Evaluation of bacteriophage as an adjunct therapy for treatment of peri-prosthetic joint infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus
Authors:
Jodie L. Morris aff001; Hayley L. Letson aff002; Lisa Elliott aff003; Andrea L. Grant aff001; Matthew Wilkinson aff001; Kaushik Hazratwala aff001; Peter McEwen aff001
Authors place of work:
Orthopaedic Research Institute of Queensland, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
aff001; College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia
aff002; AusPhage Pty Ltd, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
aff003
Published in the journal:
PLoS ONE 14(12)
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226574
Summary
Phage therapy offers a potential alternate strategy for the treatment of peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI), particularly where limited effective antibiotics are available. We undertook preclinical trials to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of a phage cocktail, alone and in combination with vancomycin, to reduce bacterial numbers within the infected joint using a clinically-relevant model of Staphylococcus aureus-induced PJI. Infected animals were randomised to 4 treatment groups, with treatment commencing 21-days post-surgery: bacteriophage alone, vancomycin alone, bacteriophage and vancomycin, and sham. At day 28 post-surgery, animals were euthanised for microbiological and immunological assessment of implanted joints. Treatment with phage alone or vancomycin alone, led to 5-fold and 6.2-fold reductions, respectively in bacterial load within peri-implant tissue compared to sham-treated animals. Compared to sham-treated animals, a 22.5-fold reduction in S. aureus burden was observed within joint tissue of animals that were administered phage in combination with vancomycin, corresponding with decreased swelling in the implanted knee. Microbiological data were supported by evidence of decreased inflammation within the joints of animals administered phage in combination with vancomycin, compared to sham-treated animals. Our findings provide further support for phage therapy as a tolerable and effective adjunct treatment for PJI.
Keywords:
inflammation – Staphylococcus aureus – Bacteriophages – Skeletal joints – Knee joints – Vancomycin – Titanium implants
Introduction
Bacteriophage, or phages, are naturally occurring, obligate predators of bacteria that were discovered in the early 20th century [1]. Phage safety in humans is well documented with phage therapy used in Eastern Europe for almost a century for the treatment of acute and chronic bacterial infections [2–4]. The continued and rapid global emergence of antibiotic resistance due to overuse and misuse prompted the recent World Health Organisation warning of this silent pandemic and its imminent dire implications without immediate changes to antimicrobial stewardship and identification of alternative treatment strategies [5]. Consideration of phages as an alternate therapeutic approach for difficult to treat bacterial infections, including osteomyelitis, has renewed over the past decade with an increase in the number of published case reports of successful clinical outcomes following phage therapy [6, 7] and a small number of clinical trials completed, or in progress, in the USA, United Kingdom and Australia (https://anzctr.org.au/, https://clinicaltrials.gov/, and https://globalclinicaltrialdata.com/) [3, 7]. Nonetheless, statistical evidence of phage therapy efficacy has been inconsistent with clinical trials completed to date, prompting calls for continued translational research efforts in this field so as to guide effective clinical practice in future [7].
Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains the leading cause for revision surgery, with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) the bacterium most frequently responsible [8–10]. S. aureus biofilm formation is a key component in the virulence armamentarium of this bacterium in the pathogenesis of PJI. Bio-inert orthopaedic materials such as titanium provide habitable substrates for biofilm formation, a growth state which serves to facilitate bacterial survival in hostile environments [11, 12]. Not only does the structure of the biofilm limit the penetration of antibiotics and immune mediators, but recalcitrance to treatment is also driven by altered metabolic phenotype of bacterial cells within the biofilm matrix [12–14]. Consequently, current surgical and antibiotic management strategies for PJI are not only costly and traumatic for the patient, but also associated with considerable morbidity and mortality with failure rates of 14.8% to 25% [8, 15–17].
In contrast to antibiotics which decrease in concentration below the surface of bacterial biofilms, phages are capable of penetrating biofilms and self-replicating [2]. To overcome potential limitations arising from the high phage specificity, phage cocktails have been used to broaden the spectrum of activity [2, 18, 19]. Recently, a French case series was published describing the successful treatment of PJI caused by S. aureus with phages in combination with antibiotics [18]. However, while the application of phages for the treatment of bone and joint infections appears promising, detailed preclinical and clinical studies to evaluate their in vivo efficacy are lacking. To our knowledge, there have been no preclinical studies using models that are clinically representative of TKA to investigate phage as an adjunct therapy for PJI caused by S. aureus.
Proof-of-principle in vitro studies demonstrated potential application of a lytic phage cocktail to reduce S. aureus numbers within biofilms growing on custom 3D-printed, miniaturized porous titanium implants, a material commonly used in the manufacture of orthopaedic implants [20]. Using the same titanium implants and additional biomaterials employed in modern TKA, a novel rat model of S. aureus biofilm-associated PJI was also recently characterised [21]. The aim of the current study was to compare the in vivo efficacy of single or combination therapy using a bacteriophage cocktail and vancomycin for reducing S. aureus burden within the implanted knee of the rat model of S. aureus biofilm-associated PJI. We hypothesised that S. aureus burden will be reduced in peri-implant tissue from animals receiving bacteriophage therapy, and that combination therapy with bacteriophage and vancomycin will further reduce bacterial load.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
The care and use of all animals in this study was in strict accordance to the National Health and Medical Research Council Australian Code for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes. All animal experimental procedures were approved by the James Cook University Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (A2326). Surgeries were performed under isoflurane anaesthesia and animal sacrifice was performed by pentobarbital (100 mg/kg) overdose at designated end-points.
