#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Evaluating the effectiveness of HOCl application on odor reduction and earthworm population growth during vermicomposting of food waste employing Eisenia fetida


Authors: Chanwoo Kim aff001;  Younggu Her aff002;  Yooan Kim aff001;  Chanhoon Jung aff003;  Hangkyo Lim aff004;  Kyo Suh aff001
Authors place of work: Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University, Pyeonchang-gun, Gangwon, Republic of Korea aff001;  Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Tropical Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Homestead, Florida, United States of America aff002;  Interdisciplinary Program in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea aff003;  Department of Biology, Notre Dame of Maryland University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America aff004;  Institute of Green Bio Science & Technology, Seoul National University, Gangwon, Republic of Korea aff005
Published in the journal: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Category: Research Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226229

Summary

Vermicomposting has been recommended as an eco-friendly method to transform organic waste into nutrient resources with minimum energy input. However, odor and pest issues associated with this method limit the use of vermicomposting, especially in indoor conditions. This study evaluated the effectiveness of applying hypochlorous acid (HOCl) to deodorize the vermicomposting process and improve the breeding environment for earthworms (Eisenia fetida). The deodorization performance of HOCl was compared by measuring the amount of ammonia (NH3) and amine (R-NH2) released from the decaying process of two types of food waste: HOCl-treated (HTW) waste and non-treated waste (NTW). The total and individual weights of earthworms in the waste treated with HOCl was measured to evaluate the impact on earthworm reproduction after applying HOCl. The results showed that HOCl application could reduce NH3 by 40% and R-NH2 by 80%, and increase the earthworm population size and total weight by up to 29% and 92%, respectively, compared to the control group. These results suggest that HOCl application is potentially an efficient method to control the odor and to boost earthworm reproduction and thus facilitate vermicomposting for improved food waste treatment and environmental quality.

Keywords:

Population size – Population growth – Gut bacteria – Amines – Ammonia – Organic materials – Earthworms – Gases

Introduction

Sustainable methods for processing food waste have received considerable attention as global food waste has rapidly increased over the past few decades [1]. In South Korea, food waste per capita has increased by more than 14.3% in the last 10 years [2, 3]. Thus, eco-friendly food waste treatment is critical for improved environmental quality. However, only a few countries process food waste separately from other types of waste. In many countries, food waste is disposed of with other landfill waste and/or incinerated through dehydration and combustion using supplementary fuel. However, incineration is relatively expensive and generates harmful gases [4]. Thus, decomposing food waste in landfills is still the preferred solution, even though organic materials and leachate from landfill food waste can contaminate the soil and water and cause environmental problems.

Graff (1974) [5] demonstrated that vermicomposting to process food waste using earthworms is a potentially effective and efficient method to treat food waste. Vermicomposting is recognized as an eco-friendly process because it does not require direct energy input [6]. Several studies have investigated the potential of vermicomposting to process not only food waste but also sludge and livestock manure [1, 710]. In addition to breaking down waste, research has demonstrated that vermicomposting could promote plant nutrient uptake and soil microbial activity, and improve soil texture and quality [1115]. Earthworm activity in the soil could improve soil aggregation and structure, and vermicompost application could improve microbial diversity and populations [1619]. However, this method has been limited because of the long processing time, space demands, and potential odor and pest issues, especially in indoor conditions. The vermicomposting process requires an extended time to grow the earthworms and requires adequate space to handle the mass of food waste. In addition, the odor and pests created in the process can be a challenge for small-scale, indoor, food waste treatment facilities [20].

Although several vermicomposting studies have focused on the efficiency of growing worms and processing organic waste [6, 2123], few studies have focused on the odor problem associated with vermicomposting. Mao and Tsai (2006)’s study was one of the first to examine how to efficiently eliminate or control the odor from food waste composting using multiple engineering methods [24]. Edwards and Arancon (2010) later demonstrated how odor from vermicomposting could be controlled using a breeding box [20]. However, the applicability of their method is limited. Whereas a sealed lid can control the odor from breeding bins, opening the lid for moisture control and feed supply diffuses the odor. To date, follow-up studies have not been conducted to improve the efficiency and applicability of their breeding box experiment to reduce odor.

