Leisure-time physical activity and sports in the Brazilian population: A social disparity analysis

English version

Autoři: Margareth Guimarães Lima ^aff001; Deborah Carvalho Malta ^aff002; Camila Nascimento Monteiro ^aff003; Neuciani Ferreira da Silva Sousa ^aff005; Sheila Rizzato Stopa ^aff006; Lhaís de Paula Barbosa Medina ^aff001; Marilisa Berti de Azevedo Barros ^aff001
Působiště autorů: School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil ^aff001; School of Nursing, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil ^aff002; Núcleo de Indicadores e Sistemas de Informação, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil ^aff003; Department of Preventive Medicine, Medicine School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil ^aff004; Institute of Collective Health, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil ^aff005; Department of Health Analysis and Noncommunicable Diseases Surveillance, Health Surveillance Secretariat, Ministry of Health, Brasília, DF, Brazil ^aff006
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225940

Souhrn

Objectives

To estimate the prevalence of leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) or sports in the Brazilian population according to demographic and income variables.

Methods

Data from 60,202 Brazilian individuals (18 years and over) were analyzed, belonging to the National Health Survey 2013 sample. The prevalence of different modalities of LTPA and sports was estimated according to age, sex, skin color and income. The adjusted prevalence ratios were estimated by Poisson regression.

Results

Of every thousand Brazilians, 695 do not practice LTPA or sports. Walking is the most practiced LTPA (98/1000), followed by soccer (68/1000) and weight training (45/1000). For poor and black men, the most frequent LTPA was soccer, and, for women, gymnastics and walking. The prevalence of weight training and gymnastics was higher for white people compared with black people. All LTPA practices were more prevalent in individuals with higher income, except for soccer. Running on a treadmill and weight training had, respectively, 24.7 and 6.4 times higher prevalence in the richer quartile.

Conclusions

The study allowed identifying the type of LTPA and sport reported as the most frequent by the Brazilian population according to age, sex, skin color, and income, detecting strong social disparities in these practices.

Klíčová slova:

Physical activity – Elderly – Brazil – Exercise – Sports – Running – Strength training – Swimming

Zdroje

1. Mielke GI, Malta DC, de Sá GB, Reis RS, Hallal PC. Regional differences and correlates of leisure time physical activity in Brazil: results from the Brazilian National Health Survey-2013. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2015a;Suppl 2:158–169.

2. Barros MBA, Lima MG, Medina LP, Szwarcwald CL, Malta DC. Social inequalities in health behaviors among Brazilian adults: National Health Survey, 2013. Int J Equity in Health 2016. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0439-0 27852275

3. Oliveira GD, Oancea SC, Nucci LB, Vogeltanz-Holm N. The association between physical activity and depression among individuals residing in Brazil. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018;53(4):373–383 doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1441-6 28889252

4. Bauman A, Ma G, Cuevas F, Omar Z, Waqanivalu T, Phongsavan P, et al. Cross-national comparisons of socioeconomic differences in the prevalence of leisure-time and occupational physical activity, and active commuting in six Asia-Pacific countries. J Epidemiol Community Health 2011;65(1):35–43. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.086710 20943821

5. Beenackers MA, Giskes CBMK, Brug J, Kusnt AE, Burdorf A, Lenthe FJV. Socioeconomic inequalities in occupational, leisure-time, and transport related physical activity among European adults: A systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Sep 19;9:116. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-116 22992350

6. Azevedo MR, Araújo CL, Reichert FF, Siqueira FV, da Silva MC, Hallal PC. Gender differences in leisure-time physical activity. Int J Public Health 2007;52(1):8–15. doi: 10.1007/s00038-006-5062-1 17966815

7. Malta DC, Andrade SSA, Santos MAS, Rodrigues GBA, Mielke G. Tendências dos indicadores de atividade física em adultos: conjunto de capitais do Brasil 2006–2013. Rev Bras Ativ Fís Saúde 2015;20(2):141–151.

8. Moore LV, Harris CD, Carlson SA, Kruger J, Fulton JE. Trends in no leisure-time physical activity—United States, 1988–2010. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2012;83(4):587–591. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2012.10599884 23367822

9. Malta DC, Moura EC, Castro AM, Cruz DKA, Morais Neto OL, Monteiro CA. Padrão de atividade física em adultos brasileiros: resultados de um inquérito por entrevistas telefônicas, 2006. Epidemiol. Serv. Saúde 2009;18(1):7–16.

10. De Sa TH, Garcia LMT, Claro RM. Frequency, distribution and time trends of types of leisure-time physical activity in Brazil, 2006–2012. International Journal of Public Health 2014;59(6):975–982. doi: 10.1007/s00038-014-0590-6 25047019

11. Bates JH; Serdula MK; Khan LK; Jones DA; Gillespie C; Ainsworth BE. Total and leisure-time walking among U.S. adults should every step count? Am J Prev Med 2005;29(1):46–50. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.03.011 15958251

12. Stamatakis E, Chaudhury M. Temporal trends in adults’ sports participation patterns in England between 1997 and 2006: the Health Survey for England. Br J Sports Med 2008;42:901–908. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.048082 18658250

13. Monteiro CA, Conde WM, Matsudo SM, Matsudo VR, Bonseñor, Lotufo PA. A descriptive epidemiology of leisure-time physical activity in Brazil, 1996–1997. Pan Am J Public Health 2003;14(4):246–254.

14. World Health Organization. WHO | Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva, 2010. Available from: https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/global-PA-recs-2010.pdf

15. Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee IM, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(7):1334–1359. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb 21694556

16. Prestes J; Assumpção CO. Ginástica em academias. In: Gaio T; Góis AAF; Batista JCF (Orgs.). A Ginástica em Questão–Corpo e Movimento: Phort Editora; 2010. pp. 137–158.

