RNA-sequencing reveals that STRN, ZNF484 and WNK1 add to the value of mitochondrial MT-COI and COX10 as markers of unstable coronary artery disease
Authors:
Paul Holvoet aff001; Bernward Klocke aff002; Maarten Vanhaverbeke aff003; Roxane Menten aff001; Peter Sinnaeve aff003; Emma Raitoharju aff004; Terho Lehtimäki aff004; Niku Oksala aff006; Christian Zinser aff002; Stefan Janssens aff003; Karin Sipido aff001; Leo-Pekka Lyytikainen aff004; Stefano Cagnin aff007
Authors place of work:
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
aff001; Intrexon Bioinformatics Germany, Munich, Germany
aff002; Department of Clinical Cardiology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
aff003; Department of Clinical Chemistry, Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland
aff004; Finnish Cardiovascular Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
aff005; Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
aff006; Department of Biology, CRIBI Biotechnology Centre, Padova, Italy
aff007; CIR-Myo Myology Centre, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
aff008
Published in the journal:
PLoS ONE 14(12)
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225621
Summary
Markers in monocytes, precursors of macrophages, which are related to CAD, are largely unknown. Therefore, we aimed to identify genes in monocytes predictive of a new ischemic event in patients with CAD and/or discriminate between stable CAD and acute coronary syndrome. We included 66 patients with stable CAD, of which 24 developed a new ischemic event, and 19 patients with ACS. Circulating CD14+ monocytes were isolated with magnetic beads. RNA sequencing analysis in monocytes of patients with (n = 13) versus without (n = 11) ischemic event at follow-up and in patients with ACS (n = 12) was validated with qPCR (n = 85). MT-COI, STRN and COX10 predicted new ischemic events in CAD patients (power for separation at 1% error rate of 0.97, 0.90 and 0.77 respectively). Low MT-COI and high STRN were also related to shorter time between blood sampling and event. COX10 and ZNF484 together with MT-COI, STRN and WNK1 separated ACS completely from stable CAD patients. RNA expressions in monocytes of MT-COI, COX10, STRN, WNK1 and ZNF484 were independent of cholesterol lowering and antiplatelet treatment. They were independent of troponin T, a marker of myocardial injury. But, COX10 and ZNF484 in human plaques correlated to plaque markers of M1 macrophage polarization, reflecting vascular injury. Expression of MT-COI, COX10, STRN and WNK1, but not that of ZNF484, PBMCs paired with that in monocytes. The prospective study of relation of MT-COI, COX10, STRN, WNK1 and ZNF484 with unstable CAD is warranted.
Keywords:
Gene expression – Cytokines – Blood – coronary heart disease – Macrophages – Monocytes – RNA sequencing – Stable coronary artery disease
Introduction
Several millions of patients in Western countries are hospitalized each year for chest pain. In approximately half of the cases, chest pain is of cardiac origin [1]. Among these patients approximately 50% exhibit underlying coronary artery disease (CAD) that eventually leads to an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). ACS encompasses the clinical spectrum ranging from unstable angina through acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Since we aim to search biomarkers, a non-invasive approach by performing analyses in peripheral blood was considered to be more convenient and translatable to clinical practice. Moreover, since atherosclerosis is a systemic disease in which monocytes and derived macrophages play a crucial role, we believe that measuring monocyte behaviour in peripheral blood reflects the activity inside the coronary vessel wall. This view is also supported by previous findings where gene expression in peripheral whole blood samples appeared to mirror gene expression changes in the atherosclerotic vascular wall [2].
Previously, we measured members of the cytochrome oxidase (COX) IV complex, because it has been proposed that mitochondrial dysfunction resulting in mitochondrial oxidative stress contributes to development of age‐related metabolic changes and CAD [3, 4]. We demonstrated that low MT‐COI in monocytes of coronary artery disease patients identified a population at risk for new cardiovascular events [5]. However, we had selected cytochrome oxidase as a target a priori, and did not perform an unbiased analysis. Therefore, in this study we performed unbiased RNA sequence analysis followed by several modelling approaches to indentify the best prognostic markers predicting a future event in stable CAD patients and the best markers of ACS at time of blood sampling.
Thus, our first aim was to search for markers improving the prediction of a new ischemic event in stable CAD patients during a 5-year follow-up. Our second aim was to compare gene in stable CAD and ACS patients. We performed an exploratory RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) analysis of RNA isolated from monocytes, precursors of macrophages, followed by selective quantitative validation of robustly differentially expressed genes with qPCR. We confirmed that MT-COI predicted a new event but that striatin (STRN) added to the power. In addition, we found that COX10 and zinc finger 484 were markers of ACS.
Then, we determined if those markers were related to cardiac troponin T in ACS patients, i.e. reflecting myocardial injury [6, 7]. To our surprise, the identified markers did not correlate with cardiac troponin, in this study we measured their expression in atherosclerotic plaques to determine their correlation with markers of vascular injury, in particular M1 macrophage markers. The current work identifies 2 novel markers in addition to members of the COX complex IV, which may improve discrimination between stable and unstable CAD patients.
