Leadership in informal stormwater governance networks

English version

Autoři: Brian C. Chaffin ^aff001; Theresa M. Floyd ^aff002; Sandra L. Albro ^aff003
Působiště autorů: W.A. Franke College of Forestry & Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, United States of America ^aff001; College of Business, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, United States of America ^aff002; Holden Forests & Gardens, Cleveland, OH, United States of America ^aff003
Vyšlo v časopise: PLoS ONE 14(10)
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222434

Souhrn

Recent transitions in the governance of urban stormwater, specifically developments that leverage the environmental and social benefits of green infrastructure (GI) including infiltration and neighborhood stabilization, often require capacities beyond those of any single municipal- or regional-scale organization. In many cities, transitions toward green stormwater infrastructure have been shepherded by networks of individuals spanning a diversity of organizations from governments to NGOs. These networks are often informal, that is, not established by legal mandate, governing authority, or formal agreement, and are often striking for their lack of formal hierarchy or formal leadership. Previous scholarship has revealed the importance of leadership in the development and efficacy of these multiorganizational, cross-sector environmental governance networks, but research has yet to empirically investigate and characterize informal network leaders within the context of GI for stormwater mitigation. To address this gap, we designed and administered a social network analysis (SNA) survey to individuals in a regional network of GI stormwater management professionals in and around Cleveland, Ohio USA. We collected network data on individual relationships, including collaboration and trust, and tested the impact of these relationships on peer-recognition of leaders in the GI network. Our findings suggest that network size, frequency of collaboration, and individual position within the network—specifically, betweenness centrality and openness—defined and likely supported leaders in the stormwater governance network. Leaders in this non-hierarchical, multi-institution context were more likely to be women and brokerage roles within the network benefitted women, not men, which contrasts with previous findings from research on single-organization and corporate networks. The implications of this research suggest that informal environmental governance networks, such as the GI network investigated, differ substantially from the generally more hierarchical networks of organizations. This finding is useful for municipalities and regional authorities grappling with complex environmental challenges, including transitions in strategies to manage excess stormwater for the protection of municipal drinking water sources and urban freshwater ecosystems.

Klíčová slova:

Network analysis – Behavior – Surveys – Social networks – Centrality – Personality traits – Prototypes – Urban environments

Zdroje

1. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J. Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2005;30: 441–473. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511

2. Hahn T, Olsson P, Folke C, Johansson K. Trust-building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: The role of a bridging organization for adaptive comanagement of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden. Hum Ecol. 2006;34: 573–592. doi: 10.1007/s10745-006-9035-z

3. Olsson P, Gunderson LH, Carpenter SR, Ryan P, Lebel L, Folke C, et al. Shooting the rapids: Navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc. 2006;11. doi: 10.5751/ES-01595-110118

4. Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature. 2001;413: 591–596. doi: 10.1038/35098000 11595939

5. Vörösmarty CJ, Green P, Salisbury J, Lammers RB. Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science. 2000;289: 284–288. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5477.284 10894773

6. Gill S., Handley J., Ennos A., Pauleit S. Adapting Cities for Climate Change: The Role of the Green Infrastructure. Built Environ. 2007;33: 115–133. doi: 10.2148/benv.33.1.115

7. Bodin Ö, Prell C., editors. Social Networks and Natural Resource Management: Uncovering the Social Fabric of Environmental Governance. Cambridge University Press; 2011.

8. Case P, Evans LS, Fabinyi M, Cohen PJ, Hicks CC, Prideaux M, et al. Rethinking environmental leadership: The social construction of leaders and leadership in discourses of ecological crisis, development, and conservation. Leadership. 2015;11: 396–423. doi: 10.1177/1742715015577887

9. Evans LS, Hicks CC, Cohen PJ, Case P, Prideaux M, Mills DJ. Understanding leadership in the environmental sciences. Ecol Soc. 2015;20. doi: 10.5751/ES-07268-200150

10. Chaffin BC, Shuster WD, Garmestani AS, Furio B, Albro SL, Gardiner M, et al. A tale of two rain gardens: Barriers and bridges to adaptive management of urban stormwater in Cleveland, Ohio. J Environ Manage. 2016;183: 431–441. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.06.025 27372737

