A novel radiopaque tissue marker for soft tissue localization and in vivo length and area measurements
Autoři:
Sambit Sahoo aff001; Andrew R. Baker aff001; Bong Jae Jun aff001; Ahmet Erdemir aff001; Eric T. Ricchetti aff002; Joseph P. Iannotti aff002; Kathleen A. Derwin aff001
Působiště autorů:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
aff001; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
aff002
Vyšlo v časopise:
PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224244
Souhrn
Purpose
The purpose of the study was to describe the characteristics and demonstrate proof-of-concept and clinical use of a barium sulfate infused polypropylene radiopaque tissue marker for soft tissue localization and in vivo measurement of lengths and areas.
Methods
Marker mechanical properties were evaluated by tensile tests. Biocompatibility was evaluated following 8–12 weeks’ implantation in a pig model. Proof-of-concept of marker application was performed in a human cadaveric shoulder model, and methods for CT imaging and measurement of dimensions were established. Lastly, the method of clinical use of the markers was described in one patient undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR).
Results
The radiopaque markers had a tensile strength of 28 ±4.7 N and were associated with minimal to mild inflammatory tissue reaction similar to polypropylene control. CT-based measurements showed relatively high precisions for lengths (0.66 mm), areas (6.97 mm2), and humeral orientation angles (2.1°) in the cadaveric model, and demonstrated 19 ±3 mm medio-lateral tendon retraction and 227 ±3 mm2 increase in tendon area in the patient during 26 weeks following RCR. No radiographic leaching, calcification or local adverse events were observed.
Conclusions
The radiopaque tissue marker was biocompatible and had adequate strength for handling and affixation to soft tissues using standard suturing techniques. The marker could be used with low-dose, sequential CT imaging to quantitatively measure rotator cuff tendon retractions with clinically acceptable accuracy. We envision the radiopaque tissue marker to be useful for soft tissue localization and in vivo measurement of tissue and organ dimensions following surgery.
Klíčová slova:
Tissue repair – Surgical and invasive medical procedures – Computed axial tomography – Tendons – Biomaterial implants – Surgical repair
Zdroje
1. Khan R, Konyves A, Rama KR, Thomas R, Amis AA. RSA can measure ACL graft stretching and migration: development of a new method. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;448:139–45. Epub 2006/07/11. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000224016.42669.17 16826108.
2. Schepull T, Kvist J, Andersson C, Aspenberg P. Mechanical properties during healing of Achilles tendon ruptures to predict final outcome: a pilot Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis in 10 patients. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2007;8(Journal Article):116. Epub 2007/11/28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-116 18039357.
3. McCarron JA, Derwin KA, Bey MJ, Polster JM, Schils JP, Ricchetti ET, et al. Failure with continuity in rotator cuff repair "healing". Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(1):134–41. Epub 2012/09/29. doi: 10.1177/0363546512459477 23019253.
4. Cashman PM, Baring T, Reilly P, Emery RJ, Amis AA. Measurement of migration of soft tissue by modified Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA): validation of a new technique to monitor rotator cuff tears. Journal of medical engineering & technology. 2010;34(3):159–65. Epub 2010/02/11. doi: 10.3109/03091900903174428 20143960.
5. Baring TK, Cashman PP, Reilly P, Emery RJ, Amis AA. Rotator cuff repair failure in vivo: a radiostereometric measurement study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(8):1194–9. Epub 2011/07/23. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.04.010 21778073.
6. Bhatia DN, De Beer JF. Metal markers for radiographic visualization of rotator cuff margins: A new technique for radiographic assessment of cuff repair integrity. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2013;7(1):37–9 23858295.
7. Derwin KA, Milks RA, Davidson I, Iannotti JP, McCarron JA, Bey MJ. Low-dose CT imaging of radio-opaque markers for assessing human rotator cuff repair: accuracy, repeatability and the effect of arm position. J Biomech. 2012;45(3):614–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.11.046 22169153.
8. Smith CK, Hull ML, Howell SM. Migration of radio-opaque markers injected into tendon grafts: a study using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). J Biomech Eng. 2005;127(5):887–90. doi: 10.1115/1.1992533 16248321.
9. Brower RW, Harald J, Meester GT. Direct method for determining regional myocardial shortening after bypass surgery from radiopaque markers in man. The American journal of cardiology. 1978;41(7):1222–9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(78)90879-2 307340
10. Garrison J, Ebert W, Jenkins R, Yionoulis S, Malcom H, Heyler G, et al. Measurement of three-dimensional positions and motions of large numbers of spherical radiopaque markers from biplane cineradiograms. Computers and biomedical research. 1982;15(1):76–96. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(82)90054-4 7060369
11. Niczyporuk MA, Miller DC. Automatic tracking and digitization of multiple radiopaque myocardial markers. Computers and biomedical research. 1991;24(2):129–42. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(91)90025-r 2036779
12. Crook J, Raymond Y, Salhani D, Yang H, Esche B. Prostate motion during standard radiotherapy as assessed by fiducial markers. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 1995;37(1):35–42. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(95)01613-l 8539455
13. Balter JM, Lam KL, Sandler HM, Littles JF, Bree RL, Ten Haken RK. Automated localization of the prostate at the time of treatment using implanted radiopaque markers: technical feasibility. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics. 1995;33(5):1281–6.
14. Litzenberg D, Dawson LA, Sandler H, Sanda MG, McShan DL, Ten Haken RK, et al. Daily prostate targeting using implanted radiopaque markers. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics. 2002;52(3):699–703.
