Retrospective comparative analysis of intraocular lens calculation formulas after hyperopic refractive surgery
Autoři:
Anibal Francone aff001; Nicole Lemanski aff002; Martin Charles aff001; Sheila Borboli-Gerogiannis aff002; Sherleen Chen aff002; Marie-Claude Robert aff002; Roberto Pineda, II aff002
Působiště autorů:
Centro Oftalmológico Dr. Charles Sociedad Anónima, Buenos Aires, Argentina
aff001; Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
aff002
Vyšlo v časopise:
PLoS ONE 14(11)
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224981
Souhrn
Purpose
To compare the intraocular lens calculation formulas and evaluate postoperative refractive results of patients with previous hyperopic corneal refractive surgery.
Design
Retrospective, comparative, observational study.
Setting
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Methods
Clinical charts and optical biometric data of 39 eyes from 24 consecutive patients diagnosed with previous hyperopic laser vision correction and cataract surgery were reviewed and analyzed. The Intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation using the Holladay 2 formula (Lenstar) and the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) Post-Refractive IOL Calculator (version 4.9, 2017) were compared to the actual manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) following cataract surgery. No pre-Lasik / PRK or post-Lasik / PRK information was used in any of the calculations. The IOL prediction error, the mean IOL prediction error, the median absolute refractive prediction error, and the percentages of eyes within ±0.50 diopter (D) and ±1.00 D of the predicted refraction were calculated.
Results
The Holladay 2 formula produced a mean arithmetic IOL prediction error significantly different from zero (P = 0.003). Surprisingly, the mean arithmetic IOL prediction errors generated by Shammas, Haigis-L and Barret True K No History formulas were not significantly different from zero (P = 0.14, P = 0.49, P = 0.81, respectively).There were no significant differences in the median absolute refractive prediction error or percentage of eyes within ± 0.50 D or ± 1.00 D of the predicted refraction between formulas or methods.
Conclusion
In eyes with previous hyperopic LASIK/PRK and no prior data, there were no significant differences in the accuracy of IOL power calculation between the Holladay 2 formula and the ASCRS Post-refractive IOL calculator.
Klíčová slova:
Eyes – Cornea – Cataract surgery – Eye lens – Arithmetic – Photorefractive keratectomy – Refractive surgery – LASIK
Zdroje
1. Davidson RS, Dhaliwal D, Hamilton DR, Jackson M, Patterson L, Stonecipher K, et al. Surgical correction of presbyopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(6):920–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.05.003 27373400
2. Krueger RR, Rabinowitz YS, Binder PS. The 25th anniversary of excimer lasers in refractive surgery: historical review. J Refract Surg Thorofare NJ 1995. 2010 Oct;26(10):749–60.
3. Alió JL, Soria F, Abbouda A, Peña-García P. Laser in situ keratomileusis for -6.00 to -18.00 diopters of myopia and up to -5.00 diopters of astigmatism: 15-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Jan;41(1):33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.08.029 25465210
4. Varley GA, Huang D, Rapuano CJ, Schallhorn S, Boxer Wachler BS, Sugar A LASIK for hyperopia, hyperopic astigmatism, and mixed astigmatism: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmic Technology Assessment Committee Refractive Surgery Panel, American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2004 Aug; 111(8):1604–1617. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.05.016 15288995
5. Sher NA Hyperopic refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2001 Aug; 12(4):304–8. doi: 10.1097/00055735-200108000-00011 11507345
6. Hamilton DR, Hardten DR. Cataract surgery in patients with prior refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2003 Feb;14(1):44–53. doi: 10.1097/00055735-200302000-00008 12544810
7. Haigis W. Intraocular lens calculation after refractive surgery for myopia: Haigis-L formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Oct;34(10):1658–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.06.029 18812114
8. Haigis W, Goes FJ. IOL Calculation after Refractive Laser Surgery for Hyperopia. In: Goes FJ, ed, Lens Surgery After Previous Refractive Surgery. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers; 2011. p. 55–9.
9. Wang L, Jackson DW, Koch DD. Methods of estimating corneal refractive power after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Jun;28(6):954–61 doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01318-4 12036636
10. Rosa N, Capasso L, Lanza M, Romano A. Axial eye length evaluation before and after myopic photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg Thorofare NJ 1995. 2005 Jun;21(3):281–7.
11. Nawa Y, Yamashita J, Tomita M. Decreased anterior chamber depth after myopic LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 May;36(5):873–874; author reply 874. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.03.015 20457395
12. Awwad ST, Kelley PS, Bowman RW, Cavanagh HD, McCulley JP. Corneal refractive power estimation and intraocular lens calculation after hyperopic LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2009 Mar;116(3):393–400.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.045 19264214
13. Fyodorov SN, Galin MA, Linksz A. Calculation of the optical power of intraocular lenses. Invest Ophthalmol. 1975 Aug;14(8):625–8. 1150402
14. Norrby S. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Mar;34(3):368–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.10.031 18299059
15. Mahdavi S, Holladay J. IOLMaster 500 and integration of the Holladay2 Formula for intraocular lens calculations. Eur Ophthalmic Rev. 2011;5(2):134–135.
