The calcium sensor OsCBL1 modulates nitrate signaling to regulate seedling growth in rice
Authors:
Jing Yang aff001; Xiaolong Deng aff001; Xiaoxin Wang aff001; Jingzhang Wang aff001; Shiyun Du aff002; Yangsheng Li aff001
Authors place of work:
State Key Laboratory of Hybrid Rice, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, P. R. China
aff001; Institute of Rice Research, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei, P. R. China
aff002
Published in the journal:
PLoS ONE 14(11)
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224962
Summary
Nitrate signaling integrates and coordinates gene expression and plant growth; however, the underlying molecular mechanisms involved remain poorly understood. Our previous study revealed that rice calcineurin B-like protein 1 (OsCBL1) modulates lateral root elongation by affecting auxin biosynthesis. Here, we report that OsCBL1 also modulates nitrate signaling to regulate rice seedlings growth. Compared with wild-type seedlings, seedlings of OsCBL1-knockdown (OsCBL1-KD) plants showed a suppressed growth phenotype, which included reduced root and shoot fresh weights and shorter radicles, crown roots, and lateral roots, when grown in nitrogen-free conditions. Although the growth defects of OsCBL1-KD plants could be partially rescued by the addition of nitrate to the growth conditions, the nitrate uptake capability of the OsCBL1-KD plants did not differ from that of wild-type plants as assessed via nitrate content and 15NO3− influx experiments. The nitrate-regulated expression of nitrate signal sentinel genes (OsNRT2.1 and OsNRT2.2) was affected in the OsCBL1-KD plants under both long- and short-term nitrate treatments. Overall, our results showed a novel role for OsCBL1 in the regulation of nitrate signaling and nitrate-mediated rice growth.
Keywords:
Gene expression – Rice – Gene regulation – Seedlings – Nitrates – Calcium signaling – Root growth – Protein kinase signaling cascade
Introduction
Because they cannot escape from harsh environmental conditions like animals can, plants have evolved a sophisticated system to sense and adapt to changes in their surrounding environment, including nutrient variations. Nitrate (NO3−) is a major nitrogen source for most land plants and is known to be a dual-function molecule.
NO3− is not only a nutrient source but also a signaling molecule at the center of communication between plant genetic programs and the environment. The NO3− signaling has both long- and short-term effects. The long-term effects are important for triggering different physiological events involving plant growth affected by NO3−, including seed germination, major root and leaf growth, and the transition to the reproductive stage [1–5]. The short-term effects involve the regulation of gene expression after a short period of exposure to NO3−. At the molecular level, NO3− application can strongly and rapidly affect gene expression, which is thought to be crucial for the ability of plants to sense nutrient conditions and alter their growth process [6]. These rapid and often transient transcriptional inductions in response to NO3− are the short-term effects of NO3− signaling and are also referred to as the primary nitrate response (PNR) [7].
The PNR can occur in nitrate reductase (NR)-null mutants, which means the NO3− itself triggers the induction rather than its downstream assimilation products [8]. The PNR can also occur in the presence of protein synthesis inhibitors, showing that it does not require de novo protein synthesis [9, 10]. In Arabidopsis, many NO3− transport and assimilation genes, such as NRT2.1, CHL1/NRT1.1, NIA1, NIA2, and NIR, serve as sentinels for the PNR [2, 11]. One of the first genes found to affect the PNR was CIPK8, which encodes a calcineurin B-like (CBL)-interacting kinase that is rapidly induced by NO3− and differentially regulated in CHL1/NRT1.1 NO3− transceptor mutants (chl1–5) (9). Several PNR sentinels, including NRT2.1, CHL1/NRT1.1, NIA1, NIA2 and NiR, reduce the magnitude of induction in cipk8 mutants exposed to high-nitrate conditions, suggesting that CIPK8 is a positive regulator during the low-affinity phase of the PNR [9]. Expression of the CIPK23 gene is also transiently induced by NO3− and acts as a negative regulator of the PNR in the both low- and high- affinity phases [11].
