Territoriality and the organization of technology during the Last Glacial Maximum in southwestern Europe

English version

Autoři: João Cascalheira ^aff001
Působiště autorů: ICArEHB, University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal ^aff001
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225828

Souhrn

Climate changes that occurred during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) had significant consequences in human eco-dynamics across Europe. Among the most striking impacts are the demographic contraction of modern humans into southern refugia and the potential formation of a population bottleneck. In Iberia and southern France transformations also included the occurrence of significant technological changes, mostly marked by the emergence of a diverse set of bifacially-shaped stone projectiles. The rapid dissemination of bifacial technologies and the geographical circumscription of specific projectile morphologies within these regions have been regarded as evidence for: (1) the existence of a system of long-distance exchange and social alliance networks; (2) the organization of human groups into cultural facies with well-defined stylistic territorial boundaries. However, the degree and modes in which cultural transmission have occurred within these territories, and how it may have influenced other domains of the adaptive systems, remains largely unknown. Using southern Iberia as a case-study, this paper presents the first quantitative approach to the organization of lithic technology and its relationship to hunter-gatherers’ territorial organization during the LGM. Similarities and dissimilarities in the presence of morphological and metric data describing lithic technologies are used as a proxy to explore modes and degrees of cultural transmission. Statistical results show that similarities in technological options are dependent on the chronology and geographical distance between sites and corroborate previous arguments for the organization of LGM settlement in Southern Iberia into discrete eco-cultural facies.

Klíčová slova:

Europe – Analysis of variance – Culture – Paleoanthropology – Archaeological dating – Radioactive carbon dating – Raw materials – Lithic technology

Zdroje

1. Clark PU, Dyke AS, Shakun JD, Carlson AE, Clark J, Wohlfarth B, et al. The Last Glacial Maximum. Science. 2009;325: 710–714. doi: 10.1126/science.1172873 19661421

2. Hughes PD, Gibbard PL, Ehlers J. Timing of glaciation during the last glacial cycle: Evaluating the concept of a global “Last Glacial Maximum” (LGM). Earth-Science Reviews. 2013;125: 171–198. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.07.003

3. Mix AC, Bard E, Schneider R. Environmental processes of the ice age: Land, oceans, glaciers (EPILOG). Quaternary Science Reviews. 2001;20: 627–657. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(00)00145-1

4. Banks WE, d’Errico F, Peterson AT, Vanhaeren M, Kageyama M, Sepulchre P, et al. Human ecological niches and ranges during the LGM in Europe derived from an application of eco-cultural niche modeling. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2008;35: 481–491. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2007.05.011

5. Bocquet-Appel J-P, Demars P-Y. Population Kinetics in the Upper Palaeolithic in Western Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2000;27: 551–570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1999.0471

6. Bradtmöller M, Pastoors A, Weninger B, Weniger G-C. The repeated replacement model–Rapid climate change and population dynamics in Late Pleistocene Europe. Quaternary International. 2012;247: 38–49. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.10.015

7. Burke A, Levavasseur G, James PM, Guiducci D, Izquierdo MA, Bourgeon L, et al. Exploring the impact of climate variability during the Last Glacial Maximum on the pattern of human occupation of Iberia. Journal of Human Evolution. 2014;73: 35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.06.003 25034085

8. d’Errico F, Sánchez Goñi MF. Neandertal extinction and the millennial scale climatic variability of OIS 3. Quaternary Science Reviews. 2003;22: 769–788. doi: 10.1016/S0277-3791(03)00009-X

9. Jochim M. Late Pleistocene refugia in Europe. In: Soffer O, editor. The Pleistocene Old World Regional Perspectives. New York: Plenum Press; 1987. pp. 317–331.

10. Straus LG, Clark GA. La Riera Cave: Stone Age Hunter-Gatherer Adaptations in Northern Spain. Anthropological Research Papers No. 36. Tempe: Arizona State University; 1986.

