The Nordic Maintenance Care Program: Does psychological profile modify the treatment effect of a preventive manual therapy intervention? A secondary analysis of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial
Autoři:
Andreas Eklund aff001; Irene Jensen aff001; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde aff002; Alice Kongsted aff003; Mattias Jonsson aff005; Peter Lövgren aff006; Jakob Petersen-Klingberg aff007; Christian Calvert aff008; Iben Axén aff001
Působiště autorů:
Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Stockholm, Sweden
aff001; Institute for Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
aff002; Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Odense, Denmark
aff003; Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
aff004; Private practice, Lidköping, Sweden
aff005; Private practice, Stockholm, Sweden
aff006; Private practice, Borlänge, Sweden
aff007; Private practice, Falkenberg, Sweden
aff008
Vyšlo v časopise:
PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223349
Souhrn
Background
Chiropractic maintenance care is effective as secondary/tertiary prevention of non-specific low back pain (LBP), but the potential effect moderation by psychological characteristics is unknown. The objective was to investigate whether patients in specific psychological sub-groups had different responses to MC with regard to the total number of days with bothersome pain and the number of treatments.
Method
Data from a two-arm randomized pragmatic multicenter trial with a 12-month follow up, designed to investigate the effectiveness of maintenance care, was used. Consecutive patients, 18–65 years of age, with recurrent and persistent LBP seeking chiropractic care with a good effect of the initial treatment were included. Eligible subjects were randomized to either maintenance care (prescheduled care) or to the control intervention, symptom-guided care. The primary outcome of the trial was the total number of days with bothersome LBP collected weekly for 12 months using an automated SMS system. Data used to classify patients according to psychological subgroups defined by the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (adaptive copers, interpersonally distressed and dysfunctional) were collected at the screening visit.
Results
A total of 252 subjects were analyzed using a generalized estimating equations linear regression framework. Patients in the dysfunctional subgroup who received maintenance care reported fewer days with pain (-30.0; 95% CI: -36.6, -23.4) and equal number of treatments compared to the control intervention. In the adaptive coper subgroup, patients who received maintenance care reported more days with pain (10.7; 95% CI: 4.0, 17.5) and more treatments (3.9; 95% CI: 3.5, 4.2). Patients in the interpersonally distressed subgroup reported equal number of days with pain (-0.3; 95% CI: -8.7, 8.1) and more treatments (1.5; 95% CI: 0.9, 2.1) on maintenance care.
Conclusions
Psychological and behavioral characteristics modify the effect of MC and should be considered when recommending long-term preventive management of patients with recurrent and persistent LBP.
Klíčová slova:
Lower back pain – Cancer treatment – Fear – Prognosis – Sweden – Research grants – Pain psychology – Chiropractic
Zdroje
1. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Measuring the global burden of disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(5):448–57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1201534 23902484.
2. Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Bain C, et al. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(6):968–74. Epub 2014/03/26. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428 [pii]. 24665116.
3. Buchbinder R, van Tulder M, Oberg B, Costa LM, Woolf A, Schoene M, et al. Low back pain: a call for action. Lancet. 2018. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30488-4 29573871.
4. Clark S, Horton R. Low back pain: a major global challenge. Lancet. 2018. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30725-6 29573869.
5. Foster NE, Anema JR, Cherkin D, Chou R, Cohen SP, Gross DP, et al. Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions. Lancet. 2018. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30489-6 29573872.
6. Hartvigsen J, Hancock MJ, Kongsted A, Louw Q, Ferreira ML, Genevay S, et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet. 2018. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X 29573870.
7. Steffens D, Maher CG, Pereira LS, Stevens ML, Oliveira VC, Chapple M, et al. Prevention of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(2):199–208. Epub 2016/01/12. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7431 [pii]. 26752509.
8. Eklund A, Jensen I, Lohela-Karlsson M, Hagberg J, Leboeuf-Yde C, Kongsted A, et al. The Nordic Maintenance Care program: Effectiveness of chiropractic maintenance care versus symptom-guided treatment for recurrent and persistent low back pain-A pragmatic randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0203029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203029 30208070.
9. Axen I, Jensen IB, Eklund A, Halasz L, Jorgensen K, Lange F, et al. The Nordic Maintenance Care Program: when do chiropractors recommend secondary and tertiary preventive care for low back pain? Chiropr Osteopat. 2009;17:1. Epub 2009/01/24. 1746-1340-17-1 [pii] doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-17-1 19161611; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2633010.
10. Bringsli M, Berntzen A, Olsen DB, Leboeuf-Yde C, Hestbaek L. The Nordic Maintenance Care Program: Maintenance care—what happens during the consultation? Observations and patient questionnaires. Chiropr Man Therap. 2012;20(1):25. Epub 2012/08/14. 2045-709X-20-25 [pii] doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-20-25 22883475.
11. Leboeuf-Yde C, Hestbaek L. Maintenance care in chiropractic—what do we know? Chiropr Osteopat. 2008;16:3. Epub 2008/05/10. 1746-1340-16-3 [pii] doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-16-3 18466623; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2396648.
12. Myburgh C, Brandborg-Olsen D, Albert H, Hestbaek L. The Nordic maintenance care program: what is maintenance care? Interview based survey of Danish chiropractors. Chiropr Man Therap. 2013;21(1):27. Epub 2013/08/22. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-21-27 [pii]. 23962318; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3766236.
13. Rupert RL. A survey of practice patterns and the health promotion and prevention attitudes of US chiropractors. Maintenance care: part I. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23(1):1–9. Epub 2000/02/05. S0161-4754(00)90107-6 [pii]. 10658870.
14. Rupert RL, Manello D, Sandefur R. Maintenance care: health promotion services administered to US chiropractic patients aged 65 and older, part II. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23(1):10–9. Epub 2000/02/05. S0161-4754(00)90108-8 [pii]. 10658871.
15. Malmqvist S, Leboeuf-Yde C. The Nordic maintenance care program: case management of chiropractic patients with low back pain—defining the patients suitable for various management strategies. Chiropr Osteopat. 2009;17:7. Epub 2009/07/15. 1746-1340-17-7 [pii] doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-17-7 19594894; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2717107.
16. Moller LT, Hansen M, Leboeuf-Yde C. The Nordic Maintenance Care Program—an interview study on the use of maintenance care in a selected group of Danish chiropractors. Chiropr Osteopat. 2009;17:5. Epub 2009/06/19. 1746-1340-17-5 [pii] doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-17-5 19534801; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2704232.
17. Hansen SF, Laursen ALS, Jensen TS, Leboeuf-Yde C, L H. The Nordic maintenance care program: what are the indications for maintenance care in patients with low back pain? A survey of the members of the Danish Chiropractors' Association. Chiropr Osteopat. 2010;18:25. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-18-25 20809940
18. Axen I, Bodin L. The Nordic maintenance care program: the clinical use of identified indications for preventive care. Chiropr Man Therap. 2013;21(1):10. Epub 2013/03/19. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-21-10 [pii]. 23497707; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3610207.
19. Sandnes KF, Bjørnstad C, Leboeuf-Yde C, Hestbaek L. The Nordic Maintenance Care Program—Time intervals between treatments of patients with low back pain: how close and who decides? Chiropractic & Osteopathy. 2010;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-18-5 20211006
20. Axen I, Rosenbaum A, Eklund A, Halasz L, Jorgensen K, Lovgren PW, et al. The Nordic maintenance care program—case management of chiropractic patients with low back pain: a survey of Swedish chiropractors. Chiropr Osteopat. 2008;16:6. Epub 2008/06/19. 1746-1340-16-6 [pii] doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-16-6 18559119; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2442107.
21. Breen AC. Chiropractors and the treatment of back pain. Rheumatol Rehabil. 1977;16(1):46–53. 139670.
22. Leboeuf-Yde C, Gronstvedt A, Borge JA, Lothe J, Magnesen E, Nilsson O, et al. The Nordic back pain subpopulation program: a 1-year prospective multicenter study of outcomes of persistent low-back pain in chiropractic patients. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005;28(2):90–6. Epub 2005/04/01. S0161475405000114 [pii] doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.01.010 15800507.
23. Senna MK, Machaly SA. Does maintained spinal manipulation therapy for chronic nonspecific low back pain result in better long-term outcome? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(18):1427–37. Epub 2011/01/20. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f5dfe0 21245790.
24. Descarreaux M, Blouin J-S, Drolet M, Papadimitriou S, Teasdale N. Efficacy of Preventive Spinal Manipulation for Chronic Low-Back Pain and Related Disabilities: A Preliminary Study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004;27(8):509–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2004.08.003 15510094
25. Martel J, Dugas C, Dubois JD, Descarreaux M. A randomised controlled trial of preventive spinal manipulation with and without a home exercise program for patients with chronic neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:41. Epub 2011/02/10. 1471-2474-12-41 [pii] doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-41 21303529; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3045999.
26. Maiers M, Hartvigsen J, Evans R, Westrom K, Wang Q, Schulz C, et al. Short or long-term treatment of spinal disability in older adults with manipulation and exercise. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018. doi: 10.1002/acr.23798 30354023.
27. Eklund A, Axen I, Kongsted A, Lohela-Karlsson M, Leboeuf-Yde C, Jensen I. Prevention of low back pain: effect, cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility of maintenance care—study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2014;15(1):102. Epub 2014/04/03. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-1021745-6215-15-102 [pii]. 24690201; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3984260.
28. Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 1965;150(3699):971–9. Epub 1965/11/19. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3699.971 5320816.
29. Hall AM, Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Latimer J, Ferreira ML, Nicholas MK. Symptoms of depression and stress mediate the effect of pain on disability. Pain. 2011;152(5):1044–51. Epub 2011/02/11. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.01.014 [pii]. 21306826.
30. Fordyce W. Behavior Methods for Cronic Pain and Illness. Saint Louis: The C.V. Mosby Company; 1976.
31. Gatchel RJ TD. Psychosocial factors in pain: critical perspectives. New York: Guilford Press; 1999.
32. Hoogendoorn WE, van Poppel MN, Bongers PM, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(16):2114–25. Epub 2000/08/23. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200008150-00017 10954644.
33. Macfarlane GJ, Thomas E, Croft PR, Papageorgiou AC, Jayson MI, Silman AJ. Predictors of early improvement in low back pain amongst consulters to general practice: the influence of pre-morbid and episode-related factors. Pain. 1999;80(1–2):113–9. Epub 1999/04/16. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00209-7 10204723.
34. Burton AK, Tillotson KM, Main CJ, Hollis S. Psychosocial predictors of outcome in acute and subchronic low back trouble. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20(6):722–8. Epub 1995/03/15. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199503150-00014 7604349.
35. Linton SJ, Hallden K. Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain. Clin J Pain. 1998;14(3):209–15. Epub 1998/10/03. 9758070.
36. Kerns RD, Turk DC, Rudy TE. The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI). Pain. 1985;23(4):345–56. Epub 1985/12/01. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90004-1 4088697.
37. Bergstrom G, Bergstrom C, Hagberg J, Bodin L, Jensen I. A 7-year follow-up of multidisciplinary rehabilitation among chronic neck and back pain patients. Is sick leave outcome dependent on psychologically derived patient groups? Eur J Pain. 2010;14(4):426–33. Epub 2009/08/18. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.06.008 [pii]. 19683950.
38. Bergstrom C, Hagberg J, Bodin L, Jensen I, Bergstrom G. Using a psychosocial subgroup assignment to predict sickness absence in a working population with neck and back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:81. Epub 2011/04/28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-81 [pii]. 21521502; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3097013.
39. Turk DC, Rudy TE. The robustness of an empirically derived taxonomy of chronic pain patients. Pain. 1990;43(1):27–35. Epub 1990/10/01. 0304-3959(90)90047-H [pii]. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(90)90047-h 2148974.
40. Turk DC. The potential of treatment matching for subgroups of patients with chronic pain: lumping versus splitting. Clin J Pain. 2005;21(1):44–55; discussion 69–72. Epub 2004/12/16. doi: 00002508-200501000-00006 [pii]. 15599131.
41. Fritz JM, Koppenhaver SL, Kawchuk GN, Teyhen DS, Hebert JJ, Childs JD. Preliminary investigation of the mechanisms underlying the effects of manipulation: exploration of a multivariate model including spinal stiffness, multifidus recruitment, and clinical findings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(21):1772–81. Epub 2011/03/02. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318216337d 21358568; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3150636.
42. Koppenhaver SL, Fritz JM, Hebert JJ, Kawchuk GN, Parent EC, Gill NW, et al. Association between history and physical examination factors and change in lumbar multifidus muscle thickness after spinal manipulation in patients with low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012;22(5):724–31. Epub 2012/04/21. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.03.004 [pii]. 22516351; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3407297.
43. Haavik H, Murphy B. The role of spinal manipulation in addressing disordered sensorimotor integration and altered motor control. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012;22(5):768–76. Epub 2012/04/10. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.02.012 [pii]. 22483612.
44. Pickar JG, Bolton PS. Spinal manipulative therapy and somatosensory activation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012;22(5):785–94. Epub 2012/02/22. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.01.015 [pii]. 22349622; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3399029.
45. Coronado RA, Gay CW, Bialosky JE, Carnaby GD, Bishop MD, George SZ. Changes in pain sensitivity following spinal manipulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012;22(5):752–67. Epub 2012/02/03. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.12.013 [pii]. 22296867; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3349049.
46. Field JR, Newell D, McCarthy PW. Preliminary study into the components of the fear-avoidance model of LBP: change after an initial chiropractic visit and influence on outcome. Chiropr Osteopat. 2010;18:21. Epub 2010/08/03. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-18-21 [pii]. 20673330; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2923166.
47. Bergstrom G, Bodin L, Jensen IB, Linton SJ, Nygren AL. Long-term, non-specific spinal pain: reliable and valid subgroups of patients. Behav Res Ther. 2001;39(1):75–87. Epub 2000/12/28. S0005-7967(99)00175-8 [pii]. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00175-8 11125725.
48. Lousberg R, Van Breukelen GJ, Groenman NH, Schmidt AJ, Arntz A, Winter FA. Psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory, Dutch language version (MPI-DLV). Behav Res Ther. 1999;37(2):167–82. Epub 1999/02/17. S0005796798001375 [pii]. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00137-5 9990748.
49. Turk DC. Strategies for classifying chronic orofacial pain patients. Anesth Prog. 1990;37(2–3):155–60. Epub 1990/03/01. 2085195; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2190331.
50. Walter L, Brannon L. A cluster analysis of the multidimensional pain inventory. Headache. 1991;31(7):476–9. Epub 1991/07/01. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1991.hed3107476.x 1774166.
51. Turk DC, Okifuji A, Sinclair JD, Starz TW. Pain, disability, and physical functioning in subgroups of patients with fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol. 1996;23(7):1255–62. Epub 1996/07/01. 8823701.
52. Turk DC, Sist TC, Okifuji A, Miner MF, Florio G, Harrison P, et al. Adaptation to metastatic cancer pain, regional/local cancer pain and non-cancer pain: role of psychological and behavioral factors. Pain. 1998;74(2–3):247–56. Epub 1998/03/31. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00187-5 9520239.
53. Bergstrom G, Bergstrom C, Hagberg J, Bodin L, Jensen I. A 7-year follow-up of multidisciplinary rehabilitation among chronic neck and back pain patients. Is sick leave outcome dependent on psychologically derived patient groups? Eur J Pain. 2010;14(4):426–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.06.008 [pii] Epub 2009 Aug 15. 19683950
54. Bergstrom G, Bjorklund C, Fried I, Lisspers J, Nathell L, Hermansson U, et al. A comprehensive workplace intervention and its outcome with regard to lifestyle, health and sick leave: the AHA study. Work. 2008;31(2):167–80. Epub 2008/10/30. 18957735.
55. Bergstrom G, Jensen IB, Bodin L, Linton SJ, Nygren AL. The impact of psychologically different patient groups on outcome after a vocational rehabilitation program for long-term spinal pain patients. Pain. 2001;93(3):229–37. Epub 2001/08/22. S0304395901003207 [pii]. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00320-7 11514082.
56. Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Battie M, Street J, Barlow W. A comparison of physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation, and provision of an educational booklet for the treatment of patients with low back pain. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(15):1021–9. Epub 1998/10/08. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199810083391502 9761803.
57. Daltroy LH, Cats-Baril WL, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Liang MH. The North American spine society lumbar spine outcome assessment Instrument: reliability and validity tests. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(6):741–9. Epub 1996/03/15. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199603150-00017 8882698.
58. Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23(18):2003–13. Epub 1998/10/21. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199809150-00018 9779535.
59. Rasmussen CD, Holtermann A, Bay H, Sogaard K, Birk Jorgensen M. A multifaceted workplace intervention for low back pain in nurses' aides: a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. Pain. 2015;156(9):1786–94. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000234 25993549; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4617291.
60. Patrick DL, Deyo RA, Atlas SJ, Singer DE, Chapin A, Keller RB. Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20(17):1899–908; discussion 909. Epub 1995/09/01. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199509000-00011 8560339.
61. Kongsted A, Leboeuf-Yde C. The Nordic back pain subpopulation program: course patterns established through weekly follow-ups in patients treated for low back pain. Chiropr Osteopat. 2010;18:2. Epub 2010/02/13. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-18-2 20150994; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2820484.
62. Dunn KM, Croft PR. Classification of low back pain in primary care: using "bothersomeness" to identify the most severe cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(16):1887–92. Epub 2005/08/17. 00007632-200508150-00016 [pii]. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000173900.46863.02 16103861.
63. Johansen B, Wedderkopp N. Comparison between data obtained through real-time data capture by SMS and a retrospective telephone interview. Chiropractic & Osteopathy. 2010;18(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-18-10 20500900
64. Kristjansdottir O, Fors E, Eide E, Finset A, van Dulmen S, Wigers S, et al. Written online situational feedback via mobile phone to support self-management of chronic widespread pain: a usability study of a Web-based intervention. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2011;12(1):51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-51 21352516
65. SMS-Track. Available from: http://.www.sms-track.com.
66. SPSS Statistics Available from: http://www-01.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/products/statistics/index.
67. Riipinen M, Niemisto L, Lindgren KA, Hurri H. Psychosocial differences as predictors for recovery from chronic low back pain following manipulation, stabilizing exercises and physician consultation or physician consultation alone. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(3):152–8. doi: 10.1080/16501970410022426 WOS:000229479000005. 16040472
68. Bergstrom C, Jensen I, Hagberg J, Busch H, Bergstrom G. Effectiveness of different interventions using a psychosocial subgroup assignment in chronic neck and back pain patients: a 10-year follow-up. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(2):110–8. Epub 2011/10/13. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.607218 21988525.
69. Rudy TE, Turk DC, Kubinski JA, Zaki HS. Differential Treatment Responses of Tmd Patients as a Function of Psychological Characteristics. Pain. 1995;61(1):103–12. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00151-4 WOS:A1995QW07700014. 7644232
70. Jamison RN, Rudy TE, Penzien DB, Mosley TH Jr. Cognitive-behavioral classifications of chronic pain: replication and extension of empirically derived patient profiles. Pain. 1994;57(3):277–92. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90003-5 7936707.
71. Salsbury SA, DeVocht JW, Hondras MA, Seidman MB, Stanford CM, Goertz CM. Chiropractor interaction and treatment equivalence in a pilot randomized controlled trial: an observational analysis of clinical encounter video-recordings. Chiropr Man Therap. 2014;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12998-014-0042-7 25478142; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4255952.
72. Kaptchuk TJ, Kelley JM, Conboy LA, Davis RB, Kerr CE, Jacobson EE, et al. Components of placebo effect: randomised controlled trial in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. BMJ. 2008;336(7651):999–1003. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39524.439618.25 18390493; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2364862.
Článok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS One
2019 Číslo 10
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Nejasný stín na plicích – kazuistika
- Masturbační chování žen v ČR − dotazníková studie
- Těžké menstruační krvácení může značit poruchu krevní srážlivosti. Jaký management vyšetření a léčby je v takovém případě vhodný?
- Fixní kombinace paracetamol/kodein nabízí synergické analgetické účinky
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Correction: Low dose naltrexone: Effects on medication in rheumatoid and seropositive arthritis. A nationwide register-based controlled quasi-experimental before-after study
- Combining CDK4/6 inhibitors ribociclib and palbociclib with cytotoxic agents does not enhance cytotoxicity
- Experimentally validated simulation of coronary stents considering different dogboning ratios and asymmetric stent positioning
- Risk factors associated with IgA vasculitis with nephritis (Henoch–Schönlein purpura nephritis) progressing to unfavorable outcomes: A meta-analysis