The regulatory effect of CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) on the PNR indicates that a Ca2+ signal is involved in the perception and transmission of NO3− signaling. Moreover, recent evidence has shown that nitrate treatment increases cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentrations and activates Ca2+-sensor protein kinases (CPKs), which phosphorylate NLP transcription factors to regulate nitrate-responsive gene expression [2, 12]. As another kind of Ca2+ sensor, CBLs contain four EF-hand domains for Ca2+ binding and specifically interact and activate CIPKs to transduce calcium signals [13]. CBL7 is involved in the regulation of the low-NO3− response in Arabidopsis [14]. Whether and how CBLs play roles in the regulation of NO3− signaling remain unclear. In the present work, we provide evidence that OsCBL1 is involved in both long- and short-term NO3− signaling regulation, which in turn modulates rice seedling growth.
Materials and methods
Plant materials and growth conditions
Experiments were performed with wild-type (WT) rice (ShijinB) and transgenic OsCBL1-knockdown (OsCBL1-KD) plants reported in our previous study [15]. Seeds of the WT and knockdown plants were surface sterilized with 5% (v/v) NaClO at room temperature for 30 min and then rinsed with double-distilled water. The seeds were subsequently germinated in water at 30°C for 2 days prior to placement in 5-L vessels that contained H2O or solutions of different NaNO3 concentrations for an additional 7 days. The plants were grown in a growth chamber at 26/22°C and under a 16 /8-h light/dark photoperiod. To evaluate the PNR, 7-day-old plants growing in H2O were treated with different concentrations of NaNO3 or NaCl for the indicated time.
Gene expression analysis
Total RNA was isolated from the root using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Cat no. 15596026). An amount of ~ 2 μg of total RNA was extracted and treated with RNase-free DNase I before it was reverse transcribed to cDNA. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed in a Bio-Rad CFX96TM Real-time System (Bio-Rad, http://www.bio-rad.com) in conjunction with SYBR Green real-time PCR Master Mix. Data analysis was performed with Bio-Rad CFX Manager 3.0 software. The relative expression of target genes was normalized using the housekeeping gene Actin and EF-1a. The primers used for qRT-PCR are listed in S1 Table.
Measurement of NO3− content and 15N influx
Seven-day-old plants were used to measure the NO3− content and 15N influx. The total amount of NO3− was measured as previously described [16]. The shoots and roots of 7-day-old seedlings grown under different NO3− concentrations were collected. Approximately 0.1 g of fresh tissue samples was then ground to powder in liquid nitrogen, suspended in 1 mL of water and incubated at 45°C for 1 hour. The supernatant was collected after centrifuging at 10000 g for 15 min at 4°C and sequentially reacted with salicylic acid–H2SO4 for 20 min. After adding 2 mL of 2 M NaOH, the solution was measured at a 410-nm wavelength, and then the NO3− concentration was calculated according to a standard curve.
A 15N-influx assay was performed with 15N-labeled NaNO3 (98% atom 15N-NaNO3, Sigma-Aldrich). Seedlings were grown in H2O for 7 days and then treated with 0.2 or 2 mM 15N-NaNO3 for 30 min. The seedlings were then transferred to H2O for 3 min and treated with 0.1 mM CaSO4 for 1 min to remove the 15N-Na NO3− from the root surfaces. The roots were subsequently collected and dried at 75°C. Finally, the roots were ground, and the 15N content was determined using a Vario ISOTOPE cube analyzer (Elementar Analysensysteme, https://www.elementar.de/en.html) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Phenotypic characterization
Root images were collected using a Canon600D camera. The lengths of the radicle, crown roots, and lateral roots (near the base of the radicle, 0.5–2 cm from the seed) were measured using ImageJ software (http://imagej.nih.gov.ij/).
