Genome-wide SNP analyses reveal population structure of Portunus pelagicus along Vietnam coastline
Authors:
Binh Thuy Dang aff001; Muhammad Arifur Rahman aff001; Sang Quang Tran aff001; Henrik Glenner aff003
Authors place of work:
Department of Biology, Institute for Biotechnology and Environment, Nha Trang University, Nha Trang City, Vietnam
aff001; Department of Graduate Studies, Nha Trang University, Nha Trang City, Vietnam
aff002; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
aff003
Published in the journal:
PLoS ONE 14(11)
Category:
Research Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224473
Summary
The blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus Linnaeus, 1758) is one of the commercially exploited crab fishery resources in Vietnam. This is the first study to provide a broad survey of genetic diversity, population structure and migration patterns of P. pelagicus along the Vietnamese coastline. The crab samples were collected from northern, central and southern Vietnam. Here, we used a panel of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) generated from restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RADseq). After removing 32 outlier loci, 306 putatively neutral SNPs from 96 individuals were used to assess fine-scale population structure of blue swimming crab. The mean observed heterozygosity (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He) per locus was 0.196 and 0.223, respectively. Pairwise Fst and hierarchical AMOVA supported significant differentiation of central and northern from southern populations (P<0.01). Population structure analyses revealed that P. pelagicus in the south is a separate fisheries unit from the north and center. Contemporary migration patterns supported high migration between northern and central populations and restricted genetic exchange within the southern population. In contrast, historic gene flow provides strong evidence for single panmictic population. The results are useful for understanding current status of P. pelagicus in the wild under an environment changing due to natural and anthropogenic stresses, with implications for fisheries management.
Keywords:
Genetic loci – Population genetics – Animal migration – Swimming – Inbreeding – Vietnam – Gene flow – Crabs
Introduction
The tropical to subtropical Vietnamese coastal zone is divided into the Gulf of Tonkin in the North, the central coast, the southeast coast and the Gulf of Thailand in the South [1,2]. The exclusive economic zone (EEZ) covers about 1 million km2 and 3260 km of coastline along the East Sea (the Vietnamese name for the South China Sea). In winter, currents flow in a North East-South West direction while in summer, ocean currents flow from the South West-North East [3,4] with the eddies existing at the southern and central parts of the Vietnamese coastline [3]. Climate change and human activities including aquaculture, overexploitation, and illegal fishing are threatening coastal habitats (e.g. seagrass beds) and biodiversity [1,5–7].
The blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus) is a scavenging tropical marine species, widely distributed in the Indian and Pacific oceans, the East coast of Africa, the Mediterranean Sea and southern Japan [7–10]. In Vietnam, it is distributed in the wild throughout the long coastline and aggregated densely in Kien Giang (south of the Mekong Delta) waters [8,11]. It matures and reproduces continuously in one spawning season [12–14]. Planktonic larvae may be transported long distances, supposedly driven by a combination of factors such as temperature, wind, surface currents and salinity [14–17], and spatial distribution depends on larval stages [15,16,18].
P. pelagicus is present in large numbers with great value for commercial fisheries exporting to the USA, Europe and Japan [7,19,20]. According to the FAO (2016) [21], global catch and aquaculture production were 265,896 tonnes, and 29 tonnes, respectively. In Vietnam, the total catch in 2010 was 11,300 tonnes, while production in Kien Giang reached 7,800 tonnes in 2013, suggesting a decline due to overharvesting [11]. Gillnet and crab traps were reported as the dominant fishing gears of P. pelagicus (accounting for 77.8% and 22.2%, respectively) [11].
A crab management plan for Vietnam is in place. However, due to unsystematic application of management measures (the minimum landing size and the closed season), and lack of demographic information, management is considered ineffective [22,23]. Recently, genetic studies have increasingly been applied to improve understanding of stock size, gene flow, distribution and migration patterns of subpopulations in mixed fisheries [24–27]. Population information including connectivity across species distribution range, exchange rate and source-sink dynamics are important for understanding potential impacts of bio-physical factors [28–31], human-induced fragmentation [32] and pollution [33,34], or overexploitation [35–37]. Among the wide-range of molecular approaches, restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RADseq) is well known for its ability to identify and score thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which are randomly distributed across the target genomes using next generation sequencing [38–40]. RAD methods are being used and developed with many techniques such as mbRAD [41], 2b-RAD [42], ddRAD [38] and ezRAD [43].
Several studies have revealed different population structuring of P. pelagicus throughout its distribution range. In the early 2000s, Yap et al. (2002) [44] and Sezmis et al (2004) [45] detected high population genetic structure in Australia with microsatellites. Similarity, Klinbunga (2007, 2010) [46,47] using DNA polymorphism assays (RADPs and AFLPs) identified strong genetic population structure in Thailand. A more recent studies utilizing mitochondrial DNA markers discovered either limited or high genetic structure in China and the Philippines, respectively [48,49]. In both studies, cryptic species of P. pelagicus have been reported as previously recorded by Lai et al (2010 [10]. Additionally, using microsatellites, Chai et al (2016) [50] identified low genetic structure of P. pelagicus in Malaysia, while Ren et al. (2016) [51] found distinct populations in Indonesia with RADP plus nuclear DNA marker (16S rDNA). Recently, Miao et al. (2017) [52] applied RADseq to investigate 91 SNPs suggesting these as helpful makers for population research resources of this valuable species. Despite the economic and ecological importance, no studies are known of population genetics of P. pelagicus in Vietnam, although limited published studies examining genetic structure of marine organisms have indicated high connectivity in the dynamic and complex Vietnam East Sea waters [29,53].
The goal of this study was to develop SNPs using RADSeq, previously not accomplished for P. pelagicus in Vietnam, to better understand fine-scale population structuring and gene flow along the Vietnamese coastline and to provide data on resilience and sustainability for fisheries management.
Materials and methods
Sampling sites and tissue collection
Blue swimming crabs were collected along the north-south geographical temperature gradient: Cat Ba Island—Hai Phong City; Ha Long Bay—Quang Ninh Province (northern population), Nha Trang Bay and Van Phong Bay—Khanh Hoa province; Song Cau and Tuy Hoa—Phu Yen province (central population), and Phu Quoc Island, Rach Gia City—Kien Giang Province (southern population) (Fig 1, Table 1).
