#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Comprehensive assessment of tissue and serum parameters of bone metabolism in a series of orthopaedic patients


Authors: Jan Gunsser aff001;  Regina Hermann aff002;  Andreas Roth aff003;  Amelie Lupp aff001
Authors place of work: Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany aff001;  Department of Internal Medicine 2, HELIOS Hospital Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany aff002;  Orthopaedic Professorship of the University Hospital Jena, Orthopaedic Department of the Waldkliniken, former Rudolf Elle Hospital, Eisenberg, Germany aff003;  Department of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, Division of Endoprosthetics/Orthopaedics, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany aff004
Published in the journal: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Category: Research Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227133

Summary

Bone diseases represent an increasing health burden worldwide, and basic research remains necessary to better understand the complexity of these pathologies and to improve and expand existing prevention and treatment approaches. In the present study, 216 bone samples from the caput femoris and collum femoris of 108 patients with degenerative or dysplastic coxarthrosis, hip fracture, or osteonecrosis were evaluated for the proportion of trabecular bone (TB) and expression of parathyroid hormone (PTH) type 1 receptor (PTH1R), osteoprotegerin (OPG), and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL). Serum levels of PTH, OPG, soluble RANKL (sRANKL), alkaline phosphatase (AP), osteocalcin, total procollagen type-1 intact N-terminal propeptide (TP1NP), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase type 5b (TRAP5b), sclerostin, and C-telopeptide of type-1 collagen (ICTP) were also determined. Age was positively correlated with serum levels of PTH, OPG, and sclerostin but negatively associated with TB and sRANKL. Women exhibited less TB, lower sclerostin and ICTP, and higher TRAP5b. Impaired kidney function was associated with shorter bone decalcification time, less TB, lower sRANKL, and higher serum PTH, OPG, and sclerostin. Furthermore, correlations were observed between bone PTH1R and OPG expression and between serum PTH, OPG, and AP. There were also positive correlations between serum OPG and TP1NP; serum OPG and sclerostin; serum AP, osteocalcin, and TRAP5b; and serum sclerostin and ICTP. Serum OPG was negatively associated with sRANKL. In summary, clear relationships between specific bone metabolism markers were observed, and distinct influences of age, sex, and kidney function, thus underscoring their suitability as diagnostic or prognostic markers.

Keywords:

osteocalcin – Bone remodeling – Creatinine – Glomerular filtration rate – Bone fracture – Osteocytes – Parathyroid hormone – Osteoblasts

Introduction

Bone diseases, such as osteoporosis, represent one of the major health problems worldwide. They are especially common in the elderly but may affect people of any age [13]. In addition to pain and deformity, fractures are a major complication of bone disease, leading to increased morbidity, reduced quality of life, and even death. The care of patients with bone diseases is very costly to society, and expenses will continue to rise as the frequency of bone diseases increases in the future with the anticipated growth of the elderly population. Therefore, despite modern prophylaxis and treatment options, basic research efforts are still necessary to better understand the complex pathologies of different bone diseases and to improve and expand treatment approaches.

Human bone undergoes constant remodelling, which is controlled by endocrine and paracrine signals. Osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoclasts represent the most important types of cells in bone, and these cells are controlled by many hormones. Without osteoblasts, no osteoclasts can be formed, so excessive bone loss is prevented. Osteoclastogenesis requires macrophage colony-stimulating factor and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), which is expressed by osteoblasts, as well as RANK, which is present on osteoclast precursor cells [4, 5]. Parathyroid hormone (PTH), vitamin D3, and oestrogens may influence the expression of RANKL. In its active form, PTH is an 84-amino acid peptide hormone, which is produced in the parathyroid glands. It plays an important role in calcium and phosphate homeostasis and provides rapid mobilization of calcium. In the kidneys, PTH promotes reabsorption of calcium and inhibits phosphate reuptake. In bone, PTH indirectly activates osteoclasts, thus leading to the release of calcium. These actions of PTH are mediated via the PTH type 1 receptor (PTH1R), a plasma membrane-bound G protein-coupled receptor. Besides PTH1R another receptor exists, PTH2R, which has no importance in bone metabolism. Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a secretory, 380-amino acid glycoprotein belonging to the family of tumour necrosis factors/tumour necrosis factor receptors. In bone, OPG is secreted by osteoblasts and prevents RANK from binding to RANKL, thereby reducing recruitment, activation, and proliferation of osteoclasts [4, 6, 7].

Although the effects of many physiological and pathophysiological factors in specific bone diseases are well known, there is currently no comprehensive evaluation of the interrelationships between the various tissue and serum parameters of bone metabolism, as well as the changes that occur with age, sex, and kidney function, especially in humans.

In the present study, we assessed a panel of serum parameters of bone metabolism − the bone formation markers PTH, OPG, alkaline phosphatase (AP), osteocalcin, and total procollagen type-1 intact N-terminal propeptide (TP1NP), the bone resorption markers tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase type 5b (TRAP5b), soluble RANKL (sRANKL), and C-telopeptide of type-1 collagen (ICTP), and sclerostin, which exerts anti-anabolic effects on bone formation, − in a consecutively recruited series of orthopaedic patients who underwent hip replacement surgery. These parameters were evaluated for possible interrelationships, and correlated with bone histomorphology; bone PTH1R, OPG, and RANKL expression; and clinical data, such as age, sex, serum calcium and kidney function.

Materials and methods

Bone and serum samples

A total of 216 bone samples were obtained from 108 patients who underwent hip replacement surgery in the Rudolf Elle Hospital, Eisenberg, Germany, during 2010 and 2011. The patients were recruited consecutively and thus represent the typical clientele of such a medium-sized clinic. The specimens were obtained from the caput femoris (samples A, containing an additional layer of cartilage and cortical bone at the upper surface; n = 108) and collum femoris (samples B, consisting of primarily cancellous bone; n = 108). One specimen from each location was retrieved from each patient, thus allowing for an evaluation of the effects of age, sex or kidney function on cortical and cancellous bone separately. For standardization, the sampling was always carried out by the same surgeon (AR). Two punching cylinders with a diameter of 6 mm and a length of 20 mm were removed always at the same place of the coxal femur end using a cannulated reamer (Medicon, Tuttlingen, Germany). One cylinder was removed in the main superior loading zone of the femoral head, perpendicular to the surface. After resection of the hip head in the middle of the thigh neck, the second sample was taken centrally from the marrow area of the femur in the course of the rest of the thigh neck. The bones samples were placed in 10% buffered formalin immediately after removal, where they remained for several weeks until further processing. Additionally, blood was drawn from the patients during surgery, serum was prepared according to a standardized protocol, snap-frozen and stored at –80°C until analysis. Demographic and clinical data, such as age, sex, serum calcium, serum creatinine, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR), were retrieved from the patients’ records. The indications for surgery were mostly degenerative coxarthrosis (n = 92), followed by dysplastic coxarthrosis (n = 9), hip fracture (n = 5), and osteonecrosis (n = 2). Of the 216 bone samples, 120 were from the right caput/collum femoris and 96 were from the left caput/collum femoris.