Results and discussion
The inhibited-growth phenotype of OsCBL1-knockdown plants can be partially rescued by NO3−
Our previous study showed that decreasing the expression of OsCBL1 (i.e., OsCBL1-KD) inhibited the growth of rice roots under 1/2-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium growth conditions [15]. Root growth is inextricably linked to nutrient elements. The CBL1 gene has been reported to be involved in the uptake of K+ and NH4+ in Arabidopsis [17, 18]; furthermore, OsCBL1 localizes to the plasma membrane, and CBL1 is also involved in the regulation of K+ uptake in rice [19]. To further study how OsCBL1 participates in the regulation of rice growth and development and whether the regulation is related to the uptake of nutrient elements, we compared the growth of WT and OsCBL1-KD plants in H2O and in solution with different concentrations of NO3−. When the plants were grown in water, the growth of the OsCBL1-KD plants was significantly inhibited compared with that of the WT plants; when 0.2–2 mM NO3− was supplied, the growth difference between OsCBL1-KD and WT was partially reduced (Fig 1 and S1 Fig). Low NO3− concentrations (0.2–0.5 mM) significantly promoted the growth of rice seedlings, and the growth was more pronounced for OsCBL1-KD than for WT (Fig 1B–1K). High NO3− concentrations (1–2 mM) suppressed the growth of WT seedlings, but this effect was weaker for OsCBL1-KD than for WT under 1 mM NO3− conditions. Therefore, compared with the WT plants, the OsCBL1-KD plants were more sensitive to the stimulatory effects of low NO3− but were insensitive to the inhibitory effects of high NO3−. These results indicate that in rice, OsCBL1 plays an important role in self-development programs and in the regulatory effects of NO3− on rice growth.
The growth inhibition of OsCBL1 knockdown plants is not associated with NO3− uptake or transport
To investigate how OsCBL1 influences the regulatory effects of NO3− on rice growth, we first analyzed the NO3− content in 7-day-old WT and OsCBL1-KD plants under different growth conditions. There were no significant differences in the content of NO3− in the roots or shoots between the WT and OsCBL1-KD plants (Fig 2A and 2B); the NO3− content in seeds also did not differ (Fig 2C). Using 15N-labeled NO3−, we then compared the uptake of NO3−. The WT plants absorbed slightly more 15 NO3− than did the OsCBL1-KD plants when supplied with 2 mM 15NO3− for 30 min, but no significant difference was detected when the plants were supplied with 0.2 mM 15 NO3− (Fig 2D). Similar to what occurred for the NO3− content, there was no significant difference in nitrogen content between the WT and OsCBL1-KD plants after 15NO3− treatment (Fig 2E). These results indicated that the growth difference between the WT and OsCBL1-KD plants was not due to the difference in NO3− uptake capability or NO3− content.
OsCBL1 affects the expression of NO3− transport-related genes under different NO3− conditions
In addition to being an essential nutrient, NO3− acts as a signaling molecule to regulate gene expression. NO3− signaling is at the center of communication between plant genetic programs and the environment and regulates plant growth, development and stress responses [20]. Many NO3− transport- and assimilation-related genes have also been found to be involved in NO3− signaling. To further investigate how NO3− affects the growth of WT and OsCBL1-KD plants under different growth conditions, we evaluated the expression of some NO3− transport-related genes (OsNRT2.1, OsNRT2.2, OsNAR2.1, and OsNAR2.2) under different growth conditions. The results showed that with the addition of NO3−, the expression of OsNRT2.1, OsNRT2.2, and OsNAR2.1 decreased in both the WT and OsCBL1-KD plants (Fig 3A–3C), suggesting that the expression of these genes was induced by nitrogen starvation, similar to the results for nitrate transporter genes (AtNRT2.1, AtNRT2.4, AtNRT2.5) in Arabidopsis [14, 21, 22]. Under conditions of no and low NO3− content, the expressions of NRTs and NARs was higher in the OsCBL1-KD plants than in the WT plants (Fig 3A–3D), indicating the presence of altered NO3− sensing in the OsCBL1-KD mutant. Considering that the NO3− content in both the WT and OsCBL1-KD plants increased after NO3− addition, and the lack of significant difference between WT and CBL1-KD plants (Fig 2A and 2B), these results indicate that the difference in the expression of these genes did not directly affect NO3− uptake or translocation but may have affected the sensing and/or transmission of NO3− signal, subsequently regulating rice growth. Compared with WT plants, the OsCBL1-KD plants in the same NO3− conditions were not more NO3− starved but seemed to respond more intensely to nitrogen starvation signals. Therefore, OsCBL1 likely plays an important role in signaling pathways involved in intracellular NO3− perception.
