#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

The trajectory of patterns of light and sedentary physical activity among females, ages 14-23


Authors: Deborah A. Cohen aff001;  Bing Han aff002;  Lisa Kraus aff002;  Deborah Rohm Young aff003
Authors place of work: Social and Economic Well Being, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, United States of America aff001;  Statistics, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, United States of America aff002;  Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States of America aff003
Published in the journal: PLoS ONE 14(11)
Category: Research Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223737

Summary

Purpose

Light physical activity (LPA) and patterns of sedentary behavior influence cardio-metabolic health independently of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Understanding the trajectory and determinants of these activity levels over time may provide insights relevant to public health practice.

Methods

We measured a cohort of young women recruited in middle school (age 14) using accelerometry for 1 week and remeasured them in high school (age 17) and again at age 23 (n = 385). We assessed changes in LPA and patterns of sedentary behavior by hours in a day. We examined the association of social and contextual factors, including employment status, screen time, and neighborhood context with LPA and sedentary behavior patterns.

Results

The amount of LPA decreased over time, while the length of LPA bouts tended to increase. Sedentary bout durations increased over time and sedentary breaks decreased. Sedentary time and bout length were correlated with internet use, rather than with TV or videogaming. Employment was associated with less sedentary time; being a student was associated with longer sedentary time and bouts.

Conclusions

Because LPA and sedentary breaks can be protective for cardio-metabolic health, and the duration of sedentary bouts increase as women age from adolescence to young adulthood, worksites and college campuses should remind employees and students to take frequent activity breaks when they use computers and the internet for long stretches.

Keywords:

Physical activity – Employment – Behavior – Schools – Internet – Adipose tissue – Walking – Video games

Introduction

While moderate-to-vigorous physical activity is associated with longevity, better health outcomes and reduced prevalence of chronic diseases in adults[1, 2], many studies have also found that light physical activity (LPA)[35] and patterns of sedentary behavior have independent associations with health outcomes[6, 7]. Because patterns of sedentary behavior are not well-correlated with moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, those who otherwise meet physical activity guidelines may still be at risk for cardio-metabolic diseases and higher mortality, if during the rest of the day, they engage in prolonged sedentary behavior [810].

Patterns of activity have been described in terms of duration of uninterrupted bouts, the intensity of bouts, as well as the frequency of breaks in sedentary bouts. Breaks in sedentary behavior and short bouts of sedentary behavior have been associated with reduced cardio-metabolic risk[11] and lower BMI z- scores in children [12] as well as in adults[13, 14]. The duration of sedentary bouts and the frequency of breaks in these bouts appear to correlate with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in both children and adults[15, 16] and with fitness in youth [17]. Adults with more LPA in long bouts had reduced cardiovascular risk compared to adults with longer bouts of sedentary behavior [18].

These physical activity patterns have physiological consequences in that they influence the transfer of glucose from the circulation into muscle cells. Reductions in physical activity over time have been associated with impaired glucose metabolism [19]. While moderate and vigorous physical activity in bouts of 10 minutes or greater are most efficient in stimulating glucose transfer into cells, physiological studies suggest that even incidental light intensity movements or resistance activities in short bouts are also effective in promoting glucose movement into muscle cells [20]. Thus, light physical activity and interruptions of sedentary behavior are important mechanisms that may reduce cardio-metabolic risk [8, 14, 21, 22]. Additional cardiovascular risks can ensue from blood viscosity and clotting factors [23, 24] and blood pressure [2527], which are adversely affected by sedentary behaviors.

Females are particularly at risk of declining physical activity. While physical activity declines among both males and females over time [2830], females get less physical activity than males at all time points ages and are more susceptible to conditions like osteopenia and osteoporosis from which physical activity offers protection [3133]. However, studies have indicated that contextual factors like the design of the built environment is associated with female physical activity, so those who live in more walkable neighborhoods have lower rates of physical activity decline than those who do not [34, 35]. As youth mature, they not only leave home to live in other locations, but they pursue higher education and participate in the work force, which create settings that govern how sedentary and physically active they will be throughout the day.

The trajectory of patterns of sedentary behavior and LPA has not been well-described and there are a limited, but growing number of studies with longitudinal measurements [3639]. This paper reports on activity patterns for a cohort of young women measured three times over a 9-year period.