11. Hogan R, Curphy GJ, Hogan J. What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. Am Psychol. 1994;49: 493–504. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.49.6.493 8042818

12. Taggar S, Hackett R, Saha S. Leadership emergence in automonous work groups: Antecedents and outcomes. Pers Psychol. 1999;52: 899–926. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00184.x

13. Derue DS, Nahrgang JD, Wellman N, Humphrey SE. Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Pers Psychol. 2011;64: 7–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01201.x

14. U.S. v. Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District [Internet]. 2011. Available: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2013-09/documents/neorsd-cd.pdf

15. Green OO, Garmestani AS, Albro S, Ban NC, Berland A, Burkman CE, et al. Adaptive governance to promote ecosystem services in urban green spaces. Urban Ecosyst. 2016;19: 77–93. doi: 10.1007/s11252-015-0476-2

16. Nenadovic M, Epstein G. The relationship of social capital and fishers’ participation in multi-level governance arrangements. Environ Sci Policy. 2016;61: 77–86.

17. Sandström A, Rova C. Adaptive co-management networks: A comparative analysis of two fishery conservation areas in Sweden. Ecol Soc. 2010;15. doi: 10.5751/ES-03531-150314

18. Lubell M, Fulton A. Local policy networks and agricultural watershed management. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2008;18: 673–696. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum031

19. Lubell M, Jasny L, Hastings A. Network Governance for Invasive Species Management. Conserv Lett. 2017;10: 699–707. doi: 10.1111/conl.12311

20. Rathwell KJ, Peterson GD. Connecting social networks with ecosystem services for watershed governance: A social-ecological network perspective highlights the critical role of bridging organizations. Ecol Soc. 2012;17. doi: 10.5751/ES-04810-170224

21. Schneider M, Scholz J, Lubell M, Mindruta D, Edwardsen M. Building consensual institutions: networks and the National Estuary Program. Am J Pol Sci. 2003;47: 143–158.

22. Stein C, Ernstson H, Barron J. A social network approach to analyzing water governance: The case of the Mkindo catchment, Tanzania. Phys Chem Earth. Elsevier Ltd; 2011;36: 1085–1092. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2011.07.083

23. Lubell M, Schneider M, Scholz JT, Mete M. Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions. Am J Pol Sci. 2002;46: 148–163.

24. Rogers P, Hall AW. Effective water governance. Global Water Partnership Technical Committee (TEC) Background Paper 7 [Internet]. Stockholm, Sweden; 2003. Available: https://www.gwp.org/globalassets/global/toolbox/publications/background-papers/07-effective-water-governance-2003-english.pdf

25. Delmas MA, Young OR. Governance for the environment: new perspectives. Cambridge University Press; 2009.

26. Cosens BA, Gunderson L, Chaffin BC. Introduction to the Special Feature Practicing Panarchy: Assessing legal flexibility, ecological resilience, and adaptive governance in regional water systems experiencing rapid environmental change. Ecol Soc. 2018;23. doi: 10.5751/ES-09524-230104

27. Lemos MC, Agrawal A. Environmental Governance. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2006;31: 297–325. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621

28. Bodin Ö, Crona BI. The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Glob Environ Chang. 2009;19: 366–374. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002

29. Bodin Ö, Crona B, Ernstson H. Social Networks in Natural Resource Management: What Is There to Learn from a Structural Perspective? Ecol Soc. 2006;11: r2. Available: https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/resp2/

30. Harrison JL, Montgomery CA, Bliss JC. Beyond the Monolith: The Role of Bonding, Bridging, and Linking Social Capital in the Cycle of Adaptive Capacity. Soc Nat Resour. 2016;29: 525–539. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1103389

31. Prell C, Hubacek K, Reed M. Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour. 2009;22: 501–518. doi: 10.1080/08941920802199202

32. Sandström A, Rova C. The network structure of adaptive governance-A single case study of a fish management area. Int J Commons. 2009;4: 528–551. doi: 10.18352/ijc.156

