Hyaluronic acid and epidermal growth factor improved the bovine embryo quality by regulating the DNA methylation and expression patterns of the focal adhesion pathway

1. Lonergan P, Rizos D, Gutiérrez-Adán A, Fair T, Boland MP. Effect of culture environment on embryo quality and gene expression—experience from animal studies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;7(6):657–63. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)62088-3 14748964

2. Gad A, Hoelker M, Besenfelder U, Havlicek V, Cinar U, Rings F, et al. Molecular mechanisms and pathways involved in bovine embryonic genome activation and their regulation by alternative in vivo and in vitro culture conditions. Biol Reprod. 2012;87(4):100. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.112.099697 22811576

3. Salilew-Wondim D, Fournier E, Hoelker M, Saeed-Zidane M, Tholen E, Looft C, et al. Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Patterns of Bovine Blastocysts Developed In Vivo from Embryos Completed Different Stages of Development In Vitro. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0140467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140467 26536655

4. Salilew-Wondim D, Saeed-Zidane M, Hoelker M, Gebremedhn S, Poirier M, Om Pandey H, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation patterns of bovine blastocysts derived from in vivo embryos subjected to in vitro culture before, during or after embryonic genome activation. BMC Genomics. 2018;19:424. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4826-3 29859035

5. Wrighton KH. Cell adhesion: the 'ins' and 'outs' of integrin signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14(12):752.

6. Kaneko Y, Lecce L, Day ML, Murphy CR. Focal adhesion kinase localizes to sites of cell-to-cell contact in vivo and increases apically in rat uterine luminal epithelium and the blastocyst at the time of implantation. J Morphol. 2012;273(6):639–50. doi: 10.1002/jmor.20010 22322452

7. Bladt F, Aippersbach E, Gelkop S, Strasser GA, Nash P, Tafuri A, et al. The murine Nck SH2/SH3 adaptors are important for the development of mesoderm-derived embryonic structures and for regulating the cellular actin network. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23(13):4586–97. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.13.4586-4597.2003 12808099

8. Renshaw MW, Price LS, Schwartz MA. Focal adhesion kinase mediates the integrin signaling requirement for growth factor activation of MAP kinase. J Cell Biol. 1999;147(3):611–8. doi: 10.1083/jcb.147.3.611 10545504

9. Sinclair KD, Rooke JA, McEvoy TG. Regulation of nutrient uptake and metabolism in pre-elongation ruminant embryos. Reprod Suppl. 2003;61):371–85.

10. Adamson ED. Activities of growth factors in preimplantation embryos. J Cell Biochem. 1993;53(4):280–7. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240530403 8300744

11. Wei Z, Park KW, Day BN, Prather RS. Effect of epidermal growth factor on preimplantation development and its receptor expression in porcine embryos. Mol Reprod Dev. 2001;60(4):457–62. doi: 10.1002/mrd.1110 11746956

12. Cebrian-Serrano A, Salvador I, Silvestre MA. Beneficial effect of two culture systems with small groups of embryos on the development and quality of in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Anat Histol Embryol. 2014;43(1):22–30. doi: 10.1111/ahe.12043 23488942

13. Block J, Bonilla L, Hansen PJ. Effect of addition of hyaluronan to embryo culture medium on survival of bovine embryos in vitro following vitrification and establishment of pregnancy after transfer to recipients. Theriogenology. 2009;71(7):1063–71. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.11.007 19157530

14. Reis e Silva AR, Bruno C, Fleurot R, Daniel N, Archilla C, Peynot N, et al. Alteration of DNA demethylation dynamics by in vitro culture conditions in rabbit pre-implantation embryos. Epigenetics. 2012;7(5):440–6. doi: 10.4161/epi.19563 22419129

15. Katari S, Turan N, Bibikova M, Erinle O, Chalian R, Foster M, et al. DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro or in vivo. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(20):3769–78. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp319 19605411

16. Park YS, Lin YC. Effect of epidermal growth factor (EGF) and defined simple media on in vitro bovine oocyte maturation and early embryonic development. Theriogenology. 1993;39(2):475–84. doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(93)90390-q 16727227

