Elevation, an emotion for prosocial contagion, is experienced more strongly by those with greater expectations of the cooperativeness of others
Autoři:
Adam Maxwell Sparks aff001; Daniel M. T. Fessler aff001; Colin Holbrook aff001
Působiště autorů:
Department of Anthropology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
aff001; Center for Behavior, Evolution and Culture, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
aff002; Bedari Kindness Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
aff003; Department of Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California Merced, Merced, California, United States of America
aff004
Vyšlo v časopise:
PLoS ONE 14(12)
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226071
Souhrn
A unique emotion, elevation, is thought to underlie prosocial contagion, a process whereby witnessing a prosocial act leads to acting prosocially. Individuals differ in their propensity to experience elevation, and thus their proneness to prosocial contagion, but little is known about the causes of such variation. We introduce an adaptationist model wherein elevation marks immediate circumstances in which generalized prosociality is advantageous, with this evaluation of circumstances hinging in part on prior expectations of others’ prosociality. In 15 studies, we add to evidence that elevation can reliably be elicited and mediates prosocial contagion. Importantly, we confirm a novel prediction–generated by our adaptationist account–that an idealistic attitude, which indexes others’ expected degree of prosociality, moderates the relationship between exposure to prosocial cues and experiencing elevation. We discuss how our findings inform both basic theorizing in the affective sciences and translational efforts to engineer a more harmonious world, and we offer future research directions to further test and extend our model.
Klíčová slova:
Learning – Human learning – Employment – Behavior – Emotions – Motivation – Prosocial behavior – Gratitude
Zdroje
1. Kraft-Todd G, Yoeli E, Bhanot S, Rand D. Promoting cooperation in the field. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 2015;3: 96–101. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.02.006
2. Fessler DMT, Gervais MM. From whence the captains of our lives: Ultimate and phylogenetic perspectives on emotions in humans and other primates. In: Kappeler PM, Silk J, editors. Mind the Gap. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2010. pp. 261–280. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02725-3_12
3. Fessler DMT, Haley KJ. The strategy of afffect: Emotions in human cooperation. In: Hammerstein P, editor. Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003.
4. McCullough ME, Kimeldorf MB, Cohen AD. An Adaptation for Altruism: The Social Causes, Social Effects, and Social Evolution of Gratitude. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2008;17: 281–285. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00590.x
5. Fredrickson BL. The Role of Positive Emotions in Positive Psychology. The American psychologist. 2001;56: 218–226. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3122271/ doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.218 11315248
6. Frank RH. Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. New York, NY, US: W W Norton & Co; 1988.
7. Haidt J. The Positive Emotion of Elevation. Prevention and Treatment. 2000;3.
8. Pohling R, Diessner R. Moral elevation and moral beauty: A review of the empirical literature. Review of General Psychology. 2016;20: 412–425. doi: 10.1037/gpr0000089
9. Thomson AL, Siegel JT. Elevation: A review of scholarship on a moral and other-praising emotion. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2017;12: 628–638. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2016.1269184
10. Fiske AP, Schubert TW, Seibt B. “Kama Muta” or “Being Moved by Love”: A bootstrapping approach to the ontology and epistemology of an emotion. In: Cassaniti J, Menon U, editors. Universalism without Uniformity: Explorations in Mind and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2016. p. 24.
11. Gervais MM, Fessler DMT. On the deep structure of social affect: Attitudes, emotions, sentiments, and the case of “contempt”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2017;40. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000352 27001168
12. Aquino K, McFerran B, Laven M. Moral identity and the experience of moral elevation in response to acts of uncommon goodness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2011;100: 703–718. doi: 10.1037/a0022540 21443375
13. Thomson AL, Siegel JT. A moral act, elevation, and prosocial behavior: Moderators of morality. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2013;8: 50–64. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2012.754926
14. Vianello M, Galliani EM, Haidt J. Elevation at work: The effects of leaders’ moral excellence. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2010;5: 390–411. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2010.516764
15. Schnall S, Roper J, Fessler DMT. Elevation Leads to Altruistic Behavior. Psychological Science. 2010;21: 315–320. doi: 10.1177/0956797609359882 20424062
16. Algoe SB, Haidt J. Witnessing excellence in action: The “other-praising” emotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2009;4: 105–127. doi: 10.1080/17439760802650519 19495425
17. Jefferson T. Letter to Robert Skipwith. In: Peterson M, editor. The portable Thomas Jefferson. New York: Penguin; 1771. pp. 349–351.