33. Lubell M, Robins G, Wang P. Network structure and institutional complexity in an ecology of water management games. Ecol Soc. 2014;19. doi: 10.5751/ES-06880-190423

34. Berardo R, Scholz JT. Self-organizing policy networks: risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries. Am J Pol Sci. 2010;54: 632–649. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00451.x

35. Bodin Ö, Crona BI. Management of Natural Resources at the Community Level: Exploring the Role of Social Capital and Leadership in a Rural Fishing Community. World Dev. 2008;36: 2763–2779. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.12.002

36. Barnes M, Gray SA. The Influence of Ethnic Diversity on Social Network Structure in a Common-Pool Resource System: Implications for Collaborative Management. Ecol Soc. 2016;18. doi: 10.5751/ES-05295-180123

37. Ernstson H, Sörlin S, Elmqvist T. Social Movements and Ecosystem Services—the Role of Social Network Structure in Protecting and Managing Urban Green Areas in Stockholm. Ecol Soc. 20098;13. Available: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art39/

38. Österblom H, Bodin Ö. Global Cooperation among Diverse Organizations to Reduce Illegal Fishing in the Southern Ocean. Conserv Biol. 2012;26: 638–648. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01850.x 22624623

39. Bass BM, Bass R. The Bass handbook of leadership: theory, research, and managerial applications / Bernard M. Bass with Ruth Bass. 4th ed. New York: Free Press; 2008.

40. Day D. The Oxford Handbook of Leadership and Organizations. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014.

41. Bolden R, Gosling J, Marturano A, Dennison P. A Review of Leadership Theory and Competency Frameworks [Internet]. Exeter, U.K.; 2003. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/10036/17494

42. Gruber JS. Key principles of community-based natural resource management: A synthesis and interpretation of identified effective approaches for managing the commons. Environ Manage. 2010;45: 52–66. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9235-y 19083051

43. Fabricius C, Folke C, Cundill G, Schultz L. Powerless Spectators, Coping Actors, and Adaptive Co-managers: a Synthesis of the Role of Communities in Ecosystem Management. Ecol Soc. 2007;12. Available: https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art29/

44. Scheffer M, Westley F, Brock W. Slow Response of Societies to New Problems: Causes and Costs. Ecosystems. 2003;6: 493–502. doi: 10.1007/PL00021504

45. Walters CJ. Is Adaptive Management Helping to Solve Fisheries Problems? AMBIO. 2009;36: 304–307. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[304:IAMHTS]2.0.CO;2

46. Westley FR, Tjornbo O, Schultz L, Olsson P, Folke C, Crona B, et al. A Theory of Transformative Agency in Linked Social-Ecological Systems. Ecol Soc. 2013;18. doi: 10.5751/ES-05072-180327

47. Ruttan LM. Sociocultural Heterogeneity and the Commons. Curr Anthropol. 2006;47: 843–853. doi: 10.1086/507185

48. Cinner JE, McClanahan TR, MacNeil MA, Graham NAJ, Daw TM, Mukminin A, et al. Comanagement of coral reef social-ecological systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109: 5219–22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1121215109 22431631

49. Evans LS, Cohen PJ, Case P, Hicks CC, Prideaux M, Mills DJ. The Landscape of Leadership in Environmental Governance: a Case Study from Solomon Islands. Hum Ecol. 2017;45: 357–365. doi: 10.1007/s10745-017-9901-x

50. Barker R. The Nature of Leadership. Hum relations. 2001;54: 469–494.

51. Bennet N, Wise C, Woods P, Harvey JA. Distributed Leadership: A review of literature. Nottingham, U.K.: National College for School Leadership; 2003. Available: http://oro.open.ac.uk/8534/

52. Uhl-Bien M. Relational Leadership Theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. Leadersh Q. 2006;17: 654–676. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007

53. Uhl-Bien M, Riggio RE, Lowe KB, Carsten MK. Followership theory: A review and research agenda. Leadersh Q. 2014;25: 83–104. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.007

54. Paunova M. The emergence of individual and collective leadership in task groups: A matter of achievement and ascription. Leadersh Q. 2015;26: 935–957. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.002

55. Eagly AH, Karau SJ. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychol Rev. 2002;109: 573–598. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.109.3.573 12088246

56. Lord R, Foti R, De Vader C. A test of leadership categorization theory: internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organ Behav Hum Perform. 1984;34: 343–378.