All procedures involving human participants were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committees, as well as the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. Permission was obtained from the local ethics committee (Ethikkommission des Universitätsklinikums Jena) for the study. Written informed consent for the use of tissue and serum samples for scientific purposes was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All data were analyzed anonymously.

Histological methods

The bone samples were decalcified at room temperature using an ethylene-diamine-tetraacetic acid-containing solution (Osteosoft®, Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). The solution was exchanged every 3 days. After being put in the decalcification solution, the start time was noted and the samples were daily checked for their consistency. After successful decalcification, the end time was noted again. Decalcification time varied between 1 and 8 weeks, depending on the consistency of the bone. Following decalcification, the samples were dehydrated in graded ethanol and embedded in paraffin blocks. From these blocks, 4-μm sections were prepared using a microtome (Microm HM 335 E, Microm, Walldorf, Germany) and floated onto positively-charged slides.

Sections of each sample were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) according to standard laboratory protocols or by immunohistochemistry. Immunostaining was performed using an indirect peroxidase labelling method, as described previously [8]. Briefly, sections were dewaxed, microwaved in 10 mM citric acid (pH 6.0) for 16 min at 600 W, and then incubated overnight at 4°C with a polyclonal rabbit anti-human PTH1R antibody (antibody 1781; 0.1 μg/mL; Gramsch Laboratories, Schwabhausen, Germany), which was developed and extensively characterized by our group recently [9], a monoclonal mouse-anti-human OPG antibody (clone 5G2, Acris Antibodies, Herford, Germany; dilution, 1:100), or a mouse monoclonal anti-human RANKL antibody (clone 12A668; Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY, USA; dilution, 1:750). Detection of the primary antibodies was performed using a biotinylated anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG, followed by incubation with peroxidase-conjugated avidin (Vector ABC “Elite” kit; Vector, Burlingame, CA, USA). Binding of the primary antibodies was visualized using 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole in acetate buffer (BioGenex, San Ramon, CA, USA). Sections were then rinsed, counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin, and mounted in Vectamount® mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Sections from human kidney (PTH1R, OPG), human placenta (OPG), and human duodenum (RANKL) served as positive controls. As negative control, the primary antibody was either omitted (OPG, RANKL, PTH1R) or adsorbed for 2 h at room temperature with 10 μg/ml of the peptide used for immunizations (PTH1R).

The proportion of trabecular structures within each bone sample was determined in the HE-stained samples at 100x magnification by means of the point counting method according to Bressot et al. [10] with slight modifications, using a 20 x 20 (1 cm x 1 cm) grid. Fifty visual fields were counted in each section, and an arithmetic mean was calculated.

Immunohistochemical stainings were scored using the semiquantitative Immunoreactivity Score (IRS) according to Remmele and Stegner [11], with separate scores calculated for osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoclasts. IRS was determined by multiplying the percentage of positive cells, stratified into five gradations (0, no positive cells; 1, <10% positive cells; 2, 10–50% positive cells; 3, 51–80% positive cells; 4, >80% positive cells), by the intensity of staining, stratified into four gradations (0, no staining; 1, mild staining; 2, moderate staining; 3, strong staining). IRS values ranged from 0 to 12. Decalcification time did not affect the immunohistochemical staining results (samples A: -0.054 < Spearman correlation coefficient (rsp) < 0.123; p > 0.206; samples B: -0.160 < rsp < 0.098; p > 0.311). All immunohistochemical stainings were evaluated by two independent blinded investigators (JG, AL). In case of discrepant scores, final decision was achieved by consensus.

Analysis of serum parameters

Serum levels of PTH, OPG, sRANKL, AP, osteocalcin, TRAP5b, TP1NP, ICTP, and sclerostin were determined using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions: PTH 1–84, human; OPG, human Quidel®; sRANKL, human, high sensitive; TRAP5b, MicroVue; Osteocalcin, MicroVue; Sclerostin (TECOmedical AG, Sissach, Switzerland); Alkaline Phosphatase ELISA Kit (Biotrend Chemikalien GmbH, Cologne, Germany); TP1NP (MyBioSource, San Diego, CA, USA); and human C-telopeptide of procollagen (ICTP) (Biozol, Eching, Germany). With the only exception of the AP kit, all kits contained low and high control sera, which were measured in parallel to the test samples. In case of AP, normal and pathological control sera were obtained from Biomed (Oberschleißheim, Germany) and used as positive controls.

Statistics

The IBM SPSS statistics program version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all analyses. Because the data were not normally distributed (according to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test), these tests were used: Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon, Chi-square, Spearman’s rank correlation, and Kendall’s τ-b. A p value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data are shown as median and interquartile range or as arithmetic mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).

Results

Patient characteristics

Samples were obtained from 49 men and 59 women, with differences in sex distribution between the four diagnosis groups (Table 1). In patients with coxarthrosis, female sex prevailed, whereas in the few patients with a hip fracture and dysplastic coxarthrosis, an approximately equal sex distribution was observed. Osteonecrosis was present only in men. The median patient age was 68 years overall (range, 37−89 years). The patients were distributed over the age groups as follows: 30−39 (n = 1), 40−49 (n = 7), 50−59 (n = 22), 60−69 (n = 26), 70−79 (n = 43), 80−89 (n = 9). The age was the highest in patients with a hip fracture and the lowest in patients with osteonecrosis and dysplastic coxarthrosis (Table 1).

Tab. 1. Patient characteristics (n = 108).
Patient characteristics (n = 108).

Tissue and serum parameters of bone metabolism

Bone decalcification time and histologic parameters

Decalcification time (as a measure of bone mineralization and bone density) was significantly longer for samples A, which contained an additional layer of cartilage and cortical bone (median, 24 days; range, 3−228 days) than for samples B, which consisted mainly of cancellous bone (7 days; 3–99 days; Wilcoxon, p < 0.001). There was no correlation in the decalcification time between the samples A and B and no association between the decalcification time of the samples A or B and patient age or sex. There was no correlation between decalcification time and serum calcium or creatinine or GFR. In samples B, however, decalcification time was significantly shorter in patients with stage 3 renal insufficiency (mean, 6.20 ± 1.07 days) than in patients with stage 1 disease (11.61 ± 2.29 days) or stage 2 disease (11.49 ± 1.81 days; Mann-Whitney, p = 0.052 and 0.004, respectively).

The mean proportion of trabecular bone was 34.1% ± 10.4% in samples A and 21.3% ± 9.8% in samples B. Again, no correlation between the values of the samples A and B was observed. There was, however, a significant inverse correlation between the proportion of trabecular bone in samples A and patient age (rsp = -0.196, p = 0.042; Fig 1A). Furthermore, in samples A, the proportion was significantly lower in women (mean, 34.4% ± 1.4%) than in men (38.3% ± 1.4%; Mann-Whitney, p = 0.021; Fig 2A). There was no correlation between the proportion of trabecular bone and serum calcium, but in samples B, the proportion was significantly lower in patients with an elevated creatinine (mean, 16.5% ± 1.8%) than in those with a normal creatinine (22.3% ± 1.0%; Mann-Whitney, p = 0.025; Fig 3A).