18. Kafashan S, Sparks A, Rotella A, Barclay P. Why heroism exists: Evolutionary perspectives on extreme helping. In: Allison S, Goethals G, Kramer R, editors. The Handbook of Heroism and Heroic Leadership. New York: Routledge; 2017.
19. Scott-Phillips TC, Dickins TE, West SA. Evolutionary theory and the ultimate–proximate distinction in the human behavioral sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2011;6: 38–47. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393528 26162114
20. Muthukrishna M, Henrich J. A problem in theory. Nature Human Behaviour. 2019 [cited 15 Feb 2019]. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0522-1 30953018
21. Barclay P. Biological markets and the effects of partner choice on cooperation and friendship. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2016;7: 33–38. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.012
22. Barclay P. Strategies for cooperation in biological markets, especially for humans. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2013;34: 164–175. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.02.002
23. Chaudhuri A. Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: A selective survey of the literature. Experimental Economics. 2011;14: 47–83. doi: 10.1007/s10683-010-9257-1
24. Fehr E, Fischbacher U. The nature of human altruism. Nature. 2003;425: 785–791. doi: 10.1038/nature02043 14574401
25. Fehr E, Fischbacher U. Social norms and human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2004;8: 185–190. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.007 15050515
26. Gächter S. Conditional cooperation: Behavioral regularities from the lab and the field and their policy implications. In: Frey B, Stutzer A, editors. Economics and Psychology A Promising New Cross-Disciplinary Field. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2007. pp. 19–50.
27. Fowler JH, Christakis NA. Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010;107: 5334–5338. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913149107 20212120
28. Hill RV, Maruyama E, Viceisza A. Breaking the norm: An empirical investigation into the unraveling of good behavior. Journal of Development Economics. 2012;99: 150–162. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.11.004
29. Kocher MG, Cherry T, Kroll S, Netzer RJ, Sutter M. Conditional cooperation on three continents. Economics Letters. 2008;101: 175–178. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2008.07.015
30. Peysakhovich A, Rand DG. Habits of virtue: Creating norms of cooperation and defection in the laboratory. Management Science. 2015;62: 631–647. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2168
31. Suri S, Watts DJ. Cooperation and contagion in web-based, networked public goods experiments. Sporns O, editor. PLoS ONE. 2011;6: e16836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016836 21412431
32. Thöni C, Gächter S. Peer effects and social preferences in voluntary cooperation: A theoretical and experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology. 2015;48: 72–88. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2015.03.001
33. Tsvetkova M, Macy MW. The social contagion of generosity. PLOS ONE. 2014;9: e87275. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087275 24551053
34. Tsvetkova M, Macy M. The social contagion of antisocial behavior. Sociological Science. 2015;2: 36–49. doi: 10.15195/v2.a4
35. Holloway S, Tucker L, Hornstein HA. The effects of social and nonsocial information on interpersonal behavior of males: The news makes news. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1977;35: 514–522. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.35.7.514
36. Hornstein HA, LaKind E, Frankel G, Manne S. Effects of knowledge about remote social events on prosocial behavior, social conception, and mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1975;32: 1038–1046. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.32.6.1038
37. Yao Z, Yu R. The spreading of social energy: How exposure to positive and negative social news affects behavior. Du W-B, editor. PLOS ONE. 2016;11: e0156062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156062 27253877
38. Lange MA de, Debets LW, Ruitenburg K, Holland RW. Making less of a mess: Scent exposure as a tool for behavioral change. Social Influence. 2012;7: 90–97. doi: 10.1080/15534510.2012.659509
39. Keizer K, Lindenberg S, Steg L. The Spreading of Disorder. Science. 2008;322: 1681–1685. doi: 10.1126/science.1161405 19023045
40. Keizer K, Lindenberg S, Steg L. The importance of demonstratively restoring order. PLOS ONE. 2013;8: e65137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065137 23755182
41. Schaefers T, Wittkowski K, Benoit (née Moeller) S, Ferraro R. Contagious effects of customer misbehavior in access-based services. Journal of Service Research. 2016;19: 3–21. doi: 10.1177/1094670515595047