57. Schein VE. Relationships between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. J Appl Psychol. 1975;60: 340–344. doi: 10.1037/h0076637 1194167

58. Brown M, Treviño L, Harrison D. Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2005;97: 117–134. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002

59. Gardner W, Cogliser C, Davis K, Dickens M. Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. Leadersh Q. 2011;22: 1120–1145. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.007

60. Lemoine GJ, Aggarwal I, Steed LB. When women emerge as leaders: Effects of extraversion and gender composition in groups. Leadersh Q. 2016;27: 470–486. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.008

61. Carter DR, DeChurch LA, Braun MT, Contractor NS. Social network approaches to leadership: An integrative conceptual review. J Appl Psychol. 2015;100: 597–622. doi: 10.1037/a0038922 25798551

62. DeRue DS, Ashford SJ. Who will Lead and Who will Follow? a Social Process of Leadership Identity Construction in Organizations. Acad Manag Rev. 2010;35: 627–647. doi: 10.5465/amr.35.4.zok627

63. Hollenbeck JR, DeRue DS, Nahrgang JD. The opponent process theory of leadership succession. Organ Psychol Rev. 2015;5: 333–363. doi: 10.1177/2041386614530606

64. Hogg MA, van Knippenberg D, Rast DE. Intergroup Leadership in Organizations: Leading Across Group and Organizational Boundaries. Acad Manag Rev. 2012;37: 232–255. doi: 10.5465/amr.2010.0221

65. Osborn RN, Hunt JG, Jauch LR. Toward a contextual theory of leadership. Leadersh Q. 2002;13: 797–837. doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00154-6

66. Perrow C. Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1986.

67. Scott KA, Brown DJ. Female first, leader second? Gender bias in the encoding of leadership behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2006;101: 230–242. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.06.002

68. Borgatti SP, Mehra A, Brass DJ, Labianca G. Network analysis in the social sciences. Science. 2009;323: 892–895. doi: 10.1126/science.1165821 19213908

69. Brass DJ. A social network perspective on organizational psychology. In: Kozlowski SWJ, editor. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. pp. 667–695.

70. Bodin Ö, Robins G, McAllister RRJ, Guerrero AM, Crona B, Tengö M, et al. Theorizing benefits and constraints in collaborative environmental governance: A transdisciplinary social-ecological network approach for empirical investigations. Ecol Soc. 2016;21. doi: 10.5751/ES-08368-210140

71. Neubert MJ, Taggar S. Pathways to informal leadership: The moderating role of gender on the relationship of individual differences and team member network centrality to informal leadership emergence. Leadersh Q. 2004;15: 175–194. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.006

72. Silvia C, McGuire M. Leading public sector networks: An empirical examination of integrative leadership behaviors. Leadersh Q. 2010;21: 264–277. doi: 10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2010.01.006

73. Brands RA, Menges JI, Kilduff M. The Leader-in-Social-Network Schema: Perceptions of Network Structure Affect Gendered Attributions of Charisma. Organ Sci. 2015;26: 1210–1225. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2015.0965

74. Gronn P. Distributed Properties. Educ Manag Adm Leadership. 2000;28: 317–338. doi: 10.1177/0263211X000283006

75. Williams P. The Competent Boundary Spanner. Public Adm. 2002;80: 103–124. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00296

76. Van Wart M. Leadership in Public Organizations: An Introduction. 2nd edition. New York: Routledge; 2014. doi: 10.4324/9781315702926

77. Johnson S, Murphy S, Zewdie S, Reichard R. The strong, sensitive type: Effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2008;106: 39–60. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.12.002

78. Cleveland Urban Design Collaborative. Re-imagining a more sustainable Cleveland: Citywide strategies for reuse of vacant land [Internet]. Cleveland, OH; 2008. Available: http://www.cudc.kent.edu/projects_research/research/reimagining_cleveland.html

79. Cleveland City Planning Commission. 8 ideas for vacant land reuse in Cleveland [Internet]. Cleveland, OH; 2011. Available: http://planning.city.cleveland.oh.us/ftp/8IdeasForVacantLandReuseCleveland.pdf

80. McClelland E. Nothin’ But Blue Skies: The Heyday, Hard Times, and Hopes of America's Industrial Heartland. New York: Bloomsbury Press; 2013.

81. Hopkins KG, Grimm NB, York AM. Influence of governance structure on green stormwater infrastructure investment. Environ Sci Policy. 2018;84: 124–133. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVSCI.2018.03.008

82. US EPA. Clean Watersheds Needs Survey 2012 [Internet]. United States Environmental Protection Agency; 2019. Available: https://www.epa.gov/cwns

83. Autixier L, Mailhot A, Bolduc S, Madoux-Humery A-S, Galarneau M, Prévost M, et al. Evaluating rain gardens as a method to reduce the impact of sewer overflows in sources of drinking water. Sci Total Environ. 2014;499: 238–247. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.030 25192930

84. Miles B, Band LE. Green infrastructure stormwater management at the watershed scale: urban variable source area and watershed capacitance. Hydrol Process. 2015;29: 2268–2274. doi: 10.1002/HYP.10448

85. Dhakal KP, Chevalier LR. Urban Stormwater Governance: The Need for a Paradigm Shift. Environ Manage. 2016;57: 1112–1124. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0667-5 26837617

86. Jarden KM, Jefferson AJ, Grieser JM. Assessing the effects of catchment-scale urban green infrastructure retrofits on hydrograph characteristics. Hydrol Process. 2016;30: 1536–1550. doi: 10.1002/hyp.10736

87. Dhakal KP, Chevalier LR. Managing urban stormwater for urban sustainability: Barriers and policy solutions for green infrastructure application. J Environ Manage. 2017;203: 171–181. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.065 28783013

88. Roy AH, Wenger SJ, Fletcher TD, Walsh CJ, Ladson AR, Shuster WD, et al. Impediments and Solutions to Sustainable, Watershed-Scale Urban Stormwater Management: Lessons from Australia and the United States. Environ Manage. 2008;42: 344–359. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9119-1 18446406

89. Shuster WD, Dadio S, Drohan P, Losco R, Shaffer J. Residential demolition and its impact on vacant lot hydrology: Implications for the management of stormwater and sewer system overflows. Landsc Urban Plan. 2014;125: 48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.003

90. Herrmann DL, Shuster WD, Garmestani AS. Vacant urban lot soils and their potential to support ecosystem services. Plant Soil. 2017;413: 45–57. doi: 10.1007/s11104-016-2874-5

91. Hoornbeek J, Schwarz T. Sustainable Infrastructure in Shrinking Cities: Options for the Future. 2009; 35. Available: http://www.cudc.kent.edu/projects_research/research/54064004-Sustainable-Infrastructure-in-Shrinking-Cities.pdf

92. Shuster WD, Garmestani AS. Adaptive exchange of capitals in urban water resources management: an approach to sustainability? Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2015;17: 1393–1400. doi: 10.1007/s10098-014-0886-5

93. Albro SL. Vacant to vibrant: creating successful green infrastructure networks. Washington, D.C.: Island Press; 2019.

94. Albro SL, Burkholder S, Koonce J. Mind the gap: tools for a parcel-based storm water management approach. Landsc Res. 2017;42: 747–760. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2017.1363879

95. Zaccaro SJ, Green JP, Dubrow S, Kolze MJ. Leader individual differences, situational parameters, and leadership outcomes: A comprehensive review and integration. Leadersh Q. 2018;29: 2–43. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.10.003

96. Brass DJ. Being in the Right Place: A Structural Analysis of Individual Influence in an Organization. Adm Sci Q. 1984;29: 518–539. doi: 10.2307/2392937

97. Brass DJ. Men’s and Women’s Networks: A Study of Interaction Patterns and Influence In an Organization. Acad Manag J. 1985;28: 327–343. doi: 10.5465/256204

98. Mehra A, Kilduff M, Brass DJ. The Social Networks of High and Low Self-monitors: Implications for Workplace Performance. Adm Sci Q. 2001;46: 121–146.

99. Brass DJ, Burkhardt M. Potential Power and Power Use: An Investigation of Structure and Behavior. Acad Manag J. 1993;36: 441–470.

100. Krackhardt D. Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Adm Sci Q. 1990; 342–369.

101. Burt RS. Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2009.

102. Burt RS, Kilduff M, Tasselli S. Social Network Analysis: Foundations and Frontiers on Advantage. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64: 527–547. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143828 23282056

103. Borgatti S, Foster P. The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. J Manage. 2003;29: 991–1013.

104. Borgatti SP, Halgin DS. On Network Theory. Organ Sci. 2011;22: 1168–1181. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0641

105. Balkundi P, Kilduff M. The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership. Leadersh Q. 2006;17: 419–439. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.01.001

106. Ibarra H, Andrews S. Power, social influence, and sense making: effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Adm Sci Q. 1993; 277–303.

107. Balkundi P, Kilduff M. Centrality and charisma: comparing how leader networks and attributions affect team performance. J Appl Psychol. 2011;96: 1209–1222. doi: 10.1037/a0024890 21895351

108. Dirks K, Ferrin D. Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87: 611–628. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611 12184567

109. Burke CS, Sims DE, Lazzara EH, Salas E. Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration. Leadersh Q. 2007;18: 606–632. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.09.006

110. Hernandez M, Eberly MB, Avolio BJ, Johnson MD. The loci and mechanisms of leadership: Exploring a more comprehensive view of leadership theory. Leadersh Q. 2011;22: 1165–1185. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.009

111. Johnson JC, Parks DL. Communication Roles, Perceived Effectiveness, and Satisfaction in an Environmental Management Program. Comput Math Organ Theory. 1998;4: 223–239. doi: 10.1023/A:1009644511252

112. White L, Currie G, Lockett A. Pluralized leadership in complex organizations: Exploring the cross network effects between formal and informal leadership relations. Leadersh Q. 2016;27: 280–297. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.01.004

113. Eagly AH, Karau SJ. Gender and the Emergence of Leaders: A Meta-Analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;60: 685–710. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.685

114. Bass BM. Two Decades of Research and Development in Transformational Leadership. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 1999;8: 9–32. doi: 10.1080/135943299398410

115. Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Johnson JC. Analyzing Social Networks. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2013.

116. Trochim WMK, Donnelly JP, Arora K. Research Methods: The essential knowledge base. 2nd Edition. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning; 2015.

117. Thompson S. Sampling. 3rd Edition. New York: Wiley; 2012.

118. Vanek C, McDaniel S. Surveygizmo computer software. Boudler, CO; 2006.

119. Marsden P V. Network Data and Measurement. Annu Rev Sociol. 2012;16: 435–463. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.002251

120. Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC. Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies; 2002.

121. Freeman LC. A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness. Sociometry. 1977;40: 35–41. doi: 10.2307/3033543

122. Freeman LC. Centrality in Social Networks. Soc Networks. 1978;1: 215–239. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7

123. Borgatti SP. Structural holes: Unpacking Burt’s redundancy measures. Connections. 1997;20: 35–38.

124. Chua RYJ, Ingram P, Morris MW. From the head and the heart: Locating cognition- and affect-based trust in managers’ professional networks. Acad Manag J. 2008;51: 436–452. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2008.32625956

125. McAllister DJ. Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust As Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations. Acad Manag J. 1995;38: 24–59. doi: 10.2307/256727

126. Savin N, White K. The Durbin-Watson test for serial correlation with extreme sample sizes or many regressors. Econom J Econom Soc. 1977; 1989–1996.

127. Burt RS. The gender of Social Capital. Rationality Soc. 1998;10: 5–46. doi: 10.1177/104346398010001001

128. Brands RA, Kilduff M. Just Like a Woman? Effects of Gender-Biased Perceptions of Friendship Network Brokerage on Attributions and Performance. Organ Sci. 2014;25: 1530–1548. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2013.0880

Leadership in informal stormwater governance networks

Souhrn

Klíčová slova:

Zdroje

PLOS One

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz