#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Response of rhizosphere bacterial community of Taxus chinensis var. mairei to temperature changes


Authors: Xianghua Yu aff001;  Xinxing Liu aff001;  Xueduan Liu aff001
Authors place of work: School of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, China aff001;  Key Laboratory of Biometallurgy of Ministry of Education, Central South University, Changsha, China aff002;  Key Laboratory of Hunan Province for Comprehensive Utilization of Superiority Plant Resources in Southern Hunan, Hunan University of Science and Engineering, Yongzhou, Hunan, China aff003
Published in the journal: PLoS ONE 14(12)
Category: Research Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226500

Summary

Background

Temperature is a key factor influencing the growth and distribution of Taxus chinensis var. mairei, which is of high medicinal value. However, there is little information about the changes in rhizosphere bacterial community of Taxus chinensis var. maire under different temperatures.

Methods

In this study, the rhizosphere bacterial communities of Taxus chinensis var. maire under a series of temperatures [5°C (T5), 15°C (T15), 25°C (T25), 35°C (T35)] were assessed through high-throughput sequencing. And some taxa annotated as Mitochondria were positively correlated with the activity of SOD.

Results

Activity of peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were increased and decreased respectively with increasing incubation temperature, showing that SOD may be the dominant reactive oxygen species (ROS) detoxifying enzyme in Taxus chinensis var. maire under low temperature. Taxus chinensis var. maire enriched specific bacterial taxa in rhizosphere under different temperature, and the rhizosphere bacterial diversity decreased with increasing temperature.

Conclusion

The results indicated that rhizosphere bacteria may play important role for Taxus chinensis var. maire in coping with temperature changes, and the management of rhizosphere bacteria in a potential way to increase the cold resistance of Taxus chinensis var. mairei, thus improving its growth under low temperature and enlarging its habitats.

Keywords:

Bacteria – Rhizosphere – Plant resistance to abiotic stress – Leaves – Sequence databases – Medicinal plants – superoxide dismutase – Thermal stresses

Introduction

Taxus chinensis var. mairei is an important medicinal plant species, because multiple bioactive compounds with various pharmacological activities have been isolated from it [12]. It is an endemic species mainly distributed in central and southern China. In recent years, it is endangered in China, and the natural forests with Taxus chinensis var. mairei are only found in Guangxi province and the southeastern area of Shanxi province [3]. It is the need of the hour to protect and enlarge its habitats. However, low temperature is a great limiting factor for Taxus chinensis var. mairei growth, making it difficult for Taxus chinensis var. mairei to grow in areas with low temperature, especially in the north of Qinling Mountains in China.

Temperature is a key factor influencing plant distribution and growth [45]. Low temperature has many damaging effects on plants, such as disturbing the stability of proteins, increasing the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and affecting gene and protein expression [5] Malondialdehyde (MDA), a byproduct of enzymatic and oxygen radical-induced lipid peroxidation, is widely used as a biomarker to evaluate oxidative stress in plants [6]. Some plants have evolved several mechanisms to deal with damages by regulating protein synthesis, controlling membrane composition changes, and activating active oxygen scavenging systems. Peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) are two antioxidant enzymes widely distributed in plant cells, which can eliminate ROS [78], and these two enzymes are also considered as sensors to prevent the occurrence of oxidative stress. Plants can achieve low-temperature resistance by acclimation, called “cold acclimation” [9]. In general, cold acclimation consisting of 1, 2, or 3 stages requires days or weeks for full development [10]. And many studies have been conducted to reveal the mechanisms of cold acclimation, and it has been revealed that the C-repeat binding factor (CBF) cold response pathway is closely related with cold acclimation [1113]. However, most of the results were based on the model organism, Arabidopsis thaliana [1415], and there is little information about the cold acclimation of Taxus chinensis var. mairei.