Fig. 1. Influence of age on bone turnover markers.
Influence of age on bone turnover markers.
A) Percentage of trabecular mass in bone samples A, B) serum parathyroid hormone (PTH), C) serum osteoprotegerin (OPG), and D) serum soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (sRANKL). Depicted are median values, upper and lower quartiles, minimum and maximum values, and outliers. The outliers are represented as circles for mild outliers (values 1.5–3 times above the upper quartile or below the lower quartile) and as asterisks for extreme outliers (data > 3 times above the upper quartile or below the lower quartile).
Fig. 2. Influence of sex on bone turnover markers.
Influence of sex on bone turnover markers.
A) Percentage of trabecular mass in bone samples A, B) serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase type 5b (TRAP5b), C) serum sclerostin, and D) serum C-telopeptide of type-1 collagen (ICTP). Depicted are median values, upper and lower quartiles, minimum and maximum values, and outliers. The outliers are represented as circles for mild outliers (values 1.5–3 times above the upper quartile or below the lower quartile) and as asterisks for extreme outliers (data > 3 times above the upper quartile or below the lower quartile).
Fig. 3. Influence of kidney function, as represented by normal or elevated serum creatinine, on bone turnover markers.
Influence of kidney function, as represented by normal or elevated serum creatinine, on bone turnover markers.
Elevated creatinine values were defined as values > 97 μmol/L in women and > 106 μmol/L in men. A) Percentage of trabecular mass in bone samples B, B) serum parathyroid hormone (PTH), C) serum osteoprotegerin (OPG), and D) serum sclerostin. Depicted are median values, upper and lower quartiles, minimum and maximum values, and outliers. The outliers are represented as circles for mild outliers (values 1.5–3 times above the upper quartile or below the lower quartile) and as asterisks for extreme outliers (data > 3 times above the upper quartile or below the lower quartile).

PTH1R was expressed on the plasma membrane of osteoblasts and osteocytes but not osteoclasts. Overall, PTH1R expression was very low in the bone samples investigated. It was significantly higher on osteoblasts (mean IRS, 2.77 ± 0.19) than on osteocytes (0.50 ± 0.11; Wilcoxon, p < 0.001) in samples A+B and significantly higher on osteoblasts in samples B (mean IRS, 3.23 ± 0.25) than on osteoblasts in samples A (2.31 ± 0.27; Wilcoxon, p = 0.007). Nevertheless, there was a significant correlation between PTH1R expression on osteoblasts and osteocytes (samples A, rsp = 0.220, p = 0.022; samples B, rsp = 0.196, p = 0.043; samples A+B, rsp = 0.173, p = 0.073). In both samples A and B, PTH1R expression on osteoblasts and osteocytes was not associated with age, although the variability of PTH1R values increased with increasing age. PTH1R expression did not differ between men and women. Additionally, no association was observed between PTH1R expression and serum calcium or creatinine, GFR, or renal insufficiency stage.

Similar to PTH1R, OPG was only expressed on osteoblasts and osteocytes, but not on osteoclasts. Mean OPG IRS values were 4.69 ± 0.18 for osteoblasts and 4.37 ± 0.23 for osteocytes (in samples A+B), which were distinctly higher than the mean IRS values for PTH1R. There were no significant differences in OPG IRS values between samples A and B or between osteoblasts and osteocytes. However, a significant correlation between OPG expression on osteoblasts and osteocytes in samples A (rsp = 0.375, p < 0.001) and A+B (rsp = 0.273, p = 0.004) could be observed. Furthermore, OPG expression on osteocytes was negatively correlated with age (samples A+B, rsp = -0.233, p = 0.015) but there was no difference between female and male patients. There was no association between bone OPG expression and serum calcium or creatinine, GFR, or renal insufficiency stage.

RANKL expression was likewise only detected on osteoblasts and osteocytes. Mean RANKL IRS values (samples A+B) were significantly higher in osteoblasts (4.25 ± 0.21) than in osteocytes (2.27 ± 0.15; Wilcoxon, p < 0.001). They were also significantly higher in osteoblasts and osteocytes of samples B than in the corresponding cells of samples A (Wilcoxon, p < 0.001). There was no association between bone RANKL expression and age, sex, or renal insufficiency stage. RANKL expression was also not correlated with serum calcium or creatinine or GFR.

Serum parameters

Mean serum PTH was 27.29 ± 1.31 pg/mL. While serum PTH was significantly correlated with age (rsp = 0.288, p = 0.003; Fig 1B), it was not associated with sex or serum calcium. Serum PTH was, however, negatively correlated with GFR (rsp = -0.259, p = 0.008) and positively associated with serum creatinine (rsp = 0.202, p = 0.041). Accordingly, patients with an elevated creatinine or a reduced GFR had a significantly higher mean serum PTH (normal vs. elevated creatinine, 25.47 ± 1.17 pg/mL vs. 42.60 ± 7.07 pg/mL; Mann-Whitney, p = 0.018; Fig 3B; normal vs. reduced GFR, 25.63 ± 1.21 pg/mL vs. 36.53 ± 5.39 pg/mL; Mann-Whitney, p = 0.002).

Serum OPG was on average 5.12 ± 0.20 pmol/L. The values significantly correlated with age (rsp = 0.292, p = 0.003; Fig 1C), but there was no difference between female and male patients. Furthermore, serum OPG was negatively correlated with serum calcium (rsp = -0.213, p = 0.031). Although there was no association between serum OPG and absolute GFR or serum creatinine, there was a tendency towards higher mean OPG values in patients with an elevated serum creatinine (normal vs. elevated, 4.86 ± 0.20 pmol/L vs. 6.52 ± 0.79 pmol/L; Mann-Whitney, p = 0.053; Fig 3C) or reduced GFR (normal vs. reduced, 4.99 ± 0.22 pmol/L vs. 5.42 ± 0.57 pmol/L; Mann-Whitney, p = 0.082). Serum OPG values also differed according to stage of renal insufficiency (Kruskal-Wallis, p = 0.008). Here, OPG was significantly higher in patients with stage 3 renal insufficiency (mean, 6.81 ± 0.63 pmol/L) compared to those with stage 1 disease (4.75 ± 0.28 pmol/L) or stage 2 disease (4.78 ± 0.28 pmol/L; Mann-Whitney, p = 0.003 and 0.005, respectively).

Average serum sRANKL values amounted to 0.089 ± 0.008 pmol/l. The values negatively correlated with age (rsp = -0.289, p = 0.003; Fig 1D) but not sex. There was no correlation between serum sRANKL and serum calcium or creatinine or GFR, but there was a tendency towards a lower sRANKL in patients with stage 3 renal insufficiency (mean, 0.0996 ± 0.0125 pmol/L) than in those with stage 1 disease (0.0654 ± 0.0236 pmol/L; Mann-Whitney, p = 0.056).

Mean serum AP was 32.74 ± 1.13 ng/mL. There was no association with age, sex, serum calcium or creatinine, GFR, or renal insufficiency stage.