OsCBL1 regulates the primary nitrate response
As a sentinel for PNR, AtNRT2.1 is induced not only by nitrogen starvation but also by short-term NO3− treatment [7]. To further confirm that the NO3− signaling changed in OsCBL1-KD plants, the expression of six NO3− induced genes was analyzed in OsCBL1-KD plants to determine whether OsCBL1 is involved in the regulation of the PNR. These genes included two NO3− uptake transporter genes, OsNRT2.1 and OsNRT2.2, and their partners, OsNAR2.1 and OsNAR2.2, as well as two NO3− assimilation genes, OsNR1 and OsNR2. Wild-type and OsCBL1-KD plants were grown in H2O for 7 days and then were exposed to different concentrations of nitrate solution. The expression levels of all six genes were significantly induced by NO3− in both the WT and OsCBL1-KD plants. The magnitude of induction of OsNRT2.1, OsNRT2.2, and OsNR2 was significantly reduced in OsCBL1-KD plants compared with WT plants under NO3− induction (Fig 4A, 4C and 4E), while the expressions levels of OsNAR2.1, OsNAR2.2, and OsNR1 were similar between the WT and OsCBL1-KD plants (Fig 4B, 4D and 4F). A decrease in the NO3−-induced expression of OsNRT2.1 and OsNRT2.2 occurred under both low and high NO3− concentrations, while the expression of OsNR2 was repressed only under high nitrate concentration (Fig 4A, 4C and 4E). These data suggest that the existence of the PNR pathways that either involve or do not involve OsCBL1. We further surveyed the time course of the expression of OsNRT2.1 and OsNRT2.2 under 2 mM NO3− concentrations. Although the expression of the two genes was relatively high in OsCBL1-KD under nitrogen-free conditions, the expression increased more quickly and intensely in the WT plants under NO3− treatment (Fig 4G and 4H). The expression of AtNRT2.1 in plants growing under high-N condition is inhibited [7] but is induced when exposed to nitrate for a short period of time regardless of whether plants grow under N-sufficient or N-deficient conditions [23].
These different regulatory activities indicate that there are different regulatory pathways between long-term and short-term nitrate signaling. Many genes have been characterized to regulate the expression of AtNRT2.1, such as NLP6, NLP7, LBD37/38/39, and NIGT1, which are involved in short-term nitrate signaling and NLP7, TGA1/4, and HIN9/IWS1, which are involved in long-term nitrate signaling [24]. Our results indicate that OsCBL1 is involved in both long- and short-term nitrate signaling and plays different roles in the regulation of OsNRT2.1 and OsNRT2.2 expression.
In Arabidopsis, two CBL-interacting protein kinases, CIPK8 and CIPK23, are involved in PNR regulation. The CIPK8 gene is rapidly induced by NO3−, and CIPK8 acts as a positive regulator in PNR because the induction of several PNR sentinel genes by NO3− is reduced in the cipk8 mutant under high NO3− concentrations [9]. The CIPK23 gene is also transiently induced by NO3−, and the induction of NRT2.1 by NO3− is higher in the cipk23 mutant than in WT plants at both high and low NO3− concentrations [11]. The OsCBL1 gene was not induced by NO3− under long- or short-term treatment (S2 Fig), and its product differentially regulated the expression of different PNR marker genes depending on the NO3− concentration (Fig 4). These results suggest that OsCBL1 may function as a converter that accepts different Ca2+ signals induced by different NO3− concentrations and transduces Ca2+ signals downstream by activating different OsCIPKs and regulating gene expression.
