Effect of classroom intervention on student food selection and plate waste: Evidence from a randomized control trial
Autoři:
Dmytro Serebrennikov aff001; Bhagyashree Katare aff002; Lisa Kirkham aff003; Sara Schmitt aff004
Působiště autorů:
Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin, Ireland
aff001; Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States of America
aff002; Evaluation and Learning Research Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States of America
aff003; Human Development and Family Studies, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States of America
aff004
Vyšlo v časopise:
PLoS ONE 15(1)
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226181
Souhrn
Background
U.S. children are failing to meet the recommended daily 4 cups of fruits and vegetables. New federal guidelines were implemented for healthier school lunches for the National School Lunch Programs (NSLP). Consequently, students waste large amounts of fruits and vegetables. Several organizations advocate implementation of classroom nutrition education programs as a school nutrition policy.
Methods
We conducted a randomized control trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a classroom nutrition education on food consumption behavior of public elementary school students. Our intervention was designed to improve students’ preferences for fruits and vegetables. We collected data using digital-photography, and estimated the amount of fruits and vegetables selected and wasted using ordinary least squares.
Results
The nutrition education program had no impact on the amount of fruits and vegetables selected by the students in the treatment group. We also find no significant difference in the amount of fruits and vegetables wasted by students in the treatment and control group.
Conclusion
Nutrition education did not change students’ consumption behavior, implying the proposed policy might not be optimal. Inducing a behavioral change in elementary school students is an intricate process and might require more than classroom lessons to change their dietary habits.
Klíčová slova:
Teachers – Nutrition – Schools – Children – Photography – Habits – Food consumption – Vegetables
Zdroje
1. Auld GW, Romaniello C, Heimendinger J, Hambidge C, Hambidge M. Outcomes from a school-based nutrition education program using resource teachers and cross-disciplinary models. Journal of Nutrition Education. 1998; 30:268–280. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3182(98)70336-X
2. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. The United States, NJ, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc; 1986.
3. Banfield EC, Liu Y, Davis JS, Chang S, Frazier-Wood AC. Poor adherence to US dietary guidelines for children and adolescents in the national health and nutrition examination survey population. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2016; 116:21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.08.010 26391469
4. Blom-Hoffman J, Kelleher C, Power TJ, Leff SS. 2004. Promoting healthy food consumption among young children: Evaluation of a multi-component nutrition education program. Journal of School Psychology. 2004; 42:45–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2003.08.004
5. Concannon K. Nutrition standards in the national school lunch and school breakfast programs. Federal Registrar. 2012; 77:4088–4167.
6. Byker CJ, Pinard CA, Yaroch AL, Serrano EL. New NSLP guidelines: challenges and opportunities for nutrition education practitioners and researchers. Journal of Nutrition Education Behavior. 2013; 46:683–689. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2013.06.004 23886776
7. Amin SA, Yon BA, Taylor JC, Johnson RK. Impact of the National School Lunch Program on fruit and vegetable selection in northeastern elementary schoolchildren, 2012–2013. Public Health Reports. 2015; 130:453–7. doi: 10.1177/003335491513000508 26327723
8. Cohen JFW, Richardson S, Parker E, Catalano PJ, Rimm E.B. Impact of the new U.S. Department of Agriculture meal standards on food selection, consumption, and waste. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2014; 46:388–94. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.11.013 24650841
9. Byker C, Farris A, Marcenelle M, Davis G, Serrano E. Food waste in a school nutrition program after implementation of new lunch program guidelines. Journal of Nutrition Education Behavior. 2014; 46:406–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2014.03.009 24857599
10. US Department of Agriculture. United States 2030 Food Loss and Waste Reduction Goal. 2015; c2019 [cited 2019 Sep 26] https://www.epa.gov/sustainable-management-food/united-states-2030-food-loss-and-waste-reduction-goal#goal.
11. Fox MK, Gearan E, Cannon J, Briefel R, Deming DM, Eldridge AL et al. Usual food intakes of 2-and 3-year old US children are not consistent with dietary guidelines. BMC Nutrition. 2016; 2:67. doi: 10.1186/s40795-016-0106-2
12. Hall E, Chai W, Albrecht J.A. Relationships between nutrition-related knowledge, self-efficacy, and behavior for fifth grade students attending Title I and non-Title I schools. Appetite. 2016; 96:245–253. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.033 26431680
13. Hanks AS, Wansink B, Just DR. Reliability and accuracy of real-time visualization techniques for measuring school cafeteria tray waste: validating the quarter-waste method. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2014; 114: 470–474. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.08.013 24135053
14. Appleton KM, Hemingway A, Saulais L. et al. Increasing vegetable intakes: rationale and systematic review of published interventions. European Journal of Nutrition. 2016; 55: 869. doi: 10.1007/s00394-015-1130-8 26754302
15. Scherr RE, Linnell JD, Dharmar M, Beccarelli LM, Bergman JJ, Briggs M et al. A multicomponent, school-based intervention, the Shaping Healthy Choices Program, improves nutrition-related outcomes. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. 2017; 49:368–379. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2016.12.007 28189500
16. Epstein-Solfield A, Arango C, Ogan D, Stendell-Hollis N. The effects of a nutrition education intervention on third- and fifth grade students’ fruit and vegetable knowledge, preference and consumption. Journal of Child Nutrition and Management. 2018; 42(1).