The crabs were collected at the exploitation sites, transported alive in aerated sea water to the laboratory where they were kept in aquaria until tissue sampling. Information on sampling sites and crab size (carapace width and weight) were presented in S1 Table. All tissue samples were taken from chelipeds of fresh crab and preserved in 95% ethanol.
Research methodology
DNA extraction and digestion
Genomic DNA was extracted from preserved tissue samples using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer's instructions, and treated with RNase (100 mg/mL) to remove residual RNA. Extracted DNA was eluted three times (100 μl elution/time) to get better DNA quality. All elutions were assessed using gel electrophoresis (1% agarose gel). The best elution (sharp, high weight molecular bands, no smear) was selected to determine the concentration by Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen). Selected DNA templates (100 ng, concentration ≥ 3 ng/μl) were then purified using AMPureXP (Agencourt) beads using a 2:1 template to bead volume ratio with the beads left in.
Purified DNA from each crab individual was simultaneously digested with two restriction enzymes: MboI and Sau3AI (NEB). Each digestion was performed in 25 μl reactions: 2.5 μl SmartCut Buffer (10X), 0.5 μl MboI and 0.5 μl Sau3AI (5 unit/μl), and 21.5 μl of DNA template (eluate from the beads). Digestions were incubated at 37°C for 3 h to overnight, and then 65°C for 20 min, cleaned with PEG solution (10 g PEG, 7.3 g NaCl, plus water up to 49 ml), and eluted with 20.1 μl Illumina Resuspension Buffer.
EzRAD library preparation
Cleaned digestions were inserted directly into the Illumina TruSeq nano DNA library Prep kit following the Sample Preparation v2 Guide starting with the “Perform End Repair” step for one-third volume reactions (Supplement S1 [38]). Digested libraries were end-repaired, 350 bp size-selected by SP bead. Firstly, SP bead:H20 (1.5:1) were added to removed >550 bp fragments, the supernatant collected and applied to 10 μl SP bead to subsequently remove <350 bp fragments”. The 3ʹ ends of selected libraries were then adenylated and Illumina adapters were ligated to the digested genomic DNA samples. PCR reactions were performed using a total volume of 15 μl including 1.5 μl Illumina PCR Primer Cocktail, 6 μl Illumina Enhanced PCR Mix, 1.875 μl ddH2O and 5.625 μl DNA libraries. Biorad thermocyclers (Icycler) were used under the following temperature program: initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, followed by 8 cycles of 98°C for 20s, 60°C for 15s and 72°C for 30s. Final extension was done at 72°C for 5 min and the soaking temperature was set to 4°C.
PCR products (The 400–500 bp fragments of which 120 bp are the ligated adapters) were inspected using a 1.5% agarose gel with ethidium bromide and bands were visualized under UV transilluminator. PCR products were purified using SP Beads (1:1), and quantified using qPCR. DNA libraries were sequenced as paired-end 100 bp runs on HiSeq 2500/4000 system (Illumina) in Texas A&M University Corpus Christi Genomics Core Laboratory, USA.
Data analyses
SNPs discovery and filtering
SNP detection was implemented by dDocent v2.0 pipeline [54]. At first, raw FastQ files were trimmed using Trimmomatic v0.3 [55] to simultaneously remove Illumina adapter sequences, and any bases that had a quality score (Q-score) of less than 10 [43]. These reads were clustered and input into de novo reference assembly in Rainbow v2.0.2 [56] and CD-HIT v4.6.1 [57,58] based on overall sequence similarity (90% by default). Quality-trimmed reads were mapped to the reference using BWA v0.7.12 [59,60] with the MEM algorithm [61]. SAM files were converted to BAM files using SAMTOOLS [62] and output was further restricted to reads with mapping quality above 10.
SNP calling was performed using Freebayes v0.9.21 [63] with default parameters. Raw SNP files were concatenated into a single variant call format (VCF) file using VCFtools v0.1.11 [64]. The raw SNPs were then filtered with VCFtools and VCFfilter. Primary filtering steps included: minor allele frequency (MAF > 0.05), minimum mean depth (≥ 5 mean DP ≤ 10), INDEL loci (this step decomposed insertion and deletion genotypes), Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE with p < 0.001), mean quality score (Q > 30), max-missing (to apply a genotype call rate of 90% across all individuals), and number of variants (restricted to bi-allelic SNPs). Secondary filtering steps included keeping loci based on allelic balance (AB > 0.3), mean mapping quality (0.9 < MQM/MQMR < 1.05), and proportion of alternate alleles (0.05 < PAIRED/PAIREDR < 1.75). Putative SNPs were submitted to rad_haplotyper (https://github.com/chollenbeck/rad_haplotyper) to remove possible paralogs, and one SNP filtering to get the validated SNP panel.
Outlier loci detection and Linkage-disequilibrium (LD) analysis
Our final filtered panel of SNPs was run in BayeScan v2.1 [65] under default parameter settings to identify loci under divergent or balancing selection. A false discovery rate (FDR) correction of 0.05 was applied [66].
LD was measured as the squared pairwise correlation coefficient between loci (r2) calculated using the ‘LD’ function in the R package ‘genetics’[67]. Selected outlier clusters (SOC) and Compound outlier clusters (COC) were identified by LD network analysis using R package ‘LDna’ [68], optimal value of φ and |E|min parameter and LD threshold was set up for SOC. LD network were constructed using the R package ‘igraph’ [69].
All loci putatively identified by either programs were removed from the dataset to generate a panel of neutral SNPs.
Genetic diversity and relatedness
Numbers of alleles (Na), effective numbers of alleles (Ne), expected (He) and observed (Ho) heterozygosity, and inbreeding coefficients (GIS) were calculated for each sampled population and over all populations across the Vietnam coastline using GenAlexv6.5 [70] and GenoDive v.2.0b27 [71].
High levels of relatedness can impact analyses of population structure and estimates of population size, so relationships between individuals were estimated with the R package ‘related’ [72] using the dyadic ([73] and triadic [74] maximum likelihood estimators and allowing for inbreeding. For both estimators 95% confidence intervals were calculated with 500 bootstrap events for each pairwise comparison. Potential pairs were identified as exhibiting a related value. Due to the imbalanced numbers of related pairs among populations leading to reduced sample size and avoiding positive bias in estimates due to underestimating relatedness in the overall population [75], further analyses were run with two datasets, one containing all individuals (with related pairs) and one with one putative individual removed per related pair (related individuals removed).