Methods

The Trial of Activity of Adolescent Girls (TAAG) was a group-randomized, controlled trial to determine if an intervention that linked schools to community organizations reduced the age-related decline in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in middle school girls [40]. We enrolled 730 8th grade girls from TAAG at the Maryland field center in the Baltimore, MD/Washington DC area in the spring of 2006. Of these, 589 (81%) were re-recruited and measured during the girls’ 11th grade year (2009) using the same protocol. Six years later we re-recruited, consented, and measured 460 (63% of the original sample) when they were about 23 years of age. Complete recruitment efforts are described elsewhere [41]. The study was approved by the University of Maryland and the Kaiser Permanente Southern California Institutional Review Boards and included participant assent when the girls were younger than 18 years.

Measures

Physical activity as the primary study outcome was measured objectively with Actigraph accelerometers (MTI model 7164). Participants wore the monitor during most waking hours for seven consecutive days. Data were collected and stored in 30-second intervals. At all measurement periods the same count thresholds were used to determine categories of physical activity intensity: Sedentary< 100/minute; Light: 100–2999; Moderate: 3000–5200; Vigorous: > 5200.[42] We excluded any days with <7.6 hours of wear time, and all participants with < 3 days of accelerometer data. Our sample size was 385, including participants with data at all 3 waves.

Bouts were defined as periods of time uninterrupted by breaks, defined as when a level of activity for at least 2 epochs of 30 seconds (1 minute) exceeded the count threshold and fell into another category of physical activity intensity. Breaks <1 minute were disregarded in the calculation of sedentary bouts. Non-wear time was identified using a series of algorithms examining outliers for dates, wear hours, and total counts, eliminating measures that were outside the study period and those too high or too low to be plausible. All activity counts were time-stamped by day and time of day. We classified sedentary behavior and LPA bouts based on their duration. We also calculated the length of the usual, median and longest bout following the methods of Bellettiere et al.[43] The usual bout length describes the bout duration at which half of the total sedentary time is accumulated, describing the central tendency of time spent in sedentary bouts [43]. In order to compare similar information by time of day across all participants in the cohort, we deleted the days with start time later than 9am or end time earlier than 9pm. This operation removed 0%, 0%, and 3% bout-level data from waves 1–3, respectively. We then examined physical activity over the same 12 hours of each day.

Anthropometry

At age 14 and 17 years, height and weight were objectively measured using a stadiometer and calibrated scale. At age 23 years, participants self-reported their height and weight and we calculated body mass index (BMI) as kg/m2. During data collection at 17 years, we also asked girls to self-report their height and weight. Similar to other studies [44, 45], measured BMI and self-reported BMI were highly correlated (r = 0.96). Skinfold thickness of the triceps was measured on the right side of the body to the nearest millimeter to estimate body fat percentage only at ages 14 and 17.

Screen time was not measured at age 14. At ages 17 and 23, screen time was measured for internet, television, videogames, and participants were asked to estimate the time for weekdays and weekends. For each of the three categories, Computer, TV, videogames, response options were 0, <1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 hours or more. We asked for weekdays and weekends. We transformed these into continuous variables by using 30 minutes for < 1, and for a score ranging from 0–6 for each variable. These times were summed, and weekday times were multiplied by 5, weekend times, multiplied and 2 and the total was divided by 7 to get average daily screen time.

Geospatial calculations

Using ESRI’s ArcMap, all locations for each participant for each wave were geocoded to the street address level, and for each wave, a one-mile buffer was created. All census tract centroids that fell within the one-mile buffer were then included in the output, averaging the values for each wave. For cases where there were no tract centroids located in the one- mile buffer due to participants living in bigger tracts usually due to increased rurality, tracts whose boundaries intersected with the one-mile buffer was used to average the census data. Population density was calculated as the total population count divided by the census tract square mileage. For each survey wave, we used the respective American Community Survey (ACS)[46] tract level data. At age 14 we used the 2005–2009 5-year ACS; at age 17 we used the 2006–2010 5-year ACS and at age 23 we used the 2011–2015 5-year ACS. We obtained the walkability indices for each participant’s address from the WalkScore website.[47]

Statistical analyses

After cleaning the data, we conducted descriptive statistics for all person-level variables over time. We also conducted graphical descriptive statistics visualizing the change in sedentary behavior and LPA patterns throughout the day.