42. Schultz PW, Bator RJ, Large LB, Bruni CM, Tabanico JJ. Littering in context: Personal and environmental predictors of littering behavior. Environment and Behavior. 2013;45: 35–59. doi: 10.1177/0013916511412179
43. Henrich J, Gil-White FJ. The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2001;22: 165–196. doi: 10.1016/s1090-5138(00)00071-4 11384884
44. Fehr E, Gächter S. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature. 2002;415: 137–140. doi: 10.1038/415137a 11805825
45. Gachter S, Renner E, Sefton M. The long-run benefits of punishment. Science. 2008;322: 1510–1510. doi: 10.1126/science.1164744 19056978
46. Yamagishi T. The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51: 110–116. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.110
47. Wilson M, Daly M. Competitiveness, risk taking, and violence: The young male syndrome. Ethology and Sociobiology. 1985;6: 59–73. doi: 10.1016/0162-3095(85)90041-X
48. Schubert TW, Zickfeld JH, Seibt B, Fiske AP. Moment to moment changes in feeling moved match changes in closeness, tears, goosebumps, and warmth: Time series analyses. Cognition and Emotion. 2018;32: 174–184. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1268998 28024440
49. Englander ZA, Haidt J, Morris JP. Neural basis of moral elevation demonstrated through inter-subject synchronization of cortical activity during free-viewing. Paul F, editor. PLoS ONE. 2012;7: e39384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039384 22745745
50. Freeman D, Aquino K, McFerran B. Overcoming beneficiary race as an impediment to charitable donations: Social Dominance Orientation, the experience of moral elevation, and donation behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2009;35: 72–84. doi: 10.1177/0146167208325415 19017786
51. Landis SK, Sherman MF, Piedmont RL, Kirkhart MW, Rapp EM, Bike DH. The relation between elevation and self-reported prosocial behavior: Incremental validity over the Five-Factor Model of Personality. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2009;4: 71–84. doi: 10.1080/17439760802399208
52. Bartko JJ. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as a Measure of Reliability. Psychological Reports. 1966;19: 3–11. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.3 5942109
53. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018. Available: https://www.R-project.org/
54. Viechtbauer W. Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package. Journal of Statistical Software. 2010;36. doi: 10.18637/jss.v036.i02
55. Tingley D, Yamamoto T, Hirose K, Keele L, Imai K. Mediation: R Package for Causal Mediation Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software. 2014;59. doi: 10.18637/jss.v059.i13
56. Fredrickson B. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2004;359: 1367–1377. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1512 15347528
57. Fredrickson B. What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology. 1998;2: 300–319. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300 21850154
58. Diessner R, Iyer R, Smith MM, Haidt J. Who engages with moral beauty? Journal of Moral Education. 2013;42: 139–163. doi: 10.1080/03057240.2013.785941
59. Cohen TR, Montoya RM, Insko CA. Group Morality and Intergroup Relations: Cross-Cultural and Experimental Evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2006;32: 1559–1572. doi: 10.1177/0146167206291673 17030895
60. Rai TS, Fiske AP. Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review. 2011;118: 57–75. doi: 10.1037/a0021867 21244187
61. Alexander R. The Biology of Moral Systems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 1987.
62. Holbrook Colin. Adaptation, co-optation, variation: Emotions in evolutionary context. In: Scarantino A, editor. Routledge Handbook of Emotion Theory. New York: Taylor & Francis;
63. Fessler DMT. Shame in Two Cultures: Implications for Evolutionary Approaches. Journal of Cognition and Culture. 2004;4: 207–262. doi: 10.1163/1568537041725097
64. Forster DE, Pedersen EJ, Smith A, McCullough ME, Lieberman D. Benefit valuation predicts gratitude. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2017;38: 18–26. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.06.003
65. Sell A, Tooby J, Cosmides L. Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009;106: 15073–15078. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904312106 19666613
66. Sznycer D, Tooby J, Cosmides L, Porat R, Shalvi S, Halperin E. Shame closely tracks the threat of devaluation by others, even across cultures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016;113: 2625–2630. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1514699113 26903649
67. Levy RI. Tahitians: Mind and Experience in the Society Islands. University of Chicago Press; 1975.
68. Shweder RA, Haidt J, Horton R, Joseph C. The cultural psychology of the emotions: Ancient and renewed. Handbook of emotions, 3rd ed. New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press; 2008. pp. 409–427.
69. Fiske AP, Seibt B, Schubert T. The sudden devotion emotion: Kama Muta and the cultural practices whose function Is to evoke it. Emotion Review. 2017; 1754073917723167. doi: 10.1177/1754073917723167
70. Seibt B, Schubert TW, Zickfeld JH, Fiske AP. Interpersonal closeness and morality predict feelings of being moved. Emotion. 2017;17: 389–394. doi: 10.1037/emo0000271 28150953
71. Zickfeld JH, Schubert TW, Seibt B, Fiske AP. Empathic concern is part of a more general communal emotion. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017;8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00723 28539901
72. Piff PK, Dietze P, Feinberg M, Stancato DM, Keltner D. Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2015;108: 883–899. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000018 25984788
73. Stellar JE, Gordon AM, Piff PK, Cordaro D, Anderson CL, Bai Y, et al. Self-Transcendent Emotions and Their Social Functions: Compassion, Gratitude, and Awe Bind Us to Others Through Prosociality. Emotion Review. 2017;9: 200–207. doi: 10.1177/1754073916684557
74. Keltner D, Haidt J. Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and Emotion. 2003;17: 297–314. doi: 10.1080/02699930302297 29715721
75. Shiota MN, Keltner D, Mossman A. The nature of awe: Elicitors, appraisals, and effects on self-concept. Cognition and Emotion. 2007;21: 944–963. doi: 10.1080/02699930600923668
76. Nelson-Coffey SK, Ruberton PM, Chancellor J, Cornick JE, Blascovich J, Lyubomirsky S. The proximal experience of awe. Bastian B, editor. PLOS ONE. 2019;14: e0216780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216780 31121008
77. Holbrook C, Fessler DM, Navarrete CD. Looming large in others’ eyes: Racial stereotypes illuminate dual adaptations for representing threat versus prestige as physical size. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2016;37: 67–78. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.08.004
78. Fessler DMT. From appeasement to conformity: Evolutionary and cultural perspectives on shame, competition, and cooperation. In: Tracy JL, Robins RW, Tangney JP, editors. The Self-conscious Emotions: Theory and Research. Guilford Press; 2007.
79. Tangney JP, Wagner P, Fletcher C, Gramzow R. Shamed into anger? The relation of shame and guilt to anger and self-reported aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992;62: 669–675. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.62.4.669 1583590
80. Fessler DMT, Sparks AM, Samore T, Holbrook C. Does observing reciprocity or exploitation affect elevation, a mechanism driving prosociality? Evolutionary Human Sciences. 2019;1. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2019.3
81. Hagen EH, Hammerstein P. Game theory and human evolution: A critique of some recent interpretations of experimental games. Theoretical Population Biology. 2006;69: 339–348. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2005.09.005 16458945
82. Haley KJ, Fessler DMT. Nobody’s watching?: Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2005;26: 245–256. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.01.002
83. Sparks A, Barclay P. Eye images increase generosity, but not for long: The limited effect of a false cue. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2013;34: 317–322. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.05.001
84. Sugiyama MS. Food, foragers, and folklore: The role of narrative in human subsistence. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2001;22: 221–240. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00063-0
85. Sparks, Adam Maxwell, Fessler, Daniel M. T., Tiokhin, Leonid, Ojigho D, Holbrook, Colin. Preliminary studies of elevation–a prosocial emotion–in rural West Sumatra and urban Ghana.
86. Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD. An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review. 1995;20: 709–734. doi: 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
87. Mikulincer M. Attachment working models and the sense of trust: An exploration of interaction goals and affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998;74: 1209–1224. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1209
88. Hilbig BE, Zettler I, Leist F, Heydasch T. It takes two: Honesty–Humility and Agreeableness differentially predict active versus reactive cooperation. Personality and Individual Differences. 2013;54: 598–603. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.008
Článok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 12
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Nejasný stín na plicích – kazuistika
- Masturbační chování žen v ČR − dotazníková studie
- Těžké menstruační krvácení může značit poruchu krevní srážlivosti. Jaký management vyšetření a léčby je v takovém případě vhodný?
- Fixní kombinace paracetamol/kodein nabízí synergické analgetické účinky
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Methylsulfonylmethane increases osteogenesis and regulates the mineralization of the matrix by transglutaminase 2 in SHED cells
- Oregano powder reduces Streptococcus and increases SCFA concentration in a mixed bacterial culture assay
- The characteristic of patulous eustachian tube patients diagnosed by the JOS diagnostic criteria
- Parametric CAD modeling for open source scientific hardware: Comparing OpenSCAD and FreeCAD Python scripts