Are primary school children attending full-day school still engaged in sports clubs?

English version

Autoři: Sarah Spengler ^aff001; Arvid Kuritz ^aff002; Matthias Rabel ^aff001; Filip Mess ^aff001
Působiště autorů: Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany ^aff001; Department of Sports Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany ^aff002
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(11)
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225220

Souhrn

Purpose

Schools and organized sports both offer great chances to promote physical activity among children. Full-day schools particularly allow for extensive participation in extra-curricular physical activities. However, due to time reasons, full-day schools may also prevent children from engagement in organized sports outside school. There is only little national and international research addressing the possible competition of full-day schools and providers of organized sports outside school and the potential effects on children’s physical activity behavior. In Germany’s educational system, a transformation towards more full-day schools is currently taking place. The existence of both, half-day and full-day schools, gave occasion to the following research question: Do students attending half-day and full-day school differ with respect to a) sports club membership rate and b) weekly amount of sports club training?

Methods

Data were collected in eleven German primary schools. Selected schools offered both half-day and full-day (minimum three days/week with at least seven hours) care. 372 students’ data (grades 1–4; N = 153 half-day, N = 219 full-day; 47.4% male, 8.8±1.2y) were eligible for analyses. We assessed sports club membership and weekly training duration via questionnaire. Statistical analyses included Chi-square and Mann-Whitney-U-Tests.

Results

83% of half-day school students and 67% of full-day school students were sports club members (χ²(1) = 12.31, p<.001). Weekly duration of training in sports clubs among sports club members (N = 266) also differed between the groups (mdn = 150 min in half-day, mdn = 120 min in full-day school students; z = -2.37, p = .018). Additional analyses stratified for age and gender showed similar results.

Conclusion

Primary school students attending full-day schools engage less in organized sports outside school than half-day school students, regardless of age and gender. Future studies should examine if the detected lower engagement in sports club physical activity is compensated by physical activities in other settings such as school or non-organized leisure time.

Klíčová slova:

Physical activity – Behavior – Schools – Age groups – Children – Germany – Sports – Adolescents

Zdroje

1. Poitras VJ, Gray CE, Borghese MM, Carson V, Chaput JP, Janssen I, et al. Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(6 Suppl 3): 197–239. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0663 27306431

2. Janssen I, Leblanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7: 40. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-40 20459784

3. Craigie AM, Lake AA, Kelly SA, Adamson AJ, Mathers JC. Tracking of obesity-related behaviours from childhood to adulthood: a systematic review. Maturitas. 2011;70(3): 266–84. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.08.005 21920682

4. Trudeau F, Laurencelle L, Shephard RJ. Tracking of physical activity from childhood to adulthood. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(11): 1937–43. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000145525.29140.3b 15514510

5. World Health Organisation. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2010.

6. Rütten A, Pfeifer K. Nationale Empfehlungen für Bewegung und Bewegungsförderung. Köln: Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung; 2017. German.

7. Kamette F. Organisation of school time in the European Union. European Issues. 2011; 212. https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/doc/questions-d-europe/qe-212-en.pdf.

8. Naul R. Bewegung, Spiel und Sport in der Ganztagsschule: Bilanz und Perspektiven. Aachen: Meyer & Meyer; 2011. German.

9. Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Allgemeinbildende Schulen in Ganztagsform in den Ländern in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Statistik 2012 bis 2016. Berlin; 2018. https://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/Dateien/pdf/Statistik/Dokumentationen/GTS_2016_Bericht.pdf. German.

10. Klemm K, Zorn D. Gute Ganztagsschule für alle. Kosten für den Ausbau eines qualitätsvollen Ganztagsschulsystems in Deutschland bis 2030. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung; 2017. https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/Projekte/27_In_Vielfalt_besser_lernen/Gute_Ganztagsschule_01.pdf. German.

11. German Government. Ein neuer Aufbruch für Europa. Eine neue Dynamik für Deutschland. Ein neuer Zusammenhalt für unser Land. Koalitionsvertrag zwischen CDU, CSU und SPD. Berlin; 2018. https://www.cdu.de/system/tdf/media/dokumente/koalitionsvertrag_2018.pdf?file=1. German.

12. Holtappels HG. Angebotsstruktur, Schülerteilnahme und Ausbaugrad ganztägiger Schulen. In: Holtappels HG, Klieme E, Rauschenbach T, Stecher L, editors. Ganztagsschule in Deutschland. Ergebnisse der Ausgangserhebung der „Studie zur Entwicklung von Ganztagsschulen”(StEG). Weinheim, München: Beltz Juventa; 2007. pp. 186–206. German.