Analyses of population structure
Pairwise comparisons of Fst values between P. pelagicus populations werecomputed in ARLEQUIN [76] to test for significant differentiation among sampled sites. All p-values underwent FDR correction to avoid false positives resulting from multiple comparisons [66]. A hierarchical analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was performed to test for significant population structure within species, following two group options: geographically-defined populations (northern, central and southern) and combined individuals from the north and center into a single population, and considering individuals from the south as a separate population (northern-central and southern) using the program ARLEQUIN.
We tested for population connectivity and structure in the program Structure v2.3.4 [77,78] using a model-based Bayesian clustering method to infer the number of lineages, K, in a dataset. Structure was run to test K values of 1 through 4 with 10,000 iterations of burn-in followed by 5,000 Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) steps, using the correlated allele frequencies admixture model. The optimal value of K was evaluated using the Evanno method [79] by Structure Harvester v0.6.94 [80]. A Discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) was performed using the R package ‘adegenet’ [81]. This analysis provides a graphic description of the genetic divergence among populations in multivariate space.
Migration patterns
Historic gene flow between populations was estimated using the Bayesian inference implemented in MIGRATE-n v3.6.11 [82]. MIGRATE-n’s implementation of coalescent theory measures migration 4 × Ne generations in the past [32,83]. Sample sizes were reduced for each population to obtain 200 loci genotyped in 100% of individuals used for the analysis. The run was performed using 500,000 recorded genealogies sampled every 100 steps, preceded by a burn-in of 20,000. Four hot chains were used with temperatures: T1 = 1.0, T2 = 1.5, T3 = 3.0 and T4 = 1.0x106. After optimization, the maximum mutation-scaled effective population size (θ) prior was set at 0.1 while the maximum mutation-scaled migration (M) prior was set at 20,000. Five hypotheses of migration among populations were tested: (1) symmetric migration rates between all sites (Panmixia Model), (2) non-symmetric migration rates between all sites (Full Model) (3) migration between all sites only from the north to the south (North-South Model), (4) migration between all sites only from the south to the north (South-North Model), (5) migration occurring only between neighboring, north-center sites but no migration between south population (South Separate Model). The most likely model was chosen using the Bezier ln produced by Migrate-N according to Beerli et al. (2009) [84]. To elucidate the recent migration patterns, estimate relative migration levels (Nm) between populations were calculated based on neutral SNPs using divMigrate function [85] of R package “diveRsity” [86]. Gene flow patterns were visualized using network graphics produced using the R package “qgraph” [87].
Ethics Statement: All crab were collected from fish markets or through normal fishing activities and therefore within the guidelines of approved IACUC procedures, and did not need sampling permission in Vietnam. This study did not involve protected or endangered species
Data Archiving: Upon acceptance, the unmodified sequence data in FASTQ format used in this research along with corresponding metadata will be uploaded and archived in the publicly accessible Genomic Observatories Metadatabase (GeOMe, http://www.geome-db.org/).
Results
SNP discovery and filtering
Results of 165 libraries of P. pelagicus along the Vietnamese coastline generated 604123297 reads with a reading length of 101 bp. The optimal reference assembly of 3280843 bp was constructed from 9583 RAD tags. Initially, 107115 raw SNPs were detected. After filtering steps, 96 individuals were successfully genotyped at 338 valid SNPs. Information on individuals removed and SNPs retained at each step of filtering and data analysis is presented in S2 Table.
Outlier loci detection
BayeScan identified thirteen SNPs as outliers (q<0.05, α>0, FDR ≤ 0.05) from the panel of 338 putative SNPs used to detect selection footprints (Fig 2D). LD network presented one selected outlier cluster (SOC) including 32 loci (φ = 1 and |E|min = 30, λmin = 0.79, LD threshold = 0.39) (Fig 2A–2C). The outlier loci detected by BayeScan were included in the SOC of LD network. In total, 32 loci were removed from the SNP panel and the 306 remaining loci were assumed to be neutral.
Genetic diversity and relatedness
Genetic diversity of P. pelagicus is presented in Table 1. The mean observed number of alleles (Na) and effective number of alleles (Ne) of the populations were 1.930 and 1.354 respectively. Average observed (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He) were shown across all populations, ranging from 0.166–0.216 (mean 0.196) to 0.211–0.246 (mean 0.23), respectively. Inbreeding coefficients ranged from 0.154 (Center) to 0.265 (South), with an overall GIS for all individuals at 0.168. % Polymorphic sites were highest in the central (98.22%), and lowest in the southern population (88.46%).
Analyses of genetic relationships between individuals revealed 23 pairs of putative half siblings and 5 pairs of putative full sibling (Table 2) following removal of 16 individuals (S2 Table). Both full and half siblings (22 pairs) occurred abundantly within the southern population, while the other sibling pairs occurred in remaining sampling sites (Table 2).
Population structure and migration patterns
AMOVA results (Table 3) of two hierarchical arrangements (3 populations versus 2 populations) and with two data set (with related pairs and related individuals removed) showed the majority of the variation (80.91–87.5%) in P. pelagicus was found within individuals, and highly significant in all cases (FIT = 0.125–0.19, P<0.001). The proportion of variance explained by differences among populations (FST) were larger in the two-populations (17.43% with related pairs and 15.03% when related individuals removed) than in the three-pops arrangements (11.29% and 8.06%, respectively). It is clear that related individuals contributed to the percentage of variation according to different clustering of populations, however, in all cases the difference were highly significant (P<0.001). With all arrangements and two datasets, among individuals within populations (FIS) differentiation were not significant.
Pairwise Fst values between southern population to northern and central populations showed statistically significant genetic differentiation (P<0.001) in all arrangements, and data sets (Table 4). In three-population clustering, the southern population showed more differentiation with the northern (0.199 with related pairs and 0.181 with related individuals removed) than the central (0.143 and 0.117, respectively). However, connectivity was observed between northern and central populations in all cases (Fst = 0.004, P = 0.45 and Fst = 0.0024, P = 0.687).