We fitted a set of repeated measure regression models. We did not control for the initial TAAG study arm, since there were no differences in the parent TAAG study between the intervention and comparison groups. The outcomes included sedentary behavior (daily time spent in bouts with 1+ minutes and 20+ minutes; daily longest, median bouts, and usual bouts; # breaks) and LPA (daily time spent in bouts with 1+ minutes and 10+ minutes; daily longest, median, and usual bouts). The predictors included individual characteristics (race, age at baseline, employment status, student status, BMI) and neighborhood characteristics (walkability score, population density, household poverty rate). Effects of variables only collected in two waves (e.g., objectively measured BMI only measured in first two waves and employment status only measured in waves 2 and 3, ages 17 and 23) were estimated using two waves of data. Random effects were applied to adjust for within-person correlations over time. All inferences were based on robust standard errors to account for potential heteroskedasticity in some outcomes. All models were fitted by PROC MIXED in SAS 9.4.

Results

Population description

Table 1 describes population characteristics, sedentary behavior and LPA. Participants were of diverse backgrounds, with 48% white, 20% African American, 14% Hispanic, and 18% Asian or other race/ethnicity at baseline. The race/ethnicity of the population who were followed up at wave 3 were not different from those who dropped out after wave 2.[48] The percentage of participants who were overweight or obese increased over time, as did the average BMI. Body fat increased between ages 14 and 17. While all the participants were students at 14 and 17, only 40% were students at age 23. Full or part-time employment increased from ages 17 to 23 from 38% to 79%. The neighborhood Walk Score also increased over time, as did the neighborhood population density, reflecting more participants moving to more walkable neighborhoods over time. Average screen time, measured at 17 and 23, increased, with the largest increase in internet time, growing from 2 hours per day to nearly 4 hours per day. The average time spent playing video games dropped from about 20 minutes/day to 15 minutes/day.

Tab. 1. Population characteristics and LPA and SED behaviors by age.
Population characteristics and LPA and SED behaviors by age.

From ages 14–23, the total sedentary behavior did not show a clear trend (Table 1). The time spent in all sedentary bouts (1+ minute) first increased and then decreased. However, time spent in longer sedentary bouts (10+, 15+, and 20+ minutes) tended to increase continuously. Likewise, the daily longest, median, and usual bouts all increased in length from wave 1 to 3. Fig 1 illustrates the daily sedentary behavior across the hours of the day. The patterns of sedentary behavior are similar in waves 1 and 2, when participants were students in middle and high schools. Here the time spent in bouts of a certain length peaked in the morning and decreased in the afternoon and increased again in night time. In wave 3, the pattern differed. The time spent in 1+ minute sedentary bouts was flat during the daytime and decreased at night time. However, the time spent in longer bouts (e.g, 10+, or 20+ minutes), was generally increasing throughout the day. The difference in daily patterns between ages 13 and 17 and the last measurement at 23 is most obvious in longer bouts, e.g, 15+ and 20+ minutes.

Fig. 1.
Mean sedentary minutes by bouts in different lengths for each hour between 9 am and 9 pm: Age 14 (black), Age 17 (red), Age 23 (blue). Dashed lines represent the 95% confidence band.

Compared with sedentary bouts, bouts of LPA were relatively uncommon, decreased over time, and totaled 60% less time than sedentary behavior (Table 1). Across all waves, most LPA time was accumulated in shorter bouts (<5 minutes). Paradoxically, the time spent in longer LPA bouts of 10 or more minutes may have increased slightly at age 23. Fig 2 shows LPA time graphed across the hours of the day. As the length of LPA bouts increase over time, the average minutes per bout decreases, because so few participants engage in long bouts of LPA. For example, at wave 3, only 40% of girls had any LPA bouts longer than 10 minutes between 3 and 4pm. At the person-day level, only 12% of person-days had recorded LPA bouts longer than 10 minutes.

Fig. 2. Mean light PA minutes by bouts in different lengths for each hour between 9am and 9 pm: Age 14 (black), Age 17 (red), Age 23 (blue).
Mean light PA minutes by bouts in different lengths for each hour between 9am and 9 pm: Age 14 (black), Age 17 (red), Age 23 (blue).
Dashed lines represent the 95% confidence band.

LPA was almost identical at 14 and 17 except that at age 17, LPA was shifted downward in every graph, indicating less LPA time. At ages 14 and 17 all bout durations of LPA increased from 9 am to 3 pm, while at age 23, LPA was relatively constant between 9 and 3 pm. For all three waves, all bout durations of LPA decreased from 3 pm to 9 pm. Wave 3 was also unique in that before 3 pm, participants engaged in more longer LPA bouts.

Correlates of sedentary activity bouts and breaks

After controlling for demographic variables, the strongest predictor of changes in sedentary behavior was aging, with the adjusted results the same as the non-adjusted. There was only one significant association between sedentary behavior and race/ethnicity, with African-American women having shorter median sedentary bout duration (Table 2).

Tab. 2. Models estimating associations with sedentary behavior patterns (standard error).
Models estimating associations with sedentary behavior patterns (standard error).

By the third wave of data collection, the average Walk Score increased, as many participants had moved to more urbanized areas, like New York City.[35] Although the Walk Score was associated with longer usual and median sedentary bouts, the effect size was small, such that living in a highly walkable neighborhood like the Upper West Side of Manhattan (Walk Score = 97) would be associated with only 46 seconds longer duration of the usual sedentary bout length, compared to living in a much less walkable neighborhood, for example, living in a suburb like Bethesda, MD, (a Washington, DC suburb) where the Walk Score is 46.

BMI assessed at Waves 1 and 2 was not associated with any sedentary bout patterns, although self-reported BMI, assessed at Wave 3, was associated with a shorter duration of the longest sedentary bout.

Employment was associated with fewer sedentary bouts as well as a shorter duration of the median and longest sedentary bout. In contrast, being a student was associated with more sedentary time, longer bouts with the longest bout being 3 minutes longer than among participants who were not students.

Screen time was also associated with more sedentary bouts. Internet screen time was associated with sedentary breaks, but television viewing and videogaming were not. The longest sedentary bout of a young woman with 5 hours of internet time/day would be 18 minutes longer and she would have 54 fewer breaks in sedentary behavior compared to that of someone with 2 hours of internet time/ day. In addition, time spent in sedentary bouts > 20 minutes’ duration would increase by 1 hour and 48 minutes compared to the person with just 2 hours of internet time per day.

Correlates of light physical activity

The correlates of LPA bouts were similar to those of sedentary bouts, with aging being the strongest correlate (Table 3), again with the adjusted estimates not being different from the non-adjusted ones.

Tab. 3. Models estimating associations with patterns of light physical activity (standard error).
Models estimating associations with patterns of light physical activity (standard error).

There were also few correlates of race/ethnicity; a difference of 4 seconds lower average median LPA bout length was found for young African-American women compared with White women. Walk Score had a positive association with LPA, such that a person living in NYC would only enjoy an average of 1 minute longer usual bout length of LPA, and 6 seconds longer median bout length compared to the same person living in Bethesda, MD.

There were no associations between LPA and measured body fat or BMI at ages 14 or 17. However, at age 23, a person who is 5 BMI units heavier (roughly 11 kgs), the longest LPA bout duration would be about 1 minute shorter than for a person 11 kgs lighter.

Associations between LPA and internet time were stronger than those of TV or videogames, although all three had some influence on LPA bouts. Internet time was associated with less total LPA, so that an additional hour of internet translates to 54 fewer minutes of daily LPA. Paradoxically, internet time also increased the usual and median LPA bout lengths as well as the longest bout of LPA, by 18 seconds, 21 seconds and 5 minutes, respectively. Videogames were associated with longer usual LPA bouts and the duration of the longest LPA bouts, while TV time was associated with more LPA time in bouts of 10 or more minutes, about 18 additional minutes per day for every additional hour of TV watched.

Employment was associated with more LPA time, but lower median and a shorter duration of the longest LPA bouts. Being a student reduced total LPA time, but increased the usual bout and the daily longest bout of LPA.

Discussion

This study provides more evidence on increasing levels of sedentary behavior and reductions in LPA associated with young women aging from ages 14–23, and how the patterns of bouts of sedentary behavior are correlated with individual, social and contextual factors. Although our observations span age 14 to 23, it is likely that the increase in sedentary bout duration starts earlier in childhood, and may be related to school entry, as children sit at desks for a large percentage of the day.

Although it may seem obvious that being a student lends itself to sedentary behavior, it was also surprising to see that employed young women engaged in less sedentary behavior and more LPA than students. Although we consider most modern employment sedentary, it’s possible that the jobs the participants had may not have been fully sedentary. As young women, they likely would have had entry-level jobs, or may have had part-time work in service industries requiring them to be on their feet, e.g. in sales or food service.