11. Straus LG. Southwestern Europe at the Last Glacial Maximum. Current Anthropology. 1991;32: 189–199.

12. Barbujani G, Bertorelle G, Chikhi L. Evidence for Paleolithic and Neolithic gene flow in Europe. American journal of human genetics. 1998;62: 488–492. doi: 10.1086/301719 9463326

13. Keinan A, Mullikin JC, Patterson N, Reich D. Measurement of the human allele frequency spectrum demonstrates greater genetic drift in East Asians than in Europeans. Nat Genet. 2007;39: 1251–1255. http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v39/n10/suppinfo/ng2116_S1.html doi: 10.1038/ng2116 17828266

14. Torroni A, Bandelt H-J, Macaulay V, Richards M, Cruciani F, Rengo C, et al. A Signal, from Human mtDNA, of Postglacial Recolonization in Europe. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 2001;69: 844–852. doi: 10.1086/323485 11517423

15. Smith P. Le Solutréen en France. Bourdeaux: Delmas; 1966.

16. d’Errico F, Sánchez-Goñi M-F, Vanhaeren M. L’impact de la variabilité climatique rapide des OIS3–2 sur le peuplement de l’Europe. L’Homme face au Climat, Bard, E(Ed) Odile Jacob, Paris. 2006; 265–282.

17. Renard C. Continuity or discontinuity in the Late Glacial Maximum of south-western Europe: The formation of the Solutrean in France. World Archaeology. 2011;43: 726–743. doi: 10.1080/00438243.2011.624789

18. Villaverde V, Aura JE, Barton CM. The Upper Paleolithic in Mediterranean Spain: A review of current evidence. Journal of World Prehistory. 1998;12: 121–198.

19. Aubry T, Almeida M, Neves MJ, Walter B. Solutrean laurel leaf point production and raw material procurement during the Last Glacial Maximum in southern Europe: Two examples from Central France and Portugal. Multiple approaches to the study of bifacial technologies. 2003; 165.

20. Straus LG. A Quarter-Century of Research on the Solutrean of Vasco-Cantabria, Iberia and beyond. Journal of Anthropological Research. 2000;56: 39–58.

21. Zilhão J. Seeing the leaves and not missing the forest: A portuguese perspective of the Solutrean. In: Pastoors A, Auffermann B, editors. Pleistocene foragers on the Iberian Peninsula: Their culture and environment. Mettmann: Neanderthal Museum; 2013. pp. 201–216.

22. Straus LG. Pointes solutréennes et l’hypothèse de territorialisme. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française Comptes rendus des séances mensuelles. 1977;74: 206–212. doi: 10.2307/27916884

23. Tiffagom M. De la pierre à l’Homme. Essai sur une Paléoanthropologie Solutréenne. Liège: ERAUL; 2006.

24. Zilhão J. O Paleolítico Superior da Estremadura portuguesa. Lisbon: Colibri; 1997.

25. Banks WE, Zilhão J, d’Errico F, Kageyama M, Sima A, Ronchitelli A. Investigating links between ecology and bifacial tool types in Western Europe during the Last Glacial Maximum. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2009;36: 2853–2867. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2009.09.014

26. Bicho N. Fashion and glamour: Weaponry and beads as territorial markers in Southern Iberia. In: Djindjian F, Kozlowski JK, Bicho N, editors. Le concept de territoires dans le Paléolithique Supérieur Européen (BAR International Series 1938). Oxford: J. & E. Hedges Ltd. 2009. pp. 243–251.

27. Cascalheira J. A influência mediterrânica nas redes sociais do Solutrense final peninsular. Ph.D. thesis, Universidade do Algarve. 2013.

28. Straus LG. El Solutrense: 40 Anos de Reflexiones por un Arqueologo Norteamericano. Espacio Tiempo y Forma Serie I, Prehistoria y Arqueología. 2013;1.

29. Sinclair A. The technique as a symbol in Late Glacial Europe. World Archaeology. 1995;27: 50–62.

30. Straus LG. The Original Arms Race: Iberian Perspective on the Solutrean Phenomenon. Etudes et Recherches Archéologiques de l’Université de Liège. 1990; 425–447.

31. Bar-Yosef O. The Upper Paleolithic Revolution. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2002;31: 363–393. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085416

32. Villaverde V, Peña P. Piezas con escotadura del Paleolitico Superior Valenciano. Valencia: Servicio de Investigación Prehistorica; 1981.

33. Fullola JM. Les pièces à ailerons et pédoncule comme élément différentiel du Solutréen Ibérique. In: Otte M, editor. La signification culturelle des industries lithiques Actes du Colloque de Liège du 3 au 7 octobre 1984 (BAR International Series 239). Oxford: J. & E. Hedges Ltd. 1985. pp. 222–232.

34. Pericot L. La Cueva del Parpalló (Gandía, Valencia). Madrid: Publicaciones C.S.I.C. Instituto Diego Velázquez; 1942.

35. Cascalheira J. Tecnologia lítica do abrigo Solutrense de Vale Boi. Lisbon: UNIARQ; 2010.

36. Schmidt I. Solutrean Points of the Iberian Peninsula: Tool Making and Using Behaviour of Hunter-gatherers During the Last Glacial Maximum. British Archaeological Reports Limited; 2015.

37. Bicho N, Simón Vallejo MD, Cortés Sánchez M. A Solutrean zoomorphic engraved plaquette from the site of Vale Boi, Portugal. Quartär. 2012;59: 153–164.

38. Bicho N, Carvalho AF, González-Sainz C, Sanchidrián JL, Villaverde V, Straus LG. The Upper Paleolithic Rock Art of Iberia. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 2007;14: 81–151. doi: 10.1007/s10816-007-9025-5

39. Simón Vallejo MD, Cortés Sánchez M, Bicho N. Primeras evidencias de arte mueble paleolítico en el sur de Portugal. Trabajos de Prehistoria. 2012;69: 7–20. doi: 10.3989/tp.2012.12076

40. Villaverde V. Arte paleolítico de la cova del Parpalló. Estudio de la colección de plaquetas y cantos grabados y pintados. Valencia: Servicio de Investigación Prehistórica de la Diputación Provincial de Valencia; 1994.

41. Zilhão J. Plaquette gravée du Solutréen supérieur de la Gruta do Caldeirão (Tomar, Portugal). Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française. 1988;85: 105–109.

42. Jordá F. El Solutrense en España y sus problemas. Oviedo: Diputación provincial de Asturias, Servicio de Investigaciones Arqueológicas; 1955.

43. Muñoz Ibañez FJ. Las puntas ligeras de proyectil del Solutrense Extracantábrico. Análisis tecnomorfológico e implicaciones funcionales. Madrid: UNED; 2000.

44. Zilhão J. La séquence chrono-stratigraphique du Solutréen portugais. Férvedes. 1994;1: 119–129.

45. Cascalheira J, Bicho N. On the Chronological Structure of the Solutrean in Southern Iberia. PloS one. 2015;10: e0137308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137308 26355459

46. Aura JE, Jorda Pardo JF, Fortea Perez FJ. La Cueva de Nerja (Málaga, España) y los inicios del Solutrense en Andalucía. Trabajos de Prehistoria. 2009;59: 69–108.

47. Cascalheira J, Bicho N, Marreiros J, Pereira T, Évora M, Cortés Sánchez M, et al. Vale Boi (Algarve, Portugal) and the Solutrean in Southwestern Iberia. Espacio, Tiempo y Forma. 2012;5: 455–467. doi: 10.5944/etfi.5.5376

48. Conkey MW, Beltrán A, Clark GA, Echegaray JG, Guenther MG, Hahn J, et al. The Identification of Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherer Aggregation Sites: The Case of Altamira [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology. 1980;21: 609–630. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2741828

49. Schmidt I, Bradtmöller M, Kehl M, Pastoors A, Tafelmaier Y, Weninger B, et al. Rapid climate change and variability of settlement patterns in Iberia during the Late Pleistocene. Quaternary International. 2012;274: 179–204. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.01.018

50. Straus LG, Bicho N, Winegardner A-C. The Upper Paleolithic settlement of Iberia: First generation maps. Antiquity. 2000;74: 553–566.

51. Aubry T, Almeida M. Analyse crtitique des bases chronostratigraphiques de la structuraction du Solutréen. In: SERAPVC, editor. Le Solutréen… 40 ans après Smith’66 Actes du colloque de Preuilly-sur-Claise, 47e Supplément à la Revue Archéologique du Centre de la France. Tours: ARCHEA/FERACF; 2013. pp. 37–52.

52. Cascalheira J. O Solutrense em Portugal: Novidades do século XXI. In: Arnaud J, Martins A, Neves C, editors. Arqueologia em Portugal—150 anos (Atas do I Congresso da Associação dos Arqueólogos Portugueses). Lisbon: Associação dos Arqueólogos Portugueses; 2013. pp. 269–276.

53. Ripoll Lopez S. La Cueva de Ambrosio (Vélez-Blanco, Almería) y su posición cronoestratigráfica en el Mediterráneo Occidental (BAR International Series 462). Oxford: J. & E. Hedges Ltd. 1988.

54. Barton CM, Villaverde V, Zilhão J, Aura JE, Garcia O, Badal E. In glacial environments beyond glacial terrains: Human eco-dynamics in late Pleistocene Mediterranean Iberia. Quaternary International. 2013;318: 53–68. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2013.05.007

55. Manne T, Cascalheira J, Évora M, Marreiros J, Bicho N. Intensive subsistence practices at Vale Boi, an Upper Paleolithic site in southwestern Portugal. Quaternary International. 2012;264: 83–99. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.02.026

56. Yravedra J. Zooarqueología y tafonomía en un yacimiento solutrense del sureste de la Península Ibérica: La Cueva de Ambrosio. SAGVNTVM Papeles del Laboratorio de Arqueología de Valencia. 2007;39: 65–83.

57. Straus LG. A new interpretation of the Cantabrian Solutrean. Current Anthropology. 1976;17: 342–343.

58. Straus LG. A study of the Solutrean in Vasco-Cantabrian Spain. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago. 1975.

59. Wiessner P. Reconsidering the behavioral basis for style: A case study among the Kalahari San. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1984;3: 190–234.

60. Wiessner P. Risk, reciprocity and social influences on! Kung San economics. Politics and history in band societies. 1982;61: 84.

61. Wiessner P. Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points. American Antiquity. 1983; 253–276.

62. Tostevin GB. Seeing lithics: A middle-range theory for testing for cultural transmission in the pleistocene. Oakville, CT: Oxbow Books; 2013.

63. Tostevin GB. Social intimacy, artefact visibility, and acculturation models of Neanderthal–modern human interaction. Rethinking the human revolution: new behavioural and biological perspectives on the origins and dispersal of modern humans. 2007; 341–357.

64. Tiffagom M. El Solutrense de facies ibérica o la cuestión de los contactos Trans-mediterráneos (Europa, África) en el Último Máximo Glaciar. 2005. p. e010.

65. Carr C. Building a Unified Middle-Range Theory of Artifact Design. In: Carr C, Neitzel JE, editors. Style, Society, and Person. Boston, MA: Springer US; 1995. pp. 151–170. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-1097-4_6

66. Carr C. A Unified Middle-Range Theory of Artifact Design. In: Carr C, Neitzel JE, editors. Style, Society, and Person. Boston, MA: Springer US; 1995. pp. 171–258. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-1097-4_7

67. Lechtman H. Style in Technology, Some Early Thoughts. In: Lechtman H, Merill R, editors. Material Culture Styles, Organisation, and Dynamics of Technology. St. Paul: West Publishing; 1975. pp. 3–20.

68. Sackett JR. Style and ethnicity in archaeology: The case for isochrestism. In: Conkey MW, Hastorf C, editors. The uses of style in archaeology: Some Historical and Theoretical Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. pp. 32–43.

69. Wiessner P. Seeking guidelines through an evolutionary approach: Style revisited among the! Kung San (Ju/’hoansi) of the 1990s. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association. 1997;7: 157–176.

70. Bird DW, O’Connell JF. Behavioral ecology and archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research. 2006;14: 143–188.

71. Boyd R, Richerson PJ. Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press; 1985.

72. Broughton JM, O’Connell JF. On evolutionary ecology, selectionist archaeology, and behavioral archaeology. American Antiquity. 1999; 153–165.

73. Kuhn S. Evolutionary perspectives on technology and technological change. World Archaeology. 2004;36: 561–570. doi: 10.1080/0043824042000303737

74. Dibble HL, Whittaker JC. New experimental evidence on the relation between percussion flaking and flake variation. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1981;8: 283–296.

75. Pelcin AW. The effect of indentor type on flake attributes: Evidence from a controlled experiment. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1997;24: 613–621.

76. Pelcin AW. The effect of core surface morphology on flake attributes: Evidence from a controlled experiment. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1997;24: 749–756.

77. Pelcin AW. The formation of flakes: The role of platform thickness and exterior platform angle in the production of flake initiations and terminations. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1997;24: 1107–1113.

78. Sackett JR. Approaches to style in lithic archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1982;1: 59–112.

79. Sackett JR. Style, function, and assemblage variability: A reply to Binford. American Antiquity. 1986; 628–634.

80. Premo L, Scholnick J. The spatial scale of social learning affects cultural diversity. American Antiquity. 2011;76: 163–176.