Another method is the application of hypochlorous acid (HOCl), which is a weak acid known to have antimicrobial effects [25, 26]. Many studies have confirmed the sterilizing function of HOCl and demonstrated its effectiveness in alleviating odor [25, 2730]. At the same concentration, HOCl has an 80 times greater antibacterial effect than that of hypochlorite ion (ClO-) [31]. Cai (2016) also demonstrated that HOCl has an antiviral mechanism and thus can be used to regulate viral infections [32]. In 1998, in the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved HOCI for its safety as a high-level disinfectant [33], and in 2000, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved it as a harmless preservative for a saline solution [34]. These studies and administrative actions have demonstrated the potential of HOCl as an agent for odor and pest control in vermicomposting.

Majlessi et al. (2012) showed that vermicomposting of food waste using earthworms could stabilize the vermicomposting process for plant growth by comparing a seed germination index, C/N ratio, and other stability and maturity indices [35]. Moreover, certain additives to the vermicomposting may promote the vermicomposting efficiency through fast growth of earthworms and thus overcome some of the obstacles of vermicomposting. Zarrabi et al. (2018) also found that vermicomposting using zeolite positively influenced the growth pattern of earthworms to improve the quality of vermicomposting [36]. Previous studies, however, have mainly focused on the sterilizing function and effectiveness of odor control of HOCl. No known studies have investigated the effect of HOCl on both the vermicomposting process and earthworm growth.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implications of HOCl application on the food waste vermicomposting process to eliminate the odor and increase earthworm growth. This study tested three vermicomposting conditions with different HOCl applications for moisture control and feed preparation. The test started with three groups with the same earthworm weight and population size. Changes in the three groups were measured after the experimental period (60 days). Odor reduction was quantified by measuring the concentrations of ammonia and amine emitted from the food waste throughout the composting process. The results were statistically analyzed and compared with those of other relevant studies.

Materials and methods

Two independent experiments were designed and conducted to quantify and isolate the effects of HOCl application on earthworm population growth and odor suppression (Fig 1).

Fig. 1. Overall procedure of two independent experiments implemented in this study.
Overall procedure of two independent experiments implemented in this study.

Earthworm and food waste

Earthworms, Eisenia fetida (Family Lumbricidae), used in this study can adapt to decaying organic materials and grow well in indoor and laboratory conditions [20, 37]. This species is widely used for vermicomposting of various industrial organic wastes because of their ability to convert organic matter into biomass, which has a high market value [20]. Earthworms for this study were bought from Sekyoung Farm, which is a retailer of earthworms in South Korea.

The earthworm feed consisted of fruit including bananas, apples, watermelons, and melons as well as food waste from a cafeteria in Seoul National University, which was collected each week over the 60-day period. Since salinity in food waste can limit the growth of earthworms, the collected food waste from the cafeteria was fermented for three days to reduce the salinity [38].

HOCl application in feed preparation

Earthworms could easily adapt because the fermentation process also decayed the food waste. In the earthworm population growth test, 500 mL of HOCl was mixed into the food waste for feed preparation in group 2 before feeding it to the earthworms. In group 3, HOCl was used for both moisture control and feed preparation. As the mass density of food waste widely varies depending on the type of waste, this study determined the amount of HOCl to be applied considering the volume and weight of food waste to be treated. For moisture control, additional HOCl was directly sprayed onto the bedding surface to maintain the proper soil humidity inside the bin: between 50% and 70%.

The HOCl concentration and acidity were in the range of 40 to 50 ppm and pH 5.5 to 6.0, respectively. These amounts met the criteria of slightly acidic electrolyzed water (SAEW), a concentration of 10 to 80 ppm, and acidity pH of 5.0 to 6.5 [39, 40].

Earthworm population growth test

The earthworms were bred separately in six Styrofoam bins with an internal size of L 36 × D 26 × H 28 cm (Fig 2A). Two bins were assigned to each group. Each bin had seven breathing holes with a 1-cm diameter which were located 20 cm above the bottom of each two walls and 45 drainage holes with a 1-cm diameter on the bottom. Each bin was filled with earthworms and 1,250 g compost from the earthworm retailer, which created an 18-cm deep compost layer to provide bedding for the worms (Fig 2B).