The STRUCTURE analysis, plotted with a K of 2 as chosen by the Evanno method, also showed a clear distinction between the south and the remaining two populations. The similar patterns were observed either with related pairs or related individuals removed from SNPs panels. The southern population was assigned to a first lineage with high certainty (98.4% and 98% composition of the “red” lineage and 1.6% and 2% of “green”. Northern and central populations were assigned to the second lineage with the north represented by a dominance (98.2% and 98%) of “green” lineage, and central exhibiting a mixing of “green/red” with percentages of 82.5/17.5 and 80/20 (Fig 3A left and right).
The Discriminant analysis of principal component (DAPC) showed a clear distinction between the southern population from northern and central populations in both neutral SNPs data sets (Fig 3B). In the dataset with removed related individuals, the northern and central populations were somewhat separated ((Fig 3B, right). However, DAPC analysis based on the 32 under-selected loci showed similar results to neutral related pairs SNPs (Fig 3C).
Historic migration results strongly supported the Panmixia model based on the highest Bezier approximation score (ln = -115475.9) in which migration was maintained among all sites with random mating between crab individuals (Table 5). The analyses disclosed that there was no mating restriction between crab individuals in the history supposed to be over 1000s of years [32,83]. The populations were able to share genetic material either through larval dispersal due to currents or via migration of adult crabs. Directional migration relative rates among recent P. pelagicus populations range from 0.1 to 1 (Fig 3D). Among these, asymmetric directional migration seems to have occurred from southern to northern and central populations, however, bootstrap analysis (nbs<0) showed that directional migration was not significant. Migration from northern to central, however, involved significant asymmetric migration (nbs>0) (S1 Fig).
Discussion
The fine scale population structure of swimming crab, applicable in fisheries management was investigated in both putative neutral and outlier loci. Overall, the current analysis based on SNP panels (including or removing related individuals) all showed similar results. The genetic patterns appear to indicate that P. pelagicus in northern-central and southern areas of the Vietnamese coastline maintain distinct populations. Significant pairwise Fst comparisons showed strong genetic differentiation between southern to central and northern populations. Furthermore, the hierarchical AMOVA results supported two regional clusters with higher proportions of variation compared to a three-population arrangement (Table 3). Structure and DAPC analyses clearly divided the populations into two subdivisions (northern–central and southern). Outlier SNPs, which represented higher genetic differentiation, and respected providing better resolution to detect fine-scale population structure, identified the same patterns as neutral loci, suggested neutral loci themselves may reflected geographical adaptation ([88]. P. pelagicus is well known as a migratory species, both in adult and larval stages. Male and female crabs can move between estuaries and open oceans for spawning and/or responding to lowered salinities [7]. As spawning of P. pelagicus occurs year-round [11], following the northeast and southwest monsoons, crab larvae may be dispersed by surface currents (Fig 1) along the coast from the Gulf of Tonkin up to the Gulf of Thailand and vice versa. However, all analyses revealed the consistent patterns of non-connectivity from the south to the remaining P. pelagicus populations.
The Vietnamese coastline in the East Sea is influenced by seasonally complex water circulations, which result in upwelling and anticyclonic/cyclonic eddies along the south and central coasts [3,4,89]. In general, eddies may limit larval dispersal, acting as a larval retention system [90,91] and maintaining divergence in marine populations [92]. Winds, together with tidal and Mekong river discharge (6000–12000 m3/s) [93,94] were reported as the factors involved in the upwelling, and separate currents in the southern shelf of Vietnam. That may further well explain restricted gene flow in the southern population. Analyses of contemporary gene flow demonstrated the limited genetic exchange in P. pelagicus from the south, while the extensive migration occurring along the northern and central coasts. The migration relative rate (Nm) indicated 10 fold greater migration between northern and central populations than from these sites to the south. What makes this more interesting is that significant asymmetric migration from northern to central populations (S1 Fig). Monsoon-induced currents and eddies reported in the central coast [3] make the central region a potential population sink. In contrast, estimates of historical gene flow provided strong evidence for a single panmictic population. This may indicate historical patterns of connectivity were different to those detected today. Vietnamese coasts are currently undergoing dramatic changes due to human activities that heavily affect ecosystems and organisms [1,2]. These human induced disturbances such as overexploitation and habitat degradation/fragmentation as well as coastal pollution may prevent larval transport and dispersal by inducing broad-scale larval mortality [33] and obstructing adult migration [28,95], which may be one of the leading causes of current population isolation.
In term of genetic diversity, the lowest value was detected in the southern population, in concordance with high inbreeding coefficient (0.265) as well as related pairs (Table 2). This heterozygosity deficiency is also recorded in P. pelagicus populations in Malaysia [50], and in other marine and freshwater organisms due to widespread habitat loss, degradation and fragmentation [32,96,97]. Significant relatedness and sib-ships have been observed in marine populations due to biophysical larval behavior [98,99], self-recruitment [31,100], and overexploitation/restocking [101]. Kien Giang was the main harvested area of P. pelagicus in Vietnam, high level of inbreeding and relatedness, and significant genetic differentiation may indicate that local recruitment originates from a limited pool of successful reproductive adults, and reflect somewhat the pressure of overexploitation on crab populations.
This was the first study to apply the powerful technique of over a hundred SNP markers to infer the natural and/or manmade barriers to gene flow in Portunus pelagicus. The population structure of P. pelagicus in the current study does not show high connectivity like other organisms such as lobster [29] and giant clams [53], shown using mitochondrial makers. According to Lemopoulos et al. (2018) [102], RADseq-generate SNPs outperformed microsatellites (and possibly other markers) for investigating individual‐level genotypes, and can be applied to studies of small-scale population structure such as the swimming crab in Vietnam. Looking at the swimming crab in the Indo-Pacific region overall, different patterns and levels of genetic structure of P. pelagicus have been detected, such as significant genetic differentiation [44,45,47] as well as high gene flow [50,51]. Highly restricted gene flow is mainly reported due to geographic distributions (even at a fine scale) [46], while connectivity is explained by adult migration (such as for spawning), larval dispersal [42], and a lack of physical barriers in the marine environment [50]. In case of Vietnamese P. pelagicus, the complex natural and anthropogenic biophysical factors may be driving restricted gene flow along the coastline. However, closely related individuals found in the southern population may affect current results such as reducing the sample size (in the case of related individuals removed), or creating an artificial population structure (when included related pairs). However, the two data sets analyses give the same structure, so we can also confirm an accurate reflection of results for a true phenomenon in this species. P. pelagicus can therefore be considered two fisheries and conservation management units. The factors driving current connectivity patterns of P. pelagicus are complex, and cannot accurately be identified. P. pelagicus is likely at risk from inbreeding and subpopulation isolation, and subsequently poor adaptive potential. The management for this species should be careful to ensure that overfishing and habitat degradation do not further affect the vitality of existing populations. Immediate actions such as a seasonal ban on catching crabs in the autumn and late summer to increase successful spawning [32], establishment of marine reserves to reduce genetic losses [101], and coastal pollution control to increase numbers of breeding individuals and larval dispersal [28,33]. Moreover, gear regulation, habitat monitoring and restoration might be one of the most effective ways to manage healthy populations. The appropriate explanation for the high rate of self-recruitment observed in the southern swimming crab remains open. Periodic surveys on genetic diversity, and seascape research [100] should be conducted to provide an overall temporal and spatial view of crab populations.
This study of P. pelagicus highlighted the important of conservation genetic studies using advanced genomics for information-lacking geographic zones such as Vietnam East Sea. These results also provide important baseline measures of diversity that can be used for future genetic surveys as well as for monitoring responses of P. pelagicus for environmental changes and temperature rises due to climate change.
Supporting information
S1 Fig [nbs]
Illustrate the significant directional asymmetric migration calculated by divMigrate function performed in R package diveRsity.
S1 Table [cw]
Sample sites and size of with successful sequences, pre-analyzed ( assembly, mapping) and analyses of population structure.
S2 Table [docx]
Numbers of . individuals and SNPs following the filtering steps, outlier, Linkage disequilibrium analysis and relatedness.
Zdroje
1. Tran TD. Major issues of coastal environment in Vietnam and orientation for protection. In: Hong PN, editor. The role of mangrove and coral reef ecosystems. Publisher: Agriculture Publishing House, Hanoi; 2006. pp. 1–16.
2. Saito Y, Huy D Van, Tateishi M, Thanh TD, Nguyen VL, Ta TKO. Regimes of human and climate impacts on coastal changes in Vietnam. Reg Environ Chang. 2004;4: 49–62. doi: 10.1007/s10113-003-0062-7
3. Van Ninh P, Quynh DN, Lanh V Van, Viet Lien N. Geostrophic and drift current in the South China Sea, Area IV : Vietnamese waters. SEAFDEC Semin Fish Resour South Chins Sea, Area IV Vietnamese Waters. 2000; 365–373.
4. Pasuya MF, Peter BN, MDA H., Omar KM. Sea surface current in the Gulf of Thailand based on nineteen years altimetric data and GPS tracked drifting buoy. Geomatic & Geospatial Technology Conference. 2016. p. 8.
5. Schmidt-Thomé P, Nguyen TH, Pham TL, Jarva J, Nuottimäki K. Climate change adaptation measures in Vietnam. Springer Briefs Earth Sci. 2015; 7–16. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-12346-2
6. Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bruno JF. The impact of climate change on the world’s marine ecosystems. Science (80-). 2010;328: 1523–1528. doi: 10.1126/science.1189930
7. Kangas MI. Synopsis of the biology and exploitation of the blue swimmer crab, Portunus pelagicus Linnaeus, in Western Australia. Fish. Res. Rep. Fish. West. Aust. 2000.
8. Banks R, Banks R, Holt T. Assessment report for Vietnamese: Blue swimming crab tangle net fishery (Portunus pelagicus), Kien Giang province. 2009.
9. Kunsook C, Gajaseni N, Paphavasit N. A stock assessment of the blue swimming crab Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758) for sustainable management in Kung Krabaen Bay, Gulf of Thailand. Trop Life Sci Res. 2014;25: 41–59.
10. Lai JCY, Ng PKL, Davie PJF. A revision of the Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758) species complex (Crustacea: Brachyura: Portunidae), with the recognition of four species. Raffles Bull Zool. 2010;58: 199–237.
11. Ha VV, Nhan TH, Cuong T Van, Doan NS. Stock and fishery assessment report of blue swimming crab Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Kien Giang waters, Viet Nam. Report for WWF and WASEP. 2014.
12. Canan T, Irem Y. Reproductive biology of the blue swimming crab, Portunus segnis (Forskal, 1775) in Yumurtalık Cove, North-eastern Mediterranean, Turkey. Mediterr Mar Sci. 2017;18: 424–432. http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/mms.13789
13. Ernawati TRI, Sumiono B, Madduppa H. Reproductive ecology, spawning potential, and breeding season of blue swimming crab (Portunidae: Portunus pelagicus) in Java Sea, Indonesia. Biodiversitas. 2017;18: 1705–1713. doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d180451
14. Zairion, Wardiatno Y, Fahrudin A. Sexual maturity, reproductive pattern and spawning female population of the blue swimming crab, Portunus pelagicus (Brachyura: Portunidae) in East Lampung Coastal Waters, Indonesia. Indian J Sci Technol. 2015;8: 596. doi: 10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i6/69368
15. Bryars SR, Havenhand JN. Temporal and spatial distribution and abundance of blue swimmer crab (Portunus pelagicus) larvae in a temperate gulf. Mar Freshw Res. 2004;55: 809–818. doi: 10.1071/MF04045
16. Bryars S. Larval Dispersal of the Blue Swimmer Crab, Portunus Pelagicus (Linnaeus) (Crustacea:Decapoda: Portunidae), in South Australia. Flinders University of South Australia. 1997.
17. Kemnaren DD, Zarion, Kamal MM, Wardiatno Y. Abundance and spatial distribution of blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus) larvae during east monsoon in the East Lampung waters, Indonesia. Biodiversitas J Biol Divers. 2018;19: 1326–1333. doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d190420
18. Macale AMB, Alcantara SG, Nieves PM. Density distribution of blue crab (Portunus pelagicus) larvae with implications to the lying-in concept of stock enhancement. Kuroshio Sci. 2017;11: 54–62.