A recent study revealed the function of Ca2+ sensor CPKs to be master regulators that regulate NO3−-activated signaling [2]. Here, we revealed the role of another type of Ca2+ sensor CBL in NO3− signaling. Considering that CIPK is also involved in the regulation of NO3− signaling [9, 11], the CBL–CIPK pathway should be another NO3−-coupled Ca2+ signaling mechanism that regulates the plant nutrient-growth network. The complex interaction between CBL and CIPK members indicates that the CBL–CIPK module might play an important role in relaying NO3− signaling specifically to downstream targets. Future studies are likely to clarify how CBLs sense distinct Ca2+ signatures caused by nutrient signaling and identify targets of CIPKs, such as channels, transporters, transcription factors and other regulators involved in all aspects of nutrient-mediated growth regulation in plants.
Supporting information
S1 Fig [a]
The root phenotype of WT and -knockdown plants under different nitrate concentration.
S2 Fig [a]
The expression pattern of under different nitrate treatment.
S1 Table [docx]
Primer sequences used in this study.
Zdroje
1. Alboresi A, Gestin C, Leydecker MT, Bedu M, Meyer C, Truong HN. Nitrate, a signal relieving seed dormancy in Arabidopsis. Plant, cell & environment. 2005;28(4):500–12.
2. Liu KH, Niu Y, Konishi M, Wu Y, Du H, Sun Chung H, et al. Discovery of nitrate-CPK-NLP signalling in central nutrient-growth networks. Nature. 2017;545(7654):311–6. doi: 10.1038/nature22077 28489820
3. Rahayu YS, Walch-Liu P, Neumann G, Romheld V, von Wiren N, Bangerth F. Root-derived cytokinins as long-distance signals for NO3—induced stimulation of leaf growth. Journal of experimental botany. 2005;56(414):1143–52. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri107 15710629
4. Vidal EA, Moyano TC, Canales J, Gutierrez RA. Nitrogen control of developmental phase transitions in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of experimental botany. 2014;65(19):5611–8. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru326 25129132
5. Yan D, Easwaran V, Chau V, Okamoto M, Ierullo M, Kimura M, et al. NIN-like protein 8 is a master regulator of nitrate-promoted seed germination in Arabidopsis. Nature communications. 2016;7:13179. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13179 27731416
6. Krouk G, Mirowski P, LeCun Y, Shasha DE, Coruzzi GM. Predictive network modeling of the high-resolution dynamic plant transcriptome in response to nitrate. Genome biology. 2010;11(12):R123. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-12-r123 21182762
7. Medici A, Krouk G. The primary nitrate response: a multifaceted signalling pathway. Journal of experimental botany. 2014;65(19):5567–76. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru245 24942915
8. Wang R, Tischner R, Gutierrez RA, Hoffman M, Xing X, Chen M, et al. Genomic analysis of the nitrate response using a nitrate reductase-null mutant of Arabidopsis. Plant physiology. 2004;136(1):2512–22. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.044610 15333754
9. Hu HC, Wang YY, Tsay YF. AtCIPK8, a CBL-interacting protein kinase, regulates the low-affinity phase of the primary nitrate response. The Plant journal: for cell and molecular biology. 2009;57(2):264–78.