Mean serum osteocalcin values were on average 0.695 ± 0.004 ng/mL. Osteocalcin was not associated with sex, serum calcium or creatinine, GFR, or stage of renal insufficiency. There was, however, a tendency towards a higher osteocalcin in women (mean, 0.702 ± 0.039 ng/mL) than in men (0.685 ± 0.046 ng/mL; Wilcoxon, p = 0.052).

Average serum TP1NP values were 32.74 ± 5.30 ng/mL. Again, no influence of patient age, sex, serum calcium or creatinine, GFR, or renal insufficiency stage was observed.

Mean serum TRAP5b was 3.66 ± 0.15 U/L. TRAP5b was not associated with age, serum calcium or creatinine, GFR, or stage of renal insufficiency. There was, however, a significant difference in TRAP5b between sexes (Mann-Whitney, p = 0.003), with a higher mean value in women (4.03 ± 0.23 U/L) than in men (3.22 ± 0.16 U/L; Fig 2B).

Average serum sclerostin values amounted to 0.662 ± 0.028 ng/mL. Values displayed a significant association with age (rsp = 0.194; p = 0.048), as well as sex (Mann-Whitney, p < 0.001). In contrast to TRAP5b, sclerostin was lower in women (mean, 0.528 ± 0.023 ng/mL) than in men (0.832 ± 0.049 ng/mL; Fig 2C). Sclerostin was not associated with serum calcium. It was, however, positively correlated with serum creatinine (rsp = 0.478, p < 0.001) and negatively associated with GFR (rsp = -0.236, p = 0.016). Consequently, significantly higher sclerostin values were observed in patients with an elevated creatinine (mean, 0.883 ± 0.113 ng/mL) than in those with a normal creatinine (0.634 ± 0.029 ng/mL; Mann-Whitney, p = 0.008; Fig 3D). Sclerostin was also significantly higher in patients with stage 3 renal insufficiency (mean, 0.832 ± 0.096 ng/mL) compared to those with stage 1 disease (0.593 ± 0.035 ng/mL; Mann-Whitney, p = 0.022).

Mean serum ICTP was 311.78 ± 14.08 ng/mL. ICTP was not associated with age, serum calcium or creatinine, GFR, or renal insufficiency stage. As with sclerostin, ICTP was significantly lower in women (mean, 261.11 ± 18.58 ng/mL) than in men (364.54 ± 18.35 ng/mL; Mann-Whitney, p < 0.001; Fig 2D).

Correlations between bone metabolism parameters

In both samples A and B, the percentage of trabecular bone was significantly correlated with decalcification time (samples A, rsp = 0.422, p < 0.001; samples B, rsp = 0.233; p < 0.001).

No correlation was found between PTH1R expression and decalcification time or percentage of trabecular bone. However, OPG expression on osteocytes in samples A was significantly associated with decalcification time (rsp = 0.256, p = 0.008) and percentage of trabecular bone (rsp = 0.220, p = 0.022) of these samples. Additionally, there was a significant correlation between OPG expression and PTH1R expression on osteoblasts plus osteocytes in samples A+B (rsp = 0.283, p = 0.003), as well as on osteocytes in samples A+B (rsp = 0.336, p < 0.001), but no significant correlation on osteoblasts alone in samples A+B (rsp = 0.149, p = 0.124). Similar results were obtained when considering samples A and samples B separately.

RANKL expression on osteoblasts in samples A and samples A+B, as well as on osteocytes in samples A and on osteoblasts plus osteocytes in samples A+B, was negatively correlated with decalcification time (rsp = -0.252, p = 0.008; rsp = -0.201, p = 0.037; rsp = -0.353, p < 0.001; rsp = -0.258, p = 0.007, respectively). Additionally, significant negative associations were observed between the percentage of trabecular bone and RANKL expression on osteocytes in samples A (rsp = -0.274, p = 0.004), on osteocytes in samples A+B (rsp = -0.249, p = 0.009), and on osteoblasts plus osteocytes in samples A+B (rsp = -0,213, p = 0.027). Besides, RANKL expression on osteoblasts in samples A was positively correlated with PTH1R expression on these cells (rsp = 0.286, p = 0.003).

No correlations were observed between serum PTH, OPG, AP, osteocalcin, or sclerostin and decalcification time, percentage of trabecular bone, or expression of PTH1R, OPG, or RANKL. There were, however, significant positive associations between serum PTH and serum OPG (rsp = 0.268, p = 0.005; Table 2; Fig 4A), between serum PTH and AP (rsp = 0.279, p = 0.003), and between serum OPG and AP (rsp = 0.259, p = 0.007) (Table 2). A positive interrelationship was also observed between serum AP and osteocalcin (rsp = 0.314, p = 0.001; Table 2; Fig 4B). Serum TP1NP showed a correlation with OPG expression on osteoblasts (rsp = 0.195, p = 0.046), osteocytes (rsp = 0.404, p < 0.001), and osteoblasts plus osteocytes (rsp = 0.201, p = 0.039) in samples B as well as on osteoblasts plus osteocytes in samples A+B (rsp = 0.236, p = 0.016). Additionally, a positive association with serum OPG was noticed (rsp = 0.323, p = 0.001; Table 2). Serum TRAP5b was negatively correlated with trabecular mass in samples A (rsp = -0.238, p = 0.014), but showed a positive association with serum AP (rsp = 0.394, p < 0.001) and osteocalcin (rsp = 0.596, p < 0.001; Table 2; Fig 4C). Regarding sRANKL, a negative association with PTH1R expression on osteocytes in samples A (rsp = -0.200, p = 0.040) and samples A+B (rsp = 0.222, p = 0.023) was observed, but no correlation with bone OPG or RANKL expression. There was also a negative association between sRANKL and serum OPG (rsp = -0.432, p < 0.001; Table 2; Fig 4D) and a tendency towards a negative interrelationship between sRANKL and TP1NP (rsp = -0.160, p = 0.098; Table 2). Serum sclerostin was positively correlated with serum OPG (rsp = 0.254, p = 0.008; Table 2; Fig 4E) and exhibited also a tendency towards a positive association with serum PTH (rsp = 0.186; p = 0.054). Between the bone resorption marker ICTP and trabecular mass in samples A a significant positive correlation (rsp = 0.226, p = 0.020) was observed and a tendency towards an association between ICTP and trabecular mass in samples B (rsp = 0.193, p = 0.062) and samples A+B (rsp = 0.205, p = 0.051). There was also a positive correlation between serum ICTP and serum sclerostin (rsp = 0.290, p = 0.002; Table 2; Fig 4F).

Fig. 4. Correlations between serum bone turnover markers.
Correlations between serum bone turnover markers.
A) Serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) vs. serum osteoprotegerin (OPG), B) serum alkaline phosphatase (AP) vs. serum osteocalcin, C) serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase type 5b (TRAP5b) vs. serum osteocalcin, D) serum OPG vs. serum soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (sRANKL), E) serum OPG vs. serum sclerostin, and F) serum C-telopeptide of type-1 collagen (ICTP) vs. serum sclerostin. Data are presented as scatter plots.
Tab. 2. Correlations between serum parameters.
Correlations between serum parameters.

Discussion

PTH1R, OPG, and RANKL expression in different bone cell populations

In the present study, PTH1R, OPG, and RANKL expression was observed not only on osteoblasts but also on osteocytes, corroborating recent recognition of the key role of osteocytes in bone turnover [1214]. No PTH1R, OPG, or RANKL expression was detected on osteoclasts. While previous studies have been in agreement regarding the expression of PTH1R, OPG or RANKL on osteoblasts and osteocytes [5, 9, 12, 1528], literature data are contradictory regarding their expression on osteoclasts. Whereas in some studies PTH1R, OPG or RANKL expression was detected also on osteoclasts [15, 21, 23, 2931], in others this was not the case [9, 16, 17, 18, 22, 32, 33]. These discrepancies may be attributed not only to species or methodological differences but also to differences between normal and pathological conditions. For example, Carda et al. [23] detected OPG and RANKL expression on osteoclasts of the human embryonal craniomandibular joint when using immunohistochemistry, but not when using in-situ hybridization, and another study using in-situ hybridization revealed PTH1R expression only in actively resorbing osteoclasts under certain pathological conditions (e.g., hyperparathyroid bone, healing fracture callus, Pagetic bone), but not in normal human bone [19]. Additional studies are necessary for further clarification.

Correlations between bone metabolism markers and clinical data

Patient age

The present study revealed a negative association between patient age of the whole cohort of patients and bone trabecular mass, reflecting the well-known increased risk of osteoporosis with increasing age [3436]. This age-related decline in trabecular mass was paralleled by a decrease in bone OPG expression, whereas bone RANKL expression remained unchanged with age. These findings suggest that changes in OPG expression, leading to a secondary imbalance between OPG and RANKL expression, are predominantly responsible for bone loss in the ageing skeleton. This theory is corroborated by the observation that OPG-deficient mice develop early-onset osteoporosis [37]. Paradoxically, the age-dependent decline in bone trabecular mass and OPG expression was accompanied by an increase in serum PTH and OPG and a decrease in serum sRANKL. However, similar observations have been reported by numerous other authors (see e.g., [3846]) and it has been suggested that these findings represent a compensatory response to progressive bone loss in aged individuals [4749]. Besides in bone, OPG is produced by a variety of other organs and tissues including the cardiovascular system. Here, OPG has been associated with vascular calcification, artherosclerosis and cardiovascular mortality (which also increase with age) (see e.g., [5056]). Therefore, the serum OPG values may also reflect the cardiovascular status of the patients. In the present study also for sclerostin a significant increase with age was observed. This marker is secreted primarily by osteocytes, has a negative effect on bone deposition, and has already been linked to age-related impairment of bone formation [5759]. All other parameters assessed in the present study remained unchanged with increasing age. Of these, only TP1NP has been previously evaluated in this context and was also shown to be unaffected by age [59].

Patient sex

Compared with men, women exhibited less trabecular mass, lower serum sclerostin, and lower serum ICTP, but higher TRAP5b and a tendency towards higher osteocalcin. Except for serum sclerostin and ICTP, which have not been investigated in this context so far, these results correspond well to existing data in the literature [35, 36, 6062]. They are consistent with the well-known higher risk of osteoporosis and lower total bone turnover in elderly women, compared with men, but point also to a higher number and activity of osteoclasts in women, as indicated by the higher TRAP5b levels. Because of their greater bone loss and according to the majority of the previous studies [40, 6166], higher serum PTH and OPG levels would have been expected in female than in male patients. In the current study, PTH was similar in both sexes and OPG was somewhat higher in women than in men, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (mean OPG in women vs. men: 5.27 ± 1.99 vs. 4.77 ± 2.11; Mann-Whitney, p = 0.137).

Kidney function

In the present study, patients with impaired kidney function exhibited a shorter bone decalcification time (as an indirect measure for bone mineralization and bone density) and less bone trabecular mass, indicating the presence of renal osteopathy. Furthermore, in patients with kidney dysfunction lower sRANKL and higher serum PTH, OPG, and sclerostin were observed. These findings correspond well to the results of previous studies, which also observed lower bone mineral density [67], higher serum PTH [38, 46, 6770], higher serum OPG [61, 62, 67, 68, 71, 72], and lower sRANKL [61, 62] in patients with renal insufficiency. These changes in serum PTH, OPG and sRANKL are likely compensatory to bone loss, similar to the changes associated with increasing age. In accordance with the findings in older individuals, sclerostin seems to be involved also in the pathogenesis of bone loss in renal osteopathy.

Correlations between bone metabolism parameters

As expected, in the current study a positive correlation between bone decalcification time and trabecular mass was observed. There was also a positive association between OPG expression of the osteocytes of the samples A and the decalcification time of these samples as well as with the percentage of trabecular bone. These findings reflect the importance of osteocytes in bone metabolism, in addition to the protective role of OPG expression on bone mass. As expected, a negative correlation was observed between RANKL expression on both osteoblasts and osteocytes and bone decalcification time, as well as trabecular mass. However, there was also a positive relationship between PTH1R and OPG expression (mainly with osteocytes) and between PTH1R and RANKL expression (mainly with osteoblasts), reflecting the well-known dual role of PTH/PTH1R signalling in bone turnover (osteoanabolic or osteocatabolic, depending on the duration and periodicity of PTH action) [73].

Regarding serum parameters, positive correlations were noticed between serum PTH, OPG, and AP, all of which were upregulated with bone loss. These findings correspond well to data from the literature showing positive associations between PTH and AP [70, 74, 75] and between OPG and AP [47]. Additionally, and also consistent with previous results [74, 76, 77], a negative association was observed between serum OPG and sRANKL. This inverse relationship was expected since these parameters have opposing effects on bone turnover. Also as anticipated, in the current study positive correlations were observed between serum OPG and TP1NP, a marker for collagen production; between the two bone formation markers, AP and osteocalcin; and between the two bone resorption indicators, sclerostin and ICTP. Interestingly, there were also positive correlations between serum OPG and sclerostin; between serum AP and osteocalcin, both of which are secreted by osteoblasts; and between serum AP and TRAP5b, the latter of which is produced by osteoclasts. These findings indicate the presence of high bone turnover, which in many studies has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures [75, 7882]. Previous studies have likewise reported correlations between OPG and TP1NP [64], between AP and TRAP5b [74], and between osteocalcin and TRAP5b [74]. Moreover, data from the literature suggest that, independent of bone mineral density, bone turnover markers may be useful for predicting osteoporotic fractures, with bone resorption markers having higher prognostic value than bone formation indicators [75, 79, 81, 82]. The present study also revealed a positive correlation between bone OPG expression and serum TN1NP and a negative association between trabecular mass and serum TRAP5b, both of which were expected.

Interestingly, the present study did not show associations between bone PTH1R expression and serum PTH, between bone OPG expression and serum OPG, or between bone RANKL expression and serum sRANKL. Similar findings have been previously reported for bone PTH1R and serum PTH [21] and for bone RANKL and serum sRANKL [27]. Thus, serum OPG or sRANKL are not useful indicators of bone OPG or RANKL expression. There also seems to be no direct effect of PTH on PTH1R expression, which may be attributed to the modulatory influences of other key factors in bone metabolism, as suggested by the observed correlations between bone PTH1R expression and OPG, as well as RANKL, expression. The lack of correlation between sRANKL values and bone RANKL expression may be explained by the existence of other sources of sRANKL in addition to bone cells (e.g., activated T lymphocytes) [83]. This is supported by our findings of a negative correlation between PTH1R expression and serum sRANKL and a positive association between PTH1R and RANKL expression.