19. Svane I, Hooper G. Blue Swimmer Crab (Portunus pelagicus) Fishery. Fishery Assessment Report to PIRSA for the Blue Crab Fishery Management Committee. 2004.
20. VASEP. Vietnam is the leading supplier of fresh blue swimming crab to Japan. Vietnam Association of Seafood Exporters and Producers report, 09/2013. [http://www.seafood.vasep.com.vn/Daily-News/378_8240/Vietnam-is-the-leading-supplier-of-fresh-blue-swimming-crab-to-Japan.htm]. 2013.
21. FAO. Species Fact Sheets Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758) Fisheries. Fisheries and Aquaculture Department. 2016.
22. Ha VV, Nhan TH, Cuong TV, Doan NS. Stock and fishery assessment report of blue swimming crab Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Kien Giang waters, Viet Nam. 2015.
23. Seafood Watch Consulting Researcher. Blue swimming crab Vietnam and Gulf of Thailand Bottom gillnet, Pots, Set gillnet, Traps. 2018.
24. Berger AM, Goethel DR, Lynch PD, Quinn II T, Mormede S, McKenzie J, et al. Space oddity: The mission for spatial integration. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2017;74: 1698–1716. doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2017-0150
25. Kerr LA, Hintzen NT, Cadrin SX, Clausen LW, Dickey-Collas M, Goethel DR, et al. Lessons learned from practical approaches to reconcile mismatches between biological population structure and stock units of marine fish. ICES J Mar Sci. 2017;74: 1708–1722. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsw188
26. Kritzer JP, Liu OR. Fishery management strategies for addressing complex spatial structure in marine fish stocks. In: Cadrin S. X., Kerr SM L. A., editor. Stock identification methods: Applications in Ffshery science. Second Edi. Academic Press, San Diego, California; 2014. pp. 29–57. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-397003-9.00003–5
27. Reiss H, Hoarau G, Dickey-Collas M, Wolff WJ. Genetic population structure of marine fish: Mismatch between biological and fisheries management units. Fish Fish. 2009;10: 361–395. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00324.x
28. Cimmaruta R, Scialanca F, Luccioli F, Nascetti G. Genetic diversity and environmental stress in Italian populations of the cyprinodont fish Aphanius fasciatus. Oceanol Acta. 2003;26: 101–110. doi: 10.1016/S0399-1784(02)01234-3
29. Dao HT, Smith-keune C, Wolanski E, Jones CM. Oceanographic currents and local ecological knowledge indicate, and genetics does not refute, a Contemporary pattern of larval dispersal for The ornate spiny lobster, Panulirus ornatus in the South-East Asian Archipelago. PLoS One. 2015;10: 1–19. 110.1371/journal.pone.0124568
30. Dang BT, Vu QHD, Biesack EE, Doan T V., Truong OT, Tran TL, et al. Population genomics of the peripheral freshwater fish Polynemus melanochir (Perciformes, Polynemidae) in a changing Mekong Delta. Conserv Genet. 2019; doi: 10.1007/s10592-019-01157-5
31. Truelove NK, Kough AS, Behringer DC, Paris CB, Box SJ, Preziosi RF, et al. Biophysical connectivity explains population genetic structure in a highly dispersive marine species. Coral Reefs. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2017;36: 233–244. doi: 10.1007/s00338-016-1516-y
32. Nehemia A, Kochzius M. Reduced genetic diversity and alteration of gene flow in a fiddler crab due to mangrove degradation. PLoS One. 2017;12: 1–20. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182987
33. Puritz JB, Toonen RJ. Coastal pollution limits pelagic larval dispersal. Nat Commun. Nature Publishing Group; 2011;2: 226–228. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1238 21407192
34. Hamilton PB, Cowx IG, Oleksiak MF, Griffiths AM, Grahn M, Stevens JR, et al. Population-level consequences for wild fish exposed to sublethal concentrations of chemicals–a critical review. FFish Fish. 2016;17: 545–566. doi: 10.1111/faf.12125
35. Kenchington EL. The effects of fishing on species and genetic diversity. In: Sinclair M, Valdimarson G, editors. Responsible fisheries in the marine ecosystem. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK; 2003. pp. 253–272. doi: 10.1079/9780851996332.0235
36. Smith P. Genetic diversity of marine fisheries resources: possible impacts of fishing. FAO Fisheries Technical paper No. 344. Rome, FAO. 1994.
37. Hutchings JA RJ. Marine fish population collapses: consequences for recovery and extinction risk. Bioscience. 2004;54: 297–309. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0297:MFPCCF]2.0.CO;2
38. Peterson BK, Weber JN, Kay EH, Fisher HS, Hoekstra HE. Double digest RADseq: An inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species. PLoS One. 2012;7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037135
39. Al-Breiki RD, Kjeldsen SR, Afzal H, Al Hinai MS, Zenger KR, Jerry DR, et al. Genome-wide SNP analyses reveal high gene flow and signatures of local adaptation among the scalloped spiny lobster (Panulirus homarus) along the Omani coastline. BMC Genomics. BMC Genomics; 2018;19: 1DUMMY. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5044-8
40. Vigouroux R, Roussel J-M, Lassalle G, Longin G, Rinaldo R, Barloy D, et al. A cost-and-time effective procedure to develop SNP markers for multiple species: A support for community genetics. Methods Ecol Evol. 2018;9: 1959–1974. doi: 10.1111/2041-210x.13034
41. Etter PD, Selker EU, Currey MC, Cresko WA, Baird NA, Atwood TS, et al. Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS One. 2008;3: e3376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003376 18852878
42. Wang S, Meyer E, Mckay JK, Matz M V. 2b-RAD: A simple and flexible method for genome-wide genotyping. Nat Methods. 2012;9: 808–810. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2023 22609625
43. Bird CE, Andrews KR, Fernandez-Silva I, Forsman ZH, Toonen RJ, Puritz JB, et al. ezRAD: a simplified method for genomic genotyping in non-model organisms. PeerJ. 2013;1: e203. doi: 10.7717/peerj.203 24282669
44. Yap ES, Sezmis E, Chaplin JA, Potter IC, Spencer PBS. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in Portunus pelagicus (Crustacea: Portunidae). Mol Ecol Notes. 2002;2: 30–32. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-8286.2002.00136.x
45. Sezmiş E. The population genetic structure of Portunus pelagicus in Australian waters. Ph.D thesis, Murdoch University, Australia. 2004.