Fig. 2.
Design of breeding bins with a bedding and feeding plan for 60 days of vermicomposting: (a) represents the design of the earthworm breeding bins. (b) displays the depth of the bedding and the location of feeding (food wastes).

To test the effectiveness of the HOCl application, HOCl was applied to the soil for feed preparation and moisture control. This study applied 500 mL of HOCl or sterilized tap water corresponding to the weight of food waste (of 200 g). Sterilized tap water (500 mL) on the water supply was used for moisture control for groups 1 and 2. Group 1 was the control group without any HOCl application with only sterilized tap water (500 mL) for moisture control. For group 2, HOCl (500 mL) was applied to the food waste for feed preparation before feeding it to the earthworms and sterilized tap water (500 mL) was used for moisture control. For group 3, only HOCl was used for both moisture control and feed preparation. In other words, in group 3 bins, all the conditions for feed preparation with HOCl were the same as for group 2, but an additional 500 mL of HOCl was sprayed onto the bedding in the bins during the experimental period for moisture control.

Twenty earthworms were placed in each bin for the three groups; each earthworm weighed 0.5 g, on average, with a standard deviation of 0.2 g. The weight of each earthworm was measured according to the “dump and hand sort technique” method proposed by Appelhof and Olszewski (2017) [41]. Food waste was added to each experimental bin in the designated location after preparing the feed using HOCl every week for 60 days (Fig 2B). The 60-day experimental period was predetermined following the active reproduction duration provided from Warman and AngLopez [6].

Odor suppression test

Ammonia (NH3) and amine (R-NH2) gases are the major components and causes of the bad smell generated in the vermicomposting process. Food waste samples were treated by applying 15 mL of HOCl, denoted as HOCl-treated food waste (HTW). HTW and non-treated food waste (NTW) of 15 mL were prepared and fermented in 10 L sealed containers for 30 days at room temperatures between 24°C and 26°C and relative humidity levels between 38% and 49%.

The concentrations of NH3 and R-NH2 in the containers were measured to quantify the level of odor created from the composting process using a gas detection tube, Gastec GV-50ps. This study replicated the concentrations two times. The gas detection tube consists of a gas sampling pump and a gas detector tube, and gas concentrations can be scaled by reading the color change layer that responds to the concentrations. Details of the gas detection tube method can be found in Thompson and Lotter’s (2014) study [42].

To verify the odor suppression effect of HOCl, the acid was sprayed onto the HTW and NTW samples after measuring the gas concentration. The concentrations of NH3 and R-NH2 were measured again after 30 minutes. Then, the treatments, fermentation, and HOCl application were compared. In the odor suppression test, an earthworm was not introduced to isolate the effects of HOCl application on odor (Fig 3).

Fig. 3. The experimental process to evaluate the deodorization effects of HOCl.
The experimental process to evaluate the deodorization effects of HOCl.
Ammonia (NH3) and amine (R-NH2) gases are major components and sources of odor: food waste (FW), non-treated food waste (NTW), and HOCl-treated food waste (HTW).

Analytical methods and statistical analysis

The population size and individual weights of earthworms among the three groups were observed at the beginning and the end of experiment of earthworm growth test. They were compared using a non-parametric test (Kruskal-Wallis test) since the variables are non-normal. The Mann-Whitney test was also used for the post-hoc pair wise comparison when a significant difference was found among the groups.

Results and discussion

Test of the effectiveness for earthworm population growth

Table 1 summarizes the effectiveness of the HOCl application on the earthworm population and weight. The results of this experiment showed that the number of earthworms and total weight of the earthworms increased in all the breeding bins over the 60 days. Compared to the control (group 1), the HOCl application groups (group 2 and group 3) showed higher growth rates in both population and total weight. Group 3 with HOCl applications for moisture control and feed preparation turned out to be the most effective for earthworm reproduction and growth.

Tab. 1. Summary of the effectiveness of HOCI application by group within the vermicomposting period (60 days).
Summary of the effectiveness of HOCI application by group within the vermicomposting period (60 days).

This study also compared the difference in the growth (population and individual weight) of earthworms among the three groups (N = 3) (see Table 2). Group 3 increased the population in the two breeding bins by 64% and 25%, respectively. The earthworm population after 60 days of breeding in group 3 was 57% to 72% greater than the population in group 1, and 24% to 35% greater than that in group 2.

Tab. 2. Results of the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test conducted to confirm the effectiveness of the HOCl applications (a significance level (α) of 0.05).
Results of the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test conducted to confirm the effectiveness of the HOCl applications (a significance level (α) of 0.05).

The total weight of the earthworms also increased during the experimental period. Similar to the increased population, the total weight of the two bins in group 3 increased by 233% and 289%, respectively (Table 1). However, the average weight of individual earthworms decreased over the experiment period at the similar rate in all three groups. These changes in population size and individual weight were evidently attributed to the number of newly hatched juveniles, and its effect was greater in the HOCl treated croups, in particular group 3. HOCl application is proposed to be a key contributor to the population growth by providing favorable conditions for reproduction.

Our finding indicates that HOCl application improved the general living conditions for the worms both directly and indirectly. HOCl is known to suppress the growth and development of some common pathogenic microbes in soil via enzymatic activities [4346]. Additionally, vermicomposting worm species could maintain healthy microbial diversity in the soil by either consuming the soil microorganisms or nurturing a selective group of microbiota internally and externally [47]. The chloramination effect of HOCl might facilitate this direct effect of the earthworm on controlling the soil microorganisms by suppressing the harmful activity of common pathogenic bacteria in soil, as evidenced by the reduced production of nitrogen-metabolite gases.

The worm species, Eisenia fetida, is also known to inherit at least one gut bacteria species from its parents via egg capsules [48], and the gut bacteria are crucial factors in the vermicomposting process. Thus, it is plausible to propose that the gut-microbial composition and their composting activity was not significantly affected by the microbicidal effects of HOCl in the compost substrate. In the meantime, even though HOCl might not directly add any new nutrients that contribute to the population growth of the worms, it was possible that the antimicrobial effect indirectly supported the vermicomposting process and the worm reproduction, at least during this experiment period (one generational length of the worm species). In the present study, however, the change in the soil microbial diversity or gut bacterial composition under the HOCl treatments was not a direct interest; therefore, further studies on this subject and the long-term effects are warranted.

Warman and AngLopez [6] observed that the weight and population of the earthworms in their study increased by 150% and 60%, respectively, when the earthworms were allowed to grow without any treatment for 90 days. Their growth rates were similar to the control in our study. However, the growth rate of groups 2 and 3 in this study outperformed their non-treatment experiment group in terms of earthworm weight and population, which confirms the meaningful effectiveness of HOCl applications for earthworm growth.

Test of effectiveness for odor suppression

The performance of HOCl for odor reduction is presented in Tables 3 and 4. The average concentrations of NH3 and R-NH2 in decayed food waste, as measured from the HTW treatment, were 15 ppm and 6 ppm, respectively. The average concentrations of NH3 and R-NH2 in NTW were 85 ppm and 10 ppm, respectively. The reduction effects of HTW were 82.3% and 40% compared to NTW.

Tab. 3. Effects (means ± S.E.) of HOCl pretreatment on the odor concentrations of food waste after decaying for 30 days (1st odor measurement): NTWs and HTWs indicate non-treated food waste and HOCl treated food waste, respectively.
Effects (means ± S.E.) of HOCl pretreatment on the odor concentrations of food waste after decaying for 30 days (1st odor measurement): NTWs and HTWs indicate non-treated food waste and HOCl treated food waste, respectively.
Tab. 4. Effects (means ± S.E.) of continuous HOCl application on the odor concentrations of decayed food waste (2nd odor measurement after 30 minutes): NTWs and HTWs indicate non-treated food waste and HOCl treated food waste, respectively.
Effects (means ± S.E.) of continuous HOCl application on the odor concentrations of decayed food waste (2<sup>nd</sup> odor measurement after 30 minutes): NTWs and HTWs indicate non-treated food waste and HOCl treated food waste, respectively.

Rayson et al. (2010) [49] and Tarade and Vrcek (2013) [50] showed that HOCl reacts with NH3 and R-NH2 and produces a chloramine substance, which is an effective disinfectant, depending on the ratio of chlorine to NH3 and R-NH2. The effective sterilization of HOCl could reduce the decay rate of food by disturbing the micro-organisms [51]. These results demonstrate that HOCl could suppress odor since HOCl changes the number of spoilage micro-organisms in the food waste and modifies the odor-causing substances [52].

The continuous application of HOCl reduced the odor of decayed food waste (Table 4). In particular, the results showed that HOCl was more effective with NH3 than R-NH2 (Table 4). Such result is attributed to the fact that the chlorine produced by the reaction with HOCl has the greater chloramination effect on NH3 than on R-NH2 [53]. The difference in the ammonia removal effect was also investigated because of the concentration difference in the NH3 gas presented at the beginning.

Conclusion

This study investigated how HOCl applications can influence earthworm population growth and odor in small-scale indoor vermicomposting. The breeding bin tests showed that the application of HOCl on food waste for feed could promote earthworm reproduction and could reduce the odor represented by the ammonia (NH3) and amine (R-NH2) gas concentrations in the waste. Increased earthworm reproduction after HOCl application enhanced vermicomposting process. Moreover, chloramine created by the reaction between HOCl and the two odor gases was effective in removing NH3 than R-NH2. This study experimentally demonstrated that the HOCl application can improve the living condition for the earthworm and alleviate odor from food waste. The findings of this study are expected to help improve the efficiency and applicability of vermicomposting, especially in small-scale indoor conditions.


Zdroje

1. Lim PN, Wu TY, Shyang Sim EY, Lim SL. The potential reuse of soybean husk as feedstock of Eudrilus eugeniae in vermicomposting. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2011;91(14):2637–42. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4504 21725978

2. ME. 2006 Status of Waste Generation and Disposal in Korea. Ministry of Environment (ME); 2007.

3. 2016 Status of Waste Generation and Disposal in Korea [Internet]. Ministry of Environment (ME). 2017.

4. Gebreegziabher T, Oyedun A, Lam K-L, Lee H, Hui C-W. Optimization of MSW Feed for Waste to Energy Practices. Chemical Engineering Transactions. 2012;29:679–84.

5. Graff O. Gewinnung von biomasse aus abfallstoffen durch kultur des kompostregenwurms Eisenia foetida (Savigny 1826). Landbauforschung Völkenrode. 1974;2:137–42.

6. Warman P, AngLopez M. Vermicompost derived from different feedstocks as a plant growth medium. Bioresource Technology. 2010;101(12):4479–83. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.098 20153632

7. Fornes F, Mendoza-Hernández D, García-de-la-Fuente R, Abad M, Belda RM. Composting versus vermicomposting: a comparative study of organic matter evolution through straight and combined processes. Bioresource technology. 2012;118:296–305. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.028 22705537

8. Fernández-Gómez M, Díaz-Raviña M, Romero E, Nogales R. Recycling of environmentally problematic plant wastes generated from greenhouse tomato crops through vermicomposting. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2013;10(4):697–708.

9. Shak KPY, Wu TY, Lim SL, Lee CA. Sustainable reuse of rice residues as feedstocks in vermicomposting for organic fertilizer production. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2014;21(2):1349–59. doi: 10.1007/s11356-013-1995-0 23900949

10. Gómez-Brandón M, Lores M, Domínguez J. Species-specific effects of epigeic earthworms on microbial community structure during first stages of decomposition of organic matter. PloS one. 2012;7(2):e31895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031895 22363763

11. Pathak A, Singh M, Kumar V. Composting of municipal solid waste: a sustainable waste management technique in Indian cities–A review. International Journal of Current Research. 2011;3(12):339–46.

12. Singh RP, Singh P, Araujo AS, Ibrahim MH, Sulaiman O. Management of urban solid waste: Vermicomposting a sustainable option. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2011;55(7):719–29.