Conclusions

In the present study, a broad panel of tissue and serum parameters of bone metabolism was assessed in a large cohort of orthopaedic patients to evaluate possible relationships between these parameters and to correlate the results with clinical data. The study revealed a number of clear interrelationships between the tissue and serum bone metabolism markers investigated, which also increases the probability that the changes observed with these parameters are indeed related to bone metabolism. Additionally, the study identified characteristic changes in some of these parameters in dependence on age, sex, and kidney function, which makes them useful diagnostic or prognostic markers. Overall, these findings improve our understanding of bone metabolism under different physiological and pathological conditions, but further investigations with even larger groups of patients are necessary to validate the results.


Zdroje

1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Bone Health and Osteoporosis: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General. 2004.

2. Lupsa BC, Insogna K. Bone Health and osteoporosis. Endocinol Metab Clin N Am. 2015;44:517–530.

3. Pisani P, Renna MD, Conversano F, Casciaro E, Di Paola M, Quarta E, et al. Major osteoporotic fragility fractures: risk factor updates and social impact. World J Orthop. 2016;7:171–181. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i3.171 27004165

4. Khosla S. Minireview: the OPG/RANKL/RANK system. Endocrinol. 2001;142:5050–5055.

5. Ma YL, Cain RL, Halladay DL, Yang X, Zeng Q, Miles RR, et al. Catabolic effects of continuous human PTH (1–38) in vivo is associated with sustained stimulation of RANKL and inhibition of OPG and gene-associated bone formation. Endocrinology. 2001;142:4047–4054. doi: 10.1210/endo.142.9.8356 11517184

6. Kostenuik PJ, Shalhoub V. Osteoprotegerin: a physiological and pharmacological inhibitor of bone resorption. Curr Pharm Des. 2001;7:613–635. doi: 10.2174/1381612013397807 11375772

7. Huang JC, Sakata T, Pfleger LL, Bencsik M, Halloran BP, Bikle DD, et al. PTH differentially regulates expression of RANKL and OPG. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19:235–244. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.0301226 14969393

8. Kaemmerer D, Sänger J, Arsenic R, D’Haese JG, Neumann J, Schmitt-Graeff A, et al. Evaluation of somatostatin, CXCR4 chemokine and endothelin A receptor expression in a large set of paragangliomas. Oncotarget. 2017;8:89958–89969. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21194 29163802

9. Lupp A, Klenk C, Röcken C, Evert M, Mawrin C, Schulz S. Immunohistochemical identification of the PTHR1 in normal and neoplastic human tissues. Mol Endocrinol. 2010;162:979–986.

10. Bressot C, Meunier PJ, Chapuy MC, Lejeune E, Edouard C, Darby AJ. Histomorphometric profile, pathophysiology and reversibility of cortico-steroid-induced osteoporosis. Metab Bone Dis Rel Res. 1979;1:303–311.

11. Remmele W, Stegner HE. Recommendation for uniform definition of an immunoreactive score (IRS) for immunohistochemical estrogen receptor detection (ER-ICA) in breast cancer tissue. Pathologe. 1987;8:138–140. 3303008

12. Bellido T. Osteocyte-driven bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int. 2014;94:25–34. doi: 10.1007/s00223-013-9774-y 24002178

13. Goldring SR. The osteocyte: key player in regulating bone turnover. RMD Open. 2014;1:e000049.

14. Schaffler MB, Cheung WY, Majeska R, Kennedy O. Osteocytes: master orchestrators of bone. Calcif Tissue Int. 2014;94:5–24. doi: 10.1007/s00223-013-9790-y 24042263

15. Rao LG, Murray TM, Heersche J. Immunohistochemical demonstration of parathyroid hormone binding to specific cell types in fixed rat bone tissue. Endocrinology. 1983;113:805–810. doi: 10.1210/endo-113-2-805 6307656

16. Rouleau MF, Mitchell J, Goltzman D. In vivo distribution of parathyroid hormone receptors in bone: evidence that a predominant osseous target cell is not the mature osteoblast. Endocrinol. 1988;123:187–191.

17. Lee K, Deeds JD, Chiba S, Un-No M, Bond AT, Segre GV. Parathyroid hormone induces sequential c-fos expression in bone cells in vivo: in situ localisation of its receptor and c-fos messenger ribonucleic acids. Endocrinol. 1994;134:441–450.

18. Fermor B, Skerry TM. PTH/PTHrP receptor expression on osteoblasts and osteocytes but not resorbing bone surfaces in growing rats. J Bone Miner Res. 1995;10:1935–1943. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650101213 8619374

19. Picton ML, Moore PR, Mawer EB, Houghton D, Freemont AJ, Hutchinson AJ, et al. Down-regulation of human osteoblast PTH/PTHrP receptor mRNA in end-stage renal failure. Kidney Int. 2000;58:1440–1449. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00306.x 11012879

20. Ikeda T, Utsuyama M, Hirokawa K. Expression profiles of receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand, receptor activator of nuclear factor κB, and osteoprotegerin messenger RNA in aged and ovariectomized rat bones. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16:1416–1425. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.8.1416 11499864

21. Langub MC, Monier-Faugere MC, Qi Q, Geng Z, Koszewski NJ, Malluche HH. Parathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide type 1 receptor in human bone. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16:448–456. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.3.448 11277262

22. Silvestrini G, Ballanti P, Patacchioli F, Leopizzi M, Gualtieri N, Monnazzi P, et al. Detection of osteoprotegerin (OPG) and its ligand (RANKL) mRNA and protein in femur and tibia of the rat. J Mol Hist. 2004;36:59–67.

23. Carda C, Silvestrini G, Gomez de Ferraris ME, Peydró A, Bonucci E. Osteoprotegerin (OPG) and RANKL expression and distribution in developing human craniomandibular joint. Tissue & Cell. 2005;37:247–255.