46. Klinbunga S, Khetpu K, Khamnamtong B, Menasveta P. Genetic heterogeneity of the blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus) in Thailand determined by AFLP analysis. Biochem Genet. 2007;45: 725–736. doi: 10.1007/s10528-007-9110-1 17879155
47. Klinbunga S, Yuvanatemiya V, Wongphayak S, Khetpu K, Menasveta P, Khamnamtong B. Genetic population differentiation of the blue swimming crab Portunus pelagicus (Portunidae) in Thai waters revealed by RAPD analysis. Genet Mol Res. 2010;9: 1615–1624. doi: 10.4238/vol9-3gmr886 20730713
48. Ren G, Miao G, Ma C, Lu J, Yang X, Ma H. Genetic structure and historical demography of the blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus) from southeastern sea of China based on mitochondrial COI gene. Mitochondrial DNA Part A DNA Mapping, Seq Anal. Informa UK Ltd.; 2018;29: 192–198. doi: 10.1080/24701394.2016.1261855
49. Sienes PMQ, Willette DA, Romena LR, Alvior CG, Estacion JS, Malay MCD. Genetic diversity and the discovery of a putative cryptic species within a valued crab fishery, Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus 1758), in the Philippines. Philipp Sci Lett. 2014;7: 317–323.
50. Chai CJ, Esa Y Bin, Ismail MFS, Kamarudin MS. Population structure of Portunus pelagicus in coastal areas of Malaysia inferred from microsatellites. Zool Stud. 2017;56: 1–12. doi: 10.6620/ZS.2017.56–26
51. Andi IA, Andi T, Andi AH, Yushinta F, Andi P. High genetic variation of Portunus pelagicus from Makassar Straits revealed by RAPD markers and mitochondrial 16S rRNA sequences. African J Biotechnol. 2016;15: 180–190. doi: 10.5897/ajb2015.15045
52. Yang X, You C, Wang S, Miao G, Shi X, Wu Q, et al. Isolation and characterization of 91 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers for the blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus). Conserv Genet Resour. Springer Netherlands; 2017;9: 549–556. doi: 10.1007/s12686-017-0720-6
53. Nguyen TAT, Dang TB, Chau TML. A study of genetic structure of giant clam (Tridacna spp.) (Tridacninae) population in south central and southern Vietnam’s coast. J Biol. 2014;36 (1se): 189–194.
54. Puritz JB, Hollenbeck CM, Gold JR. dDocent : a RADseq, variant-calling pipeline designed for population genomics of non-model organisms. PeerJ. 2014;2: e431. doi: 10.7717/peerj.431 24949246
55. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30: 2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 24695404
56. Chong Z, Ruan J, Wu CI. Rainbow: An integrated tool for efficient clustering and assembling RAD-seq reads. Bioinformatics. 2012;28: 2732–2737. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts482 22942077
57. Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W. CD-HIT: Accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28: 3150–3152. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 23060610
58. Li W, Godzik A. Cd-hit: A fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2006;22: 1658–1659. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 16731699
59. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25: 1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 19451168
60. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2010;26: 589–595. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698 20080505
61. Li H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. Oxford Univ Press 2013. 2013;00: 1–3. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0352-y
62. Wysoker A, Fennell T, Marth G, Abecasis G, Ruan J, Li H, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25: 2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 19505943
63. Garrison E, Marth G. Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing [Internet]. 2012. pp. 1–9. arXiv:1207.3907
64. Banks E, Lunter G, Albers CA, Durbin R, Danecek P, Auton A, et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics. 2011;27: 2156–2158. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330 21653522
65. Foll M, Gaggiotti O. A genome-scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both dominant and codominant markers: A Bayesian perspective. Genetics. 2008;180: 977–993. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.092221 18780740
66. Benajmini Y, Hochberg Y, Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate : A Practical and powerful approach to Multiple Testing. J R Stat Soc B. 1995;57: 289–300. doi: 10.2307/2346101
67. Gregory W., Gregor G. FL and MM. Genetics: Population Genetics. R package version 1.3.8.1.1 [Internet]. 2019. Available: https://cran.r-project.org/package=genetics
68. Kemppainen P, Hlaing T, Walton C, Somboon P, Knight CG, Mahanta J, et al. Linkage disequilibrium network analysis (LDna) gives a global view of chromosomal inversions, local adaptation and geographic structure. Mol Ecol Resour. 2015;15: 1031–1045. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12369 25573196
69. Csardi G. NT. The igraph software package for complex network research, InterJournal, Complex Systems 1695. http://igraph.org; 2006.
70. Peakall R, Smouse PE. GenALEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics. 2012;28: 2537–2539. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460 22820204
71. Meirmans Patrick G., Tienderen VH. GENOTYPE and GENODIVE : two programs for the analysis of genetic diversity of asexual organisms. Mol Ecol Notes. 2004;4: 792–794. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00770.x
72. Pew J, Muir PH, Wang J, Frasier TR. related: An R package for analysing pairwise relatedness from codominant molecular markers. Mol Ecol Resour. 2015;15: 557–561. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12323 25186958
73. Milligan BG. Maximum-likelihood estimation of relatedness. Genetics. 2003;163: 1153–1167. doi: 10.4289/0013-8797-112.1.1 12663552
74. Wang J. Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness. Genet Res. 2007;89: 135–153. doi: 10.1017/S0016672307008798 17894908
75. Waples RS, Anderson EC. Purging putative siblings from population genetic data sets: A cautionary view. Mol Ecol. 2017;26: 1211–1224. doi: 10.1111/mec.14022 28099771
76. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinforma. 2017;1: 117693430500100. doi: 10.1177/117693430500100003
77. Hubisz MJ, Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol Ecol Resour. 2009;9: 1322–1332. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02591.x 21564903
78. Daniel Falush MS and JKP. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: Linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics. 2003;164: 1567–1587. 12930761
79. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14: 2611–2620. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x 15969739
80. Earl DA, vonHoldt BM. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour. 2012;4: 359–361. doi: 10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7
81. Jombart T, Ahmed I. adegenet 1.3–1: New tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics. 2011;27: 3070–3071. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr521 21926124
82. Beerli P, Felsenstein J. Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98: 4563–456. doi: 10.1073/pnas.081068098 11287657
83. Chiucchi JE, Gibbs HL. Similarity of contemporary and historical gene flow among highly fragmented populations of an endangered rattlesnake. Mol Ecol. 2010;19: 5345–5358. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04860.x 20964755
84. Beerli P. How to use M IGRATE or why are Markov chain Monte Carlo programs difficult to use? Bertorelle G, Bruford MW, Hauffe HC, Rizzoli A, Vernesi (eds) Population genetics for animal conservation. The Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 2009. pp. 42–79.