Microorganism and antimicrobial agents
A previously described MSSA clinical isolate, ORI16_C02N, recovered from a patient with delayed-onset PJI following TKA was used in the current study [20]. A single stock preparation was cultured overnight in tryptic soya broth (TSB), and stored in multiple, snap-frozen aliquots at -80°C. Aliquots from this master stock were used for all animal infection experiments. Sterile titanium implants were pre-seeded with S. aureus under in vitro conditions prior to implantation into rat femurs, as described previously [21]. The mean bacterial density on each implant at the time of surgery (day 0) was 1.2 x106 CFU (range, 8.9 x 105–1.9 x 106 CFU).
Five lytic S. aureus-specific phages (StaPh_1, StaPh_3, StaPh_4, StaPh_11 and StaPh_16) of the family, Myoviridae, were used to prepare the StaPhage cocktail for the current study [20]. In vitro spot tests were performed to confirm bactericidal activity of each phage toward OR16_C02N [20]. Individual phage suspensions contained 1 x 109−12 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL and were stored at 4°C, with titres and sterility confirmed prior to each use. For preparation of StaPhage cocktail, individual phage preparations were adjusted 5 x 108 PFU/mL in sterile 0.9% saline, then combined at equal volumes to achieve a cocktail containing 2.5 x 109 PFU/mL. StaPhage cocktail was prepared immediately prior to administration to animals.
Vancomycin powder (Alphapharm, Sydney, Australia) was dissolved in sterile water and administered intraperitoneally at a dose of 50 mg/kg, as described below. The sensitivity of OR16_C02N to vancomycin was confirmed by the epsilometer (Etest) method (BioMérieux, Norwest, Australia) prior to the experiment (minimum inhibitory concentration, MIC 1.8 μg/mL).
Animals
Conventional, twenty-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 47, 360 to 480 g) were used. Animals were individually caged, fed a standard pellet diet and provided water ad libitum. After a 7-day acclimation period, knee implant surgery was performed on rats under isoflurane anaesthesia using surgical techniques and materials, as described previously [21]. Surgeries were performed on 10 to 12 animals per surgery day. Prior to each surgery day, animals were randomised to a treatment group, with equal numbers of animals per treatment group for each surgery date. The order of animals undergoing surgery on each surgery day was also randomised. Briefly, a UHXLPE implant was seated in a small mantle of gentamicin-laden bone cement (Heraeus Palacos® R+G, Zimmer Biomet, Sydney, Australia) within the proximal tibia. A titanium implant, pre-seeded with S. aureus, was press-fit into a defect created in the distal femur. Following implantation, the patella was repositioned, and the capsule and skin closed. Immediately after skin closure and prior to recovery from anaesthesia, animals received pre-emptive analgesic consisting of a 0.05 mg/kg subcutaneous injection of buprenorphine (Temgesic®) in a 1mL bolus of saline. Post-operative analgesic (buprenorphine, 0.01–0.05 mg/kg) was administered at 6 and 12 hrs post-surgery, with analgesic administered 12 hourly thereafter, according to pain scores of individual animals. Clinical signs including body weight, temperature and weight-bearing activity were monitored daily throughout the experimental period. Establishment of infection was confirmed by differential white blood cell at day 5 post-surgery (S1 Table) [21]. Animals were sacrificed at 28 days post-surgery (7 days after commencing treatment) with an overdose of pentobarbital (100 mg/kg) for gross pathology, haematology, microbiology, inflammatory, and histological evaluation. All animal experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (A2326).
Treatment
At commencement of the 7-day acclimation period prior to surgery, animals were randomised to the following treatment groups: no treatment (Sham, n = 12), phage alone (Ph, n = 12), vancomycin alone (V, n = 11), phage plus vancomycin (Ph+V, n = 12) (Fig 1). Normal (0.9%) sterile saline was administered to sham-treated controls via the intraperitoneal (i.p.) route on day 21, 22 and 23 post-surgery. StaPhage cocktail (1.3 x 108 PFU; multiplicity of infection (MOI), > 104 PFU:1 CFU) was administered via the i.p. route on day 21, 22 and 23 post-surgery. Vancomycin (50 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered from day 21 to 27 post-surgery every 12 h [22–24]. Animals receiving combination therapy were administered phage and vancomycin in accordance with the single therapy regimens.
Haematology and inflammatory assessments
Blood was collected under anaesthesia via the lateral tail vein during the experimental period and via terminal cardiac puncture at day 28 post-surgery (Fig 1). Complete blood cell examination (CBE) was carried out using an automated ACT Diff analyser (Beckman Coulter, Brea CA, USA). Blood samples were centrifuged, and plasma collected and stored at -80°C until analysis. C-reactive protein (CRP) was measured in plasma using a Rat C-reactive protein ELISA (BD Biosciences, North Ryde, Australia) and calprotectin was measured in joint tissue homogenates using a Rat Calprotectin ELISA (Cusabio, Houston, TX, USA), according to manufacturer protocols. Inflammatory chemokines and cytokines (MCP-1, GRO/KC, MIP-2, TNF-a, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-12p70, IFN-g, IL-4, IL-10) were measured in plasma and joint tissue homogenates using Milliplex® Rat Cytokine/Chemokine Magnetic Bead Panel (RECYTMAG-65K, Lot #3070574 and #2927420, Abacus ALS, Meadowbrook, Queensland) in combination with the Magpix® analyser (Luminex Corporation, Austin, Texas, USA). Assays were carried out according to manufacturer’s instructions with samples measured in duplicate.
Microbiological analyses
Bacterial loads were determined in blood, tissues and implants from animals at day 28 post-surgery, using methods described previously [21]. Briefly, liver, spleen, popliteal and inguinal (draining) lymph nodes of the operated (right leg) and non-operated (left leg) limb were dissected aseptically and weighed. The operated limb was also removed at the hip and soft tissue dissected from the femur and tibia. Bone cuts were made approximately 2.5 cm proximal to knee on femur and 2.5 cm distal on tibia. Titanium and UHXLPE implants were removed and sonicated as described previously Lytic bacteriophages replicate within a specific host bacterium causing lysis and death of the bacterial cell and release of phage progeny which perpetuate the cycle as long as live bacterial target cells are present., with UHXLPE implants removed from bone cement mantles prior to sonicating. After removal of implants, distal femur and proximal tibia pieces were weighed, pulverised and homogenised in sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2) [21]. In consideration of the potential for inadvertent haematogenous seeding of implants by respiratory or gut flora following surgical stress in the animals, tissue homogenates and implant sonicates were serially diluted in sterile PBS and cultured in triplicate on both selective (mannitol salt agar, MSA) and non-selective (tryptic soy agar, TSA) agar overnight to assess purity and to observe any phenotypic changes in colony morphology of the S. aureus isolates recovered from the infected joints. The limit of detection for viable counts was <5 CFU. Data is expressed as mean log10 CFU/total tissue or mean log10 CFU, as indicated.
Antimicrobial sensitivity
Vancomycin and StaPhage sensitivity was determined for S. aureus (5–10 colonies) recovered from femur and titanium implants of treated and untreated animals at day 28 post-surgery. The susceptibility of the stock (pre-implantation) strain of ORI16-02N and isolates recovered from animals (n = 8 animals per treatment group) toward the individual phages and the StaPhage cocktail was tested using standard spot tests, as described previously [20]. Briefly colonies were recovered from TSA with a sterile cotton-tip swab, suspended in sterile TSB with 20% glycerol (v/v) and aliquots snap-frozen at -80°C. To assess antimicrobial sensitivity, single-use aliquots were thawed, diluted in sterile TSB (1:5) and grown to log-phase (3 h, 37°C, 100 rpm) prior to preparation of bacterial lawns on TSA. Bacterial sensitivity to phage was considered where confluent, semi-confluent, opaque lysis or individual plaques were observed in the bacterial lawn. A semi-quantitative scoring system (S1 Fig) was used to enable comparison of phage sensitivity between isolates where: 0 = no plaques, 1 = < 10 individual plaques, 2 = 11–100 individual plaques, 3 = partial clearing, >100 plaques, 4 = clearing with several distinct bacterial colonies within the clearance zone, 5 = complete clearing. Vancomycin susceptibility of S. aureus recovered from femur and titanium implants was compared to the pre-implantation S. aureus strain using the Etest method, and according to manufacturer protocols.
Statistics
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism for Mac software (version 7). Data normality was assessed using Shapiro-Wilks test, with Levene’s test used to determine equality of variances. Non-normally distributed data was compared using a Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s post-hoc analysis. Changes in haematology parameters between groups were compared using two-way repeated measures ANOVA, with Holm-Sidak post-hoc analysis. Within group differences were analysed with repeated measures ANOVA with Dunnet’s post-hoc analysis. MILLIPLEX Analyst 5.1 software (Luminex Corporation, Austin, Texas, USA) was used to determine cytokine and chemokine concentrations with a 5-parametric logistic weighted curve fit. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) unless otherwise stated, with significance set at P < 0.05.
Results
Clinical outcomes
All animals survived surgery and the postoperative period with no signs of systemic illness. Administration of analgesic was ceased by day 5 post-surgery for all animals based on improved clinical scores. Body temperature increased significantly between baseline and day 5 post-surgery for all animals, though levels remained within normal ranges throughout the experimental period with no discernible effects of treatment on body temperature (S1 Table) [21]. Animals were able to bear partial weight within 48 h of surgery. The median time to full weight bear was 18 days post-surgery, with 12 of 47 animals not returning to full weight-bearing within the 28-day experimental period. No significant difference was observed in the time for sham-treated animals (median 21 d, range 10–28 d), or animals treated with phage alone (median 18 d, range 13–28 d), vancomycin alone (median 17 d, range 11–28 d) or combined phage and vancomycin (median 18 d, range 11–28 d) to return to full weight bearing following surgery.
Minor weight loss was observed for all animals in the first week following surgery, however body weight increased thereafter (S1 Table). Compared to sham-treated controls, body weight was significantly lower in animals treated with phage alone, vancomycin alone and phage plus vancomycin at day 28 post-surgery, despite comparable pre-treatment weights at day 20 post-surgery (S1 Table).
Haematology and systemic inflammation
There were no statistically significant differences in haematology parameters between treatment groups at baseline, or throughout the experimental period (S1 Table). While significant changes were observed in erythrocyte, leucocyte and platelet parameters for all animals following surgery, numbers tended to return to pre-surgical levels by the end of the experimental period, consistent with previous findings in this infection model [21]. Establishment of infection was confirmed for all animals by a significant increase in the percentage of neutrophils at day 5 post-surgery as previously described [21]. Similarly, plasma CRP concentrations were significantly increased at day 5 post-surgery for all animals, though concentrations returned to baseline levels by day 20 post-surgery and were comparable between treatment groups at day 28 post-surgery (S1 Table). Plasma lactate concentrations (indirect marker of tissue hypoxia) were significantly increased at day 28 post-surgery compared to pre-surgical levels for all treatment groups however, no significant between-group differences observed (S1 Table).
Plasma inflammatory chemokine and cytokine levels were comparable between treatment groups at day 28 post-surgery (7 days after commencing treatment; Fig 2). TNF-a and IFN-g levels remained below the assay limit of detection for all animals (<2.4 pg/ml and <14.6 pg/ml, respectively). No significant differences were observed between sham-treated and phage-treated animals for any of the inflammatory mediators measured at day 28 post-surgery. Compared to sham-treated animals, plasma IL-10 levels were significantly higher in animals treated with vancomycin alone and combined phage and vancomycin at day 28 post-surgery (p = 0.04 and p = 0.001, respectively; Fig 2E). Similarly, MCP-1 levels were significantly elevated in plasma from vancomycin-treated animals compared to sham-treated controls (p = 0.018; Fig 2A). No significant differences were observed in IL-6, IL-1ß and IL-4 concentrations in plasma of vancomycin-treated and phage plus vancomycin-treated animals at day 28 post-surgery compared to sham-treated controls (Fig 2B, 2C and 2F).
Joint swelling and pathology
Surgical incisions healed without complication in all animals. Joint circumferences of implanted knees were comparable between sham-treated, phage-treated and vancomycin-treated animals (Fig 3A). Compared to treatment with phage alone, the joint circumference of implanted knees was significantly less for animals receiving combination therapy (p = 0.016; Fig 3A). Upon dissection, macroscopic examination of the operated knees of animals at day 28 post-surgery revealed mild to severe soft tissue and articular cartilage damage, often in combination with increased amount and viscosity of synovial fluid (Fig 3B). A numerical scoring system was used for semi-quantitative evaluation of gross pathology within operated joints of animals at day 28 post-surgery, where 1 = mild soft tissue and articular cartilage damage and the absence of synovial effusion; 2 = moderate soft tissue changes, synovial thickening, occasional focal damage to articular cartilage with synovial effusion; and 3 = severe and extensive soft tissue damage, synovial thickening, articular cartilage damage and synovial effusion with Baker’s cyst (Fig 3B). No significant differences were observed in joint pathology between treatment groups, though there was a trend for reduced tissue damage within joints from animals that received combination therapy (p = 0.13; Fig 3C).
Joint bacterial loads
Seven days after commencement of antimicrobial therapy, peri-implant joint tissue (femur, tibia, patella and associated tendons, joint capsule tissues) and implants (titanium, UHXLPE) were harvested for enumeration of bacteria (Fig 4, Table 1). Peri-implant tissue weights were comparable between sham-treated (3.0 ± 0.5 g), and phage alone (3.0 ± 0.4 g), vancomycin alone (2.9 ± 0.3 g), and phage plus vancomycin (2.8 ± 0.4 g) treated animals (p = 0.632). Sham-treated animals had 8.1 x 104 ± 2 x 105 CFU (range, 8 x 101–7 x 105 CFU) in peri-implant joint tissue, and 3.7 x 104 ± 9.4 x 104 CFU (range, 1.5 x 102–3.3 x 105 CFU) recovered from titanium implants (12 of 12 animals). Treatment with phage alone resulted in 1.6 x 104 ± 2.9 x 104 CFU (p = 0.100; 5-fold reduction; range, 0–8 x 104 CFU) in peri-implant tissue and 6 x 103 ± 1 x 104 CFU (p = 0.947; 6.2-fold reduction; range, 1.2 x 102–3.7 x 104 CFU) from titanium implants. Animals treated with vancomycin alone had 1.3 x 104 ± 1.9 x 104 CFU from peri-implant tissue (p = 0.235; 6.2-fold reduction; range, 0–5.5 x 104 CFU) and 1.9 x 104 ± 5.2 x 104 CFU from titanium implants (p = 0.921; 1.9-fold reduction; range, 2.3 x 102–1.8 x 105 CFU). Combination therapy with phage and vancomycin significantly reduced S. aureus numbers to 3.6 x 103 ± 5.8 x 103 CFU (p = 0.014; 22.5-fold reduction; range, 0–1.6 x 104 CFU) in peri-implant tissue. However, mean bacterial load on titanium implants was comparable to those in sham-treated animals (p = 0.852; 3.7 x 104 ± 6.1 x 104 CFU; range, 4.1 x 101–1.6 x 105 CFU). S. aureus was recovered from sonicated UHXLPE implants in sham-treated (4 of 12), phage alone (4 of 12), vancomycin alone (5 of 11), and phage plus vancomycin combination therapy (3 of 12). No significant differences were observed between mean bacterial numbers recovered from UHXLPE implants between treatment groups though numbers tended to be lower from animals treated with phage plus vancomycin, compared to sham-treated control animals (p = 0.365, Fig 4C; Sham, 2.7 x 102 ± 9.1 x 102 CFU v Ph+V, 4.4 x 100 ± 8.8 x 100 CFU).
S. aureus was recovered from the femur (12 of 12), tibia (10 of 12), patella and associated tendons and capsular tissue (9 of 12) of sham-treated animals at day 28 post-surgery (Table 1). In contrast, compared with sham-treatment, fewer animals were positive for S. aureus in tibia (ns, p = 0.098; 1.8-fold decrease), patella and joint soft tissue (p = 0.025; 4-fold decrease) following combination-therapy (Table 1).
Effect of antimicrobial therapy on local inflammatory responses
Joint tissue concentration of calprotectin, an indirect marker of neutrophil infiltration, was comparable between sham-treated and single and combination therapy groups at day 28 post-surgery (Fig 5A). No significant differences were observed between sham-treated and phage alone treated animals for any of the inflammatory markers assayed. Compared to sham-treated animals and animals treated with phage alone, MCP-1 was significantly lower in joint tissue of animals treated with phage plus vancomycin at sacrifice (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0002 respectively; Fig 5B). While differences were not statistically significant, there was a trend for decreased concentrations of MCP-1 in joint tissue from vancomycin alone treated animals (p = 0.06). Concentrations of TNF-a, IL-1ß, IL-6 and IL-4 were comparable between sham-treated, phage alone, vancomycin alone and phage plus vancomycin treatment groups (Fig 5C, 5D, 5E and 5I). Compared to sham-treated and animals treated with phage alone, significantly increased IL-12p70 (p = 0.033 and p = 0.003, respectively), IFN-g (p = 0.007 and p = 0.008, respectively) and IL-10 (p = 0.004 and p = 0.002) levels were measured in joint tissue from animals treated with vancomycin alone (Fig 5F, 5G and 5H).
Development of antimicrobial resistance
Phage sensitivity was assessed to determine whether isolates recovered from the femur and excised titanium implants of animals (n = 8 per treatment group) at day 28 post-surgery were as susceptible as the original pre-inoculating S. aureus strain (S2 Table). StaPhage cocktail sensitivity of all S. aureus strains recovered from bone and titanium implants was comparable to that of the original, pre-implantation strain. However, screening of individual phage preparations identified phage-resistant colonies for isolates recovered from the femur of animals treated with phage alone, compared to the original S. aureus strain for StaPh_4, StaPh_11, and StaPh_16 (S2 Table). StaPh_1- and StaPh_3-resistant colonies were also observed for isolates recovered from bone and implants of sham-treated animals and animals that had been treated with vancomycin alone or phage plus vancomycin, respectively (S2 Table). No significant differences were observed in the sensitivity of S. aureus isolates from sham-treated and phage alone-treated animals toward StaPhage cocktail (p = 0.608), StaPh_1 (p > 0.999), StaPh_3 (p = 0.315), StaPh_4 (p = 0.132), StaPh_11 (p > 0.999), StaPh_16 (p > 0.999) (S2 Table). Within each treatment group, there was also no significant difference in phage sensitivity between strains recovered from bone and those from the titanium implant (S2 Table).
Vancomycin susceptibility of bacterial isolates recovered from the peri-implant tissue of the femur and the titanium implants of sham-treated animals (n = 8) and animals treated with phage alone (n = 7), vancomycin alone (n = 7) or phage plus vancomycin (n = 7) at day 28 post-surgery was compared to the inoculating strain of S. aureus (Fig 6). The MIC for ORI-16C02N (n = 5 independent tests) prior to implantation in the rat model of PJI was 1.8 μg/ml. The MIC for the majority of S. aureus isolates recovered from peri-implant tissue of sham-treated (p = 0.008), and animals treated with vancomycin alone (p = 0.02) and phage plus vancomycin (p = 0.03) were significantly higher than pre-infection levels. Similarly, significantly increased MICs were observed for S. aureus isolates recovered from titanium implants of sham-treated (p = 0.02), and animals treated with vancomycin alone (p = 0.02) and phage plus vancomycin (p = 0.03) compared to pre-infection levels. However, no significant differences were observed between vancomycin susceptibility of isolates from treated and untreated animals. Furthermore, in vitro vancomycin sensitivities were comparable between isolates recovered from peri-implant tissue and the surface of titanium implants within each treatment group (Fig 6).
Discussion
As a looming post-antibiotic era threatens to undo a century of infectious diseases advancements, increasing consideration is once again being given to phages as an alternative approach for treating bacterial infections [3, 5]. Lytic bacteriophages replicate within a specific host bacterium causing lysis and death of the bacterial cell and release of phage progeny which perpetuate the cycle as long as live bacterial target cells are present. Due to the absence of cytotoxic effects toward mammalian cells, their high specificity, and their ability to infect bacterial cells within biofilms, phages could potentially be used as an adjunct to antibiotics for treatment of biofilm-associated PJI, although to date, preclinical studies evaluating their in vivo efficacy have been lacking [1–3, 18, 25]. Using a clinically-relevant rat model of S. aureus biofilm-associated PJI following TKA, we show several key findings in the present study. Firstly, the combination of phages with vancomycin exerted a significantly increased therapeutic benefit compared to single therapy. Secondly, phage therapy alone tended to reduce bacterial burden within joint tissue and on the titanium implant of the infected knee within one week of commencing treatment, though this did not reach statistical significance. Thirdly, no adverse local or systemic inflammatory effects were observed following administration of several doses of relatively high numbers of lytic phages. Finally, S. aureus isolates recovered from the infected knee of animals that received phage therapy remained susceptible to the five-phage cocktail.
