#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

First evidence of hepatitis E virus infection in a small mammal (yellow-necked mouse) from Croatia


Authors: Jelena Prpić aff001;  Tomislav Keros aff001;  Marko Vucelja aff002;  Linda Bjedov aff002;  Oktavija Đaković Rode aff003;  Josip Margaletić aff002;  Boris Habrun aff001;  Lorena Jemeršić aff001
Authors place of work: Croatian Veterinary Institute, Zagreb, Croatia aff001;  Forestry Faculty University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia aff002;  University Hospital for Infectious Diseases “Dr. Fran Mihaljević”, Zagreb, Croatia aff003;  University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia aff004
Published in the journal: PLoS ONE 14(11)
Category: Research Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225583

Summary

Since the role of wild rodents/small mammals in hepatitis E virus (HEV) epidemiology has been a subject of considerable debate, this study was conducted to investigate the potential presence of HEV RNA in small rodents collected within their natural habitats and to detect if they can be potential reservoirs of the virus. A total of 483 small rodents were captured using snap traps placed at 11 regions in Croatia. Sampling was undertaken in 2008 and repeated from 2010 to 2014. Liver samples were tested for the presence of HEV RNA. HEV RNA was detected in only one liver sample (0.21%) originated from Apodemus flavicollis from the location Medvednica, nearby Zagreb collected in 2014. According to the sequence analysis, the isolate has shown to be a member of Orthohepevirus A species, genotype HEV-3. The genotyping results confirmed grouping into subtype 3a, general cluster 3abchij.The detected HEV strain showed to be genetically highly related to strains found in humans and/or domestic pigs and wild boars from Croatia. Our finding indicates that wild small mammals could play a role in the epidemiology of HEV-3 infection and therefore should be taken under consideration as potential reservoirs or/and transmitters of the disease. However, further investigation is needed to recognize their potential for maintaining the infection in natural conditions.

Keywords:

Sequence analysis – Mammals – Rodents – Livestock – Swine – Hepatitis E virus – Croatia – Genetic epidemiology

Introduction

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is classified as a member of the family Hepeviridae, genus Orthohepevirus[1, 2]. The genus includes four genotypes: Orthohepevirus A, B, C and D. OrthohepevirusA have been isolated from humans, swine (pigs and wild boars), deer, mongooses, rabbits and camels[1, 2]. Orthohepevirus B have been isolated from birds, Orthohepevirus C from rats, ferrets and minks[1, 2]. Orthohepevirus D includes strains from bats [1, 2]. The largest species, Orthohepevirus A, comprises seven genotypes [1, 2]. Genotypes 1 to 4 HEV (HEV-1 to -4) of Orthohepevirus A are known to cause disease in humans. HEV-1 and HEV-2 infect only humans, causing epidemics in developing countries, while HEV-3 and HEV-4 are zoonotic and can spread from animals to humans [3, 4]. The zoonotic potential of other Orthohepevirus genotypes (B, C, D) derived from various animals remains unclear.

HEV-3 is native and widespread throughout Europe [5], including Croatia [6]. Active infections and high seroprevalence are measured on Croatian pig farms (up to 92%), in wild boar (up to 30%) as well as in humans (up to 15%) [7, 8, 9]. In contrast to other hepatitis viruses, experimental models other than nonhuman primates have been established, such as pigs, sheep and laboratory rats [9, 10]. Identification of anti-HEV antibodies in domestic animals like pigs, sheep and cattle [11], as well as the isolation and characterization of HEV isolates from domestic pigs similar to human HEV [12, 13] confirm that animals can be reservoirs for HEV.

A high prevalence of seropositive rodents in the USA and Asia[1418] provides strong evidence that rodents could be potential reservoirs of HEV [14, 16, 17]. Recently, in Europe and Asia, in several small rodent and insectivore species HEV RNA Orthohepevirus C genotype was also detected [1922]. However, studies conducted on rodents, other than rats, are lacking, so the evaluation of rodents as competent reservoirs of HEV-3 still remains uncertain even though HEV-1 and HEV-3 have experimentally been derived from human liver chimeric mice [23]. Moreover, a successful infection of Mus musculus mouse liver cell culture with HEV-3, supports the hypothesis that rodents may be competent hosts [24].