17. Mtango NR, Varisanga MD, Dong YJ, Rajamahendran R, Suzuki T. Growth factors and growth hormone enhance in vitro embryo production and post-thaw survival of vitrified bovine blastocysts. Theriogenology. 2003;59(5–6):1393–402. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(02)01163-9 12527085

18. Oyamada T, Iwayama H, Fukui Y. Additional effect of epidermal growth factor during in vitro maturation for individual bovine oocytes using a chemically defined medium. Zygote. 2004;12(2):143–50. 15460109

19. Ahumada CJ, Salvador I, Cebrian-Serrano A, Lopera R, Silvestre MA. Effect of supplementation of different growth factors in embryo culture medium with a small number of bovine embryos on in vitro embryo development and quality. Animal. 2013;7(3):455–62. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112001991 23121725

20. Furnus CC, Matos DG de, Martinez AG. Effect of hyaluronic acid on development of in vitro produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology. 1998;49(8):1489–99. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(98)00095-8 10732013

21. Palasz AT, Rodriguez-Martinez H, Beltran-Brena P, Perez-Garnelo S, Martinez MF, Gutierrez-Adan A, La Fuente J de. Effects of hyaluronan, BSA, and serum on bovine embryo in vitro development, ultrastructure, and gene expression patterns. Mol Reprod Dev. 2006;73(12):1503–11. doi: 10.1002/mrd.20516 16902955

22. Palasz AT, Brena PB, Martinez MF, Perez-Garnelo SS, Ramirez MA, Gutierrez-Adan A, La Fuente J de. Development, molecular composition and freeze tolerance of bovine embryos cultured in TCM-199 supplemented with hyaluronan. Zygote. 2008;16(1):39–47. doi: 10.1017/S0967199407004467 18221580

23. Handyside AH, Hunter S. A rapid procedure for visualising the inner cell mass and trophectoderm nuclei of mouse blastocysts in situ using polynucleotide-specific fluorochromes. J Exp Zool. 1984;231(3):429–34. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402310317 6209359

24. Wolf E, Arnold GJ, Bauersachs S, Beier HM, Blum H, Einspanier R, et al. Embryo-maternal communication in bovine—strategies for deciphering a complex cross-talk. Reprod Domest Anim. 2003;38(4):276–89. 12887567

25. Wu C. Focal adhesion: a focal point in current cell biology and molecular medicine. Cell Adh Migr. 2007;1(1):13–8. doi: 10.4161/cam.1.1.4081 19262093

26. Fu M, Wang C, Li Z, Sakamaki T, Pestell RG. Minireview: Cyclin D1: normal and abnormal functions. Endocrinology. 2004;145(12):5439–47. doi: 10.1210/en.2004-0959 15331580

27. Goodsell DS. The molecular perspective: epidermal growth factor. Stem Cells. 2003;21(6):702–3. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.21-6-702 14595130

28. Fujihara M, Comizzoli P, Keefer CL, Wildt DE, Songsasen N. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) sustains in vitro primordial follicle viability by enhancing stromal cell proliferation via MAPK and PI3K pathways in the prepubertal, but not adult, cat ovary. Biol Reprod. 2014;90(4):86. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.113.115089 24554736

29. Prochazka R, Petlach M, Nagyova E, Nemcova L. Effect of epidermal growth factor-like peptides on pig cumulus cell expansion, oocyte maturation, and acquisition of developmental competence in vitro: comparison with gonadotropins. Reproduction. 2011;141(4):425–35. doi: 10.1530/REP-10-0418 21239527

30. Lorenzo PL, Illera MJ, Illera JC, Illera M. Enhancement of cumulus expansion and nuclear maturation during bovine oocyte maturation in vitro by the addition of epidermal growth factor and insulin-like growth factor I. J Reprod Fertil. 1994;101(3):697–701. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.1010697 7966028

31. Shabankareh HK, Zandi M. Developmental potential of sheep oocytes cultured in different maturation media: effects of epidermal growth factor, insulin-like growth factor I, and cysteamine. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(1):335–40. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.160 19324348

32. Sirisathien S, Hernandez-Fonseca HJ, Brackett BG. Influences of epidermal growth factor and insulin-like growth factor-I on bovine blastocyst development in vitro. Anim Reprod Sci. 2003;77(1–2):21–32. 12654525