The model used in the present study is clinically representative of delayed-onset PJI, where implant-associated biofilms and progressive inflammatory responses and tissue remodelling occur in peri-implant tissue over a period of weeks following surgery [21]. Though demanding, it is an appropriate translational model for evaluating in vivo antimicrobial efficacy against biofilm-associated PJI. Our data support synergism between phages and vancomycin, leading to significantly reduced bacterial burden within joint tissue within 7 days of commencing treatment. While not statistically significant, the trend observed for decreased bacterial numbers on titanium implants from animals exposed to phage alone may hold clinical significance. Immune cell infiltration was not directly measured in the present study however, levels of IFN-g, IL-12p70 and IL-10 in joint tissue of animals treated with vancomycin alone were significantly higher than in sham- and phage alone-treated animals, suggesting that bacterial reduction observed in this group was associated with increased activation of cell-mediated immune responses. In contrast, the similarities between calprotectin (indirect marker of neutrophil infiltration) and inflammatory mediator concentrations within peri-implant tissue from sham- and phage alone-treated animals suggests the reduction in bacterial load is directly attributed to bactericidal activity of phages, rather than immune activation per se.
Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in rodents have previously been described [26], and the dose used in the present study is sufficient to significantly reduce S. aureus numbers in experimental models of chronic osteomyelitis [22–24]. There is currently no standard regimen for phage administration for treatment of PJI. Previous experimental studies evaluating phage therapy for osteomyelitis have used doses of 107−109 PFU administered daily for 3 to 8 days [19, 27, 28]. We therefore chose to administer over 3 consecutive days, using a phage cocktail containing a high dose of phage (>108 PFU). However, the effectiveness of phage therapy is dependent on the phage reaching the site of infection. Difficulties with eradication of chronic PJI arise due to poor vascular perfusion of ischaemic bone, the accumulation of peri-implant necrotic and fibrotic tissue and formation of sequestra which impede penetration of antimicrobials to the implant-associated biofilm [21, 29, 30]. It is possible that an extended therapeutic regimen may have led to further reduction in bacterial burden. The mechanisms underlying phage-antibiotic synergy and how these interactions evolve during the course of therapy and influence clinical outcome remains an area of active investigation [3, 31].
In vivo persistence of phages at day 28 post-surgery (4 days after final administration of phage cocktail) was confirmed in representative animals treated with phage and vancomycin (Ph+V, n = 5) by standard spot tests with 10-fold dilutions of femur homogenates onto confluent growth of the propagating strains of S. aureus (AP029 and AP030) for the lytic phages used in the study [32]. Further support for phage accumulation and replication within the infected knee following i.p. administration is provided by the high phage doses administered, the reduction in joint tissue bacterial loads 7 days after administration of phages, and the absence of significant local inflammatory responses compared to administration of vancomycin alone. Phage replication and in vivo persistence following systemic administration with doses comparable to those used in the current study has also been well-documented [2, 33]. However, we acknowledge that there may be differences in the proportion of each of the individual phage preparations reaching the site of infection, and the contribution of each in reducing S. aureus numbers.
Scheduling is an important consideration for phage therapy, particularly in relation to the impact on innate and adaptive immune responses [34, 35]. Whilst phages cannot infect nor replicate within eukaryotic cells, they do interact and influence eukaryotic cell activity, including immune cells. Opsonisation of bacteria with phages for example, has been shown to increase bacterial uptake by phagocytes [34, 36]. Strategies to improve the in vivo persistence of phages following systemic delivery are actively being investigated and include encapsulation with polymeric microparticles and liposomes [4, 36]. Administration of phages by alternate routes, including oral, aerosol and perioperative delivery has also shown to be effective for treatment of chronic bacterial infections [7]. Further studies to elucidate the optimal approach for phage administration and the mechanisms underlying the success or failure of phage therapy for biofilm-associated PJI are warranted.
The potential emergence of phage-resistant variants following phage therapy is recognised, with bacterial strains evolving strategies to block adsorption, prevent injection of phage genetic material and interrupt other systems used by phages to replicate [37, 38]. However, the clinical significance of phage-resistant variants remains unclear. A number of studies have shown that phage resistance may diminish fitness or virulence of these bacterial variants and therefore facilitate clearance by the immune system [38]. In addition to the role of selective pressure in emergence of bacterial resistance, phage-resistant bacterial variants can also occur spontaneously [38]. This was observed in the present study for S. aureus isolates recovered from bone and implants of sham- and vancomycin-treated animals. Notably, phage therapy was not associated with the emergence of resistant variants toward the five-phage cocktail. Indeed, the use of therapeutic phage cocktails is recommended for this very reason: variants resistant to one specific phage type, may remain susceptible to the others comprising the cocktail [38]. Similarly, vancomycin resistance was not observed following antibiotic administration in the present study, with MICs remaining below the MIC breakpoint for intermediate resistance [39]. Nevertheless, the mean vancomycin MIC for S. aureus strains recovered from animals in all treatment groups was significantly higher than the parent strain, suggesting that in vivo growth contributes to the emergence of genetic or phenotypic changes that influence vancomycin sensitivity. Selection for heteroresistance of MSSA to vancomycin (hVISA) and vancomycin MIC creep has been described for osteoarticular infections, though the clinical significance of these variants is not well understood [40, 41]. Further work to address the scientific and therapeutic complexities of phage therapy for the treatment of biofilm-associated PJI including dosing, route of administration and scheduling to improve delivery and efficacy at the site of infection is warranted.
