Preoperative and operation-related risk factors for postoperative nosocomial infections in pediatric patients: A retrospective cohort study
Authors:
Kuanrong Li aff001; Xiaojun Li aff001; Wenyue Si aff001; Yanqin Cui aff002; Huimin Xia aff003; Xin Sun aff004; Xingrong Song aff005; Huiying Liang aff001
Authors place of work:
Institute of Pediatrics, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
aff001; Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Heart Center, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
aff002; Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Structural Birth Defects, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
aff003; Department of Medical Administration, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
aff004; Department of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
aff005
Published in the journal:
PLoS ONE 14(12)
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225607
Summary
Background
Pediatric patients undergoing invasive operations bear extra risk of developing nosocomial infections (NIs). However, epidemiological evidence of the underlying risk factors, which is needed for early prevention, remains limited.
Methods
Using data from the electronic medical records and the NI reporting system of a tertiary pediatric hospital, we conducted a retrospective analysis to identify preoperative and operation-related risk factors for postoperative NIs. Multivariable accelerated failure time models were fitted to select independent risk factors. The performance of these factors in risk stratification was examined by comparing the empirical risks between the model-defined low- and high-risk groups.
Results
A total of 18,314 children undergoing invasive operations were included for analysis. After a follow-up period of 154,700 patient-days, 847 postoperative NIs were diagnosed. The highest postoperative NI rate was observed for operations on hemic and lymphatic system. Surgical site infections were the NI type showing the highest overall risk; however, patients were more likely to develop urinary tract infections in the first postoperative week. Older age, higher weight-for-height z-score, longer preoperative ICU stay, preoperative enteral nutrition, same-day antibiotic prophylaxis, and higher hemoglobin level were associated with delayed occurrence of postoperative NIs, while longer preoperative hospitalization, longer operative duration, and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score showed acceleration effects. Risk stratification based on these factors in an independent patient population was moderate, resulting in a high-risk group in which 72% of the postoperative NIs were included.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that pediatric patients undergoing invasive operations and at high risk of developing postoperative NIs are likely to be identified using basic preoperative and operation-related risk factors, which together might lead to moderately accurate risk stratification but still provide valuable information to guide early and judicious prevention.
Keywords:
Pediatrics – Surgical and invasive medical procedures – Medical risk factors – Pediatric infections – Intensive care units – Nosocomial infections – pediatric surgery – Antibiotic prophylaxis
Introduction
Nosocomial infections (NIs) pose a long-standing challenge to clinical practitioners and remain one of the leading causes of in-hospital mortality [1]. The overall prevalence of NIs varies from 7% in affluent countries to 15% in economically developing countries [2, 3], whereas the most common types of NIs are invariably surgical site infections (SSIs) and device-associated infections [2, 4, 5], suggesting that most of the NIs are attributable to invasive operations.
Pediatric patients undergoing invasive operations face extra risk of developing NIs because of their underdeveloped immune system. According to two European studies, the NI incidence was 2.5% in general pediatric wards and was 17% in surgical wards [6, 7]. From a prevention perspective, by recognizing the preoperative and operation-related factors that enhance patients’ susceptibility to postoperative NIs, healthcare providers would be able to identify vulnerable patients for closer observation and to initiate timely prophylactic treatment when necessary. For adult surgical patients, several epidemiological studies have revealed a wide variety of such factors [8–10], but detailed research in pediatric patients is scarce.
In the present study, we focused on pediatric patients undergoing invasive operations and aimed to identify preoperative and operation-related risk factors for the occurrence of postoperative NIs.
Methods
Study setting and design
The present study was a hospital-based retrospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary referral hospital—Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center—in Guangzhou, China. The data source of this study was the electronic medical records (EMRs) of the pediatric inpatients who underwent invasive procedures between 2016 and 2018.
Extraction of data and ascertainment of study outcomes
Clinical data were derived from the EMRs and then linked to the hospital’s NI reporting system via patient identification numbers. In the EMRs, operative procedures were documented in both text and the procedural codes defined by the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). According to the criteria of the NI reporting system, an infection was considered nosocomial if it occurred > 48 hours after admission. Neonatal infections were considered nosocomial as well if they were acquired during delivery. Diagnoses of specific NI types were made following the criteria from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network [11]. The outcome of interest in the present study was NI diagnosed after invasive operation. For patients with multiple invasive operations and/or multiple postoperative NI episodes, only the first invasive operation and the first postoperative NI were analyzed.
