Dome-shaped macula in children and adolescents

English version

Autoři: Eunhae Shin ^aff001; Kyung-Ah Park ^aff001; Sei Yeul Oh ^aff001
Působiště autorů: Department of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea ^aff001
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 15(1)
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227292

Souhrn

Purpose

We sought to evaluate the incidence and characteristics of dome-shaped macula (DSM) in children and adolescents with myopia.

Methods

A retrospective review of medical records was performed to identify subjects who were younger than 19 years with myopia of −3.0 diopters or greater. The results of optical coherence tomography images were analyzed to identify DSM. The height and diameter of the dome were measured. Age, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and refractive error of study participants who exhibited DSM were compared with those of patients who did not.

Results

Among the 1,042 eyes of 615 patients, eight eyes (0.77%) of seven patients had DSM. Six of these eight eyes were not highly myopic (i.e., less than −6.0 diopters of spherical equivalents). Additionally, the mean height and diameter of the identified domes were 146.50 ± 42.33 μm and 4779.75 ± 699.38 μm, respectively. Patients with DSM were significantly older (mean age: 15.88 ± 2.36 years) than patients without it (11.51 ± 4.60 years; p = 0.007). The youngest affected patient was 11 years old. There was no significant difference in refractive errors (p = 0.629) or BCVA (p = 0.314) between the two groups.

Conclusions

Although the incidence in this study was very low, DSM was found even in children and adolescents. In addition, 75% of affected individuals were not highly myopic. These results suggest that inherent traits may be involved in development of DSM.

Klíčová slova:

Eyes – Tomography – Angiography – Adolescents – Visual acuity – Retinal detachment – Myopia – Choroid

Zdroje

1. Gaucher D, Erginay A, Lecleire-Collet A, Haouchine B, Puech M, Cohen S-Y, et al. Dome-shaped macula in eyes with myopic posterior staphyloma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(5):909–14. Epub 2008/03/14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.01.012 18342827.

2. Imamura Y, Iida T, Maruko I, Zweifel SA, Spaide RF. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of the sclera in dome-shaped macula. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(2):297–302. Epub 2010/12/03. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.08.014 21129729.

3. Coco RM, Sanabria MR, Alegria J. Pathology associated with optical coherence tomography macular bending due to either dome-shaped macula or inferior staphyloma in myopic patients. Ophthalmologica. 2012;228(1):7–12. Epub 2012/04/04. doi: 10.1159/000336910 22488163.

4. Liang IC, Shimada N, Tanaka Y, Nagaoka N, Moriyama M, Yoshida T, et al. Comparison of Clinical Features in Highly Myopic Eyes with and without a Dome-Shaped Macula. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(8):1591–600. Epub 2015/05/16. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.04.012 25986898.

5. Lorenzo D, Arias L, Choudhry N, Millan E, Flores I, Rubio MJ, et al. DOME-SHAPED MACULA IN MYOPIC EYES: Twelve-Month Follow-up. Retina. 2017;37(4):680–6. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001222 28333783.

6. Mehdizadeh M, Nowroozzadeh MH. Dome-shaped macula in eyes with myopic posterior staphyloma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(3):478–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.05.045 18724981.

7. Caillaux V, Gaucher D, Gualino V, Massin P, Tadayoni R, Gaudric A. Morphologic characterization of dome-shaped macula in myopic eyes with serous macular detachment. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156(5):958–67.e1. Epub 2013/08/20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.06.032 23972305.

8. Ellabban AA, Tsujikawa A, Matsumoto A, Yamashiro K, Oishi A, Ooto S, et al. Three-dimensional tomographic features of dome-shaped macula by swept-source optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155(2):320–8.e2. Epub 2012/11/03. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.08.007 23127750.

9. Ohsugi H, Ikuno Y, Oshima K, Yamauchi T, Tabuchi H. Morphologic characteristics of macular complications of a dome-shaped macula determined by swept-source optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(1):162–70.e1. Epub 2014/03/12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.02.054 24631474.

10. Errera MH, Michaelides M, Keane PA, Restori M, Paques M, Moore AT, et al. The extended clinical phenotype of dome-shaped macula. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252(3):499–508. Epub 2014/01/25. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2561-7 24464468.

11. Viola F, Dell'Arti L, Benatti E, Invernizzi A, Mapelli C, Ferrari F, et al. Choroidal findings in dome-shaped macula in highly myopic eyes: a longitudinal study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159(1):44–52. Epub 2014/09/22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.09.026 25244975.

12. Cebeci Z, Kir N. Bilateral Dome-Shaped Macula with Serous Macular Detachment in a Child. Case Rep Ophthalmol Med. 2015;2015:213968-. Epub 2015/06/01. doi: 10.1155/2015/213968 26124972.

13. Xu X, Fang Y, Jonas JB, Du R, Shinohara K, Tanaka N, et al. RIDGE-SHAPED MACULA IN YOUNG MYOPIC PATIENTS AND ITS DIFFERENTIATION FROM TYPICAL DOME-SHAPED MACULA IN ELDERLY MYOPIC PATIENTS. Retina. 2018: doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002395 30475289.

14. Pilotto E, Guidolin F, Parravano M, Viola F, De Geronimo D, Convento E, et al. MORPHOFUNCTIONAL EVALUATION IN DOME-SHAPED MACULA: A MICROPERIMETRY AND OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY STUDY. Retina. 2018;38(5):922–30. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001621 28538084.

15. García-Ben A, Kamal-Salah R, García-Basterra I, Gonzalez Gómez A, Morillo Sanchez MJ, García-Campos JM. Two- and three-dimensional topographic analysis of pathologically myopic eyes with dome-shaped macula and inferior staphyloma by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;255(5):903–12. Epub 2017/01/17. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3587-z 28097437.

16. Ellabban AA, Tsujikawa A, Muraoka Y, Yamashiro K, Oishi A, Ooto S, et al. Dome-shaped macular configuration: longitudinal changes in the sclera and choroid by swept-source optical coherence tomography over two years. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(5):1062–70. Epub 2014/08/12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.08.006 25124265.

17. Fang Y, Jonas JB, Yokoi T, Cao K, Shinohara K, Ohno-Matsui K. Macular Bruch's membrane defect and dome-shaped macula in high myopia. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0178998–e. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178998 28570624.

18. Byeon SH, Chu YK. Dome-shaped macula. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(6):1101–2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.01.054 21616212.

19. Soudier G, Gaudric A, Gualino V, Massin P, Nardin M, Tadayoni R, et al. Macular Choroidal Thickness in Myopic Eyes with and without a Dome-Shaped Macula: A Case-Control Study. Ophthalmologica. 2016;236(3):148–53. Epub 2016/10/14. doi: 10.1159/000450556 27736817.

20. Soudier G, Gaudric A, Gualino V, Massin P, Nardin M, Tadayoni R, et al., LONG-TERM EVOLUTION OF DOME-SHAPED MACULA: Increased Macular Bulge is Associated With Extended Macular Atrophy. Retina. 2016;36(5):944–52. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000806 26914992.

21. Saw S-M, Tong L, Chua W-H, Chia K-S, Koh D, Tan DTH, et al. Incidence and progression of myopia in Singaporean school children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(1):51–7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0565 15623754.