Continental Europe, including Croatia, has a great wildlife biodiversity, including a wide range of rodent species and other small mammals that have been reported as reservoirs of several clinically important bacterial, protozoan, and viral diseases [17]. Due to its diverse natural habitats and possible wildlife/domestic animals/public interactions, there is a potential for many rodent-borne zoonoses. This study presents the first report of a natural HEV-3 infection of a small rodent.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

A total of 483 small rodents (159 Myodesglareolus, 3 Apodemussylvaticus, 44 Apodemusagrarius, 242 Apodemusflavicollis, 17 Apodemusspp, 14 Microtus agrestis and 4 Microtus arvalis) were captured using snap traps (Mini T-rex Mouse Snap Trap, Bell Laboratories inc.) placed at 11 ecologically diverse mountainous and lowland localities (Medvednica, Gerovo, Plitvice; Maksimir, Dotrščina, Lipovljani, Čazma, Žutica, Draganić, Našice and Požega) in Croatia (Fig 1). Trapping was performed using linear transect method. Sampling was done in 2008 and in the time period from 2010 to 2014 as part of the projects supported by Ministry of Science, Education and Sports (068-1430115-2119, „The forest ecoystems as natural foci of the hantaviruses and leptospira”) and by Croatian Science Foundation (IP-11-2013-4250, “The role of biotic agents on vitality of narrow-leafed ash (Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl.) in Croatian floodplain forests“), designed to assess the distribution of small rodents in diverse forest ecosystems in Croatia [25]. The animals were labelled, weighted, measured, and then aseptically dissected. All rodents were morphologically characterized. Animal experimentation guidelines of the American Society of Mammologists were followed during all animal work [26]. Sampling was done in accordance with good veterinary practice that is fully complied with the Croatian Animal Protection Act (Official Gazette of the Republic of Croatia, No. 102/2017). Croatian legislation is harmonized with the Code of good veterinary practice. (https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/content/federation-veterinarians-europe-code-good-veterinary-practice)(http://www.fve.org/news/publications/pdf/gvp.pdf). The permits for field sampling were in agreement and oversight of the Croatian forests Ltd., Public Institution "National park Plitvice lakes" and Public Institution "Nature park Medvednica". This study did not include any experiments or trials. Collected liver samples were stored at -80°C until further investigation.

Fig. 1. Map of Croatia indicating the regions where the small rodents were trapped.
Map of Croatia indicating the regions where the small rodents were trapped.

Detection of viral RNA

Total RNA was extracted from liver homogenate using MagMAX Pathogen RNA/DNA Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) according to the manufacturer's instruction. Tissue samples (100mg of each) were homogenized by using the FastPrep-24 machine, model 6004–500 (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, California, USA) and lysing matrix A, D, and for tonsils matrix M, with addition of 1ml sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The supernatants were decanted into sterile test tubes and stored at -80°C until further testing. For positive animals additional organ samples were tested (lungs, kidney, spleen, colon, heart and heart transudate). To identify HEV RNA carriers, an one-step quantitative real time RT-PCR protocol [27] for detecting highly conserved fragment within ORF3 (open reading frame 3) was carried out. All positive samples (samples containing HEV RNA detectable in a cycle threshold value lower than 40) were re-tested by a nested RT-PCR protocol [28] for detection of the variable fragment within ORF1. The amplification procedures for ORF1 and ORF3 regions are described by Jemeršić et al. [6]. PCR products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel stained with a fluorescent dye-GelStar (Lonza, Belgium) and visualized by UV transillumination. For positive control sequences of previously detected fragments of HEV RNA genotype 3 were used (derived from positive swine sera submitted to GenBank under accession no. KT583116, grouped into HEV3c subtype, with Ct-value 29). Negative controls were aliquots of ultrapure water.

Sequence analysis

PCR product was purified (Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up system (Promega, USA) and sequenced by Macrogen Inc. (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The sequence of 242 base pairs was submitted to GenBank (accession no. MK456392). Phylogenetic grouping and clustering were based on comparison with sequences retrieved from the GenBank, using algorithm BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Sequences were aligned with ClustalW 1.6 and analyzed using MEGA7 [29], based on published recommendations [2]whereas the trees were generated using the neighbour-joining method applying the Kimura 2-parameter evolutionary model.

