Time trends between 2002 and 2017 in correlates of self-reported sitting time in European adults
Autoři:
Judith G. M. Jelsma aff001; Joanne Gale aff002; Anne Loyen aff003; Femke van Nassau aff001; Adrian Bauman aff002; Hidde P. van der Ploeg aff001
Působiště autorů:
Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Van der Boechorststraat, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
aff001; Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
aff002; Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
aff003
Vyšlo v časopise:
PLoS ONE 14(11)
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225228
Souhrn
Background
This study explores trends in the prevalence of high sitting time and its correlates among “high sitting” and “high sitting-least active” European adults from 2002 to 2017. Both groups have merit for future public health interventions to prevent development of a range of prevalent non-communicable diseases.
Methods
Data collected in the 2002 (15 countries), 2005 (30 countries), 2013 (28 countries) and 2017 (28 countries) Eurobarometer surveys were used, including around 15,000 respondents in 2002 and >26,000 respondents in the other years. Sitting time and moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity were measured with the validated International Physical Activity Questionnaire-short. High sitting was defined as >7.5 hours per day. Respondents in the lowest quartile of total reported days of physical activity (i.e. days walking, days in moderate activity, and days in vigorous activity) were defined as least active. Multivariate odds ratios of high sitting, and high sitting-least active were assessed by country and socio-demographic characteristics for each survey year using binary logistic regression analyses.
Results
Trends in sitting time were relatively stable over a 15-year period, although this time trend was limited by a change in the sitting question between 2005 and 2013. Men, higher educated people, students, retired people, white collar workers, people living in urban areas, people with lower physical activity levels, and people living in the Czech Republic, Denmark or the Netherlands were consistently more likely to be in the high sitting group across all four survey years. Similarly, men, students, retired people, unemployed people, white collar workers, and people living in the Czech Republic or Denmark were consistently more likely to be in the high sitting-least active group across all four surveys.
Conclusion
This study identified population sub-groups that need special attention in public health interventions to lower total sitting time.
Klíčová slova:
Europe – Public and occupational health – Physical activity – Behavior – Surveys – European Union – Denmark – Ireland
Zdroje
1. Sedentary Behaviour Research Network. Letter to the editor: standardized use of the terms "sedentary" and "sedentary behaviours". Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012;37(3):540–2. Epub 2012/05/01. doi: 10.1139/h2012-024 22540258.
2. Bauman A, Chau J, Ding D, Bennie J. Too Much Sitting and Cardio-Metabolic Risk: An Update of Epidemiological Evidence. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2013;(7):293–8. doi: 10.1007/s12170-013-0316-y
3. Wilmot EG, Edwardson CL, Achana FA, Davies MJ, Gorely T, Gray LJ, et al. Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2012;55(11):2895–905. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2677-z 22890825.
4. Proper KI, Singh AS, van Mechelen W, Chinapaw MJ. Sedentary behaviors and health outcomes among adults: a systematic review of prospective studies. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(2):174–82. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.015 21238866.
5. Grontved A, Hu FB. Television viewing and risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;305(23):2448–55. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.812 21673296; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4324728.
6. van Uffelen JG, Wong J, Chau JY, van der Ploeg HP, Riphagen I, Gilson ND, et al. Occupational sitting and health risks: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39(4):379–88. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.05.024 20837291.
7. Chau JY, Grunseit AC, Chey T, Stamatakis E, Brown WJ, Matthews CE, et al. Daily sitting time and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80000. Epub 2013/11/16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080000 24236168; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3827429.
8. Biswas A, Oh PI, Faulkner GE, Bajaj RR, Silver MA, Mitchell MS, et al. Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(2):123–32. Epub 2015/01/20. doi: 10.7326/M14-1651 25599350.
9. Ekelund U, Steene-Johannessen J, Brown WJ, Fagerland MW, Owen N, Powell KE, et al. Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1302–10. Epub 2016/08/01. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30370-1 27475271.
10. UK Physical Activity Guidelines. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-physical-activity-guidelines.
11. Dutch physical activity guidelines 2017. Available from: https://www.gezondheidsraad.nl/en/task-and-procedure/areas-of-activity/preventie/dutch-physical-activity-guidelines-2017.
12. Australia's physical activity and sedentary behaviour guidelines. Available from: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/health-pubhlth-strateg-phys-act-guidelines.
13. Committee PAGA. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. Washington, DC: U.S: Department of Health and Human Services, 2018.
14. European Commision. Eurobarometer survey [internet]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm.
15. Milton K, Gale J, Stamatakis E, Bauman A. Trends in prolonged sitting time among European adults: 27 country analysis. Prev Med. 2015;77:11–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.016 25937588.
16. Bennie JA, Chau JY, van der Ploeg HP, Stamatakis E, Do A, Bauman A. The prevalence and correlates of sitting in European adults—a comparison of 32 Eurobarometer-participating countries. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10:107. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-107 24020702; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3847463.
17. Loyen A, van der Ploeg HP, Bauman A, Brug J, Lakerveld J. European sitting championship: prevalence and correlates of self-reported sitting time in the 28 European Union member states. PloS one. 2016;11(3):e0149320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149320 26934701
18. European Commision. Special Eurobarometer 472/Wave 88.4—Sport and Physical Activity: TNS Opinion & Social; 2018.
19. European Commision. Special Eurobarometer 412/Wave 80.2—Sport and Physical Activity: TNS Opinion & Social; 2013.
20. Commision European. Eurobarometer Wave 64.3—Foreign Languages, Biotechnology, Organized Crime, and Health Items: TNS Opinion & Social; 2006.