Materials and methods
Patients and follow-up
All study subjects gave written informed consent. We did not include minors. The clinical study performed at University Hospital Leuven conforms to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Leuven. We included 142 consecutive patients undergoing quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). In 66 patients, CAD was diagnosed as an epicardial coronary stenosis of at least 50% in at least 1 of the coronary arteries. This cohort was studied before, but in here we defined CAD as coronary stenosis of 50 instead of 30% [5]. These patients were all stable at time of blood sampling. Twenty-four (36.4%) of those 66 CAD patients experienced at least 1 new ischemic event during a 5-year follow-up: cardiovascular death (n = 2), ischemic stroke (n = 2), recurrent AMI (n = 1), and recurrent ischemia requiring recurrent ischemia requiring reintervention (n = 19, of which one patient had in-stent restenosis) [5]. Recurrent ischemia (n = 19) was defined as patients with signs of ischemia (ECG changes, angina pectoris, positive stress test), and significant new or progressive coronary lesions on angiography (n = 19, of which one patient had in-stent restenosis. As we hypothesized that monocyte behaviour is related to plaque stability, we included all major adverse cardiovascular events including stroke. Because ischemic stroke and acute myocardial infarction share similar biological processes, and they reflect a frequently used combined endpoint in clinical trials in both stable and unstable coronary artery disease stroke was also included as major cardiovascular event. The two cardiac deaths included one patient with refractory cardiogenic shock and electrical instability because of critical 3-vessel disease. The second patient developed ventricular fibrillation and recurrent MI because of severe in-stent restenosis and died shortly thereafter.
We also included 19 ACS patients, 5 with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 14 with non-ST-elevation MI. Patients with a history of cancer, renal insufficiency, inflammatory disease, treatment with corticosteroids or immunosuppressive drugs, and significant valvular disease were excluded.
Isolation of monocytes
For isolation of monocytes, blood was collected on BD Vacutainer® CPT™ Mononuclear Cell Preparation Tube—Sodium Citrate (Becton Dickinson). CD14+ monocytes were isolated from the Histopaque-1077 leukocyte fraction using CD14 microbeads and LS column in a Midi-Magnetic Cell Isolation Separator (MACS, Miltenyi), as previously published [5]. Only monocytes wich were isolated within 2 hours of blood sampling were analyzed further. The purity of the isolated CD14+ monocytes was >95%, as previously published. The numbers of CD14+ monocytes isolated from 1 ml (approximately 2.5x105) of blood were similar for stable CAD patients without and with a new ischemic event and ACS patients.
RNA sequencing
RNA from monocytes was isolated at KU Leuven as described previously [5]. RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) was performed by Biogazelle (Gent, Belgium) on a subset of patients which were randomly selected for RNAseq, as a discovery cohort. In the next step, validation with qPCR was performed in all patients. Libraries for mRNA sequencing were prepared using the TruSeq stranded mRNA sample prep kit (Illumina). In one run we analyzed 36 samples from three groups of patients. Group 1: stable CAD patients without new ischemic event (n = 11); group 2: stable CAD patients with new event (n = 13); group 3: ACS patients (n = 12) (see methods in S1 Appendix). We performed Mann Whitney test in search of transcripts distinguishing between stable CAD patients with and without a new ischemic event; thus ACS patients were not included. We also wanted to identify transcripts which separated ACS from the two groups of stable CAD patients. Therefore, we performed multinomial logistic regression analysis combined with random forest as a complementary algorithm for modelling using the R-package “randomForest” by Andy Liaw and Matthew Wiener [8] to compare expressions in the three groups of patients (S1 Appendix).
QPCR analysis
Expression of selected genes in monocytes, and PBMCs, was validated with qPCR analysis on the whole cohort of 85 patients as described in S1 Appendix. QPCR analysis of genes in whole blood and PBMCs was performed as in monocytes. The refinement of models from qPCR data of all 85 patients was performed as described in S1 Appendix.
Coronary atherosclerotic plaques
Then, we validated the expression in coronary atherosclerotic plaques. We performed blinded qPCR analysis of extracts from coronary atherosclerotic plaques of 7 patients (patients 1 and 2 and 4–8) and 5 (out of 6) control samples, collected at University of Padova, Italy, described in reference [9]. This study conforms to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. The vascular samples were classified according American Heart Association recommendation [10]. Five were classified as type 7 and two as type 6. Controls were derived from the fragment of coronary samples not affected by plaque formation and with similar expression of several reference genes. We also measured cytokines, chemokines and growth factors in the plasma of these patients and controls.
Peripheral vascular plaques
Gene expressions patterns in peripheral arterial samples were analyzed previously with Illumina HumanHT-12 v3 Expression BeadChip (Illumina, San Diego, CA) analyzing 47,000 transcripts of all known genes, gene candidates, and splice variants in the Tampere Vascular Study [11–13]. This study conforms to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. In the present study, extracts from 29 carotid, 15 abdominal and 24 femoral atherosclerotic plaques and 24 non-atherosclerotic left internal thoracic artery control samples were analyzed in detail. The samples were taken from patients subjected to open vascular surgical procedures in the Division of Vascular Surgery and Heart Centre, Tampere University Hospital. The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Tampere Hospital District. Three plaques were classified as type 3, 4 as type 4, 20 as type 5 and 30 as type 6. The type of 11 plaques could not be determined. Even though the results from plaques were not replicated with qPCR, the accuracy of the RNA micro-array array has been verified by TaqMan qPCR for many other genes in samples from the Tampere Vascular Study [14].
Other measurements
Total and HDL-cholesterol and triglyceride levels were determined with enzymatic methods (Boehringer Mannheim). LDL-cholesterol levels were calculated with the Friedewald formula. Plasma glucose was measured with the glucose oxidase method (on Vitros 750XRC, Johnson & Johnson). Hs-CRP (Beckman Coulter) was measured on an Image 800 Immunochemistry System; Hs-Troponin T (TNT) on a Modular E system (Roche Diagnostics). All laboratory assessments were performed without knowledge of clinical data. Diabetes mellitus was defined as fasting serum glucose levels >125 mg/dl or therapy with oral hypoglycaemic agents or insulin. Plasma was used to analyze cytokine, chemokines and growth factors using the Bioplex instrumentation (Bio-Rad). We used the human cytokine 27-plex panel according to the manufacturer's specificity [9]. Cytokines were analyzed with Assayfit Pro (AssayCloud, Netherlands) using a five parameters logistic regression for the interpolation of calibration points.
Statistical analysis
Two groups of continuous variables were compared with Mann Whitney test; three groups with Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. Categorical data were compared with Fisher’s exact test. RNA expressions were compared with paired Friedman test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. Non-parametric correlations between expression in monocytes and atherosclerotic plaques or between expression in monocytes and blood parameters were determined (GraphPad Prism 6). ROC, Kaplan-Meier and COX proportional hazards regression analysis (MedCalc statistical software) was performed to determine the additive diagnostic value of selected genes in separating stable CAD patients with versus without new ischemic event to age, gender, (ex)-smoking, BMI, blood pressure, type-2 diabetes, HDL- and LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides and hs-C-reactive protein. P-values of less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. We calculated power based on sample size, group means and standard deviations and sample ratio (at 1% error rate).
Results
Patients
Baseline characteristics of patients with stable CAD with (n = 42) and without a new ischemic event (n = 24) and ACS (n = 19) are shown in Table 1. There was no baseline difference in stable CAD patients with versus without a new ischemic event. ACS patients had higher hs-CRP and LDL-cholesterol levels than the two groups of stable CAD patients. ACS patients were somewhat older than stable CAD patients who developed a new ischemic event and tended to be treated less often with a statin. Use of blood pressure lowering and antiplatelet drugs was not different. All ACS patients had received P2Y12 inhibitors and aspirin at time of hospitalization, before blood sampling.
RNA sequencing and validation of gene expression by qPCR analysis
The full set of RNA sequencing data is available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE129935. Analysis of RNA sequencing data identified 20 genes with differential expression according to the patient group (S1 Appendix). We validated their expression with qPCR (Table 2). MT-COI, COX10 and STRN were different between stable CAD patients with and without new ischemic event. RNA expression of COX10 was similar in ACS patients and stable CAD patients with new ischemic event. STRN increased from stable CAD patients without new ischemic event to stable CAD patients with ischemic event to ACS patients. RNA expressions of SMIM9, TET2, RNF121, KDM5A, PRRC2C, TAF1, WNK1, ZNF484, AAMP and STK6 were different in ACS patients than in the two groups of stable CAD patients; their RNA expressions were similar in stable CAD patients with and without new ischemic event (Table 2).
MT-COI and STRN are associated with new ischemic event in stable CAD patients
The gene expression heat map shows separation of stable CAD patients with and without new ischemic event according to the gene expression of MT-COI, STRN and COX10 determined by RNA sequencing (Fig 1).
ROC analysis confirmed that MT-COI, STRN and COX10 RNA are related to new ischemic event in CAD patients (Fig 2).
Power for separation of patients with and without new ischemic event was 0.97 for MT-COI (at 1% error rate), 0.90 for STRN and 0.77 for COX10. The accuracy for separating stable CAD patients with and without a new ischemic event increased from 67 to 80% by adding MT-COI and STRN to established cardiovascular risk factors age, gender, (ex)-smoking, BMI, blood pressure, type-2 diabetes, HDL- and LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides and hs-C-reactive protein. AUC increased from 0.66 (0.53–0.77) to 0.84 (0.73–0.92). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that MT-COI and STRN were related with the time between blood sampling and occurrence of new ischemic event (Fig 3).
COX proportional hazards regression analysis confirmed that MT-COI and STRN, but not COX10, were independently related to time to new event adjusting for age, gender, (ex)-smoking, BMI, blood pressure, type-2 diabetes, HDL- and LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides and hs-C-reactive protein. HR was 5.94 (95% CI: 2.47–14) for MT-COI and 4.47 (95% CI: 1.75–11) for STRN. That COX10 was not independently related may be due to the high correlation between MT-COI and COX10 (Rs = 0.45; P<0.0001).
MT-COI, WNK1, STRN, COX10 and ZNF484 separate ACS from stable CAD patients
The gene expression heat map shows complete separation of ACS from stable CAD patients with and without new ischemic event according to the gene expression of MT-COI, WNK1, STRN, COX10 and ZNF484 determined by RNA sequencing (Fig 4).
Finally, these four genes significantly improved the clustering of patients into three groups compared to the whole collection of genes with significant differences in expression in the 3 groups in RNA-Seq analysis (Fig 5).
We then performed modelling in search of minimal gene groups which discriminated between ACS patients and the whole group of stable CAD patients, independent of a new ischemic event. We identified three models containing 3 genes which distinguished ACS from the whole group of CAD patients with an accuracy of 90%; COX10 and ZNF484 were present in all 3 models. The minimal model, with an accuracy of 90% consisted of COX10 and ZNF484. The sensitivity of COX10 and ZNF484 was 89% (95% CI: 52–99%). The specificity was 91% (95% CI: 52–99%). AUC was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.89–0.99) (Table 3).
We then determined if RNA expressions correlated with TNT peak levels in ACS patients. MT-COI (Rs = -0.045; p = 0.86), COX10 (Rs = -0.12; p = 0.61), STRN (Rs = -0.21; p = 0.39), WNK1 (Rs = -0.041; p = 0.87) and ZNF484 (Rs = -0.044; p = 0.86) did not correlate with TNT.
Comparison of gene expression in monocytes with that in PBMCs and whole blood
Originally, we measured gene expression in monocytes because they are the precursors of macrophages. However, dependency on monocytes may hamper further validation, because their isolation is difficult to implement in clinical practice. Therefore, we also measured gene expression in whole blood and PBMCs of the same patients (n = 20). The expressions of MT-COI (0.71±0.10 vs. 0.88±0.11), COX10 (1.06±0.16 vs. 0.99±0.14), STRN (1.04±0.19 vs. 1.02±0.13) and WNK1 (0.95±0.23 vs. 1.14±0.15), but not ZNF484 (1.65±0.44 vs. 0.76±0.14), in PBMCs matched with these in monocytes. The expressions of COX10 (1.11±0.23), STRN (1.04±0.22) and WNK1 (0.8800780.26) in whole blood corresponded to these in monocytes; that of MTCOI did not.
RNA expression in monocytes is independent of cholesterol lowering and antiplatelet treatment
Finally, we divided CAD patients according to medical therapies. The expression of three RNA tertiles of MT-COI (χ2 = 3.78; p = 0.15), COX10 (χ2 = 1.92; p = 0.38), STRN (χ2 = 1.37; p = 0.50), WNK1 (χ2 = 2.75; p = 0.25) and ZNF484 (χ2 = 0.014; p = 0.99) did not depend on statin use. The number of patients in the three tertiles of MT-COI (χ2 = 2.27; p = 0.32), COX10 (χ2 = 3.62; p = 0.16), STRN (χ2 = 0.78; p = 0.68), WNK1 (χ2 = 2.75; p = 0.25) and ZNF484 (χ2 = 0.068; p = 0.97) did also not depend on the treatment with antiplatelet drugs.
Validation of expression of genes in human atherosclerotic plaques
Table 4 shows that the expression of the COX10 gene was decreased in human coronary atherosclerotic plaques. Blood levels of cytokines IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, the macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α and MIP-1β, the chemotactic protein MCP-1 and the growth factor VEGF were elevated in cases with atherosclerosis versus controls. COX10 correlated inversely with all of them. In contrast, the eosinophil chemotactic protein eotaxin was not different and COX10 did not correlate with it.
The expression of ZNF484 was increased (6.15±1.80 vs. 1.01±0.13; P = 0.028) in human coronary atherosclerotic plaques; but it did not correlate with cytokines, chemokines or VEGF. Expression of WNK1 was not significantly different (0.82±0.38 vs. 1.00±0.077; P = 0.260). Expressions of MT-COI were very variable most likely due to very low expressions.
As in coronary plaques, COX10 expressions were lower in peripheral atherosclerotic plaques than in control samples, whereas ZNF484 was higher. In addition, the expression of markers of inflammatory macrophages, CCL2 and CCR7 was higher in atherosclerotic plaques. In contrast, the expression of markers of M2 macrophages CD36 and IL-4 was not different between atherosclerotic plaques and control samples (Fig 6).
COX10 correlated negatively with CCL2 and CCR7; ZNF484 correlated positively with CCL2 and CCR7 (Fig 7). They did not correlate with markers of M2 macrophages.
Discussion
RNA sequencing and qPCR analysis revealed that RNA expression levels of MT-COI and STRN improved separation of stable CAD patients according to their risk of a new ischemic event. RNA levels of COX10 were lower in CAD patients with a recurrent event, and resembled expression in patients with ACS and atherosclerotic plaques. ZNF484 was higher in ACS than in the two groups of stable CAD and also resembled expression in atherosclerotic plaques. Our data suggest that such RNA markers may allow us to intensify treatment upfront in patients with presumed progressive CAD, or to identify patients in which initiation of a new therapy is not directly needed because of very low risk. This hypothesis warrants to be tested in future studies.
The importance of a biomarker may also be underpinned by its role in the development of the disease. MT-COI is an important regulator of the cytochrome oxidase IV complex, the terminal node and rate limiting step in the mitochondrial electron transport chain, is associated with mitochondrial oxidative stress [15, 16], a condition associated with obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes [17, 18]. A single mutation in mouse MT-COI was associated with loss of COX activity [19], despite normal assembly of the complex IV [20]. Recently, we found that low MT-COI in isolated plaque macrophages in pigs was associated with complex coronary plaques and oxidized LDL [21].
COX10 is required for COX biogenesis [22] and is an important regulator of T cell activation, differentiation and signalling [23, 24]. For the first time we found that COX10 RNA expression was inversely related to blood levels of inflammation markers IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, MIP-1α and MIP-1β, and MCP-1, and plaque protein levels of CCL2 and CCR7. CCL2 or MCP-1 is a marker of the persistent infiltration of low-grade inflammatory monocytes contributing to aggravated atherosclerosis [25]. In mice, we demonstrated that increased MCP-1 was associated with decreased interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-3 (Irak3 or IrakM), a regulator of innate immune function and increased mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production [26]. The motility CCR7 receptor may have a dual role in atherosclerosis. It leads to increased monocyte infiltration and macrophage accumulation in the growing atherosclerotic plaque [27]. But once plaques have been developed, it is required for plaque regression because it drives macrophage to egress from lesions [28].
The striatin protein family that is part of the striatin interaction phosphatases and kinases complex contains multidomain scaffolding proteins that play important role in cell adhesion [29]. Striatin-deficiency was found to increase vasoconstriction and decrease vascular relaxation [30]. It may decrease smooth muscle cell migration but enhance endothelial cell migration [31]. It assembles a membrane signalling complex necessary for rapid, nongenomic activation of endothelial NO synthase in endothelial cells [32].
For the first time we demonstrate an increase of ZNF484 in monocytes of unstable CAD patients as well as in human atherosclerotic lesions. ZNF484 is a Krüppel-associated box (KRAB) zinc-finger protein [33]. Overexpression of a group of KRAB-containing transcription factors in CD14+ monocytes of atherosclerotic patients resulted in increasing the expression of inflammation-related genes [34–37]. Our study shows that an increase of ZNF484 is associated with M1 macrophage polarization in human atherosclerotic plaques.
Interestingly, we did not observe differences in gene expression profiles according to treatment with statins or antiplatelet drugs. In light of the recent observation of the CANTOS trial [38, 39], it is hypothesized that there is a synergistic effect between the inflammatory burden leading to atherosclerosis on one side, and the traditional lipid burden. In line with these findings as well as ours, we may hypothesize that the measured RNA biomarkers in monocytes more reflect the inflammatory activation rather than the lipid metabolism. In addition, although activated platelets indeed do exert some pro-inflammatory effects, most if not all of the benefit of antiplatelet effects is clearly related to their antithrombotic properties. Although P2Y12 inhibitors have been shown to be able modulate inflammatory pathways in platelets and (for ticagrelor) neutrophils, the clinical benefit of these agents is still considered to be to most extent due to their ability to prevent arterial thrombosis.
A limitation of our study is the rather small number of patients, and the lack of validation in an independent population, thus requiring independent prospective validation. But it is noteworthy that differences in RNA expression patterns of COX10 and ZNF484 between atherosclerotic plaques and control arteries are similar as those between expression patterns in monocytes from ACS vs. stable CAD patients. Here we found that low MT-COI and STRN were related to a faster development of an event. Because of the low numbers, we were not able to categorize patients according to the type of event. We are aware that by including new biomarkers in clinical validation the volume of per-patient biomarker measurements for screening, monitoring, and diagnosing is poised to increase substantially. However, our research is timely because the number of applications utilizing real-time PCR (qPCR) is expanding rapidly. The improved accuracy of results relative to end-point PCR, multiplexing capability which decreased analysis cost, and reduced time are factors contributing to the growth of qPCR. For example, innovative technology allows to directly amplify a range of RNA targets from crude samples in-field in under 60 minutes via a closed tube real-time one step reaction without the need for a separate lab based nucleic acid extraction process. Especially the use of mcrochips will lead to rapid and sensitive detection of multiple targets possibly within 20 minutes [40, 41]. Portable microfluidic platforms may be very attractive in developing point-of-care diagnostics and precision medicine [42]. In additon, several machine-learning algorithms such as random forest, logistic regression, gradient boosting, and neural networks are now available to improve risk prediction [43–45]. In this study we used a non-invasive approach by performing analyses in peripheral blood because this is more convenient and translatable to clinical practice. On the other hand, a followup study should compare gene expression in both peripheral whole blood samples and coronary sinus blood samples in order to validate selected RNAs as cardiac markers.
Conclusion
This work showed that MT-COI and STRN predict a new ischemic event in stable CAD patients whereas COX10 and ZNF484 have the potential to discriminate between stable CAD and ACS. Our data warrants further investigation of their interaction in atherosclerosis, plaque rupture and the development of unstable cardiovascular diseases.
Supporting information
Zdroje
1. Lenfant C. Chest pain of cardiac and noncardiac origin. Metabolism. 2010;59 Suppl 1:S41–6. Epub 2010/09/21. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2010.07.014 20837193.
2. Sinnaeve PR, Donahue MP, Grass P, Seo D, Vonderscher J, Chibout SD, et al. Gene expression patterns in peripheral blood correlate with the extent of coronary artery disease. PLoS One. 2009;4(9):e7037. Epub 2009/09/15. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007037 19750006; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2736586.
3. Wallace DC. A mitochondrial paradigm of metabolic and degenerative diseases, aging, and cancer: a dawn for evolutionary medicine. Annu Rev Genet. 2005;39:359–407. Epub 2005/11/16. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.110304.095751 16285865; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2821041.
4. Wallace DC. The mitochondrial genome in human adaptive radiation and disease: on the road to therapeutics and performance enhancement. Gene. 2005;354:169–80. Epub 2005/07/19. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2005.05.001 16024186.
5. Holvoet P, Vanhaverbeke M, Bloch K, Baatsen P, Sinnaeve P, Janssens S. Low MT-CO1 in Monocytes and Microvesicles Is Associated With Outcome in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(12). Epub 2016/12/07. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004207 27919931; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5210432.
6. Chapman AR, Lee KK, McAllister DA, Cullen L, Greenslade JH, Parsonage W, et al. Association of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Concentration With Cardiac Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome. JAMA. 2017;318(19):1913–24. Epub 2017/11/12. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17488 29127948; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5710293.
7. Park KC, Gaze DC, Collinson PO, Marber MS. Cardiac troponins: from myocardial infarction to chronic disease. Cardiovasc Res. 2017;113(14):1708–18. Epub 2017/10/11. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvx183 29016754; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5852618.
8. Svetnik V, Liaw A, Tong C, Culberson JC, Sheridan RP, Feuston BP. Random forest: a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2003;43(6):1947–58. Epub 2003/11/25. doi: 10.1021/ci034160g 14632445.
9. Cagnin S, Biscuola M, Patuzzo C, Trabetti E, Pasquali A, Laveder P, et al. Reconstruction and functional analysis of altered molecular pathways in human atherosclerotic arteries. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:13. Epub 2009/01/13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-13 19134193; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2654039.
10. Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, Fuster V, Glagov S, Insull W Jr., et al. A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1995;92(5):1355–74. Epub 1995/09/01. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.5.1355 7648691.
11. Oksala N, Levula M, Airla N, Pelto-Huikko M, Ortiz RM, Jarvinen O, et al. ADAM-9, ADAM-15, and ADAM-17 are upregulated in macrophages in advanced human atherosclerotic plaques in aorta and carotid and femoral arteries—Tampere vascular study. Ann Med. 2009;41(4):279–90. Epub 2009/03/03. doi: 10.1080/07853890802649738 19253070.
12. Niinisalo P, Oksala N, Levula M, Pelto-Huikko M, Jarvinen O, Salenius JP, et al. Activation of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-induced tryptophan degradation in advanced atherosclerotic plaques: Tampere vascular study. Ann Med. 2010;42(1):55–63. Epub 2009/11/28. doi: 10.3109/07853890903321559 19941414.
13. Oksala N, Parssinen J, Seppala I, Raitoharju E, Kholova I, Hernesniemi J, et al. Association of neuroimmune guidance cue netrin-1 and its chemorepulsive receptor UNC5B with atherosclerotic plaque expression signatures and stability in human(s): Tampere Vascular Study (TVS). Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2013;6(6):579–87. Epub 2013/10/15. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.113.000141 24122613.