15. Aubry J-F, Beaulieu L, Girouard L-M, Aubin S, Tremblay D, Laverdière J, et al. Measurements of intrafraction motion and interfraction and intrafraction rotation of prostate by three-dimensional analysis of daily portal imaging with radiopaque markers. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics. 2004;60(1):30–9.
16. Kaatee RS, Olofsen MJ, Verstraate MB, Quint S, Heijmen BJ. Detection of organ movement in cervix cancer patients using a fluoroscopic electronic portal imaging device and radiopaque markers. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics. 2002;54(2):576–83.
17. Berbeco RI, Mostafavi H, Sharp GC, Jiang SB. Towards fluoroscopic respiratory gating for lung tumours without radiopaque markers. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50(19):4481. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/19/004 16177484
18. Shirato H, Harada T, Harabayashi T, Hida K, Endo H, Kitamura K, et al. Feasibility of insertion/implantation of 2.0-mm-diameter gold internal fiducial markers for precise setup and real-time tumor tracking in radiotherapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics. 2003;56(1):240–7.
19. Roos PJ, Hull ML, Howell SM. How cyclic loading affects the migration of radio-opaque markers attached to tendon grafts using a new method: a study using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). J Biomech Eng. 2004;126(1):62–9. doi: 10.1115/1.1644568 15171130.
20. Bey MJ, Kline SK, Baker AR, McCarron JA, Iannotti JP, Derwin KA. Estimation of dynamic, in vivo soft-tissue deformation: experimental technique and application in a canine model of tendon injury and repair. J Orthop Res. 2011;29(6):822–7. Epub 2011/04/27. doi: 10.1002/jor.21315 21520256.
21. Derwin KA, Baker AR, Codsi MJ, Iannotti JP. Assessment of the canine model of rotator cuff injury and repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(5 Suppl):S140–8. Epub 2007/06/15. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.04.002 17560802.
22. Marshall NE, Keller RA, Okoroha K, Guest JM, Yu C, Muh S, et al. Radiostereometric Evaluation of Tendon Elongation After Distal Biceps Repair. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016;4(11):2325967116672620. doi: 10.1177/2325967116672620 27928546.
23. Sahoo S, Baker AR, Haskins IN, Krpata DM, Rosen MJ, Derwin KA. Assessment of Human Acellular Dermis Graft in Porcine Models for Ventral Hernia Repair. Tissue engineering Part C, Methods. 2017;23(11):718–27. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0238 28602151.
24. Sahoo S, Baker AR, Haskins IN, Krpata DM, Rosen MJ, Derwin KA. Development of a critical-sized ventral hernia model in the pig. J Surg Res. 2017;210:115–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.10.026 28457317.
25. Radiopaque Tissue Marker (K170026) 2017. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf17/K170026.pdf.
26. ASTM D2256-02: Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Yarns by the Single-Strand Method. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA; 2002, http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?D2256-02.
27. Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources (U.S.). Committee on Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. NIH publication. Bethesda, Md.: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. p. volumes.
28. Codsi MJ, Bennetts C, Gordiev K, Boeck DM, Kwon Y, Brems J, et al. Normal glenoid vault anatomy and validation of a novel glenoid implant shape. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(3):471–8. Epub 2008/03/11. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.08.010 18328741.
29. Scalise JJ, Codsi MJ, Bryan J, Iannotti JP. The three-dimensional glenoid vault model can estimate normal glenoid version in osteoarthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(3):487–91. Epub 2008/02/20. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.09.006 18282721.
30. Ganapathi A, McCarron JA, Chen X, Iannotti JP. Predicting normal glenoid version from the pathologic scapula: a comparison of 4 methods in 2- and 3-dimensional models. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(2):234–44. Epub 2010/10/12. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.05.024 20933439.
31. Cleveland Clinic. Rotator Cuff Failure With Continuity (NCT02716441) [updated December 17, 2018]. https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT02716441.
32. Ackland DC, Keynejad F, Pandy MG. Future trends in the use of X-ray fluoroscopy for the measurement and modelling of joint motion. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine. 2011;225(12):1136–48. doi: 10.1177/0954411911422840 22320053.
33. Bey MJ, Zauel R, Brock SK, Tashman S. Validation of a new model-based tracking technique for measuring three-dimensional, in vivo glenohumeral joint kinematics. J Biomech Eng. 2006;128(4):604–9. doi: 10.1115/1.2206199 16813452
34. DeMaio DN. CT Radiation Dose and Risk: Fact vs Fiction. Radiol Technol. 2017;89(2):199–205. 29298927.
35. Lin EC, editor Radiation risk from medical imaging. Mayo Clinic Proceedings; 2010: Elsevier.
Článok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 10
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Nejasný stín na plicích – kazuistika
- Masturbační chování žen v ČR − dotazníková studie
- Úspěšná resuscitativní thorakotomie v přednemocniční neodkladné péči
- Fixní kombinace paracetamol/kodein nabízí synergické analgetické účinky
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Correction: Low dose naltrexone: Effects on medication in rheumatoid and seropositive arthritis. A nationwide register-based controlled quasi-experimental before-after study
- Combining CDK4/6 inhibitors ribociclib and palbociclib with cytotoxic agents does not enhance cytotoxicity
- Experimentally validated simulation of coronary stents considering different dogboning ratios and asymmetric stent positioning
- Prevalence of pectus excavatum (PE), pectus carinatum (PC), tracheal hypoplasia, thoracic spine deformities and lateral heart displacement in thoracic radiographs of screw-tailed brachycephalic dogs