Agronomic performance of lettuce cultivars submitted to different irrigation depths
Autoři:
Claudinei Martins Guimarães aff001; Fernando França da Cunha aff001; Francisco Charles dos Santos Silva aff001; Edcássio Dias Araújo aff001; Aline Baldez Felismino Guimarães aff002; Everardo Chartuni Mantovani aff001; Derly José Henriques da Silva aff003
Působiště autorů:
Department of Agricultural Engineering, Center of Agricultural Sciences, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa-MG, Brazil
aff001; Department of Domestic Economy, Center of Human Sciences, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa-MG, Brazil
aff002; Department of Phytotechnics, Center of Agricultural Sciences, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa-MG, Brazil
aff003
Vyšlo v časopise:
PLoS ONE 14(12)
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224264
Souhrn
The use of cultivars adapted to the climate and soil conditions associated with adequate irrigation supply maximizes lettuce agronomic performance. The aim of this work was to evaluate the agronomic performance of four lettuce cultivars submitted to five different drip irrigation depths under a protected environment in Viçosa-MG, Brazil. A randomized block design was applied in a split plot scheme with four replications, and several agronomic characteristics were evaluated by analysis of variance, Tukey range tests, regression and principal component analysis. A higher chlorophyll concentration in the Raider Plus cultivar promoted the production of more leaves, leading to a higher phytomass. The Luara cultivar presented a higher number of commercial leaves per plant than the other cultivars, regardless of the irrigation depth, reflected in a larger diameter and volume of the aerial part of the plants. The Raider Plus and Luara cultivars presented better root development than that of the other cultivars, reducing the effect of plant water stress even under lower irrigation depth conditions. Although higher water productivity (WP) was observed for the lowest irrigation depth (50% of ETc), important variables reached the maximum values at depths higher than 100% water replenishment. Therefore, Raider Plus and Luara cultivars with an irrigation depth of 110% of crop evapotranspiration provided better commercial lettuce quality and are recommended for lettuce cultivation in the research region and under conditions similar to those of the present study.
Klíčová slova:
Leaves – Crops – Chlorophyll – Vegetables – Agricultural irrigation – Lettuce – Vegetable crops – Drip irrigation
Zdroje
1. Figueiredo CC, Ramos MLG, Mcmanus CM, Menezes AM. (2012). Mineralização de esterco de ovinos e sua influência na produção de alface. Horticultura Brasileira 30(1): 175–179. Portuguese.
2. Koefender J, Schoffel A, Manfio CE, Golle DP, Silva NA, Horn RC. (2016). Consorciação entre alface e cebola em diferentes espaçamentos. Horticultura Brasileira, 34: 580–583. Portuguese.
3. Sala FC, Costa CP. (2012). Retrospectiva e tendência da alfacicultura brasileira. Horticultura Brasileira 30(2): 187–194. Portuguese.
4. Caliskan S, Yetisir H, Karanlik S. (2014). Combined use of green manure and farmyard manure allows better nutrition of organic lettuce. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 42(1): 248–254.
5. Kapoulas N, Koukounaras A, Ilić ZS. (2017). Nutritional quality of lettuce and onion as companion plants from organic and conventional production in north Greece. Scientia Horticulturae 219: 310–318.
6. Nandi R, Gowdru N, Bokelmann W, Dias G. (2015). Smallholder organic farmer’s attitudes, objectives and barriers towards production of organic fruits and vegetables in India: a multivariate analysis. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 27(5): 396–406.
7. Arantes CRDA Junior SS, Camili EC Diamante MS, Pinto ESC. (2014). Produção e tolerância ao pendoamento de alface-romana em diferentes ambientes. Revista Ceres 61(5): 558–566. Portuguese.
8. Foteinis S, Chatzisymeon E. (2016). Life cycle assessment of organic versus conventional agriculture. A case study of lettuce cultivation in Greece. Journal of Cleaner Production 112(4): 2462–2471.
9. Bandeira GRL, Pinto HCS, Magalhães OS, Aragão CA, Queiroz SOP, Souza ER, et al. (2011). Manejo de irrigação para cultivo de alface em ambiente protegido. Horticultura Brasileira 29: 237–241. Portuguese.
10. Tringovska I, Yankova V, Markova D, Mihov M. (2015). Effect of companion plants on tomato greenhouse production. Scientia Horticulturae 186(21): 31–37.
11. Carvalho J de A, Rezende FC, Aquino RF, Freitas WA de; Oliveira EC. (2012). Produção da ervilha cultivada em ambiente protegido sob diferentes tensões de água no solo. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 16(1): 44–50. Portuguese.
12. Silva JA, Pires RCM, Sakai E, Silva TJA, Andrade JE, Arruda FB, et al. (2007). Desenvolvimento e produtividade da cultura da batata irrigada por gotejamento em dois sistemas de cultivo. Engenharia Agrícola 27(2): 354–362. Portuguese.
13. Reichardt K. (1978). A água na produção agrícola. São Paulo: McGraw-Hill do Brasil. Portuguese.
14. Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, Goncalves JLM, Sparovek G. (2013). Köppen's climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 22(6): 711–728.
15. Ribeiro AC, Guimarães PTG, Alvarez VVH. (1999). Recomendações para o uso de corretivos e fertilizantes em Minas Gerais– 5ª aproximação. Viçosa: CFSEMG, p.177. Portuguese.
16. Embrapa—Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. (2011). Manual de métodos de análise de solo. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Embrapa Solos, 230 p. Portuguese.
17. Richards LA. (1949). Methods of measuring soil moisture tension. Soil Science of American Journal 68(1): 95–112.
18. Embrapa—Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. (2013). Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. 3.ed. Rio de Janeiro, Embrapa Solos, 353 p. Portuguese.
19. Keller J, Karmeli D. (1975). Trickle irrigation design. Glendora: Rain Bird Sprinkler Manufacturing, 133 p.
20. Denículi W, Bernardo S, Thiébaut JTL, Sediyama GC. (1980). Uniformidade distribuição de água, em condições de campo num sistema de irrigação por gotejamento. Revista Ceres 27(150): 155–162. Portuguese.
21. Bernardo S, Soares AA, Mantovani EC. (2006). Manual de Irrigação. 8. ed. Viçosa: Editora UFV, 625 p. Portuguese.
22. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Rome: FAO, 297 p. (Irrigation and Drainage Paper, 56).
23. Doorenbos J, Pruit WO. (1977). Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements. Rome: FAO, 179p. (FAO: Irrigation and Drainage Paper, 24).
24. Marouelli WA, Silva WLC, Silva HR. (2008). Irrigação por aspersão em hortaliças: qualidade da água, aspectos do sistema e método prático de manejo. 2 ed. Brasília: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 150p. Portuguese.
25. Keller J. (1978). Trickle irrigation. Colorado: En Soil Conservation Service National Engineering Handbook, 129 p.
26. Brunini GA, Lisbão RS, Bernardi JB. (1976). Temperatura base para a Alface (Lactuca sativa L.) cultivar “White Boston”, em sistema de unidades térmicas. Revista de Olericultura 35(19): 214–219. Portuguese.
27. Araújo TS, Fideles Filho J, Kumar KK, Rao TVR. (2010). Crescimento da alface-americana em função dos ambientes, épocas e graus-dias. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias 5(4): 441–449. Portuguese.
28. Limantara L, Dettling M, Indrawati R, Brotosudarmo THP. (2015). Analysis on the chlorophyll content of commercial green leafy vegetables. Procedia Chemistry, 14: 225.
29. Lucena RRM, Batista TMV, Dombroski JLD, Lopes WAR, Rodrigues GSO. (2011). Medição de área foliar de aceloreira. Revista Caatinga 24: 40–45. Portuguese.
30. Lúcio AD, Haesbaert FM, Santos D, Benz V. (2011). Estimativa do tamanho de parcela para experimentos com alface. Horticultura Brasileira 29: 510–515. Portuguese.
31. Puiatti M, Finger FL. (2005). Fatores climáticos. In: FONTES, P.C.R. Olericultura: teoria e prática. Viçosa: Ed. da UFV, p.17–30. Portuguese.
32. Radin B, Reisser Júnior C, Matzenauer R, Bergamashi H. (2004). Crescimento de cultivares de alface conduzidas em estufa e a campo. Horticultura Brasileira 22: 178–181. Portuguese.
33. Vandana V, Bhatt RK. (1999). Physiological changes in Sesbania species to reducing light intensities. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 182:43–47.
34. Kosma C, Triantafyllidis V, Papasavvas A, Salahas G, Patakas A. (2013). Yield and nutritional quality of greenhouse lettuce as affected by shading and cultivation season. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 25(12): 974–979.
35. Jordan RA, Geisenhoff LO1, Oliveira FC de, Santos RC, Martins EAS. (2018). Yield of lettuce grown in aquaponic system using different substrates. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 22(1): 27–31.
36. Taiz L, Zeiger E, Moller IM, Murphy A. (2017). Fisiologia e desenvolvimento vegetal. 6. ed.–Porto Alegre: Artmed. Portuguese.
37. Oliveira F de A de, Carrilho MJS de O, Medeiros JF de, Maracajá PB, Oliveira MKT de. (2011). Desempenho de cultivares de alface submetidas a diferentes níveis de salinidade da água de irrigação. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 15(8): 771–777. Portuguese.
38. Jaimez RE, Rada F, Garcia-Nuñez C. (1999). The effect of irrigation frequency on water and carbon relations in three cultivars of sweet pepper (Capsicum chinense Jacq), in a tropical semiarid region. Scientia Horticulturae 81: 301–305.
39. Peixoto Filho JU, Freire MBG dos S, Freire FJ, Miranda MFA, Pessoa LGM, Kamimura KM. (2013). Produtividade de alface com doses de esterco de frango, bovino e ovino em cultivos sucessivos. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 17: 419–424. Portuguese.
40. Vilas Boas RC, Carvalho JA, Gomes LAA, Sousa AMG, Rodrigues RC, Souza KJ. (2008). Avaliação técnica e econômica da produção de duas cultivatires de alface tipo crespa em função de lâminas de irrigação. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 32(2): 525–531. Portuguese.
41. Pearson K. (1901). On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazine 2(6): 559–572.
42. Johnson RA, Wichern DW. (1999). Applied multivariate statistical analysis. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 815 p.23.
43. Gotelli NJ, Ellison AM. (2010). Princípios de Estatística em Ecologia. Artmed; Edição 1. Portuguese.
Článok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 12
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Nejasný stín na plicích – kazuistika
- Masturbační chování žen v ČR − dotazníková studie
- Těžké menstruační krvácení může značit poruchu krevní srážlivosti. Jaký management vyšetření a léčby je v takovém případě vhodný?
- Fixní kombinace paracetamol/kodein nabízí synergické analgetické účinky
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Methylsulfonylmethane increases osteogenesis and regulates the mineralization of the matrix by transglutaminase 2 in SHED cells
- Oregano powder reduces Streptococcus and increases SCFA concentration in a mixed bacterial culture assay
- The characteristic of patulous eustachian tube patients diagnosed by the JOS diagnostic criteria
- Parametric CAD modeling for open source scientific hardware: Comparing OpenSCAD and FreeCAD Python scripts