13. Thieme L. Ganztag und Sportvereine. Empirische Befunde aus Rheinland-Pfalz. sportunterricht. 2013;62(5): 142–6. German.

14. Süßenbach J, Geis S. Evaluation von Bewegungs-, Spiel- und Sportangeboten an offenen Ganztagsschulen in Niedersachsen. Hannover: Landessportbund Niedersachsen; 2013. German.

15. Breuer C, Feiler S, Wicker P. Sport clubs in Germany. In: Breuer C, Hoekman R, Nagel S, van der Werff H, editors. Sport clubs in Europe. Cham: Springer; 2015. pp. 187–208.

16. Walk L. Bewegung formt das Hirn: lernrelevante Erkenntnisse der Gehirnforschung. DIE Zeitschrift für Erwachsenenbildung. 2011;1: 27–9. doi: 10.3278/DIE1101W027 German.

17. Field SC, Temple VA. The relationship between fundamental motor skill proficiency and participation in organized sports and active recreation in middle childhood. Sports. 2017;5(2). doi: 10.3390/sports5020043 29910403

18. Howie EK, McVeigh JA, Smith AJ, Straker LM. Organized sport trajectories from childhood to adolescence and health associations. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(7): 1331–9. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000894 27314410

19. Kokko S, Martin L, Geidne S, Van Hoye A, Lane A, Meganck J, et al. Does sports club participation contribute to physical activity among children and adolescents? A comparison across six European countries. Scand J Public Health. 2018. doi: 10.1177/1403494818786110 29999480

20. Petry K, Hallmann K. Germany. In: Hallmann K, Petry K, editors. Comparative sport development. New York: Springer; 2013. pp. 75–86.

21. Krimmer H, Priemer J. ZiviZ-Survey 2012. Zivilgesellschaft verstehen. Berlin: Stifterverband für die Deutsche Wissenschaft; 2013. German.

22. Breuer C, Wicker P, Feiler S. Empirische Analysen zur Entwicklung der Strukturen in Sportvereinen. In: Rütten A, Nagel S, Kähler R, editors. Handbuch Sportentwicklungsplanung. Schorndorf: Hofmann; 2014. pp. 225–34. German.

23. Heinemann K. Einführung in die Soziologie des Sports. 5th ed. Schorndorf: Hofmann; 2007. German.

24. Heinemann K, Horch HD. Soziologie der Sportorganisation. Ger J Exerc Sport Res. 1981;11(2): 123–50. German.

25. Wolfert S, Pupeter M. Freizeit: Hobbys und Mediennutzung. In: World Vision Deutschland, editor. Kinder in Deutschland 2018. 4 World Vision Kinderstudie. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz; 2018. pp. 54–75. German.

26. Breuer C. Sportentwicklungsbericht 2013/2014: Analyse zur Situation der Sportvereine in Deutschland. Hellenthal: Strauß; 2015. German.

27. Schmidt SCE, Henn A, Albrecht C, Woll A. Physical activity of german children and adolescents 2003–2012: The MoMo-Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(11). doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111375 29137127

28. Brettschneider W-D, Kleine T, Brandl-Bredenbeck HP. Jugendarbeit in Sportvereinen. Anspruch und Wirklichkeit: eine Evaluationsstudie. Schorndorf: Hofmann; 2002. German.

29. Vella SA, Cliff DP, Okely AD. Socio-ecological predictors of participation and dropout in organised sports during childhood. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11: 62. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-62 24885978

30. Silva P, Santos R, Welk G, Mota J. Seasonal differences in physical activity and sedentary patterns: The relevance of the PA context. J Sports Sci Med. 2011;10(1): 66–72. 24149297

31. Brooke HL, Atkin AJ, Corder K, Ekelund U, van Sluijs EM. Changes in time-segment specific physical activity between ages 10 and 14 years: A longitudinal observational study. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19(1): 29–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.10.003 25459234

32. Brooke HL, Atkin AJ, Corder K, Brage S, van Sluijs EM. Frequency and duration of physical activity bouts in school-aged children: A comparison within and between days. Prev Med Rep. 2016;4: 585–90. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.10.007 27843758

33. Jauregui A, Villalpando S, Rangel-Baltazar E, Castro-Hernandez J, Lara-Zamudio Y, Mendez-Gomez-Humaran I. The physical activity level of Mexican children decreases upon entry to elementary school. Salud Publica Mex. 2011;53(3): 228–36. 21829888

34. Aznar S, Naylor PJ, Silva P, Perez M, Angulo T, Laguna M, et al. Patterns of physical activity in Spanish children: a descriptive pilot study. Child Care Health Dev. 2011;37(3): 322–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2010.01175.x 21083695

35. Pau M, Corona F, Leban B, Piredda S, Vacca MM, Mura G. Influence of school schedules on physical activity patterns in primary school children: A case study in Italy. J Phys Act Health. 2017;14(7): 501–5. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2016-0492 28290766

36. Züchner I, Arnoldt B. Sport von Kindern und Jugendlichen in Ganztagsschule und Sportverein. Sportpädagogik Heute. 2012;3: 1–14. German.

37. Heim C, Prohl R, Bob A. Ganztagsschule und Sportverein. In: Hildebrandt-Stramann R, Laging R, Moegling K, editors. Körper, Bewegung und Schule. Theorie, Forschung und Diskussion. Kassel: Prolog; 2013. pp. 136–56. German.

38. Schmidt S, Will N, Henn A, Reimers A, Woll A. Der Motorik-Modul Aktivitätsfragebogen MoMo-AFB: Leitfaden zur Anwendung und Auswertung. KIT Scientific Working Papers. 2016; 53. https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000062199. German.

39. Jekauc D, Wagner MO, Kahlert D, Woll A. Reliabilität und Validität des MoMo-Aktivitätsfragebogens für Jugendliche (MoMo-AFB). Diagnostica. 2013;59(2): 100–11. German.

40. Baur J, Burrmann U, Krysmanski K. Sportbezogene Sozialisation von Mädchen. In: Bundesinstitut für Sportwissenschaft, editor. BISp-Jahrbuch 2001. Köln; 2002. pp. 219–26. https://www.bisp.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/Publikationen/Jahrbuch/Jb_2001_Artikel/Baur_etal.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1. German.

41. Berger M, Boockmann B, Felbermayr G, Klempt C, Koch A, Kohler WK, et al. Strukturanalyse und Perspektiven des Wirtschaftsstandortes Baden-Württemberg im nationalen und internationalen Vergleich. Abschlussbericht. ZEW-Gutachten und Forschungsberichte. 2017. https://wm.baden-wuerttemberg.de/fileadmin/redaktion/m-wm/intern/Publikationen/Wirtschaftsstandort/Studien/Abschlussbericht_Strukturanalyse_final.pdf. German.

42. Mess F, Alexander W. Soziale Ungleichheit im Kindes- und Jugendalter am Beispiel des Sportengagements in Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation. 2012;32(4): 359–79. German.

43. Manz K, Schlack R, Poethko-Muller C, Mensink G, Finger J, Lampert T, et al. Körperlich-sportliche Aktivität und Nutzung elektronischer Medien im Kindes- und Jugendalter. Ergebnisse der KiGGS-Studie: Erste Folgebefragung (KiGGS Welle 1). Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz. 2014;57(7): 840–8. German.

44. Kalman M, Geckova AM, Hamrik Z, Kopcakova J, Iannotti RJ, Veselska ZD. Motives for physical activity among adolescents in the Czech and Slovak Republics. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2015;23 (Suppl): 78–82. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a4176 26849549

45. Kuritz A, Dinkelacker M, Mess F. Bewegung und Sport in Ganztagsschulen—eine systematische Literaturübersicht zum aktuellen Forschungsstand in Deutschland. Sportwissenschaft. 2016;46(3): 162–78. German.

46. Møller NC, Tarp J, Kamelarczyk EF, Brønd JC, Klakk H, Wedderkopp N. Do extra compulsory physical education lessons mean more physically active children? Findings from the childhood health, activity, and motor performance school study Denmark (The CHAMPS-study DK). Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11(1): 121.

47. Marques A, Ekelund U, Sardinha LB. Associations between organized sports participation and objectively measured physical activity, sedentary time and weight status in youth. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19(2): 154–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.02.007 25766508

48. Züchner I. Jugendalltag zwischen Ganztagsschule, Peers und außerschulischen Aktivitäten. In: Bock K, Grabowsky S., Sander U., Thole W., editors. Jugend Hilfe Forschung. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider; 2013. pp. 45–65. German.

49. Mota J, Silva P, Santos MP, Ribeiro JC, Oliveira J, Duarte JA. Physical activity and school recess time: differences between the sexes and the relationship between children’s playground physical activity and habitual physical activity. J Sports Sci. 2005;23(3): 269–75. doi: 10.1080/02640410410001730124 15966345

50. Guinhouya BC, Lemdani M, Vilhelm C, Hubert H, Apete GK, Durocher A. How school time physical activity is the "big one" for daily activity among schoolchildren: a semi-experimental approach. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6(4): 510–9. 19842466

51. Marcus J, Nemitz J, Spieß CK. Ausbau der Ganztagsschule: Kinder aus einkommensschwachen Haushalten im Westen nutzen Angebote verstärkt. DIW-Wochenbericht. 2013;80(27): 11–23. German.