33. Song HJ, Kang EJ, Maeng GH, Ock SA, Lee SL, Yoo JG, et al. Influence of epidermal growth factor supplementation during in vitro maturation on nuclear status and gene expression of canine oocytes. Res Vet Sci. 2011;91(3):439–45. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.09.003 20888022

34. Neira JA, Tainturier D, Pena MA, Martal J. Effect of the association of IGF-I, IGF-II, bFGF, TGF-beta1, GM-CSF, and LIF on the development of bovine embryos produced in vitro. Theriogenology. 2010;73(5):595–604. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.10.015 20035987

35. Eberwein P, Laird D, Schulz S, Reinhard T, Steinberg T, Tomakidi P. Modulation of focal adhesion constituents and their down-stream events by EGF: On the cross-talk of integrins and growth factor receptors. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1853(10 Pt A):2183–98.

36. Lee CN, Ax RL. Concentrations and composition of glycosaminoglycans in the female bovine reproductive tract. J Dairy Sci. 1984;67(9):2006–9. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(84)81536-2 6436345

37. Suchanek E, Simunic V, Juretic D, Grizelj V. Follicular fluid contents of hyaluronic acid, follicle-stimulating hormone and steroids relative to the success of in vitro fertilization of human oocytes. Fertil Steril. 1994;62(2):347–52. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56890-3 8034084

38. Ohta N, Saito H, Kaneko T, Yoshida M, Takahashi T, Saito T, et al. Soluble CD44 in human ovarian follicular fluid. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001;18(1):21–5. doi: 10.1023/A:1026494528415 11292991

39. Archibong AE, Petters RM, Johnson BH. Development of porcine embryos from one- and two-cell stages to blastocysts in culture medium supplemented with porcine oviductal fluid. Biol Reprod. 1989;41(6):1076–83. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod41.6.1076 2624868

40. Laurent TC, Fraser JR. Hyaluronan. FASEB J. 1992;6(7):2397–404. 1563592

41. Qhattal HSS, Hye T, Alali A, Liu X. Hyaluronan polymer length, grafting density, and surface poly(ethylene glycol) coating influence in vivo circulation and tumor targeting of hyaluronan-grafted liposomes. ACS Nano. 2014;8(6):5423–40. doi: 10.1021/nn405839n 24806526

42. Oommen OP, Duehrkop C, Nilsson B, Hilborn J, Varghese OP. Multifunctional Hyaluronic Acid and Chondroitin Sulfate Nanoparticles: Impact of Glycosaminoglycan Presentation on Receptor Mediated Cellular Uptake and Immune Activation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(32):20614–24. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b06823 27468113

43. Donejko M, Rysiak E, Galicka E, Terlikowski R, Glazewska EK, Przylipiak A. Protective influence of hyaluronic acid on focal adhesion kinase activity in human skin fibroblasts exposed to ethanol. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017;11):669–76. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S125843 28293103

44. Kaneko T, Saito H, Toya M, Satio T, Nakahara K, Hiroi M. Hyaluronic acid inhibits apoptosis in granulosa cells via CD44. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000;17(3):162–7. doi: 10.1023/A:1009470206468 10911577

45. Turley E, Moore D. Hyaluronate binding proteins also bind to fibronectin, laminin and collagen. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1984;121(3):808–14. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(84)90750-2 6204647

46. Marei WF, Ghafari F, Fouladi-Nashta AA. Role of hyaluronic acid in maturation and further early embryo development of bovine oocytes. Theriogenology. 2012;78(3):670–7. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.03.013 22541325

47. Yokoo M, Shimizu T, Kimura N, Tunjung WAS, Matsumoto H, Abe H, et al. Role of the hyaluronan receptor CD44 during porcine oocyte maturation. J Reprod Dev. 2007;53(2):263–70. doi: 10.1262/jrd.18047 17135710

48. Opiela J, Romanek J, Lipinski D, Smorag Z. Effect of hyaluronan on developmental competence and quality of oocytes and obtained blastocysts from in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014):519189. doi: 10.1155/2014/519189 24689043