81. Scholnick JB. The spatial and temporal diffusion of stylistic innovations in material culture. Advances in Complex Systems. 2012;15: 1150010.

82. Shennan SJ, Crema ER, Kerig T. Isolation-by-distance, homophily, and “core” vs. “Package” cultural evolution models in Neolithic Europe. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2015;36: 103–109. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.09.006

83. Henrich J. Demography and Cultural Evolution: How Adaptive Cultural Processes Can Produce Maladaptive Losses—The Tasmanian Case. American Antiquity. 2004;69: 197–214. doi: 10.2307/4128416

84. Scerri EM, Groucutt HS, Jennings RP, Petraglia MD. Unexpected technological heterogeneity in northern Arabia indicates complex Late Pleistocene demography at the gateway to Asia. Journal of human evolution. 2014;75: 125–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.07.002 25110207

85. Shennan S. Demography and cultural innovation: A model and its implications for the emergence of modern human culture. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 2001;11: 5–16.

86. Nelson MC. The study of technological organization. Archaeological method and theory. 1991;3: 57–100.

87. Zilhão J, Real F, Carvalho E. Estratigrafia e cronologia da estaçao solutrense de Vale Almoinha (Cambelas, Torres Vedras). Arqueologo Português. 1987;5: 21–35.

88. Zilhão J. O Solutrense superior de fácies cantábrica de Vale Almoinha (Cambelas, Torres Vedras). O Arqueólogo Português. 1984;4: 15–86.

89. Bicho N, Cascalheira J, Marreiros J. On the (L)Edge: The Case of Vale Boi Rockshelter (Algarve, Southern Portugal). In: Bergsvik KA, Skeates R, editors. Caves in Context—The Cultural Significance of Caves and Rockshelters in Europe. Oxbow Books; 2012.

90. Manne T. Early Upper Paleolithic bone processing and insights into small-scale storage of fats at Vale Boi, southern Iberia. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2014;43: 111–123. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.12.003

91. Ripoll Lopez S, Muñoz FJ, Pérez S, Muñiz M, Calleja F, Martos JA, et al. Arte rupestre paleolítico en el yacimiento solutrense de la Cueva de Ambrosio (Vélez-Blanco, Almería). Trabajos de Prehistoria. 1994;51: 21–39.

92. Pereira T, Cascalheira J, Marreiros J, Almeida F, Bicho N. Variation in quartzite exploitation during the Upper Palaeolithic of Southwest Iberian Peninsula. Trabajos de Prehistoria. 2013;69: 232–256. doi: 10.3989/tp.2012.12090

93. Scerri EML. The Aterian and its place in the North African Middle Stone Age. Quaternary International. 2013;300: 111–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2012.09.008

94. Andrefsky W Jr. Lithics: Macroscopic approaches to analysis. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.

95. Inizan M-L, Reduron-Ballinger M, Roche H, Tixier J, Féblot-Augustins J. Technology and terminology of knapped stone. Nanterre: CREP; 1999.

96. Cotterell B, Kamminga J. The Formation of Flakes. American Antiquity. 1987;52: 675–708. doi: 10.2307/281378

97. Dibble HL, Pelcin A. The Effect of Hammer Mass and Velocity on Flake Mass. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1995;22: 429–439. doi: 10.1006/jasc.1995.0042

98. Dibble HL, Rezek Z. Introducing a new experimental design for controlled studies of flake formation: Results for exterior platform angle, platform depth, angle of blow, velocity, and force. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2009;36: 1945–1954. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2009.05.004

99. Pelcin AW. The Threshold Effect of Platform Width: A Reply to Davis and Shea. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1998;25: 615–620. doi: 10.1006/jasc.1997.0253

100. Režek Ž, Lin S, Iovita R, Dibble HL. The relative effects of core surface morphology on flake shape and other attributes. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2011;38: 1346–1359. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.01.014

101. Režek Ž, Dibble HL, McPherron SP, Braun DR, Lin SC. Two million years of flaking stone and the evolutionary efficiency of stone tool technology. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2018;2: 628–633. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0488-4 29507377

102. Mair P, Wilcox R. Robust Statistical Methods: The R Package WRS2. 2016; 22.

103. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013. Available: http://www.R-project.org/

104. Marwick B, Boettiger C, Mullen L. Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician. 2017; 0–0. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986

105. Wickham H. R packages: Organize, test, document, and share your code. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc. 2015.

106. Marwick B. Computational Reproducibility in Archaeological Research: Basic Principles and a Case Study of Their Implementation. J Archaeol Method Theory. 2016;24: 424–450. doi: 10.1007/s10816-015-9272-9

107. Bicho N. Technological change in the final upper paleolithic of Rio Maior, Portuguese Estremadura. Southern Methodist University. 1992.

108. Tixier J. Typologie de l’Epipaléolithique du Maghreb. Mémoires du Centre de Recherches Anthropologiques, Préhistoriques et Ethnographiques, No 2. Paris: Arts et Métiers Graphiques. 1963;

109. Henry DO. Correlations between Reduction Strategies and Settlement Patterns. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association. 1989;1: 139–155. doi: 10.1525/ap3a.1989.1.1.139

110. Marks AE. The curation of stone tools during the Upper Pleistocene: A view from the Central Negev, Israel. University Museum Press, Philadelphia; 1988.

111. Newcomer MH. Some quantitative experiments in handaxe manufacture. World Archaeology. 1971;3: 85–94. doi: 10.1080/00438243.1971.9979493

112. Marwick B. What attributes are important for the measurement of assemblage reduction intensity? Results from an experimental stone artefact assemblage with relevance to the Hoabinhian of mainland Southeast Asia. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2008;35: 1189–1200. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2007.08.007

113. Pelcin AW. Controlled experiments in the production of flake attributes. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania. 1996.

114. Macgregor O. Abrupt terminations and stone artefact reduction potential. Lithics’ Down Under’: Australian perspectives on lithic reduction, use and classification. Archaeopress; 2005.

115. Fullola JM. Las industrias líticas del Paleolítico Superior ibérico. Valencia: Servicio de Investigación Prehistórica de la Diputación Provincial de Valencia; 1979.

116. Aura JE. Solutrenses y Magdalenienses al Sur del Ebro. Primera aproximación a un proceso de cambio tecno-industrial: El ejemplo de Parpalló. Saguntum. 1989;22: 35–65.

117. Parry WJ. Expedient core technology and sedentism. The organization of core technology. 1987; 285–304.

118. Stout D, Apel J, Commander J, Roberts M. Late Acheulean technology and cognition at Boxgrove, UK. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2014;41: 576–590. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.10.001

119. Crema ER, Kerig T, Shennan S. Culture, space, and metapopulation: A simulation-based study for evaluating signals of blending and branching. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2014;43: 289–298. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2014.01.002

120. Bentley RA, Caiado CCS, Ormerod P. Effects of memory on spatial heterogeneity in neutrally transmitted culture. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2014;35: 257–263. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.02.001

121. Marreiros J, Bicho N, Gibaja J, Pereira T, Cascalheira J. Lithic technology from the Gravettian of Vale Boi: New insights into Early Upper Paleolithic human behavior in Southern Iberian Peninsula. Quaternary International. 2015;359–360: 479–498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2014.06.074

122. Pereira T, Bicho N, Cascalheira J, Infantini L, Marreiros J, Paixão E, et al. Territory and abiotic resources between 33 and 15.6 ka at Vale Boi (SW Portugal). Quaternary International. 2016;412, Part A: 124–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.08.071

123. Andrefsky W Jr. Raw-material availability and the organization of technology. American Antiquity. 1994; 21–34.

124. Sundstrom SM, Angeler DG, Garmestani AS, García JH, Allen CR. Transdisciplinary application of cross-scale resilience. Sustainability. 2014;6: 6925–6948.

125. Cascalheira J, Bicho N, Manne T, Horta P. Cross-scale adaptive behaviors during the Upper Paleolithic in Iberia: The example of Vale Boi (Southwestern Portugal). Quaternary International. 2017;446: 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.01.002.

126. Alcaraz-Castaño M, López-Recio M, Tapias F, Cuartero F, Baena J, Ruiz-Zapata B, et al. The human settlement of Central Iberia during MIS 2: New technological, chronological and environmental data from the Solutrean workshop of Las Delicias (Manzanares River valley, Spain). Quaternary International. 2017;431: 104–124. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.06.069

Territoriality and the organization of technology during the Last Glacial Maximum in southwestern Europe

Souhrn

Klíčová slova:

Zdroje

PLOS One

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz