Concurrent validity and discriminative ability of Dutch performance-based motor tests in 5 to 6 years old children

English version

Autoři: Marlou L. A. de Kroon ^aff001; Willem G. van Kernebeek ^aff002; Britta F. Neve ^aff002; Jessica M. ter Veer ^aff002; Sijmen A. Reijneveld ^aff001; Henrica C. W. de Vet ^aff003; Huub M. Toussaint ^aff002
Působiště autorů: Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands ^aff001; Faculty of Sports and Nutrition, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ^aff002; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ^aff003
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(11)
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224722

Souhrn

Aim

To assess the concurrent validity and discriminative ability of total, gross and fine motor (TM, GM and FM) scores of Dutch performance-based motor tests, the Baecke-Fassaert Motor Test (BFMT) and the 8- and 4-Skills Scan (SkSc) with the Movement Assessment Battery (MABC) for children at age 5.

Method

116 Dutch children (40.3% boys) were included. Spearman’s rho correlations and area under the curves (AUC) were assessed.

Results

Correlations between the TM scores of the tests were strong (absolute values from 0.58 to .65); the correlations between the GM scores and the FM scores between and within tests were weaker (absolute values from 0.30 to 0.45). Related to the cut-off (15^th percentile) of the MABC, the AUC of the BFMT, 8- and 4-SkSc, the AUC was 0.853 (95% CI: 0.757–0.949), 0.905 (95% CI: 0.837–0.972) and 0.844 (95% CI: 0.730–0.957), respectively. At optimal cut-offs, the sensitivity and specificity of the BFMT, the 8- and 4-SkSc were 78.6 and 78.4%, 92.2 and 73.2%, 78.6 and 76.3%, respectively.

Conclusion

All tests had a reasonably high discriminative ability, but validation with the MABC-2 and adaptations are needed to meet the requirements for screening (i.e. sensitivity ≥80% and specificity ≥90%). The relatively weak correlation between GM and FM scores implies that tests should be normalized and validated for GM and FM ability, separately.

Klíčová slova:

Teachers – Schools – Children – Research assessment – Child development – Musculoskeletal system – Dutch people – Decision making

Zdroje

1. Kurtz LA. Understanding motor skills in children with dyspraxia, ADHD, autism, and other learning disabilities: a guide to improving coordination. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2008.

2. Edwards J, Berube M, Erlandson K, Haug S, Johnstone H, Meagher M, et al. Developmental Coordination Disorder in school-aged children born very preterm and/or at very low birth weight: A systematic review: J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2011;32: 678–687. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31822a396a 21900828

3. Wilson PH. Practitioner Review: Approaches to assessment and treatment of children with DCD: an evaluative review. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005;46: 806–823. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01409.x 16033630

4. Faigenbaum AD, Stracciolini A, Myer GD. Exercise deficit disorder in youth: a hidden truth. Acta Paediatr. 2011;100: 1423–1425. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02461.x 21895766

5. Vannatta K, Gartstein MA, Zeller M, Noll RB. Peer acceptance and social behavior during childhood and adolescence: How important are appearance, athleticism, and academic competence? Int J Behav Dev. 2009;33: 303–311. doi: 10.1177/0165025408101275

6. Schoemaker MM, Kalverboer AF. Social and Affective Problems of Children Who Are Clumsy: How Early Do" bey Begin? Adapt Phys Act Q. 1994;11: 140.

7. Skinner RA, Piek JP. Psychosocial implications of poor motor coordination in children and adolescents. Hum Mov Sci. 2001;20: 73–94. doi: 10.1016/s0167-9457(01)00029-x 11471399

8. Bellman M, Byrne O, Sege R. Developmental assessment of children. BMJ. 2013;346: e8687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e8687 23321410

9. Blank R, Barnett AL, Cairney J, Green D, Kirby A, Polatajko H, et al. International clinical practice recommendations on the definition, diagnosis, assessment, intervention, and psychosocial aspects of developmental coordination disorder. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019;61: 242–285. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14132 30671947

10. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, 5th edition (DSM-V). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.

11. Nordahl-Hansen A, Kaale A, Ulvund SE. Language assessment in children with autism spectrum disorder: Concurrent validity between report-based assessments and direct tests. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2014;8: 1100–1106. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2014.05.017

12. Boere-Boonekamp MM, van Sleeuwen B, Wagenaar-Fischer M, Ouwehand LM, de Vries SI. A youth health care guideline for screening the motor development of children: a feasibility study. TNO quality of life [Een jeugdgezondheidszorg richtlijn voor screening van de motorische ontwikkeling van kinderen: een haalbaarheidsstudie]. Leiden: TNO Kwaliteit van Leven; 2008. Report No.: KvL/P & Z 2008.126.

13. Laurent de Angulo MS, Brouwers-de Jong EA, Bijlsma-Schlösser JFM, Bulk-Bunschoten AMW, Pauwels JH, Steinbuch-Linstra L. Development research in youth health care: the Van Wiechen Motor Test and the Baecke-Fassaert Motor Test [Ontwikkelingsonderzoek in de Jeugdgezondheidszorg: het Van Wiechenonderzoek; de Baecke-Fassaert Motoriektest]. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum; 2005.

14. Baecke JAH, Boersma-Slütter WGM, van Heeswijk ALM. Ontwikkeling van een motoriektest voor kleuters: de betrouwbaarheid. Tijdschr Voor Soc Gezondheidszorg. 1984;62: 38–45.

15. van Gelder W, Stroes H. Leerlingvolgsysteem Bewegen en Spelen. Over observeren, registeren en extra zorg [Pupil tracking system Moving and Playing. About observing, registering, and extra care]. 2nd ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2010.

16. Stimuliz. Handleiding 4-Vaardighedenscan | Stimuliz Help Centrum [Manual 4-Skills Scan | Stimuliz Help Centre]. In: Stimuliz. Handleiding 4-Vaardighedenscan | Stimuliz Help Centrum [Manual 4-Skills Scan | Stimuliz Help Centre] [Internet]. 2017 [cited 27 Sep 2017]. Available: http://support.stimuliz.nl/handleiding-4-s-en-testen

17. van Kernebeek WG, de Schipper AW, Savelsbergh GJP, Toussaint HM. Inter-rater and test–retest (between-sessions) reliability of the 4-Skills Scan for Dutch elementary school children. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2018;22: 129–137. doi: 10.1080/1091367X.2017.1399891

18. van Kernebeek WG, de Kroon MLA, Savelsbergh GJP, Toussaint HM. The validity of the 4-Skills Scan A double-validation study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018;28: 2349–2357. doi: 10.1111/sms.13231 29858501

19. Vaivre-Douret L. Developmental Coordination Disorders: State of art. Neurophysiol Clin Neurophysiol. 2014;44: 13–23. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2013.10.133 24502901

20. Zwicker JG, Missiuna C, Harris SR, Boyd LA. Developmental coordination disorder: A review and update. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2012;16: 573–581. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2012.05.005 22705270

21. Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett AL. Movement Assessment Battery for Children. Kent, UK: The Psychological Corporation; 1992.

22. van Waelvelde H, Peersman W, Lenoir M, Smits-Engelsman BCM. Convergent validity between two motor tests: Movement-ABC and PDMS-2. Adapt Phys Act Q. 2007;24: 59–69.