21. European Commision. Special Eurobarometer 183-6/Wave 58.2—Physical Activity: European Opinion Research Group; 2003.
22. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381–95. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB 12900694.
23. Rosenberg DE, Bull FC, Marshall AL, Sallis JF, Bauman AE. Assessment of sedentary behavior with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. J Phys Act Health. 2008;5 Suppl 1:S30–44. 18364524.
24. The IPAQ group. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) [Internet]. Available from: https://sites.google.com/site/theipaq/.
25. Milton K, Clemes S, Bull F. Can a single question provide an accurate measure of physical activity? Brit J Sport Med. 2013;47(1):44–8. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2011-090899 WOS:000313762100013. 22522584
26. Milton K, Bull FC, Bauman A. Reliability and validity testing of a single-item physical activity measure. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(3):203–8. Epub 2010/05/21. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.068395 20484314.
27. United Nations. Standard Country or Area Codes for Statistics Use, 1999 (Revision 4) 1999. Available from: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/.
28. Prince SA, Reed JL, McFetridge C, Tremblay MS, Reid RD. Correlates of sedentary behaviour in adults: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2017;18(8):915–35. doi: 10.1111/obr.12529 WOS:000404900600007. 28524615
29. Rhodes RE, Mark R, Temmel C. Correlates of Adult Sedentary Behaviour: A Systematic Review. Ann Behav Med. 2012;43:S273–S. WOS:000302092401151.
30. O'Donoghue G, Perchoux C, Mensah K, Lakerveld J, van der Ploeg H, Bernaards C, et al. A systematic review of correlates of sedentary behaviour in adults aged 18–65 years: a socio-ecological approach. Bmc Public Health. 2016;16. ARTN 163 doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2841-3 WOS:000370409500001. 26887323
31. van der Ploeg HP, Moller SV, Hannerz H, van der Beek AJ, Holtermann A. Temporal changes in occupational sitting time in the Danish workforce and associations with all-cause mortality: results from the Danish work environment cohort study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:71. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0233-1 26031453; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4453049.
32. van der Ploeg HP, Venugopal K, Chau JY, van Poppel MN, Breedveld K, Merom D, et al. Non-occupational sedentary behaviors: population changes in The Netherlands, 1975–2005. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44(4):382–7. Epub 2013/03/19. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.11.034 23498104.
33. Shrestha N, Kukkonen-Harjula KT, Verbeek JH, Ijaz S, Hermans V, Pedisic Z. Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work. Cochrane Db Syst Rev. 2018;(6). ARTN CD010912 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub4. WOS:000436781300036.
34. Martin A, Fitzsimons C, Jepson R, Saunders DH, van der Ploeg HP, Teixeira PJ, et al. Interventions with potential to reduce sedentary time in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(16):1056–63. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094524 25907181.
35. van der Ploeg HP, Hillsdon M. Is sedentary behaviour just physical inactivity by another name? Int J Behav Nutr Phy. 2017;14. ARTN 142 doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0601-0 WOS:000413469100002. 29058587
36. Stamatakis E, Ekelund U, Ding D, Hamer M, Bauman AE, Lee IM. Is the time right for quantitative public health guidelines on sitting? A narrative review of sedentary behaviour research paradigms and findings. Brit J Sport Med. 2019;53(6):377–+. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099131 WOS:000469494300020. 29891615
37. Peachey MM, Richardson J, A VT, Dal-Bello Haas V, Gravesande J. Environmental, behavioural and multicomponent interventions to reduce adults' sitting time: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2018. Epub 2018/10/26. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098968 30352864.
38. Ng MK, Yousuf B, Bigelow PL, Van Eerd D. Effectiveness of health promotion programmes for truck drivers: A systematic review. Health Educ J. 2015;74(3):270–86. doi: 10.1177/0017896914533953 WOS:000353039100002.
39. Baxter S, Johnson M, Payne N, Buckley-Woods H, Blank L, Hock E, et al. Promoting and maintaining physical activity in the transition to retirement: a systematic review of interventions for adults around retirement age. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016;13:12. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0336-3 26830026; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4735960.
40. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U, et al. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):247–57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60646-1 WOS:000306609200034. 22818937
41. Healy GN, Clark BK, Winkler EA, Gardiner PA, Brown WJ, Matthews CE. Measurement of adults' sedentary time in population-based studies. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(2):216–27. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.05.005 21767730; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3179387.
42. Clemes SA, David BM, Zhao Y, Han X, Brown W. Validity of two self-report measures of sitting time. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9(4):533–9. 21946087.
Článok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 11
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Nejasný stín na plicích – kazuistika
- Masturbační chování žen v ČR − dotazníková studie
- Úspěšná resuscitativní thorakotomie v přednemocniční neodkladné péči
- Dlouhodobá recidiva a komplikace spojené s elektivní operací břišní kýly
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- A daily diary study on maladaptive daydreaming, mind wandering, and sleep disturbances: Examining within-person and between-persons relations
- A 3’ UTR SNP rs885863, a cis-eQTL for the circadian gene VIPR2 and lincRNA 689, is associated with opioid addiction
- A substitution mutation in a conserved domain of mammalian acetate-dependent acetyl CoA synthetase 2 results in destabilized protein and impaired HIF-2 signaling
- Molecular validation of clinical Pantoea isolates identified by MALDI-TOF