13. Wu TY, Lim SL, Lim PN, Shak KPY, editors. Biotransformation of biodegradable solid wastes into organic fertilizers using composting or/and vermicomposting. 17th Conference on Process Integration, Modelling and Optimisation for Energy Saving and Pollution Reduction PRES; 2014.

14. Swati A, Hait S. A comprehensive review of the fate of pathogens during vermicomposting of organic wastes. Journal of environmental quality. 2018;47(1):16–29. doi: 10.2134/jeq2017.07.0265 29415111

15. Cai L, Gong X, Sun X, Li S, Yu X. Comparison of chemical and microbiological changes during the aerobic composting and vermicomposting of green waste. PloS one. 2018;13(11):e0207494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207494 30475832

16. Mainoo N-OK, Whalen JK, Barrington S. Earthworm abundance related to soil physicochemical and microbial properties in Accra, Ghana. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2008;3(3):186–94.

17. Ret Michael F. Allen TAZ. The effects of organic amendments on the restoration of a disturbed coastal sage scrub habitat. Restoration Ecology. 1998;6(1):52–8.

18. Azarmi R, Giglou MT, Taleshmikail RD. Influence of vermicompost on soil chemical and physical properties in tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) field. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2008;7(14).

19. Pathma J, Sakthivel N. Microbial diversity of vermicompost bacteria that exhibit useful agricultural traits and waste management potential. SpringerPlus. 2012;1(1):26.

20. Edwards CA, Arancon NQ, Sherman RL. Vermiculture technology: earthworms, organic wastes, and environmental management: CRC press; 2010.

21. Garg P, Gupta A, Satya S. Vermicomposting of different types of waste using Eisenia foetida: A comparative study. Bioresource technology. 2006;97(3):391–5. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.03.009 16168639

22. Liesch AM, Weyers SL, Gaskin JW, Das K. Impact of two different biochars on earthworm growth and survival. Annals of Environmental Science. 2010;4(1):1–9.

23. Mohee R, Soobhany N. Comparison of heavy metals content in compost against vermicompost of organic solid waste: past and present. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2014;92:206–13.

24. Mao I-F, Tsai C-J, Shen S-H, Lin T-F, Chen W-K, Chen M-L. Critical components of odors in evaluating the performance of food waste composting plants. Science of the total environment. 2006;370(2–3):323–9. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.06.016 16863658

25. Goto K, Kuwayama E, Nozu R, Ueno M, Hayashimoto N. Effect of hypochlorous acid solution on the eradication and prevention of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, serum biochemical variables, and cecum microbiota in rats. Experimental animals. 2015:14–0068.

26. Wu S-H, Lin J-F, Jiang R-S. Antibacterial Effect of Hypochlorous Acid Solution on Nasal Discharge from Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis. International journal of otolaryngology. 2018;2018.

27. Wang L, Bassiri M, Najafi R, Najafi K, Yang J, Khosrovi B, et al. Hypochlorous acid as a potential wound care agent: part I. Stabilized hypochlorous acid: a component of the inorganic armamentarium of innate immunity. Journal of burns and wounds. 2007;6.

28. Hakim H, Thammakarn C, Suguro A, Ishida Y, Kawamura A, Tamura M, et al. Evaluation of sprayed hypochlorous acid solutions for their virucidal activity against avian influenza virus through in vitro experiments. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. 2014:14–0413.

29. Jafry AT, Lee C, Kim D, Han G, Sung W-K, Lee J. Development of high concentrated slightly acidic hypochlorous acid generator for food safety. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. 2017;31(9):4541–7.

30. Kim Y-R, Nam S-H. Comparison of the preventive effects of slightly acidic HOCl mouthwash and CHX mouthwash for oral diseases. Biomedical Research. 2018;29(8):1718–23.

31. Hao X, Shen Z, Wang J, Zhang Q, Li B, Wang C, et al. In vitro inactivation of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and pseudorabies virus by slightly acidic electrolyzed water. The Veterinary Journal. 2013;197(2):297–301. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.02.007 23489846

32. Cai B. Role of hypochlorous acid (HOCl) in sodium chloride-induced inhibition of virus replication. 2016.

33. 40 CFR 180.1054 –Calcium hypochlorite; exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance, (2018).