The patient cohort
In the EMR database, we identified 18,314 patients who underwent invasive operations between 2016 and 2018 on one of the following specific systems: the nervous system (ICD-9-CM code: 01–05), respiratory system (ICD-9-CM code: 30–34), cardiovascular system (ICD-9-CM code: 35–39), hemic and lymphatic system (ICD-9-CM code: 40–41), digestive system (ICD-9-CM code: 42–54), urinary system (ICD-9-CM code: 55–59), and musculoskeletal system (ICD-9-CM code: 76–84). The main reason for us to focus on these systems was that the invasive operations performed on these systems except those on the hemic and lymphatic system were the most common ones in our institution. Invasive operations on the hemic and lymphatic system were relatively rare but were included because of the high postoperative NI rate after hemic and lymphatic surgeries.
Ethical considerations
This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center (2019–13600). This study utilized historical data collected during routine clinical practice and the findings of this study will be used only for academic activities; therefore requirement for informed consent from patients was waived.
Statistical analysis
The following candidate risk factors were considered: sex; age, nutritional status measured with weight-for-age z-score (WAZ), and blood test result at admission; lengths of preoperative hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) stay; preoperative enteral nutrition (EN) and parenteral nutrition (PN) support; operative duration; surgical implantation; antibiotic prophylaxis; the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score; surgical wound classification (SWC); and ICD-9-CM code. For patients younger than 10 years of age, WAZ was calculated using the WHO growth standards as the reference. For patients above that age, WAZ is not an appropriate measure of nutritional status and thus was treated as missing. Antibiotic prophylaxis was defined as use of antibiotics on the same day as the operation was performed. In order to retain the patients with missing values in analysis, binary indicators were created to denote data incompleteness, which was the case for WAZ, operative duration, and ASA score. Binary indicators were also created for preoperative ICU, blood test at admission, and surgical incision to distinguish between patients who did and who did not receive these procedures (see Table A in S1 File for a detailed description).
Time to event was defined as the duration from date of operation to date of NI diagnosis or date of discharge, whichever came first. After confirming that the log-transformed time to event was approximately normally distributed, accelerated failure time (AFT) models with log-normal distribution were fitted. In log-normal AFT models, the exponentiated coefficient (eβ) of a factor is interpreted as time ratio (TR) indicating whether this factor would decelerate (eβ >1) or accelerate (eβ <1) the occurrence of the event. The TR estimates can be converted into the number of days by which the time between operation and occurrence of postoperative NIs could be prolonged or shortened using the following formula: ΔT = Tref {exp[βx(x-xref)] −1}, where Tref denotes the time between the operation and the occurrence of postoperative NI for a reference patient, and Xref denotes the risk factor profile of the reference patient.
A reduced model was achieved using backward elimination with a threshold P-value of 0.1. Indicator variable and the variables related to it were handled as a block during variable selection; therefore we chose a less stringent P-value to decrease the possibility of excluding blocks that contain statistically significant risk factors. In order to control for the clinical heterogeneity of the operations, we predetermined that ICD-9-CM code should be included in the models regardless of the result of variable selection. We also built multivariable Cox regression models to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs), which are more commonly used to describe the strengths of risk associations.
In order to examine the clinical applicability of the identified risk factors for risk stratification purpose, we derived a postoperative NI risk score for another data set of 4,383 pediatric patients who underwent invasive operations between January 2019 and May 2019, of them 110 NIs were diagnosed postoperatively. The postoperative NI risk score was calculated by summing up the risk factors weighted by the AFT model coefficients and used the median of this risk score as a cutoff to divide the patients into low- and high-risk groups (Risk score calculation in S1 File). We compared the two groups regarding their empirical postoperative NI risks, which were estimated using the Nelson-Aalen method [12].
All the statistical tests were two-sided with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. All the statistical analyses were performed using the “survival” package in R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Results
Baseline characteristics of the cohort, stratified by the subsequent NI status, are shown in Table 1. Compared with the patients who did not develop postoperative NIs, those who did were relatively younger, had a lower WAZ and longer preoperative hospitalization, and were more likely to have preoperative ICU stay and to receive preoperative nutrition support. The NI group had on average a lower hemoglobin level. Regarding operation-related characteristics, patients in the NI group had an averagely longer operative duration and were more likely to receive surgical implantation and to have higher ASA scores.
During a follow-up of 154,700 patient-days, 847 postoperative NIs were diagnosed, yielding an incidence rate of 5.5 per 1000 PDs. Overall, operations on hemic and lymphatic system were followed by the highest NI rate (11.0 per 1,000 PDs), and SSIs were the most common NI type (Table 2). However, when confined to the first postoperative week, the highest NI risk was observed for cardiovascular operations (Fig 1A), and the NI type with the highest risk was urinary tract infections (UTIs, Fig 1B).
In the full multivariable AFT model, older age, higher WAZ, longer preoperative ICU stay, preoperative EN, antibiotic prophylaxis, and higher hemoglobin level were statistically significantly associated with delayed occurrence of postoperative NIs (Table 3). Longer preoperative hospitalization, blood test at admission, and longer operative duration were statistically significantly associated with advanced occurrence of the events. Backward elimination led to a reduced model including all the prior statistically significant risk factors as well as high ASA score (≥ III). According to the reduced AFT model and given a reference patient who was defined as follows: underwent an invasive operation on the hemic and lymphatic system, age = 12 months, WAZ = −3, days of preoperative hospitalization = 7, preoperative ICU = 0, preoperative EN = 0, preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis = 0, hemoglobin = 100g/L, WBC = 10×109/L, operative duration = 120 minutes, and ASA score = II, the estimated time between invasive operation and the occurrence of postoperative NIs was 56 days. Therefore, antibiotic prophylaxis = 1, preoperative EN = 1, and one year older in age would extend this time by approximately 24, 14, and 4 days, respectively, for otherwise comparable patients; whereas preoperative hospital stay for one more week, one-point increase in ASA score, and one-hour increase in operation duration would advance the occurrence of the postoperative NIs by 11, 10 and 5 days, respectively.
The multivariable Cox model (Table B in S1 File) yielded largely consistent results except for the statistically significant positive association for WBC. In the reduced Cox model, the proportional hazards assumption was not met for age at operation, antibiotic prophylaxis, and operative duration.
Risk stratification based on the reduced AFT model was applied to the patients who underwent invasive operations between January 2019 and May 2019 (n = 4,383). Fig 2 shows the empirical postoperative NI risks in the resulting low- and high-risk groups. Within the first 30 days after operation, the high-risk group (2,191 patients including 79 NIs) showed a consistently higher postoperative NI risk than the low-risk group (2,192 patients including 31 NIs). The 30-day postoperative NI rates were 3.1 and 5.4 per 1,000 PDs for the two groups, respectively, and 72% of the postoperative NIs occurred in the high-risk group.
Discussion
In this retrospective cohort of pediatric inpatients undergoing invasive operations, older age, higher WAZ, longer ICU stay, preoperative EN support, antibiotic prophylaxis, and higher hemoglobin level were associated with delayed occurrence of postoperative NIs, while longer preoperative hospitalization, longer operative duration, and higher ASA score might accelerate the occurrence of the postoperative NIs. Risk stratification based on these factors in the same cohort was moderately accurate.
In this study, NI rate following hemic and lymphatic operations was the highest, probably due to immunodeficiency commonly seen in patients with hematologic diseases. In two studies including one in pediatric surgical patients, the most frequent NI types were SSI [9, 13], -consistent with our results. In the present study, however, the risk of developing UTIs within the first postoperative week was higher than the risks of developing other types of NIs, suggesting that the pathogens causing UTIs might have a relatively short incubation period.
Malnutrition increases the risk of infection by impairing the immune system [14, 15], accounting for the inverse association between WAZ and postoperative NI risk in this study. Increased NI risk in relation to malnutrition has been reported in prior studies, where malnutrition was defined using different measures such as low birth weight and low body mass index [16, 17]. As a biomarker of malnutrition, low hemoglobin level may compromise non-specific immunity and increase susceptibility to infection [18], which explains its inverse association with postoperative NI risk in our cohort.
For the reference patient we defined, we found that one-day increase in ICU stay before operation was associated with a delay of approximately 2 days in the occurrence of postoperative NIs: this was likely to result from the benefits of intensive care, such as close observation and nutrition support. Previous studies reported a positive association between length of ICU stay and NI risk among ICU patients [19, 20], which however was not surprising given the fact that the risk of developing NIs in ICU always accrues as the ICU stay extends. Furthermore, those studies were flawed by reverse causality (i.e. occurrence of NIs in ICU extends ICU stay) and their problematic use of logistic regression to analyze time-to-event data.
In our cohort, longer preoperative hospitalization was associated with an increased postoperative NI risk: one-week longer preoperative hospital stay would accelerate the occurrence of postoperative NIs by 11 days for the reference patient, in line with a previous study in adult surgical patients [21]. Length of preoperative hospitalization is largely a proxy of the severity and complexity of the underlying disease. Moreover, prolonged preoperative hospitalization means extended exposure to pathogens and enhanced possibility of developing hospital-acquired malnutrition [22, 23]: both increase patients’ susceptibility to infections.
Current evidence regarding the association between EN and NI risk is inconclusive [24, 25]. Thus the inverse association between preoperative EN and postoperative NI risk in our cohort warrants confirmation by future studies. EN may cause NIs via contaminated feedings and/or tracheal colonization of gastric organisms; however, it may also reduce infectious complications by maintaining gut structure [26]. It has been well proved that PN increases the risk of BSI because of CVC involvement [27, 28]. In the present study, only a small fraction of PN (<2%) was administered via CVC, which might partly explain the low incidence of BSIs in the present study as well as the null association between PN and the overall NI risk.
Reduced SSI rates due to antibiotic prophylaxis has been reported [29], supporting our finding that antibiotic prophylaxis might delay the occurrence of postoperative NIs by more than 20 days. However, increasing evidence also suggests that antibiotic prophylaxis will cause unnecessary side effects if it is given without indication [30]. In our cohort, antibiotic prophylaxis was common, but lack of detailed data did not allow us to define antibiotic prophylaxis following the established protocols [31, 32] or to determine its necessity and appropriateness in terms of type, timing, and dosage.
The present study supports the finding of a prior study that higher ASA scores might raise the risks of specific NI types including SSI, UTI, and nosocomial pneumonia [9]. Our results also confirm the existing evidence that prolonged operative duration might increase the risks of postoperative SSIs and other complications [33]. As for SWC, the present study only had a low number of patients with contaminated wounds and had none with dirty wounds. It has also been suggested that surgical wounds might be substantially misclassified in clinical practice [34], making it even more difficult to compare our result with those from previous studies, where a positive association between SWC and the overall postoperative NI risk might exist given the increased SSI risk among patients with contaminated or dirty wounds [35, 36].
Epidemiologic studies on postoperative NI incidence and its risk factors are inadequate, especially for pediatric patients; therefore, our findings would enrich the existing knowledge and would inform healthcare providers of a patient’s risk of developing postoperative NIs even before invasive operations. As suggested by our results, a risk score based on basic preoperative and operation-related risk factors might lead to moderately accurate risk stratification. However, using such a risk score would be rewarded with early identification of vulnerable patients, timely prevention, and cautious selection of the postoperative treatment or procedures that might further increase the NI risk.
The strengths of the present study include its relatively large sample size, a variety of possible risk factors to be considered, and proper statistical analysis. From a methodological perspective, despite the largely consistent results, the AFT model was superior to the Cox model in our case, given that the proportional hazards hypothesis could be legitimately violated: for example, the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis will diminish rather than remaining constant over time. Several limitations of the present study should be noted. First, like many other hospital-based studies, this study was subject to selection bias in particular the referral bias, which might limit the generalizability of our results. Second, we were concerned that using ICD-9-CM code at its lowest level of specificity might not be sufficient to control for the invasiveness of the operation and the severity of the underlying disease. Third, several putative risk factors for NIs were either precluded from our analysis or could not be studied thoroughly due to lack of data, such as use of antibiotics and immunosuppressants. Finally, we could not include the NIs that occurred after discharge as no systematic post-hospital follow-up was performed to collect the data.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that pediatric patients undergoing invasive operations and at high risk of developing postoperative NIs are likely to be identified using basic preoperative and operation-related risk factors, which together might lead to moderately accurate risk stratification but still provide valuable information to guide early and judicious prevention.
Supporting information
Zdroje
1. National and state healthcare associated infections: progress report. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. 2016.
2. Allegranzi B, Bagheri Nejad S, Combescure C, Graafmans W, Attar H, Donaldson L, Pittet D. Burden of endemic health-care-associated infection in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011; 377(9761):228–41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61458-4 21146207
3. European Center for Disease Prevention and Control. Annual Epidemiological Report on Communicable Diseases in Europe 2008. In. Stockholm. 2008.
4. Rosenthal VD, Al-Abdely HM, El-Kholy AA, AlKhawaja SAA, Leblebicioglu H, Mehta Y, et al. International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium report, data summary of 50 countries for 2010–2015: Device-associated module. American journal of infection control. 2016; 44(12):1495–504. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.08.007 27742143
5. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. American journal of infection control. 2004; 32(8):470–85. doi: 10.1016/S0196655304005425 15573054
6. Raymond J, Aujard Y. Nosocomial infections in patients: a European, multicenter prospective study. European Study Group. Infection control and hospital epidemiology. 2000; 21(4): 260–63. doi: 10.1086/501755 10782588
7. Kamp-Hopmans TE, Blok HE, Troelstra A, Gigengack-Baars AC, Weersink AJ, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, et al. Surveillance for hospital-acquired infections on surgical wards in a Dutch university hospital. Infection control and hospital epidemiology. 2003; 24(8):584–90. doi: 10.1086/502258 12940579
8. Hooton TM, Haley RW, Culver DH, White JW, Morgan WM, Carroll RJ. The joint associations of multiple risk factors with the occurrence of nosocomial infection. The American journal of medicine. 1981;70(4):960–70. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(81)90562-3 7211932
9. Vazquez-Aragon P, Lizan-Garcia M, Cascales-Sanchez P, Villar-Canovas MT, Garcia-Olmo D. Nosocomial infection and related risk factors in a general surgery service: a prospective study. The Journal of infection. 2003;46(1):17–22. doi: 10.1053/jinf.2002.1073 12504604
10. Garibaldi RA, Cushing D, Lerer T. Risk factors for postoperative infection. The American journal of medicine. 1991;91(3B):158S–63S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90362-2 1928157
11. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. American journal of infection control. 2008;36(5):309–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002 18538699
12. Nelson W. Theory and applications of hazard plotting for censored failure data. Technometrics. 1972;14:945–65.
13. Onen A, Cigdem MK, Geyik MF, Kokoglu OF, Otcu S, Ozturk H, Dokucu AI. Epidemiology and control of nosocomial infections in pediatric surgery. The Journal of hospital infection. 2002; 52(3):166–70. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2002.1285 12419267
14. Solomons NW. Malnutrition and infection: an update. The British journal of nutrition. 2007; 98 Suppl 1:S5–10.
15. Schaible UE, Kaufmann SH. Malnutrition and infection: complex mechanisms and global impacts. PLoS medicine. 2007;4(5):e115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040115 17472433
16. Goldmann DA, Durbin WA Jr., Freeman J. Nosocomial infections in a neonatal intensive care unit. The Journal of infectious diseases. 1981;144(5):449–59. doi: 10.1093/infdis/144.5.449 7310176
17. Rodriguez-Garcia J, Gamino-Iriarte A, Rodea-Montero ER. Nutritional status and nosocomial infections among adult elective surgery patients in a Mexican tertiary care hospital. PloS one. 2015;10(3):e0118980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118980 25803860
18. Hassan TH, Badr MA, Karam NA, Zkaria M, El Saadany HF, Abdel Rahman DM, et al. Impact of iron deficiency anemia on the function of the immune system in children. Medicine. 2016; 95(47):e5395. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005395 27893677
19. Singh-Naz N, Sprague BM, Patel KM, Pollack MM. Risk factors for nosocomial infection in critically ill children: a prospective cohort study. Critical care medicine. 1996;24(5):875–8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199605000-00024 8706468
20. Gilio AE, Stape A, Pereira CR, Cardoso MF, Silva CV, Troster EJ. Risk factors for nosocomial infections in a critically ill population: a 25-month prospective cohort study. Infection control and hospital epidemiology. 2000;21(5):340–2. doi: 10.1086/501770 10823571
21. Bueno Cavanillas A, Rodriguez-Contreras R, Delgado Rodriguez M, Moreno Abril O, Lopez Gigosos R, Guillen Solvas J, Galvez Vargas R. Preoperative stay as a risk factor for nosocomial infection. European journal of epidemiology. 1991;7(6):670–6. doi: 10.1007/bf00218680 1783060
22. Campanozzi A, Russo M, Catucci A, Rutigliano I, Canestrino G, Giardino I, et al. Hospital-acquired malnutrition in children with mild clinical conditions. Nutrition. 2009; 25(5):540–7. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2008.11.026 19230617
23. McWhirter JP, Pennington CR. Incidence and recognition of malnutrition in hospital. BMJ. 1994;308(6934):945–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6934.945 8173401
24. Heyland DK. Nutritional support in the critically ill patients. A critical review of the evidence. Crit Care Clin.1998;14(3):423–40. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0704(05)70009-9 9700440
25. Marik PE, Zaloga GP. Early enteral nutrition in acutely ill patients: a systematic review. Critical care medicine. 2001;29(12):2264–70. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200112000-00005 11801821
26. Pingleton SK. Enteral Nutrition and Infection: Benefits and Risks. Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. 1991;14:581–9.
27. Netto R, Mondini M, Pezzella C, Romani L, Lucignano B, Pansani L, et al. Parenteral Nutrition Is One of the Most Significant Risk Factors for Nosocomial Infections in a Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. JPEN Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition. 2017;41(4):612–8. doi: 10.1177/0148607115619416 26616137
28. Fonseca G, Burgermaster M, Larson E, Seres DS. The Relationship Between Parenteral Nutrition and Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections: 2009–2014. JPEN Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition. 2018;42(1):171–5. doi: 10.1177/0148607116688437 29505142
29. Allen J, David M, Veerman JL. Systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing surgical-site infection. BJS open. 2018;2(3):81–98. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.45 29951632
30. Rangel SJ, Fung M, Graham DA, Ma L, Nelson CP, Sandora TJ. Recent trends in the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery. Journal of surgery. 2011;46(2):366–71.
31. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in pediatric surgical patients. Committee on Infectious Diseases, Committee on Drugs, and Section on Surgery. 1984;74(3):437–9. 6472979
32. Bratzler DW, Houck PM, Surgical Infection Prevention Guideline Writers. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. American journal of surgery. 2005;189(4):395–404. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.01.015 15820449
33. Cheng H, Chen BP, Soleas IM, Ferko NC, Cameron CG, Hinoul P. Prolonged Operative Duration Increases Risk of Surgical Site Infections: A Systematic Review. Surgical infections. 2017; 18(6):722–35. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.089 28832271
34. Levy SM, Holzmann-Pazgal G, Lally KP, Davis K, Kao LS, Tsao K. Quality check of a quality measure: surgical wound classification discrepancies impact risk-stratified surgical site infection rates in appendicitis. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2013; 217(6):969–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.398 24041560
35. Ortega G, Rhee DS, Papandria DJ, Yang J, Ibrahim AM, Shore AD, et al.An evaluation of surgical site infections by wound classification system using the ACS-NSQIP. The Journal of surgical research. 2012;174(1):33–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.05.056 21962737
36. Culver DH, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. The American journal of medicine. 1991; 91(3B):152S–7S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90361-z 1656747
Článok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 12
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Nejasný stín na plicích – kazuistika
- Masturbační chování žen v ČR − dotazníková studie
- Těžké menstruační krvácení může značit poruchu krevní srážlivosti. Jaký management vyšetření a léčby je v takovém případě vhodný?
- Fixní kombinace paracetamol/kodein nabízí synergické analgetické účinky
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Methylsulfonylmethane increases osteogenesis and regulates the mineralization of the matrix by transglutaminase 2 in SHED cells
- Oregano powder reduces Streptococcus and increases SCFA concentration in a mixed bacterial culture assay
- The characteristic of patulous eustachian tube patients diagnosed by the JOS diagnostic criteria
- Parametric CAD modeling for open source scientific hardware: Comparing OpenSCAD and FreeCAD Python scripts