Results and discussion

Viral RNA was detected in only one liver sample (0.21%, 1/483) derived from A. flavicollis (yellow-necked mouse) from Medvednica mountain (Zagreb County). The mouse was captured in 2014, near a mountain cottage, a favourite hiking site. Ct-value of the positive rodent liver sample was 31. Other tissues and organs of the positive animal were negative for HEV. The phylogenetic analysis of the partial 242ntORF1 obtained sequence (Fig 2) showed that the HEV sequence derived from A. flavicollis grouped into genotype 3 of Orthohepevirus A species, subtype 3a (clade 3abchij) defined by Smith et al. [2]. The obtained sequence from Medvednica is strongly genetically related to other Croatian sequences, as those derived from humans in 2012 (KT583123, Zagreb county, 98.38%), 2014 (KY910801, Zagreb county, 86.58%; KY910803, Zagreb county, 90.65%) and 2017 (KY910802, Dubrovnik-Neretva county, 98.78%), wild boar from 2016 (KY910824,Vukovar-Srijem county, 98.78%) and a domestic swine from 2013 (KT583117, Međimurje County, 92.27%). The predominant strains in Croatia belong to subtypes 3a and 3c and thus, can be considered endemic [6].

Fig. 2. Neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree obtained by the analysis of the partial 242nt sequence of the ORF1 region of HEV-3 isolate derived from yellow-necked mouse sample from Croatia (MK456392).
Neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree obtained by the analysis of the partial 242nt sequence of the ORF1 region of HEV-3 isolate derived from yellow-necked mouse sample from Croatia (MK456392).
Genetic distances were calculated using the Kimura two-parameter method. Bootstrap values calculated from 1000 replicates are presented next to the tree nodes. The bar represents 0.05 nucleotide substitutions per site.

Rodents and small mammals are hosts and vectors of a wide range of zoonotic pathogens. Rodent-borne agents can be transmitted to humans directly, mostly through rodent bites and indirectly by contact with their contaminated excretions or by arthropod vectors including ticks, fleas, and mites. Few studies showed simultaneous multiple infections in rodents and small mammals in Croatia and Austria [30, 31, 32]. Seroprevalence studies done in the United States and Asia in the 1990s identified many rat species positive for HEV antibodies [1418], but the role of wild rodents and small mammals as reservoirs in HEV epidemiology is still unclear [33]. Whether HEV-3 can be added to the rodent-borne pathogens list awaits further research. Low genetic diversity of HEV-positive samples detected across the United States [33], suggest that only a limited number of HEV genotype 3 strains may be capable of infecting Rattus spp. rats and other rodents (i.e., Mus spp.). Since there are no published reports of investigation for the presence of HEV-3 in rodents and small mammals in natural conditions in general, this report brings new knowledge on the HEV-3 host range and its zoonotic potential.

The detection of hepatitis E infections is arising in Croatia, with the occasional appearance of sporadic infections in humans. A high prevalence of HEV RNA and anti-HEV antibodies in swine and wild boars has also been observed. Therefore the detection of a naturally infected forest mouse as a competent host of a HEV-3 genotype that has been previously derived from humans, swine and wild boars may present an epidemiological interspecies ‘‘link” between wildlife and domestic swine and have an important role in obtaining the virus in the environment.

The HEV-3 positive mouse was captured nearby the Croatian capital, the city of Zagrebon the mountain Medvednica (Zagreb County, Nature Park Medvednica), on a location that is very attractive for hikers, cyclists, and tourists. Interestingly, the majority of HEV-3 infected patients in Croatia originated from Zagreb County[6]. Previous studies showed that HEV-3 is circulating in humans from 2012 [34, 35] and among swine and wild boars in Croatia since 2009 [7, 36]. Moreover, the majority of swine farms and the highest density of wild boars are located in Northern Croatia [6]. The detected high similarity of here obtained HEV-3 mouse isolate and previously obtained Croatian human, wild boar and swine isolates [6, 7] indicates possible interspecies transmission of HEV and/or existence of an accessible mutual source of infection.

Even though HEV has primarily hepatic tropism, it can be found relatively active in other tissues when extrahepatic post-infection manifestations have been recorded, especially in immunocompromised subjects[37, 38]. Data on HEV tissue tropism are still scarce therefore we tested all other accessible tissues and organs (lungs, kidney, spleen, colon, heart and heart transudate) of the positive mouse. Only the liver tissue was HEV-3 RNA positive in our A. flavicollis, while other tested tissues remained negative. Since HEV infection in naturally infected animal reservoirs, such as domestic swine, show no signs of disease [39, 40], an asymptomatic, non-persistent HEV infection in yellow-necked mice, with reduced HEV detection in other tissues apart from the liver, is possible.

