Socioeconomic status and alcohol use disorders across the lifespan: A co-relative control study
Autoři:
Susanna Calling aff001; Henrik Ohlsson aff001; Jan Sundquist aff001; Kristina Sundquist aff001; Kenneth S. Kendler aff003
Působiště autorů:
Center for Primary Health Care Research, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
aff001; Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
aff002; Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America
aff003; Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America
aff004
Vyšlo v časopise:
PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224127
Souhrn
Objectives
Alcohol use disorders (AUD) is well known to aggregate in families and is associated with socioeconomic status (SES). The objective was to study the effect of education, income and neighborhood SES in adulthood on AUD, and to explore whether the potential associations were confounded by shared familial factors, by using a co-relative control design.
Methods
Data on AUD was drawn from the Swedish inpatient and outpatient care registers; prescription drug register; and crime data. Through national population registers we collected information on income, education and neighborhood SES at age 25, 30, 35 and 40 years in all individuals born in Sweden between 1950 and 1980. Each sex-specific stratum consisted of approximately 750,000–1,200,000 individuals, who were followed for AUD for a mean follow-up time ranging between 10 and 15 years until the end of 2013. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate the risk of AUD as a function of income, education and neighborhood SES in the general population and in pairs of first cousins and full siblings within the same sex, who differed in their exposure to the SES measure.
Results
Higher educational level, higher income and higher neighborhood SES were all associated with a reduced risk for AUD for both males and females in all ages. The potentially protective effect remained but was attenuated when comparing pairs of first cousins and full siblings.
Conclusions
High educational level and income in adulthood, as well as high neighborhood socioeconomic status, may represent protective factors against alcohol use disorders, even when shared familial factors, e.g. childhood socioeconomic status and genetic factors, have been taken into account.
Klíčová slova:
Human genetics – Socioeconomic aspects of health – Alcohol consumption – Behavior – Educational attainment – Sweden – Alcoholism – Neighborhoods
Zdroje
1. Rehm J, Baliunas D, Borges GL, Graham K, Irving H, Kehoe T, et al. The relation between different dimensions of alcohol consumption and burden of disease: an overview. Addiction. 2010;105(5):817–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02899.x 20331573
2. Kendler KS, Ohlsson H, Sundquist J, Sundquist K. Transmission of alcohol use disorder across three generations: a Swedish National Study. Psychol Med. 2018;48(1):33–42. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000794 28956523
3. GBD 2015 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1659–724. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31679-8 27733284
4. National health and medical research council. Australian guidelines to reduce the health risks from drinking alcohol. 2009. Available from: http://alcoholthinkagain.com.au/Portals/0/documents/publications/Resources%20for%20Health%20Professionals/Nhmrc-Guidelines.pdf [
5. Jones L, Bates G, McCoy E, Bellis MA. Relationship between alcohol-attributable disease and socioeconomic status, and the role of alcohol consumption in this relationship: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:400. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1720-7 25928558
6. Makela P. Alcohol-related mortality as a function of socio-economic status. Addiction. 1999;94(6):867–86. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.94686710.x 10665076
7. Huckle T, You RQ, Casswell S. Socio-economic status predicts drinking patterns but not alcohol-related consequences independently. Addiction. 2010;105(7):1192–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02931.x 20456295
8. Gauffin K, Hemmingsson T, Hjern A. The effect of childhood socioeconomic position on alcohol-related disorders later in life: a Swedish national cohort study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67(11):932–8. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-202624 23814272
9. Slutske WS. Alcohol use disorders among US college students and their non-college-attending peers. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(3):321–7. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.3.321 15753245
10. van Oers JA, Bongers IM, van de Goor LA, Garretsen HF. Alcohol consumption, alcohol-related problems, problem drinking, and socioeconomic status. Alcohol Alcohol. 1999;34(1):78–88. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/34.1.78 10075406
11. Humensky JL. Are adolescents with high socioeconomic status more likely to engage in alcohol and illicit drug use in early adulthood? Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2010;5:19. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-5-19 20687935
12. Hart CL, Davey Smith G, Upton MN, Watt GC. Alcohol consumption behaviours and social mobility in men and women of the Midspan Family study. Alcohol Alcohol. 2009;44(3):332–6. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agn125 19168459
13. Karvonen S, Rimpela AH, Rimpela MK. Social mobility and health related behaviours in young people. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(4):211–7. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.4.211 10396546
14. Jefferis BJ, Power C, Manor O. Adolescent drinking level and adult binge drinking in a national birth cohort. Addiction. 2005;100(4):543–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01034.x 15784069
15. Kendler KS, Ohlsson H, Edwards AC, Sundquist J, Sundquist K. A developmental model for alcohol use disorders in Swedish men. Psychol Med. 2016;46(13):2759–70. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716001409 27443147
16. Karriker-Jaffe KJ. Areas of disadvantage: a systematic review of effects of area-level socioeconomic status on substance use outcomes. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2011;30(1):84–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00191.x 21219502
17. Pollack CE, Cubbin C, Ahn D, Winkleby M. Neighbourhood deprivation and alcohol consumption: does the availability of alcohol play a role? Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34(4):772–80. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi026 15737966
18. Stimpson JP, Ju H, Raji MA, Eschbach K. Neighborhood deprivation and health risk behaviors in NHANES III. Am J Health Behav. 2007;31(2):215–22. doi: 10.5555/ajhb.2007.31.2.215 17269911
19. Matheson FI, White HL, Moineddin R, Dunn JR, Glazier RH. Drinking in context: the influence of gender and neighbourhood deprivation on alcohol consumption. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66(6):e4. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.112441 21330461
20. Verhulst B, Neale MC, Kendler KS. The heritability of alcohol use disorders: a meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychol Med. 2015;45(5):1061–72. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714002165 25171596
21. Winkleby M, Sundquist K, Cubbin C. Inequities in CHD incidence and case fatality by neighborhood deprivation. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(2):97–106. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.10.002 17234484
22. Latvala A, Dick DM, Tuulio-Henriksson A, Suvisaari J, Viken RJ, Rose RJ, et al. Genetic correlation and gene-environment interaction between alcohol problems and educational level in young adulthood. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011;72(2):210–20. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.210 21388594
23. Herttua K, Makela P, Martikainen P. Changes in alcohol-related mortality and its socioeconomic differences after a large reduction in alcohol prices: a natural experiment based on register data. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168(10):1110–8; discussion 26–31. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn216 18718894
24. Herttua K, Makela P, Martikainen P. Educational inequalities in hospitalization attributable to alcohol: a population-based longitudinal study of changes during the period 2000–07. Addiction. 2015;110(7):1092–100. doi: 10.1111/add.12933 25808691
25. Probst C, Roerecke M, Behrendt S, Rehm J. Socioeconomic differences in alcohol-attributable mortality compared with all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(4):1314–27. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu043 24618188
26. Hill TD, Angel RJ. Neighborhood disorder, psychological distress, and heavy drinking. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(5):965–75. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.027 15955398
27. Sundquist K, Winkleby M, Ahlen H, Johansson SE. Neighborhood socioeconomic environment and incidence of coronary heart disease: a follow-up study of 25,319 women and men in Sweden. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(7):655–62. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh096 15033643
28. Hakulinen C, Elovainio M, Arffman M, Lumme S, Pirkola S, Keskimaki I, et al. Mental disorders and long-term labour market outcomes: nationwide cohort study of 2 055 720 individuals. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2019.
29. Hamdi NR, Krueger RF, South SC. Socioeconomic status moderates genetic and environmental effects on the amount of alcohol use. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015;39(4):603–10. doi: 10.1111/acer.12673 25778493
30. Beard E, Brown J, West R, Kaner E, Meier P, Michie S. Associations between socio-economic factors and alcohol consumption: A population survey of adults in England. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0209442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209442 30716098
31. Groenman AP, Janssen TWP, Oosterlaan J. Childhood Psychiatric Disorders as Risk Factor for Subsequent Substance Abuse: A Meta-Analysis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;56(7):556–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.05.004 28647007
32. Jane-Llopis E, Matytsina I. Mental health and alcohol, drugs and tobacco: a review of the comorbidity between mental disorders and the use of alcohol, tobacco and illicit drugs. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2006;25(6):515–36. doi: 10.1080/09595230600944461 17132571
33. Kosidou K, Dalman C, Lundberg M, Hallqvist J, Isacsson G, Magnusson C. Socioeconomic status and risk of psychological distress and depression in the Stockholm Public Health Cohort: a population-based study. J Affect Disord. 2011;134(1–3):160–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.05.024 21665286
34. Herttua K, Ostergren O, Lundberg O, Martikainen P. Influence of affordability of alcohol on educational disparities in alcohol-related mortality in Finland and Sweden: a time series analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017;71(12):1168–76. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209636 29061845
35. Jiang H, Livingston M. The Dynamic Effects of Changes in Prices and Affordability on Alcohol Consumption: An Impulse Response Analysis. Alcohol Alcohol. 2015;50(6):631–8. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agv064 26071563
Článok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 10
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Nejasný stín na plicích – kazuistika
- Masturbační chování žen v ČR − dotazníková studie
- Profylaxe infekční endokarditidy ve stomatologii
- Fixní kombinace paracetamol/kodein nabízí synergické analgetické účinky
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Correction: Low dose naltrexone: Effects on medication in rheumatoid and seropositive arthritis. A nationwide register-based controlled quasi-experimental before-after study
- Combining CDK4/6 inhibitors ribociclib and palbociclib with cytotoxic agents does not enhance cytotoxicity
- Experimentally validated simulation of coronary stents considering different dogboning ratios and asymmetric stent positioning
- Risk factors associated with IgA vasculitis with nephritis (Henoch–Schönlein purpura nephritis) progressing to unfavorable outcomes: A meta-analysis