17. Briggs M, Safaii S, Beall DL. Position of the American Dietetic Association, Society for Nutrition Education, and American School Food Service Association-Nutrition services: an essential component of comprehensive school health programs. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2003; 103:505–514. doi: 10.1053/jada.2003.50100 12669016
18. Krebs-Smith SM, Guenther PM, Subar AF, Kirkpatrick SI, Dodd KW. Americans do not meet federal dietary recommendations. The Journal of Nutrition. 2010; 140:1832–1838. doi: 10.3945/jn.110.124826 20702750
19. Matvienko O. Impact of a nutrition education curriculum on snack choices of children ages six and seven years. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. 2007; 39:281–285. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2007.01.004 17826348
20. McAleese JD, Rankin LL. Garden-based nutrition education affects fruit and vegetable consumption in sixth-grade adolescents. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2007; 107:662–665. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.01.015 17383272
21. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. 2014. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2014; 311:806–814. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.732 24570244
22. Parmer SM, Salisbury-Glennon J, Shannon D, Struempler B. 2009. School gardens: an experiential learning approach for a nutrition education program to increase fruit and vegetable knowledge, preference, and consumption among second-grade students. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. 2009; 41:212–217. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2008.06.002 19411056
23. Perry CL, Bishop DB, Taylor G, Murray DM, Mays RW, Dudovitz BS et al. 1998. Changing fruit and vegetable consumption among children: the 5-a-Day Power Plus program in St. Paul, Minnesota. American Journal of Public Health. 1998; 88:603–609. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.4.603 9551002
24. Powers AR, Struempler BJ, Guarino A, Parmer SM. Effects of a nutrition education program on the dietary behavior and nutrition knowledge of second‐grade and third‐grade students. Journal of School Health. 2005; 75:129–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2005.00010.x 15987006
25. Prelip MJ, Kinsler C, Le Thai JT, Erausquin Slusser W. Evaluation of a school-based multicomponent nutrition education program to improve young children's fruit and vegetable consumption. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. 2012; 44:310–318. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.10.005 22578965
26. Quah SR. The health belief model and preventive health behavior in Singapore. Social Science and Medicine. 1985; 21: 351–363. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90112-1 4035424
27. Swanson M. Digital photography as a tool to measure school cafeteria consumption. Journal of School Health. 2008; 78:432–437. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00326.x 18651930
28. Taylor JC, Yon BA, Johnson RK. Reliability and validity of digital imaging as a measure of schoolchildren's fruit and vegetable consumption. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2014; 114:1359–1366. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.02.029 24751663
29. Domel SB, Baranowski T, Davis H, Thompson WO, Leonard SB, Riley P et al. Development and evaluation of a school intervention to increase fruit and vegetable consumption among 4th and 5th grade students. Journal of Nutrition Education. 1993; 25:345–349. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3182(12)80224-x
30. Struempler BJ, Parmer SM, Mastropietro LM, Arsiwalla D, Bubb RR. Changes in fruit and vegetable consumption of third-grade students in body quest: food of the warrior, a 17-class childhood obesity prevention program. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. 2014; 46:286–292. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2014.03.001 24767729
31. Hersch D, Perdue L, Ambroz T, Boucher JL. The impact of cooking classes on food-related preference, attitudes, and behaviors of school-aged children: A systematic review of the evidence, 2003–2014. Preventing Chronic Desease. 2014; 11:1–10. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.140267 25376015
32. Lakkakula A, Geaghan J, Zanovec M, Pierce S, Tuuri G. 2010. Repeated taste exposure increases liking for vegetables by low-income elementary school children. Appetite. 2010; 55 (2): 226–231. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.06.003 20541572
33. Just D, and Price J. 2013. Default options, incentives and food choices: evidence from elementary-school children. Public Health Nutrition. 2013; 16:2281–2288. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013001468 23711192
34. US Department of Health and Human Services and US Department of Agriculture. 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.c2019 [cited 2019 Jan 2018]. https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines.
Článok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS One
2020 Číslo 1
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Masturbační chování žen v ČR − dotazníková studie
- Nejasný stín na plicích – kazuistika
- Těžké menstruační krvácení může značit poruchu krevní srážlivosti. Jaký management vyšetření a léčby je v takovém případě vhodný?
- Metformin zlepšuje u žen se syndromem polycystických ovarií pravidelnost menstruačního cyklu i hormonální a metabolický profil
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Psychometric validation of Czech version of the Sport Motivation Scale
- Comparison of Monocyte Distribution Width (MDW) and Procalcitonin for early recognition of sepsis
- Effects of supplemental creatine and guanidinoacetic acid on spatial memory and the brain of weaned Yucatan miniature pigs
- Accelerated sparsity based reconstruction of compressively sensed multichannel EEG signals