10. Redinbaugh MG, Campbell WH. Glutamine Synthetase and Ferredoxin-Dependent Glutamate Synthase Expression in the Maize (Zea mays) Root Primary Response to Nitrate (Evidence for an Organ-Specific Response). Plant physiology. 1993;101(4):1249–55. doi: 10.1104/pp.101.4.1249 12231779
11. Ho CH, Lin SH, Hu HC, Tsay YF. CHL1 functions as a nitrate sensor in plants. Cell. 2009;138(6):1184–94. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.004 19766570
12. Riveras E, Alvarez JM, Vidal EA, Oses C, Vega A, Gutierrez RA. The Calcium Ion Is a Second Messenger in the Nitrate Signaling Pathway of Arabidopsis. Plant physiology. 2015;169(2):1397–404. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00961 26304850
13. Sanyal SK, Pandey A, Pandey GK. The CBL-CIPK signaling module in plants: a mechanistic perspective. Physiologia plantarum. 2015;155:89–108. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12344 25953089
14. Ma Q, Tang RJ, Zheng XJ, Wang SM, Luan S. The calcium sensor CBL7 modulates plant responses to low nitrate in Arabidopsis. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2015;468(1–2):59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.10.164 26549233
15. Yang J, Zhang X, Huang Y, Feng Y, Li Y. OsCBL1 modulates lateral root elongation in rice via affecting endogenous indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis. Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao. 2015;42(6):331–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2015.03.004 26165499
16. Yan Y, Wang H, Hamera S, Chen X, Fang R. miR444a has multiple functions in the rice nitrate-signaling pathway. The Plant journal: for cell and molecular biology. 2014;78(1):44–55.
17. Xu J, Li HD, Chen LQ, Wang Y, Liu LL, He L, et al. A protein kinase, interacting with two calcineurin B-like proteins, regulates K+ transporter AKT1 in Arabidopsis. Cell. 2006;125(7):1347–60. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.011 16814720
18. Straub T, Ludewig U, Neuhaeuser B. The Kinase CIPK23 Inhibits Ammonium Transport in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant cell. 2017.
19. Li J, Long Y, Qi GN, Li J, Xu ZJ, Wu WH, et al. The Os-AKT1 channel is critical for K+ uptake in rice roots and is modulated by the rice CBL1-CIPK23 complex. The Plant cell. 2014;26(8):3387–402. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.123455 25096783
20. Guan P. Dancing with Hormones: A Current Perspective of Nitrate Signaling and Regulation in Arabidopsis. Frontiers in plant science. 2017;8:1697. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01697 29033968
21. Girin T, Lejay L, Wirth J, Widiez T, Palenchar PM, Nazoa P, et al. Identification of a 150 bp cis-acting element of the AtNRT2.1 promoter involved in the regulation of gene expression by the N and C status of the plant. Plant, cell & environment. 2007;30(11):1366–80.
22. Scheible WR, Morcuende R, Czechowski T, Fritz C, Osuna D, Palacios-Rojas N, et al. Genome-wide reprogramming of primary and secondary metabolism, protein synthesis, cellular growth processes, and the regulatory infrastructure of Arabidopsis in response to nitrogen. Plant physiology. 2004;136(1):2483–99. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.047019 15375205
23. Wang R, Xing X, Wang Y, Tran A, Crawford NM. A genetic screen for nitrate regulatory mutants captures the nitrate transporter gene NRT1.1. Plant physiology. 2009;151(1):472–8. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.140434 19633234
24. Zhao L, Liu F, Crawford NM, Wang Y. Molecular Regulation of Nitrate Responses in Plants. International journal of molecular sciences. 2018;19(7).
Článok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 11
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Nejasný stín na plicích – kazuistika
- Masturbační chování žen v ČR − dotazníková studie
- Úspěšná resuscitativní thorakotomie v přednemocniční neodkladné péči
- Dlouhodobá recidiva a komplikace spojené s elektivní operací břišní kýly
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- A daily diary study on maladaptive daydreaming, mind wandering, and sleep disturbances: Examining within-person and between-persons relations
- A 3’ UTR SNP rs885863, a cis-eQTL for the circadian gene VIPR2 and lincRNA 689, is associated with opioid addiction
- A substitution mutation in a conserved domain of mammalian acetate-dependent acetyl CoA synthetase 2 results in destabilized protein and impaired HIF-2 signaling
- Molecular validation of clinical Pantoea isolates identified by MALDI-TOF