2012) Trps1 and its target gene Sox9 regulate epithelial proliferation in the developing hair follicle and are associated with hypertrichosis. PLoS Genet 8: e1003002.
47. SuD, EllisS, NapierA, LeeK, ManleyNR (2001) Hoxa3 and Pax1 regulate epithelial cell death and proliferation during thymus and parathyroid organogenesis. Dev Biol 236: 316–329.
48. WilmB, DahlE, PetersH, BallingR, ImaiK (1998) Targeted disruption of Pax1 defines its null phenotype and proves haploinsufficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 8692–8697.
49. NakayamaA, MiuraH, ShindoY, KusakabeY, TomonariH, et al. (2008) Expression of the basal cell markers of taste buds in the anterior tongue and soft palate of the mouse embryo. J Comp Neurol 509: 211–224.
50. NguyenHM, BarlowLA (2010) Differential expression of a BMP4 reporter allele in anterior fungiform versus posterior circumvallate taste buds of mice. BMC Neurosci 11: 129.
51. EngertS, LiaoWP, BurtscherI, LickertH (2009) Sox17-2A-iCre: a knock-in mouse line expressing Cre recombinase in endoderm and vascular endothelial cells. Genesis 47: 603–610.
52. RothovaM, ThompsonH, LickertH, TuckerAS (2012) Lineage tracing of the endoderm during oral development. Dev Dyn 241: 1183–1191.
53. CobourneMT, HardcastleZ, SharpePT (2001) Sonic hedgehog regulates epithelial proliferation and cell survival in the developing tooth germ. J Dent Res 80: 1974–1979.
54. Gritli-LindeA, BeiM, MaasR, ZhangXM, LindeA, et al. (2002) Shh signaling within the dental epithelium is necessary for cell proliferation, growth and polarization. Development 129: 5323–5337.
55. MillP, MoR, FuH, GrachtchoukM, KimPC, et al. (2003) Sonic hedgehog-dependent activation of Gli2 is essential for embryonic hair follicle development. Genes Dev 17: 282–294.
56. LiuHX, ErmilovA, GrachtchoukM, LiL, GumucioDL, et al. (2013) Multiple Shh signaling centers participate in fungiform papilla and taste bud formation and maintenance. Dev Biol 382: 82–97.
57. SeymourPA, FreudeKK, TranMN, MayesEE, JensenJ, et al. (2007) SOX9 is required for maintenance of the pancreatic progenitor cell pool. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 1865–1870.
58. VidalVP, ChaboissierMC, LützkendorfS, CotsarelisG, MillP, et al. (2005) Sox9 is essential for outer root sheath differentiation and the formation of the hair stem cell compartment. Curr Biol 15: 1340–1351.
59. OgasawaraM, WadaH, PetersH, SatohN (1999) Developmental expression of Pax1/9 genes in urochordate and hemichordate gills: insight into function and evolution of the pharyngeal epithelium. Development 126: 2539–2550.
60. LinC, FisherAV, YinY, MaruyamaT, VeithGM, et al. (2011) The inductive role of Wnt-β-Catenin signaling in the formation of oral apparatus. Dev Biol 356: 40–50.
61. KistR, WatsonM, WangX, CairnsP, MilesC, et al. (2005) Reduction of Pax9 gene dosage in an allelic series of mouse mutants causes hypodontia and oligodontia. Hum Mol Genet 14: 3605–3617.
62. SorianoP (1999) Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain. Nat Genet 21: 70–71.
63. Bancroft JD (2002) Chapter 10: Mucins. In: Bancroft JD, Gamble M, editors. Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. 5 ed: Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier Science Limited. pp. 172–175.
64. GerberJK, RichterT, KremmerE, AdamskiJ, HöflerH, et al. (2002) Progressive loss of PAX9 expression correlates with increasing malignancy of dysplastic and cancerous epithelium of the human oesophagus. J Pathol 197: 293–297.
65. StoltCC, LommesP, SockE, ChaboissierMC, SchedlA, et al. (2003) The Sox9 transcription factor determines glial fate choice in the developing spinal cord. Genes Dev 17: 1677–1689.
66. SonnesenL, NoltingD, KjaerKW, KjaerI (2008) Association between the development of the body axis and the craniofacial skeleton studied by immunohistochemical analyses using collagen II, Pax9, Pax1, and Noggin antibodies. Spine 33: 1622–1626.
67. NakatomiM, WangXP, KeyD, LundJJ, Turbe-DoanA, et al. (2010) Genetic interactions between Pax9 and Msx1 regulate lip development and several stages of tooth morphogenesis. Dev Biol 340: 438–449.
68. ReicheltJ, BauerC, PorterR, LaneE, MaginV (1997) Out of balance: consequences of a partial keratin 10 knockout. J Cell Sci 110: 2175–2186.
69. MiuraH, KusakabeY, KatoH, Miura-OhnumaJ, TagamiM, et al. (2003) Co-expression pattern of Shh with Prox1 and that of Nkx2.2 with Mash1 in mouse taste bud. Gene Expr Patterns 3: 427–430.
70. MbieneJP, MaccallumDK, MistrettaCM (1997) Organ cultures of embryonic rat tongue support tongue and gustatory papilla morphogenesis in vitro without intact sensory ganglia. J Comp Neurol 377: 324–340.
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2014 Číslo 10
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- The Master Activator of IncA/C Conjugative Plasmids Stimulates Genomic Islands and Multidrug Resistance Dissemination
- A Splice Mutation in the Gene Causes High Glycogen Content and Low Meat Quality in Pig Skeletal Muscle
- Keratin 76 Is Required for Tight Junction Function and Maintenance of the Skin Barrier
- A Role for Taiman in Insect Metamorphosis