The HEV infection in the yellow-necked mouse occurred chronologically later than in swine and wild boars since all samples collected from rodents from the earlier periods shown to be negative indicating that our A. flavicollis is a more recent HEV host and/or that it was recently infected and that the virus remains in the mouse for a shorter period. According to Maneerat et al.[41] active virus propagation with detectable HEV RNA in sera and feces of rats is possible early post-infection (up to 30 days). Furthermore, studies done on rats demonstrated non-persistent infections [42]. Therefore, time limited short viremia could be a reason for detecting only one positive A. flavicollis indicating that the percentage of Croatian rodents carrying HEV-3 could be higher. Unfortunately, due to a lack of sera samples we cannot foresee the real picture of rodent HEV-3 seroprevalence in Croatia.

This study showed that some species of small mammals should be further investigated to evaluate their role as an epidemiological ‘link’ within the wildlife/domestic animal cycle and even a potential public health risk and reservoir of HEV-3 since the strain has been found to be genetically identical to previously detected strains derived from humans, wild boars, and swine. To confirm the true role of rodents as reservoirs or vectors of HEV-3, prolonged surveillance of HEV-3 in rodents and small mammals in Croatia and elsewhere is needed. However, our finding of the first naturally infected small rodent definitely opens a new window within the epidemiology and environmental sustainability of HEV.

Conclusions

Herein we presented the first detection of a naturally HEV infected small rodent, a yellow-necked mouse, and a report of HEV-3 occurrence and prevalence (0.21%) in wild small rodents from 11 localities in continental mountainous and lowland Croatia. Detected prevalence in Croatian wild small rodents is lower than the prevalence in Rattus spp. rats from the United States (7.85%)[33] and than the prevalence in Rattus norvegicus from Germany (6.67%) [43]. The yellow-necked mice can have a role in HEV-3 maintenance and epidemiology, therefore small rodents should be further investigated. Since the derived strain showed to be genetically highly related to strains found in humans and wild and domestic animals from Croatia it indicates that mice can be a link in the viral transmission to other susceptible species, including humans.


Zdroje

1. Smith DB, Simmonds P, Jameel S, Emerson EU, Harrison TJ, Meng XJ, et al. Consensus proposals for classification of the family Hepeviridae. J Gen Virol. 2014;95: 2223–2232. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.068429-0 24989172

2. Smith DB, Simmonds P, Izopet J, Oliveira-Filho EF, Ulrich RG, Johne R, et al. Proposed reference sequences for hepatitis E virus subtypes. J Gen Virol. 2016;97: 537–542. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000393 26743685

3. Li TC, Chijiwa K, Sera N, Ishibashi T, Etoh Y, Shinohara Y, et al. Hepatitis E virus transmission from wild boar meat. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11: 1958–1960. doi: 10.3201/eid1112.051041 16485490

4. Purcell RH, Emerson SU. HepatitisE: an emerging awareness of an old disease. J Hepatol. 2008;48(3): 494–503. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.12.008 18192058

5. Aggarwal R, Naik S. Epidemiology of hepatitis e: Current status. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24: 1484–1493. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05933.x 19686410

6. Jemeršić L, Prpić J, Brnić D, Keros T, Pandak N, Đaković-Rode O. Genetic diversity of hepatitis E virus (HEV) strains derived from humans, swine and wild boars in Croatia from 2010 to 2017. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19: 269. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3906-6 30890143

7. Prpić J, Černi S, Škorić D, Keros T, Brnić D, Cvetnić Ž, et al. Distribution and molecular characterization of Hepatitis E virus in domestic animals and wildlife in Croatia. Food Environ Virol. 2015;7: 195–205. doi: 10.1007/s12560-015-9193-5 25820413

8. Lipej Z, Novosel D, Vojta L, Roić B, Šimpraga M, Vojta A. Detection and characterisation of hepatitis E virus in naturally infected swine in Croatia. Acta Vet Hung. 2013;61:517–28. doi: 10.1556/AVet.2013.031 23974940

9. Balayan MS, Usmanov RK, Zamyatina NA, Djumalieva DI, Karas FR. 1990. Brief report: experimental hepatitis E infection in domestic pigs. J Med Virol. 1990;32: 58–59. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890320110 2122999

10. Usmanov RK, Blayan MS, Dvoinikova OV, Alymbaeva DB, Zamiatina NA, Kazachkov IUA, et al. An experimental infection in lambs by hepatitis E virus. VoprVirusol. 1994;39: 165–168.