Although studies show a strong association between neighborhood environments and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), other studies, including ours, find small associations between neighborhoods environments and sedentary behavior. It appears that indoor environments, such as internet-accessible places, may be more important than urban design in influencing patterns of sedentary behavior. It is possible that having wi-fi more available in outdoor settings, like public parks could influence the frequency with which people engage in active transport, even if they are sedentary at the destination [49]. Further, greater investment in public spaces, destinations, activities and events that are appealing could draw people outdoors where they may be less likely to be sedentary and/or have shorter sedentary bouts.

The domination of the internet among the screen time categories and its association with sedentary behavior and lower LPA is worrisome, particularly as the time spent on the internet increased substantially with age. Because using the internet is a task that is so engrossing, requiring interaction with the screen, we speculate that it may be difficult for people to multi-task while using it. In contrast, people can move around and even exercise while they watch TV. For example, exercise treadmills often have screens, but prevent interaction with the screen when the treadmill speed exceeds a moderate pace. Indeed, there was more longer bouts of LPA associated with TV viewing than with other types of screen time. Although previous studies have shown that TV viewing has negative consequences on moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [50, 51] for young women the internet appears to be a worse screen option than television.

However, although our study spans a longer time period, the findings of our U.S. study are quite similar to others around the world following youth over time. The EU childhood obesity project measured sedentary behavior and found that minutes of sedentary behavior increased from 299 minutes/day at age 6 to 332 min/day at age 8 to 406 min/day at age 11, while light PA also declined [38]. The UK’s Avon Longitudinal study measured youth at ages 12, 14 and 15 and showed that as sedentary behavior increased at each measurement point, light physical activity decreased commensurately [52]. Even shorter longitudinal studies, like a small Finnish study of 258 children with a 2-year follow-up showed that increases in sedentary behavior coupled with declines in MVPA were associated with increased cardiometabolic risks; however, LPA had weaker associations [36].

Limitations

Accelerometers cannot provide information about what people are doing when they are sedentary. We don’t know whether participants were multi-tasking, watching TV, talking on the phone, playing video games, writing emails and/or studying. We did not use a time use tool that would have documented activities on an hourly basis.[53] We do have some general information about such activities that were reported by participants, however self-report, is subject to multiple biases. We narrowed our analysis to 12 hours of the day, so we could combine similar times of day among the participants. However, this means that our findings may not be generalizable to the hours before 9 am or after 9 pm. Second, several participants had short periods of missing data. Previous studies have imputed missing data as a summary of daily physical activity, and not on a minute-to-minute basis. We are unaware of techniques that could accurately impute missing sedentary bout lengths or breaks. In addition, the population was limited to a cohort of young women from the Baltimore/DC areas, so the results may not be generalizable to the general population of young women from other geographic regions of the US.

Conclusion

The increase of longer sedentary bouts and the decline in breaks and in total light physical activity begins at a young age among females. As the girls mature, sedentary behavior appears to be strongly associated with internet time and being a student, with some protection by employment. This suggests that interventions to mitigate the increase in sedentary behavior as well as the increased duration of sedentary bouts need to be promoted in association with educational institutions, worksites and most importantly, with internet service providers. Educational institutions beyond high school should consider adopting policies that could mitigate the sedentariness promoted by study and accompanying internet use, including requiring some physical activity.

Additional strategies to reduce sedentary time should be tested. Employers also have a positive role to play. Some worksites already incorporate LPA as a part of the job, but others could promote more LPA during breaks or to interrupt other work periods that require long periods of immobility. Internet providers could automatically send messages to nudge users to take activity breaks every 20–30 minutes. A review of interventions to reduce sedentary time found that environmental interventions had the largest reductions, but worksites were able to reduce sedentary time an average of 30 minutes/day [54].

Although our measure of the walkability of the neighborhood built environments appeared to have a small association with sedentary behavior and LPA, it is still likely that environments with more opportunities for active transport could have a greater impact on both of these types of behavior.

The trends for increasing sedentary behavior with age is a significant societal challenge that will require recognition of how early the problems begin and then action on multiple levels in order to promote optimal health.

Supporting information

S1 Table [docx]
Algorithms used to calculate non-wear time.


Zdroje

1. Gay JL, Buchner DM, Schmidt MD. Dose-response association of physical activity with HbA1c: Intensity and bout length. Prev Med. 2016;86:58–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.01.008 26827616.

2. McGuire KA, Ross R. Incidental physical activity is positively associated with cardiorespiratory fitness. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(11):2189–94. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821e4ff2 21502894.

3. Robson J, Janssen I. Intensity of bouted and sporadic physical activity and the metabolic syndrome in adults. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1437. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1437 26644978; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4671153.

4. Dowd KP, Harrington DM, Hannigan A, Donnelly AE. Light-intensity physical activity is associated with adiposity in adolescent females. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(12):2295–300. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000357 24797308.

5. Dempsey PC, Sacre JW, Larsen RN, Straznicky NE, Sethi P, Cohen ND, et al. Interrupting prolonged sitting with brief bouts of light walking or simple resistance activities reduces resting blood pressure and plasma noradrenaline in type 2 diabetes. Journal of hypertension. 2016;34(12):2376–82. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001101 27512975.

6. Wullems JA, Verschueren SM, Degens H, Morse CI, Onambele GL. A review of the assessment and prevalence of sedentarism in older adults, its physiology/health impact and non-exercise mobility counter-measures. Biogerontology. 2016;17(3):547–65. doi: 10.1007/s10522-016-9640-1 26972899; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4889631.

7. O'Donoghue G, Perchoux C, Mensah K, Lakerveld J, van der Ploeg H, Bernaards C, et al. A systematic review of correlates of sedentary behaviour in adults aged 18–65 years: a socio-ecological approach. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:163. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2841-3 26887323; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4756464.

8. Lyden K, Keadle SK, Staudenmayer J, Braun B, Freedson PS. Discrete features of sedentary behavior impact cardiometabolic risk factors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(5):1079–86. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000499 25202848; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4362844.

9. Katzmarzyk PT, Church TS, Craig CL, Bouchard C. Sitting time and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(5):998–1005. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181930355 19346988.

10. Ekelund U, Steene-Johannessen J, Brown WJ, Fagerland MW, Owen N, Powell KE, et al. Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1302–10. Epub 2016/08/01. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30370-1 27475271.

11. Bailey DP, Charman SJ, Ploetz T, Savory LA, Kerr CJ. Associations between prolonged sedentary time and breaks in sedentary time with cardiometabolic risk in 10-14-year-old children: The HAPPY study. J Sports Sci. 2017;35(22):2164–71. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1260150 27892780.

12. Saunders TJ, Tremblay MS, Mathieu ME, Henderson M, O'Loughlin J, Tremblay A, et al. Associations of sedentary behavior, sedentary bouts and breaks in sedentary time with cardiometabolic risk in children with a family history of obesity. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e79143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079143 24278117; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3835898.

13. Chastin SF, Buck C, Freiberger E, Murphy M, Brug J, Cardon G, et al. Systematic literature review of determinants of sedentary behaviour in older adults: a DEDIPAC study. The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity. 2015;12:127. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0292-3 26437960; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4595239.

14. Chastin SF, Egerton T, Leask C, Stamatakis E. Meta-analysis of the relationship between breaks in sedentary behavior and cardiometabolic health. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015;23(9):1800–10. doi: 10.1002/oby.21180 26308477.

15. Poitras VJ, Gray CE, Borghese MM, Carson V, Chaput JP, Janssen I, et al. Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(6 Suppl 3):S197–239. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0663 27306431.

16. Honda T, Chen S, Yonemoto K, Kishimoto H, Chen T, Narazaki K, et al. Sedentary bout durations and metabolic syndrome among working adults: a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:888. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3570-3 27562190; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5000401.

17. Judice PB, Silva AM, Berria J, Petroski EL, Ekelund U, Sardinha LB. Sedentary patterns, physical activity and health-related physical fitness in youth: a cross-sectional study. The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity. 2017;14(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0481-3 28259140; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5336686.

18. Vasankari V, Husu P, Vaha-Ypya H, Suni J, Tokola K, Halonen J, et al. Association of objectively measured sedentary behaviour and physical activity with cardiovascular disease risk. European journal of preventive cardiology. 2017;24(12):1311–8. doi: 10.1177/2047487317711048 28530126.

19. Kallio P, Pahkala K, Heinonen OJ, Tammelin T, Hirvensalo M, Telama R, et al. Physical Inactivity from Youth to Adulthood and Risk of Impaired Glucose Metabolism. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(6):1192–8. Epub 2018/01/18. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001555 29337718.

20. Bergouignan A, Latouche C, Heywood S, Grace MS, Reddy-Luthmoodoo M, Natoli AK, et al. Frequent interruptions of sedentary time modulates contraction- and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake pathways in muscle: Ancillary analysis from randomized clinical trials. Scientific reports. 2016;6:32044. doi: 10.1038/srep32044 27554943; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4995429.

21. Cliff DP, Jones RA, Burrows TL, Morgan PJ, Collins CE, Baur LA, et al. Volumes and bouts of sedentary behavior and physical activity: associations with cardiometabolic health in obese children. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014;22(5):E112–8. doi: 10.1002/oby.20698 24788574.

22. Saunders TJ, Larouche R, Colley RC, Tremblay MS. Acute sedentary behaviour and markers of cardiometabolic risk: a systematic review of intervention studies. Journal of nutrition and metabolism. 2012;2012:712435. doi: 10.1155/2012/712435 22754695; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3382951.

23. Lippi G, Maffulli N. Biological influence of physical exercise on hemostasis. Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis. 2009;35(3):269–76. Epub 2009/05/20. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1222605 19452402.

24. Seals DR, Desouza CA, Donato AJ, Tanaka H. Habitual exercise and arterial aging. Journal of applied physiology. 2008;105(4):1323–32. Epub 2008/06/28. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90553.2008 18583377; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2576026.

25. Lissak G. Adverse physiological and psychological effects of screen time on children and adolescents: Literature review and case study. Environmental research. 2018;164:149–57. Epub 2018/03/03. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.015 29499467.

26. Knaeps S, De Baere S, Bourgois J, Mertens E, Charlier R, Lefevre J. Substituting Sedentary Time With Light and Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity is Associated With Better Cardiometabolic Health. Journal of physical activity & health. 2018;15(3):197–203. Epub 2017/09/06. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2017-0102 28872401.

27. Raichlen DA, Pontzer H, Harris JA, Mabulla AZ, Marlowe FW, Josh Snodgrass J, et al. Physical activity patterns and biomarkers of cardiovascular disease risk in hunter-gatherers. Am J Hum Biol. 2017;29(2). Epub 2016/10/11. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.22919 27723159.

28. Farooq MA, Parkinson KN, Adamson AJ, Pearce MS, Reilly JK, Hughes AR, et al. Timing of the decline in physical activity in childhood and adolescence: Gateshead Millennium Cohort Study. British journal of sports medicine. 2018;52(15):1002–6. Epub 2017/03/16. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096933 28288966; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6204977.

29. Dalene KE, Anderssen SA, Andersen LB, Steene-Johannessen J, Ekelund U, Hansen BH, et al. Secular and longitudinal physical activity changes in population-based samples of children and adolescents. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018;28(1):161–71. Epub 2017/03/17. doi: 10.1111/sms.12876 28299832.

30. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U, et al. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):247–57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60646-1 22818937.

31. Katzmarzyk PT, Gledhill N, Shephard RJ. The economic burden of physical inactivity in Canada. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne. 2000;163(11):1435–40. 11192648.

32. McMillan LB, Aitken D, Ebeling P, Jones G, Scott D. The relationship between objectively assessed physical activity and bone health in older adults differs by sex and is mediated by lean mass. Osteoporosis international: a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 2018;29(6):1379–88. Epub 2018/03/14. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4446-4 29532131.

33. McVeigh JA, Zhu K, Mountain J, Pennell CE, Lye SJ, Walsh JP, et al. Longitudinal Trajectories of Television Watching Across Childhood and Adolescence Predict Bone Mass at Age 20 Years in the Raine Study. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2016;31(11):2032–40. Epub 2016/07/06. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2890 27378122.

34. Schipperijn J, Ried-Larsen M, Nielsen MS, Holdt AF, Grontved A, Ersboll AK, et al. A Longitudinal Study of Objectively Measured Built Environment as Determinant of Physical Activity in Young Adults: The European Youth Heart Study. Journal of physical activity & health. 2015;12(7):909–14. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2014-0039 25157562.

35. Cohen DA, Han B, Kraus L, Young DR. The Contribution of the Built Environment to Physical Activity Among Young Women. Environment and Behavior. 2018:0013916517753036. doi: 10.1177/0013916517753036

36. Vaisto J, Haapala EA, Viitasalo A, Schnurr TM, Kilpelainen TO, Karjalainen P, et al. Longitudinal associations of physical activity and sedentary time with cardiometabolic risk factors in children. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019;29(1):113–23. Epub 2018/10/03. doi: 10.1111/sms.13315 30276872; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6485341.

37. Smith L, Aggio D, Hamer M. Longitudinal patterns in objective physical activity and sedentary time in a multi-ethnic sample of children from the UK. Pediatric obesity. 2018;13(2):120–6. Epub 2017/05/26. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12222 28544804; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5811813.

38. Schwarzfischer P, Gruszfeld D, Socha P, Luque V, Closa-Monasterolo R, Rousseaux D, et al. Longitudinal analysis of physical activity, sedentary behaviour and anthropometric measures from ages 6 to 11 years. The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity. 2018;15(1):126. Epub 2018/12/12. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0756-3 30526600; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6286599.

39. Knaeps S, Bourgois JG, Charlier R, Mertens E, Lefevre J, Wijndaele K. Ten-year change in sedentary behaviour, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiometabolic risk: independent associations and mediation analysis. British journal of sports medicine. 2018;52(16):1063–8. Epub 2016/08/06. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096083 27491779; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6089204.

40. Stevens J, Murray DM, Catellier DJ, Hannan PJ, Lytle LA, Elder JP, et al. Design of the Trial of Activity in Adolescent Girls (TAAG). Contemp Clin Trials. 2005;26(2):223–33. Epub 2005/04/20. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2004.12.011 15837442; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1430598.

41. Mohan Y, Cornejo M, Sidell M, Smith J, Young DR. Re-recruiting young adult women into a second follow-up study. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications. 2017;5:160–7. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.02.006 29740632

42. Treuth MS, Schmitz K, Catellier DJ, McMurray RG, Murray DM, Almeida MJ, et al. Defining accelerometer thresholds for activity intensities in adolescent girls. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(7):1259–66. Epub 2004/07/06. 15235335; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2423321.

43. Bellettiere J, Carlson JA, Rosenberg D, Singhania A, Natarajan L, Berardi V, et al. Gender and Age Differences in Hourly and Daily Patterns of Sedentary Time in Older Adults Living in Retirement Communities. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0136161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136161 26296095; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4546658.

44. Brener ND, Kann L, Smith TK. Reliability and validity of the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2000 questionnaires. The Journal of school health. 2003;73(1):29–37. Epub 2003/03/08. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2003.tb06556.x 12621721.

45. Sherry B, Jefferds ME, Grummer-Strawn LM. Accuracy of adolescent self-report of height and weight in assessing overweight status: a literature review. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(12):1154–61. Epub 2007/12/07. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.12.1154 18056560.

46. USCensus. American Community Survey https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/ 2017.

47. Score W. “Walk Score Methodology” https://www.walkscore.com/methodology.shtml 2015 Accessed November 24, 2015.

48. Mohan Y, Cornejo M, Sidell M, Smith J, Young DR. Re-recruiting young adult women into a second follow-up study. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2017;5:160–7. Epub 2017/02/14. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.02.006 29740632; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5936695.

49. Evenson KR, Wen F, Golinelli D, Rodriguez DA, Cohen DA. Measurement Properties of a Park Use Questionnaire. Environ Behav. 2013;45(4):526–47. doi: 10.1177/0013916512436421 23853386.

50. Carson V, Staiano AE, Katzmarzyk PT. Physical activity, screen time, and sitting among U.S. adolescents. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2015;27(1):151–9. doi: 10.1123/pes.2014-0022 25050541; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4504197.

51. Costigan SA, Barnett L, Plotnikoff RC, Lubans DR. The health indicators associated with screen-based sedentary behavior among adolescent girls: a systematic review. The Journal of adolescent health: official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. 2013;52(4):382–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.07.018 23299000.

52. Mitchell JA, Pate RR, Dowda M, Mattocks C, Riddoch C, Ness AR, et al. A prospective study of sedentary behavior in a large cohort of youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(6):1081–7. Epub 2011/12/07. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182446c65 22143113; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3342456.

53. Ridley K, Olds TS, Hill A. The Multimedia activity recall for children and adolescents (MARCA): development and evaluation. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2006;3(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-3-10 16725055

54. Peachey MM, Richardson J, V Tang A, Dal-Bello Haas V, Gravesande J. Environmental, behavioural and multicomponent interventions to reduce adults' sitting time: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British journal of sports medicine. 2018:bjsports-2017-098968. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098968 30352864


Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS One


2019 Číslo 11
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
nový kurz
Autori: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#