Soil microbe is a vital component in ecosystems, and is greatly impacted by temperature [16]. Wu et al [17]found that contrasting temperatures directly affect the diversity and structure of soil bacterial community, and warming significantly accelerates the temporal turnover of soil bacterial community. In addition, they also revealed the significant correlations between soil bacterial communities and the activity of phosphatase and urease, indicating the changes of bacterial communities were coupled with the changes of functions. Low temperature is also a key factor limiting microbial growth. However, microbial species have developed some strategies to adapt to low temperature, including changes in membrane composition and in the translation and transcription machineries [18]. Koyama et al [19] have found that the response of soil bacterial community to temperature changes was mediated by plants, indicating the close interaction and co-variation between bacterial community and plants. Studies have also found that some plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) could enhance the resistance of plant to cold stress [20], and cold-tolerant PGPRs can be used as bioinoculants for cold stress management [21]. Ait et al. [22] found that the chilling resistance of grapevine plantlets was enhanced by inoculating with a PGPR, Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN, which correlated with the increase in root growth, plantlet biomass, starch, proline, and phenolics. Mishra et al.[21] revealed that inoculation with psychrotolerant Pseudomonads could alleviate cold stress of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The mechanisms of cold resistance enhancement by PGPRs include enhanced physiological condition, membrane modifications, enhanced root proliferation, increased metabolite regulation, enhanced pigmentation and increased ROS detoxifying substances [2325].

Rhizosphere is an environment where plants interact with other organisms. It constitutes the first plant-influenced habitat encountered by soil microbes [26], and it is considered that plant development, growth, and tolerance to abiotic stress (including low temperature) have benefited from rhizosphere microbes [2728]. It has been found that some bacteria in soil could reduce membrane damage and increase the activity of antioxidant enzymes in leaf [29]. However, there is little information about changes in microbial communities in the rhizosphere of Taxus chinensis var. mairei under different temperatures, and correlations between the changes of rhizosphere microbial communities and Taxus chinensis var. mairei growth is also little known. In this study, rhizosphere bacterial community was assessed through high-throughput sequencing, and the aim of this work was to reveal the response of rhizosphere bacterial community of Taxus chinensis var. mairei to temperature changes, and correlations between rhizosphere bacterial community and ROS detoxifying substances in Taxus chinensis var. mairei.

Materials and methods

Experimental design

The plants used in this study are 3 years old Taxus chinensis var. mairei. Before the experiment, plants were incubated under natural conditions for 20 days (23–25 °C, watered every 3 days). After the preculture, the plants were cultivated in plant growth chamber under four temperatures (treatments), 5°C (T5), 15°C (T15), 25°C (T25), 35°C (T35) with 3 replicates for each temperature. The relative humidity of the chamber was 80%. All the plants experienced 12 hours of light and 12 hours of dark a day, and the leaf photosynthetically active radiation was 250–350 μ mol·m-2·s-1.

Sample collection, ROS detoxifying enzymes, and MDA measurement

Leaf samples were collected at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 168 h for ROS detoxifying enzymes and malondialdehyde (MDA) measurement. 5 mature leaves were collected from each plant and weighed. All the leaves were washed three times using distilled water in the same temperature as that in the incubation chamber. Then residual moisture on the surface was dried. The leaves were then homogenized for ROS detoxifying enzymes and MDA measurement. The activity of peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and the content of malondialdehyde (MDA) were measured using relevant kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) according to the user's manual.

The rhizosphere soil samples were collected according to the method described by McPherson et al. [30]. Briefly, after taking out the plants from the soil, shook the roots to remove bulk soil. Then the roots were suspended in a 50 mL tube containing 35 mL sterile phosphate buffer (pH = 6.5). Shook the tubes for 2 min to release the rhizosphere soil. The tubes were then centrifuged, and the supernatant was removed. The soil sediment was used for bacterial community analysis.

Soil DNA extraction, PCR, and high-throughput sequencing

Soil total DNA was extracted from 0.5 g soil using FastR DNA SPIN Kit (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, United States) following the protocol described in the manual.

PCR and high-throughput sequencing were performed according to previous study[31]. In brief, primer set 515F/806R were used to amplify the V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. After purifying with AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, United States), the PCR products were sequenced on a Illumina HiSeq 2500 system. The raw data were deposited in European Nucleotide Archive (Accession No. PRJEB32579).

Analysis of the high-throughput sequencing data

Bioinformatic analysis of the high-throughput sequencing data was performed using Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) (version 1.9.1) [32]according to previous study[31]. The forward and reverse reads were joined with a minimum overlap of 10 bp and maximum allowed 10% mismatches within the overlap region. Low-quality sequences (Phred quality score < 20 or length shorter than 200 bp) were discarded. Chimeras were removed using UCHIME algorithm in USEARCH package (version 10.0.240) [33] against the “Gold” database. The clean reads were then clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 97% similarity using UCLUST method [34]. The most abundant sequence within each OTU was selected as the representative sequence. Taxonomy of each OTU was assigned using RDP Classifier [35] based on the silva 16S database (version 132). Singletons and OTUs not assigned as bacteria (including chloroplast) were removed. The OTU table was normalized by rarefaction to 24000 sequences per sample for statistical analysis.

Statistical analyses

Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) was performed based on Bray-Curtis distance in R (version 3.5.3, vegan package) to analyze bacterial beta diversity in different treatments. Faith’s index and Chao 1 index were calculated to compare bacterial phylogenetic diversity and richness [36]. Correlations between bacterial community and ROS detoxifying enzymes activity, and MDA content were estimated using Mantel test in R (vegan package), the dissimilarity matrices of bacterial community are represented by Bray-Curtis distance, and the dissimilarity matrices of POD, SOD, CAT, and MDA are represented by Euclidean distance. Indicator analysis was done using labdsv package in R.

Results

Changes of ROS detoxifying enzymes and MDA during cold acclimation

Three enzymes (POD, SOD, and CAT) for ROS detoxifying and MDA were measured during the cold acclimation (Fig 1). The three enzymes and MDA varied greatly at the beginning of the incubation. After 12 h, they tended to be stable. The activity of POD increased with increasing incubation temperature (Fig 1A, S1 Table), while that of SOD were opposite, which were higher in the plants incubated at lower temperature (Fig 1B). However, the activities of CAT varied little among treatments (Fig 1C). The content of MDA was the highest in the plants incubated in the temperature of 15°C, and the lowest was observed under 5°C (Fig 1D).

Fig. 1. ROS detoxifying enzymes activity and MDA content.
ROS detoxifying enzymes activity and MDA content.
(A) Changes of POD activity during incubation time. (B) Changes of SOD activity during incubation time. (C) Changes of CAT activity during incubation time. (D) Changes of MDA content during incubation time.

Changes of bacterial community under different temperature

After quality filtering, 467041 high-quality sequences were obtained. The bacterial communities were dominated by 12 phyla including Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Chloroflexi, Planctomycetes, Patescibacteria, Gemmatimonadetes, Nitrospirae, and Cyanobacteria (Fig 2A).

Fig. 2. Bacterial community.
Bacterial community.
(A) Rhizosphere bacterial community composition under different temperature. (B) PCoA ordinations of the Rhizosphere bacterial community based on the Bray–Curtis distance.

The PCoA plot based on Bray-Curtis distance showed the changes in bacterial communities under different treatments (Fig 2B). The first two axes accounted for nearly half of the community. The original soil was obviously separated from the incubated soils. And the treatments under different temperature were separated from each other. The treatment under the temperature from low to high distributed along the diagonal of the PCoA plot, indicating different temperature shaped different bacterial community in Taxus chinensis var. mairei rhizosphere soil.

Indicator species were determined to identify the specific OTUs associated with the different treatment (Table 1). Results showed that Taxus chinensis var. mairei enriched specific bacterial taxa under different temperature.

Tab. 1. Indicator species by treatment regime.
Indicator species by treatment regime.

Changes of bacterial α-diversity under different treatment

Chao 1 and Faith’s index were used to estimate the richness and phylogenetic diversity of the bacterial communities, respectively. Highest bacterial diversity was observed in the Control soil. Soils under different treatments had lower diversity than Control, and the lowest diversity was observed in the T35 soil (Fig 3A and 3B). In addition, bacterial diversity showed significant negative correlation with incubation temperature as analyzed by linear regression (P<0.05) (Fig 3C and 3D).

Fig. 3. Bacterial diversities and their correlation with temperature.
Bacterial diversities and their correlation with temperature.
(A) Chao1 richness of rhizosphere bacterial communities. (B) Faith’s phylogenetic diversity of rhizosphere bacterial communities. Same alphabets above the box indicate no significant difference between treatments (detected by Kruskal-Wallis test at 0.05 level). (C) The correlation between temperature and Chao1 richness. (D) The correlation between temperature and Faith’s phylogenetic diversity.

Correlation analysis of bacterial communities against POD, SOD, CAT, and MDA

The Spearman’s correlation coefficient determined by Mantel test showed that there were no significant correlations between bacterial community and POD, SOD, CAT, and MDA levels (S2 Table). However, the relative abundance of some OTUs significantly correlated with POD and SOD activities (Table 2).

Tab. 2. Spearman correlations between dominant OTUs and POD, SOD.
Spearman correlations between dominant OTUs and POD, SOD.

Discussion

Cold stress is one of the environmental stresses limiting plant growth, productivity, and distribution [9]. The accumulation of ROS is closely associated with cold stress, which deleteriously affects plant tissues, especially the membranes [5]. ROS detoxifying enzymes, including POD, SOD, and CAT, are ubiquitous in plant cell to eliminate the ROS. In this study, the activity of SOD increased under cold stress, and it positively correlated with incubation temperature (Fig 1B), indicating more O2- was produced under lower temperature. However, the activity of POD showed an opposite trend against SOD, and the activity of CAT varied little under different incubation temperatures. This is different from a previous study which indicated that increase in CAT activity was the highest among the three ROS scavengers (SOD, CAT, and POD) under cold temperature. This difference may be due to high abundance of H2O2 than other ROS, as other ROS should firstly be converted to H2O2 for further deoxidation [37]. However, the conversion of H2O2 could be catalyzed by multiple types of antioxidant enzymes, such as ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX)[7], besides POD and CAT. Thus, we speculate that the oxidative stress caused by O2- may play an important role in influencing plant growth under low temperature.

Rhizosphere, the narrow zone between soil particles and plant roots, is of paramount importance for ecosystem services. It contains various types of microbes, including bacteria, fungi, and other microeukaryotes, and is the most active area for biogeochemical cycling [25]. The plant-microbe interaction in the rhizosphere region is closely associated with plant resistance to abiotic stress [27], including cold stress. Through high-throughput sequencing, this study revealed that the rhizosphere bacterial community of Taxus chinensis var. mairei varied with temperature changes (Fig 2, Table 1), indicating that the plant may enrich specific bacterial taxa to help it alleviate cold stress and confront temperature changes. Previous study reported that the inoculation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium could enhance the chilling resistance of Vitis vinifera L. and increase grapevine growth and physiological activity at a low temperature[24]. Another study found that inoculation of tomato with psychrotolerant PGPR increased tomato chilling resistance, reduced membrane damage, and activated antioxidant enzymes by decreasing electrolyte leakage and malondialdehyde content and improving the activity of ROS scavengers, such as SOD, APX, and glutathione synthase (GSH) [29]. In this study, we found that the relative abundance of some bacterial taxa significantly correlated with the activity of POD and/or SOD, which indicated their role in the increase of cold resistance of Taxus chinensis var. mairei. It is notable that the diversity of rhizosphere bacterial community showed negative correlation with temperature, which may indicate that the dependence on bacterial community by the host plant decreased when the cold stress was eliminated.

In summary, some physiological changes in Taxus chinensis var. mairei and the varication of rhizosphere bacterial community of Taxus chinensis var. mairei under serial incubation temperature were revealed. Results indicated that the activity of POD and SOD were increased and decreased respectively with increasing incubation temperature. Different temperatures shaped distinct rhizosphere bacterial communities, and some of the taxa were significantly correlated with the activity of POD and SOD, indicating the important role of rhizobacteria in alleviating cold stress of Taxus chinensis var. mairei. These results also suggest great potential of rhizobacteria in improving the cold tolerance of host plants.

Supporting information

S1 Table [docx]
The activity of ROS detoxifying enzymes and the content of MDA.

S2 Table [docx]
Spearman’s correlation coefficient between bacterial community and POD, SOD, CAT, and MDA determined by Mantel test.


Zdroje

1. Li C, Huo C, Zhang M, Shi Q(2008)Chemistry of Chinese yew, Taxus chinensis var. mairei. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 36: 266–282.

2. Yu JH, Wang YB, Qian H, Zhao YP, Liu BT, et al.(2012)Polyprenols from the needles of Taxus chinensis var. mairei. Fitoterapia 83:831–837. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2012.01.007 22305943

3. Zhang JT, Ru WM(2010)Population characteristics of endangered species Taxus chinensis var. mairei and its conservation strategy in Shanxi, China. Population Ecology 52: 407–416.

4. Woodward FI(1988)Temperature and the distribution of plant species. Symp Soc Exp Biol 42: 59–75. 3270209

5. Ruelland E, Vaultier MN, Zachowski A, Hurry V(2009)Chapter 2 Cold Signalling and Cold Acclimation in Plants, Advances in Botanical Research. Academic Press, pp. 35–150.

6. Sen A, Alikamanoglu S(2013)Antioxidant enzyme activities, malondialdehyde, and total phenolic content of PEG-induced hyperhydric leaves in sugar beet tissue culture. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology—Plant 49:396–404.

7. Szőllősi R(2014)Chapter 3—Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants: An Overview, In: Ahmad P. (Ed.), Oxidative Damage to Plants. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 89–129.

8. Chovanová K, Kamlárová A, Maresch D, Harichová J, Zámocký M(2019)Expression of extracellular peroxidases and catalases in mesophilic and thermophilic Chaetomia in response to environmental oxidative stress stimuli. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 181: 481–490. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.06.035 31228824

9. Palva ET, Welling A, Tahtiharju S, Tamminen I, Puhakainen T, et al.(2001)Cold acclimation and development of freezing and drought tolerance in plants. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on in Vitro Culture and Horticultural Breeding, 277–284.

10. Gusta LV, Trischuk R, Weiser CJ(2005)Plant Cold Acclimation: The Role of Abscisic Acid. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 24:308–318.

11. Thomashow MF(1999)PLANT COLD ACCLIMATION: Freezing Tolerance Genes and Regulatory Mechanisms. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 50:571–599. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.571 15012220

12. Huang YL, Jin DS, Lu CF, Lan XZ, Qiao P, et al.(2016) Proteomic responses associated with freezing tolerance in the callus of the Tibetan alpine plant Saussurea laniceps during cold acclimation. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 124:81–95.

13. Shi Y, Ding Y, Yang S(2018)Molecular Regulation of CBF Signaling in Cold Acclimation. Trends in Plant Science 23:623–637. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.04.002 29735429

14. Kim MH, Sasaki K, Imai R(2009)Cold Shock Domain Protein 3 Regulates Freezing Tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Biological Chemistry 284:23454–23460. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.025791 19556243

15. Lee CM, Thomashow MF(2012)Photoperiodic regulation of the C-repeat binding factor (CBF) cold acclimation pathway and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109:15054–15059. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211295109 22927419

16. Mishra PK, Joshi P, Bisht SC, Bisht JK, Selvakumar G(2011) Cold-Tolerant Agriculturally Important Microorganisms, In: Maheshwari D.K. (Ed.), Plant Growth and Health Promoting Bacteria. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 273–296.

17. Wu J, Xiong J, Hu C, Shi Y, Wang K, et al.(2015)Temperature sensitivity of soil bacterial community along contrasting warming gradient. Applied Soil Ecology 94: 40–48.

18. Barria C, Malecki M, Arraiano CM(2013)Bacterial adaptation to cold. Microbiology-Sgm 159:2437–2443.

19. Koyama A, Steinweg JM, Haddix ML, Dukes JS, Wallenstein MD(2018)Soil bacterial community responses to altered precipitation and temperature regimes in an old field grassland are mediated by plants. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 94(1).

20. Hayat R, Ali S, Amara U, Khalid R, Ahmed I(2010)Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a review. Annals of Microbiology 60:579–598.

21. Mishra PK, Bisht SC, Ruwari P, Selvakumar G, Joshi GK, et al.(2011)Alleviation of cold stress in inoculated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings with psychrotolerant Pseudomonads from NW Himalayas. Archives of Microbiology 193: 497–513. doi: 10.1007/s00203-011-0693-x 21442319

22. AitBarka E, Nowak J, Clement C(2006)Enhancement of chilling resistance of inoculated grapevine plantlets with a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium, Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:7246–7252. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01047-06 16980419

23. Mishra PK, Mishra S, Bisht SC, Selvakumar G, Kundu S, et al. (2009)Isolation, molecular characterization and growth-promotion activities of a cold tolerant bacterium Pseudomonas sp NARs9 (MTCC9002) from the Indian Himalayas. Biological Research 42:305–313. 19915739

24. Barka EA, Nowak J, Clement C(2006)Enhancement of chilling resistance of inoculated grapevine plantlets with a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium, Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72: 7246–7252. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01047-06 16980419

25. Ahkami A.H, Allen WR, Handakumbura PP, Jansson C(2017)Rhizosphere engineering: Enhancing sustainable plant ecosystem productivity. Rhizosphere 3:233–243

26. Mishra PK, Bisht SC, Bisht JK, Bhatt JC(2012) Cold-Tolerant PGPRs as Bioinoculants for Stress Management, In: Maheshwari D.K. (Ed.), Bacteria in Agrobiology: Stress Management. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 95–118.

27. Yang J, Kloepper JW, Ryu CM(2009)Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress. Trends in Plant Science 14(1):0–4.

28. De-la-Peña C, Loyola-Vargas VM(2014)Biotic Interactions in the Rhizosphere: A Diverse Cooperative Enterprise for Plant Productivity. Plant Physiology 166:701–719. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.241810 25118253

29. Subramanian P, Kim K, Krishnamoorthy R, Mageswari A, Selvakumar G, et al. (2016)Cold Stress Tolerance in Psychrotolerant Soil Bacteria and Their Conferred Chilling Resistance in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) under Low Temperatures. PloS one 11: e0161592–e0161592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161592 27580055

30. McPherson MR, Wang P, Marsh EL, Mitchell RB, Schachtman DP(2018)Isolation and Analysis of Microbial Communities in Soil, Rhizosphere, and Roots in Perennial Grass Experiments. JoVE, e57932.

31. Sun R.B, Li WY, Dong WX, Tian YP, Hu C.S, et al.(2018)Tillage Changes Vertical Distribution of Soil Bacterial and Fungal Communities. Front Microbiol 9:699. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00699 29686662

32. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, et al.(2010)QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nature Methods 7: 335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303 20383131

33. Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R(2011)UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27:2194–2200. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 21700674

34. Edgar RC(2010)Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26:2460–2461. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461 20709691

35. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje J.M, Cole JR(2007)Naïve Bayesian Classifier for Rapid Assignment of rRNA Sequences into the New Bacterial Taxonomy. Applied and environmental microbiology 73: 5261–5267. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00062-07 17586664

36. Sun RB, Zhang XX, Guo XS, Wang DZ, Chu HY(2015)Bacterial diversity in soils subjected to long-term chemical fertilization can be more stably maintained with the addition of livestock manure than wheat straw. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 88:9–18.

37. Meng D, Yu X, Ma L, Hu J, Liang Y, et al.(2017)Transcriptomic Response of Chinese Yew (Taxus chinensis) to Cold Stress. Frontiers in plant science 8:468–468. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00468 28503178


Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 12
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
nový kurz
Autori: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#