14. Raitoharju E, Seppala I, Lyytikainen LP, Levula M, Oksala N, Klopp N, et al. A comparison of the accuracy of Illumina HumanHT-12 v3 Expression BeadChip and TaqMan qRT-PCR gene expression results in patient samples from the Tampere Vascular Study. Atherosclerosis. 2013;226(1):149–52. Epub 2012/11/28. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.10.078 23177970.
15. Poyton RO, McEwen JE. Crosstalk between nuclear and mitochondrial genomes. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:563–607. Epub 1996/01/01. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.003023 8811190.
16. Villani G, Attardi G. In vivo control of respiration by cytochrome c oxidase in wild-type and mitochondrial DNA mutation-carrying human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(4):1166–71. Epub 1997/02/18. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.4.1166 9037024; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC19762.
17. Holvoet P, Lee DH, Steffes M, Gross M, Jacobs DR Jr., Association between circulating oxidized low-density lipoprotein and incidence of the metabolic syndrome. JAMA. 2008;299(19):2287–93. Epub 2008/05/22. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.2287 18492970; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2562739.
18. Park K, Gross M, Lee DH, Holvoet P, Himes JH, Shikany JM, et al. Oxidative stress and insulin resistance: the coronary artery risk development in young adults study. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(7):1302–7. Epub 2009/04/25. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0259 19389821; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2699736.
19. Acin-Perez R, Bayona-Bafaluy MP, Bueno M, Machicado C, Fernandez-Silva P, Perez-Martos A, et al. An intragenic suppressor in the cytochrome c oxidase I gene of mouse mitochondrial DNA. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12(3):329–39. Epub 2003/01/30. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg021 12554686.
20. Fukuda R, Zhang H, Kim JW, Shimoda L, Dang CV, Semenza GL. HIF-1 regulates cytochrome oxidase subunits to optimize efficiency of respiration in hypoxic cells. Cell. 2007;129(1):111–22. Epub 2007/04/10. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.047 17418790.
21. Holvoet P, Vanhaverbeke M, Geeraert B, De Keyzer D, Hulsmans M, Janssens S. Low Cytochrome Oxidase 1 Links Mitochondrial Dysfunction to Atherosclerosis in Mice and Pigs. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0170307. Epub 2017/01/26. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170307 28122051; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5266248.
22. Diaz F, Thomas CK, Garcia S, Hernandez D, Moraes CT. Mice lacking COX10 in skeletal muscle recapitulate the phenotype of progressive mitochondrial myopathies associated with cytochrome c oxidase deficiency. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14(18):2737–48. Epub 2005/08/17. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi307 16103131; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2778476.
23. Tarasenko TN, Pacheco SE, Koenig MK, Gomez-Rodriguez J, Kapnick SM, Diaz F, et al. Cytochrome c Oxidase Activity Is a Metabolic Checkpoint that Regulates Cell Fate Decisions During T Cell Activation and Differentiation. Cell Metab. 2017;25(6):1254–68 e7. Epub 2017/06/08. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.05.007 28591633; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5562283.
24. Tan H, Yang K, Li Y, Shaw TI, Wang Y, Blanco DB, et al. Integrative Proteomics and Phosphoproteomics Profiling Reveals Dynamic Signaling Networks and Bioenergetics Pathways Underlying T Cell Activation. Immunity. 2017;46(3):488–503. Epub 2017/03/14. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.02.010 28285833; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5466820.
25. Geng S, Chen K, Yuan R, Peng L, Maitra U, Diao N, et al. The persistence of low-grade inflammatory monocytes contributes to aggravated atherosclerosis. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13436. Epub 2016/11/09. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13436 27824038; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5105176.
26. Hulsmans M, Geeraert B, Arnould T, Tsatsanis C, Holvoet P. PPAR agonist-induced reduction of Mcp1 in atherosclerotic plaques of obese, insulin-resistant mice depends on adiponectin-induced Irak3 expression. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e62253. Epub 2013/04/27. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062253 23620818; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3631170.
27. Schieffer B, Luchtefeld M. Emerging role of chemokine receptor 7 in atherosclerosis. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2011;21(8):211–6. Epub 2012/08/21. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2012.05.012 22902067.
28. Mueller PA, Zhu L, Tavori H, Huynh K, Giunzioni I, Stafford JM, et al. Deletion of Macrophage Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein 1 (LRP1) Accelerates Atherosclerosis Regression and Increases C-C Chemokine Receptor Type 7 (CCR7) Expression in Plaque Macrophages. Circulation. 2018;138(17):1850–63. Epub 2018/05/26. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031702 29794082; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6343494.
29. Lahav-Ariel L, Caspi M, Nadar-Ponniah PT, Zelikson N, Hofmann I, Hanson KK, et al. Striatin is a novel modulator of cell adhesion. FASEB J. 2018:fj201801882R. Epub 2018/12/29. doi: 10.1096/fj.201801882R 30592649.