16. Narváez J, Zimmerman G, Stulting RD, Chang DH. Accuracy of intraocular lens power prediction using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and SRK/T formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Dec;32(12):2050–3. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.09.009 17137982
17. Trivedi RH, Wilson ME, Reardon W. Accuracy of the Holladay 2 intraocular lens formula for pediatric eyes in the absence of preoperative refraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jul;37(7):1239–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.01.021 21549558
18. Bang S, Edell E, Yu Q, Pratzer K, Stark W. Accuracy of intraocular lens calculations using the IOLMaster in eyes with long axial length and a comparison of various formulas. Ophthalmology. 2011 Mar;118(3):503–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.008 20884057
19. Ghanem AA, El-Sayed HM. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation in high myopia. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2010;3(3):126–30. doi: 10.4103/0974-620X.71888 21120048
20. Optimized IOL constants for the Haag-Streit Lenstar 900 [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2017 Aug 28]. Available from: http://ocusoft.de/ulib/hs/const/lsc1-new.php
21. Shammas HJ, Shammas MC, Hill WE. Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with previous hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 May;39(5):739–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.11.031 23608568
22. Haigis W., Goes F. IOL calculation after laser refractive surgery for hyperopia with current measurements. XXVI Congr Eur Soc Cataract Refract Surg ESCRS. Berlin, Sep 13–17, 2008.
23. Barrett GD. Intraocular lens calculation formulas for new intraocular lens implants. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1987 Jul;13(4):389–96. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(87)80037-8 3625516
24. Barrett GD. An improved universal theoretical formula for intraocular lens power prediction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993 Nov;19(6):713–20. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80339-2 8271166
25. Wang L, Hill WE, Koch DD. Evaluation of intraocular lens power prediction methods using the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons Post-Keratorefractive Intraocular Lens Power Calculator. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Sep;36(9):1466–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.03.044 20692556
26. Williams A, Sloan FA, Lee PP. Longitudinal Rates of Cataract Surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124(9):1308–1314. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.9.1308 16966626
27. Feiz V, Mannis MJ, Garcia-Ferrer F, Kandavel G, Darlington JK, Kim E, et al. Intraocular lens power calculation after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and hyperopia: a standardized approach. Cornea. 2001 Nov;20(8):792–7. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200111000-00003 11685053
28. Hugger P, Kohnen T, La Rosa FA, Holladay JT, Koch DD. Comparison of changes in manifest refraction and corneal power after photorefractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000 Jan;129(1):68–75. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00268-8 10653415
29. Hamed AM, Wang L, Misra M, Koch DD. A comparative analysis of five methods of determining corneal refractive power in eyes that have undergone myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 2002 Apr;109(4):651–8. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)01001-6 11927420
30. Fam HB, Lim KL. A comparative analysis of intraocular lens power calculation methods after myopic excimer laser surgery. J Refract Surg. 2008 Apr;24(4):355–60. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20080401-07 18500084
31. McCarthy M, Gavanski GM, Paton KE, Holland SP. Intraocular lens power calculations after myopic laser refractive surgery: a comparison of methods in 173 eyes. Ophthalmology. 2011 May;118(5):940–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.048 21131054
32. Wu Y, Liu S, Liao R. Prediction accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation methods after laser refractive surgery. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr 8;17(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0439-x 28390411
33. Wang L, Tang M, Huang D, Weikert MP, Koch DD. Comparison of Newer Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Methods for Eyes after Corneal Refractive Surgery. Ophthalmology. 2015 Dec;122(12):2443–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.08.037 26459996
34. Hamill EB, Wang L, Chopra HK, Hill W, Koch DD. Intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with previous hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Feb;43(2):189–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.11.041 28366365
35. Chokshi AR, Latkany RA, Speaker MG, Yu G. Intraocular lens calculations after hyperopic refractive surgery. Ophthalmology. 2007 Nov;114(11):2044–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.019 17459483
36. Tang M, Wang L, Koch DD, Li Y, Huang D. Intraocular lens power calculation after myopic and hyperopic laser vision correction using optical coherence tomography. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;26(1):19–24. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2011.10.004 23960964
37. Gale RP, Saldana M, Johnston RL, Zuberbuhler B, McKibbin M. Benchmark standards for refractive outcomes after NHS cataract surgery. Eye Lond Engl. 2009 Jan;23(1):149–52.
38. Behndig A, Montan P, Stenevi U, Kugelberg M, Zetterström C, Lundström M. Aiming for emmetropia after cataract surgery: Swedish National Cataract Register study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Jul;38(7):1181–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.02.035 22727287
Článok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 11
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Nejasný stín na plicích – kazuistika
- Masturbační chování žen v ČR − dotazníková studie
- Úspěšná resuscitativní thorakotomie v přednemocniční neodkladné péči
- Dlouhodobá recidiva a komplikace spojené s elektivní operací břišní kýly
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- A daily diary study on maladaptive daydreaming, mind wandering, and sleep disturbances: Examining within-person and between-persons relations
- A 3’ UTR SNP rs885863, a cis-eQTL for the circadian gene VIPR2 and lincRNA 689, is associated with opioid addiction
- A substitution mutation in a conserved domain of mammalian acetate-dependent acetyl CoA synthetase 2 results in destabilized protein and impaired HIF-2 signaling
- Molecular validation of clinical Pantoea isolates identified by MALDI-TOF