17. Brasil, 2017. Movimento é vida: Atividades físicas e esportivas para todas as pessoas. Relatório Nacional de Desenvolvimento Humano no Brasil. Programa das nações unidas para o desenvolvimento–PNUD. Brasília, DF, 2017. Avaliable from:http://movimentoevida.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/09/PNUD_RNDH_completo.pdf

18. Liz CM, Crocetta TB, Viana MS, Brandt R, Andrade A. Aderência à prática de exercícios físicos em academias de ginástica. Motriz 2010;16:181–188.

19. Fanzini F. Futebol é “coisa para macho”? Pequeno esboço para uma história de mulheres no país do futebol. Revista Brasileira de História 2005; 25(50):315–328.

20. Seabra AF, Mendonça DM, Thomis MA, Anjos LA, Maia JA. Biological and sócio-cultural determinants of physical activity in adolescents. Cad. Saúde Pública 2005;24(4):721–736.

21. Locatelli PAPC, Cavedon NR. As gurias: exercício etnográfico realizado com mulheres idosas praticantes de hidroginástica. Ciências sociais em Perspectiva 2011;10(18): 45–61.

22. Marmot M. WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the health gap in a generation: the work of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health and its recommendations. Glob Health Promot.2009; Suppl 1: 23–27. doi: 10.1177/1757975909103742 19477825

23. Silva KS, Lopes AS, Duca GFD, Garcia LMT, Nahas MV. Patterns of engagement in leisure-time physical activities of workers with different economic status: a descriptive analysis. Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance. 2013;15(6):656–666.

24. Zanchetta LM. Barros MBA, César CLG, Carandina L, Goldbaum M, Alves MCGP. Inatividade física e fatores associados em adultos, São Paulo, Brasil. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2010; 13(3): 387–399. doi: 10.1590/s1415-790x2010000300003 20857026

25. Dumith SC, Domingues MR, Gigante DP. Epidemiologia das atividades físicas praticadas no tempo de lazer por adultos do Sul do Brasil. Rev Bras Epidemiol 646 2009; 12(4): 646–658.

26. Damacena GN, Szwarcwald CL, Malta DC, Souza-Júnior PRB, Vieira MLFP, Pereira CA, et al. O processo de desenvolvimento da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde no Brasil, 2013. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde 2015;24:197–206.

27. Barros A, Hirakata VN. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2003;3:21–34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-3-21 14567763

28. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U, et al. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls and prospects. Lancet 2012;380(9839):20–30.

29. Brasil, OXFAM. A distância que nos une: Um retrato das desigualdades brasileiras. Set., 2017. Avaliable from: https://oxfam.org.br/um-retrato-das-desigualdades-brasileiras/a-distancia-que-nos-une/

30. Souza-Júnior PRB, Freitas MPS, Antonaci GA, Szwarcwald CL. Sampling Design for the National Health Survey, Brazil 2013. Epidemiol. Serv. Saúde 2015 24(2). doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742015000200003

31. Oliveira Pinto T, Lopes MF. Brincadeira no espaço da rua e a demarcação dos gêneros na infância. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales 2009; 7(2):861–885.

32. Kruger J, Ham SA, Berrigan D, Ballard-Barbash. Prevalence of transportation and leisure time walking among U.S. adults. Preventive Medicine 2008;47:329–334. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.02.018 18445507

33. Andrade COP, Godinho RCR, Magri RAF. Elaboração e aplicação de uma rota de trekking em uma área do arque Nacional da Serra da Canastra. Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo 2016;9(2):285–307.

34. Rodrigues CAFG. Olhares sobre a cidade: reflexos das alterações urbanas na formação do jogador de futebol ao longo do século XX. Monografy, Federal University of Uberlandia.2008. Available from: https://repositorio.ufu.br/bitstream/123456789/18870/1/OlharesCidadeFutebol.pdf

35. Teixeira FLS, Caminha IO. Preconceito no futebol feminino brasileiro: uma revisão sistemática. Movimento 2013;19(1):265–287.

36. Suominen H. Muscle training for bone strength. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2006;18(2):85–93. doi: 10.1007/bf03327422 16702776

37. Senderovich H, Tang H, Belmont. The role of exercises in osteoporotic fracture prevention and current care gaps. Where are we now? Recent updates. Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal 2017 Jul 8(3). doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10308 28786812

38. Clemson L, Singh MAF, Bundy A, Cumming RG, Manollaras K, O’Loughlin P, et al. Integration of balance and strength training into daily life activity to reduce rate of falls in older people (the LIFE study): randomized parallel trial. BMJ 2012 Aug. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4547 22872695

39. Lepsen AM, Silva MC. Perfil dos frequentadores das academias ao ar livre da cidade de Pelotas–RS. Rev Bras Ativ Fís Saúde 2015;20(4):413–24.

40. Brasil, 2014a. Academia da Saúde. Ministério da Saúde, Brasília, DF, 2014. Avaliable from:http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/academia_saude_cartilha.pdf

41. Fernandes AP, Andrade ACS, Ramos CGC, Friche AAL, Dias MAS, Xavier CC et al. Leisure-time physical activity in the vicinity of Academias da Cidade Program in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais State, Brazil: the impact of a health promotion program on the community. Cad. Saúde Pública 2015. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00104514 26648374

42. Boon RM, Hamlin MJ, Steel GD, Ross JJ. Validation of the New Zealand Physical Activity Questionnaire (NZPAQ-LF) and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-LF) with accelerometry. Br J Sports Med 2010;44:741–746. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.052167 18981036

43. Biernat E, Stupnicki R, Lebiedziński B, Janczewska L. Assessment of physical activity by applying IPQ questionnaire. Physical Education and Sport 2008; 52:46–52.