30. Garza AE, Pojoga LH, Moize B, Hafiz WM, Opsasnick LA, Siddiqui WT, et al. Critical Role of Striatin in Blood Pressure and Vascular Responses to Dietary Sodium Intake. Hypertension. 2015;66(3):674–80. Epub 2015/07/15. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.05600 26169051; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4537321.
31. Zheng S, Chen X, Hong S, Long L, Xu Y, Simoncini T, et al. 17beta-Estradiol inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell migration via up-regulation of striatin protein. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015;31(8):618–24. Epub 2015/07/30. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2015.1021325 26220767.
32. Lu Q, Pallas DC, Surks HK, Baur WE, Mendelsohn ME, Karas RH. Striatin assembles a membrane signaling complex necessary for rapid, nongenomic activation of endothelial NO synthase by estrogen receptor alpha. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(49):17126–31. Epub 2004/12/01. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407492101 15569929; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC534607.
33. Bellefroid EJ, Poncelet DA, Lecocq PJ, Revelant O, Martial JA. The evolutionarily conserved Kruppel-associated box domain defines a subfamily of eukaryotic multifingered proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88(9):3608–12. Epub 1991/05/01. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.9.3608 2023909; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC51501.
34. Schirmer SH, Fledderus JO, van der Laan AM, van der Pouw-Kraan TC, Moerland PD, Volger OL, et al. Suppression of inflammatory signaling in monocytes from patients with coronary artery disease. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2009;46(2):177–85. Epub 2008/12/09. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2008.10.029 19059264.
35. Margolin JF, Friedman JR, Meyer WK, Vissing H, Thiesen HJ, Rauscher FJ 3rd. Kruppel-associated boxes are potent transcriptional repression domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91(10):4509–13. Epub 1994/05/10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.10.4509 8183939; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC43815.
36. Friedman JR, Fredericks WJ, Jensen DE, Speicher DW, Huang XP, Neilson EG, et al. KAP-1, a novel corepressor for the highly conserved KRAB repression domain. Genes Dev. 1996;10(16):2067–78. Epub 1996/08/15. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.16.2067 8769649.
37. Wolf G, Greenberg D, Macfarlan TS. Spotting the enemy within: Targeted silencing of foreign DNA in mammalian genomes by the Kruppel-associated box zinc finger protein family. Mob DNA. 2015;6:17. Epub 2015/10/06. doi: 10.1186/s13100-015-0050-8 26435754; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4592553.
38. Ridker PM. Canakinumab for Residual Inflammatory Risk. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(48):3545–8. Epub 2017/12/28. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx723 29281019.
39. Ridker PM, Everett BM, Thuren T, MacFadyen JG, Chang WH, Ballantyne C, et al. Antiinflammatory Therapy with Canakinumab for Atherosclerotic Disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(12):1119–31. Epub 2017/08/29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707914 28845751.
40. Powell L, Wiederkehr RS, Damascus P, Fauvart M, Buja F, Stakenborg T, et al. Rapid and sensitive detection of viral nucleic acids using silicon microchips. Analyst. 2018;143(11):2596–603. Epub 2018/05/10. doi: 10.1039/c8an00552d 29741175.
41. Cornelis S, Fauvart M, Gansemans Y, Vander Plaetsen AS, Colle F, Wiederkehr RS, et al. Multiplex STR amplification sensitivity in a silicon microchip. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):9853. Epub 2018/07/01. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28229-9 29959383; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6026139.
42. Wang H, Zhang X, Xu X, Zhang Q, Wang H, Li D, et al. A portable microfluidic platform for rapid molecular diagnostic testing of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):8596. Epub 2017/08/19. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08674-8 28819248; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5561050.
43. Goldstein BA, Navar AM, Carter RE. Moving beyond regression techniques in cardiovascular risk prediction: applying machine learning to address analytic challenges. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(23):1805–14. Epub 2016/07/21. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw302 27436868; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5837244.
44. Weng SF, Reps J, Kai J, Garibaldi JM, Qureshi N. Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data? PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0174944. Epub 2017/04/05. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174944 28376093; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5380334.
45. Mandl KD, Manrai AK. Potential Excessive Testing at Scale: Biomarkers, Genomics, and Machine Learning. JAMA. 2019. Epub 2019/02/09. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0286 30735228.
Článok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 12
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Nejasný stín na plicích – kazuistika
- Masturbační chování žen v ČR − dotazníková studie
- Úspěšná resuscitativní thorakotomie v přednemocniční neodkladné péči
- Fixní kombinace paracetamol/kodein nabízí synergické analgetické účinky
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Methylsulfonylmethane increases osteogenesis and regulates the mineralization of the matrix by transglutaminase 2 in SHED cells
- Oregano powder reduces Streptococcus and increases SCFA concentration in a mixed bacterial culture assay
- The characteristic of patulous eustachian tube patients diagnosed by the JOS diagnostic criteria
- Parametric CAD modeling for open source scientific hardware: Comparing OpenSCAD and FreeCAD Python scripts