24. O´Brien CA, Plotkin LI, Galli C, Goellner JJ, Gortazar AR, Allen MR, et al. Control of bone mass and remodeling by PTH receptor signaling in osteocytes. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002942 18698360

25. Rhee Y, Allen MR, Condon K, Lezcano V, Ronda AC, Galli C, et al. PTH receptor signaling in osteocytes governs periosteal bone formation and intracortical remodeling. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26:1035–1046. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.304 21140374

26. Powell WF Jr, Barry KJ, Tulum I, Kobayashi T, Harris SE, Bringhurst FR, et al. Targeted ablation of the PTH/PTHrP receptor in osteocytes impairs bone structure and homeostatic calcemic responses. J Endocrinol. 2011;209:21–32. doi: 10.1530/JOE-10-0308 21220409

27. Honma M, Ikebuchi Y, Kariya Y, Hayashi M, Hayashi N, Aoki S, et al. RANKL subcellular trafficking and regulatory mechanisms in osteocytes. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28:1936–1949. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1941 23529793

28. Saini V, Marengi DA, Barry KJ, Fulzele KS, Heiden E, Liu X, et al. Parathyroid hormone (PTH)/PTH-related peptide type 1 receptor (PPR) signaling in osteocytes regulates anabolic and catabolic skeletal responses to PTH. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:20122–20134. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.441360 23729679

29. Kartsogiannis V, Zhou H, Horwood NJ, Thomas RJ, Hards DK, Quinn JM, et al. Localization of RANKL (receptor activator of NF kappa B ligand) mRNA and protein in skeletal and extraskeletal tissues. Bone. 1999;25:525–534. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(99)00214-8 10574572

30. Oshiro T, Shibasaki Y, Martin TJ, Sasaki T. Immunolocalization of vacuolar-type H+-ATPase, cathepsin K, matrix metalloproteinase-9, and receptor activator of NFkappaB ligand in odontoclasts during physiological root resorption of human deciduous teeth. Anat Rec. 2001;264:305–311. doi: 10.1002/ar.1127 11596012

31. Dempster DW, Hughes-Begos CE, Plavetic-Chee K, Brandao-Burch A, Cosman F, Nieves J, et al. Normal human osteoclasts formed from peripheral blood monocytes express PTH type 1 receptors and are stimulated by PTH in the absence of osteoblasts. J Cell Biochem. 2005;95:139–148. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20388 15723294

32. Silve CM, Hradek GT, Jones AL, Arnaud CD. Parathyroid hormone receptor in intact embryonic chicken bone: characterization and cellular localization. J Cell Biol. 1982;94:379–386. doi: 10.1083/jcb.94.2.379 6286691

33. Nakamura H, Tsuji T, Hirata A, Yamamoto T. Localization of osteoprotegerin (OPG) on bone surfaces and cement lines in rat tibia. J Histochem Cytochem. 2002;50:945–953. doi: 10.1177/002215540205000708 12070273

34. Burkhardt R, Kettner G, Böhm W, Schmidmeier M, Schlag R, Frisch B, et al. Changes in trabecular bone, hematopoieses and bone marrow vessels in aplastic anemia, primary osteoporosis, and old age: a comparative histomorphometric study. Pergamon J. 1987;8:157–164.

35. Seeman E. Pathogenesis of bone fragility in women and men. Lancet. 2002;359:1841–1850. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08706-8 12044392

36. Seeman E. Invited Review: Pathogenesis of osteoporosis. J Appl Physiol. 2003;95:2142–2151. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00564.2003 14555675

37. Bucay N, Sarosi I, Dunstan CR, Morony S, Tarpley J, Capparelli C, et al. Osteoprotegerin-deficient mice develop early onset osteoporosis and arterial calcification. Genes Dev. 1998;12:1260–1268. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.9.1260 9573043

38. Carter JL O´Riordan SE, Eaglestone GL, Delaney MP, Lamb EJ. Bone mineral metabolism and its relationship to kidney disease in a residential care home population: a cross-sectional study. Nephro Dial Transplant. 2008;23:3554–3565.

39. Findlay D, Chehade M, Tsangari H, Neale S, Hay S, Hopwood B, et al. Circulating RANKL is inversely correlated to RANKL mRNA levels in bone in osteoarthritic males. Arth Res Ther. 2008;10:R2.

40. Samelson EJ, Broe KE, Demissie S, Beck TJ, Karasik D, Kathiresan S, et al. Increased plasma osteoprotegerin concentrations are associated with indices of bone strength of the hip. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:1789–1795. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-2492 18303076

41. Uemura H, Yasui T, Miyatani Y, Yamada M, Hiyoshi M, Arisawa K, et al. Circulating profiles of osteoprotegerin and soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand in post-menopausal women. J Endocrinol Invest. 2008;31:163–168. doi: 10.1007/bf03345584 18362509

42. Zhao HY, Liu JM, Ning G, Zhao YJ, Chen Y, Sun LH, et al. Relationships between insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and OPG, RANKL, bone mineral density in healthy Chinese women. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19:221–226. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0440-y 17703270

43. Nabipour I, Larijani B, Vahdat K, Assadi M, Jafari SM, Ahmadi E, et al. Relationships among serum receptor of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand, osteoprotegerin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: osteoimmunity versus osteoinflammatory. Menopause. 2009;16:950–955. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181a181b8 19387415

44. LaCroix AZ, Jackson RD, Aragaki A, Kooperberg C, Cauley JA, Chen Z, et al. OPG and sRANKL serum levels and incident hip fracture in postmenopausal Caucasian women in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. Bone. 2013;56: doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.05.018 23735608

45. Piatek S, Adolf D, Wex T, Halangk W, Klose S, Westphal S, et al. Multiparameter analysis of serum levels of C-telopeptide crosslaps, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, cathepsin K, osteoprotegerin and receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Maturitas. 2013;74:363–368. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.01.005 23391500

46. Di Monaco M, Castiglioni C, Vallero F, Di Monaco R, Tappero R. Parathyroid-hormone variance is only marginally explained by a panel of determinants: a cross-sectional study of 909 hip-fracture patients. J Bone Miner Metab. 2014;32:573–579. doi: 10.1007/s00774-013-0532-z 24202062

47. Yano K, Tsuda E, Washida N, Kobayashi F, Goto M, Harada A, et al. Immunological characterization of circulating osteoprotegerin/osteoclastogenesis inhibitory factor: increased serum concentrations in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14:518–527. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.4.518 10234572

48. Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Dobnig H, Piswanger-Soelkner C, Bonelli C, Dimai HP, Leb G, et al. Osteoprotegerin serum levels in women: correlation with age, bone mass, bone turnover and fracture status. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2003;115:291–297. doi: 10.1007/bf03040334 12793029

49. Liu JM, Zhao HY, Ning G, Zhao YJ, Chen Y, Zhang ZH, et al. Relationships between the changes of serum levels of OPG and RANKL with age, menopause, bone biochemical markers and bone mineral density in Chinese women aged 20–75. Calcif Tissue Int. 2005;76:1–6. doi: 10.1007/s00223-004-0007-2 15455183

50. Collin-Osdoby P. Regulation of vascular calcification by osteoclast regulatory factors RANKL and osteoprotegerin. Circ Res. 2004;95:1046–1057. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000149165.99974.12 15564564

51. Kiechl S, Schett G, Wenning G, Redlich K, Oberhollenzer M, Mayr A, et al. Osteoprotegerin is a risk factor for progressive atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2004;109:2175–2180. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000127957.43874.BB 15117849

52. Van Campenhout A, Golledge J. Osteoprotegerin, vascular calcification and atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2009;204:321–329. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.09.033 19007931

53. Venuraju SM, Yerramasu A, Corder R, Lahiri A. Osteoprotegerin as a predictor of coronary artery disease and cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2049–2061. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.013 20447527

54. Augoulea A, Vrachnis N, Lambrinoudaki I, Dafopoulos K, Iliodromiti Z, Daniilidis A, et al. Osteoprotegerin as a marker of atherosclerosis in diabetic patients. Int J Endocrinol. 2013:182060. doi: 10.1155/2013/182060 23401681