49. Keefer CL, Stice SL, Paprocki AM, Golueke P. In vitro culture of bovine IVM-IVF embryos: Cooperative interaction among embryos and the role of growth factors. Theriogenology. 1994;41(6):1323–31. doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(94)90491-z 16727487

50. Rios GL, Buschiazzo J, Mucci NC, Kaiser GG, Cesari A, Alberio RH. Combined epidermal growth factor and hyaluronic acid supplementation of in vitro maturation medium and its impact on bovine oocyte proteome and competence. Theriogenology. 2015;83(5):874–80. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.11.022 25497783

51. Furnus CC, Valcarcel A, Dulout FN, Errecalde AL. The hyaluronic acid receptor (CD44) is expressed in bovine oocytes and early stage embryos. Theriogenology. 2003;60(9):1633–44. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(03)00116-x 14580646

52. Bedaiwy MA, Mahfouz RZ, Goldberg JM, Sharma R, Falcone T, Abdel Hafez MF, Agarwal A. Relationship of reactive oxygen species levels in day 3 culture media to the outcome of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2037–42. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.020 20138266

53. Kurzawa R, Glabowski W, Baczkowski T, Wiszniewska B, Marchlewicz M. Growth factors protect in vitro cultured embryos from the consequences of oxidative stress. Zygote. 2004;12(3):231–40. 15521713

54. Onodera Y, Teramura T, Takehara T, Fukuda K. Hyaluronic acid regulates a key redox control factor Nrf2 via phosphorylation of Akt in bovine articular chondrocytes. FEBS Open Bio. 2015;5):476–84. doi: 10.1016/j.fob.2015.05.007 26106522

55. Kim Y, Lee Y-S, Choe J, Lee H, Kim Y-M, Jeoung D. CD44-epidermal growth factor receptor interaction mediates hyaluronic acid-promoted cell motility by activating protein kinase C signaling involving Akt, Rac1, Phox, reactive oxygen species, focal adhesion kinase, and MMP-2. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(33):22513–28. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M708319200 18577517

56. Rizos D, Ward F, Boland MP, Lonergan P. Effect of culture system on the yield and quality of bovine blastocysts as assessed by survival after vitrification. Theriogenology. 2001;56(1):1–16. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(01)00538-6 11467505

57. Rizos D, Gutierrez-Adan A, Perez-Garnelo S, La Fuente J de, Boland MP, Lonergan P. Bovine embryo culture in the presence or absence of serum: implications for blastocyst development, cryotolerance, and messenger RNA expression. Biol Reprod. 2003;68(1):236–43. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.007799 12493719

58. Kuzmany A, Havlicek V, Wrenzycki C, Wilkening S, Brem G, Besenfelder U. Expression of mRNA, before and after freezing, in bovine blastocysts cultured under different conditions. Theriogenology. 2011;75(3):482–94. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.09.016 21144573

59. Gardner DK, Rodriegez-Martinez H, Lane M. Fetal development after transfer is increased by replacing protein with the glycosaminoglycan hyaluronan for mouse embryo culture and transfer. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(10):2575–80. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.10.2575 10527990

60. Dattena M, Mara L, Bin T AA, Cappai P. Lambing rate using vitrified blastocysts is improved by culture with BSA and hyaluronan. Mol Reprod Dev. 2007;74(1):42–7. doi: 10.1002/mrd.20576 16929524

61. Thongkittidilok C, Tharasanit T, Songsasen N, Sananmuang T, Buarpung S, Techakumphu M. Epidermal growth factor improves developmental competence and embryonic quality of singly cultured domestic cat embryos. J Reprod Dev. 2015;61(4):269–76. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2014-167 25985792

62. Jackson RL, Busch SJ, Cardin AD. Glycosaminoglycans: molecular properties, protein interactions, and role in physiological processes. Physiol Rev. 1991;71(2):481–539. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1991.71.2.481 2006221

63. Roy F, DeBlois C, Doillon CJ. Extracellular matrix analogs as carriers for growth factors: in vitro fibroblast behavior. J Biomed Mater Res. 1993;27(3):389–97. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820270312 8360207

64. Papakonstantinou E, Karakiulakis G, Roth M, Block LH. Platelet-derived growth factor stimulates the secretion of hyaluronic acid by proliferating human vascular smooth muscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(21):9881–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.21.9881 7568237

65. Tirone E, D'Alessandris C, Hascall VC, Siracusa G, Salustri A. Hyaluronan synthesis by mouse cumulus cells is regulated by interactions between follicle-stimulating hormone (or epidermal growth factor) and a soluble oocyte factor (or transforming growth factor beta1). J Biol Chem. 1997;272(8):4787–94. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.8.4787 9030534

66. Xu H, Wu K, Tian Y, Liu Q, Han N, Yuan X, et al. CD44 correlates with clinicopathological characteristics and is upregulated by EGFR in breast cancer. Int J Oncol. 2016;49(4):1343–50. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3639 27499099

67. Zhang S, Chang MC, Zylka D, Turley S, Harrison R, Turley EA. The hyaluronan receptor RHAMM regulates extracellular-regulated kinase. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(18):11342–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.18.11342 9556628

68. Stojkovic M, Krebs O, Kolle S, Prelle K, Assmann V, Zakhartchenko V, et al. Developmental regulation of hyaluronan-binding protein (RHAMM/IHABP) expression in early bovine embryos. Biol Reprod. 2003;68(1):60–6. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.007716 12493696

69. Mitra SK, Hanson DA, Schlaepfer DD. Focal adhesion kinase: in command and control of cell motility. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6(1):56–68. doi: 10.1038/nrm1549 15688067

70. Yang Y, Du J, Hu Z, Liu J, Tian Y, Zhu Y, et al. Activation of Rac1-PI3K/Akt is required for epidermal growth factor-induced PAK1 activation and cell migration in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. J Biomed Res. 2011;25(4):237–45. doi: 10.1016/S1674-8301(11)60032-8 23554696

71. Manser E, Huang HY, Loo TH, Chen XQ, Dong JM, Leung T, Lim L. Expression of constitutively active alpha-PAK reveals effects of the kinase on actin and focal complexes. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17(3):1129–43. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.3.1129 9032240

72. Chang F, Lemmon CA, Park D, Romer LH. FAK potentiates Rac1 activation and localization to matrix adhesion sites: a role for betaPIX. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18(1):253–64. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E06-03-0207 17093062

73. Carisey A, Ballestrem C. Vinculin, an adapter protein in control of cell adhesion signalling. Eur J Cell Biol. 2011;90(2–3):157–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2010.06.007 20655620

74. Memili E, First NL. Zygotic and embryonic gene expression in cow: a review of timing and mechanisms of early gene expression as compared with other species. Zygote. 2000;8(1):87–96. 10840878

75. Graf A, Krebs S, Heininen-Brown M, Zakhartchenko V, Blum H, Wolf E. Genome activation in bovine embryos: review of the literature and new insights from RNA sequencing experiments. Anim Reprod Sci. 2014;149(1–2):46–58. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.05.016 24975847

76. Sagirkaya H, Misirlioglu M, Kaya A, First NL, Parrish JJ, Memili E. Developmental and molecular correlates of bovine preimplantation embryos. Reproduction. 2006;131(5):895–904. doi: 10.1530/rep.1.01021 16672354

77. Wang Y, Jadhav RR, Liu J, Wilson D, Chen Y, Thompson IM, et al. Roles of Distal and Genic Methylation in the Development of Prostate Tumorigenesis Revealed by Genome-wide DNA Methylation Analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6):22051. doi: 10.1038/srep22051 26924343

78. Doerfler W. On the biological significance of DNA methylation. Biochemistry (Mosc). 2005;70(5):505–24.

79. Long MD, Smiraglia DJ, Campbell MJ. The Genomic Impact of DNA CpG Methylation on Gene Expression; Relationships in Prostate Cancer. Biomolecules 2017. doi: 10.3390/biom7010015 28216563

80. Watt F, Molloy PL. Cytosine methylation prevents binding to DNA of a HeLa cell transcription factor required for optimal expression of the adenovirus major late promoter. Genes Dev. 1988;2(9):1136–43. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.9.1136 3192075