In summary, our data support the concept of phage therapy as a safe and effective adjunct to antibiotics for treatment of S. aureus biofilm-associated PJI following TKA. Two-stage revision is currently the gold standard for management of delayed-onset or chronic PJI, though success rates remain suboptimal [8, 15–17]. One-stage revision is a preferred, more cost-effective approach, requiring a single surgery [42]. If phages could be used in combination with antibiotics, antimicrobial peptides and/or biofilm-disrupting enzymes to improve eradication of bacterial biofilms, one-stage exchanges and implant retention may be feasible. These findings lay the foundation for continued translational studies to optimise phage therapy as a viable adjunct for the treatment of PJI in a post-antibiotic era.
Supporting information
S1 Fig [tif]
Scoring of sensitivity of toward StaPhage preparations.
S1 Table [sham]
Clinical and haematology parameters.
S2 Table [ph]
Phage sensitivity patterns of isolates.
Zdroje
1. Cisek AA, Dabrowska I, Gregorczyk KP, Wyzewski Z. Phage therapy in bacterial infections treatment: One hundred years after the discovery of bacteriophages. Curr Microbiol. 2017;74: 277–283. doi: 10.1007/s00284-016-1166-x 27896482
2. Akanda ZZ, Taha M, Abdelbary H. Current review—The rise of bacteriophage as a unique therapeutic platform in treating peri-prosthetic joint infections. J Orthop Res. 2018;36: 1051–1060. doi: 10.1002/jor.23755 28971508
3. Schmidt C. Phage therapy’s latest makeover. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37: 581–586. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0133-z 31068679
4. Lu TK, Koeris MS. The next generation of bacteriophage therapy. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011;14: 524–531. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2011.07.028 21868281
5. World Health Organisation (WHO). No time to wait: Securing the future from drug-resistant infections. Report to the Secretary-General of the United Nations. Geneva, Switzerland; 2019 April, 2019. www.who.int/antimicrobial-resistance/interagency-coordination-group/final-report/en/
6. Ferry T, Boucher F, Fevre C, Perpoint T, Chateau J, Petitjean C, et al. Innovations for the treatment of a complex bone and joint infection due to XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa including local application of a selected cocktail of bacteriophages. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73: 2901–2903. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky263 30060002
7. Patey O, McCallin S, Mazure H, Liddle M, Smithyman A, Dublanchet A. Clinical indications and compassionate use of phage therapy: Personal experience and literature review with a focus on osteoarticular infections. Viruses. 2018;11: 18. doi: 10.3390/v11010018 30597868
8. Davis J. Prosthetic joint infections in Australia and New Zealand: The first 275 patients from the PIANO (Prosthetic Joint Infection in Australia and New Zealand Observational) study. Orthop Proc. 2016;98-B:58. www.online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/abs/10.1302/1358-992X.98BSUPP_23.EBJIS2016-058
9. Springer BD, Cahue S, Etkin CD, Lewallen DG, McGrory BJ. Infection burden in total hip and knee arthroplasties: an international registry-based perspective. Arthroplast Today. 2017;3: 137–140. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2017.05.003 28695187
10. Tande AJ, Gomez-Urena EO, Berbari EF, Osmon DR. Management of prosthetic joint infection. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2017;31: 237–52. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2017.01.009 28366224
11. Kostakioti M, Hadjifrangiskou M, Hultgren SJ. Bacterial biofilms: development, dispersal, and therapeutic strategies in the dawn of the postantibiotic era. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2013;3: a010306. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a010306 23545571
12. Ricciardi BF, Muthukrishnan G, Masters E, Ninomiya M, Lee CC, Schwarz EM. Staphylococcus aureus Evasion of Host Immunity in the Setting of Prosthetic Joint Infection: Biofilm and Beyond. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018;11: 389–400. doi: 10.1007/s12178-018-9501-4 29987645
13. Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Montanaro L. Implant infections: adhesion, biofilm formation and immune evasion. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16: 397–409. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0019-y 29720707
14. Josse J, Velard F, Gangloff SC. Staphylococcus aureus vs. Osteoblast: relationship and consequences in osteomyelitis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2015;5:85. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2015.00085 26636047
15. Parvizi J, Gehrke T, Chen AF. Proceedings of the International Consensus on Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-b: 1450–1452. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.33135 24151261
16. Ma C-Y, Lu Y-D, Bell KL, Wang J-W, Ko J-Y, Wang C-J, et al. Predictors of treatment failure after 2-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty: a 2- to 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33: 2234–2239. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.007 29572036
17. Tan TL, Goswami K, Kheir MM, Xu C, Wang Q, Parvizi J. Surgical treatment of chronic periprosthetic joint infection: fate of spacer exchanges. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34: 2085–2090. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.016 31182410
18. Dublanchet A, Patey O. Phage therapy for bone and joint infections: Report of French cases. Orthop Proc. 2017;99-B(SUPP_22):35. www.online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/abs/10.1302/1358-992X.2017.22.035
19. Kishor C, Mishra RR, Saraf SK, Kumar M, Srivastav AK, Nath G. Phage therapy of Staphylococcal chronic osteomyelitis in experimental animal model. Indian J Med Res. 2016;143:87–94. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.178615 26997019
20. Morris J, Kelly N, Elliott L, Grant A, Wilkinson M, Hazratwala K, et al. Evaluation of bacteriophage anti-biofilm activity for potential control of orthopedic implant-related infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018;20: 16–24. doi: 10.1089/sur.2018.135 30207891