34. 21 CFR 173.315 –Chemicals used in washing or to assist in the peeling of fruits and vegetables, (2018).

35. Majlessi M, Eslami A, Saleh HN, Mirshafieean S, Babaii S. Vermicomposting of food waste: assessing the stability and maturity. Iranian journal of environmental health science & engineering. 2012;9(1):25.

36. Zarrabi M, Mohammadi AA, Al-Musawi TJ, Saleh HN. Using natural clinoptilolite zeolite as an amendment in vermicomposting of food waste. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018;25(23):23045–54. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2360-0 29860684

37. Ali U, Sajid N, Khalid A, Riaz L, Rabbani MM, Syed JH, et al. A review on vermicomposting of organic wastes. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy. 2015;34(4):1050–62.

38. GF. Feasibility of a Vermicomposting Operation for Food Waste at the Clearfield County Prison. Gannett Fleming (GF)2002.

39. Bari M, Sabina Y, Isobe S, Uemura T, Isshiki K. Effectiveness of electrolyzed acidic water in killing Escherichia coli O157: H7, Salmonella Enteritidis, and Listeria monocytogenes on the surfaces of tomatoes. Journal of food protection. 2003;66(4):542–8. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-66.4.542 12696675

40. Sheng X, Shu D, Tang X, Zang Y. Effects of slightly acidic electrolyzed water on the microbial quality and shelf life extension of beef during refrigeration. Food Science & Nutrition. 2018;6(7):1975–81.

41. Appelhof M, Olszewski J. Worms Eat My Garbage: How to Set Up and Maintain a Worm Composting System: Compost Food Waste, Produce Fertilizer for Houseplants and Garden, and Educate Your Kids and Family: Storey Publishing; 2017.

42. Thompson S, Lotter C. Conservation of matter in the life sciences. Science Scope. 2014;38(2):57.

43. Albrich JM, McCarthy CA, Hurst JK. Biological reactivity of hypochlorous acid: implications for microbicidal mechanisms of leukocyte myeloperoxidase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1981;78(1):210–4.

44. McKenna SM, Davies K. The inhibition of bacterial growth by hypochlorous acid. Possible role in the bactericidal activity of phagocytes. Biochemical Journal. 1988;254(3):685–92. doi: 10.1042/bj2540685 2848494

45. Ono T, Yamashita K, Murayama T, Sato T. Microbicidal effect of weak acid hypochlorous solution on various microorganisms. Biocontrol science. 2012;17(3):129–33. doi: 10.4265/bio.17.129 23007104

46. Barbieri F, Montanari C, Gardini F, Tabanelli G. Biogenic amine production by lactic acid bacteria: A Review. Foods. 2019;8(1):17.

47. Medina-Sauza RM, Álvarez-Jiménez M, Delhal A, Reverchon F, Blouin M, Guerrero-Analco JA, et al. Earthworms building up soil microbiota, a review. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2019;7:81.

48. Davidson SK, Stahl DA. Transmission of nephridial bacteria of the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(1):769–75. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.1.769-775.2006 16391117

49. Rayson MS, Altarawneh M, Mackie JC, Kennedy EM, Dlugogorski BZ. Theoretical study of the ammonia− hypochlorous acid reaction mechanism. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2010;114(7):2597–606. doi: 10.1021/jp9088657 20112901

50. Tarade T, Vrček V. Reactivity of amines with hypochlorous acid: Computational study of steric, electronic, and medium effects. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry. 2013;113(7):881–90.

51. Shin SP, Kim MS, Cho SH, Kim JH, Choresca CH Jr, Han JE, et al. Antimicrobial effect of hypochlorous acid on pathogenic microorganisms. 2013.

52. Smith WL, Arnt L, Mellett D. Carriers for hypochlorous acid vapor. Google Patents; 2010.

53. Oxychem. Sodium Chlorite Amine Odor Control. USA: Occidental Chemical Corporation, 2018.


Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 12
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
nový kurz
Autori: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#