85. Sundqvist L, Keenan K, Zackrisson M, Prodöhl P, Kleinhans D. Directional genetic differentiation and relative migration. Ecol Evol. 2016;6: 3461–3475. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2096 27127613
86. Keenan K., McGinnity P., Cross T.F., Crozier W.W., & Prodöhl PA. DiveRsity: An R package for the estimation of population genetics parameters and their associated errors. Methods Ecol Evol. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=genetics; 2013;4: 782–788. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12067
87. Epskamp S, Cramer AOJ, Waldorp LJ, Schmittmann VD, Borsboom D. qgraph : Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. J Stat Softw. 2012;48: 1–18. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i04
88. Moore JS, Bourret V, Dionne M, Bradbury I, O’Reilly P, Kent M, et al. Conservation genomics of anadromous Atlantic salmon across its North American range: Outlier loci identify the same patterns of population structure as neutral loci. Mol Ecol. 2014;23: 5680–5697. doi: 10.1111/mec.12972 25327895
89. Chen C, Lai Z, Beardsley RC, Xu Q, Lin H, Viet NT. Current separation and upwelling over the southeast shelf of Vietnam in the South China Sea. J Geophys Res. 2012;117: C03033. doi: 10.1029/2011JC007150
90. Morgan SG, Fisher JL, Miller SH, McAfee ST, Largier JL. Nearshore larval retention in a region of strong upwelling and recruitment limitation. Ecology. 2009;90: 3489–3502. doi: 10.1890/08-1550.1 20120816
91. Condie S, Condie R. Retention of plankton within ocean eddies. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2016;25: 1264–1277. doi: 10.1111/geb.12485
92. Pineda J, Hare J, Sponaugle S. Larval transport and dispersal in the coastal ocean and consequences for population connectivity. Oceanography. 2011;20: 22–39. doi: 10.5670/oceanog.2007.27
93. Hung NN, Delgado JM, Tri VK, Hung LM, Merz B, Bárdossy A, et al. Floodplain hydrology of the mekong delta, Vietnam. Hydrol Process. 2012;26: 674–686. doi: 10.1002/hyp.8183
94. Tri VK. Hydrology and hydraulic infrastructure systems in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Renaud F, Kuenzer C The Mekong Delta System Springer Environmental Science and Engineering. Dordrecht: Springer; 2012. pp. 49–81. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-39-62_3
95. Gonzalez EB, Knutsen H, Jorde PE. Habitat discontinuities separate genetically divergent populations of a rocky shore marine fish. PLoS One. 2016;11. doi: 10.5061/dryad.4g349.Funding
96. Yuhara T, Kawane M, Furota T. Genetic population structure of local populations of the endangered saltmarsh sesarmid crab Clistocoeloma sinense in Japan. PLoS One. 2014;9: 1–9. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084720
97. Ackiss AS, Dang BT, Bird CE, Biesack EE, Chheng P, Phounvisouk L, et al. Cryptic lineages and a population dammed to incipient extinction? Insights into the genetic structure of a Mekong River catfish. J Hered. 535–547. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esz016
98. Aglieri G, Papetti C, Zane L, Milisenda G, Boero F, Piraino S. First evidence of inbreeding, relatedness and chaotic genetic patchiness in the holoplanktonic jellyfish Pelagia noctiluca (Scyphozoa, Cnidaria). PLoS One. 2014;9. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099647
99. Riesgo A, Taboada S, Pérez-Portela R, Melis P, Xavier JR, Blasco G, et al. Genetic diversity, connectivity and gene flow along the distribution of the emblematic Atlanto-Mediterranean sponge Petrosia ficiformis (Haplosclerida, Demospongiae). BMC Evol Biol. BMC Evolutionary Biology; 2019;19: 1–18. doi: 10.1186/s12862-018-1333-8
100. Teske PR, Sandoval-Castillo J, Van Sebille E, Waters J, Beheregaray LB. Oceanography promotes self-recruitment in a planktonic larval disperser. Sci Rep. Nature Publishing Group; 2016;6: 1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41598-016-0001-8
101. Munguía-Vega A, Sáenz-Arroyo A, Greenley AP, Espinoza-Montes JA, Palumbi SR, Rossetto M, et al. Marine reserves help preserve genetic diversity after impacts derived from climate variability: Lessons from the pink abalone in Baja California. Glob Ecol Conserv. Elsevier B.V.; 2015;4: 264–276. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2015.07.005
102. Lemopoulos A, Prokkola JM, Uusi-Heikkilä S, Vasemägi A, Huusko A, Hyvärinen P, et al. Comparing RADseq and microsatellites for estimating genetic diversity and relatedness—Implications for brown trout conservation. Ecol Evol. 2019;9: 2106–2120. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4905 30847096
Článok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 11
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Nejasný stín na plicích – kazuistika
- Masturbační chování žen v ČR − dotazníková studie
- Úspěšná resuscitativní thorakotomie v přednemocniční neodkladné péči
- Kombinace metamizol/paracetamol v léčbě pooperační bolesti u zákroků v rámci jednodenní chirurgie
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- A daily diary study on maladaptive daydreaming, mind wandering, and sleep disturbances: Examining within-person and between-persons relations
- A 3’ UTR SNP rs885863, a cis-eQTL for the circadian gene VIPR2 and lincRNA 689, is associated with opioid addiction
- A substitution mutation in a conserved domain of mammalian acetate-dependent acetyl CoA synthetase 2 results in destabilized protein and impaired HIF-2 signaling
- Molecular validation of clinical Pantoea isolates identified by MALDI-TOF