21. Morris J, Letson H, Grant A, Wilkinson M, Hazratwala K, McEwen P. Experimental model of experimental peri-prosthetic joint infection of the knee caused by Staphylococcus aureus using biomaterials representative of modern TKA. Biol Open. 2019;8: bio045203. doi: 10.1242/bio.045203 31533935
22. Poeppl W, Lingscheid T, Bernitzky D, Schwarze UY, Donath O, Perkmann T, et al. Efficacy of fosfomycin compared to vancomycin in treatment of implant-associated chronic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in rats. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58: 5111–5116. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02720-13 24936591
23. Rouse MS, Piper KE, Jacobson M, Jacofsky DJ, Steckelberg JM, Patel R. Daptomycin treatment of Staphylococcus aureus experimental chronic osteomyelitis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;57: 301–305. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki435 16361330
24. Vergidis P, Schmidt-Malan SM, Mandrekar JN, Steckelberg JM, Patel R. Comparative activities of vancomycin, tigecycline and rifampin in a rat model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis. J Infect. 2015;70: 609–615. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.12.016 25576292
25. Roach DR, Debarbieux L. Phage therapy: awakening a sleeping giant. Emerging Topics in Life Sciences. 2017;1: 93–103. doi: 10.1042/ETLS20170002
26. Marre R, Schulz E, Anders T, Sack K. Renal tolerance and pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in rats. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984;14: 253–260. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.3.253 6490570
27. Yilmaz C, Colak M, Yilmaz BC, Ersoz G, Kutateladze M, Gozlugol M. Bacteriophage therapy in implant-related infections: an experimental study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95: 117–125. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01135 23324958
28. Kutateladze M, Adamia R. Bacteriophages as potential new therapeutics to replace or supplement antibiotics. Trends Biotechnol. 2010;28: 591–595. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.08.001 20810181
29. Barakat A, Schilling WHK, Sharma S, Guryel E, Freeman R. Chronic osteomyelitis: a review on current concepts and trends in treatment. Orthop Trauma. 2019;33: 181–187. doi: 10.1016/j.mporth.2019.03.005
30. Thabit AK, Fatani DF, Bamakhrama MS, Barnawi OA, Basudan LO, Alhejaili SF. Antibiotic penetration into bone and joints: An updated review. Int J Infect Dis. 2019;81: 128–136. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.02.005 30772469
31. Torres-Barcelo C, Gurney J, Gougat-Barbera C, Vasse M, Hochberg ME. Transient negative effects of antibiotics on phages do not jeopardise the advantages of combination therapies. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2018;94: doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiy107 29878184
32. Champagne CP, Gardner N. The spot test method for the in-plant enumeration of bacteriophages with paired cultures of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus salivarius subsp. thermophilus. Intern Dairy J. 1995;5: 417–425.
33. Speck P, Smithyman A. Safety and efficacy of phage therapy via the intravenous route. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2016;363: pii: fnv242. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnv242 26691737
34. Van Belleghem JD, Dabrowska K, Vaneechoutte M, Barr JJ, Bollyky PL. Interactions between bacteriophage, bacteria, and the mammalian immune system. Viruses. 2018;11: pii: E10. doi: 10.3390/v11010010 30585199
35. Krut O, Bekeredjian-Ding I. Contribution of the immune response to phage therapy. J Immunol. 2018;200: 3037–344. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701745 29685950
36. Dąbrowska K. Phage therapy: What factors shape phage pharmacokinetics and bioavailability? Systematic and critical review. Med Res Rev. 2019;39: 2000–2025. doi: 10.1002/med.21572 30887551
37. Seed KD. Battling phages: how bacteria defend against viral attack. PLoS Pathogens. 2015;11: e1004847. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004847 26066799
38. Oechslin F. Resistance development to bacteriophages occurring during bacteriophage therapy. Viruses. 2018;10:351. doi: 10.3390/v10070351 29966329
39. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). CLSI M100-ED29:2019 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Pennsylvannia, USA; 2019. www.clsi.org/standards/products/free-resources/access-our-free-resources/
40. Dhand A, Sakoulas G. Reduced vancomycin susceptibility among clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates ('the MIC Creep'): implications for therapy. F1000 Med Rep. 2012;4: 4. doi: 10.3410/M4-4 22312414
41. Kok EY, Vallejo JG, Sommer LM, Rosas L, Kaplan SL, Hulten KG, et al. Association of vancomycin MIC and molecular characteristics with clinical outcomes in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus acute hematogenous osteoarticular infections in children. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62: e00084–18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00084-18 29530845
42. Srivastava K, Bozic KJ, Silverton C, Nelson AJ, Makhni EC, Davis JJ. Reconsidering strategies for managing chronic periprosthetic joint infection in total knee Arthroplasty: using decision analytics to find the optimal strategy between one-stage and two-stage total knee revision. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101: 14–24. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00874 30601412
Článok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 12
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Nejasný stín na plicích – kazuistika
- Masturbační chování žen v ČR − dotazníková studie
- Těžké menstruační krvácení může značit poruchu krevní srážlivosti. Jaký management vyšetření a léčby je v takovém případě vhodný?
- Fixní kombinace paracetamol/kodein nabízí synergické analgetické účinky
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Methylsulfonylmethane increases osteogenesis and regulates the mineralization of the matrix by transglutaminase 2 in SHED cells
- Oregano powder reduces Streptococcus and increases SCFA concentration in a mixed bacterial culture assay
- The characteristic of patulous eustachian tube patients diagnosed by the JOS diagnostic criteria
- Parametric CAD modeling for open source scientific hardware: Comparing OpenSCAD and FreeCAD Python scripts