55. Tschiederer L, Willeit J, Schett G, Kiechl S, Willeit P. Osteoprotegerin concentration and risk of cardiovascular outcomes in nine general population studies: Literature-based meta-analysis involving 26,442 participants. PLOS ONE. 2017;https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183910

56. Rochette L, Meloux A, Rigal E, Zeller M, Cottin Y, Vergely C. The role of osteoprotegerin and its ligands in vascular function. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:705. doi: 10.3390/ijms20030705 30736365

57. Ardawi MS, Al-Kadi HA, Rouzi AA, Qari MH. Determinants of serum sclerostin in healthy pre- and postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26: 2812–2822. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.479 21812027

58. Mödder UI, Hoey KA, Amin S, McCready LK, Achenbach SJ, Riggs BL et al. Relation of age, gender, and bone mass to circulating sclerostin levels in women and men. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26:373–279. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.217 20721932

59. Roforth MM, Fujita K, McGregor UI, Kirmany S, McCready LK, Peterson JM, et al. Effects of age on bone mRNA levels of sclerostin and other genes relevant to bone metabolism in humans. Bone. 2013;59:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.10.019 24184314

60. Schett G, Kiechl S, Redlich K, Oberhollenzer F, Weger S, Egger G, et al. Soluble RANKL and risk of nontraumatic fracture. JAMA. 2004;291:1108–1113. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.9.1108 14996780

61. Doumouchtsis KK, Kostakis AI, Doumouchtsis SK, Tziamalis MP, Tsigris C, Kostaki MA, et al. sRANKL/osteoprotegerin complex and biochemical markers in a cohort of male and female hemodialysis patients. J Endocrinol Invest. 2007;30:762. doi: 10.1007/BF03350814 17993768

62. Naumnik B, Klejna K, Koc-Zorawska E, Mysliwiec M. Age and gender predict OPG level and OPG/sRANKL ratio in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Adv Mol Sci. 2013;58:382–387.

63. Arrighi HM, Hsieh A, Wong H. Osteoprotegerin levels in healthy volunteers. Bone. 1998;23 (Suppl 1):T411.

64. Khosla S, Arrighi HM, Melton LJ, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM, Dunstan C, et al. Correlates of osteoprotegerin levels in women and men. Osteoporos Int. 2002;13:394–399. doi: 10.1007/s001980200045 12086350

65. Bernstein CN, Sargent M, Leslie WD. Serum osteoprotegerin is increased in Crohn’s disease: a population-based case control study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005;11:325–330. doi: 10.1097/01.mib.0000164015.60795.ca 15803021

66. Jørgensen L, Vik A, Emaus N, Brox J, Hansen JB, Mathiesen E, et al. Bone loss in relation to serum levels of osteoprotegerin and nuclear factor-κB ligand: The Tromsø Study. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21:931–938. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-1035-6 19701599

67. Shaarawy M, Fathy SA, Mehany NL, Hindy OW. Circulating levels of osteoprotegerin and receptor actvator of NF-κB ligand in patients with chronic renal failure. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45:1498–1503. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2007.306 17970704

68. Osorio A, Ortega E, Torres JM, Sanchez P, Ruiz-Requena E. Mineral-bone metabolism markers in young hemodialysis patients. Clin Biochem. 2011;44:1425–1428. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.08.1143 21933667

69. Patel S, Barron JL, Mirzazedeh M, Gallagher H, Hyer S, Cantor T, et al. Changes in bone mineral parameters, vitamin D metabolites, and PTH measurements with varying chronic kidney disease stages. J Bone Miner Metab. 2011;29:71–79. doi: 10.1007/s00774-010-0192-1 20521154

70. Vikrant S, Parashar A. Prevalence and severity of disordered mineral metabolism in patients with chronic kidney disease: a study from a tertiary care hospital in India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2016;20:460–467. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.183457 27366711

71. Coen G, Ballanti P, Balducci A, Calabria S, Fischer MS, Jankovic L, et al. Serum osteoprotegerin and renal osteodystrophy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17:233–238. doi: 10.1093/ndt/17.2.233 11812872

72. Mansour A, Aboeerad M, Qorbani M, Taheri APH, Pajouhi M, Keshtkar AA, et al. Association between low bone mass and the serum RANKL and OPG in patients with nephrolithiasis. BMC Nephrology. 2018;19:172. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-0960-z 29996796

73. Silva BC, Bilezikian JP. Parathyroid hormone: anabolic and catabolic actions on the skeleton. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2015;22:41–50. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2015.03.005 25854704

74. Mezquita-Raya P, de la Higuera M, García DF, Alonso G, Ruiz-Requena ME, de Dios Luna J, et al. The contribution of serum osteoprotegerin to bone mass and vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women. Osteopros Int. 2005;16:1368–1374.

75. Garnero P, Sornay-Rendu E, Claustrat B, Delmas PD. Biochemical markers of bone turnover, endogenous hormones and the risk of fractures in postmenopausal women: the OFELY study. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15:1526–1536. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.8.1526 10934651

76. Szalay F, Hegedus D, Lakatos PL, Tornai I, Bajnok E, Dunkel K, et al. High serum osteoprotegerin and low RANKL in primary biliary cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2003;38:395–400. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(02)00435-x 12663228

77. Kim JG, Kim JH, Lee DO, Kim H, Kim JY, Suh CS, et al. Changes in serum levels of osteoprotegerin and soluble receptor activator for nuclear factor kappaB ligand after estrogen-progestogen therapy and their relationships with changes in bone mass in postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2008;15:357–362. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e318133a153 17925661

78. Bauer DC, Garnero P, Harrison SL, Cauley JA, Eastell R, Ensrud KE, et al. Biochemical markers of bone turnover, hip bone loss, and fracture in older men: the MrOS study. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24:2032–2038. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.090526 19453262

79. Rosen CJ, Chesnut CH III and Mallinak NJ. The predictive value of biochemical markers of bone turnover for bone mineral density in early postmenopausal women treated with hormone replacement or calcium supplementation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82:1904–1910. doi: 10.1210/jcem.82.6.4004 9177404

80. Sornay-Rendu E, Munoz F, Garnero P, Duboeuf F, Delmas PD. Identification of osteopenic women at high risk of fracture: the OFELY study. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:1813–1819. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050609 16160738

81. Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Oka H, Kawaguchi H, Nakamura K, Akune KT. Biochemical markers of bone turnover as predictors of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures in men and women: 10-year follow-up of the Taiji cohort. Mod Rheumatol. 2011;21:608–620. doi: 10.1007/s10165-011-0455-2 21512822

82. Johansson H, Odén A, Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Morris HA, Cooper C, et al. A meta-analysis of reference markers of bone turnover for prediction of fracture. Calcif Tissue Int. 2014;94:560–567. doi: 10.1007/s00223-014-9842-y 24590144

83. Findlay DM, Atkins GJ. Relationship between serum RANKL and RANKL in bone. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22:2597–2602. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1740-9 21850548


Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 12
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
nový kurz
Autori: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#