23. van Waelvelde H, Peersman W, Lenoir M, Smits-Engelsman BCM. The reliability of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children for preschool children with mild to moderate motor impairment. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21: 465–470. doi: 10.1177/0269215507074052 17613568

24. Smits-Engelsman BCM, Fiers MJ, Henderson SE, Henderson L. Interrater reliability of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children. Phys Ther. 2008;88: 286–294. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070068 18073266

25. Schoemaker MM, Flapper BCT, Reinders-Messelink HA, Kloet A de. Validity of the motor observation questionnaire for teachers as a screening instrument for children at risk for developmental coordination disorder. Hum Mov Sci. 2008;27: 190–199. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2008.02.003 18346804

26. Ferreira L, Godinez I, Gabbard C, Vieira JLL, Caçola P. Motor development in school-age children is associated with the home environment including socioeconomic status. Child Care Health Dev. 2018;44: 801–806. doi: 10.1111/cch.12606 30066336

27. Municipality of Amsterdam. Districts in figures [Gemeente Amsterdam. Stadsdelen in cijfers]. Available: https://www.ois.amsterdam.nl/publicaties/stadsdelen-in-cijfers/?50104

28. Obuchowski NA. Computing sample size for receiver operating characteristic studies. Invest Radiol. 1994;29: 238–243. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199402000-00020 8169102

29. Dijkmans-Scheepstra D, Rietveld E. De constructvaliditeit van de Baecke-Fassaert Motoriektest en de Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 Nederlandstalige versie. Masterthesis Transfergroep Rotterdam. 2013.

30. Sugden DA. Dutch Consensus statement DCD. DCD Netwerk Nederland; 2011. Report No.: DCD-UK-NL.

31. Smits-Engelsman BCM. Movement ABC: Nederlandse handleiding. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets en Zeitlinger; 1998.

32. Seeberger LC. Cerebellar Tremor-Definition and Treatment. Movement disorders The Colorado Neurological Institute Review. Colorado: Colorado Neurological Institute; 2005.

33. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New Jersey, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.

34. Fluss R, Faraggi D, Reiser B. Estimation of the Youden Index and its Associated Cutoff Point. Biom J. 2005;47: 458–472. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200410135 16161804

35. American Psychological Association. Standards for Educational & Psychological Tests. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2014.

36. Social and Cultural Planning Office (SCP). Socioeconomic status score. [cited 16 Apr 2019]. Available: https://www.scp.nl/Onderzoek/Lopend_onderzoek/A_Z_alle_lopende_onderzoeken/Statusscores

37. Cools W, De Martelaer K, Vandaele B, Samaey C, Andries C. Assessment of movement skill performance in preschool children: Convergent validity between MOT 4–6 and M-ABC. J Sports Sci Med. 2010;9: 597–604. 24149786

38. Fransen J, D’Hondt E, Bourgois J, Vaeyens R, Philippaerts RM, Lenoir M. Motor competence assessment in children: Convergent and discriminant validity between the BOT-2 Short Form and KTK testing batteries. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35: 1375–1383. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.03.011 24713517

39. Venetsanou F, Kambas A, Ellinoudis T, Fatouros I, Giannakidou D, Kourtessis T. Can the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Test be the “gold standard” for the motor assessment of children with Developmental Coordination Disorder? Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32: 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.09.006 20940096

40. Brown T, Lalor A. The Movement Assessment Battery for Children—second edition (MABC-2): A review and critique. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2009;29: 86–103. doi: 10.1080/01942630802574908 19197761

41. Smits-Engelsman BC, Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett AL. Movement Assessment Battery for Children, second edition, manual, Nederlandse bewerking. The Netherlands, Amsterdam, Pearson Assessment and Information B.V.; 2010.

42. Van Waelvelde H, De Weerdt W, De Cock P, Smits-Engelsman BCM. Aspects of the validity of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children. Hum Mov Sci. 2004;23: 49–60. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2004.04.004 15201041

43. Golding J, Emmett P, Iles-Caven Y, Steer C, Lingam R. A review of environmental contributions to childhood motor skills. J Child Neurol. 2014;29: 1531–1547. doi: 10.1177/0883073813507483 24170258

44. Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett AL. Movement Assessment Battery for Children—second edition [Movement ABC-2]. London: The Psychological Corporation; 2007.