11. Favorov MO, Nazarova OK, Yashina TL, McCaustland K, Fields HA, Margolis HS. Cattle as a possible reservoir of hepatitis E virus infection. Ninth Triennial International Symposium on Viral Hepatitis and Liver Disease (Rome), 21–25 April, 1996 (A140).

12. Meng XJ, Purcell RH, Halbur PG, Lehman JR, Webb DM, Tsareva TSet al. 1997. A novel virus in swine is closely related to the human hepatitis E virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94: 9860–9865. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.18.9860 9275216

13. Meng XJ, Halbur PG, Shapiro MS. Genetic and experimental evidence for cross-species infection by swine hepatitis E virus. J Virol. 1998;72: 9714–9721. 9811705

14. Favorov MO, Kosoy MY, Tsarev SA, Childs JE, Margolis HS. Prevalence of antibody to hepatitis E virus among rodents in the United States. J Infect Dis. 2000;181: 449–455. doi: 10.1086/315273 10669325

15. Kabrane-Lazizi Y, Fine JB, Elm J, Glass GE, Higa H, Diwan A, et al. Evidence for widespread infection of wild rats with hepatitis E virus in the United States. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;61: 331–335. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1999.61.331 10463689

16. Arankalle VA, Joshi MV, Kulkarni AM, Gandhe SS, Chobe LP, Rautmare SS, et al. Prevalence of anti-hepatitis E virus antibodies in different Indian animal species. J Viral Hepat. 2001;8: 223–227. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2893.2001.00290.x 11380801

17. Hirano M, Ding X, Li TC, Takeda N, Kawabata H, Koizumi N, et al. Evidence for widespread infection of hepatitis E virus among wild rats in Japan. Hepatol Res. 2003;27: 1–5. doi: 10.1016/s1386-6346(03)00192-x 12957199

18. Easterbrook JD, Kaplan JB, Vanasco NB, Reeves WK, Purcell RH, Kosoy MY, et al. A survey of zoonotic pathogens carried by Norway rats in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Epidemiol Infect. 2007;135: 1192–1199. doi: 10.1017/S0950268806007746 17224086

19. Obana S, Shimizu K, Yoshimatsu K, Hasebe F, Hotta K, Isozumi R, et al.Epizootiological study of rodent-borne hepatitis E virus HEV-C1 in small mammals in Hanoi, Vietnam.J Vet Med Sci. 2017;79(1): 76–81. doi: 10.1292/jvms.16-0355 27795461

20. He W, Wen Y, Xiong Y, Zhang M, Cheng M, Chen Q. The prevalence and genomic characteristics of hepatitis E virus in murine rodents and house shrews from several regions in China. BMC Vet Res. 2018;14(1): 414. doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1746-z 30577796

21. Kurucz K, Hederics D, Bali D, Kemenesi G, Horváth G, Jakab F. Hepatitis E virus in Common voles (Microtus arvalis) from an urban environment, Hungary: Discovery of a Cricetidae-specific genotype of Orthohepevirus C. Zoonoses Public Health. 2019;66(2):259–263. doi: 10.1111/zph.12543 30499180

22. Simanavicius M, Juskaite K, Verbickaite A, Jasiulionis M, Tamosiunas PL, Petraityte-Burneikiene R, et al. Detection of rat hepatitis E virus, but not human pathogenic hepatitis E virus genotype 1–4 infections in wild rats from Lithuania. Vet Microbiol. 2018;221: 129–133. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.06.014 29981698

23. Sayed IM, Verhoye L, Cocquerel L, Abravanel F, Foquet L, Montpellier C, et al. Study of hepatitis E virus infection of genotype1 and 3 in mice with humanised liver. Gut. 2017;66: 920–929. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311109 27006186

24. Shukla P, Nguyen HT, Torian U, Engle RE, Faulk K, Dalton HR, et al. Cross-species infections of cultured cells by hepatitis E virus and discovery of an infectious virus-host recombinant. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108: 2438–43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018878108 21262830

25. Tadin A, Tokarz R, Markotić A, Margaletić J, Turk N, Habuš J, et al. Molecular Survey of Zoonotic Agents in Rodents and Other Small Mammals in Croatia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;94: 466–473. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0517 26711522

26. Sikes RS, Gannon WL. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. J Mammal. 2011;92: 235–253.

27. Jothikumar N, Cromeans TL, Robertson BH, Meng XJ, Hill VR. A broadly reactive one-step real-time RT-PCR assay for rapid and sensitive detection of hepatitis E virus. J Virol Methods. 2006;131: 65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2005.07.004 16125257

28. Van der Poel WH, Verschoor F, van der Heide R, Herrera MI, Vivo A, Kooreman M, et al. Hepatitis E virus sequences in swine related to sequences in humans, The Netherlands. EmergInfecti Dis. 2001;7: 970–976.

29. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol BiolEvol. 2016; 33(7): 1870–4.

30. Tadin A, Turk N, Korva M, Margaletić J, Beck R, Vucelja M, et al.Multiple co-infections of rodents with hantaviruses, Leptospira, and Babesia in Croatia.Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012;12(5): 388–92. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2011.0632 22217170

31. Tadin A, Tokarz R, Markotić A, Margaletić J, Turk N, Habuš J, et al.Molecular Survey of Zoonotic Agents in Rodents and Other Small Mammals in Croatia.Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;94(2): 466–73 doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0517 26711522

32. Schmidt S, Essbauer SS, Mayer-Scholl A, Poppert S, Schmidt-Chanasit J, Klempa B, et al.Multiple infections of rodents with zoonotic pathogens in Austria.Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2014;14(7): 467–75. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2013.1504 24915446

33. Lack JB, Volk K, Van den Bussche RA. Hepatitis E virus genotype 3 in wild rats, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18: 1268–1273. doi: 10.3201/eid1808.120070 22840202

34. Đaković Rode O, Jemeršić L, Brnić D, Pandak N, Mikulić R, Begovac J, et al. Hepatitis E in patients with hepatic disorders and HIV-infected patients in Croatia: is one diagnostic method enough for hepatitis E diagnosis?Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33: 2231–2236. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2187-7 25005459

35. Vilibić-Čavlek T, Vilibić M, Kolarić B, Jemeršić L, Kučinar J, BarbićLj, et al. Seroepidemiology of hepatitis E in selected population groups in Croatia: a prospective pilot study. Zoonoses Public Health. 2016;63: 494–502. doi: 10.1111/zph.12254 26776465

36. Jemeršić L, Keros T, Maltar Lj, Barbić Lj, Vilibić-Čavlek T, Jeličić P, et al. Differences in hepatitis E virus (HEV) presence in naturally infected seropositive domestic pigs and wild boars–an indication of wild boars having an important role in HEV epidemiology.Vet arhiv. 2017;87: 651–663.

37. Fischer C, Hofmann M, Danzer M, Hofer K, Kaar J, Gabriel C. Seroprevalence and Incidence of hepatitis E in Blood Donors in Upper Austria. PLoS One. 2015;10(3): e0119576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119576 25751574

38. Debing Y, Moradpour D, Neyts J, Gouttenoire J. Update on hepatitis E virology: Implications for clinical practice. J Hepatol. 2016;65(1): 200–212. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.02.045 26966047

39. Williams TP, Kasorndorkbua C, Halbur PG, Haqshenas G, Guenette DK, Toth TE, et al. Evidence of extrahepatic sites of replication of the hepatitis E virus in a swine model. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39: 3040–3046. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.9.3040-3046.2001 11526125

40. Geng Y, Zhao C, Huang W, Harrison TJ, Zhang H, Geng K, et al. Detection and assessment of infectivity of hepatitis E virus in urine. J Hepatol. 2016;64: 37–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.08.034 26362822

41. Maneerat Y, Clayson ET, Myint KS, Young GD, Innis BL. Experimental infection of the laboratory rat with the hepatitis E virus. J Med Virol. 1996;48: 121–8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9071(199602)48:2<121::AID-JMV1>3.0.CO;2-B 8835343

42. Purcell RH, Engle RE, Rood MP, Kabrane-Lazizi Y, Nguyen HT, Govindarajan S, et al. Hepatitis E virus in rats, Los Angeles, California, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17: 2216–22. doi: 10.3201/eid1712.110482 22172320

43. Johne R, Plenge-Bonig A, Hess M, Ulrich RG, Reetz J, Schielke A. Detection of a novel hepatitis E-like virus in faeces of wild rats using a nested broad-spectrum RT-PCR. J Gen Virol. 2010;91: 750–758. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.016584-0 19889929


Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 11
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
nový kurz
Autori: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#